Published online Apr 28, 2017. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v9.i4.155
Peer-review started: September 28, 2016
First decision: November 2, 2016
Revised: December 30, 2016
Accepted: January 16, 2017
Article in press: January 18, 2017
Published online: April 28, 2017
Processing time: 215 Days and 4.3 Hours
Interventional radiology (IR) has become an integral part in the management of traumatic injuries. There is an ever-increasing role of IR in traumatic injuries of solid abdominal organs, pelvic and peripheral arteries to control active bleeding by therapeutic embolization or vascular reconstruction using stent grafts. Traditionally, these endovascular treatments have been offered to hemodynamically stable patients. However, in recent times endovascular approach has become preferable to surgery even in hemodynamically unstable patients with injury of surgically difficult-to-access sites. With shifting trends towards non operative management coupled with availability of the current state-of-the-art equipments, hardware and technical expertise, IR has gained an impeccable role in trauma management. However, due to lack of awareness and widespread acceptance, IR continues to remain an ocean of unexplored potentialities.
Core tip: Over the past two decades, there has been a paradigm shift in the management of traumatic injuries with inception of the concept of non operative management (NOM), which is followed if there are no peritoneal signs or hollow viscus injury. Interventional radiology (IR) is an extension of NOM which not only saves lives by achieving hemostasis at the site of vascular injury or difficult to access surgical sites but also controls rebleeding following surgery. Time and again it has proven to be a highly effective management option which successfully bridges the conservative management and emergency laparotomy. In current scenario, in vascular injury, IR can obviate emergency laparotomy not only in hemodynamically stable but unstable patients as well, as evidenced by the recent literature. Ignorance and lack of acceptance have limited the utilization of IR significantly, which if practiced judiciously will provide expedient hemodynamic control as well as faster restoration to physiological status.