Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Radiol. Dec 28, 2013; 5(12): 460-467
Published online Dec 28, 2013. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v5.i12.460
Fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in absence of CT abnormality on PET-CT: What is it?
Yiyan Liu
Yiyan Liu, Nuclear Medicine Service, Department of Radiology, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ 07103, United States
Author contributions: Liu Y solely contributed to this paper.
Correspondence to: Yiyan Liu, MD, PhD, Nuclear Medicine Service, Department of Radiology, University Hospital, H-141, 150 Bergen Street, Newark, NJ 07103, United States. liuyl@njms.rutgers.edu
Telephone: +1-973-9726022 Fax: +1-973-9726954
Received: September 17, 2013
Revised: October 29, 2013
Accepted: November 18, 2013
Published online: December 28, 2013
Processing time: 112 Days and 9.5 Hours
Abstract

The purpose of this article is to provide a pictorial review of the findings and interpretative pitfalls about focal fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in the absence of corresponding computer tomography (CT) lesion or abnormality on an integrated positron emission tomography (PET)-CT. The integrated CT images in the PET-CT scanner allow correct co-registration and fused imaging of anatomical and functional data. On FDG PET-CT imaging, a real pathologic process often demonstrates abnormal uptake associated with a visible corresponding CT lesion or abnormality. When focal uptake is seen on PET imaging but no corresponding anatomic abnormality is visualized on the integrated CT, one should always be aware of possible mis-registration or mismatch of the PET and CT images due to the patient’s respiratory or body motion. While most of the hot spots in the absence of corresponding anatomic abnormalities are artefactual or secondary to benign etiologies, some may represent small sized or early staged neoplasm or metastases, especially in the gastrointestinal tract and skeletons. Caution should be exercised to simply diagnose a pathology based on the presence of the uptake only, or exclude the disease based on the absence of anatomic abnormality.

Keywords: Fluorodeoxyglucose uptake; Positron emission tomography-computer tomography; ARTEF actual uptake; Mis-registration; Positron emission tomography interpretation

Core tip: Abnormal focal uptake without corresponding anatomic abnormality on the integrated computer tomography (CT) imaging poses a dilemma in interpretation of whole-body fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET)-CT imaging. Most of the PET hot spots with the absence of CT lesions or abnormalities are artefactual or secondary to benign etiologies, but some may represent early staged or small sized neoplasm or metastases especially in the gastrointestinal tract and skeletons. Caution should be exercised to simply diagnose a pathology based on the presence of the uptake only, or exclude the disease based on the absence of anatomic abnormality.