1
|
Soudan D, Alam A, Basile G, Bataillon C, Billecocq S, Bouta N, Brochard C, Desprez C, Faucheron JL, Leroi AM, Loobuyck M, Mege D, Roumeguere P, Venara A, Vitton V. ANORECTAL PHYSIOTHERAPY IN COLOPROCTOLOGY: GUIDELINES OF THE FRENCH NATIONAL SOCIETY OF COLOPROCTOLOGY. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2025:102637. [PMID: 40541824 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2025.102637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2025] [Revised: 05/18/2025] [Accepted: 06/14/2025] [Indexed: 06/22/2025]
Abstract
Anorectal physiotherapy is a safe, effective, and commonly prescribed treatment for a wide range of functional anorectal disorders. It is usually integrated into a broader medical and surgical treatment plan. For optimal outcomes, sessions must be delivered by experienced practitioners and require active patient motivation. However, access to such expertise remains limited due to a shortage of trained professionals. A clear understanding of appropriate indications and physiotherapy modalities is essential for effective patient care coordination. Currently, no national guidelines are available in France. Therefore, the French National Society of Coloproctology (SNFCP) has developed clinical practice guidelines for the use of anorectal physiotherapy in coloproctology. A panel of 15 French experts in coloproctology conducted a systematic literature review and developed graded recommendations according to HAS guidelines. When data were lacking, expert agreements were established through a voting process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damien Soudan
- Cabinet de Proctologie de Nantes - Clinique Jules Verne - Nantes France.
| | - Amine Alam
- Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Institut Léopold Bellan -Service de proctologie médico-chirurgicale - France
| | - Gwendoline Basile
- Cabinet de kinesithérapie - 25 rue Albert Floquet 76420 Bihorel - France
| | | | - Sylvie Billecocq
- Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph - Service de gynecologie obstétrique - France
| | | | - Charlène Brochard
- CHU Rennes Pontchaillou - Service Explorations Fonctionnelles Service des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif - France
| | - Charlotte Desprez
- Univ Rouen Normandie, INSERM 1073, CHU Rouen, CIC-CRB 1404, Department of Digestive Physiology, F-76000, Rouen - France
| | - Jean-Luc Faucheron
- University Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, UMR 5525, VetAgro Sup, Grenoble INP, TIMC, Grenoble, France - Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble - France
| | - Anne-Marie Leroi
- Univ Rouen Normandie, INSERM 1073, CHU Rouen, CIC-CRB 1404, Department of Digestive Physiology, F-76000, Rouen - France
| | - Martine Loobuyck
- Cabinet de Kinésithérapie - 97 rue de Prony 75017 Paris - France
| | - Diane Mege
- Service de Chirurgie digestive - Hôpital de la Timone Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Aix-Marseille Université
| | - Pauline Roumeguere
- Cabinet de Proctologie de Bordeaux - Clinique Tivoli - Bordeaux - France
| | - Aurélien Venara
- Service de chirurgie digestive et endocrinienne - CHU Angers, France
| | - Véronique Vitton
- Service de Gastroenterologie, hôpital Nord, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Aix-Marseille Université, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pazidis A, Scot M, Davie C, Ziyaie D. Diagnosis and management of faecal incontinence in primary care. BMJ 2025; 388:e079980. [PMID: 40032325 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2024-079980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/05/2025]
Affiliation(s)
- Angelos Pazidis
- Department of Surgery, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, UK
| | - Mairi Scot
- School of Medicine, University of Dundee
| | - Carolyn Davie
- Kings Cross Health and Community Care Centre, Dundee
| | - Dorin Ziyaie
- Department of Surgery, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Idalsoaga F, Ayares G, Blaney H, Cabrera D, Chahuan J, Monrroy H, Matar A, Halawi H, Arrese M, Arab JP, Díaz LA. Neurogastroenterology and motility disorders in patients with cirrhosis. Hepatol Commun 2025; 9:e0622. [PMID: 39773873 PMCID: PMC11717532 DOI: 10.1097/hc9.0000000000000622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2024] [Accepted: 11/21/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2025] Open
Abstract
Neurogastroenterology and motility disorders are complex gastrointestinal conditions that are prevalent worldwide, particularly affecting women and younger individuals. These conditions significantly impact the quality of life of people suffering from them. There is increasing evidence linking these disorders to cirrhosis, with a higher prevalence compared to the general population. However, the link between neurogastroenterology and motility disorders and cirrhosis remains unclear due to undefined mechanisms. In addition, managing these conditions in cirrhosis is often limited by the adverse effects of drugs commonly used for these disorders, presenting a significant clinical challenge in the routine management of patients with cirrhosis. This review delves into this connection, exploring potential pathophysiological links and clinical interventions between neurogastroenterology disorders and cirrhosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco Idalsoaga
- Departamento De Gastroenterología, Escuela De Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica De Chile, Santiago, Chile
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Schulich School of Medicine, Western University & London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gustavo Ayares
- Departamento De Gastroenterología, Escuela De Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica De Chile, Santiago, Chile
- Universidad Finis Terrae, Escuela de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Fines Terrae, Santiago, Chile
| | - Hanna Blaney
- MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Medstar Transplant Hepatology Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Daniel Cabrera
- Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile
- Centro de Estudios e Investigación en Salud y Sociedad, Escuela de Medicina, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Bernardo O Higgins, Santiago, Chile
| | - Javier Chahuan
- Departamento De Gastroenterología, Escuela De Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica De Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Hugo Monrroy
- Departamento De Gastroenterología, Escuela De Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica De Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Ayah Matar
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Houssam Halawi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Marco Arrese
- Departamento De Gastroenterología, Escuela De Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica De Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Juan Pablo Arab
- Departamento De Gastroenterología, Escuela De Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica De Chile, Santiago, Chile
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Luis Antonio Díaz
- Departamento De Gastroenterología, Escuela De Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica De Chile, Santiago, Chile
- MASLD Research Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Attaallah W, Akin Mİ. Innovative home-based anal biofeedback application in faecal incontinence treatment-a video vignette. Colorectal Dis 2024; 26:2018-2019. [PMID: 39289844 DOI: 10.1111/codi.17178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2024] [Revised: 08/16/2024] [Accepted: 08/28/2024] [Indexed: 09/19/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Wafi Attaallah
- Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Marmara University, İstanbul, Turkey
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Belilos EA, Post Z, Anderson S, DeMeo M. The Clinical Utility of Anorectal Manometry: A Review of Current Practices. GASTRO HEP ADVANCES 2024; 4:100562. [PMID: 39866715 PMCID: PMC11761937 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastha.2024.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2024] [Accepted: 10/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/28/2025]
Abstract
Anorectal manometry (ARM) is a diagnostic test that utilizes pressure sensors to dynamically measure intraluminal anal and rectal pressures, thus providing an objective evaluation of anorectal functional parameters (tone, contractility, and relaxation), coordination and reflex activity, and sensation. ARM is a useful test for numerous indications including for the assessment and management of functional anorectal disorders such as fecal incontinence, functional defecatory disorders, and functional anorectal pain, preoperative assessment of anorectal function, and in facilitating/assessing response to biofeedback training. In addition, while many functional anorectal disorders present with overlapping symptoms (ie constipation, anorectal pain), ARM allows delineation of more specific disease processes and may guide treatment more effectively. In recent years the development of advanced manometric methodologies such as high-resolution anorectal manometry has also led to improved spatial resolution of data acquisition, further increasing the potential for the expansion of ARM. However, despite its ability to provide detailed information on anorectal and pelvic floor muscle function and synergy as well as the endorsements of several national and international organizations, ARM is still infrequently utilized in clinical practice. The purpose of this review is to address the current clinical applications and limitations of ARM for various disorders of the lower gastrointestinal tract. In so doing, we will provide clinicians with a framework for the use of ARM in clinical practice. This review will also discuss potential barriers to widespread adoption of ARM in clinical practice and propose possible solutions to these challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Zoë Post
- Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Sierra Anderson
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Mark DeMeo
- Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Swartz JL, Zifan A, Tuttle LJ, Sheean G, Tam RM, Mittal RK. Fecal incontinence patients categorized based on anal pressure and electromyography: Anal sphincter damage and clinical symptoms. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2024; 36:e14810. [PMID: 38689439 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2023] [Revised: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 04/14/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Disruption of external anal sphincter muscle (EAS) is an important factor in the multifactorial etiology of fecal incontinence (FI). OBJECTIVES We categorize FI patients into four groups based on the location of lesion in neuromuscular circuitry of EAS to determine if there are differences with regards to fecal incontinence symptoms severity (FISI) score, age, BMI, obstetrical history, and anal sphincter muscle damage. METHODS Female patients (151) without any neurological symptoms, who had undergone high-resolution manometry, anal sphincter EMG, and 3D ultrasound imaging of the anal sphincter were assessed. Patients were categorized into four groups: Group 1 (normal)-normal cough EMG (>10 μV), normal squeeze EMG (>10 μV), and normal anal squeeze pressure (>124 mmHg); Group 2 (cortical apraxia, i.e., poor cortical activation)-normal cough EMG, low squeeze EMG, and low anal squeeze pressure; Group 3 (muscle damage)-normal cough EMG, normal squeeze EMG, and low anal squeeze pressure; and Group 4 (pudendal nerve damage)-low cough EMG, low squeeze EMG, and low anal squeeze pressure. RESULTS The four patient groups were not different with regards to the patient's age, BMI, parity, and FISI scores. 3D ultrasound images of the anal sphincter complex revealed significant damage to the internal anal sphincter, external anal sphincter, and puborectalis muscles in all four groups. CONCLUSION The FI patients are a heterogeneous group; majority of these patients have significant damage to the muscles of the anal sphincter complex. Whether biofeedback therapy response is different among different patient groups requires study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica L Swartz
- Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Ali Zifan
- Department of Gastroenterology, UC San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Lori J Tuttle
- Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, USA
| | | | - Rowena M Tam
- Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Ravinder K Mittal
- Department of Gastroenterology, UC San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bosch NM, Kalkdijk-Dijkstra JA, van Westreenen HL, Broens PM, Pierie Eugène Nicolas J, van der Heijden JAG, Klarenbeek BR. Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation After Rectal Cancer Surgery One-year follow-up of a Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial (FORCE trial). Ann Surg 2024; 281:00000658-990000000-00944. [PMID: 38899475 PMCID: PMC11723484 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aims to evaluate the effects of pelvic floor rehabilitation (PFR) after low anterior resection (LAR) at one-year follow-up. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA After LAR, with restoration of bowel continuity, up to 90% of patients develop anorectal dysfunction, significantly impacting their quality of life. However, standardized treatment is currently unavailable. The FORCE trial demonstrated the beneficial effects of PFR after three months regarding specific domains of the Fecal Incontinence QoL (FIQL) questionnaire and urgency compared to usual care. METHODS The FORCE trial is a multicenter, two-arm, randomized clinical trial. All patients undergoing LAR were randomly assigned to receive either usual care or a standardized PFR program. The primary outcome measure is the Wexner incontinence score, and the secondary endpoints included the LARS score, the EORTC colorectal-specific QoL questionnaire, and health- and fecal incontinence-related QoL. Assessments were conducted at baseline before randomization, at three months and one-year follow-ups. RESULTS A total of 86 patients were included (PFR: n=40, control: n=46). After one year, PFR did not significantly improve Wexner incontinence scores (PFR: -3.33, 95% CI -4.41 to -2.26, control: -2.54, 95% CI -3.54 to -1.54, P=0.30). Similar to the three-month follow-up, patients without near-complete incontinence at baseline showed sustained improvement in fecal incontinence (PFR: -2.82, 95% CI -3.86 to -1.76, control: -1.43, 95% CI -2.36 to -0.50, P=0.06). Significant improvement was reported in the FIQL domains Lifestyle (PFR: 0.51, control: -0.13, P=0.03) and Coping and Behavior (PFR: 0.40, control: -0.24, P=0.01). CONCLUSION At one-year follow-up, no significant differences were found in fecal incontinence scores; however, PFR was associated with improved fecal incontinence related QoL compared to usual care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Paul ma Broens
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Joost Albertus Gerardus van der Heijden
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cerdán Miguel J, Arroyo Sebastián A, Codina Cazador A, de la Portilla de Juan F, de Miguel Velasco M, de San Ildefonso Pereira A, Jiménez Escovar F, Marinello F, Millán Scheiding M, Muñoz Duyos A, Ortega López M, Roig Vila JV, Salgado Mijaiel G. Baiona's Consensus Statement for Fecal Incontinence. Spanish Association of Coloproctology. Cir Esp 2024; 102:158-173. [PMID: 38242231 DOI: 10.1016/j.cireng.2023.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/21/2024]
Abstract
