1
|
Song Y, Zhang YY, Yu Q, Ma R, Xiao Y, Shen JK, Wei CG. Modified LR-5 criteria based on gadoxetic acid can improve the sensitivity in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Radiol 2025; 17:103822. [DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i3.103822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2024] [Revised: 01/24/2025] [Accepted: 02/21/2025] [Indexed: 03/27/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Currently, only tumors classified as LR-5 are considered definitive hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and no further pathologic confirmation is required to initiate therapy. Previous studies have shown that the sensitivity of LR-5 is modest, and lesions enhanced by gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) may exhibit lower sensitivity than those enhanced by Gd-DTPA.
AIM To identify malignant ancillary features (AFs) that can independently and significantly predict HCC in Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2018, and to develop modified LR-5 criteria to improve diagnostic performance on Gd-EOB-DTPA - enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
METHODS Imaging data from patients with HCC risk factors who underwent abdominal Gd-EOB-DTPA - enhanced magnetic resonance imaging were collected. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine AFs that could independently and significantly predict HCC. The modified LR-5 criteria involved reclassifying LR-4/LR-3 lesions based on major features combined with independently significant AFs for HCC, or by substituting threshold growth with significant AFs. McNemar's test was used to compare the diagnostic performance of the modified LR-5 criteria.
RESULTS A total of 244 lesions from 216 patients were included. Transitional phase hypointensity, mild - moderate T2 hyperintensity, and fat in mass (more than adjacent liver) were identified as significant independent predictors of HCC. Using the modified LR-5 criteria (e.g., LR-5-M1: LR-4 + transitional phase hypointensity; LR-5-M4: LR-5 by transitional phase hypointensity instead of threshold growth; LR-5-M5: LR-5 by mild - moderate T2 hyperintensity instead of threshold growth; LR-5-M8: LR-3/LR-4 + any two features of transitional phase hypointensity/mild - moderate T2 hyperintensity/fat in mass), sensitivities were significantly increased (88.5%-89.1%) compared to the standard LR-5 (60.6%; all P values < 0.05), while specificities (84.8%-89.9%) remained largely unchanged (93.7%; all P values > 0.05). The LR-5-M8 criterion achieved the highest sensitivity.
CONCLUSION Mild - moderate T2 hyperintensity, transitional phase hypointensity, and fat in mass are independent and significant predictors of HCC malignant AFs. The modified LR-5 criteria can improve sensitivity without significantly reducing specificity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Song
- Department of Radiology, Jieshou City People's Hospital (Jieshou Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical College), Fuyang 236500, Anhui Province, China
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Yue-Yue Zhang
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Qin Yu
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, Jiangsu Province, China
- Department of Radiology, Dongtai City People's Hospital, Yancheng 224200, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Rui Ma
- Department of Dialysis Center, Jieshou City People's Hospital (Jieshou Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical College), Fuyang 236500, Anhui Province, China
| | - Yue Xiao
- Department of Intensive Care Unit, Jieshou City People's Hospital (Jieshou Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical College), Fuyang 236500, Anhui Province, China
| | - Jun-Kang Shen
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Chao-Gang Wei
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, Jiangsu Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhou S, Zhou G, Shen Y, Xia T, Zhao B, Sun Z, Gao L, Li B, Wang W, Zhang S, Opara NC, Chen X, Ju S, Wang YC. LI-RADS Nonradiation Treatment Response Algorithm Version 2024: Diagnostic Performance and Impact of Ancillary Features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2025; 224:e2432035. [PMID: 39535775 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.24.32035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND. LI-RADS Treatment Response Algorithm (TRA) version 2024 (v2024) introduced separate algorithms for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) viability after radiation and nonradiation locoregional therapies (LRTs). The nonradiation algorithm incorporated MRI-based ancillary features to optionally upgrade lesions from LR-TR Equivocal to LR-TR Viable. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of LI-RADS Nonradiation TRA v2024 with that of LI-RADS TRA version 2017 (v2017) and modified RECIST (mRECIST) for evaluating HCC response to LRT on MRI, with attention given to the impact of ancillary features. METHODS. This retrospective study included 231 patients (198 men and 33 women; median age, 56 years) who underwent LRT for HCC followed by liver resection or transplant between January 2017 and December 2022. Two radiologists (reader 1 and reader 2) independently evaluated treated lesions (n = 306) using LI-RADS Nonradiation TRA v2024, LI-RADS TRA v2017, and mRECIST. Lesions were classified as showing pathologic viability (n = 249) or complete pathologic necrosis (n = 57) based on curative surgery pathology. The diagnostic performance for pathologic viability was compared using Bonferroni-adjusted McNemar tests, with LR-TR Equivocal assessments classified as test negative. RESULTS. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for LI-RADS Nonradiation TRA v2024 with ancillary features were 85.5%, 75.4%, and 83.7%, respectively, for reader 1 and 87.2%, 63.2%, and 82.7%, respectively, for reader 2; for LI-RADS Nonradiation TRA v2024 without ancillary features, they were 81.1%, 78.9%, and 80.7%, respectively, for reader 1 and 80.3%, 78.9%, and 80.1%, respectively, for reader 2; for LI-RADS TRA v2017, they were 79.9%, 82.5%, and 80.4%, respectively, for reader 1 and 79.1%, 79.0%, and 79.1%, respectively, for reader 2; and for mRECIST, they were 83.9%, 54.4%, and 78.4%, respectively, for reader 1 and 87.2%, 40.4%, and 78.4%, respectively, for reader 2. LI-RADS Nonradiation TRA v2024 with ancillary features showed higher sensitivity and accuracy than LI-RADS Nonradiation v2024 without ancillary features (both readers), higher sensitivity than LI-RADS TRA v2017 (both readers), higher specificity than mRECIST (both readers), and higher accuracy than LI-RADS TRA v2017 (reader 2) (p < .008); remaining comparisons between LI-RADS Nonradiation TRA v2024 with ancillary features and other systems were not significant (p > .008). CONCLUSION. LI-RADS Nonradiation TRA v2024 showed good diagnostic performance in detecting pathologic viability. Ancillary features yielded improved sensitivity and accuracy without a significant change in specificity. CLINICAL IMPACT. Use of LI-RADS Nonradiation TRA v2024 with ancillary features is recommended for guiding prognostic assessments and treatment decisions after LRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuwei Zhou
- Department of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, Nurturing Center of Jiangsu Province for State Laboratory of AI Imaging & Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine, Southeast University, 87 Dingjiaqiao Rd, Gulou District, Nanjing 210009, China
| | - Guofeng Zhou
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China
| | - Yang Shen
- Department of Radiology, The Peoples Hospital of Xuyi County, Huaian, China
| | - Tianyi Xia
- Department of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, Nurturing Center of Jiangsu Province for State Laboratory of AI Imaging & Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine, Southeast University, 87 Dingjiaqiao Rd, Gulou District, Nanjing 210009, China
| | - Ben Zhao
- Department of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, Nurturing Center of Jiangsu Province for State Laboratory of AI Imaging & Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine, Southeast University, 87 Dingjiaqiao Rd, Gulou District, Nanjing 210009, China
| | - Ziying Sun
- Department of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, Nurturing Center of Jiangsu Province for State Laboratory of AI Imaging & Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine, Southeast University, 87 Dingjiaqiao Rd, Gulou District, Nanjing 210009, China
| | - Lei Gao
- Department of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, Nurturing Center of Jiangsu Province for State Laboratory of AI Imaging & Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine, Southeast University, 87 Dingjiaqiao Rd, Gulou District, Nanjing 210009, China
| | - Binrong Li
- Department of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, Nurturing Center of Jiangsu Province for State Laboratory of AI Imaging & Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine, Southeast University, 87 Dingjiaqiao Rd, Gulou District, Nanjing 210009, China
| | - Weilang Wang
- Department of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, Nurturing Center of Jiangsu Province for State Laboratory of AI Imaging & Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine, Southeast University, 87 Dingjiaqiao Rd, Gulou District, Nanjing 210009, China
| | - Shuhang Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, Nurturing Center of Jiangsu Province for State Laboratory of AI Imaging & Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine, Southeast University, 87 Dingjiaqiao Rd, Gulou District, Nanjing 210009, China
| | - Noble C Opara
- Department of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, Nurturing Center of Jiangsu Province for State Laboratory of AI Imaging & Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine, Southeast University, 87 Dingjiaqiao Rd, Gulou District, Nanjing 210009, China
| | - Xunjun Chen
- Department of Radiology, The Peoples Hospital of Xuyi County, Huaian, China
| | - Shenghong Ju
- Department of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, Nurturing Center of Jiangsu Province for State Laboratory of AI Imaging & Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine, Southeast University, 87 Dingjiaqiao Rd, Gulou District, Nanjing 210009, China
| | - Yuan-Cheng Wang
- Department of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, Nurturing Center of Jiangsu Province for State Laboratory of AI Imaging & Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine, Southeast University, 87 Dingjiaqiao Rd, Gulou District, Nanjing 210009, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Matsuda K, Ueno A, Tsuzaki J, Kurebayashi Y, Masugi Y, Yamazaki K, Tamura M, Abe Y, Hasegawa Y, Kitago M, Jinzaki M, Sakamoto M. Vessels encapsulating tumor clusters contribute to the intratumor heterogeneity of HCC on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI. Hepatol Commun 2025; 9:e0593. [PMID: 39670871 PMCID: PMC11637751 DOI: 10.1097/hc9.0000000000000593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2024] [Accepted: 10/14/2024] [Indexed: 12/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vessels encapsulating tumor clusters (VETC) pattern is tumor vasculature of HCC and is a predictor of prognosis and therapeutic efficacy. Recent radiological studies have demonstrated the predictability of VETC from preoperative images, but the mechanisms of image formation are not elucidated. This study aims to determine the relationship between VETC and intratumor heterogeneity in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (EOB-MRI) and to provide its pathological evidence. METHODS Radiologists visually classified preoperative arterial- and hepatobiliary-phase EOB-MRI images of 204 surgically resected HCCs into patterns based on heterogeneity and signal intensity; these classifications were validated using texture analysis. Single and multiplex immunohistochemistry for CD34, h-caldesmon, and OATP1B3 were performed to evaluate VETC, arterial vessel density (AVD), and OATP1B3 expression. Recurrence-free survival was assessed using the generalized Wilcoxon test. The contribution of clinicoradiological factors to the prediction of VETC was evaluated by random forest and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression. RESULTS VETC was frequently found in tumors with arterial-phase heterogeneous hyper-enhancement patterns and in tumors with hepatobiliary-phase heterogeneous hyperintense/isointense patterns (HBP-Hetero). AVD and OATP1B3 expression positively correlated with signal intensity in the arterial and hepatobiliary phases, respectively. Intratumor spatial analysis revealed that AVD and OATP1B3 expression were lower in VETC regions than in tumor regions without VETC. Patients with HBP-Hetero tumors had shorter recurrence-free survival. Machine learning models highlighted the importance of serum PIVKA-II, tumor size, and enhancement pattern of arterial and hepatobiliary phase for VETC prediction. CONCLUSIONS VETC is associated with local reductions of both AVD and OATP1B3 expression, likely contributing to heterogeneous enhancement patterns in EOB-MRI. Evaluation of the arterial and hepatobiliary phases of EOB-MRI would enhance the predictability of VETC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kosuke Matsuda
