Brief Article
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Radiol. Mar 28, 2012; 4(3): 109-114
Published online Mar 28, 2012. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v4.i3.109
Ablation margin assessment of liver tumors with intravenous contrast-enhanced C-arm computed tomography
Jin Iwazawa, Shoichi Ohue, Naoko Hashimoto, Takashi Mitani
Jin Iwazawa, Naoko Hashimoto, Takashi Mitani, Department of Radiology, Nissay Hospital, 6-3-8 Itachibori, Nishiku, Osaka 550-0012, Japan
Shoichi Ohue, Department of Radiology, Komatsu Hospital, 11-6 Kawakatsucho, Neyagawa 572-8567, Japan
Author contributions: Iwazawa J and Ohue S performed the radiofrequency ablations; Hashimoto N, Iwazawa J and Ohue S collected and analyzed the data; Mitani T participated in the design and coordination of the study.
Correspondence to: Jin Iwazawa, MD, Department of Radiology, Nissay Hospital, 6-3-8 Itachibori, Nishiku, Osaka 550-0012, Japan. iwazawa.jin@nissay-hp.or.jp
Telephone: +81-6-65433581 Fax: +81-6-65326482
Received: August 27, 2011
Revised: December 8, 2011
Accepted: December 15, 2011
Published online: March 28, 2012
Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the feasibility of intravenous contrast-enhanced C-arm computed tomography (CT) for assessing ablative areas and margins of liver tumors.

METHODS: Twelve patients (5 men, 7 women; mean age, 69.5 years) who had liver tumors (8 hepatocellular carcinomas, 4 metastatic liver tumors; mean size, 16.3 mm; size range, 8-20 mm) and who underwent percutaneous radiofrequency ablations (RFAs) with a flat-detector C-arm system were retrospectively reviewed. Intravenously enhanced C-arm CT and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) images were obtained at the end of the RFA sessions and 3-7 d after RFA to evaluate the ablative areas and margins. The ablated areas and margins were measured using axial plane images acquired by both imaging techniques, with prior contrast-enhanced MDCT images as the reference. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of C-arm CT for detecting insufficient ablative margins (< 5 mm) were calculated. Statistical differences in the ablative areas and margins evaluated with both imaging techniques were compared using a paired t-test.

RESULTS: All RFA procedures were technically successful. Of 48 total ablative margins, 19 (39.6%) and 20 (41.6%) margins were found to be insufficient with C-arm CT and MDCT, respectively. Moreover, there were no significant differences between these 2 imaging techniques in the detection of these insufficient ablative margins. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for detecting insufficient margins by C-arm CT were 90.0%, 96.4%, 94.7% and 93.1%, respectively. The mean estimated ablative areas calculated from C-arm CT (462.5 ± 202.1 mm2) and from MDCT (441.2 ± 212.5 mm2) were not significantly different. The mean ablative margins evaluated by C-arm CT (6.4 ± 2.2 mm) and by MDCT (6.0 ± 2.4 mm) were also not significantly different.

CONCLUSION: The efficacy of intravenous contrast-enhanced C-arm CT in assessing the ablative areas and margins after RFA of liver tumors is nearly equivalent to that of MDCT.

Keywords: Radiofrequency ablation; Cone-beam computed tomography; Safety margin; Liver; Neoplasms