Faecal incontinence (FI) is a major health problem, both for individuals and for health systems. It is obvious that, for all these reasons, there is widespread concern for healing it or, at least, reducing as far as possible its numerous undesirable effects, in addition to the high costs it entails. There are different criteria for the diagnostic tests to be carried out and the same applies to the most appropriate treatment, among the numerous options that have proliferated in recent years, not always based on rigorous scientific evidence. For this reason, the Spanish Association of Coloproctology (AECP) proposed to draw up a consensus to serve as a guide for all health professionals interested in the problem, aware, however, that the therapeutic decision must be taken on an individual basis: patient characteristics/experience of the care team. For its development it was adopted the Nominal Group Technique methodology. The Levels of Evidence and Grades of Recommendation were established according to the criteria of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. In addition, expert recommendations were added briefly to each of the items analysed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Antonio Arroyo Sebastián
- Servicio de Cirugía General y Aparato Digestivo, Unidad de Coloproctología, Hospital General Universitario de Elche, Elche, Alicante, Spain
| | - Antonio Codina Cazador
- Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestiva, Unidad de Coloproctología, Hospital Universitario de Girona, Girona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Franco Marinello
- Unidad de Cirugía Colorrectal, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mónica Millán Scheiding
- Unidad de Coloproctología, Servicio de Cirugía General y Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Arantxa Muñoz Duyos
- Unidad de Coloproctología, Hospital Universitario Mútua Terrassa, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mario Ortega López
- Unidad de Coloproctología, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Varma R, Feuerhak KJ, Mishra R, Chakraborty S, Oblizajek NR, Bailey KR, Bharucha AE. A randomized double-blind trial of clonidine and colesevelam for women with fecal incontinence. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2024; 36:e14697. [PMID: 37890049 PMCID: PMC10842236 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2023] [Revised: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diarrhea and rectal urgency are risk factors for fecal incontinence (FI). The effectiveness of bowel modifiers for improving FI is unclear. METHODS In this double-blind, parallel-group, randomized trial, women with urge FI were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to a combination of oral clonidine (0.1 mg twice daily) with colesevelam (1875 mg twice daily) or two inert tablets for 4 weeks. The primary outcome was a ≥50% decrease in number of weekly FI episodes. KEY RESULTS Fifty-six participants were randomly assigned to clonidine-colesevelam (n = 24) or placebo (n = 32); 51 (91%) completed 4 weeks of treatment. At baseline, participants had a mean (SD) of 7.5 (8.2) FI episodes weekly. The primary outcome was met for 13 of 24 participants (54%) treated with clonidine-colesevelam versus 17 of 32 (53%) treated with placebo (p = 0.85). The Bristol stool form score decreased significantly, reflecting more formed stools with clonidine-colesevelam treatment (mean [SD], 4.5 [1.5] to 3.2 [1.5]; p = 0.02) but not with placebo (4.2 [1.9] to 4.1 [1.9]; p = 0.47). The proportion of FI episodes for semiformed stools decreased significantly from a mean (SD) of 76% (8%) to 61% (10%) in the clonidine-colesevelam group (p = 0.007) but not the placebo group (61% [8%] to 67% [8%]; p = 0.76). However, these treatment effects did not differ significantly between groups. Overall, clonidine-colesevelam was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES Compared with placebo, clonidine-colesevelam did not significantly improve FI despite being associated with more formed stools and fewer FI episodes for semiformed stools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Revati Varma
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Kelly J Feuerhak
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Rahul Mishra
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Nicholas R Oblizajek
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Kent R Bailey
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Adil E Bharucha
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ingemansson A, Walter SA, Jones MP, Sjödahl J. Defecation Symptoms in Relation to Stool Consistency Significantly Reflect the Dyssynergic Pattern in High-resolution Anorectal Manometry in Constipated Patients. J Clin Gastroenterol 2024; 58:57-63. [PMID: 36730549 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
GOALS To evaluate the usefulness of a 2-week patient-completed bowel habit and symptom diary as a screening tool for disordered rectoanal coordination (DRC). BACKGROUND DRC is an important subgroup of chronic constipation that benefits from biofeedback treatment. Diagnosis of DRC requires a dyssynergic pattern (DP) of attempted defecation in high-resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM) and at least 1 other positive standardized examination, such as the balloon expulsion test or defecography. However, HRAM is generally limited to tertiary gastroenterology centres and finding tools for selecting patients for referral for further investigations would be of clinical value. STUDY Retrospective data from HRAM and a 2-week patient-completed bowel habit and symptom diary from 99 chronically constipated patients were analyzed. RESULTS Fifty-seven percent of the patients had a DP pattern during HRAM. In the DP group, 76% of bowel movements with loose or normal stool resulted in a sense of incomplete evacuation compared with 55% of the non-DP group ( P =0.004). Straining and sensation of incomplete evacuation with the loose stool were significantly more common in the DP group ( P =0.032). Hard stool was a discriminator for non-DP ( P =0.044). Multiple logistic regression including incomplete evacuation and normal stool predicted DP with a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 50%. CONCLUSIONS The sensation of incomplete evacuation with loose or normal stool could be a potential discriminator in favor of DP in chronically constipated patients. The bowel habit and symptom diary may be a useful tool for stratifying constipated patients for further investigation of suspected DRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Ingemansson
- Department of Gastroenterology, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Susanna A Walter
- Department of Gastroenterology, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Michael P Jones
- Psychology Department, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, Australia
| | - Jenny Sjödahl
- Department of Gastroenterology, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bordeianou LG, Thorsen AJ, Keller DS, Hawkins AT, Messick C, Oliveira L, Feingold DL, Lightner AL, Paquette IM. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Fecal Incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2023; 66:647-661. [PMID: 40324433 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Amy J Thorsen
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Deborah S Keller
- Colorectal Center, Lankenau Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Alexander T Hawkins
- Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Craig Messick
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Lucia Oliveira
- Anorectal Physiology Department of Rio de Janeiro, CEPEMED, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Daniel L Feingold
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Amy L Lightner
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Ian M Paquette
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ng WKD, Chok AY, Ng YY, Seow‐En I, Tan EK. Efficacy of biofeedback therapy for faecal incontinence in an Asian population. ANZ J Surg 2022; 93:1262-1266. [DOI: 10.1111/ans.18131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2022] [Revised: 10/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Aik Yong Chok
- Department of Colorectal Surgery Singapore General Hospital Singapore
| | - Yvonne Ying‐Ru Ng
- Department of Colorectal Surgery Singapore General Hospital Singapore
| | - Isaac Seow‐En
- Department of Colorectal Surgery Singapore General Hospital Singapore
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Livovsky DM, Koslowsky B, Goldin E, Lysy J. External kinesiology tape for improvement in fecal incontinence symptom bother in women: a pilot study. Int Urogynecol J 2022; 33:2859-2868. [PMID: 35039916 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-021-05050-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS Fecal incontinence is a debilitating condition with a devastating impact on quality of life. Using a commercially available kinesiology band we developed an anal tape to be applied to the anus with the aim to determine its impact on symptom bother and quality of life. METHODS Four-week prospective, self-controlled, pilot study of patients with FI. The primary outcome was improvement in any of the four domains (lifestyle, coping/behavior, depression/self-perception, embarrassment) evaluated by the "Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale." Secondary outcomes included improvement in frequency of incontinence events and safety. Days 0-14 served as control period and days 15-28 as study period. Patients were asked to rate their satisfaction and willingness to use the device in the future using a 10-cm continuous visual analog scale. RESULTS Twenty patients completed the study. Median age was 64 years; all patients were females. Significant improvements were observed in all domains of the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale from baseline to day 28 (p < 0.001 for all) and in three of four domains between day 15 and 28 (p < 0.04) but not between days 1 and 14. Five patients (25%) had a ≥ 50% improvement in incontinence events. Patients reported satisfaction and willingness to use the anal tape in the future. Other than mild difficulty to remove the anal tape, no adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS In this small pilot study, the use of the anal tape was safe and effective. The primary outcome of significant improvement in quality of life was achieved ( ClinicalTrials.gov ID:NCT02989545). PUBLIC TRIAL REGISTRY ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02989545. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02989545.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan M Livovsky
- Digestive Diseases Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
- The Neurogastroenterology and Pelvic Floor Unit, Digestive Diseases Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel, 12 Baiyt St., Jerusalem, Israel.
| | - Benjamin Koslowsky
- Digestive Diseases Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Eran Goldin
- Digestive Diseases Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Joseph Lysy
- Digestive Diseases Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
- The Neurogastroenterology and Pelvic Floor Unit, Digestive Diseases Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel, 12 Baiyt St., Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bharucha AE, Knowles CH, Mack I, Malcolm A, Oblizajek N, Rao S, Scott SM, Shin A, Enck P. Faecal incontinence in adults. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2022; 8:53. [PMID: 35948559 DOI: 10.1038/s41572-022-00381-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Faecal incontinence, which is defined by the unintentional loss of solid or liquid stool, has a worldwide prevalence of ≤7% in community-dwelling adults and can markedly impair quality of life. Nonetheless, many patients might not volunteer the symptom owing to embarrassment. Bowel disturbances, particularly diarrhoea, anal sphincter trauma (obstetrical injury or previous surgery), rectal urgency and burden of chronic illness are the main risk factors for faecal incontinence; others include neurological disorders, inflammatory bowel disease and pelvic floor anatomical disturbances. Faecal incontinence is classified by its type (urge, passive or combined), aetiology (anorectal disturbance, bowel symptoms or both) and severity, which is derived from the frequency, volume, consistency and nature (urge or passive) of stool leakage. Guided by the clinical features, diagnostic tests and therapies are implemented stepwise. When simple measures (for example, bowel modifiers such as fibre supplements, laxatives and anti-diarrhoeal agents) fail, anorectal manometry and other tests (endoanal imaging, defecography, rectal compliance and sensation, and anal neurophysiological tests) are performed as necessary. Non-surgical options (diet and lifestyle modification, behavioural measures, including biofeedback therapy, pharmacotherapy for constipation or diarrhoea, and anal or vaginal barrier devices) are often effective, especially in patients with mild faecal incontinence. Thereafter, perianal bulking agents, sacral neuromodulation and other surgeries may be considered when necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adil E Bharucha
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | - Charles H Knowles
- Blizard Institute, Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Isabelle Mack
- University Hospital, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Allison Malcolm
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal North Shore Hospital and University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nicholas Oblizajek
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Satish Rao
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - S Mark Scott
- Blizard Institute, Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Andrea Shin
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Paul Enck
- University Hospital, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Tübingen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation After Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial (FORCE Trial). Ann Surg 2022; 276:38-45. [PMID: 34966064 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the effects of PFR after LAR compared to usual care without PFR. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Functional complaints, including fecal incontinence, often occur after LAR for rectal cancer. Controversy exists about the effectiveness of PFR in improving such postoperative functional outcomes. METHODS This was a multicenter, randomized controlled trial involving 17 Dutch centers. Patients after LAR for rectal cancer were randomly assigned (1:1) to usual care or PFR and stratified by sex and administration of neoadjuvant therapy. Selection was not based on severity of complaints at baseline. Baseline measurements were taken 3 months after surgery without temporary stoma construction or 6 weeks after stoma closure. The primary outcome measure was the change in Wexner incontinence scores 3 months after randomization. Secondary outcomes were fecal incontinence-related quality of life, colorectal-specific quality of life, and the LARS scores. RESULTS Between October 2017 and March 2020, 128 patients were enrolled and 106 randomly assigned (PFR n = 51, control n = 55); 95 patients (PFR n = 44, control n = 51) were assessable for final analysis. PFR did not lead to larger changes in Wexner incontinence scores in nonselected patients after LAR compared to usual care [PFR: -2.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) -3.3 to -1.4, control: -1.3, 95% CI -2.2 to -0.4, P = 0.13]. However, PFR was associated with less urgency at follow-up (odds ratio 0.22, 95% CI 0.06-0.86). Patients without near-complete incontinence reported larger Wexner score improvements after PFR (PFR: -2.1, 95% CI -3.1 to -1.1, control: -0.7, 95% CI -1.6 to 0.2, P = 0.045). For patients with at least moderate incontinence PFR resulted in relevant improvements in all fecal incontinence-related quality of life domains, while the control group deteriorated. These improvements were even larger when patients with near-complete incontinence were excluded. No serious adverse PFR-related events occurred. CONCLUSION No benefit was found of PFR in all patients but several subgroups were identified that did benefit from PFR, such as patients with urgency or with at least moderate incontinence and no near-complete incontinence. A selective referral policy (65%-85% of all patients) is suggested to improve postoperative functional outcomes for patients after LAR for rectal cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION Netherlands Trial Registration, NTR5469, registered on 3 September 2015.