- Department of Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Akihisa Ueno
- Department of Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Division of Diagnostic Pathology, Keio University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Junya Tsuzaki
- Department of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yutaka Kurebayashi
- Department of Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yohei Masugi
- Department of Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Division of Diagnostic Pathology, Keio University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ken Yamazaki
- Department of Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masashi Tamura
- Department of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuta Abe
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasushi Hasegawa
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Minoru Kitago
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masahiro Jinzaki
- Department of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Michiie Sakamoto
- Department of Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kamal O, Roudenko A, Diab M, Shenoy-Bhangle A, Lee J, Sirlin CB, Fung A, Elsayes KM. Common pitfalls and diagnostic challenges in the application of LI-RADS CT/MRI algorithms: a comprehensive review. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024:10.1007/s00261-024-04778-8. [PMID: 39718628 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04778-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2024] [Revised: 12/14/2024] [Accepted: 12/16/2024] [Indexed: 12/25/2024]
Abstract
The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) was developed to standardize the interpretation and reporting of liver observations in at-risk populations, aiding in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Despite its advantages, the application of LI-RADS can be challenging due to the complexity of liver pathology and imaging interpretation. This comprehensive review highlights common pitfalls encountered in LI-RADS application and offers practical strategies to enhance diagnostic accuracy and consistency among radiologists. Key areas of difficulty include misapplication in non-high-risk populations, misinterpretation of major imaging features such as arterial phase hyperenhancement and washout, and incorrect application of ancillary features. Additionally, the review addresses challenges related to atypical HCC presentations and HCC mimics. By recognizing and addressing these pitfalls, radiologists can improve diagnostic accuracy and avoid common mistakes in the diagnosis of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omar Kamal
- Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
| | | | - Mahmoud Diab
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
- Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt
| | | | - James Lee
- University of Kentucky, Lexington, USA
| | - Claude B Sirlin
- Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, USA
| | - Alice Fung
- Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chen Z, Zhu Y, Wang L, Cong R, Feng B, Cai W, Liang M, Li D, Wang S, Hu M, Mi Y, Wang S, Ma X, Zhao X. Virtual MR Elastography and Multi-b-value DWI Models for Predicting Microvascular Invasion in Solitary BCLC Stage A Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Acad Radiol 2024:S1076-6332(24)00871-7. [PMID: 39643466 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2024.11.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2024] [Revised: 11/07/2024] [Accepted: 11/11/2024] [Indexed: 12/09/2024]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES To evaluate the performance of virtual MR elastography (vMRE) for predicting microvascular invasion (MVI) in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A (≤ 5.0 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to construct a combined nomogram based on vMRE, multi-b-value DWI models, and clinical-radiological (CR) features. METHODS Consecutive patients with suspected HCC who underwent multi-b-value DWI examinations were prospectively collected. Quantitative parameters from vMRE, mono-exponential, intravoxel incoherent motion, and diffusion kurtosis imaging models were obtained. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent MVI predictors and build prediction models. A combined MRI_Score was constructed using independent quantitative parameters. A visualized nomogram was built based on significant CR features and MRI_Score. The predictive performance of quantitative parameters and models was evaluated. RESULTS The study included 103 patients (median age: 56 years; range: 35-70 years; 87 males and 16 females). Diffusion-based shear modulus (μDiff) exhibited a predictive performance for MVI with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.735. The MRI_Score was developed employing true diffusion coefficient (D), mean kurtosis (MK), and μDiff. CR model and MRI_Score achieved AUCs of 0.787 and 0.840, respectively. The combined nomogram based on AFP, corona enhancement, tumor capsule, TTPVI, and MRI_Score significantly improved the predictive performance to an AUC of 0.931 (Delong test p < 0.05). CONCLUSION vMRE exhibited great potential for predicting MVI in BCLC stage A HCC. The combined nomogram integrating CR features, vMRE, and quantitative diffusion parameters significantly improved the predictive accuracy and could potentially assist clinicians in identifying appropriate treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaowei Chen
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China (Z.C., Y.Z., L.W., R.C., B.F., W.C., M.L., D.L., S.W., M.H., Y.M., X.M., X.Z.).
| | - Yongjian Zhu
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China (Z.C., Y.Z., L.W., R.C., B.F., W.C., M.L., D.L., S.W., M.H., Y.M., X.M., X.Z.).
| | - Leyao Wang
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China (Z.C., Y.Z., L.W., R.C., B.F., W.C., M.L., D.L., S.W., M.H., Y.M., X.M., X.Z.).
| | - Rong Cong
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China (Z.C., Y.Z., L.W., R.C., B.F., W.C., M.L., D.L., S.W., M.H., Y.M., X.M., X.Z.).
| | - Bing Feng
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China (Z.C., Y.Z., L.W., R.C., B.F., W.C., M.L., D.L., S.W., M.H., Y.M., X.M., X.Z.).
| | - Wei Cai
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China (Z.C., Y.Z., L.W., R.C., B.F., W.C., M.L., D.L., S.W., M.H., Y.M., X.M., X.Z.).
| | - Meng Liang
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China (Z.C., Y.Z., L.W., R.C., B.F., W.C., M.L., D.L., S.W., M.H., Y.M., X.M., X.Z.).
| | - Dengfeng Li
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China (Z.C., Y.Z., L.W., R.C., B.F., W.C., M.L., D.L., S.W., M.H., Y.M., X.M., X.Z.).
| | - Shuang Wang
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China (Z.C., Y.Z., L.W., R.C., B.F., W.C., M.L., D.L., S.W., M.H., Y.M., X.M., X.Z.).
| | - Mancang Hu
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China (Z.C., Y.Z., L.W., R.C., B.F., W.C., M.L., D.L., S.W., M.H., Y.M., X.M., X.Z.).
| | - Yongtao Mi
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China (Z.C., Y.Z., L.W., R.C., B.F., W.C., M.L., D.L., S.W., M.H., Y.M., X.M., X.Z.).
| | - Sicong Wang
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging Research, General Electric Healthcare (China), Beijing 100176, China (S.W.).
| | - Xiaohong Ma
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China (Z.C., Y.Z., L.W., R.C., B.F., W.C., M.L., D.L., S.W., M.H., Y.M., X.M., X.Z.).
| | - Xinming Zhao
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China (Z.C., Y.Z., L.W., R.C., B.F., W.C., M.L., D.L., S.W., M.H., Y.M., X.M., X.Z.).
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jiang H, Cannella R, Wu Z, Beaufrère A, Dioguardi Burgio M, Sartoris R, Wang Y, Qin Y, Chen J, Chen Y, Chen W, Shi Y, Song B, Ronot M. Prognostic Implications of MRI-assessed Intratumoral Fat in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Asian and European Cohort Study. Radiology 2024; 313:e233471. [PMID: 39499179 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.233471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2024]
Abstract
Background The clinicopathologic-radiologic and prognostic characteristics of intratumoral fat in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are critical for personalized treatment but remain understudied. Purpose To investigate the clinicopathologic-radiologic associations and prognostic implications of MRI-assessed intratumoral fat in HCCs. Materials and Methods This retrospective cohort study included consecutive adult patients who underwent resection for solitary HCCs and preoperative contrast-enhanced MRI from two tertiary-care hospitals in East Asia (March 2011 to December 2021) and Western Europe (September 2012 to December 2019). MRI scans were independently evaluated by three radiologists at each hospital. Based on Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2018, intratumoral fat was defined as "fat in mass more than adjacent liver," and the homogeneous subtype was defined as intratumoral fat "in absence of mosaic and nodule-in-nodule architecture." Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Cox regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with RFS and OS. Results A total of 933 patients were included in the Asian (n = 736; median age, 53 years [IQR, 45-62 years]; 626 male) and European (n = 207; median age, 64 years [IQR, 55-70 years]; 161 male) cohorts. MRI-assessed intratumoral fat was detected in 30% (215 of 726) and 31% (64 of 207) of patients in the Asian and European cohorts, respectively (P = .72). In both cohorts, the steatohepatitic subtype, nonperipheral washout, enhancing capsule, and mosaic architecture were more frequent in tumors with intratumoral fat (P value range, <.001 to .04). Intratumoral fat in general was not associated with RFS or OS in either cohort (P value range, .48-.97). However, in the Asian cohort, homogeneous intratumoral fat was associated with longer RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60; P = .009) and OS (HR, 0.33; P = .008) in multivariable Cox regression analyses. Conclusion MRI-assessed intratumoral fat was more frequent in steatohepatitic HCCs and associated with nonperipheral washout, enhancing capsule, and mosaic architecture. Although intratumoral fat was generally nonprognostic, homogeneous intratumoral fat was associated with longer RFS and OS in the Asian cohort. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Harmath in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanyu Jiang
- From the Department of Radiology, Functional and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., Y.W., Y.Q., J.C., Y.C., W.C., B.S.); Université Paris Cité, UMR 1149, CRI, Paris & Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Beaujon, APHP.Nord, Clichy 92110, France (R.C., M.D.B., R.S., M.R.); Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy (R.C.); Laboratory of Pathology, Key Laboratory of Transplant Engineering and Immunology, NHC, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (Z.W., Y.S.); Université Paris CIté, CRI, INSERM UMR 1149, Paris & Department of Pathology, FHU MOSAIC, AP-HP.Nord, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France (A.B.); and Department of Radiology, Sanya People's Hospital, Sanya, China (B.S.)
| | - Roberto Cannella
- From the Department of Radiology, Functional and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., Y.W., Y.Q., J.C., Y.C., W.C., B.S.); Université Paris Cité, UMR 1149, CRI, Paris & Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Beaujon, APHP.Nord, Clichy 92110, France (R.C., M.D.B., R.S., M.R.); Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy (R.C.); Laboratory of Pathology, Key Laboratory of Transplant Engineering and Immunology, NHC, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (Z.W., Y.S.); Université Paris CIté, CRI, INSERM UMR 1149, Paris & Department of Pathology, FHU MOSAIC, AP-HP.Nord, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France (A.B.); and Department of Radiology, Sanya People's Hospital, Sanya, China (B.S.)
