1
|
Dogru GD, Tugcu AO, Dursun CU. Enhancing diagnostic frameworks in pancreatic cancer imaging: A critical appraisal. World J Radiol 2025; 17:104818. [DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i3.104818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2025] [Revised: 03/04/2025] [Accepted: 03/20/2025] [Indexed: 03/27/2025] Open
Abstract
This letter to the editor critically appraises the study by Luo et al. While the study provides valuable insights into imaging-pathology correlations in pancreatic cancer, we identify several opportunities for enhancing its clinical relevance. Notably, the exclusion of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging limits the study’s diagnostic scope, as these modalities offer superior capabilities in differentiating benign from malignant lesions and assessing metabolic tumor activity. Additionally, the retrospective, cross-sectional design restricts the potential for dynamic insights into disease progression. We also highlight the untapped potential of radiomics-based analyses, which could significantly improve diagnostic accuracy and prognostic assessments. We recommend integrating these advanced imaging modalities, adopting longitudinal study designs, and leveraging radiomics approaches in future research to enhance the diagnostic frameworks in pancreatic cancer imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Galip Dogukan Dogru
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara 06010, Türkiye
| | - Ahmet Oguz Tugcu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara 06010, Türkiye
| | - Cemal Ugur Dursun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital, İstanbul 34865, Türkiye
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rana SS, Ancil S. Management of Pancreatic Duct Strictures, Leaks, and Disconnected Pancreatic Duct Syndrome. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2025; 54:75-95. [PMID: 39880534 DOI: 10.1016/j.gtc.2024.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2025]
Abstract
Pancreatic duct (PD) strictures, leaks, and disconnected ducts are important morphologic consequences of inflammatory disease of the pancreas, resulting in abdominal pain, pancreatic ascites, pancreatic pleural effusion, and external pancreatic fistula. Traditionally, these PD complications were treated surgically, but a better understanding of their pathophysiology, along with advancement in endoscopic interventions, has transformed the therapy from morbid surgical interventions to minimally invasive, safe, and effective endoscopic treatment. This review discusses the current diagnostic and management strategies for PD strictures, leaks, and disconnected pancreatic ducts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Surinder Singh Rana
- Unit III, Department of Gastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Sector 12, Chandigarh 160012, India.
| | - Sanish Ancil
- Department of Gastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Sector 12, Chandigarh 160012, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kikuyama M, Nakahodo J, Chiba K, Honda G. Focal pancreatic parenchymal atrophy could be a precursor of pancreatic cancer. Pancreatology 2025; 25:241-249. [PMID: 39894733 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2025.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2024] [Revised: 12/10/2024] [Accepted: 01/09/2025] [Indexed: 02/04/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES We previously reported that focal pancreatic parenchymal atrophy (FPPA) indicates high-grade pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HG-PanIN) or carcinoma in situ (CIS). Because HG-PanIN progresses into pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the relationship between FPPA and PDAC should be investigated. METHODS We included 54 patients with PDAC, whose previous computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging were reviewed. The existence, positional relationship between FPPA and PDAC, and time between FPPA recognition and PDAC diagnosis were all examined. Of the 54 patients, 28 underwent surgery. The remaining 26 patients were histopathologically diagnosed with PDAC using endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration. RESULTS Among the 54 patients included, 49 (83.3 %) had FPPA. The pancreatic head and body were the common sites of FPPA. In all patients with FPPA, PDAC developed near the FPPA, with an average distance of 7.93 mm between the edge of the FPPA and the center of the PDAC. The interval between FPPA recognition and PDAC diagnosis was 35.33 months, which was significantly shorter in the surgical group. CONCLUSIONS FPPA could be a precursor of PDAC and suggest the area at risk of PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masataka Kikuyama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Jun Nakahodo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuro Chiba
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Goro Honda
- Department of Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kikuyama M. A Novel Diagnostic Imaging Method for the Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:2080. [PMID: 37370975 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13122080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Revised: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has an extremely poor prognosis, with a survival rate of less than 10% [...].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masataka Kikuyama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1 Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8666, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kikuyama M, Nakahodo J, Honda G, Suzuki M, Horiguchi SI, Chiba K, Tabata H, Ome Y, Uemura SI, Kawamoto Y, Kamisawa T. Pancreatic duct epithelial malignancy suggested by large focal pancreatic parenchymal atrophy in cystic diseases of the pancreas. Pancreatology 2023:S1424-3903(23)00066-2. [PMID: 37003856 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2023.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/12/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND /Objectives: A cystic lesion is common in the pancreas. Focal pancreatic parenchymal atrophy (FPPA) has been reported as a sign of high-grade pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia/carcinoma in situ (HGP/CIS). Some cystic lesions accompany FPPA. However, the relationship between a cystic lesion, FPPA, and the histopathological background of the pancreatic duct is unknown. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated the data of 98 patients with a cystic lesion who underwent serial pancreatic juice aspiration cytologic examination (SPACE) because of accompanying FPPA, increased size of the cystic lesion, and pancreatic duct stricture at the base. RESULTS The clinical diagnosis of a cystic lesion was intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia (IPMN) and cysts in 72 (73.5%) and 26 (26.5%) patients, respectively. Ninety of the 98 patients (91.8%) had FPPA. Positive results (adenocarcinoma and suspicion) on SPACE were observed in 56 of all cases (57.1%), 48 of IPMN (66.7%), 8 of cysts (30.8%), and 54 of FPPA (59.3%), and were significantly associated with IPMN (p = 0.002) and the large FPPA (>269.79 mm2,p = 0.0001); moreover, these disorders are considerably related (p = 0.0003). Fifty patients (51.0%) with positive results on SPACE underwent surgery, with the histopathological diagnosis of epithelial malignancy in 42 patients (42.9%, 42/50, 84%). Many cystic lesions clinically diagnosed as IPMN were dilated branches covered by pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia. CONCLUSIONS Positive results on SPACE were significantly associated with the clinical diagnosis of IPMN and the large FPPA. Moreover, these disorders are significantly related. Surgery owing to positive results could lead to the histopathological diagnosis of HGP/CIS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masataka Kikuyama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Jun Nakahodo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Goro Honda
- Department of Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mizuka Suzuki
- Department of Radiology, Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Kazuro Chiba
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroki Tabata
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yusuke Ome