Collapse
|
16
|
Assmann SL, Keszthelyi D, Kleijnen J, Anastasiou F, Bradshaw E, Brannigan AE, Carrington EV, Chiarioni G, Ebben LDA, Gladman MA, Maeda Y, Melenhorst J, Milito G, Muris JWM, Orhalmi J, Pohl D, Tillotson Y, Rydningen M, Svagzdys S, Vaizey CJ, Breukink SO. Guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of Faecal Incontinence-A UEG/ESCP/ESNM/ESPCG collaboration. United European Gastroenterol J 2022; 10:251-286. [PMID: 35303758 PMCID: PMC9004250 DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.12213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The goal of this project was to create an up-to-date joint European clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of faecal incontinence (FI), using the best available evidence. These guidelines are intended to help guide all medical professionals treating adult patients with FI (e.g., general practitioners, surgeons, gastroenterologists, other healthcare workers) and any patients who are interested in information regarding the diagnosis and management of FI. METHODS These guidelines have been created in cooperation with members from the United European Gastroenterology (UEG), European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP), European Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility (ESNM) and the European Society for Primary Care Gastroenterology (ESPCG). These members made up the guideline development group (GDG). Additionally, a patient advisory board (PAB) was created to reflect and comment on the draft guidelines from a patient perspective. Relevant review questions were established by the GDG along with a set of outcomes most important for decision making. A systematic literature search was performed using these review questions and outcomes as a framework. For each predefined review question, the study or studies with the highest level of study design were included. If evidence of a higher-level study design was available, no lower level of evidence was sought or included. Data from the studies were extracted by two reviewers for each predefined important outcome within each review question. Where possible, forest plots were created. After summarising the results for each review question, a systematic quality assessment using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations) approach was performed. For each review question, we assessed the quality of evidence for every predetermined important outcome. After evidence review and quality assessment were completed, recommendations could be formulated. The wording used for each recommendation was dependent on the level of quality of evidence. Lower levels of evidence resulted in weaker recommendations and higher levels of evidence resulted in stronger recommendations. Recommendations were discussed within the GDG to reach consensus. RESULTS These guidelines contain 45 recommendations on the classification, diagnosis and management of FI in adult patients. CONCLUSION These multidisciplinary European guidelines provide an up-to-date comprehensive evidence-based framework with recommendations on the diagnosis and management of adult patients who suffer from FI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sadé L. Assmann
- Department of Surgery and Colorectal SurgeryMaastricht University Medical CentreMaastrichtThe Netherlands
- Division of Gastroenterology‐HepatologyDepartment of Internal MedicineMaastricht University Medical CentreMaastrichtThe Netherlands
- School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM)Maastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | - Daniel Keszthelyi
- Division of Gastroenterology‐HepatologyDepartment of Internal MedicineMaastricht University Medical CentreMaastrichtThe Netherlands
- School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM)Maastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | - Jos Kleijnen
- School for Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW)Maastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | - Foteini Anastasiou
- 4rth TOMY – Academic Primary Care Unit Clinic of Social and Family MedicineUniversity of CreteHeraklionGreece
| | - Elissa Bradshaw
- Community Gastroenterology Specialist NurseRoyal Free HospitalLondonEnglandUK
| | | | - Emma V. Carrington
- Surgical Professorial UnitDepartment of Colorectal SurgerySt Vincent's University HospitalDublinIreland
| | - Giuseppe Chiarioni
- Division of Gastroenterology of the University of VeronaAOUI VeronaVeronaItaly
- Center for Functional GI and Motility DisordersUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNorth CarolinaUSA
| | | | - Marc A. Gladman
- The University of AdelaideAdelaide Medical SchoolFaculty of Health & Medical SciencesAdelaideAustralia
| | - Yasuko Maeda
- Department of Surgery and Colorectal SurgeryWestern General HospitalEdinburghUK
| | - Jarno Melenhorst
- Department of Surgery and Colorectal SurgeryMaastricht University Medical CentreMaastrichtThe Netherlands
- School for Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW)Maastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | | | - Jean W. M. Muris
- Department of General PracticeCare and Public Health Research InstituteMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | | | - Daniel Pohl
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyUniversity Hospital ZurichZurichSwitzerland
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryUniversity Hospital of North NorwayTromsøNorway
| | | | - Mona Rydningen
- Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Incontinence and Pelvic Floor HealthTromsøNorway
| | - Saulius Svagzdys
- Medical AcademyLithuanian University of Health SciencesClinic of Surgery Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kauno KlinikosKaunasLithuania
| | | | - Stephanie O. Breukink
- Department of Surgery and Colorectal SurgeryMaastricht University Medical CentreMaastrichtThe Netherlands
- School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM)Maastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
- School for Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW)Maastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Menees S, Chey WD. Fecal Incontinence: Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Updated Treatment Strategies. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2022; 51:71-91. [PMID: 35135666 DOI: 10.1016/j.gtc.2021.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
Fecal incontinence (FI) is defined as the involuntary loss or passage of solid or liquid stool in patients. FI is a common and debilitating condition in men and women. The incidence increases with age and also often goes unreported to health care providers. It is crucial that providers ask at-risk patients about possible symptoms. Evaluation and management is tailored to specific symptoms and characteristics of the incontinence. If conservative methods fail to improve symptoms, then other surgical options are considered, such as sacral nerve stimulation and anal sphincter augmentation. This review provides an update on current and future therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacy Menees
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| | - William D Chey
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mittal RK, Tuttle LJ. Anorectal Anatomy and Function. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2022; 51:1-23. [PMID: 35135656 DOI: 10.1016/j.gtc.2021.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/21/2023]
Abstract
Anatomy of pelvic floor muscles has long been controversial. Novel imaging modalities, such as three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound imaging, MRI, and diffusion tensor imaging, have revealed unique myoarchitecture of the external anal sphincter and puborectalis muscle. High-resolution anal manometry, high-definition anal manometry, and functional luminal imaging probe are important new tools to assess anal sphincter and puborectalis muscle function. Increased understanding of the structure and function of anal sphincter complex/pelvic floor muscle has improved the ability to diagnose patients with pelvic floor disorders. New therapeutic modalities to treat anal/fecal incontinence and other pelvic floor disorders will emerge in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ravinder K Mittal
- Department of Medicine/Gastroenterology, University of California, San Diego, ACTRI, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0061, La Jolla, CA 92093-0990, USA.
| | - Lori J Tuttle
- Department of Medicine/Gastroenterology, University of California, San Diego, USA; San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Disorders of anorectal motility: Functional defecation disorders and fecal incontinence. J Visc Surg 2022; 159:S40-S50. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2021.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
20
|
Zhou J, Ho V, Javadi B. New Internet of Medical Things for Home-Based Treatment of Anorectal Disorders. SENSORS 2022; 22:s22020625. [PMID: 35062585 PMCID: PMC8780207 DOI: 10.3390/s22020625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Revised: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Home-based healthcare provides a viable and cost-effective method of delivery for resource- and labour-intensive therapies, such as rehabilitation therapies, including anorectal biofeedback. However, existing systems for home anorectal biofeedback are not able to monitor patient compliance or assess the quality of exercises performed, and as a result have yet to see wide spread clinical adoption. In this paper, we propose a new Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) system to provide home-based biofeedback therapy, facilitating remote monitoring by the physician. We discuss our user-centric design process and the proposed architecture, including a new sensing probe, mobile app, and cloud-based web application. A case study involving biofeedback training exercises was performed. Data from the IoMT was compared against the clinical standard, high-definition anorectal manometry. We demonstrated the feasibility of our proposed IoMT in providing anorectal pressure profiles equivalent to clinical manometry and its application for home-based anorectal biofeedback therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerry Zhou
- Translational Gastroenterology Laboratory, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW 2560, Australia; (J.Z.); (V.H.)
| | - Vincent Ho
- Translational Gastroenterology Laboratory, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW 2560, Australia; (J.Z.); (V.H.)