| | - Zhenru Wu
- From the Department of Radiology, Functional and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., Y.W., Y.Q., J.C., Y.C., W.C., B.S.); Université Paris Cité, UMR 1149, CRI, Paris & Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Beaujon, APHP.Nord, Clichy 92110, France (R.C., M.D.B., R.S., M.R.); Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy (R.C.); Laboratory of Pathology, Key Laboratory of Transplant Engineering and Immunology, NHC, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (Z.W., Y.S.); Université Paris CIté, CRI, INSERM UMR 1149, Paris & Department of Pathology, FHU MOSAIC, AP-HP.Nord, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France (A.B.); and Department of Radiology, Sanya People's Hospital, Sanya, China (B.S.)
| | - Aurélie Beaufrère
- From the Department of Radiology, Functional and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., Y.W., Y.Q., J.C., Y.C., W.C., B.S.); Université Paris Cité, UMR 1149, CRI, Paris & Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Beaujon, APHP.Nord, Clichy 92110, France (R.C., M.D.B., R.S., M.R.); Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy (R.C.); Laboratory of Pathology, Key Laboratory of Transplant Engineering and Immunology, NHC, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (Z.W., Y.S.); Université Paris CIté, CRI, INSERM UMR 1149, Paris & Department of Pathology, FHU MOSAIC, AP-HP.Nord, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France (A.B.); and Department of Radiology, Sanya People's Hospital, Sanya, China (B.S.)
| | - Marco Dioguardi Burgio
- From the Department of Radiology, Functional and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., Y.W., Y.Q., J.C., Y.C., W.C., B.S.); Université Paris Cité, UMR 1149, CRI, Paris & Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Beaujon, APHP.Nord, Clichy 92110, France (R.C., M.D.B., R.S., M.R.); Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy (R.C.); Laboratory of Pathology, Key Laboratory of Transplant Engineering and Immunology, NHC, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (Z.W., Y.S.); Université Paris CIté, CRI, INSERM UMR 1149, Paris & Department of Pathology, FHU MOSAIC, AP-HP.Nord, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France (A.B.); and Department of Radiology, Sanya People's Hospital, Sanya, China (B.S.)
| | - Riccardo Sartoris
- From the Department of Radiology, Functional and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., Y.W., Y.Q., J.C., Y.C., W.C., B.S.); Université Paris Cité, UMR 1149, CRI, Paris & Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Beaujon, APHP.Nord, Clichy 92110, France (R.C., M.D.B., R.S., M.R.); Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy (R.C.); Laboratory of Pathology, Key Laboratory of Transplant Engineering and Immunology, NHC, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (Z.W., Y.S.); Université Paris CIté, CRI, INSERM UMR 1149, Paris & Department of Pathology, FHU MOSAIC, AP-HP.Nord, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France (A.B.); and Department of Radiology, Sanya People's Hospital, Sanya, China (B.S.)
| | - Yanshu Wang
- From the Department of Radiology, Functional and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., Y.W., Y.Q., J.C., Y.C., W.C., B.S.); Université Paris Cité, UMR 1149, CRI, Paris & Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Beaujon, APHP.Nord, Clichy 92110, France (R.C., M.D.B., R.S., M.R.); Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy (R.C.); Laboratory of Pathology, Key Laboratory of Transplant Engineering and Immunology, NHC, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (Z.W., Y.S.); Université Paris CIté, CRI, INSERM UMR 1149, Paris & Department of Pathology, FHU MOSAIC, AP-HP.Nord, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France (A.B.); and Department of Radiology, Sanya People's Hospital, Sanya, China (B.S.)
| | - Yun Qin
- From the Department of Radiology, Functional and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., Y.W., Y.Q., J.C., Y.C., W.C., B.S.); Université Paris Cité, UMR 1149, CRI, Paris & Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Beaujon, APHP.Nord, Clichy 92110, France (R.C., M.D.B., R.S., M.R.); Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy (R.C.); Laboratory of Pathology, Key Laboratory of Transplant Engineering and Immunology, NHC, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (Z.W., Y.S.); Université Paris CIté, CRI, INSERM UMR 1149, Paris & Department of Pathology, FHU MOSAIC, AP-HP.Nord, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France (A.B.); and Department of Radiology, Sanya People's Hospital, Sanya, China (B.S.)
| | - Jie Chen
- From the Department of Radiology, Functional and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., Y.W., Y.Q., J.C., Y.C., W.C., B.S.); Université Paris Cité, UMR 1149, CRI, Paris & Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Beaujon, APHP.Nord, Clichy 92110, France (R.C., M.D.B., R.S., M.R.); Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy (R.C.); Laboratory of Pathology, Key Laboratory of Transplant Engineering and Immunology, NHC, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (Z.W., Y.S.); Université Paris CIté, CRI, INSERM UMR 1149, Paris & Department of Pathology, FHU MOSAIC, AP-HP.Nord, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France (A.B.); and Department of Radiology, Sanya People's Hospital, Sanya, China (B.S.)
| | - Yidi Chen
- From the Department of Radiology, Functional and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., Y.W., Y.Q., J.C., Y.C., W.C., B.S.); Université Paris Cité, UMR 1149, CRI, Paris & Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Beaujon, APHP.Nord, Clichy 92110, France (R.C., M.D.B., R.S., M.R.); Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy (R.C.); Laboratory of Pathology, Key Laboratory of Transplant Engineering and Immunology, NHC, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (Z.W., Y.S.); Université Paris CIté, CRI, INSERM UMR 1149, Paris & Department of Pathology, FHU MOSAIC, AP-HP.Nord, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France (A.B.); and Department of Radiology, Sanya People's Hospital, Sanya, China (B.S.)
| | - Weixia Chen
- From the Department of Radiology, Functional and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., Y.W., Y.Q., J.C., Y.C., W.C., B.S.); Université Paris Cité, UMR 1149, CRI, Paris & Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Beaujon, APHP.Nord, Clichy 92110, France (R.C., M.D.B., R.S., M.R.); Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy (R.C.); Laboratory of Pathology, Key Laboratory of Transplant Engineering and Immunology, NHC, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (Z.W., Y.S.); Université Paris CIté, CRI, INSERM UMR 1149, Paris & Department of Pathology, FHU MOSAIC, AP-HP.Nord, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France (A.B.); and Department of Radiology, Sanya People's Hospital, Sanya, China (B.S.)
| | - Yujun Shi
- From the Department of Radiology, Functional and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., Y.W., Y.Q., J.C., Y.C., W.C., B.S.); Université Paris Cité, UMR 1149, CRI, Paris & Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Beaujon, APHP.Nord, Clichy 92110, France (R.C., M.D.B., R.S., M.R.); Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy (R.C.); Laboratory of Pathology, Key Laboratory of Transplant Engineering and Immunology, NHC, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (Z.W., Y.S.); Université Paris CIté, CRI, INSERM UMR 1149, Paris & Department of Pathology, FHU MOSAIC, AP-HP.Nord, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France (A.B.); and Department of Radiology, Sanya People's Hospital, Sanya, China (B.S.)
| | - Bin Song
- From the Department of Radiology, Functional and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., Y.W., Y.Q., J.C., Y.C., W.C., B.S.); Université Paris Cité, UMR 1149, CRI, Paris & Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Beaujon, APHP.Nord, Clichy 92110, France (R.C., M.D.B., R.S., M.R.); Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy (R.C.); Laboratory of Pathology, Key Laboratory of Transplant Engineering and Immunology, NHC, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (Z.W., Y.S.); Université Paris CIté, CRI, INSERM UMR 1149, Paris & Department of Pathology, FHU MOSAIC, AP-HP.Nord, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France (A.B.); and Department of Radiology, Sanya People's Hospital, Sanya, China (B.S.)
| | - Maxime Ronot
- From the Department of Radiology, Functional and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., Y.W., Y.Q., J.C., Y.C., W.C., B.S.); Université Paris Cité, UMR 1149, CRI, Paris & Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Beaujon, APHP.Nord, Clichy 92110, France (R.C., M.D.B., R.S., M.R.); Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy (R.C.); Laboratory of Pathology, Key Laboratory of Transplant Engineering and Immunology, NHC, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (Z.W., Y.S.); Université Paris CIté, CRI, INSERM UMR 1149, Paris & Department of Pathology, FHU MOSAIC, AP-HP.Nord, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France (A.B.); and Department of Radiology, Sanya People's Hospital, Sanya, China (B.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Xing F, Ma Q, Lu J, Zhu W, Du S, Jiang J, Zhang T, Xing W. Nodule-in-nodule architecture of hepatocellular carcinomas: enhancement patterns in the hepatobiliary phase and pathological features. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024; 49:3834-3846. [PMID: 38913136 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04259-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2024] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/25/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to evaluate the enhancement patterns in the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) and pathological features of nodule-in-nodule-type hepatocellular carcinoma (NIN-HCC) patients. METHODS In this single-institution retrospective study, 27 consecutive cirrhosis patients with 29 histologically confirmed NIN-HCCs who underwent preoperative examination via Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI were enrolled from January 2016 to September 2023. Two blinded radiologists assessed the imaging features of both the inner and outer nodules in NIN-HCCs to reach a consensus on the Liver Imaging Reporting & Data System (LI-RADS) categories of the lesions. Based on the different enhancement patterns of the inner and outer nodules in the HBP, NIN-HCCs were classified into different groups and further divided into different types. Imaging features and LI-RADS categories were subsequently compared among the groups. Pathological findings for NIN-HCCs were also evaluated. RESULTS Among 29 NIN-HCCs, all inner nodules showed hypervascularity, with a maximum diameter of 13.2 ± 5.5 mm; 51.7% (15/29) showed "wash-in with washout" enhancement; and 48.3% (14/29) showed "wash-in without washout" enhancement. All outer nodules showed hypovascularity, with a maximum diameter of 25.6 ± 7.3 mm, and 51.9% (14/29) showed a washout appearance on PVP. Among all the lesions, the maximum diameter was 27.5 ± 6.8 mm; 12 (41.4%) lesions were LR-4, and 17 (58.6%) lesions were LR-5. NIN-HCCs were classified into hypointense (62.1%, 18/29) and isointense (37.9%, 11/29) groups based on the signal intensity of the outer nodules in the HBP. In the hypointense group, 2 (6.9%) of the inner nodules were hypointense (type A), 11 (37.9%) were isointense (type B), and 5 (17.2%) were hyperintense (type C) compared to the background hypointense outer nodules. In the isointense group, 9 (31.0%) of the inner nodules were hypointense (type D), 2 (6.9%) were isointense (type E), and no (0%) was hyperintense (type F) compared to the background isointense outer nodules. There were no significant differences in the diameter, dynamic enhancement patterns of the inner or outer nodules, or LI-RADS scores of the lesions between the hypointense group and the isointense group (all P > 0.05). Histologically, the inner nodules of NIN-HCCs were mainly composed of moderately differentiated HCC (75.9% 22/29), whereas the outer nodules consisted of either well-differentiated HCC or high-grade dysplastic nodules (HGDNs). CONCLUSIONS NIN-HCCs exhibit specific MRI findings closely associated with their pathological features. The spectrum of HBP enhancement patterns provides valuable insights into the underlying cell biological mechanisms of these lesions. NIN-HCC subtypes may be used as a morphologic marker in the early stage of multistep hepatocarcinogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fei Xing
- Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University and Nantong Third People's Hospital, #99 Youth Middle Road, Chongchuan District, Nantong, 226000, Jiangsu, China
| | - Qinrong Ma
- Department of Pathology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University and Nantong Third People's Hospital, #99 Youth Middle Road, Chongchuan District, Nantong, 226000, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jiang Lu
- Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University and Nantong Third People's Hospital, #99 Youth Middle Road, Chongchuan District, Nantong, 226000, Jiangsu, China
| | - Wenjing Zhu
- Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University and Nantong Third People's Hospital, #99 Youth Middle Road, Chongchuan District, Nantong, 226000, Jiangsu, China
| | - Sheng Du
- Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University and Nantong Third People's Hospital, #99 Youth Middle Road, Chongchuan District, Nantong, 226000, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jifeng Jiang
- Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University and Nantong Third People's Hospital, #99 Youth Middle Road, Chongchuan District, Nantong, 226000, Jiangsu, China
| | - Tao Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University and Nantong Third People's Hospital, #99 Youth Middle Road, Chongchuan District, Nantong, 226000, Jiangsu, China.