- Department of Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Yusuke Kawamoto
- Department of Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Terumi Kamisawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Huang C, Simeone DM, Luk L, Hecht EM, Khatri G, Kambadakone A, Chandarana H, Ream JM, Everett JN, Guimaraes A, Liau J, Dasyam AK, Harmath C, Megibow AJ. Standardization of MRI Screening and Reporting in Individuals With Elevated Risk of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Consensus Statement of the PRECEDE Consortium. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2022; 219:903-914. [PMID: 35856454 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.22.27859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most aggressive malignancies, with a dismal survival rate. Screening the general population for early detection of PDAC is not recommended, but because early detection improves survival, high-risk individuals, defined as those meeting criteria based on a family history of PDAC and/or the presence of known pathogenic germline variant genes with PDAC risk, are recommended to undergo screening with MRI and/or endoscopic ultrasound at regular intervals. The Pancreatic Cancer Early Detection (PRECEDE) Consortium was formed in 2018 and is composed of gastroenterologists, geneticists, pancreatic surgeons, radiologists, statisticians, and researchers from 40 sites in North America, Europe, and Asia. The overarching goal of the PRECEDE Consortium is to facilitate earlier diagnosis of PDAC for high-risk individuals to increase survival of the disease. A standardized MRI protocol and reporting template are needed to enhance the quality of screening examinations, improve consistency of clinical management, and facilitate multiinstitutional research. We present a consensus statement to standardize MRI screening and reporting for individuals with elevated risk of pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Gaurav Khatri
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Joy Liau
- University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Anil K Dasyam
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
A rare case of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with ossification mimicking a pancreatic stone impaction. Endosc Ultrasound 2022; 12:290-291. [PMID: 36204801 DOI: 10.4103/eus-d-22-00008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/07/2023] Open
|
8
|
Jearth V, Giri S, Sundaram S. Approach to management of pancreatic strictures: the gastroenterologist's perspective. Clin J Gastroenterol 2021; 14:1587-1597. [PMID: 34405382 DOI: 10.1007/s12328-021-01503-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 08/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Pancreatic strictures represent a complex clinical problem which often requires multidisciplinary management with a team of gastroenterologists, surgeons and radiologists. Dominant strictures are largely due to inflammatory processes of the pancreas like chronic pancreatitis. However, differentiating benign from malignant processes of the pancreas, leading to strictures is imperative and remains a challenge. With advances in endoscopic management, options for therapy include endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), and endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic drainage (EUS-PD) in situations where ERCP is not feasible or fails. However, endoscopic therapy is suited for a select group of patients and surgery remains key to management in many patients. In this narrative review, we look at the gastroenterologist's perspective and approach to pancreatic ductal strictures, including endoscopic and surgical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vaneet Jearth
- Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Suprabhat Giri
- Department of Gastroenterology, Seth GS Medical College and King Edward Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Sridhar Sundaram
- Department of Digestive Diseases and Clinical Nutrition, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Dr. E Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, India.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hasan T, Jha P, Thippeswamy S. Recurrent Pancreatic Pseudocysts Due to Alcohol-Related Chronic Pancreatitis With Double-Duct Sign and Spontaneous Rupture. Cureus 2021; 13:e16039. [PMID: 34345538 PMCID: PMC8321735 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.16039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
A 36-year-old female presented with recurrent attacks of alcohol-related acute on chronic pancreatitis complicated by a pancreatic pseudocyst in the head of the pancreas. The cyst was causing obstruction of the common bile duct (CBD) and pancreatic duct (PD) on magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). She underwent endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided aspiration of the cyst to dryness. A few months later, she presented with epigastric pain and jaundice. MRI pancreas and MRCP revealed a pancreatic cyst in the head of the pancreas, which had grown in size, compressing the CBD and PD with extra and intrahepatic biliary dilatation. There was a recurrence of a new lobulated peripancreatic pseudocyst, which had ruptured resulting in a large collection compressing the right renal capsule. Percutaneous drainage of the ruptured pseudocyst was performed, followed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) that revealed distal CBD stricture, which was stented. Her symptoms improved and she was discharged with no further recurrences of obstructive jaundice during the one-year follow-up period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanveer Hasan
- Internal Medicine, East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Ashford, GBR
| | - Pranav Jha
- Internal Medicine, East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Ashford, GBR
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mann R, Boregowda U, Vyas N, Gajendran M, Umapathy CP, Sayana H, Echavarria J, Patel S, Saligram S. Current advances in the management of chronic pancreatitis. Dis Mon 2021; 67:101225. [PMID: 34176572 DOI: 10.1016/j.disamonth.2021.101225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Chronic pancreatitis is characterized by irreversible destruction of pancreatic parenchyma and its ductal system resulting from longstanding inflammation, leading to fibrosis and scarring due to genetic, environmental, and other risk factors. The diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis is made based on a combination of clinical features and characteristic findings on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Abdominal pain is the most common symptom of chronic pancreatitis. The main aim of treatment is to relieve symptoms, prevent disease progression, and manage complications related to chronic pancreatitis. Patients who do not respond to medical treatment or not a candidate for surgical treatment are usually managed with endoscopic therapies. Endoscopic therapies help with symptoms such as abdominal pain and jaundice by decompression of pancreatic and biliary ducts. This review summarizes the risk factors, pathophysiology, diagnostic evaluation, endoscopic treatment of chronic pancreatitis, and complications. We have also reviewed recent advances in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound-guided therapies for pancreatic duct obstruction due to stones, strictures, pancreatic divisum, and biliary strictures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rupinder Mann
- Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Agnes Medical Center, 1303 E Herndon Ave, Fresno, CA 93720, USA
| | - Umesha Boregowda
- Department of Internal Medicine, Bassett Healthcare Network, Columbia Bassett Medical School, 1 Atwell Road, Cooperstown, NY 13326, USA
| | - Neil Vyas
- Department of Gastroenterology and Advanced endoscopy, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA
| | - Mahesh Gajendran
- Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Science Center El Paso, 2000B Transmountain Road, El Paso, TX 79911, USA
| | - Chandra Prakash Umapathy
- Department of Gastroenterology and Advanced endoscopy, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA
| | - Hari Sayana
- Department of Gastroenterology and Advanced endoscopy, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA
| | - Juan Echavarria