- Department of Gastroenterology, Campbelltown Hospital, Campbelltown, NSW 2560, Australia
| | - Bahman Javadi
- School of Computer, Data and Mathematical Sciences, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +61-2-9685-9181
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Fomenko OY, Frolov SA, Kashnikov VN, Kuzminov AM, Belousova SV, Kozlov VA, Korolik VY, Mukhin IA, Nekrasov MA. [Medical rehabilitation in patients with anal incompetence after surgery for stage IV hemorrhoids]. VOPROSY KURORTOLOGII, FIZIOTERAPII, I LECHEBNOI FIZICHESKOI KULTURY 2022; 99:36-42. [PMID: 35981340 DOI: 10.17116/kurort20229904136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED The choice of medical rehabilitation in patients with anal incontinence is impossible without diagnostic data revealing the mechanism of fecal incontinence. The most promising are programs of comprehensive physiotherapeutic rehabilitation based on biofeedback training. The rate of anal incompetence (AI) after hemorrhoidectomy is 1.3-12.5%. However, in addition to the organic cause (surgical trauma), functional disorders of the external sphincter and pelvic floor muscles may contribute to the pathogenesis of anal incontinence, aggravating the incontinence symptoms after surgery. Therefore, these functional disorders should be diagnosed before surgery. However, medical rehabilitation programs for anal incontinence after hemorrhoidectomy are not standardized, and functional outcomes have not been studied. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the outcomes of comprehensive rehabilitation in patients with AI after hemorrhoidectomy to improve quality of life after surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective study was carried out on 46 patients (mean age 53.8±15.4 years) after hemorrhoidectomy with fecal incontinence, 13 (28.3%) males and 33 (71.7%) females. The main group included 25 patients who received comprehensive rehabilitation, including biofeedback training and tibial neuromodulation (TNM) for 15 days. The control group consisted of 21 patients who received TNM at home also for 15 days. The severity of fecal incontinence was determined using the Wexner score. The functional state of the sphincter before and after surgery was assessed using the anorectal manometry (sphincterometry) (WPM Solar, the Netherlands). RESULTS Comprehensive rehabilitation resulted in a statistically significant clinical improvement: a decrease in the Wexner score in both males and females. No significant differences in manometry results were observed: the anal sphincter tone increased by 16.0% in females and 10.6% in males, and contractility increased by 17.7% and 15.1%, respectively. Monotherapy with TNM in control group patients improved tone indices by 8.7% in females and 6.8% in males, and contractility by 6.2 and 5.4%, respectively, which was lower than in the main group. CONCLUSION Contraindications to physiotherapeutic procedures based on electrical stimulation, extracorporeal magnetic stimulation, and magnetic translumbosacral neuromodulation determine the only possible choice of medical rehabilitation, which is the combination of biofeedback training and TNM (as superior to TNM monotherapy). If out-patient medical rehabilitation is not feasible, patients are recommended to complement the home course with a specially designed set of exercises for anal incontinence treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Yu Fomenko
- A. N. Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology, Moscow, Russia
| | - S A Frolov
- A. N. Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology, Moscow, Russia
| | - V N Kashnikov
- A. N. Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology, Moscow, Russia
| | - A M Kuzminov
- A. N. Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology, Moscow, Russia
| | - S V Belousova
- A. N. Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology, Moscow, Russia
| | - V A Kozlov
- A. N. Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology, Moscow, Russia
| | - V Yu Korolik
- A. N. Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology, Moscow, Russia
| | - I A Mukhin
- A. N. Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology, Moscow, Russia
| | - M A Nekrasov
- A. N. Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Xiang X, Sharma A, Patcharatrakul T, Yan Y, Karunaratne T, Parr R, Ayyala DN, Hall P, Rao SSC. Randomized controlled trial of home biofeedback therapy versus office biofeedback therapy for fecal incontinence. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2021; 33:e14168. [PMID: 34051120 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Revised: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Biofeedback therapy is useful for treatment of fecal incontinence (FI), but is not widely available and labor intensive. We investigated if home biofeedback therapy (HBT) is non-inferior to office biofeedback therapy (OBT). METHODS Patients with FI (≥1 episode/week) were randomized to HBT or OBT for 6 weeks. HBT was performed daily using novel device that provided resistance training and electrical stimulation with voice-guided instructions. OBT consisted of six weekly sessions. Both methods involved anal strength, endurance, and coordination training. Primary outcome was change in weekly FI episodes. FI improvement was assessed with stool diaries, validated instruments (FISI, FISS, and ICIQ-B), and anorectal manometry using intention-to-treat analysis. KEY RESULTS Thirty (F/M = 26/4) FI patients (20 in HBT, 10 in OBT) participated. Weekly FI episodes decreased significantly after HBT (Δ ± 95% confidence interval: 4.7 ± 1.8, compared with baseline, p = 0.003) and OBT (3.7 ± 1.6, p = 0.0003) and HBT was non-inferior to OBT (p = 0.2). The FISI and FISS scores improved significantly in HBT group (p < 0.02). Bowel pattern, bowel control, and quality of life (QOL) domains (ICIQ-B) improved significantly in HBT arm (p < 0.023). Resting and maximum squeeze sphincter pressures significantly improved in both HBT and OBT groups and sustained squeeze pressure in HBT, without group differences. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES Home biofeedback therapy is non-inferior to OBT for FI treatment. Home biofeedback is safe, effective, improves QOL, and through increased access could facilitate improved management of FI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuelian Xiang
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Amol Sharma
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Tanisa Patcharatrakul
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Yun Yan
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Tennekoon Karunaratne
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Rachel Parr
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Deepak Nag Ayyala
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Patricia Hall
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Satish S C Rao
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
ACG Clinical Guidelines: Management of Benign Anorectal Disorders. Am J Gastroenterol 2021; 116:1987-2008. [PMID: 34618700 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Benign anorectal disorders of structure and function are common in clinical practice. These guidelines summarize the preferred approach to the evaluation and management of defecation disorders, proctalgia syndromes, hemorrhoids, anal fissures, and fecal incontinence in adults and represent the official practice recommendations of the American College of Gastroenterology. The scientific evidence for these guidelines was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation process. When the evidence was not appropriate for Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation, we used expert consensus to develop key concept statements. These guidelines should be considered as preferred but are not the only approaches to these conditions.
Collapse
|
24
|
Meyer I, Richter HE. Accidental Bowel Leakage/Fecal Incontinence: Evidence-Based Management. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2021; 48:467-485. [PMID: 34416932 DOI: 10.1016/j.ogc.2021.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Fecal incontinence is a highly prevalent and debilitating condition that negatively impacts quality of life. The etiology is often multifactorial and treatment can be hindered by lack of understanding of its mechanisms and available treatment options. This article reviews the evidence-based update for the management of fecal incontinence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isuzu Meyer
- Division of Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1700 6th Avenue South, Suite 10382, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA.
| | - Holly E Richter
- Division of Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1700 6th Avenue South, Suite 10382, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Bharucha AE, Gantz MG, Rao SS, Lowry AC, Chua H, Karunaratne T, Wu J, Hamilton FA, Whitehead WE. Comparative effectiveness of biofeedback and injectable bulking agents for treatment of fecal incontinence: Design and methods. Contemp Clin Trials 2021; 107:106464. [PMID: 34139357 PMCID: PMC8429255 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2020] [Revised: 05/08/2021] [Accepted: 05/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Fecal incontinence (FI), the involuntary passage of stool, is common and can markedly impair the quality of life. Among patients who fail initial options (pads or protective devices, bowel modifying agents, and pelvic floor exercises), the options are pelvic floor biofeedback (BIO), perianal injection with bulking agents (INJ), and sacral nerve electrical stimulation (SNS), which have not been subjected to head-to-head comparisons. This study will compare the safety and efficacy of BIO and INJ for managing FI. The impact of these approaches on quality-of-life and psychological distress, cost effectiveness, and predictors of response to therapy will also be evaluated. Six centers in the United States will enroll approximately 285 patients with moderate to severe FI. Patients who have 4 or more FI episodes over 2 weeks proceed to a 4-week trial of enhanced medical management (EMM) (ie, education, bowel management, and pelvic floor exercises). Thereafter, 194 non-responders as defined by a less than 75% reduction in the frequency of FI will be randomized to BIO or INJ. Three months later, the efficacy, safety, and cost of therapy will be assessed; non-responders will be invited to choose to add the other treatment or SNS for the remainder of the study. Early EMM responders will be re-evaluated 3 months later and non-responders randomized to BIO or INJ. Standardized, and where appropriate validated approaches will be used for study procedures, which will be performed by trained personnel. Prospectively collected data on care costs and resource utilization will be used for cost effectiveness analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adil E. Bharucha
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Mn
| | - Marie G. Gantz
- Biostatistics and Epidemiology Division, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC
| | - Satish S. Rao
- Division of Gastroenterology, Augusta University, Augusta, Ga
| | - Ann C. Lowry
- Colon and Rectal Surgery Associates, Minneapolis, Mn
| | - Heidi Chua
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Mn
| | | | - Jennifer Wu
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Frank A. Hamilton
- National Institute of Digestive Diseases, Kidney, and Diabetes, Bethesda, MD
| | - William E. Whitehead
- Center for Functional GI and Motility Disorders, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Mazor Y, Prott G, Jones M, Ejova A, Kellow J, Malcom A. Factors Associated With Response to Anorectal Biofeedback Therapy in Patients With Fecal Incontinence. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 19:492-502.e5. [PMID: 32251788 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.03.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2019] [Revised: 03/06/2020] [Accepted: 03/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Anorectal biofeedback (BF) is commonly used to treat patients with fecal incontinence (FI), but demand usually exceeds availability. It is therefore important to identify patients most likely to respond to BF treatment. We aimed to identify pre-treatment clinical or physiologic factors that might be used to predict completion and success of BF in women with FI. METHODS We analyzed data from 400 women with FI (mean age, 61 ± 14 y) undergoing instrumental BF in a tertiary care setting from 2003 through 2016. All patients completed questionnaires before BF, including Rome and the hospital anxiety and depression scale questionnaires. Histories of medication use, surgery, medical conditions, and bowel pattern were recorded, urge was assessed, and patients kept stool diaries. Before and after treatment (6 weekly sessions with a gastroenterologist-supervised nurse specialist, 4 involving instrumented anorectal biofeedback), patients were examined by a physician and fecal incontinence severity index and visual analogue scale scores were recorded. The main outcome measure was response to therapy, defined as improvement of 50% or more in weekly FI episodes at the end of BF compared with before BF. RESULTS The BF treatment was completed by 363 women (91%); of these, 62 had low baseline symptom frequency (no FI episodes in the 2 weeks before BF). Younger age was associated with failure to complete treatment. Of the 301 patients remaining, 202 patients (67%) had a response to therapy; among these women, urge FI was associated with response at end of BF, but not at follow up (6 months after therapy). Baseline severity of symptom scores and quality of life measures were associated with greater improvement in the same variable at the end of BF and after 6 months. Patients with low baseline symptom frequency improved in all secondary outcome measures, similar to patients with higher baseline symptom frequency. CONCLUSIONS In an analysis of 363 women with FI, approximately two-thirds had a response to BF treatment. Urge FI was the only baseline variable associated with response. Baseline severity of symptoms and quality of life measures were associated with greater improvement in the same variable, but not overall response. It is therefore a challenge to select treatment for patients with FI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoav Mazor
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW; University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW.
| | - Gillian Prott
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW
| | - Michael Jones
- Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Anastasia Ejova
- Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - John Kellow
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW; University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW
| | - Allison Malcom
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW; University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Nurse- and Pelvic Floor Physical Therapist-Led Bowel Training in Patients With Fecal Incontinence in a Tertiary Care Center. Gastroenterol Nurs 2021; 44:39-46. [PMID: 33538522 DOI: 10.1097/sga.0000000000000498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2019] [Accepted: 10/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Little is known about nurse- and pelvic floor physical therapist-led bowel training in fecal incontinence after previous conservative management has been deemed unsatisfactory. The objective of this study was to evaluate combined nurse- and physical therapist-led bowel training sessions in a tertiary care center. This was a prospective, cross-sectional study. All patients with fecal incontinence between 2015 and 2016 with and without previous conservative management were included. Combined conservative treatment was defined as the use of stool-bulking agents (psyllium fibers) with or without antidiarrheal medication (loperamide) in combination with biofeedback or pelvic floor muscle training. Questionnaires regarding fecal incontinence (Vaizey incontinence score) and quality of life (Short Form Health Survey-36) were used. A decrease in the Vaizey incontinence score of 5 or more points was deemed to be clinically significant. Vaizey incontinence scores in all 50 patients decreased from 14.7 (SD = 4.5) to 9.9 (SD = 4.8) at follow-up (p < .001). Forty percent of patients reported an improvement in their Vaizey incontinence score (change of 5 or more points). Improvement was noted in those with and without previous treatment. Quality of life improved significantly. The limitation of the study includes lack of a standardized treatment protocol. Fecal incontinence reduced after nurse- and physical therapist-led bowel training sessions in patients with and without previous treatment, increasing their quality of life.
