Editorial
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Radiol. Dec 28, 2015; 7(12): 421-423
Published online Dec 28, 2015. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v7.i12.421
Future of cardiac computed tomography
Carlo N De Cecco, U Joseph Schoepf
Carlo N De Cecco, U Joseph Schoepf, Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, United States
U Joseph Schoepf, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, United States
Author contributions: Both authors contributed to this manuscript.
Conflict-of-interest statement: Dr. Schoepf is a consultant for and/or receives research support from Bayer, Bracco, GE and Siemens. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Correspondence to: Carlo N De Cecco, MD, PhD, Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, 25 Courtenay Drive, MSC 226, Charleston, SC 29425, United States. dececco@musc.edu
Telephone: +1-843-8763185 Fax: +1-843-8763157
Received: June 8, 2015
Peer-review started: June 10, 2015
First decision: August 4, 2015
Revised: September 17, 2015
Accepted: October 16, 2015
Article in press: October 19, 2015
Published online: December 28, 2015
Processing time: 203 Days and 8.1 Hours
Core Tip

Core tip: Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) represents a mature technique providing accurate, non-invasive morphological assessment of the coronary arteries and atherosclerotic plaque burden. Computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging, including both dynamic and static dual-energy approaches, has demonstrated the ability to directly assess and quantify myocardial ischemia with simultaneous CCTA acquisition. In order to promote CCTA in the clinical and research environments, radiologists should prepare to embrace the change from morphological to functional imaging.

In recent years, coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has transitioned through the experimental and clinical validation stages to become an integral tool in the noninvasive diagnostic workup of patients with suspected coronary artery disease in both elective and emergency settings. Today, it represents a mature technique providing accurate, non-invasive morphological assessment of the coronary arteries and atherosclerotic plaque burden with a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 98% and 89%, respectively[1]. Technical innovations are continuously improving diagnostic performance and decreasing the radiation dose and contrast medium volume necessary for this test. Iterative reconstruction algorithms, low kV imaging, and single-heart beat acquisitions hold promise to further reduce dose requirements and improve the safety and robustness of the technique in several circumstances including imaging of heavily calcified vessels, patients with morbid obesity or irregular heart rates, and assessment in the emergency setting. In parallel with the growth of CCTA, the cardiac radiologist has evolved from the role of a general thoracic radiologist with limited knowledge of cardiac pathophysiology to a specialist with vast expertise in cardiac disease and cutting edge imaging applications.

However, it has become clear over recent years that cardiac radiologists need to take further steps towards the development and integration of functional imaging with morphological CCTA assessment to truly provide a comprehensive evaluation of the heart. In fact, a growing body of evidence has shown that a purely anatomical evaluation of coronary stenosis does not adequately predict hemodynamic relevance and is thus suboptimal for guiding patient management, including the major FAME and COURAGE trials which validated the impact of functional tests in coronary revascularization[2,3]. In response to this limitation, innovative computed tomography (CT) technology has allowed the derivation of functional data in addition to morphological assessment, providing comprehensive appraisal of both the anatomical and functional aspects of coronary heart disease with a single modality.

CT myocardial perfusion imaging, including both dynamic and static dual-energy approaches, has demonstrated the ability to directly assess and quantify myocardial ischemia with simultaneous CCTA acquisition with a reasonable contrast medium volume and radiation dose delivered to the patient as long as the scanner technology is recent enough to meet such high technological requirements[4]. The administration of a pharmacological stressor, including adenosine, regadenoson, dobutamine, or dipyridamole, to induce a hyperemic myocardium, could represent a potential challenge from a radiological point of view. However, as demonstrated in our department, a trained team composed of a radiologist, technologist, and nurse with the support of cardiologists or anesthesiologists can safely handle the administration of these drugs, especially in the case of regadenoson, a selective A2A receptor agonist with limited side effects and convenient administration.

In clinical settings where appropriate CT technology is not available or stress perfusion acquisitions cannot be easily performed, other options are available for the assessment of cardiac function[5]. CT-based fractional flow reserve (FFR) allows the assessment of flow-limiting stenosis directly from CCTA datasets, without the use of stress agents, additional image acquisitions or contrast medium injections. However, CT-based FFR calculations require the use of dedicated third party off-site post-processing software, significantly increasing the cost and reporting time. In-house dedicated software is under development which could drastically increase the clinical availability and utilization of this technique. Other less advanced solutions in the diagnosis of significant coronary stenosis, including the lesion length/minimal luminal diameter or corrected coronary attenuation (CCO) can be directly calculated from the CCTA dataset without the need for any dedicated software and with sufficient efficacy[6].

What role, then, should we expect CCTA to play in the standard clinical cardiovascular workup? As CT technology continues to increase the potential for functional assessment in CCTA, we believe the future of cardiac CT is bright.

The volume of CCTA examinations has increased exponentially over the last decade as the technique grew from a niche method performed in the research environment to a routinely used diagnostic test offered in most diagnostic imaging centers. As old scanners are replaced with more advanced versions, an increasing number of hospitals and private diagnostic centers will offer CCTA and it stands to reason that clinician demand will increase. In addition, the aforementioned technological improvements will bring CT-based functional analysis to clinical practice, echoing the rise of morphological CCTA assessment.

In order to promote CCTA in the clinical and research environments, radiologists should prepare to embrace the change from morphological to functional imaging, furnishing all the necessary resources and information to referring clinicians. We are confident in the continued development of this well-established but rapidly growing field and that any challenges to come will continue to promote the role of comprehensively trained cardiac radiologists aware of their pivotal role in cardiac disease management.