| | - Wei Xing
- Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, No. 185 Juqian Street, Tianning District, Changzhou, 213000, Jiangsu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kazi IA, Jahagirdar V, Kabir BW, Syed AK, Kabir AW, Perisetti A. Role of Imaging in Screening for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:3400. [PMID: 39410020 PMCID: PMC11476228 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16193400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2024] [Revised: 09/22/2024] [Accepted: 09/26/2024] [Indexed: 10/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Primary liver cancer is among the most common cancers globally. It is the sixth-most common malignancy encountered and the third-most common cause of cancer-related death. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver malignancy, accounting for about 90% of primary liver cancers. The majority of HCCs occur in patients with underlying cirrhosis, which results from chronic liver diseases such as fatty liver, hepatitis B and hepatitis C infections, and chronic alcohol use, which are the leading causes. The obesity pandemic has led to an increased prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), which leads to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and could progress to cirrhosis. As HCC is among the most common cancers and occurs in the setting of chronic liver disease in most patients, screening the population at risk could help in early diagnosis and management, leading to improved survival. Screening for HCC is performed using biochemical marker testing such as α-fetoprotein (AFP) and cross-sectional imaging. It is critical to emphasize that HCC could potentially occur in patients without cirrhosis (non-cirrhotic HCC), which can account for almost 20% of all HCCs. The lack of cirrhosis can cause a delay in surveillance, which could potentially lead to diagnosis at a later stage, worsening the prognosis for such patients. In this article, we discuss the diagnosis of cirrhosis in at-risk populations with details on the different modalities available for screening HCC in patients with cirrhosis, emphasizing the role of abdominal ultrasounds, the primary imaging modality in HCC screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irfan A. Kazi
- Department of Radiology, University of Missouri Columbia, Columbia, MO 65212, USA;
| | - Vinay Jahagirdar
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA;
| | - Bareen W. Kabir
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri Columbia, Columbia, MO 65212, USA;
| | - Almaan K. Syed
- Blue Valley Southwest High School, Overland Park, KS 6622, USA;
| | | | - Abhilash Perisetti
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kansas City Veteran Affairs, Kansas City, MO 64128, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chen J, Sun W, Wang W, Fu C, Grimm R, Zeng M, Rao S. Diffusion-based virtual MR elastography for predicting recurrence of solitary hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy. Cancer Imaging 2024; 24:106. [PMID: 39138500 PMCID: PMC11320769 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-024-00759-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2024] [Accepted: 08/07/2024] [Indexed: 08/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To explore the capability of diffusion-based virtual MR elastography (vMRE) in the preoperative prediction of recurrence in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to investigate the underlying relevant histopathological characteristics. METHODS Between August 2015 and December 2016, patients underwent preoperative MRI examination with a dedicated DWI sequence (b-values: 200,1500 s/mm2) were recruited. The ADC values and diffusion-based virtual shear modulus (μdiff) of HCCs were calculated and MR morphological features were also analyzed. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify the risk factors associated with tumor recurrence. A preoperative radiologic model and postoperative model including pathological features were built to predict tumor recurrence after hepatectomy. RESULTS A total of 87 patients with solitary surgically confirmed HCCs were included in this study. Thirty-five patients (40.2%) were found to have tumor recurrence after hepatectomy. The preoperative model included higher μdiff and corona enhancement, while the postoperative model included higher μdiff, microvascular invasion, and histologic tumor grade. These factors were identified as significant prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival (RFS) (all p < 0.05). The HCC patients with μdiff values > 2.325 kPa showed poorer 5-year RFS after hepatectomy than patients with μdiff values ≤ 2.325 kPa (p < 0.001). Moreover, the higher μdiff values was correlated with the expression of CK19 (3.95 ± 2.37 vs. 3.15 ± 1.77, p = 0.017) and high Ki-67 labeling index (4.22 ± 1.63 vs. 2.72 ± 2.12, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The μdiff values related to the expression of CK19 and Ki-67 labeling index potentially predict RFS after hepatectomy in HCC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiejun Chen
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China
- Department of Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei Sun
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Wentao Wang
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China
- Department of Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Caixia Fu
- MR Application development, Siemens Shenzhen Magnetic Resonance Ltd, Shenzhen, China
| | - Robert Grimm
- MR Application Predevelopment, Siemens Healthineers AG, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Mengsu Zeng
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China
- Department of Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shengxiang Rao
- Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai, China.
- Department of Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chen L, Xu J, Liu D, Ji B, Wang J, Zeng X, Zhang J, Feng L. High-resolution free-breathing hepatobiliary phase MRI of the liver using XD-GRASP. Magn Reson Imaging 2024; 109:42-48. [PMID: 38447629 DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2024.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Revised: 02/25/2024] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the performance of high-resolution free-breathing (FB) hepatobiliary phase imaging of the liver using the eXtra-Dimension Golden-angle RAdial Sparse Parallel (XD-GRASP) MRI technique. METHODS Fifty-eight clinical patients (41 males, mean age = 52.9 ± 12.9) with liver lesions who underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with a liver-specific contrast agent were prospectively recruited for this study. Both breath-hold volumetric interpolated examination (BH-VIBE) imaging and FB imaging were performed during the hepatobiliary phase. FB images were acquired using a stack-of-stars golden-angle radial sequence and were reconstructed using the XD-GRASP method. Two experienced radiologists blinded to acquisition schemes independently scored the overall image quality, liver edge sharpness, hepatic vessel clarity, conspicuity of lesion, and overall artifact level of each image. The non-parametric paired two-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS Compared to BH-VIBE images, XD-GRASP images received significantly higher scores (P < 0.05) for the liver edge sharpness (4.83 ± 0.45 vs 4.29 ± 0.46), the hepatic vessel clarity (4.64 ± 0.67 vs 4.15 ± 0.56) and the conspicuity of lesion (4.75 ± 0.53 vs 4.31 ± 0.50). There were no significant differences (P > 0.05) between BH-VIBE and XD-GRASP images for the overall image quality (4.61 ± 0.50 vs 4.74 ± 0.47) and the overall artifact level (4.13 ± 0.44 vs 4.05 ± 0.61). CONCLUSION Compared to conventional BH-VIBE MRI, FB radial acquisition combined with XD-GRASP reconstruction facilitates higher spatial resolution imaging of the liver during the hepatobiliary phase. This enhancement can significantly improve the visualization and evaluation of the liver.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lihua Chen
- Department of Radiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, School of Medicine, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China
| | - Jian Xu
- Department of General Surgery, 904th Hospital, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China
| | - Daihong Liu
- Department of Radiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, School of Medicine, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China
| | - Bing Ji
- Department of Radiology, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China
| | - Jian Wang
- Department of Radiology, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China
| | - Xianchun Zeng
- Department of Radiology, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guizhou, China.
| | - Jiuquan Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, School of Medicine, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.
