Statins have been reported to reduce the risk of gallstone disease. However, the impacts of different durations of statin use on gallstone disease have not been clarified. The aim of this study is toperform a systematic review with meta-analysis to update and to elucidate the association between statin use and the risk of gallstone disease and cholecystectomy.

Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched from the inception until August 2022 for relevant articles investigating the difference in the risk of gallstone disease between statin users and non-users (PROSPERO, ID: CRD42020182445). Meta-analyses were conducted using odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to compare the risk of gallstone disease and cholecystectomy between statin user and nonusers.

Eight studies enrolling 590,086 patients were included. Overall, the use of statins was associated with a marginally significant lower risk of gallstone disease than nonusers (OR, 0.91; 95% CI [0.82-1.00]). Further subgroup analysis showed that short-term users, medium-term users, and long-term users were associated with a significantly higher risk (OR, 1.18; 95% CI [1.11-1.25]), comparable risk (OR, 0.93; 95% CI [0.83-1.04]), and significantly lower risk of gallstone diseases (OR, 0.78; 95% CI [0.68-0.90]) respectively, compared to nonusers.

Patients with medium-term or long-term use of statins without discontinuation are at a lower risk of gallstone disease or cholecystectomy.

Over the past two decades, bile acids (BAs) have become established as important signaling molecules that enable fine-tuned inter-tissue communication from the liver, their site of production, over the intestine, where they are modified by the gut microbiota, to virtually any organ, where they exert their pleiotropic physiological effects. The chemical variety of BAs, to a large extent determined by the gut microbiome, also allows for a complex fine-tuning of adaptive responses in our body. This review provides an overview of the mechanisms by which BA receptors coordinate several aspects of physiology and highlights new therapeutic strategies for diseases underlying pathological BA signaling.

Cholesterol gallstone disease is a common clinical condition influenced by genetic factors, increasing age, female gender, and metabolic factors. Although laparoscopic cholecystectomy is currently considered the gold standard in treating patients with symptomatic gallstones, new perspectives regarding medical therapy of cholelithiasis are currently under discussion, also taking into account the pathogenesis of gallstones, the natural history of the disease and the analysis of the overall costs of therapy. A careful selection of patients may lead to successful non-surgical therapy in symptomatic subjects with a functioning gallbladder harboring small radiolucent stones. The classical oral litholysis by ursodeoxycholic acid has been recently paralleled by new experimental observations, suggesting that cholesterol-lowering agents which inhibit cholesterol synthesis (statins) or intestinal cholesterol absorption (ezetimibe), or drugs acting on specific nuclear receptors involved in cholesterol and bile acid homeostasis, might be proposed as additional approaches for treating cholesterol gallstones. In this review we discuss old, recent and future perspectives on medical treatment of cholesterol cholelithiasis.

The aim of this study was to investigate whether the use of statins was associated with a decreased risk of gallstone disease.

We conducted a population-based case-control study in Taiwan. Cases consisted of all patients who were aged 50 years and older and had a first-time diagnosis of gallstone disease or cholecystectomy for the period between 2005 and 2009. The controls were matched to cases by age, sex and index date. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by using multiple logistic regression.

We examined 1014 gallstone disease cases and 1014 controls. The unadjusted ORs for any statin prescription was 1.06 (95% CI 0.86 to 1.29), and the adjusted OR was 1.14 (95% CI 0.90 to 1.43). Compared with no use of statins, the adjusted ORs were 1.05 (95% CI 0.72 to 1.54) for the group having been prescribed statins with cumulative defined daily doses (DDDs) below 41.53, 1.12 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.50) for the group with cumulative dose between 41.54 and 334.81 DDD, and 1.30 (95% CI 0.86 to 1.95) for the group with cumulative statin use of 334.81 DDDs or more.

This study does not provide support for a beneficial association between usage of statin and gallstone disease.