- Department of Gastroenterology and Advanced endoscopy, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA
| | - Sandeep Patel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Advanced endoscopy, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA
| | - Shreyas Saligram
- Department of Gastroenterology and Advanced endoscopy, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
McGhan A, Burbridge R. Therapeutic Endoscopy in the Management of Pancreatic Cancer. PANCREATIC CANCER 2018:799-813. [DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7193-0_87] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2025]
|
12
|
Agrawal S, Vohra S. Simultaneous Courvoisier’s and double duct signs. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 9:425-427. [PMID: 28874964 PMCID: PMC5565509 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v9.i8.425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2016] [Revised: 03/30/2017] [Accepted: 04/24/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Presence of Courvoisier’s or double duct signs in a jaundiced patient is suggestive of malignant obstruction of the pancreaticobiliary ductal system. The oncologic impact of the simultaneous occurrence of these signs on the survival of patients with periampullary cancer is unknown. We report a case of obstructive jaundice secondary to an ampullary cancer demonstrating the Courvoisier’s sign on clinical examination and a double duct sign on imaging. The patient underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy which confirmed an ampullary adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
|
13
|
The diagnostic challenge of the sequelae of acute pancreatitis on CT imaging: a pictorial essay. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2017; 42:1199-1209. [PMID: 27873041 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-016-0986-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of the study was to present a pictorial review of the long-term sequelae of acute pancreatitis on CT imaging as these findings can cause diagnostic confusion in the absence of a proper clinical history and/or prior CT imaging. METHODS We retrospectively identified 81 patients who had an episode of acute pancreatitis with diagnostic findings on CT and also underwent one or more follow-up CT scans at least 1 month beyond the acute episode. The residual findings on all follow-up CT scans were tabulated, including the time interval since the initial bout of acute pancreatitis. RESULT Residual inflammatory changes were present in 19.8% of cases, with a median time period lasting 86 days since the initial episode of acute pancreatitis. Residual fluid collections were seen in 27.2% and persisted for a median of 132 days. Three patients had residual solid-appearing inflammatory masses, which could be mistaken for neoplasms. Other long-term sequelae were also tabulated, including pancreatic ductal dilatation, pancreatic atrophy, new or increased pancreatic calcifications, biliary tract dilatation, central portal venous occlusion, and pseudoaneurysm formation. These residual findings and long-term complications are presented as a pictorial essay. CONCLUSION Recognizing the spectrum of residual findings of acute pancreatitis, some of which can be long term, is important in the correct interpretation of a pancreatic CT. These findings can mimic acute pancreatitis or a pancreatic/peripancreatic neoplasm and often cause diagnostic confusion, especially in the absence of prior CT imaging.
Collapse
|
14
|
Schawkat K, Kühn W, Inderbitzin D, Gloor B, Heverhagen JT, Runge VM, Christe A. Diagnostic Value and Interreader Agreement of the Pancreaticolienal Gap in Pancreatic Cancer on MDCT. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0166003. [PMID: 27893776 PMCID: PMC5125578 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2016] [Accepted: 10/21/2016] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the diagnostic value and measure interreader agreement of the pancreaticolienal gap (PLG) in the assessment of imaging features of pancreatic carcinoma (PC) on contrast-enhanced multi-detector computed tomography (CE-MDCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS CE-MDCT studies in the portal venous phase were retrospectively reviewed for 66 patients with PC. The age- and gender-matched control group comprised 103 healthy individuals. Three radiologists with different levels of experience independently measured the PLG (the minimum distance of the pancreatic tail to the nearest border of the spleen) in the axial plane. The interreader agreement of the PLG and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to calculate the accuracy of the technique. RESULTS While the control group (n = 103) showed a median PLG of 3 mm (Range: 0 - 39mm) the PC patients had a significantly larger PLG of 15mm (Range: 0 - 53mm)(p < 0.0001). A ROC curve demonstrated a cutoff-value of >12 mm for PC, with a sensitivity of 58.2% (95% CI = 45.5-70.1), specificity of 84.0% (95% CI = 75.6-90.4) and an area under the ROC curve of 0.714 (95% CI = 0.641 to 0.780). The mean interreader agreement showed correlation coefficient r of 0.9159. The extent of the PLG did not correlate with tumor stage but did correlate with pancreatic density (fatty involution) and age, the density decreased by 4.1 HU and the PLG increased by 0.8 mm within every 10 y. CONCLUSION The significant interreader agreement supports the use of the PLG as a characterizing feature of pancreatic cancer independent of the tumor stage on an axial plane. The increase in the PLG with age may represent physiological atrophy of the pancreatic tail.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khoschy Schawkat
- Department of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Wolfgang Kühn
- Department of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Inderbitzin
- Department of Visceral and Transplantion Surgery, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Surgery, Tiefenau Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Beat Gloor
- Department of Visceral and Transplantion Surgery, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Johannes T. Heverhagen
- Department of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Val Murray Runge
- Department of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Andreas Christe
- Department of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Radiology, Tiefenau Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Despite major advances in the management of patients with chronic pancreatitis, yet the disease remains an enigmatic process of uncertain pathogenesis, unpredictable clinical course, and unclear treatment. In most of the cases intractable pain is the main indication for surgical intervention. Furthermore complications related to adjacent organs, endoscopically not permanently controlled pancreatic pseudocysts, ductal pathology, conservatively intractable internal pancreatic fistula or suspected malignancy also require surgery. The ideal surgical approach should address all these problems — tailoring the various therapeutic options to meet the individual patient's needs. In our opinion, the ideal procedure for chronic pancreatitis is the duodenum preserving pancreatic head resection in terms of an extended drainage procedure, were the extent of the pancreatic head resection may be tailored to the morphology of the pancreatic gland, thus allowing a tailored concept (to resect and/or drain as much as necessary but as little as possible). Looking at the present data, there is no need to transsect the pancreatic axis above the portal vein. If portal vein thrombosis is present, an extended drainage procedure is mandatory without transsection of the neck of the pancreas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Mann