Collapse
|
28
|
Mundet L, Rofes L, Ortega O, Cabib C, Clavé P. Kegel Exercises, Biofeedback, Electrostimulation, and Peripheral Neuromodulation Improve Clinical Symptoms of Fecal Incontinence and Affect Specific Physiological Targets: An Randomized Controlled Trial. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2021; 27:108-118. [PMID: 33109777 PMCID: PMC7786087 DOI: 10.5056/jnm20013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2020] [Revised: 04/16/2020] [Accepted: 07/03/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background/Aims Fecal incontinence (FI) is a prevalent condition among community-dwelling women, and has a major impact on quality of life (QoL). Research on treatments commonly used in clinical practice—Kegel exercises, biofeedback, electrostimulation, and transcutaneous neuromodulation—give discordant results and some lack methodological rigor, making scientific evidence weak. The aim is to assess the clinical efficacy of these 4 treatments on community-dwelling women with FI and their impact on severity, QoL and anorectal physiology. Methods A randomized controlled trial was conducted on 150 females with FI assessed with anorectal manometry and endoanal ultrasonography, and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency, anal/rectal sensory-evoked-potentials, clinical severity, and QoL were determined. Patients were randomly assigned to one of the following groups Kegel (control), biofeedback + Kegel, electrostimulation + Kegel, and neuromodulation + Kegel, treated for 3 months and re-evaluated, then followed up after 6 months. Results Mean age was 61.09 ± 12.17. Severity of FI and QoL was significantly improved in a similar way after all treatments. The effect on physiology was treatment-specific Kegel and electrostimulation + Kegel, increased resting pressure (P < 0.05). Squeeze pressures strongly augmented with biofeedback + Kegel, electrostimulation + Kegel and neuromodulation + Kegel (P < 0.01). Endurance of squeeze increased in biofeedback + Kegel and electrostimulation + Kegel (P < 0.01). Rectal perception threshold was reduced in the biofeedback + Kegel, electrostimulation + Kegel, and neuromodulation + Kegel (P < 0.05); anal sensory-evoked-potentials latency shortened in patients with electrostimulation + Kegel (P < 0.05). Conclusions The treatments for FI assessed have a strong and similar efficacy on severity and QoL but affect specific pathophysiological mechanisms. This therapeutic specificity can help to develop more efficient multimodal algorithm treatments for FI based on pathophysiological phenotypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lluís Mundet
- Gastrointestinal Physiology Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Hospital de Mataró, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Mataró, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de enfermedades hepáticas y digestivas (CIBERehd), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laia Rofes
- Gastrointestinal Physiology Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Hospital de Mataró, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Mataró, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de enfermedades hepáticas y digestivas (CIBERehd), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain.,Neos Surgery, Parc Tecnològic del Vallès, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Omar Ortega
- Gastrointestinal Physiology Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Hospital de Mataró, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Mataró, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de enfermedades hepáticas y digestivas (CIBERehd), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Christopher Cabib
- Gastrointestinal Physiology Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Hospital de Mataró, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Mataró, Spain
| | - Pere Clavé
- Gastrointestinal Physiology Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Hospital de Mataró, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Mataró, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de enfermedades hepáticas y digestivas (CIBERehd), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Maeda K, Mimura T, Yoshioka K, Seki M, Katsuno H, Takao Y, Tsunoda A, Yamana T. Japanese Practice Guidelines for Fecal Incontinence Part 2-Examination and Conservative Treatment for Fecal Incontinence- English Version. J Anus Rectum Colon 2021; 5:67-83. [PMID: 33537502 PMCID: PMC7843146 DOI: 10.23922/jarc.2020-079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Examination for fecal incontinence is performed in order to evaluate the condition of each patient. As there is no single method that perfectly assesses this condition, there are several tests that need to be conducted. These are as follows: anal manometry, recto anal sensitivity test, pudendal nerve terminal motor latency, electromyogram, anal endosonography, pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan, and defecography. In addition, the mental and physical stress most patients experience during all these examinations needs to be taken into consideration. Although some of these examinations mostly apply for patients with constipation, we hereby describe these tests as tools for the assessment of fecal incontinence. Conservative therapies for fecal incontinence include diet, lifestyle, and bowel habit modification, pharmacotherapy, pelvic floor muscle training, biofeedback therapy, anal insert device, trans anal irrigation, and so on. These interventions have been identified to improve the symptoms of fecal incontinence by determining the mechanisms resulting in firmer stool consistency; strengthening the pelvic floor muscles, including the external anal sphincter; normalizing the rectal sensation; or periodic emptying of the colon and rectum. Among these interventions, diet, lifestyle, and bowel habit modifications and pharmacotherapy can be performed with some degree of knowledge and experience. These two therapies, therefore, can be conducted by all physicians, including general practitioners and other physicians not specializing in fecal incontinence. However, patients with fecal incontinence who did not improve following these initial therapies should be referred to specialized institutions. Contrary to the initial therapies, specialized therapies, including pelvic floor muscle training, biofeedback therapy, anal insert device, and trans anal irrigation, should be conducted in specialized institutions as these require patient education and instructions based on expert knowledge and experience. In general, conservative therapies should be performed for fecal incontinence before surgery because its pathophysiologies are mostly attributed to benign conditions. All Japanese healthcare professionals who take care of patients with fecal incontinence are expected to understand the characteristics of each conservative therapy, so that appropriate therapies will be selected and performed. Therefore, in this chapter, the characteristics of each conservative therapy for fecal incontinence are described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kotaro Maeda
- International Medical Center Fujita Health University Hospital, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Toshiki Mimura
- Department of Surgery, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Yoshioka
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Medical University Medical Center, Osaka, Japan
| | - Mihoko Seki
- Nursing Division, Tokyo Yamate Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hidetoshi Katsuno
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University Okazaki Medical Center, Okazaki, Japan
| | - Yoshihiko Takao
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Sanno Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akira Tsunoda
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Yamana
- Department of Coloproctology, Tokyo Yamate Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
The Prevalence of Enteropathy Symptoms from the Lower Gastrointestinal Tract and the Evaluation of Anorectal Function in Diabetes Mellitus Patients. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10030415. [PMID: 33499216 PMCID: PMC7866006 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10030415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Revised: 01/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Complications affecting the gastrointestinal tract often occur in the course of diabetes mellitus (DM). The aim of this study was to evaluate enteropathy symptoms and anorectal function using high-resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM). Fifty DM patients and 20 non-DM controls were enrolled into the study. Clinical data and laboratory tests were collected, physical examination and HRAM were performed. Symptoms in the lower gastrointestinal tract were reported by 72% of patients. DM patients with a long disease duration reported anal region discomfort (p = 0.028) and a sensation of incomplete evacuation (p = 0.036) more often than patients with shorter diabetes duration. Overall, DM patients had a lower maximal squeeze pressure (MSP) (p = 0.001) and a higher mean threshold of minimal rectal sensation (p < 0.01) than control subjects. They presented with enhanced features of dyssynergic defection than the control group. MSP and maximal resting pressure (MRP) were significantly lower in the group of long-term diabetes (p = 0.024; p = 0.026 respectively) than in patients with a short-term diabetes. The same observation was noted for patients with enteropathy symptoms that control for MSP (p < 0.01; p < 0.01; p = 0.03) and MRP (p < 0.001; p = 0.0036; p = 0.0046), respectively, for incontinence, constipation, and diarrhea. Symptoms in the lower gastrointestinal tract are often reported by DM patients. All DM patients have impaired function of the external anal sphincter and present enhanced features of dyssynergic defecation and also impaired visceral sensation. Patients with long-standing DM and patients with enteropathy symptoms have severely impaired function of both anal sphincters.
Collapse
|
31
|
Katuwal B, Bhullar J. Current Position of Sacral Neuromodulation in Treatment of Fecal Incontinence. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2021; 34:22-27. [PMID: 33536846 PMCID: PMC7843948 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1714247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Fecal incontinence (FI) is defined as uncontrolled passage of feces or gas for at least 1-month duration in an individual who previously had control. FI is a common and debilitating condition affecting many individuals. Continence depends on complex relationships between anal sphincters, rectal curvatures, rectoanal sensation, rectal compliance, stool consistency, and neurologic function. Factors, such as pregnancy, chronic diarrhea, diabetes mellitus, previous anorectal surgery, urinary incontinence, smoking, obesity, limited physical activity, white race, and neurologic disease, are known to be the risk factors for FI. Conservative/medical management including biofeedback are recognized as the first-line treatment of the FI. Those who are suitable for surgical intervention and who have failed conservative management, sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) has emerged as the treatment of choice in many patients. The surgical technique involves placement of a tined lead with four electrodes through the S3 sacral foramen. The lead is attached to a battery, which acts as a pulse generator, and is placed under the patient's skin in the lower lumbar region. The use of SNS in the treatment of FI has increased over the years and the beneficial effects of this treatment have been substantiated by multiple studies. This review describes SNS as a modality of treatment for FI and its position in the current medical diaspora in patients with FI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Binit Katuwal
- Department of Surgery, Providence Hospital & Medical Centers, Southfield, Michigan
| | - Jasneet Bhullar
- Department of Surgery, UPMC Williamsport, Williamsport, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
D’Amico F, Wexner SD, Vaizey CJ, Gouynou C, Danese S, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Tools for fecal incontinence assessment: lessons for inflammatory bowel disease trials based on a systematic review. United European Gastroenterol J 2020; 8:886-922. [PMID: 32677555 PMCID: PMC7707876 DOI: 10.1177/2050640620943699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fecal incontinence is a disabling condition affecting up to 20% of women. OBJECTIVE We investigated fecal incontinence assessment in both inflammatory bowel disease and non-inflammatory bowel disease patients to propose a diagnostic approach for inflammatory bowel disease trials. METHODS We searched on Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Library for all studies on adult inflammatory bowel disease and non-inflammatory bowel disease patients reporting data on fecal incontinence assessment from January 2009 to December 2019. RESULTS In total, 328 studies were included; 306 studies enrolled non-inflammatory bowel disease patients and 22 studies enrolled inflammatory bowel disease patients. In non-inflammatory bowel disease trials the most used tools were the Wexner score, fecal incontinence quality of life questionnaire, Vaizey score and fecal incontinence severity index (in 187, 91, 62 and 33 studies). Anal manometry was adopted in 41.2% and endoanal ultrasonography in 34.0% of the studies. In 142 studies (46.4%) fecal incontinence evaluation was performed with a single instrument, while in 64 (20.9%) and 100 (32.7%) studies two or more instruments were used. In inflammatory bowel disease studies the Wexner score, Vaizey score and inflammatory bowel disease quality of life questionnaire were the most commonly adopted tools (in five (22.7%), five (22.7%) and four (18.2%) studies). Anal manometry and endoanal ultrasonography were performed in 45.4% and 18.2% of the studies. CONCLUSION Based on prior validation and experience, we propose to use the Wexner score as the first step for fecal incontinence assessment in inflammatory bowel disease trials. Anal manometry and/or endoanal ultrasonography should be taken into account in the case of positive questionnaires.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ferdinando D’Amico
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- Department of Gastroenterology and Inserm NGERE U1256, University Hospital of Nancy, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Steven D Wexner
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston USA
| | | | - Célia Gouynou
- Department of Gastroenterology and Inserm NGERE U1256, University Hospital of Nancy, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Silvio Danese
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- IBD Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center-IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
- Department of Gastroenterology and Inserm NGERE U1256, University Hospital of Nancy, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
Defecatory disorders can include structural, neurological, and functional disorders in addition to concomitant symptoms of fecal incontinence, functional anorectal pain, and pelvic floor dyssynergia. These disorders greatly affect quality of life and healthcare costs. Treatment for pelvic floor disorders can include medications, botulinum toxin, surgery, physical therapy, and biofeedback. Pelvic floor muscle training for pelvic floor disorders aims to enhance strength, speed, and/or endurance or coordination of voluntary anal sphincter and pelvic floor muscle contractions. Biofeedback therapy builds on physical therapy by incorporating the use of equipment to record or amplify activities of the body and feed the information back to the patients. Biofeedback has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of chronic constipation with dyssynergic defecation, fecal incontinence, and low anterior resection syndrome. Evidence for the use of biofeedback in levator ani syndrome is conflicting. In comparing biofeedback to pelvic floor muscle training alone, studies suggest that biofeedback is superior therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Hite