Gallstone disease is a frequent condition throughout the world and, cholesterol stones are the most frequent form in Western countries. The standard treatment of symptomatic gallstone subjects is laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The selection of patients amenable for nonsurgical, medical therapy is of key importance; a careful analysis should consider the natural history of the disease and the overall costs of therapy. Only patients with mild symptoms and small, uncalcified cholesterol gallstones in a functioning gallbladder with a patent cystic duct are considered for oral litholysis by hydrophilic ursodeoxycholic acid, in the hope of achieving cholesterol desaturation of bile and progressive stone dissolution. Recent studies have raised the possibility that cholesterol-lowering agents that inhibit hepatic cholesterol synthesis (statins) or intestinal cholesterol absorption (ezetimibe), or drugs acting on specific nuclear receptors involved in cholesterol and bile acid homeostasis, may offer, alone or in combination, additional medical therapeutic tools for treating cholesterol gallstones. Recent perspectives on medical treatment of cholesterol gallstone disease are discussed in this article.

Published data suggest that the cholesterol-lowering effect of dietary plant sterol esters is less marked in longer-term than in short-term studies, whereas plant stanol esters maintain their efficacy. To investigate this further, healthy subjects and patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) receiving statins were randomized to receive plant sterol ester 1.6 g/day or plant stanol ester 1.6 g/day or 2.6 g/day for 2 months. There was no difference among the 3 groups in the pooled low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-lowering response of FH patients and healthy subjects, but the effect of plant sterol diminished at 2 months and was not significantly different from baseline. This was accompanied by increases in serum plant sterols and a significant decrease in 7alpha-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one, a marker of bile acid synthesis, especially in FH patients not taking bile acid sequestrants. In contrast, plant stanol esters lowered significantly both LDL cholesterol and plant sterols at 2 months and had no effect on bile acid synthesis. Slight decreases in serum lipid-soluble antioxidants occurred with both plant sterol and stanol esters. Our findings suggest that absorption of dietary plant sterols downregulates bile acid synthesis, which attenuates their cholesterol-lowering efficacy. We conclude that plant stanol esters are preferable for the long-term management of hypercholesterolemia.

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is beneficial in cholestatic diseases but its molecular mechanisms of action remain to be clearly elucidated. Other bile acids, such as chenodeoxycholic (CDCA), are agonists for the nuclear farnesoid X receptor (FXR) and regulate the expression of genes relevant for bile acid and cholesterol homeostasis. In ileal cells CDCA, through the FXR, up-regulates the expression of the ileal bile acid-binding protein (IBABP), implicated in the enterohepatic circulation of bile acids. We report that UDCA (100 and 200 microM) induced a moderate increase of IBABP mRNA (approximately 10% of the effect elicited by 50 microM CDCA) in enterocyte-like Caco-2 cells and approximately halved the potent effect of CDCA (50 microM). On the contrary, UDCA reduced by 80-90% CDCA-induced IBABP transcription in hepatocarcinoma derived HepG2 cells. We confirmed that these effects on IBABP transcription required the FXR by employing a cell-based transactivation assay. Finally, in a receptor binding assay, we found that UDCA binds to FXR expressed in CHO-K1 cells (K(d)=37.7 microM). Thus, UDCA may regulate IBABP in Caco-2 cells, which express it constitutively, by acting as a partial agonist through a FXR mediated mechanism. The observation that in HepG2 cells, which do not express constitutively IBABP, UDCA was able to almost completely prevent CDCA-induced activation of IBABP promoter, suggests that tissue-specific factors, other than FXR, may be required for bile acid regulation of FXR target genes.

Ursodeoxycholic acid is an approved therapy for hepatobiliary disorders but in infants and children compliance is compromised because it is formulated exclusively as capsules, or tablets.

To determine the pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of a new liquid formulation of ursodeoxycholic acid (Ursofalk suspension) with a standard capsule (Ursofalk) in a randomized, unblinded, crossover designed study of 24 healthy adults.

Equivalence was based on single bolus oral plasma pharmacokinetics and biliary ursodeoxycholic acid enrichments after repeat doses. Biliary bile acid composition and hydrophobicity index were also compared. Ursodeoxycholic acid was measured in duodenal bile by high-performance liquid chromatography and in plasma by mass spectrometry.

The mean percentage biliary ursodeoxycholic acid enrichment after administration of the suspension was not significantly different from that obtained with capsules (44.2 +/- 11.7% vs. 46.9 +/- 10.2%, respectively). The equivalence ratio was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.8-1.1), establishing bioequivalence between suspension and capsules. Both formulations reduced the biliary hydrophobicity index and no differences in bile acid composition were observed between formulations. The plasma pharmacokinetics of both formulations was similar and the tolerability of the suspension was excellent.