- Department of General-, Visceral- Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Qiu M, Qiu H, Jin Y, Wei X, Zhou Y, Wang Z, Wang D, Ren C, Luo H, Wang F, Zhang D, Wang F, Li Y, Yang D, Xu R. Pathologic Diagnosis of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma in the United States: Its Status and Prognostic Value. J Cancer 2016; 7:694-701. [PMID: 27076851 PMCID: PMC4829556 DOI: 10.7150/jca.14185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2015] [Accepted: 01/22/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Even with the development of new biopsy methods, diagnosis of pancreatic cancer is sometimes without histological evidence. The aim of our study is to find out the status of pancreatic cancer patients who are diagnosed without pathologic confirm and the prognostic value of pathologic diagnosis. Methods: We identified 52,759 pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Logistic regression model was used to identify factors relating to no pathologic diagnosis. Multivariable Cox regression model identified potential prognostic factors. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: There were 6206 (11.76%) patients without pathologic diagnosis. Older age, reported from nursing/convalescent home/hospice or physician's office/private medical practitioner, early year of diagnosis, larger tumor size, pancreatic head cancer, unmarried patients, uninsured and stage I disease all contributed to no pathologic diagnosis. Median cause specific-survival for patients with and without pathologic diagnosis were 7.72 and 3.52 months, respectively. The HR for pathologic diagnosis was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89-0.95), P<0.001. Conclusions: Pathologic diagnosis was an independent prognostic factor for pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients. New diagnostic methods are needed to get the pathologic diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miaozhen Qiu
- 1. Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, China.; 2. Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA
| | - Huijuan Qiu
- 3. Department of VIP, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Ying Jin
- 1. Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Xiaoli Wei
- 1. Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Yixin Zhou
- 3. Department of VIP, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Zixian Wang
- 1. Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Deshen Wang
- 1. Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Chao Ren
- 1. Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Huiyan Luo
- 1. Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Feng Wang
- 1. Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Dongsheng Zhang
- 1. Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Fenghua Wang
- 1. Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Yuhong Li
- 1. Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Dajun Yang
- 4. Department of Experimental Research, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ruihua Xu
- 1. Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou 510060, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Double-duct sign (combined dilatation of the common bile duct and pancreatic duct) is an infrequently encountered finding in cross-sectional radiological imaging of the pancreatobiliary system. This sign is commonly deemed to signify on ominous pathology and suggests the presence of pancreatic or biliary malignancy. METHODS We aim to correlate double-duct sign discovered on magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatogram (MRCP) in the clinical context. We retrospectively analyzed MRCP database over a period of 4 years, January 2010 to December 2013. Follow-up information was available for a median of 27 months (range, 12-42 months) RESULTS The commonest cause of double-duct sign was choledocholithiasis followed closely by pancreatobiliary malignancy. Patients with jaundice in the context of double-duct sign had a higher incidence of malignancy (48%). None of the anicteric patients were found to have malignancy (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS In patients with MRCP evidence of double-duct sign, the absence of jaundice makes a malignant etiology unlikely. Conversely, in jaundiced patients, a malignant cause is much more likely. Figures from larger series are needed to support this conclusion.
Collapse
|
18
|
Giljaca V, Gurusamy KS, Takwoingi Y, Higgie D, Poropat G, Štimac D, Davidson BR. Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 2015:CD011549. [PMID: 25719224 PMCID: PMC6464848 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) are tests used in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones in patients suspected of having common bile duct stones prior to undergoing invasive treatment. There has been no systematic review of the accuracy of EUS and MRCP in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones using appropriate reference standards. OBJECTIVES To determine and compare the accuracy of EUS and MRCP for the diagnosis of common bile duct stones. SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS, and Clinicaltrials.gov until September 2012. We searched the references of included studies to identify further studies and of systematic reviews identified from various databases (Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE), Health Technology Assessment (HTA), Medion, and ARIF (Aggressive Research Intelligence Facility)). We did not restrict studies based on language or publication status, or whether data were collected prospectively or retrospectively. SELECTION CRITERIA We included studies that provided the number of true positives, false positives, false negatives, and true negatives for EUS or MRCP. We only accepted studies that confirmed the presence of common bile duct stones by extraction of the stones (irrespective of whether this was done by surgical or endoscopic methods) for a positive test, and absence of common bile duct stones by surgical or endoscopic negative exploration of the common bile duct or symptom free follow-up for at least six months for a negative test, as the reference standard in people suspected of having common bile duct stones. We included participants with or without prior diagnosis of cholelithiasis; with or without symptoms and complications of common bile duct stones, with or without prior treatment for common bile duct stones; and before or after cholecystectomy. At least two authors independently screened abstracts and selected studies for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently collected the data from each study. We used the bivariate model to obtain pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity. MAIN RESULTS We included a total of 18 studies involving 2366 participants (976 participants with common bile duct stones and 1390 participants without common bile duct stones). Eleven studies evaluated EUS alone, and five studies evaluated MRCP alone. Two studies evaluated both tests. Most studies included patients who were suspected of having common bile duct stones based on abnormal liver function tests; abnormal transabdominal ultrasound; symptoms such as obstructive jaundice, cholangitis, or pancreatitis; or a combination of the above. The proportion of participants who had undergone cholecystectomy varied across studies. Not one of the studies was of high methodological quality. For EUS, the sensitivities ranged between 0.75 and 1.00 and the specificities ranged between 0.85 and 1.00. The summary sensitivity (95% confidence interval (CI)) and specificity (95% CI) of the 13 studies that evaluated EUS (1537 participants; 686 cases and 851 participants without common bile duct stones) were 0.95 (95% CI 0.91 to 0.97) and 0.97 (95% CI 0.94 to 0.99). For MRCP, the sensitivities ranged between 0.77 and 1.00 and the specificities ranged between 0.73 and 0.99. The summary sensitivity and specificity of the seven studies that evaluated MRCP (996 participants; 361 cases and 635 participants without common bile duct stones) were 0.93 (95% CI 0.87 to 0.96) and 0.96 (95% CI 0.90 to 0.98). There was no evidence of a difference in sensitivity or specificity between EUS and MRCP (P value = 0.5). From the included studies, at the median pre-test probability of common bile duct stones of 41% the post-test probabilities (with 95% CI) associated with positive and negative EUS test results were 0.96 (95% CI 0.92 to 0.98) and 0.03 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.06). At the same pre-test probability, the post-test probabilities associated with positive and negative MRCP test results were 0.94 (95% CI 0.87 to 0.97) and 0.05 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.09). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Both EUS and MRCP have high diagnostic accuracy for detection of common bile duct stones. People with positive EUS or MRCP should undergo endoscopic or surgical extraction of common bile duct stones and those with negative EUS or MRCP do not need further invasive tests. However, if the symptoms persist, further investigations will be indicated. The two tests are similar in terms of diagnostic accuracy and the choice of which test to use will be informed by availability and contra-indications to each test. However, it should be noted that the results are based on studies of poor methodological quality and so the results should be interpreted with caution. Further studies that are of high methodological quality are necessary to determine the diagnostic accuracy of EUS and MRCP for the diagnosis of common bile duct stones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanja Giljaca
