Published online Jan 28, 2025. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i1.99207
Revised: December 8, 2024
Accepted: December 25, 2024
Published online: January 28, 2025
Processing time: 188 Days and 10.7 Hours
Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (wbMRI) allows general assessment of systemic cancers including lymphomas without radiation burden.
To evaluate the diagnostic performance of wbMRI in the staging of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), determine the value of individual MRI sequences, and assess patients’ concerns with wbMRI.
In this single-center prospective study, adult patients newly diagnosed with systemic DLBCL underwent wbMRI on a 3T scanner [diffusion weighted images with background suppression (DWIBS), T2, short tau inversion recovery (STIR), contrast-enhanced T1] and fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomo
Of 60 eligible patients, 14 (23%) were enrolled and completed the study. The sensitivity of wbMRI in the nodal involvement (182 nodal sites) was 0.84, with 0.99 specificity, positive predictive value of 0.96, negative predictive value of 0.97, and 0.97 accuracy. PET/CT and wbMRI were concordant both in extranodal involvement (13 instances) and staging (κ = 1.0). The mean scores of the utility of MRI sequences were 3.71 ± 0.73 for DWIBS, 2.64 ± 0.84 for T1, 2.14 ± 0.77 for STIR, and 1.29 ± 0.73 for T2 (P < 0.0001). Patients were mostly concerned about the enclosed environment and duration of the MRI examination (27% of patients).
The wbMRI exhibited excellent sensitivity and specificity in staging DLBCL. DWIBS and contrast-enhanced T1 were rated as the most useful sequences. Patients were less willing to undergo wbMRI as a second examination parallel to PET/CT, especially owing to the long duration and the enclosed environment.
Core Tip: Although the agreement in nodal and extranodal involvement by diffuse large-cell B lymphoma is excellent, patients are less willing to undergo whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (wbMRI) as a second examination parallel to positron emission tomography/computed tomography. wbMRI is less well accepted, and patients are concerned about the enclosed environment and duration of the MRI examination. The measurements of lymph node dimensions and quantification of restricted diffusion are not better guides of nodal involvement than visual assessment by an experienced radiologist. Diffusion weighted images with background suppression and contrast-enhanced T1 were the most useful sequences in wbMRI, allowing the imaging protocol to be shortened.