A new liquid formulation of ursodeoxycholic acid suitable for paediatric patients is pharmacologically bioequivalent to capsules when given as single, or repeated oral doses.

To compare the cholesterol-lowering efficacy and other metabolic effects of plant sterol and stanol esters, both of which are commonly used in the dietary management of hypercholesterolaemia.

The cholesterol-lowering efficacy of equivalent intakes of sterol and stanol esters and of different intakes of stanol esters were compared at 1 and 2 months, both in normal subjects and treated patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia. Systemic effects were assessed by measuring serum levels of plant sterols and of lathosterol and 7alpha-hydroxy-cholestenone, indices of sterol absorption and of cholesterol and bile acid synthesis respectively. There were no significant differences during the study between 1.6g daily of sterol and stanol esters in reducing total cholesterol (by 3-7%) or low density lipoprotein cholesterol (by 4-8%), nor between 1.6 and 2.6 g daily of stanol. However, the cholesterol-lowering effect of plant sterol esters was attenuated between 1 and 2 months. This was accompanied by increased serum plant sterols and decreased levels of 7alpha-hydroxy-cholestenone, especially in statin-treated hypercholesterolaemic patients not taking bile acid sequestrants.

These findings suggest that absorption of dietary plant sterols suppressed bile acid synthesis, thereby diminishing their cholesterol-lowering efficacy. In contrast, plant stanols reduced plant sterol absorption and maintained their cholesterol-lowering efficacy.

We studied changes in serum cholestanol and plant sterols (indexes of cholesterol absorption) and cholesterol precursors (indexes of cholesterol synthesis) in response to cholesterol reduction by way of 1 year's treatment with atorvastatin (n = 102) and simvastatin (n = 105) treatments in patients with coronary heart disease. Serum cholesterol levels and ratios of the precursor sterols to cholesterol after 1 year of treatment were reduced in proportion to the pretreatment values (33% +/- 1% by simvastatin and 36% +/- 1% by atorvastatin; P <.01 for difference between groups) for cholesterol; the respective reductions in the precursor sterol:cholesterol ratios were also higher with atorvastatin (50% +/- 2% for lathosterol) than with simvastatin (42% +/- 1%; P <.01 between groups), but the ratio of squalene to cholesterol was increased (17% +/- 5%, P <.001) by atorvastatin. Plant sterol concentrations were gradually increased by atorvastatin but decreased initially by simvastatin. However, their ratios with respect to cholesterol were increased by as much as 82% with atorvastatin and by as much as 39% with simvastatin. In conclusion, effective inhibition of cholesterol synthesis and subsequent reduction in serum cholesterol levels by statins lead to increases in serum plant-sterol levels, probably as a result of reduced biliary secretion and enhanced absorption of these sterols. Because serum plant sterols have been claimed to be involved in the early development of atherosclerosis, the question arises whether continuously increasing serum plant sterols during long-term statin treatment should be prevented by cholesterol malabsorption (eg, by plant stanol ester consumption), especially in subjects with high baseline plant sterol values and effective sterol absorption.

Ratios of cholestanol, campesterol, and sitosterol to cholesterol in serum are known to reflect cholesterol absorption efficiency. Here, a possible link between these ratios and biliary secretion rates of cholesterol was investigated. Biliary lipid secretion rates and serum sterols were determined in 13 patients with gallstones. Seven were treated with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) (1,000 mg/d). Serum cholesterol and non-cholesterol sterols were also measured in a cross over study in 20 healthy volunteers, who received either placebo or UDCA (750 mg/d). Biliary cholesterol secretion was significantly lower, whereas the non-cholesterol sterols and their ratio to cholesterol were higher in patients with gallstones treated with UDCA. A highly significant negative linear correlation between the ratios of non-cholesterol sterols to cholesterol and biliary cholesterol secretion was observed. In volunteers, administration of UDCA for 4 weeks was followed by a significant increase in non-cholesterol sterols and their ratios. Even 4 weeks after discontinuing UDCA administration, campesterol and sitosterol were still significantly higher than pretreatment levels, which was also true for the campesterol-cholesterol ratio after 8 weeks. The results suggest that the ratios of cholestanol, campesterol, and sitosterol to cholesterol can be used as indicators of changes in biliary cholesterol secretion rates.

