Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Radiol. Jan 28, 2020; 12(1): 1-9
Published online Jan 28, 2020. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v12.i1.1
Segmentation of carotid arterial walls using neural networks
Daniel D Samber, Sarayu Ramachandran, Anoop Sahota, Sonum Naidu, Alison Pruzan, Zahi A Fayad, Venkatesh Mani
Daniel D Samber, Sarayu Ramachandran, Anoop Sahota, Sonum Naidu, Alison Pruzan, Zahi A Fayad, Venkatesh Mani, Translational and Molecular Imaging Institute (TMII), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, United States
Author contributions: Samber DD programmed the analysis software and wrote the draft of the manuscript; Ramachandran S assembled and pre-processed imaging data; Naidu S, Sahota A, and Pruzan A performed the image analysis; Fayad ZA and Mani V oversaw the analysis; all authors critically reviewed the manuscript.
Supported by American Heart Association Grant in Aid Founders Affiliate No. 17GRNT33420119 (Mani V), NIH NHLBI 2R01HL070121 (Fayad ZA) and NIH NHLBI 1R01HL135878 (Fayad ZA).
Institutional review board statement: The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.
Informed consent statement: Waiver of institutional review board (IRB) approval was obtained from the IRB as only deidentified data was used in this study. The images analyzed for this study were anonymized and devoid of any Protected Health Information.
Conflict-of-interest statement: No conflicts to disclose.
Data sharing statement: Once published and after appropriate safeguard to ensure that the data is devoid of any identifiers, the data used for the analysis for this study will be shared on the Mount Sinai data sharing portal according to Institutional guidelines.
STROBE statement: The authors have read the STROBE Statement-checklist of items, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the STROBE Statement-checklist of items.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Daniel D Samber, BSc, Research Scientist, Translational Molecular Imaging Institute (TMII), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1470 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10029, United States. daniel.samber@mssm.edu
Received: July 19, 2019
Peer-review started: July 21, 2019
First decision: September 21, 2019
Revised: October 11, 2019
Accepted: November 20, 2019
Article in press: November 20, 2019
Published online: January 28, 2020
Processing time: 152 Days and 20.7 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND

Automated, accurate, objective, and quantitative medical image segmentation has remained a challenging goal in computer science since its inception. This study applies the technique of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to the task of segmenting carotid arteries to aid in the assessment of pathology.

AIM

To investigate CNN’s utility as an ancillary tool for researchers who require accurate segmentation of carotid vessels.

METHODS

An expert reader delineated vessel wall boundaries on 4422 axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance images of bilateral carotid arteries from 189 subjects with clinically evident atherosclerotic disease. A portion of this dataset was used to train two CNNs (one to segment the vessel lumen and the other to segment the vessel wall) with the remaining portion used to test the algorithm’s efficacy by comparing CNN segmented images with those of an expert reader.

RESULTS

Overall quantitative assessment between automated and manual segmentations was determined by computing the DICE coefficient for each pair of segmented images in the test dataset for each CNN applied. The average DICE coefficient for the test dataset (CNN segmentations compared to expert’s segmentations) was 0.96 for the lumen and 0.87 for the vessel wall. Pearson correlation values and the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) were computed for the lumen (Pearson = 0.98, ICC = 0.98) and vessel wall (Pearson = 0.88, ICC = 0.86) segmentations. Bland-Altman plots of area measurements for the CNN and expert readers indicate good agreement with a mean bias of 1%-8%.

CONCLUSION

Although the technique produces reasonable results that are on par with expert human assessments, our application requires human supervision and monitoring to ensure consistent results. We intend to deploy this algorithm as part of a software platform to lessen researchers’ workload to more quickly obtain reliable results.

Keywords: Carotid arteries; Segmentation; Convolutional neural network; Magnetic resonance imaging; Vessel wall

Core tip: Accurate segmentation of carotid arteries is useful in assessing the degree of heart disease in general and vascular diseases (such as atherosclerosis) in particular. Until recently, obtaining accurate segmentation could only be accomplished through the work of an experienced researcher requiring a large investment of time and effort. Over the last several years, the method of convolutional neural networks has demonstrated its efficacy in a number of fields. In this study, we apply this method to magnetic resonance images acquired from subjects with clinically evident atherosclerotic disease and compare the resulting segmentations with those determined by experienced researchers.