- Clinical Hospital Centre RijekaDepartment of GastroenterologyKresimirova 42RijekaCroatia51000
| | - Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
- Royal Free Campus, UCL Medical SchoolDepartment of SurgeryRoyal Free HospitalRowland Hill StreetLondonUKNW3 2PF
| | - Yemisi Takwoingi
- University of BirminghamPublic Health, Epidemiology and BiostatisticsEdgbastonBirminghamUKB15 2TT
| | - David Higgie
- North Bristol NHS TrustFrenchay HospitalBristolUKBS16 1LE
| | - Goran Poropat
- Clinical Hospital Centre RijekaDepartment of GastroenterologyKresimirova 42RijekaCroatia51000
| | - Davor Štimac
- Clinical Hospital Centre RijekaDepartment of GastroenterologyKresimirova 42RijekaCroatia51000
| | - Brian R Davidson
- Royal Free Campus, UCL Medical SchoolDepartment of SurgeryRoyal Free HospitalRowland Hill StreetLondonUKNW3 2PF
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Gurusamy KS, Giljaca V, Takwoingi Y, Higgie D, Poropat G, Štimac D, Davidson BR. Ultrasound versus liver function tests for diagnosis of common bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 2015:CD011548. [PMID: 25719223 PMCID: PMC6464762 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ultrasound and liver function tests (serum bilirubin and serum alkaline phosphatase) are used as screening tests for the diagnosis of common bile duct stones in people suspected of having common bile duct stones. There has been no systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound and liver function tests. OBJECTIVES To determine and compare the accuracy of ultrasound versus liver function tests for the diagnosis of common bile duct stones. SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS, and Clinicaltrials.gov to September 2012. We searched the references of included studies to identify further studies and systematic reviews identified from various databases (Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Health Technology Assessment, Medion, and ARIF (Aggressive Research Intelligence Facility)). We did not restrict studies based on language or publication status, or whether data were collected prospectively or retrospectively. SELECTION CRITERIA We included studies that provided the number of true positives, false positives, false negatives, and true negatives for ultrasound, serum bilirubin, or serum alkaline phosphatase. We only accepted studies that confirmed the presence of common bile duct stones by extraction of the stones (irrespective of whether this was done by surgical or endoscopic methods) for a positive test result, and absence of common bile duct stones by surgical or endoscopic negative exploration of the common bile duct, or symptom-free follow-up for at least six months for a negative test result as the reference standard in people suspected of having common bile duct stones. We included participants with or without prior diagnosis of cholelithiasis; with or without symptoms and complications of common bile duct stones, with or without prior treatment for common bile duct stones; and before or after cholecystectomy. At least two authors screened abstracts and selected studies for inclusion independently. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently collected data from each study. Where meta-analysis was possible, we used the bivariate model to summarise sensitivity and specificity. MAIN RESULTS Five studies including 523 participants reported the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound. One studies (262 participants) compared the accuracy of ultrasound, serum bilirubin and serum alkaline phosphatase in the same participants. All the studies included people with symptoms. One study included only participants without previous cholecystectomy but this information was not available from the remaining studies. All the studies were of poor methodological quality. The sensitivities for ultrasound ranged from 0.32 to 1.00, and the specificities ranged from 0.77 to 0.97. The summary sensitivity was 0.73 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.90) and the specificity was 0.91 (95% CI 0.84 to 0.95). At the median pre-test probability of common bile duct stones of 0.408, the post-test probability (95% CI) associated with positive ultrasound tests was 0.85 (95% CI 0.75 to 0.91), and negative ultrasound tests was 0.17 (95% CI 0.08 to 0.33).The single study of liver function tests reported diagnostic accuracy at two cut-offs for bilirubin (greater than 22.23 μmol/L and greater than twice the normal limit) and two cut-offs for alkaline phosphatase (greater than 125 IU/L and greater than twice the normal limit). This study also assessed ultrasound and reported higher sensitivities for bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase at both cut-offs but the specificities of the markers were higher at only the greater than twice the normal limit cut-off. The sensitivity for ultrasound was 0.32 (95% CI 0.15 to 0.54), bilirubin (cut-off greater than 22.23 μmol/L) was 0.84 (95% CI 0.64 to 0.95), and alkaline phosphatase (cut-off greater than 125 IU/L) was 0.92 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.99). The specificity for ultrasound was 0.95 (95% CI 0.91 to 0.97), bilirubin (cut-off greater than 22.23 μmol/L) was 0.91 (95% CI 0.86 to 0.94), and alkaline phosphatase (cut-off greater than 125 IU/L) was 0.79 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.84). No study reported the diagnostic accuracy of a combination of bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase, or combinations with ultrasound. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Many people may have common bile duct stones in spite of having a negative ultrasound or liver function test. Such people may have to be re-tested with other modalities if the clinical suspicion of common bile duct stones is very high because of their symptoms. False-positive results are also possible and further non-invasive testing is recommended to confirm common bile duct stones to avoid the risks of invasive testing.It should be noted that these results were based on few studies of poor methodological quality and the results for ultrasound varied considerably between studies. Therefore, the results should be interpreted with caution. Further studies of high methodological quality are necessary to determine the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound and liver function tests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
- Department of Surgery, Royal Free Campus, UCL Medical School, Royal Free Hospital, Rowland Hill Street, London, UK, NW3 2PF.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Gurusamy KS, Giljaca V, Takwoingi Y, Higgie D, Poropat G, Štimac D, Davidson BR. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus intraoperative cholangiography for diagnosis of common bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 2015:CD010339. [PMID: 25719222 PMCID: PMC6464791 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010339.