Published online Jun 28, 2016. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i6.610
Peer-review started: November 19, 2015
First decision: February 2, 2016
Revised: February 27, 2016
Accepted: April 21, 2016
Article in press: April 22, 2016
Published online: June 28, 2016
Processing time: 213 Days and 19.3 Hours
AIM: To determine whether contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can improve the precision of breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) categorization.
METHODS: A total of 230 patients with 235 solid breast lesions classified as BI-RADS 4 on conventional ultrasound were evaluated. CEUS was performed within one week before core needle biopsy or surgical resection and a revised BI-RADS classification was assigned based on 10 CEUS imaging characteristics. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was then conducted to evaluate the diagnostic performance of CEUS-based BI-RADS assignment with pathological examination as reference criteria.
RESULTS: The CEUS-based BI-RADS evaluation classified 116/235 (49.36%) lesions into category 3, 20 (8.51%), 13 (5.53%) and 12 (5.11%) lesions into categories 4A, 4B and 4C, respectively, and 74 (31.49%) into category 5. Selecting CEUS-based BI-RADS category 4A as an appropriate cut-off gave sensitivity and specificity values of 85.4% and 87.8%, respectively, for the diagnosis of malignant disease. The cancer-to-biopsy yield was 73.11% with CEUS-based BI-RADS 4A selected as the biopsy threshold compared with 40.85% otherwise, while the biopsy rate was only 42.13% compared with 100% otherwise. Overall, only 4.68% of invasive cancers were misdiagnosed.
CONCLUSION: This pilot study suggests that evaluation of BI-RADS 4 breast lesions with CEUS results in reduced biopsy rates and increased cancer-to-biopsy yields.
Core tip: Many published studies show that overdiagnosis is now a problem faced if the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) category is used in clinical practice. Many patients underwent unnecessary biopsies even if the final pathological results were benign lesions. It seems that BI-RADS is not good enough and one of the reasons may be that there is no microvascular information. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can give us this information. We tried to determine whether CEUS can improve the precision of the BI-RADS categorization. Our results showed that in all BI-RADS 4 lesions which were suggested as needing a biopsy, CEUS-based BI-RADS can decrease false positive biopsies and increase cancer-to-biopsy yield and that only 4.68% invasive cancers were misdiagnosed.