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Thomas Curran
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Serra J, Pohl D, Azpiroz F, Chiarioni G, Ducrotté P, Gourcerol G, Hungin APS, Layer P, Mendive JM, Pfeifer J, Rogler G, Scott M, Simrén M, Whorwell P. Responses to the Letter to the Editor by Brusciano et al. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2020; 32:e13981. [PMID: 32856764 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.13981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 08/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jordi Serra
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Barcelona, Spain
- Motility and Functional Gut Disorders Unit, University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Daniel Pohl
- Division of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Fernando Azpiroz
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Barcelona, Spain
- Digestive System Research Unit, University Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Giuseppe Chiarioni
- Division of Gastroenterology B, AOUI Verona, Verona, Italy
- UNC Center for Functional GI and Motility Disorders, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Philippe Ducrotté
- Department of Gastroenterology, UMR INSERM 1073, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Guillaume Gourcerol
- Department of Physiology, UMR INSERM 1073 & CIC INSERM 1404, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Amrit Pali S Hungin
- General Practice, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Peter Layer
- Department of Medicine, Israelitic Hospital, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Juan-Manuel Mendive
- La Mina Primary Health Care Centre, Barcelona, Spain
- Catalan Institut of Health (ICS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Johann Pfeifer
- Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Gerhard Rogler
- Division of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Mark Scott
- Neurogastroenterology Group, Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery and Trauma, Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University London, London, UK
| | - Magnus Simrén
- Department of Internal Medicine & Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Peter Whorwell
- Neurogastroenterology Unit, Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology & Gastroenterology, Wythenshawe Hospital, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To review the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical features, and management of primary constipation and fecal incontinence in the elderly. RECENT FINDINGS Among elderly people, 6.5%, 1.7%, and 1.1% have functional constipation, constipation-predominant IBS, and opioid-induced constipation. In elderly people, the number of colonic enteric neurons and smooth muscle functions is preserved; decreased cholinergic function with unopposed nitrergic relaxation may explain colonic motor dysfunction. Less physical activity or dietary fiber intake and postmenopausal hormonal therapy are risk factors for fecal incontinence in elderly people. Two thirds of patients with fecal incontinence respond to biofeedback therapy. Used in combination, loperamide and biofeedback therapy are more effective than placebo, education, and biofeedback therapy. Vaginal or anal insert devices are another option. In the elderly, constipation and fecal incontinence are common and often distressing symptoms that can often be managed by addressing bowel disturbances. Selected diagnostic tests, prescription medications, and, infrequently, surgical options should be considered when necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brototo Deb
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - David O Prichard
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Adil E Bharucha
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Mazor Y, Prott GM, Sequeira C, Jones M, Ejova A, Kellow JE, Schnitzler M, Malcolm A. A novel combined anorectal biofeedback and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation protocol for treating fecal incontinence. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2020; 13:1756284820916388. [PMID: 32577132 PMCID: PMC7288816 DOI: 10.1177/1756284820916388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2019] [Accepted: 03/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Fecal incontinence (FI) is a common, debilitating condition that causes major impact on quality of life for those affected. Non-surgical treatment options include anorectal biofeedback therapy (BF) and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS), usually performed separately. The aims of the current study were to determine the feasibility, tolerability, safety, and efficacy of performing a combined BF and PTNS treatment protocol. METHODS Female patients with urge FI were offered a novel pilot program combining BF with PTNS. The treatment protocol consisted of 13 weekly sessions: an educational session, followed by 5 combined BF and PTNS sessions, 6 PTNS and a final combined session. Anorectal physiology and clinical outcomes were assessed throughout the program. For efficacy, patients were compared with BF only historical FI patients matched for age, parity, and severity of symptoms. RESULTS A total of 12/13 (93%) patients completed the full program. Overall attendance rate was 93% (157/169 sessions). Patient comfort score with treatment was rated high at 9.8/10 (SD 0.7) for PTNS and 8.6/10 (SD 1.7) for the BF component. No major side effects were reported. A reduction of at least 50% in FI episodes/week was achieved by 58% of patients by visit 6, and 92% by visit 13. No physiology changes were evident immediately following PTNS compared with before, but pressure during sustained anal squeeze improved by the end of the treatment course. Comparing outcomes with historical matched controls, reductions in weekly FI episodes were more pronounced in the BF only group at visit 6, but not week 13. CONCLUSIONS In this pilot study, concurrent PTNS and anorectal biofeedback therapy has been shown to be feasible, comfortable, and low risk. The combined protocol is likely to be an effective treatment for FI, but future research could focus on optimizing patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gillian M. Prott
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - Carol Sequeira
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - Michael Jones
- Psychology Department, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Anastasia Ejova
- Psychology Department, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - John E. Kellow
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia,Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia,Northern Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Margaret Schnitzler
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia,Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia,Northern Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Allison Malcolm
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia,Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia,Northern Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Cabrera AMG, Juan FDLPD, Rodríguez RMJ, Díaz MLR, Ruiz FJP. Incontinencia fecal. FMC - FORMACIÓN MÉDICA CONTINUADA EN ATENCIÓN PRIMARIA 2020; 27:134-138. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fmc.2019.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/17/2025]
|
38
|
Whitehead WE, Simren M, Busby-Whitehead J, Heymen S, van Tilburg MAL, Sperber AD, Palsson OS. Fecal Incontinence Diagnosed by the Rome IV Criteria in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18:385-391. [PMID: 31154029 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.05.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2019] [Revised: 05/06/2019] [Accepted: 05/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS The diagnostic criteria for fecal incontinence (FI) were made more restrictive in the Rome IV revision. We aimed to determine the characteristics of FI patients defined by the Rome IV criteria, assess how FI frequency and amount affect quality of life, identify risk factors, and compare prevalence values among countries. METHODS We performed an internet-based survey of 5931 subjects in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom, from September to December 2015. Subjects were stratified by country, sex, and age. Responders answered questions about diagnosis, health care use, and risk factors. We performed multivariate linear regression analysis to identify risk factors for FI. RESULTS FI was reported by 957 subjects (16.1%) but only 196 (3.3%) fulfilled the Rome IV criteria. Frequency of FI was less than twice a month for 672/957 subjects (70.2%) and duration was less than 6 months for 285/957 subjects (29.8%). Quality of life was significantly impaired in all subjects with FI compared to subjects with fecal continence. The strongest risk factors for FI were diarrhea, urgency to defecate, and abdominal pain. FI was more prevalent in the United States than in the United Kingdom. Between-country differences were due to less diarrhea and urgency in the United Kingdom. CONCLUSIONS Rome IV FI prevalence is lower than previous estimates because the new criteria exclude many individuals with less frequent or short duration FI. These excluded patients have impaired quality of life. It might be appropriate to make a diagnosis of FI for all patients with FI ≥2 times in 3 months and to provide additional information on frequency, duration, and amount of stool lost to assist clinicians in treatment selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William E Whitehead
- Center for Functional Gastrointestinal and Motility Disorders, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
| | - Magnus Simren
- Center for Functional Gastrointestinal and Motility Disorders, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Jan Busby-Whitehead
- Center for Aging and Health, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Steve Heymen
- Center for Functional Gastrointestinal and Motility Disorders, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Miranda A L van Tilburg
- Center for Functional Gastrointestinal and Motility Disorders, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Department of Clinical Research, College of Pharmacy & Health Sciences, Campbell University, Buies Creek, North Carolina; School of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Ami D Sperber
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Olafur S Palsson
- Center for Functional Gastrointestinal and Motility Disorders, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Kalkdijk-Dijkstra A, van der Heijden J, van Westreenen H, Broens P, Trzpis M, Pierie J, Klarenbeek B. Pelvic floor rehabilitation to improve functional outcome and quality of life after surgery for rectal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (FORCE trial). Trials 2020; 21:112. [PMID: 31992358 PMCID: PMC6988240 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-4043-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2019] [Accepted: 12/30/2019] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND After low anterior resection (LAR), up to 90% of patients develop anorectal dysfunction. Especially fecal incontinence has a major impact on the physical, psychological, social, and emotional functioning of the patient but also on the Dutch National Healthcare budget with more than €2000 spent per patient per year. No standardized treatment is available to help these patients. Common treatment nowadays is focused on symptom relief, consisting of lifestyle advices and pharmacotherapy with bulking agents or antidiarrheal medication. Another possibility is pelvic floor rehabilitation (PFR), which is one of the most important treatments for fecal incontinence in general, with success rates of 50-80%. No strong evidence is available for the use of PFR after LAR. This study aims to prove a beneficial effect of PFR on fecal incontinence, quality of life, and costs in rectal cancer patients after sphincter-saving surgery compared to standard treatment. METHODS The FORCE trial is a multicenter, two-armed, randomized clinical trial. All patients that underwent LAR are recruited from the participating hospitals and randomized for either standard treatment or a standardized PFR program. A total of 128 patients should be randomized. Optimal blinding is not possible. Stratification will be done in variable blocks (gender and additional radiotherapy). The primary endpoint is the Wexner incontinence score; secondary endpoints are health-related and fecal-incontinence-related QoL and cost-effectiveness. Baseline measurements take place before randomization. The primary endpoint is measured 3 months after the start of the intervention, with a 1-year follow-up for sustainability research purposes. DISCUSSION The results of this study may substantially improve postoperative care for patients with fecal incontinence or anorectal dysfunction after LAR. This section provides insight in the decisions that were made in the organization of this trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION Netherlands Trial Registration, NTR5469, registered on 03-09-2015. Protocol FORCE trial V18, 19-09-2019. Sponsor Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - P.M.A. Broens
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - M. Trzpis
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - J.P.E.N. Pierie
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of PGSoM, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - B.R. Klarenbeek
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Evaluation of Smartphone Pelvic Floor Exercise Applications Using Standardized Scoring System. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2020; 25:328-335. [PMID: 29489554 DOI: 10.1097/spv.0000000000000563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to identify smartphone Kegel and pelvic floor exercise applications (apps) and identify those with superior functionality, features, and accuracy. METHODS We identified a complete list of Kegel and pelvic floor exercise applications by searching iTunes and Google Play stores for "pelvic floor," "pelvic floor exercises," "Kegel," and "Kegel exercises." We used a modified APPLICATIONS scoring system to evaluate all identified apps. RESULTS We identified 120 apps related to Kegel exercises. Apps unrelated to the pelvic floor, unavailable in English, or duplicated on a separate platform were excluded from the analysis, leaving 90 unique apps. After a preliminary review, we excluded an additional 58 apps that were nonfunctional, required a biofeedback device, or intended for pregnant women. The final 32 apps included 15 paid and 17 free apps. Paid apps had higher rates of privacy features than free apps (80% vs 53%), used more images and figures (53% vs 41%), and were more likely to cite primary literature in their descriptions (33% vs 29%). Paid apps were also more likely to have tech support available (73% vs 53%). Overall score, however, was almost identical between the groups, with paid apps averaging 9.93 and free apps 9.41. The highest rated free and paid app both received a score of 12, consisting of Kegel Trainer and Kegel Trainer Pro, respectively. CONCLUSION The quality of the apps is markedly variable in both the paid and unpaid applications. Using the APPLICATIONS scoring system, the apps were very similar in overall quality and value.
