Basic Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Radiol. Jul 28, 2023; 15(7): 226-233
Published online Jul 28, 2023. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v15.i7.226
Table 1 Brachial artery flow measurements before and after stimulation according to ırritable bowel syndrome and control groups

Pre-stimulation flow rate (mL/min), mean ± SD
Post-stimulation flow rate (mL/min), mean ± SD
P value
IBS (n = 29)60.2 ± 28.878.1 ± 42.50.002
Control (n = 29)77.5 ± 36.539.7 ± 19.1< 0.001
P value0.05< 0.001
Table 2 Brachial artery diameter measurements before and after stimulation according to IBS and control groups

Diameter before stimulus (mm), mean ± SD
Diameter after stimulus (mm), mean ± SD
P value
IBS3.4 ± 0.53.7 ± 0.50.01
Control3.4 ± 0.52.8 ± 0.6< 0.001
P value0.92< 0.001
Table 3 Changes in brachial artery flow and diameter with stimulation

Flow difference before and after stimulus (mL/min), median (25P-75P)
Diameter difference before and after stimulus (mm), median (25P-75P)
IBS9.10 (0.00-33.70)0.20 (0.00-0.40)
Control-33.00 (-42.50 to -24.20)-0.50 (-0.90 to -0.40)
P value< 0.001< 0.001
Table 4 The difference in flow rate between ırritable bowel syndrome and the control group before and after stimulation, according to gender


The difference in flow rate between before and after a stimülation (mL/min), median (25P-75P)
P value
FemaleIBS (n = 15)11.90 (0.00-35.70)< 0.001
Control (n = 15)-25.50 (-39.40 to -21.60)
MaleIBS (n = 14)6.55 (-0.60-25.50)< 0.001
Control (n = 14)-39.75 (-58.90 to -32.00)
Table 5 Diameter difference before and after stimulation between ırritable bowel syndrome and control groups according to sex


The difference in diameter between before and after a stimulation (mm), median (25P-75P)
P value
FemaleIBS (n = 15)0.20 (0.00-0.40)< 0.001
Control (n = 15)-0.50 (-1.00 to -0.30)
MaleIBS (n = 14)0.30 (0.00-0.50)< 0.001
Control (n = 14)-0.60 (-0.90 to -0.40)