Published online Dec 28, 2024. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v16.i12.712
Revised: November 29, 2024
Accepted: December 16, 2024
Published online: December 28, 2024
Processing time: 104 Days and 6.6 Hours
In this editorial, a commentary on the article by Sudoł-Szopińska et al has been provided. Successful treatment of anal fistula (AF) relies on accurate diagnosis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endoanal ultrasound (EUS) are important for the AF diagnosis. Previously, colorectal surgeons found that AF reports in MRI and EUS issued by radiologists were not appropriate for decision-making and management. To address this issue, a new AF reporting template in MRI and EUS has been developed. The new reporting template has several strengths: (1) It was based on the Delphi study of consensus statements, generated by numerous experts, including 69 colorectal surgeons from different countries, disciplines, and centers; and (2) Fourteen evidence-based statements were discussed repeatedly for 12 months and anonymously voted on in 3 rounds, achieving a consensus on 12 of 14 statements (85.7%). The reporting template comprises six features, each detailing several items related to AF classification and management, with illu
Core Tip: Anal fistula (AF) reports in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endoanal ultrasound (EUS) issued by radiologists are important for successful treatment. Previously, surgeons found that AF reports were not appropriate for surgical decision-making, prompting the proposal of a new template for AF reporting in MRI and EUS. This new reporting template was based on an updated evidence-based consensus statements by multidisciplinary and multicenter experts, closely related to AF classification and management. The use of the new reporting template would be helpful for radiologists to report in a standardized manner and would be appropriate for surgeons for surgical decision-making and management.