Collapse
|
41
|
Zifan A, Mittal RK, Kunkel DC, Swartz J, Barr G, Tuttle LJ. Loop analysis of the anal sphincter complex in fecal incontinent patients using functional luminal imaging probe. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2020; 318:G66-G76. [PMID: 31736339 PMCID: PMC6985842 DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00164.2019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Cardiac loops have been used extensively to study myocardial function. With changes in cardiac pump function, loops are shifted to the right or left. Functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) recordings allow for loop analysis of the anal sphincter and puborectalis muscle (PRM) function. The goal was to characterize anal sphincter area-pressure/tension loop changes in fecal incontinence (FI) patients. Fourteen healthy subjects and 14 patients with FI were studied. A custom-designed FLIP was placed in the vagina and then in the anal canal, and deflated in 20-ml steps, from 90 to 30 ml. At each volume, subjects performed maximal voluntary squeezes. Area-pressure (AP) and area-tension (AT) loops were generated for each squeeze cycle. Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging of the anal sphincter and PRM were obtained to determine the relationship between anal sphincter muscle damage and loop movements. With the increase in bag volume, AP loops and AT loops shifted to the right and upward in normal subjects (both anal and vaginal). The shift to the right was greater, and the upward movement was less in FI patients. The difference in the location of AP loops and AT loops was statistically significant at volumes of 50 ml to 90 ml (P < 0.05). A similar pattern was found in the vaginal loops. There is a significant relationship between the damage to the anal sphincter and PRM, and loop location of FI patients. We propose AP and AT loops as novel ways to assess the anal sphincter and PRM function. Such loops can be generated by real-time measurement of pressure and area within the anal canal.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We describe the use of area-pressure (AP) and area-tension (AT)-loop analysis of the anal sphincters and puborectalis muscles in normal subjects and fecal incontinent patients using the functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP). There are differences in the magnitude of the displacement of the loops with increase in the FLIP bag volume between normal subjects and patients with fecal incontinence. The latter group shifts more to the right in AP and AT space.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Zifan
- 1Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, California
| | - Ravinder K. Mittal
- 1Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, California
| | - David C. Kunkel
- 1Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, California
| | - Jessica Swartz
- 2Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, School of Exercise and Nutritional Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, California
| | - Garrett Barr
- 2Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, School of Exercise and Nutritional Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, California
| | - Lori J. Tuttle
- 2Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, School of Exercise and Nutritional Sciences, San Diego State University, San Diego, California
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Gupta A, Hobson DTG, Petro M, Al-Juburi A, Francis S, Abell TL. Can Baseline Electromyography Predict Response to Biofeedback for Anorectal Disorder? A Long-Term Follow-Up Study. Gastroenterology Res 2019; 12:252-255. [PMID: 31636775 PMCID: PMC6785285 DOI: 10.14740/gr1213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2019] [Accepted: 08/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Biofeedback has been recommended for the treatment of anorectal disorders, especially constipation and fecal incontinence (FI). The objective of this study was to assess the long-term efficacy of biofeedback and evaluate baseline electromyography (EMG) as a predictor for maintenance of long-term improvement. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed on randomly selected patients who underwent biofeedback between the years 1990 and 2000. Clinical characteristics, including EMG values at baseline (resting and contraction) as well as EMG after exercises, were collected. Patients were contacted and were classified as “improved” if they had self-reported symptomatic improvement and “not-improved” if their symptoms were unchanged or worsened. Results A total of 41 subjects were included. Majority (85.4%) were female, the mean age was 48.95 ± 15.46 (range 22 - 77 years) and the median follow-up was 4 years (range 4 - 5 years). Constipation was the primary indication for biofeedback in 27/41 (65.9%), FI in 9/41 (22%) and “other” in 5/41 (12.1%). Within constipation, 55.6% reported long-term improvement as compared to 66.7% of FI and 80% of the other patients. There was borderline difference in the baseline EMG (3.11 ± 1.85 µV, improved, and 7.41 ± 11.01 µV, not improved, P = 0.06) but no significant difference in post-exercise resting (3.13 ± 3.21 µV, improved, and 4.28 ± 3.63 µV, not improved, P = 0.33) and contraction EMG between the two groups. Conclusions Biofeedback is an important treatment tool in anorectal disorders. Over 50% of our subjects maintained their improvement 4 - 5 years after completing biofeedback therapy. A lower resting baseline EMG showed a trend of association with improvement in the long term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankita Gupta
- Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Deslyn T G Hobson
- Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA
| | | | - Amar Al-Juburi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Davis School of Medicine, University of California, Sacremento, CA, USA
| | - Sean Francis
- Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Thomas L Abell
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Ussing A, Dahn I, Due U, Sørensen M, Petersen J, Bandholm T. Efficacy of Supervised Pelvic Floor Muscle Training and Biofeedback vs Attention-Control Treatment in Adults With Fecal Incontinence. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 17:2253-2261.e4. [PMID: 30580089 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2018] [Revised: 12/05/2018] [Accepted: 12/11/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) in combination with conservative treatment is recommended as first-line treatment for patients with fecal incontinence, although its efficacy is unclear. We investigated whether supervised PFMT in combination with conservative treatment is superior to attention-control massage treatment and conservative treatment in adults with fecal incontinence. METHODS We performed a randomized, controlled, superiority trial of patients with fecal incontinence at a tertiary care center at a public hospital in Denmark. Ninety-eight adults with fecal incontinence were randomly assigned to groups that received supervised PFMT and biofeedback plus conservative treatment or attention-control treatment plus conservative treatment. The primary outcome was rating of symptom changes, after 16 weeks, based on scores from the Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale. Secondary outcomes were changes in the Vaizey incontinence score (Vaizey Score), Fecal Incontinence Severity Index, and Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale. RESULTS In the intention-to-treat analysis, participants in the PFMT group were significantly more likely to report improvement in incontinence symptoms based on Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale scores (unadjusted odds ratio, 5.16; 95% CI, 2.18-12.19; P = .0002). The PFMT group had a larger reduction in the mean Vaizey Score (reduction, -1.83 points; 95% CI, -3.57 to -0.08; P = .04). There were no significant differences in condition-specific quality of life. In the per-protocol analyses, the superiority of PFMT was increased. No adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS This randomized controlled trial of adults with fecal incontinence provides support for a superior effect of supervised PFMT in combination with conservative treatment compared with attention-control massage treatment and conservative treatment. We found that participants who received supervised PFMT had 5-fold higher odds of reporting improvements in fecal incontinence symptoms and had a larger mean reduction of incontinence severity based on the Vaizey Score compared with attention control massage treatment. Clinicaltrials.gov no: NCT01705535.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anja Ussing
- Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Herlev, Denmark; Optimed, Clinical Research Centre, Herlev, Denmark.
| | - Inge Dahn
- Department of Surgical and Medical Gastroenterology, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Ulla Due
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Herlev, Denmark; Department of Occupational and Physical Therapy, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Michael Sørensen
- Department of Surgical and Medical Gastroenterology, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Janne Petersen
- Optimed, Clinical Research Centre, Herlev, Denmark; Section of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Thomas Bandholm
- Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Herlev, Denmark; Optimed, Clinical Research Centre, Herlev, Denmark; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Research-Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Jelovsek JE, Markland AD, Whitehead WE, Barber MD, Newman DK, Rogers RG, Dyer K, Visco AG, Sutkin G, Zyczynski HM, Carper B, Meikle SF, Sung VW, Gantz MG. Controlling faecal incontinence in women by performing anal exercises with biofeedback or loperamide: a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 4:698-710. [PMID: 31320277 PMCID: PMC6708078 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(19)30193-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2019] [Revised: 05/08/2019] [Accepted: 05/09/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Well designed, large comparative effectiveness trials assessing the efficacy of primary interventions for faecal incontinence are few in number. The objectives of this study were to compare different combinations of anorectal manometry-assisted biofeedback, loperamide, education, and oral placebo. METHODS In this randomised factorial trial, participants were recruited from eight clinical sites in the USA. Women with at least one episode of faecal incontinence per month in the past 3 months were randomly assigned 0·5:1:1:1 to one of four groups: oral placebo plus education only, placebo plus anorectal manometry-assisted biofeedback, loperamide plus education only, and loperamide plus anorectal manometry-assisted biofeedback. Participants received 2 mg per day of loperamide or oral placebo with the option of dose escalation or reduction. Women assigned to biofeedback received six visits, including strength and sensory biofeedback training. All participants received a standardised faecal incontinence patient education pamphlet and were followed for 24 weeks after starting treatment. The primary endpoint was change in St Mark's (Vaizey) faecal incontinence severity score between baseline and 24 weeks, analysed by intention-to-treat using general linear mixed modelling. Investigators, interviewers, and outcome evaluators were masked to biofeedback assignment. Participants and all study staff other than the research pharmacist were masked to medication assignment. Randomisation took place within the electronic data capture system, was stratified by site using randomly permuted blocks (block size 7), and the sizes of the blocks and the allocation sequence were known only to the data coordinating centre. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02008565. FINDINGS Between April 1, 2014, and Sept 30, 2015, 377 women were enrolled, of whom 300 were randomly assigned to placebo plus education (n=42), placebo plus biofeedback (n=84), loperamide plus education (n=88), and the combined intervention of loperamide plus biofeedback (n=86). At 24 weeks, there were no differences between loperamide versus placebo (model estimated score change -1·5 points, 95% CI -3·4 to 0·4, p=0·12), biofeedback versus education (-0·7 points, -2·6 to 1·2, p=0·47), and loperamide and biofeedback versus placebo and biofeedback (-1·9 points, -4·1 to 0·3, p=0·092) or versus loperamide plus education (-1·1 points, -3·4 to 1·1, p=0·33). Constipation was the most common grade 3 or higher adverse event and was reported by two (2%) of 86 participants in the loperamide and biofeedback group and two (2%) of 88 in the loperamide plus education group. The percentage of participants with any serious adverse events did not differ between the treatment groups. Only one serious adverse event was considered related to treatment (small bowel obstruction in the placebo and biofeedback group). INTERPRETATION In women with normal stool consistency and faecal incontinence bothersome enough to seek treatment, we were unable to find evidence against the null hypotheses that loperamide is equivalent to placebo, that anal exercises with biofeedback is equivalent to an educational pamphlet, and that loperamide and biofeedback are equivalent to oral placebo and biofeedback or loperamide plus an educational pamphlet. Because these are common first-line treatments for faecal incontinence, clinicians could consider combining loperamide, anal manometry-assisted biofeedback, and a standard educational pamphlet, but this is likely to result in only negligible improvement over individual therapies and patients should be counselled regarding possible constipation. FUNDING Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the National Institutes of Health Office of Research on Women's Health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Eric Jelovsek
- Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Alayne D Markland
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA; Birmingham/Atlanta Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - William E Whitehead
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Matthew D Barber
- Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Diane K Newman
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Rebecca G Rogers
- Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Surgery, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA; Department of Women's Health, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Keisha Dyer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaiser Permanente, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Anthony G Visco
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Gary Sutkin
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Halina M Zyczynski
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | | | - Vivian W Sung