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) are tests used in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones in people suspected of having common bile duct stones. There has been no systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of ERCP and IOC. OBJECTIVES To determine and compare the accuracy of ERCP and IOC for the diagnosis of common bile duct stones. SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS, and Clinicaltrials.gov to September 2012. To identify additional studies, we searched the references of included studies and systematic reviews identified from various databases (Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE)), Health Technology Assessment (HTA), Medion, and ARIF (Aggressive Research Intelligence Facility)). We did not restrict studies based on language or publication status, or whether data were collected prospectively or retrospectively. SELECTION CRITERIA We included studies that provided the number of true positives, false positives, false negatives, and true negatives for ERCP or IOC. We only accepted studies that confirmed the presence of common bile duct stones by extraction of the stones (irrespective of whether this was done by surgical or endoscopic methods) for a positive test, and absence of common bile duct stones by surgical or endoscopic negative exploration of the common bile duct, or symptom-free follow-up for at least six months for a negative test as the reference standard in people suspected of having common bile duct stones. We included participants with or without prior diagnosis of cholelithiasis; with or without symptoms and complications of common bile duct stones; with or without prior treatment for common bile duct stones; and before or after cholecystectomy. At least two authors screened abstracts and selected studies for inclusion independently. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently collected data from each study. We used the bivariate model to summarise the sensitivity and specificity of the tests. MAIN RESULTS We identified five studies including 318 participants (180 participants with and 138 participants without common bile duct stones) that reported the diagnostic accuracy of ERCP and five studies including 654 participants (125 participants with and 529 participants without common bile duct stones) that reported the diagnostic accuracy of IOC. Most studies included people with symptoms (participants with jaundice or pancreatitis) suspected of having common bile duct stones based on blood tests, ultrasound, or both, prior to the performance of ERCP or IOC. Most studies included participants who had not previously undergone removal of the gallbladder (cholecystectomy). None of the included studies was of high methodological quality as evaluated by the QUADAS-2 tool (quality assessment tool for diagnostic accuracy studies). The sensitivities of ERCP ranged between 0.67 and 0.94 and the specificities ranged between 0.92 and 1.00. For ERCP, the summary sensitivity was 0.83 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72 to 0.90) and specificity was 0.99 (95% CI 0.94 to 1.00). The sensitivities of IOC ranged between 0.75 and 1.00 and the specificities ranged between 0.96 and 1.00. For IOC, the summary sensitivity was 0.99 (95% CI 0.83 to 1.00) and specificity was 0.99 (95% CI 0.95 to 1.00). For ERCP, at the median pre-test probability of common bile duct stones of 0.35 estimated from the included studies (i.e., 35% of people suspected of having common bile duct stones were confirmed to have gallstones by the reference standard), the post-test probabilities associated with positive test results was 0.97 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.99) and negative test results was 0.09 (95% CI 0.05 to 0.14). For IOC, at the median pre-test probability of common bile duct stones of 0.35, the post-test probabilities associated with positive test results was 0.98 (95% CI 0.85 to 1.00) and negative test results was 0.01 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.10). There was weak evidence of a difference in sensitivity (P value = 0.05) with IOC showing higher sensitivity than ERCP. There was no evidence of a difference in specificity (P value = 0.7) with both tests having similar specificity. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Although the sensitivity of IOC appeared to be better than that of ERCP, this finding may be unreliable because none of the studies compared both tests in the same study populations and most of the studies were methodologically flawed. It appears that both tests were fairly accurate in guiding further invasive treatment as most people diagnosed with common bile duct stones by these tests had common bile duct stones. Some people may have common bile duct stones in spite of having a negative ERCP or IOC result. Such people may have to be re-tested if the clinical suspicion of common bile duct stones is very high because of their symptoms or persistently abnormal liver function tests. However, the results should be interpreted with caution given the limited quantity and quality of the evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
- Department of Surgery, Royal Free Campus, UCL Medical School, Royal Free Hospital, Rowland Hill Street, London, UK, NW3 2PF.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Oppong KW, Mitra V, Scott J, Anderson K, Charnley RM, Bonnington S, Jaques B, White S, French JJ, Manas DM, Sen G, Nayar MK. Endoscopic ultrasound in patients with normal liver blood tests and unexplained dilatation of common bile duct and or pancreatic duct. Scand J Gastroenterol 2014; 49:473-80. [PMID: 24472065 DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2014.881547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the yield of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the investigation of patients with normal liver function tests (LFTs) and unexplained dilatation of common bile duct (CBD) and/or pancreatic duct (PD), following CT and/or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. MATERIALS AND METHODS Consecutive patients undergoing linear EUS between January 2007 and August 2011 for the indication of dilated CBD and/or PD, normal LFT, and nondiagnostic cross-sectional imaging formed the study group. The study was performed as a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. RESULTS During the study period, 83 patients (CBD and PD dilatation n = 38, PD dilatation n = 5, CBD dilatation n = 40) met the inclusion criteria and underwent EUS. Five (13.1%) of the CBD and PD groups had a new finding, which in one (2.6%) case was causal. In this group, men were significantly more likely to have a new finding (p = 0.012). Eight (20%) of the CBD group had a new finding, which in seven (17.5%) cases was causal. In the CBD group, cholecystectomy was significantly (p = 0.005) more common in those without a finding. Three (60%) of the PD group had a finding on EUS, all of which were causal, including a case of pancreatic malignancy. CONCLUSION There is a significant yield from EUS in individuals with isolated PD dilatation and isolated CBD dilatation. Previous cholecystectomy is significantly associated with a negative EUS in the group with isolated CBD dilatation. The yield in those with CBD and PD dilatation was low and a finding was more likely in males.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kofi W Oppong
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Unit, Freeman Hospital , Newcastle upon Tyne , UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Analysis of risk factors for pancreatic duct stones formation in patients with alcoholic chronic pancreatitis. Pancreatology 2014; 14:109-13. [PMID: 24650964 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2014.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2013] [Revised: 01/20/2014] [Accepted: 01/21/2014] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alcoholic chronic pancreatitis (ACP) is the dominant cause of chronic pancreatitis (CP). As a main complication of CP, the formation of pancreatic duct stones (PDS) compromises pancreatic function and symptomatic patients are often subjected to aggressive treatments. The present study aimed to identify PDS risk factors in patients with ACP. METHODS A retrospective analysis of 93 ACP patients was performed; patients were divided into two groups: ACP with PDS (n = 48) and ACP without PDS (n = 45). Fourteen potential factors were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses to identify independent risk factors of PDS formation in ACP patients. A comparison of demographic and clinical characteristics between ACP patients with PDS and non-ACP patients with PDS (n = 43) was also carried out. RESULTS ACP accounted for 47.7% (93/195) of CP in this cohort. Among ACP patients, the morbidity of PDS was 51.6% (48/93). Significant risk factors of PDS formation for ACP patients included duration of drinking ≥24.7 years (OR, 9.036; 95% CI, 2.737-29.837; p < 0.001); daily alcohol consumption ≥147.0 g (OR, 3.147; 95% CI, 1.040-9.522; p = 0.042); and MPD narrowing (OR, 7.245; 95% CI, 2.205-23.811; p = 0.001). Shorter periods between diagnosis and PDS formation (PDP) were observed in ACP patients than non-ACP patients. CONCLUSIONS Alcohol consumption accelerates the progression of PDS formation in patients with CP.