| | - Li Feng
- Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R) and Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wang L, Feng B, Liang M, Li D, Cong R, Chen Z, Wang S, Ma X, Zhao X. Prognostic performance of MRI LI-RADS version 2018 features and clinical-pathological factors in alpha-fetoprotein-negative hepatocellular carcinoma. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024; 49:1918-1928. [PMID: 38642093 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04278-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2023] [Revised: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the role of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2018 features and clinical-pathological factors for predicting the prognosis of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP)-negative (≤ 20 ng/ml) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, and to compare with other traditional staging systems. METHODS We retrospectively enrolled 169 patients with AFP-negative HCC who received preoperative MRI and hepatectomy between January 2015 and August 2020 (derivation dataset:validation dataset = 118:51). A prognostic model was constructed using the risk factors identified via Cox regression analysis. Predictive performance and discrimination capability were evaluated and compared with those of two traditional staging systems. RESULTS Six risk factors, namely the LI-RADS category, blood products in mass, microvascular invasion, tumor size, cirrhosis, and albumin-bilirubin grade, were associated with recurrence-free survival. The prognostic model constructed using these factors achieved C-index of 0.705 and 0.674 in the derivation and validation datasets, respectively. Furthermore, the model performed better in predicting patient prognosis than traditional staging systems. The model effectively stratified patients with AFP-negative HCC into high- and low-risk groups with significantly different outcomes (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION A prognostic model integrating the LI-RADS category, blood products in mass, microvascular invasion, tumor size, cirrhosis, and albumin-bilirubin grade may serve as a valuable tool for refining risk stratification in patients with AFP-negative HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leyao Wang
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Bing Feng
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Meng Liang
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Dengfeng Li
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Rong Cong
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Zhaowei Chen
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Sicong Wang
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging Research, General Electric Healthcare (China), Beijing, 100176, China
| | - Xiaohong Ma
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
| | - Xinming Zhao
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zhang J, Li Y, Xia J, Pan X, Lu L, Fu J, Jia N. Prediction of Microvascular Invasion and Recurrence After Curative Resection of LI-RADS Category 5 Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Gd-BOPTA Enhanced MRI. J Hepatocell Carcinoma 2024; 11:941-952. [PMID: 38813100 PMCID: PMC11135558 DOI: 10.2147/jhc.s459686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 05/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective This study aims to investigate the predictive value of Gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) enhanced MRI features on microvascular invasion (MVI) and recurrence in patients with Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) category 5 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods A total of 132 patients with LI-RADS category 5 HCC who underwent curative resection and Gd-BOPTA enhanced MRI at our hospital between January 2016 and December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Qualitative evaluation based on LI-RADS v2018 imaging features was performed. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the predictive significance of these features for MVI, and the Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify postoperative risk factors of recurrence. The recurrence-free survival (RFS) was analyzed by using the Kaplan-Meier curve and Log rank test. Results Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified that corona enhancement (odds ratio [OR] = 3.217; p < 0.001), internal arteries (OR = 4.147; p = 0.004), and peritumoral hypointensity on hepatobiliary phase (HBP) (OR = 5.165; p < 0.001) were significantly associated with MVI. Among the 132 patients with LR-5 HCC, 62 patients experienced postoperative recurrence. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that mosaic architecture (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.982; p = 0.014), corona enhancement (HR = 1.783; p = 0.039), and peritumoral hypointensity on HBP (HR = 2.130; p = 0.009) were risk factors for poor RFS. Conclusion MRI features based on Gd-BOPTA can be noninvasively and effectively predict MVI and recurrence of LR-5 HCC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Third Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yinqiao Li
- Department of Radiology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Third Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
- School of Health Science and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
| | - Jinju Xia
- Department of Radiology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Third Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xingpeng Pan
- Department of Radiology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Third Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lun Lu
- Department of Radiology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Third Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiazhao Fu
- Department of Organ Transplantation, Changhai Hospital, First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ningyang Jia
- Department of Radiology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Third Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Liu Y, Zhang Z, Zhang H, Wang X, Wang K, Yang R, Han P, Luan K, Zhou Y. Clinical prediction of microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma using an MRI-based graph convolutional network model integrated with nomogram. Br J Radiol 2024; 97:938-946. [PMID: 38552308 PMCID: PMC11075980 DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqae056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Revised: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 05/09/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Based on enhanced MRI, a prediction model of microvascular invasion (MVI) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was developed using graph convolutional network (GCN) combined nomogram. METHODS We retrospectively collected 182 HCC patients confirmed histopathologically, all of them performed enhanced MRI before surgery. The patients were randomly divided into training and validation groups. Radiomics features were extracted from the arterial phase (AP), portal venous phase (PVP), and delayed phase (DP), respectively. After removing redundant features, the graph structure by constructing the distance matrix with the feature matrix was built. Screening the superior phases and acquired GCN Score (GS). Finally, combining clinical, radiological and GS established the predicting nomogram. RESULTS 27.5% (50/182) patients were with MVI positive. In radiological analysis, intratumoural artery (P = 0.007) was an independent predictor of MVI. GCN model with grey-level cooccurrence matrix-grey-level run length matrix features exhibited area under the curves of the training group was 0.532, 0.690, and 0.885 and the validation group was 0.583, 0.580, and 0.854 for AP, PVP, and DP, respectively. DP was selected to develop final model and got GS. Combining GS with diameter, corona enhancement, mosaic architecture, and intratumoural artery constructed a nomogram which showed a C-index of 0.884 (95% CI: 0.829-0.927). CONCLUSIONS The GCN model based on DP has a high predictive ability. A nomogram combining GS, clinical and radiological characteristics can be a simple and effective guiding tool for selecting HCC treatment options. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE GCN based on MRI could predict MVI on HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Liu
- Department of Radiology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin 150010, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Ziqian Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin 150010, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Hongxia Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin 150010, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Xinxin Wang
- Department of Radiology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin 150010, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Kun Wang
- College of Intelligent Systems Science and Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China
| | - Rui Yang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, No.150 Haping Road, Nangang District, Harbin 150081, Heilongjiang Province, China
| | - Peng Han
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, No.150 Haping Road, Nangang District, Harbin 150081, Heilongjiang Province, China
| | - Kuan Luan
- College of Intelligent Systems Science and Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China
| | - Yang Zhou
- Department of Radiology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin 150010, Heilongjiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Jiang H, Qin Y, Wei H, Zheng T, Yang T, Wu Y, Ding C, Chernyak V, Ronot M, Fowler KJ, Chen W, Bashir MR, Song B. Prognostic MRI features to predict postresection survivals for very early to intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur Radiol 2024; 34:3163-3182. [PMID: 37870624 PMCID: PMC11126450 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10279-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2023] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Contrast-enhanced MRI can provide individualized prognostic information for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to investigate the value of MRI features to predict early (≤ 2 years)/late (> 2 years) recurrence-free survival (E-RFS and L-RFS, respectively) and overall survival (OS). MATERIALS AND METHODS Consecutive adult patients at a tertiary academic center who received curative-intent liver resection for very early to intermediate stage HCC and underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced MRI were retrospectively enrolled from March 2011 to April 2021. Three masked radiologists independently assessed 54 MRI features. Uni- and multivariable Cox regression analyses were conducted to investigate the associations of imaging features with E-RFS, L-RFS, and OS. RESULTS This study included 600 patients (median age, 53 years; 526 men). During a median follow-up of 55.3 months, 51% of patients experienced recurrence (early recurrence: 66%; late recurrence: 34%), and 17% died. Tumor size, multiple tumors, rim arterial phase hyperenhancement, iron sparing in solid mass, tumor growth pattern, and gastroesophageal varices were associated with E-RFS and OS (largest p = .02). Nonperipheral washout (p = .006), markedly low apparent diffusion coefficient value (p = .02), intratumoral arteries (p = .01), and width of the main portal vein (p = .03) were associated with E-RFS but not with L-RFS or OS, while the VICT2 trait was specifically associated with OS (p = .02). Multiple tumors (p = .048) and radiologically-evident cirrhosis (p < .001) were the only predictors for L-RFS. CONCLUSION Twelve visually-assessed MRI features predicted postoperative E-RFS (≤ 2 years), L-RFS (> 2 years), and OS for very early to intermediate-stage HCCs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT The prognostic MRI features may help inform personalized surgical planning, neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapies, and postoperative surveillance, thus may be included in future prognostic models. KEY POINTS • Tumor size, multiple tumors, rim arterial phase hyperenhancement, iron sparing, tumor growth pattern, and gastroesophageal varices predicted both recurrence-free survival within 2 years and overall survival. • Nonperipheral washout, markedly low apparent diffusion coefficient value, intratumoral arteries, and width of the main portal vein specifically predicted recurrence-free survival within 2 years, while the VICT2 trait specifically predicted overall survival. • Multiple tumors and radiologically-evident cirrhosis were the only predictors for recurrence-free survival beyond 2 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanyu Jiang
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Yun Qin
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Hong Wei
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Tianying Zheng
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Ting Yang
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Yuanan Wu
- Department of Technology, JD.Com, Inc, Beijing, China
| | - Chengyu Ding
- Department of Technology, ShuKun (BeiJing) Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China
| | - Victoria Chernyak
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Maxime Ronot
- Université Paris Cité, UMR 1149, CRI, Paris & Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Beaujon, APHP.Nord, Clichy, France
| | - Kathryn J Fowler
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Weixia Chen
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
| | - Mustafa R Bashir
- Department of Radiology, Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, and Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
| | - Bin Song
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
- Department of Radiology, Sanya People's Hospital, Sanya, 572000, Hainan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ding F, Huang M, Ren P, Zhang J, Lin Z, Sun Y, Liang C, Zhao X. Quantitative information from gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI can predict proliferative subtype of solitary hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study. Eur Radiol 2024; 34:2445-2456. [PMID: 37691080 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10227-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Revised: 06/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the value of quantitative parameters derived from gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for predicting molecular subtype of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and overall survival. METHODS This multicenter retrospective study included 218 solitary HCC patients who underwent gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI. All HCC lesions were resected and pathologically confirmed. The lesion-to-liver contrast enhancement ratio (LLCER) and lesion-to-liver contrast (LLC) were measured in the hepatobiliary phase. Potential risk factors for proliferative HCC were assessed by logistic regression. The ability of LLCER and LLC to predict proliferative HCC was assessed by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Prognostic factors were evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards regression model for survival outcomes. RESULTS LLCER was an independent predictor of proliferative HCC (odds ratio, 0.015; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.008-0.022; p < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve was 0.812 (95% CI, 0.748-0.877), higher than that of LLC, alpha-fetoprotein > 100 ng/ml, satellite nodules, and rim arterial phase hyperenhancement (all p ≤ 0.001). HCC patients with LLCER < -4.59% had a significantly higher incidence of proliferative HCC than those with the LLCER ≥ -4.59%. During the follow-up period, LLCER was an independent predictor of overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.070; 95% CI, 0.015-0.324; p = 0.001) in HCC patients. CONCLUSIONS Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced quantitative parameter in the hepatobiliary phase can predict the proliferative subtype of solitary HCC with a moderately high accuracy. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT Quantitative information from gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI can provide crucial information on hepatocellular carcinoma subtypes. It might be valuable to design novel therapeutic strategies, such as targeted therapies or immunotherapy. KEY POINTS • The lesion-to-liver contrast enhancement ratio (LLCER) is an independent predictor of proliferative hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). • The ability of LLCER to predict proliferative HCC outperformed lesion-to-liver contrast, alpha-fetoprotein > 100 ng/ml, satellite nodules, and rim arterial phase hyperenhancement. • HCC patients with LLCER < -4.59% had a significantly higher incidence of proliferative HCC than those with the LLCER ≥ -4.59%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feier Ding
- Department of Radiology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, 250021, Shandong Province, China
| | - Min Huang
- Department of Radiology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, 250021, Shandong Province, China
| | - Ping Ren
- Department of Radiology, Central Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, 250021, Shandong Province, China
| | - Junlei Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, 250021, Shandong Province, China
| | - Zhengyu Lin
- Department of Interventional Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, Fujian Province, China
| | - Yan Sun
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, 250021, Shandong Province, China
| | - Changhu Liang
- Department of Radiology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, 250021, Shandong Province, China.