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Basnayake C, Kamm MA, Salzberg M, Khera A, Liew D, Burrell K, Wilson-O'Brien A, Stanley A, Talley NJ, Thompson AJ. Defining Optimal Care for Functional Gut Disorders - Multi-Disciplinary Versus Standard Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol. Contemp Clin Trials 2019; 84:105828. [PMID: 31437539 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.105828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2019] [Revised: 08/06/2019] [Accepted: 08/13/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) are the commonest reason for gastroenterological consultation, with patients usually seen by a specialist working in isolation. There is a wealth of evidence testifying to the benefit provided by dieticians, behavioral therapists, hypnotherapists and psychotherapists in treating these conditions, yet they rarely form a part of the therapeutic team, and these treatment modalities are rarely offered as part of the therapeutic management. There has been little examination of different models of care for FGIDs. We hypothesize that multi-disciplinary integrated care is superior to standard specialist-based care in the treatment of functional gut disorders. METHODS The "MANTRA" (Multidisciplinary Treatment for Functional Gut Disorders) study compares comprehensive multi-disciplinary outpatient care with standard hospital outpatient care. Consecutive new referrals to the gastroenterology and colorectal outpatient clinics of a single secondary and tertiary care hospital of patients with an FGID, defined by the Rome IV criteria, will be included. Patients will be prospectively randomized 2:1 to multi-disciplinary (gastroenterologist, gut-hypnotherapist, psychiatrist, behavioral therapist ('biofeedback') and dietician) or standard care (gastroenterologist or colorectal surgeon). Patients are assessed up to 12 months after completing treatment. The primary outcome is an improvement on a global assessment scale at the end of treatment. Symptoms, quality of life, psychological well-being, and healthcare costs are secondary outcome measures. DISCUSSION There have been few studies examining how best to deliver care for functional gut disorders. The MANTRA study will define the clinical and cost benefits of two different models of care for these highly prevalent disorders. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Clinicaltrials.govNCT03078634 Registered on Clinicaltrials.gov, completed recruitment, registered on March 13th 2017. Ethics and Dissemination: Ethical approval has been received by the St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne human research ethics committee (HREC-A 138/16). The results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and presented at international conferences. Protocol version 1.2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chamara Basnayake
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Michael A Kamm
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| | | | - Angela Khera
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Danny Liew
- Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Kathryn Burrell
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Amy Wilson-O'Brien
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Annalise Stanley
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
| | | | - Alexander J Thompson
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Parker CH, Henry S, Liu LWC. Efficacy of Biofeedback Therapy in Clinical Practice for the Management of Chronic Constipation and Fecal Incontinence. J Can Assoc Gastroenterol 2019; 2:126-131. [PMID: 31294375 PMCID: PMC6619409 DOI: 10.1093/jcag/gwy036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2018] [Revised: 06/06/2018] [Accepted: 06/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic constipation (CC) and fecal incontinence (FI) are often secondary to pelvic floor neuromuscular sensory or motor dysfunction. Biofeedback therapy (BFT) uses visual and verbal feedback to improve anorectal coordination, strength and sensation. In clinical trials, BFT demonstrated response rates between 70% and 80%. The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of BFT in clinical practice. METHODS In this retrospective observational cohort study, the charts of all patients who completed BFT at our centre were reviewed. A positive response to BFT was defined as improvement in ARM profile from baseline or subjective symptom improvement or both. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. RESULTS One hundred thirty patients with an average age of 57.5 ± 16.4 years and 79.2% female were included. Of all patients, 43.1% were referred for CC, 37.7% for FI, 16.9% for alternating CC and FI, and 2.3% for rectal pain. The overall response rate to BFT was 76.2% (n=99). Of those that responded, 64.6% (n=64) demonstrated both ARM and symptom improvement, 27.3% (n=27) had ARM improvement but no symptom improvement, and 8.1% (n=8) had symptom improvement but no ARM improvement. In patients with FI, the overall response rate was 79.6% (n=39) with symptom improvement in 67.3% (n=33). In those with CC with dyssynergic defecation (n=53), the overall response rate was 69.8% (n=37); however, only 45.3% (n=24) had symptomatic improvement. CONCLUSION In our clinical practice, although overall response rates to BFT are similar to published reports, patients with CC with dyssynergic defecation are less likely to have symptomatic response compared with those with FI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colleen H Parker
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stanley Henry
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Louis W C Liu
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Simillis C, Lal N, Pellino G, Baird D, Nikolaou S, Kontovounisios C, Smith JJ, Tekkis PP. A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing treatments for faecal incontinence. Int J Surg 2019; 66:37-47. [PMID: 31022519 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2019] [Revised: 03/24/2019] [Accepted: 04/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although numerous treatments exist for fecal incontinence (FI), no consensus exists on the best treatment strategy. The aim was to review the literature and to compare the clinical outcomes and effectiveness of treatments available for FI. MATERIALS AND METHOD A systematic literature review was performed, from inception to May 2018, of the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, Cochrane Library. The search terms used were "faecal incontinence" and "treatment". Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing treatments for FI were considered. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed using the Markov chain Monte Carlo method. RESULT Forty-seven RCTs were included comparing 37 treatments and reporting on 3748 participants. No treatment ranked best or worst with high probability for any outcome of interest. No significant difference was identified between treatments for frequency of FI per week, or in changing the resting pressure, maximum resting pressure, squeeze pressure, and maximum squeeze pressure. Radiofrequency resulted in more adverse events compared to placebo. Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) and zinc-aluminium improved the fecal incontinence quality of life questionnaire (FIQL) lifestyle, coping, and embarrassment domains compared to placebo. Transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation (TPTNS) improved the FIQL embarrassment domain compared to placebo. Autologous myoblasts and zinc-aluminium improved the FIQL depression domain compared to placebo. SNS, artificial bowel sphincter (ABS), and zinc-aluminium significantly improved incontinence scores compared to placebo. Injection of non-animal stabilized hyaluronic acid/dextranomer (NASHA/Dx) resulted in more patients with ≥50% reduction in FI episodes compared to placebo. CONCLUSION SNS, ABS, TPTNS, NASHA/Dx, zinc-aluminium, and autologous myoblasts resulted in isolated improvements in specific outcomes of interest. No difference was identified in incontinence episodes, no treatment ranked best persistently or persistently improved outcomes, and many included treatments did not significantly benefit patients compared to placebo. Large multicentre RCTs with long-term follow-up and standardized inclusion criteria and outcome measures are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantinos Simillis
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK.
| | - Nikhil Lal
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Gianluca Pellino
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Daniel Baird
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Stella Nikolaou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Christos Kontovounisios
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Jason J Smith
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Paris P Tekkis
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Murad-Regadas SM, Regadas FSP, Regadas Filho FSP, Mendonça Filho JJD, Andrade Filho RS, Vilarinho ADS. PREDICTORS OF UNSUCCESSFUL OF TREATMENT FOR FECAL INCONTINENCE BIOFEEDBACK FOR FECAL INCONTINENCE IN FEMALE. ARQUIVOS DE GASTROENTEROLOGIA 2019; 56:61-65. [PMID: 31141067 DOI: 10.1590/s0004-2803.201900000-17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2018] [Accepted: 02/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Biofeedback is an effective method of treatment for fecal incontinence but there is controversy regarding factors that may be correlated with its effectiveness. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of biofeedback in the treatment of fecal incontinence, identifying the predictive factors for unsuccessful treatment. METHODS Consecutive female patients who had fecal incontinence and were treated with a full course of biofeedback were screened. The symptoms were evaluated using Cleveland Clinic incontinence (CCF) score before and six months after the completion of therapy. Patients had a satisfactory clinical response to biofeedback if the CCF score had decreased by more than 50% at six months (GI) and an unsatisfactory response if the CCF score did not decrease or if the score decreased by <50% (GII). The groups were compared with regard to age, score, anal resting and squeeze pressures and sustained squeeze pressure by manometry, history of vaginal delivery, number of vaginal deliveries, menopause, hysterectomy, and previous anorectal surgery. RESULTS Of 124 women were included, 70 (56%) in GI and 54 (44%) in GII. The median CCF score decreased significantly from 10 to 5 (P=0.00). FI scores were higher in GII. Patients from GII had more previous vaginal deliveries and previous surgeries. The mean sustained squeeze pressure was higher in GI. Patients from GI and GII had similar ages, number of vaginal deliveries, menopause, hysterectomy, anal pressures, and sphincter defects. The median sustained squeeze pressure increased significantly before and after biofeedback in GI. CONCLUSION Biofeedback therapy shows effective treatment with 50% reductions in FI score in half of patients. Factors associated with unsuccessful outcome include FI score ≥10, previous vaginal delivery, previous anorectal and/or colorectal surgery, and reduced mean sustained squeeze pressure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sthela M Murad-Regadas
- Universidade Federal do Ceará, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Cirurgia, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil.,Universidade Federal do Ceará, Hospital das Clínicas, Unidade de Piso Pélvico e Fisiologia Anorretal, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil.,Hospital São Carlos, Departamento de Cirurgia Colorretal, Unidade de Piso Pélvico e Fisiologia Anorretal, CE, Brasil
| | | | | | | | - Roberto S Andrade Filho
- Hospital São Carlos, Departamento de Cirurgia Colorretal, Unidade de Piso Pélvico e Fisiologia Anorretal, CE, Brasil
| | - Adjra da Silva Vilarinho
- Hospital São Carlos, Departamento de Cirurgia Colorretal, Unidade de Piso Pélvico e Fisiologia Anorretal, CE, Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Chakraborty S, Feuerhak K, Muthyala A, Harmsen WS, Bailey KR, Bharucha AE. Effects of Alfuzosin, an α 1-Adrenergic Antagonist, on Anal Pressures and Bowel Habits in Women With and Without Defecatory Disorders. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 17:1138-1147.e3. [PMID: 30130627 PMCID: PMC6379158 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.08.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2018] [Revised: 08/08/2018] [Accepted: 08/09/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Some patients with defecatory disorders (DD) have high anal pressures that may impede rectal evacuation. Alpha-1 adrenoreceptors mediate as much as 50% of anal resting pressure in humans. We performed a randomized, placebo-controlled study of the effects of alfuzosin, an alpha1-adrenergic receptor antagonist, on anal pressures alone in healthy women and also on bowel symptoms in women with DD. METHODS In a double-blind study performed from March 2013 through March 2017, anal pressures were evaluated before and after 36 women with DD (constipation for at least 1 year) and 36 healthy women (controls) were randomly assigned (1:1) to groups given oral alfuzosin (2.5 mg immediate release) or placebo. Thereafter, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to groups given oral alfuzosin (10 mg extended release) or placebo each day for 2 weeks. Participants kept daily diaries of bowel symptoms for 2 weeks before (baseline) and during administration of the test articles (treatment). Weekly questionnaires recorded the overall severity of constipation symptoms, bloating, abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting; overall satisfaction with treatment of constipation was evaluated at weeks 2 and 4. The primary endpoint was the change in the number of spontaneous (SBMs) and complete SBMs (CSBMs) between the treatment and baseline periods. We evaluated relationships between stool form, passage, and complete evacuation. RESULTS Alfuzosin reduced anal resting pressure by 32 ± 3 mm Hg versus 16 ± 3 mm Hg for placebo (P = .0001) and anal pressure during evacuation by 26 ± 3 mm Hg versus 16 ± 3 mm Hg for placebo, (P = .03). However, alfuzosin did not significantly increase the rectoanal gradient, SBMs or CSBMs compared with placebo. Both formulations of alfuzosin were well tolerated. Hard stools and the ease of passage during defecation accounted for 72% and 76% of the variance in the satisfaction after defecation, respectively, during baseline and treatment periods. CONCLUSIONS In a randomized trial, alfuzosin reduced anal pressure at rest and during simulated evacuation in healthy and constipated women, compared with placebo, but did not improve bowel symptoms in constipated women. This could be because the drug does not improve stool form or dyssynergia, which also contribute to DD. ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT 01834729.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Subhankar Chakraborty
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Kelly Feuerhak
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Anjani Muthyala
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - William S Harmsen
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Kent R Bailey
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Adil E Bharucha
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Biofeedback therapy (BFT) is effective for managing pelvic floor disorders (i.e., defecatory disorders and fecal incontinence). However, even in controlled clinical trials, only approximately 60% of patients with defecatory disorders experienced long-term improvement. The review serves to update practitioners on recent advances and to identify practical obstacles to providing biofeedback therapy. RECENT FINDINGS The efficacy and safety of biofeedback therapy have been evaluated in defecatory disorders, fecal incontinence, and levator ani syndrome. Recent studies looked at outcomes in specific patient sub-populations and predictors of a response to biofeedback therapy. Biofeedback therapy is effective for managing defecatory disorders, fecal incontinence, and levator ani syndrome. Patients who have a lower bowel satisfaction score and use digital maneuvers fare better. Biofeedback therapy is recommended for patients with fecal incontinence who do not respond to conservative management. A subset of patients with levator ani syndrome who have dyssynergic defecation are more likely to respond to biofeedback therapy.
Collapse
|