Collapse
|
23
|
Walker NF, Warren OJ, Gawn L, Jiao LR. The role of genetic testing in management of hereditary chronic pancreatitis. JRSM SHORT REPORTS 2013; 4:6. [PMID: 23413408 PMCID: PMC3572660 DOI: 10.1258/shorts.2012.012071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Long R Jiao
- HPB Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Usefulness of brush cytology combined with pancreatic juice cytology in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: significance of pancreatic juice cytology after brushing. Pancreas 2012; 41:1225-9. [PMID: 23086246 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0b013e31825d60fc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Pancreatic juice cytology (PJC) and brush cytology (BC) performed during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography could make a definite diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. The aim of this study was to improve the diagnostic value of cytology performed during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. METHODS The subjects comprised 127 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and 74 with benign pancreatic duct stricture mimicking PDAC. Final diagnosis was confirmed based on histopathology by resection or on more than 1 year of follow up. Pancreatic juice cytology was examined before and after BC. And the sensitivity of PJC combined with BC was examined. RESULTS No malignancy was detected by PJC or by BC in patients with benign pancreatic duct strictures (specificity, 100%). In those with PDAC, the sensitivity of PJC before and after brushing was 21.3% and 40.9%, respectively; that of BC was 48.8%. Of 65 patients with PDAC, in whom neither PJC before brushing nor BC indicated malignancy, 16 were diagnosed with pancreatic cancer using PJC after brushing. Brush cytology combined with PJC after brushing significantly raised the diagnostic sensitivity for PDAC to 61.4%. CONCLUSIONS Diagnosis of pancreatic cancer based on BC combined with PJC after brushing was more reliable than PJC before brushing or BC.
Collapse
|
25
|
Dilation of both pancreatic duct and the common bile duct on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging scans in patients with or without obstructive jaundice. Pancreas 2012; 41:767-72. [PMID: 22450366 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0b013e31823ba536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES "Double-duct sign" (strictures in both common bile duct [CBD] and pancreatic duct [PD] with proximal dilation) on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is considered suggestive of pancreatic malignancy. Dilation of CBD and PD is frequently noted on computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging scans, sometimes found incidentally in patients without jaundice. The prevalence of malignancy in these patients is not established. METHODS In this retrospective analysis, consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) at a tertiary care hospital from 2002 to 2006 for suspected pancreatic malignancy and had double-duct sign on imaging were included. We evaluated (1) prevalence of malignancy in patients with or without obstructive jaundice and (2) performance characteristics of EUS-fine-needle aspiration (FNA) in diagnosing malignancy in this setting. RESULTS A final diagnosis of pancreatic malignancy was made in 142 (85.5%) of 166 patients with and 4 (5.9%) of 68 without obstructive jaundice (P < 0.005). The accuracy of EUS-FNA for diagnosing malignancy in patients with or without obstructive jaundice was 92.8% versus 98.5%. CONCLUSIONS Dilation of both PD and CBD on computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging scans is suggestive of pancreatic malignancy. The prevalence of malignancy, however, is markedly lower in patients without obstructive jaundice but is clinically significant and merits further diagnostic evaluation. Endoscopic ultrasound-FNA is highly accurate for diagnosing malignancy in this setting.
Collapse
|
26
|
Perez-Johnston R, Sainani NI, Sahani DV. Imaging of Chronic Pancreatitis (Including Groove and Autoimmune Pancreatitis). Radiol Clin North Am 2012; 50:447-66. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2012.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
27
|
Abstract
Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a debilitating disease that can result in chronic abdominal pain, malnutrition, and other related complications. The main aims of treatment are to control symptoms, prevent disease progression, and correct any complications. A multidisciplinary approach involving medical, endoscopic, and surgical therapy is important. Endoscopic therapy plays a specific role in carefully selected patients as primary interventional therapy when medical measures fail or in patients who are not suitable for surgery. Endoscopic therapy is also used as a bridge to surgery or as a means to assess the potential response to pancreatic surgery. This review addresses the role of endoscopic therapy in relief of obstruction of the pancreatic duct (PD) and bile du ct, closure of PD leaks, and drainage of pseudocysts in CP. The role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus block for pain in chronic pancreatitis is also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damien Meng Yew Tan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
The diagnosis and treatment of patients with pancreatic strictures presents a multitude of clinical challenges. The etiology of pancreatic strictures is varied, including benign strictures subsequent to acute pancreatitis, trauma, postsurgical, post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), and malignancy. Patients with strictures usually present with symptoms of recurrent pancreatitis, abdominal pain, weight loss, and/or steatorrhea. The absence of a prior history of pancreatitis or surgery increases the likelihood of malignancy. High-quality imaging studies of the pancreas, CT, MRI/magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) scanning are utilized for better definition. Imaging detects an associated mass and/or demonstrates the ductal anatomy. Invasive procedures such as ERCP are performed to better define the causal relationships of the patient's symptoms or to obtain tissue diagnosis. Treatment goals include ameliorating symptoms, dilating the stricture, and ruling out cancer. The risk of malignancy underlies much of the intervention, which includes serology, cytologic analysis, and serial imaging. EUS has become the procedure of choice to rule out a mass, to evaluate the parenchyma for evidence of chronic pancreatitis, and to obtain fine-needle biopsies for tissue confirmation. In symptomatic patients or patients with indeterminate strictures, ERCP is used for direct pancreatography, tissue acquisition, and endoscopic treatment. Endotherapy includes sphincterotomy, dilation, and stenting to provide drainage. We view ERCP as the optimal first-line treatment modality. ERCP offers the potential of curative treatment and is less invasive than surgery, especially as some patients' symptoms are not severe enough to justify surgery. If patients do not experience relief of symptoms after several sessions of endoscopic therapy, surgery is the logical next step for definitive, long-term treatment.
