Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Radiol. Dec 28, 2014; 6(12): 890-894
Published online Dec 28, 2014. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v6.i12.890
Published online Dec 28, 2014. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v6.i12.890
Postoperative reactive lymphadenitis: A potential cause of false-positive FDG PET/CT
Yiyan Liu, Nuclear Medicine Service, Department of Radiology, Rutgers University Hospital, Newark, NJ 07103, United States
Author contributions: Liu Y solely contributed this work.
Correspondence to: Yiyan Liu, MD, PhD, Nuclear Medicine Service, Department of Radiology, Rutgers University Hospital, 150 Bergen Street, H141, Newark, NJ 07103, United States. liuyl@njms.rutgers.edu
Telephone: +1-973-9726022 Fax: +1-973-9726954
Received: April 30, 2014
Revised: July 1, 2014
Accepted: October 14, 2014
Published online: December 28, 2014
Processing time: 242 Days and 19.1 Hours
Revised: July 1, 2014
Accepted: October 14, 2014
Published online: December 28, 2014
Processing time: 242 Days and 19.1 Hours
Core Tip
Core tip: On restaging F18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography for oncologic patients, a potential problem we may be aware is postoperative reactive lymphadenitis, which may mimic regional nodal metastases. The size and intensity of FDG uptake of the lymph nodes cannot be reliably used for differentiation of reactive lymphadenitis from regional nodal metastasis. Surgical oncologists and radiologists should be aware of reactive lymphadenitis when FDG avid lymphadenopathy is only seen in the lymphatic draining location from surgical site.