| | - Xinya Zhao
- Department of Radiology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, 250021, Shandong Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zhang ZX, Xv H, Du YN, Lv ZB, Yang ZH. Optimizing LI-RADS: ancillary features screened from LR-3/4 categories can improve the diagnosis of HCC on MRI. BMC Gastroenterol 2024; 24:117. [PMID: 38515017 PMCID: PMC10956370 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-024-03201-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the high-efficiency ancillary features (AFs) screened from LR-3/4 lesions and the HCC/non-HCC group and the diagnostic performance of LR3/4 observations. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed a total of 460 patients (with 473 nodules) classified into LR-3-LR-5 categories, including 311 cases of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), 6 cases of non-HCC malignant tumors, and 156 cases of benign lesions. Two faculty abdominal radiologists with experience in hepatic imaging reviewed and recorded the major features (MFs) and AFs of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS). The frequency of the features and diagnostic performance were calculated with a logistic regression model. After applying the above AFs to LR-3/LR-4 observations, the sensitivity and specificity for HCC were compared. RESULTS The average age of all patients was 54.24 ± 11.32 years, and the biochemical indicators ALT (P = 0.044), TBIL (P = 0.000), PLT (P = 0.004), AFP (P = 0.000) and Child‒Pugh class were significantly higher in the HCC group. MFs, mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity, restricted diffusion and AFs favoring HCC in addition to nodule-in-nodule appearance were common in the HCC group and LR-5 category. AFs screened from the HCC/non-HCC group (AF-HCC) were mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity, restricted diffusion, TP hypointensity, marked T2 hyperintensity and HBP isointensity (P = 0.005, < 0.001, = 0. 032, p < 0.001, = 0.013), and the AFs screened from LR-3/4 lesions (AF-LR) were restricted diffusion, mosaic architecture, fat in mass, marked T2 hyperintensity and HBP isointensity (P < 0.001, = 0.020, = 0.036, < 0.001, = 0.016), which were not exactly the same. After applying AF-HCC and AF-LR to LR-3 and LR-4 observations in HCC group and Non-HCC group, After the above grades changed, the diagnostic sensitivity for HCC were 84.96% using AF-HCC and 85.71% using AF-LR, the specificity were 89.26% using AF-HCC and 90.60% using AF-LR, which made a significant difference (P = 0.000). And the kappa value for the two methods of AF-HCC and AF-LR were 0.695, reaching a substantial agreement. CONCLUSION When adjusting for LR-3/LR-4 lesions, the screened AFs with high diagnostic ability can be used to optimize LI-RADS v2018; among them, AF-LR is recommended for better diagnostic capabilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zi-Xin Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Hui Xv
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yan-Ni Du
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhi-Bin Lv
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Zheng-Han Yang
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hu W, Lyu R, Wang D, Gao Z, Sun C, Jia K. Liver imaging reporting and data system diagnostic performance in hepatocellular carcinoma when modifying the definition of "washout" on gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Arab J Gastroenterol 2024; 25:58-63. [PMID: 38245474 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajg.2023.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Revised: 08/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/31/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS The sensitivity of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (EOB-MRI) was suboptimal. This study evaluated the LI-RADS diagnostic performance in HCC when modifying the definition of washout using the transition phase (TP) or hepatobiliary phase (HBP) hypointensity on EOB-MRI. PATIENTS AND METHODS This retrospective study included patients at high risk of HCC who underwent EOB-MRI from June 2016 to June 2021. Three modified LI-RADS (mLI-RADS) algorithms were formulated according to different definitions of washout as follows: (a) portal venous phase (PVP) or TP hypointensity, (b) PVP or HBP hypointensity, and (c) PVP or TP or HBP hypointensity. Diagnostic performance, including sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, was compared between mLI-RADS and LI-RADS v2018 using McNemar's test. RESULTS A total of 379 patients with 426 pathologically confirmed hepatic observations (250 HCCs, 88 nonHCC malignancies, and 88 benign lesions) were included in our study. The sensitivity rates of mLI-RADS a-c (80.0 %, 80.8 %, and 80.8 %) were all higher than that of LI-RADS v2018 (74.4 %) (all p < 0.05). The specificity rates of mLI-RADS a-c (86.9 %, 85.8 %, and 85.8 %) were all slightly lower than that of LI-RADS v2018 (88.6 %), although no statistically significant difference was noted (all p > 0.05). The accuracies of the three mLI-RADS algorithms were the same and were all higher than that of LI-RADS v2018 (82.9 % vs. 80.3 %, all p < 0.05). CONCLUSION When the definition of washout appearance was extended to TP or HBP hypointensity on EOB-MRI, the diagnostic sensitivity of LI-RADS for HCC improved without decreasing specificity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weijuan Hu
- Department of Radiology, The Third Central Hospital of Tianjin, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Extracorporeal Life Support for Critical Diseases, Artificial Cell Engineering Technology Research Center, Tianjin Institute of Hepatobiliary Disease, No. 83 Jintang Road, Hedong District, Tianjin 300170, China
| | - Rong Lyu
- Department of Radiology, The Third Central Hospital of Tianjin, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Extracorporeal Life Support for Critical Diseases, Artificial Cell Engineering Technology Research Center, Tianjin Institute of Hepatobiliary Disease, No. 83 Jintang Road, Hedong District, Tianjin 300170, China.
| | - Di Wang
- Department of Radiology, The Third Central Hospital of Tianjin, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Extracorporeal Life Support for Critical Diseases, Artificial Cell Engineering Technology Research Center, Tianjin Institute of Hepatobiliary Disease, No. 83 Jintang Road, Hedong District, Tianjin 300170, China
| | - Zhongsong Gao
- Department of Radiology, The Third Central Hospital of Tianjin, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Extracorporeal Life Support for Critical Diseases, Artificial Cell Engineering Technology Research Center, Tianjin Institute of Hepatobiliary Disease, No. 83 Jintang Road, Hedong District, Tianjin 300170, China
| | - Cheng Sun
- Department of Radiology, The Third Central Hospital of Tianjin, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Extracorporeal Life Support for Critical Diseases, Artificial Cell Engineering Technology Research Center, Tianjin Institute of Hepatobiliary Disease, No. 83 Jintang Road, Hedong District, Tianjin 300170, China
| | - Kefeng Jia
- Department of Radiology, The Third Central Hospital of Tianjin, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Extracorporeal Life Support for Critical Diseases, Artificial Cell Engineering Technology Research Center, Tianjin Institute of Hepatobiliary Disease, No. 83 Jintang Road, Hedong District, Tianjin 300170, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Suhail Najm Alareer H, Arian A, Fotouhi M, Taher HJ, Dinar Abdullah A. Evidence Supporting Diagnostic Value of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System for CT- and MR Imaging-based Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Biomed Phys Eng 2024; 14:5-20. [PMID: 38357604 PMCID: PMC10862115 DOI: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2211-1562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2024]
Abstract
Background Based on the Liver Imaging Data and Reporting System (LI-RADS) guidelines, Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) can be diagnosed using imaging criteria in patients at risk of HCC. Objective This study aimed to assess the diagnostic value of LI-RADS in high-risk patients with HCC. Material and Methods This systematic review is conducted on international databases, including Google Scholar, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, PROQUEST, and Cochrane Library, with appropriate keywords. Using the binomial distribution formula, the variance of each study was calculated, and all the data were analyzed using STATA version 16. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were determined using a random-effects meta-analysis approach. Also, we used the chi-squared test and I2 index to calculate heterogeneity among studies, and Funnel plots and Egger tests were used for evaluating publication bias. Results The pooled sensitivity was estimated at 0.80 (95% CI 0.76-0.84). According to different types of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (LI-RADS), the highest pooled sensitivity was in version 2018 (0.83 (95% CI 0.79-0.87) (I2: 80.6%, P of chi 2 test for heterogeneity <0.001 and T2: 0.001). The pooled specificity was estimated as 0.89 (95% CI 0.87-0.92). According to different types of LI-RADS, the highest pooled specificity was in version 2014 (93.0 (95% CI 89.0-96.0) (I2: 81.7%, P of chi 2 test for heterogeneity <0.001 and T2: 0.001). Conclusion LI-RADS can assist radiologists in achieving the required sensitivity and specificity in high-risk patients suspected to have HCC. Therefore, this strategy can serve as an appropriate tool for identifying HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hayder Suhail Najm Alareer
- Department of Radiology, College of Health and Medical Technology, Al-Ayen University, Thi-Qar, 64001, Iraq
| | - Arvin Arian
- Cancer Institute ADIR, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran
| | - Maryam Fotouhi
- Quantitative MR Imaging and Spectroscopy Group (QMISG), Research Centre for Molecular and Cellular Imaging (RCMCI), Advanced Medical Technologies and Equipment Institute (AMTEI), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Ayoob Dinar Abdullah
- Department of Radiology Technology, Al-Manara College for Medical Sciences, Missan, Iraq
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Dawit H, Lam E, McInnes MDF, van der Pol CB, Bashir MR, Salameh JP, Levis B, Sirlin CB, Chernyak V, Choi SH, Kim SY, Fraum TJ, Tang A, Jiang H, Song B, Wang J, Wilson SR, Kwon H, Kierans AS, Joo I, Ronot M, Song JS, Podgórska J, Rosiak G, Kang Z, Allen BC, Costa AF. LI-RADS CT and MRI Ancillary Feature Association with Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Malignancy: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis. Radiology 2024; 310:e231501. [PMID: 38376399 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.231501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/21/2024]
Abstract
Background The independent contribution of each Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) CT or MRI ancillary feature (AF) has not been established. Purpose To evaluate the association of LI-RADS AFs with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and malignancy while adjusting for LI-RADS major features through an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis. Materials and Methods Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus were searched from January 2014 to January 2022 for studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of CT and MRI for HCC using LI-RADS version 2014, 2017, or 2018. Using a one-step approach, IPD across studies were pooled. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were derived from multivariable logistic regression models of each AF combined with major features except threshold growth (excluded because of infrequent reporting). Liver observation clustering was addressed at the study and participant levels through random intercepts. Risk of bias was assessed using a composite reference standard and Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2. Results Twenty studies comprising 3091 observations (2456 adult participants; mean age, 59 years ± 11 [SD]; 1849 [75.3%] men) were included. In total, 89% (eight of nine) of AFs favoring malignancy were associated with malignancy and/or HCC, 80% (four of five) of AFs favoring HCC were associated with HCC, and 57% (four of seven) of AFs favoring benignity were negatively associated with HCC and/or malignancy. Nonenhancing capsule (OR = 3.50 [95% CI: 1.53, 8.01]) had the strongest association with HCC. Diffusion restriction (OR = 14.45 [95% CI: 9.82, 21.27]) and mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity (OR = 10.18 [95% CI: 7.17, 14.44]) had the strongest association with malignancy. The strongest negative associations with HCC were parallels blood pool enhancement (OR = 0.07 [95% CI: 0.01, 0.49]) and marked T2 hyperintensity (OR = 0.18 [95% CI: 0.07, 0.45]). Seventeen studies (85%) had a high risk of bias. Conclusion Most LI-RADS AFs were independently associated with HCC, malignancy, or benignity as intended when adjusting for major features. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Crivellaro in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haben Dawit
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Eric Lam
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Matthew D F McInnes
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Christian B van der Pol
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Mustafa R Bashir
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Jean-Paul Salameh
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Brooke Levis
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Claude B Sirlin
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Victoria Chernyak
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Sang Hyun Choi
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - So Yeon Kim
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Tyler J Fraum
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - An Tang
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Hanyu Jiang
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Bin Song
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Jin Wang
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Stephanie R Wilson
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Heejin Kwon
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Andrea S Kierans
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Ijin Joo
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Maxime Ronot
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Ji Soo Song
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Joanna Podgórska
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Grzegorz Rosiak