Collapse
|
29
|
Tempero MA, Arnoletti JP, Behrman S, Ben-Josef E, Benson AB, Berlin JD, Cameron JL, Casper ES, Cohen SJ, Duff M, Ellenhorn JDI, Hawkins WG, Hoffman JP, Kuvshinoff BW, Malafa MP, Muscarella P, Nakakura EK, Sasson AR, Thayer SP, Tyler DS, Warren RS, Whiting S, Willett C, Wolff RA. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2010; 8:972-1017. [PMID: 20876541 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2010.0073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 140] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
30
|
Abstract
Chronic pancreatitis (CP) can have debilitating clinical course due to chronic abdominal pain, malnutrition and related complications. Medical, endoscopic and surgical treatment of CP should aim at control of symptoms, prevention of progression of the disease and correction of complications. Endoscopic management plays a specific role in carefully selected patients as primary interventional therapy when medical measures fail or in high-risk surgical candidates. Endotherapy for CP is utilized also as a bridge to surgery or to assess potential response to pancreatic surgery. In this review we address the role of endotherapy for the relief of obstruction of the pancreatic duct (PD) and bile duct, closure of PD leaks and drainage of pseudocysts in the setting of CP. In addition, endotherapy for relief of pancreatic pain by endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus block for CP is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haritha Avula
- Division of Gastroenterology/ Hepatology, Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Stuart Sherman
- Division of Gastroenterology/ Hepatology, Indiana University Medical Center - Internal Medicine, UH 4100, IN 46202, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Ringold DA, Shah RJ. Peroral pancreatoscopy in the diagnosis and management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia and indeterminate pancreatic duct pathology. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2009; 19:601-13. [PMID: 19917466 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2009.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Peroral pancreatoscopy (POP) is an exciting modality for the evaluation of pancreatic diseases. It has proved efficacy in the evaluation of suspected intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia and allows for a determination of the presence and extent of pancreatic duct involvement. When other imaging modalities are inconclusive, POP seems a useful adjunct in the evaluation of indeterminate pancreatic duct strictures and permits tissue sampling under direct vision. Despite recent advances, refinements in endoscope caliber, tip deflection, and optics are still required for more routine application in pancreatic diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel A Ringold
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Denver, MS F735, 1635 Aurora Court, Room AIP 2.031, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Powell AC, Hajdu CH, Megibow AJ, Shamamian P. Nonfunctioning Pancreatic Endocrine Neoplasm Presenting as Asymptomatic, Isolated Pancreatic Duct Stricture: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Am Surg 2008. [DOI: 10.1177/000313480807400217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Morphologic irregularities of the pancreatic duct are often noted on abdominal imaging studies obtained for unrelated symptoms or conditions. We report the case of a patient who was found to have an incidental, isolated pancreatic duct dilatation on multiple imaging studies and who was found to have a nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine neoplasm at resection. His prognosis is excellent based on the histology of the lesion and a curative resection. This case highlights the importance of fully investigating incidental pancreatic duct abnormalities regardless of the setting in which they are found.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Alec J. Megibow
- Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Peter Shamamian
- From the Departments of Surgery
- Veterans Administration New York Harbor Healthcare System (New York Campus), New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge Ahualli
- Department of Computed Tomography, Centro Radiológico Luis Méndez Collado, Muñecas 444, San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán 4000, Argentina.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Topazian M, Aslanian H, Andersen D. Outcome following endoscopic stenting of pancreatic duct strictures in chronic pancreatitis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2005; 39:908-11. [PMID: 16208117 DOI: 10.1097/01.mcg.0000180799.18834.99] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
GOALS To assess outcomes following 6 months of endoscopic stenting for dominant pancreatic duct strictures in painful chronic pancreatitis. BACKGROUND Pancreatic stent placement may improve pain in chronic pancreatitis. Long-term outcomes after a 6-month period of stenting are unknown. STUDY We identified all patients with chronic pancreatitis who underwent stenting of a dominant pancreatic duct stricture at one hospital. Stents were left in place for 6 months. Changes in weight, hospital visits, and narcotic use were analyzed. RESULTS Mean follow-up for the 15 subjects was 36 months; 87% improved following stent placement, and 11 (73%) completed 6 months of stent therapy. Hospital visits per subject decreased from 3.6 in the year prior to stent placement to 0.1 in the year after stent removal (P < 0.01). Oral narcotic use decreased from 33 mg MSO4/day in the month prior to stenting to 2 mg MSO4/day in the 12 months after stent removal (P = 0.01). Mean weight change was -5 kg in the year prior to stenting and +3.2 kg in the year after stent insertion (P < 0.01); 36% required endoscopic reintervention during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS Six months of stenting resulted in sustained clinical improvement in most patients with chronic pancreatitis and a dominant pancreatic duct stricture. Stenting was associated with subsequent weight gain, fewer hospital visits, and less narcotic use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Topazian
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55906, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
McMasters KM. What's new in surgical oncology. J Am Coll Surg 2005; 200:937-45. [PMID: 15922209 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2005] [Accepted: 03/09/2005] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly M McMasters
- Department of Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY 40292, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
|