Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Radiol. Nov 28, 2013; 5(11): 398-410
Published online Nov 28, 2013. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v5.i11.398
Published online Nov 28, 2013. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v5.i11.398
Dual- X-ray absorptiometry | Quantitative computed tomography | Quantitative ultrasound | |||
PROS | CONS | PROS | CONS | PROS | CONS |
High accuracy | X-rays | True density values | Higher radiation dose than DXA | Quick, cheap and radiation-free devices | Different guidelines for definition of osteoporosis |
Assessment on reference sites (spine and hip) | High cost | Discriminates completely trabecular from cortical bone | Limited accessibility | Portable systems | Only peripheral anatomical sites |
Several validation studies available in literature | Does not distinguish between cortical and trabecular components | High resolution | Shorter investigation times than DXA | Not directly comparable with the gold standard DXA | |
Does not discriminate bone microarchitecture | Useful to investigate bone structural features and elastic properties of bone tissue | ||||
Not useful as a screening tool | Not useful as a screening tool | Useful as a screening tool |
- Citation: Pisani P, Renna MD, Conversano F, Casciaro E, Muratore M, Quarta E, Paola MD, Casciaro S. Screening and early diagnosis of osteoporosis through X-ray and ultrasound based techniques. World J Radiol 2013; 5(11): 398-410
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v5/i11/398.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v5.i11.398