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Zhen Kang
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Brian C Allen
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| | - Andreu F Costa
- From the Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.D.); Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (H.D., M.D.F.M., J.P.S.); Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (E.L.); Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (M.D.F.M.); Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.B.v.d.P.); Department of Radiology (M.R.B., B.C.A.) and Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance Development (M.R.B.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (J.P.S.); Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (B.L.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California-San Diego, San Diego, Calif (C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (V.C.); Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (S.H.C., S.Y.K.); Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (T.J.F.); Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (H.J., B.S.); Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China (J.W.); University of Calgary Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of Radiology, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea (H.K.); Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY (A.S.K.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea (I.J.); Department of Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Nord, Université Paris Cité, CRI UMR 1149, Paris, France (M.R.); Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea (J.S.S.); Second Radiology Department, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland (J.P., G.R.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (Z.K.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Victoria General Building, 3rd Fl, 1276 S Park St, Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 2Y9 (A.F.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Li S, Deng K, Qiu J, Wang P, Yin D, Xie Y, Yu Y. Based on Gadolinium Ethoxybenzyl DTPA-Enhanced MRI: Diagnostic Performance of the Category-Modified LR-5 Criteria in Patients At Risk for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2024; 23:15330338241256859. [PMID: 38780516 PMCID: PMC11131403 DOI: 10.1177/15330338241256859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Revised: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction: We aimed to modify the LR-5 strategy to improve the diagnostic sensitivity for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in high-risk patients while maintaining specificity. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 412 patients with 445 liver observations who underwent preoperative gadolinium ethoxybenzyl DTPA (GD-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced MRI followed by surgical procedures or biopsies. All observations were classified according to LI-RADS v2018, and the classifications were adjusted by modifying major features (MF)(substituting threshold growth with a more HCC-specific ancillary features (AF): presence of blood products within the mass, arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) was interpreted with hypointensity on precontrast imaging- isointensity in arterial phase (AP) and extending washout to transitional phase (TP)(2 min)). The specificity, sensitivity, and positive predictive value (PPV) were assessed to compare LR-5 (definitely HCC) diagnostic efficacy between LI-RADS version 2018 and modified LI-RADS. Results: Apart from nonenhancing "capsule", the interreader agreement of MFs and HCC-specific AFs between the two readers reached substantial or excellent ranges (κ values ranging from 0.631 to 0.911). According to LI-5 v2018, the specificity, sensitivity and PPV of HCC were 90.74%, 82.35%, and 98.17%, respectively. Based on a more HCC-specific AF, signal intensity in AP and TP (2 min), the sensitivity of the three modified strategies were 86.19%, 93.09%, 96.67% (P < .05)), while maintaining high specificity and PPV rates at 88.89% and 98.25% (P > .05) Conclusion: Further investigation into the efficacy of threshold growth as a MF is warranted. By utilizing GD-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI, enhancing the sensitivity of the modified LR-5 category may be achieved without compromising specificity and PPV in diagnosing HCC among high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaopeng Li
- Departmentof Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China
- Departmentof Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China(Southern District of Anhui Provincial Hospital), Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Kexue Deng
- Departmentof Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China(Southern District of Anhui Provincial Hospital), Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Jun Qiu
- Departmentof Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China(Southern District of Anhui Provincial Hospital), Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Peng Wang
- Departmentof Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China(Southern District of Anhui Provincial Hospital), Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Dawei Yin
- Departmentof Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China(Southern District of Anhui Provincial Hospital), Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Yiju Xie
- Departmentof Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China(Southern District of Anhui Provincial Hospital), Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Yongqiang Yu
- Departmentof Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Wei H, Fu F, Jiang H, Wu Y, Qin Y, Wei H, Yang T, Wang M, Song B. Development and validation of the OSASH score to predict overall survival of hepatocellular carcinoma after surgical resection: a dual-institutional study. Eur Radiol 2023; 33:7631-7645. [PMID: 37191923 PMCID: PMC10598081 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09725-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Revised: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop and validate a risk score based on preoperative clinical-radiological parameters for predicting overall survival (OS) in patients undergoing surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS From July 2010 to December 2021, consecutive patients with surgically-proven HCC who underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced MRI were retrospectively enrolled. A preoperative OS risk score was constructed in the training cohort using a Cox regression model and validated in a propensity score-matched internal validation cohort and an external validation cohort. RESULTS A total of 520 patients were enrolled, among whom 210, 210, and 100 patients were from the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts, respectively. Independent predictors for OS included incomplete tumor "capsule," mosaic architecture, tumor multiplicity, and serum alpha-fetoprotein, which were incorporated into the "OSASH score." The C-index the OSASH score was 0.85, 0.81, and 0.62 in the training, internal, and external validation cohorts, respectively. Using 32 as the cutoff point, the OSASH score stratified patients into prognostically distinct low- and high-risk groups among all study cohorts and six subgroups (all p < 0.05). Furthermore, patients with BCLC stage B-C HCC and OSASH-low risk achieved comparable OS to that of patients with BCLC stage 0-A HCC and OSASH-high risk in the internal validation cohort (5-year OS rates, 74.7 vs. 77.8%; p = 0.964). CONCLUSION The OSASH score may help predict OS in HCC patients undergoing hepatectomy and identify potential surgical candidates among those with BCLC stage B-C HCC. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT By incorporating three preoperative MRI features and serum AFP, the OSASH score may help predict postsurgical overall survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and identify potential surgical candidates among those with BCLC stage B and C HCC. KEY POINTS • The OSASH score incorporating three MRI features and serum AFP can be used to predict OS in HCC patients who received curative-intent hepatectomy. • The score stratified patients into prognostically distinct low- and high-risk strata in all study cohorts and six subgroups. • Among patients with BCLC stage B and C HCC, the score identified a subgroup of low-risk patients who achieved favorable outcomes after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Wei
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, GUOXUE Alley, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Fangfang Fu
- Department of Medical Imaging, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, No. 7, WEIWU Road, Zhengzhou, 450003, Henan, China
- Department of Medical Imaging, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| | - Hanyu Jiang
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, GUOXUE Alley, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Yuanan Wu
- Big Data Research Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Yun Qin
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, GUOXUE Alley, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Huanhuan Wei
- Academy of Medical Sciences, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| | - Ting Yang
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, GUOXUE Alley, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Meiyun Wang
- Department of Medical Imaging, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, No. 7, WEIWU Road, Zhengzhou, 450003, Henan, China.
- Department of Medical Imaging, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
| | - Bin Song
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, GUOXUE Alley, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
- Department of Radiology, Sanya People's Hospital, Sanya, Hainan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Jang HJ, Choi SH, Choi SJ, Choi WM, Byun JH, Won HJ, Shin YM. LI-RADS version 2018 for hepatocellular carcinoma < 1.0 cm on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 2023; 33:5792-5800. [PMID: 37017700 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09554-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2022] [Revised: 02/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We aimed to develop and evaluate a modified Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2018 using significant ancillary features for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) < 1.0 cm on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS Patients who underwent preoperative gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI for focal solid nodules < 2.0 cm within 1 month of MRI between January 2016 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Major and ancillary features were compared between HCCs of < 1.0 cm and 1.0-1.9 cm using the chi-square test. Significant ancillary features associated with HCC < 1.0 cm were determined by univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis. The sensitivity and specificity of LR-5 were compared between LI-RADS v2018 and our modified LI-RADS (applying the significant ancillary feature) using generalized estimating equations. RESULTS Of 796 included nodules, 248 were < 1.0 cm and 548 were 1.0-1.9 cm. HCC < 1.0 cm less frequently showed an enhancing capsule (7.1% vs. 31.1%, p < .001) and threshold growth (0% vs. 8.3%, p = .007) than HCC of 1.0-1.9 cm. Restricted diffusion was the only ancillary feature significant for diagnosing HCC < 1.0 cm (adjusted odds ratio = 11.50, p < .001). In the diagnosis of HCC, our modified LI-RADS using restricted diffusion had significantly higher sensitivity than LI-RADS v2018 (61.8% vs. 53.5%, p < .001), with similar specificity (97.3% vs. 97.8%, p = .157). CONCLUSION Restricted diffusion was the only significant independent ancillary feature for diagnosing HCC < 1.0 cm. Our modified LI-RADS using restricted diffusion can improve the sensitivity for HCC < 1.0 cm. KEY POINTS • The imaging features of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) < 1.0 cm differed from those of HCC of 1.0-1.9 cm. • Restricted diffusion was the only significant independent ancillary feature for HCC < 1.0 cm. • Modified Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) with the addition of restricted diffusion can improve the sensitivity for HCC < 1.0 cm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyeon Ji Jang
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang Hyun Choi
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
| | - Se Jin Choi
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Won-Mook Choi
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Ho Byun
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyung Jin Won
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Yong Moon Shin
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Pan J, Song M, Yang L, Zhao Y, Zhu Y, Wang M, Chen F. The role of enhancing capsule and modified capsule appearances in LI-RADS for diagnosing HCC ≤ 3.0 cm on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI. Eur Radiol 2023; 33:5801-5811. [PMID: 36894754 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09487-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2022] [Revised: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the value of using enhancing capsule (EC) or modified capsule appearance as a major feature in LI-RADS for diagnosing HCC ≤ 3.0 cm on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI (Gd-EOB-MRI), and to explore the relationship between the imaging features and the histological fibrous capsule. METHODS This retrospective study enrolled 342 hepatic lesions ≤ 3.0 cm in 319 patients that underwent Gd-EOB-MRIs from January 2018 to March 2021. During dynamic phases and hepatobiliary phase, the modified capsule appearance added the nonenhancing capsule (NEC) (modified LI-RADS + NEC) or corona enhancement (CoE) (modified LI-RADS + CoE) to EC as an alternative capsule appearance. Inter-reader agreement of imaging features was assessed. The diagnostic performances of LI-RADS, LI-RADS with EC ignored, and two modified LI-RADS were compared, followed by Bonferroni correction. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify the independent features associated with the histological fibrous capsule. RESULTS The inter-reader agreement on EC (0.64) was lower than that on the NEC alternative (0.71) but better than that on CoE alternative (0.58). For HCC diagnosis, compared to LI-RADS, LI-RADS with EC ignored showed significantly lower sensitivity (72.7% vs. 67.4%, p < 0.001) with comparable specificity (89.3% vs. 90.7%, p = 1.000). Two modified LI-RADS showed slightly higher sensitivity and lower specificity than LI-RADS, without statistical significance (all p ≥ 0.006). The AUC was highest with modified LI-RADS + NEC (0.82). Both EC and NEC were significantly associated with the fibrous capsule (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION EC appearance improved the diagnostic sensitivity of LI-RADS for HCC ≤ 3.0 cm on Gd-EOB-MRI. Considering NEC as an alternative capsule appearance allowed for better inter-reader reliability and comparable diagnostic ability. KEY POINTS • Using the enhancing capsule as a major feature in LI-RADS significantly improved the sensitivity of diagnosing HCC ≤ 3.0 cm without reducing specificity on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI. • Compared to the corona enhancement, the nonenhancing capsule might be a preferable alternative capsule appearance for diagnosing HCC ≤ 3.0 cm. • Capsule appearance should be considered a major feature in LI-RADS for diagnosing HCC ≤ 3.0 cm, regardless whether the capsule appears to be enhancing or nonenhancing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junhan Pan