Ginseng is one of the most popular herbal remedies. Studies were performed in anaesthetized rats to examine the effect of ginseng on bile secretion. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were anaesthetized with intraperitoneal (i.p.) urethane (1.25 g kg(-1)) and equipped with biliary cannulas inserted into the bile duct through the sphincter of Oddi. Rats were treated with a single i.p. injection of ginseng at 25, 50 or 100 mg kg(-1) (1 ml(-1)) 30 min before bile collection; the control group received i.p. saline only at 1 ml(-1)volume. The effect of multiple doses of ginseng on bile volume and biliary composition was also studied. Ginseng was given in the higher dose of 100 mg kg(-1) (1 ml(-1), i.p.) every 12 hours for 2 days. Bile was collected in 15 min fractions for 90 min. Bile flow (bile-pancreatic juice), biliary excretion of total proteins, cholesterol and total lipids were measured. The single administration of different doses (25, 50 and 100 mg kg (-1)) of ginseng reduced basal bile secretion in a dose-dependent manner. Single-dose administration of ginseng at 100 mg kg(-1) caused 32.9% reduction in basal bile flow. Meanwhile, mean basal bile flow was reduced by 15.1% in rats treated with multiple doses of ginseng at 100 mg kg(-1) for two days. Biliary protein concentrations were significantly increased after single- or multiple-dose administration of ginseng, but protein output was only significantly increased (33%) in rats treated with ginseng (100 mg kg(-1)) twice a day for 2 days. Biliary total lipids and cholesterol concentration and outputs were significantly reduced after single or multiple administration of ginseng. In conclusion, administration of ginseng in the rat resulted in a reduction of bile flow and in bile secretion of total lipids and cholesterol, while it increased the secretion of proteins in a dose-dependent manner. The precise mechanisms underlying these effects remain to be elucidated. The findings indicate the need for clinical trials for the effect of this herb on bile composition and flow in man in view of a possible modulatory effect for the herb on gallstone formation.

There is limited information available on the effects of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors on hepatic and biliary cholesterol metabolism in patients with gallstones. The aims of this study were to determine the effect of simvastatin on the regulatory elements of cholesterol metabolism that determine the concentrations of cholesterol in plasma and bile.

Thirty-one gallstone patients were enrolled in the study; 17 were treated with 20 mg simvastatin daily for 3 weeks prior to cholecystectomy and 14 served as controls. Samples of blood, liver, gall-bladder bile and bile from the common bile duct (CBD) were collected and analysed.

The plasma cholesterol (-30%), triacylglycerol (-23%) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (-42%) concentrations were significantly lowered by simvastatin treatment, as was the plasma lathosterol: cholesterol (-70%), which reflects whole-body cholesterol synthesis. Despite these changes, the hepatic LDL receptor protein and LDL receptor activity in circulating mononuclear cells were similar in both groups. There were no differences in the plasma phytosterol: cholesterol, which reflects the intestinal cholesterol absorption capacity or in the activity of hepatic acyl-coenzyme A: cholesterol acyltransferase. There were however, lower cholesterol concentrations in CBD (-68%) and gall bladder (-41%) bile, and decreased lithogenic (-47%) and bile acid hydrophobicity (-22%) indices of CBD bile in the simvastatin group.

These data indicate that simvastatin reduced plasma and biliary cholesterol levels primarily by reducing cholesterol synthesis. The reduction in CBD bile lithogenicity and bile acid hydrophobicity by simvastatin suggests that this agent may be useful for people who have early stages of cholesterol gallstone development and in whom a choleretic effect is required.

This review summarizes the main advances made in the epidemiology, pathogenesis, and medical treatment of gallstone disease in the past year. Whether rapid weight reduction can precipitate gallstone formation is still debated. Phospholipase A(2)-II seems to play an interesting role in the pathogenesis of multiple cholesterol stone formation, and ursodeoxycholic acid may partially halt the formation of multiple cholesterol stones by mediating an anti-inflammatory effect on the gallbladder. Bacterial infections may contribute to gallstone formation, perhaps through secretion of biofilm. The combination of ursodeoxycholic acid and simvastatin for the resolution and prevention of gallstones is promising, but larger studies are needed.