- Department of Radiology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine First Affiliated Hospital, No.79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Mengchen Song
- Department of Radiology, Shulan (Hangzhou) Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Shuren University Shulan International Medical College, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Lili Yang
- Department of Radiology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine First Affiliated Hospital, No.79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Yanci Zhao
- Department of Radiology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine First Affiliated Hospital, No.79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Yanyan Zhu
- Department of Radiology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine First Affiliated Hospital, No.79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Meng Wang
- Department of Pathology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine First Affiliated Hospital, No.79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China
| | - Feng Chen
- Department of Radiology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine First Affiliated Hospital, No.79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lee JH, Kim YK, Min JH, Cha D, Hwang JA, Ahn S. Comparison of noncontrast, dynamic, and hepatobiliary phase abbreviated MRI protocols for detection of hepatic malignancies. Clin Imaging 2023; 101:206-214. [PMID: 37421716 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2023.05.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2023] [Revised: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 07/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Abbreviated MRI for surveillance in patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has recently gained interest. PURPOSE To compare the performance among the three types of abbreviated MRI protocols for the detection of hepatic malignancies in patients at risk for HCC. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective review using data from a prospective-registry study included 221 patients with one or more hepatic nodules detected during surveillance for chronic liver disease. Patients underwent MRI with extracellular contrast agents (ECA-MRI) and MRI with hepatobiliary agents (HBA-MRI) before surgery. Sequences from each MRI were extracted to create three simulated abbreviated MRI (aMRI) sets: noncontrast aMRI (NC-aMRI), dynamic aMRI (Dyn-aMRI), and hepatobiliary phase aMRI (HBP-aMRI). Two readers evaluated each set and reported the probability of malignancy and possibility of non-HCC malignancy per lesion. Using the pathology report as reference, the diagnostic performance of each aMRI was compared. RESULTS This study included 289 observations (219 HCCs, 22 non-HCC malignancies, and 48 benign lesions). Defining category definite malignancy as test positive, the performance of each aMRI was as follows: sensitivity, 94.6%, 88.8%, and 92.5%; and specificity, 83.3%, 91.7%, and 85.4% for HBP-aMRI, Dyn-aMRI, and NC-aMRI, respectively. Pairwise comparison revealed higher sensitivity of HBP-aMRI than both Dyn-aMRI (P = 0.003) and NC-aMRI (P = 0.025), and higher specificity of Dyn-aMRI than HBP-aMRI (P = 0.046). CONCLUSION HBP-aMRI showed better sensitivity than Dyn-aMRI or NC-aMRI, whereas the sensitivity of NC-aMRI was comparable to Dyn-aMRI in the detection of malignancy in high-risk patients. Dyn-aMRI showed better specificity than HBP-aMRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeong Hyun Lee
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Kon Kim
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Ji Hye Min
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Dongik Cha
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong Ah Hwang
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Soohyun Ahn
- Department of Mathematics, Ajou University, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Patel R, Aslam A, Parikh ND, Mervak B, Mubarak E, Higgins L, Lala K, Conner JF, Khaykin V, Bashir M, Do RKG, Burke LMB, Smith EN, Kim CY, Shampain KL, Owen D, Mendiratta-Lala M. Updates on LI-RADS Treatment Response Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Focusing on MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2023; 57:1641-1654. [PMID: 36872608 PMCID: PMC11078141 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2023] Open
Abstract
As the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and subsequent treatments with liver-directed therapies rise, the complexity of assessing lesion response has also increased. The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (LI-RADS) treatment response algorithm (LI-RADS TRA) was created to standardize the assessment of response after locoregional therapy (LRT) on contrast-enhanced CT or MRI. Originally created based on expert opinion, these guidelines are currently undergoing revision based on emerging evidence. While many studies support the use of LR-TRA for evaluation of HCC response after thermal ablation and intra-arterial embolic therapy, data suggest a need for refinements to improve assessment after radiation therapy. In this manuscript, we review expected MR imaging findings after different forms of LRT, clarify how to apply the current LI-RADS TRA by type of LRT, explore emerging literature on LI-RADS TRA, and highlight future updates to the algorithm. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 3. TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richa Patel
- Department of Radiology, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Anum Aslam
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Neehar D Parikh
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Benjamin Mervak
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Eman Mubarak
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Lily Higgins
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Kayli Lala
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Jack F Conner
- Department of Radiology, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, Ohio, USA
| | - Valerie Khaykin
- Department of Radiology and Hepatology, University of Michigan Medicine, Michigan, USA
| | - Mustafa Bashir
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Richard Kinh Gian Do
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Lauren M B Burke
- Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Elainea N Smith
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Charles Y Kim
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kimberly L Shampain
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Dawn Owen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Can MRI features predict clinically relevant hepatocellular carcinoma genetic subtypes? Abdom Radiol (NY) 2023; 48:1955-1964. [PMID: 36933025 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-023-03876-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2022] [Revised: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Recent studies in cancer genomics have revealed core drivers for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) pathogenesis. We aim to study whether MRI features can serve as non-invasive markers for the prediction of common genetic subtypes of HCC. METHODS Sequencing of 447 cancer-implicated genes was performed on 43 pathology proven HCC from 42 patients, who underwent contrast-enhanced MRI followed by biopsy or resection. MRI features were retrospectively evaluated including tumor size, infiltrative tumor margin, diffusion restriction, arterial phase hyperenhancement, non-peripheral washout, enhancing capsule, peritumoral enhancement, tumor in vein, fat in mass, blood products in mass, cirrhosis and tumor heterogeneity. Fisher's exact test was used to correlate genetic subtypes with imaging features. Prediction performance using correlated MRI features for genetic subtype and inter-reader agreement were assessed. RESULTS The two most prevalent genetic mutations were TP53 (13/43, 30%) and CTNNB1 (17/43, 40%). Tumors with TP53 mutation more often demonstrated an infiltrative tumor margin on MRI (p = 0.01); inter-reader agreement was almost perfect (kappa = 0.95). The CTNNB1 mutation was associated with peritumoral enhancement on MRI (p = 0.04), inter-reader agreement was substantial (kappa = 0.74). The MRI feature of an infiltrative tumor margin correlated with the TP53 mutation with accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 74.4%, 61.5% and 80.0%, respectively. Peritumoral enhancement correlated with the CTNNB1 mutation with accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 69.8%, 47.0% and 84.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION An infiltrative tumor margin on MRI correlated with TP53 mutation and peritumoral enhancement correlated with CTNNB1 mutation in HCC. Absence of these MRI features are potential negative predictors of the respective HCC genetic subtypes that have implications for prognosis and treatment response.
Collapse
|
27
|
Risk stratification of solitary hepatocellular carcinoma ≤ 5 cm without microvascular invasion: prognostic values of MR imaging features based on LI-RADS and clinical parameters. Eur Radiol 2023; 33:3592-3603. [PMID: 36884087 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09484-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Revised: 02/05/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To estimate the potential of preoperative MR imaging features and clinical parameters in the risk stratification of patients with solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ≤ 5 cm without microvascular invasion (MVI) after hepatectomy. METHODS The study enrolled 166 patients with histopathological confirmed MVI-negative HCC retrospectively. The MR imaging features were evaluated by two radiologists independently. The risk factors associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS) were identified by univariate Cox regression analysis and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Cox regression analysis. A predictive nomogram was developed based on these risk factors, and the performance was tested in the validation cohort. The RFS was analyzed by using the Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank test. RESULTS Among the 166 patients with solitary MVI-negative HCC, 86 patients presented with postoperative recurrence. Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that cirrhosis, tumor size, hepatitis, albumin, arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE), washout, and mosaic architecture were risk factors associated with poor RFS and then incorporated into the nomogram. The nomogram achieved good performance with C-index values of 0.713 and 0.707 in the development and validation cohorts, respectively. Furthermore, patients were stratified into high- and low-risk subgroups, and significant prognostic differences were found between the different subgroups in both cohorts (p < 0.001 and p = 0.024, respectively). CONCLUSION The nomogram incorporated preoperative MR imaging features, and clinical parameters can be a simple and reliable tool for predicting RFS and achieving risk stratification in patients with solitary MVI-negative HCC. KEY POINTS • Application of preoperative MR imaging features and clinical parameters can effectively predict RFS in patients with solitary MVI-negative HCC. • Risk factors including cirrhosis, tumor size, hepatitis, albumin, APHE, washout, and mosaic architecture were associated with worse prognosis in patients with solitary MVI-negative HCC. • Based on the nomogram incorporating these risk factors, the MVI-negative HCC patients could be stratified into two subgroups with significant different prognoses.
Collapse
|
28
|
de Lange C, Möller T, Hebelka H. Fontan-associated liver disease: Diagnosis, surveillance, and management. Front Pediatr 2023; 11:1100514. [PMID: 36937979 PMCID: PMC10020358 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1100514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The Fontan operation is a lifesaving procedure for patients with functional single-ventricle congenital heart disease, where hypoplastic left heart syndrome is the most frequent anomaly. Hemodynamic changes following Fontan circulation creation are now increasingly recognized to cause multiorgan affection, where the development of a chronic liver disease, Fontan-associated liver disease (FALD), is one of the most important morbidities. Virtually, all patients with a Fontan circulation develop liver congestion, resulting in fibrosis and cirrhosis, and most patients experience childhood onset. FALD is a distinctive type of congestive hepatopathy, and its pathogenesis is thought to be a multifactorial process driven by increased nonpulsatile central venous pressure and decreased cardiac output, both of which are inherent in the Fontan circulation. In the advanced stage of liver injury, complications of portal hypertension often occur, and there is a risk of developing secondary liver cancer, reported at young age. However, FALD develops with few clinical symptoms, a surprisingly variable degree of severity in liver disease, and with little relation to poor cardiac function. The disease mechanisms and modifying factors of its development are still not fully understood. As one of the more important noncardiac complications of the Fontan circulation, FALD needs to be diagnosed in a timely manner with a structured monitoring scheme of disease development, early detection of malignancy, and determination of the optimal time point for transplantation. There is also a clear need for consensus on the best surveillance strategy for FALD. In this regard, imaging plays an important role together with clinical scoring systems, biochemical workups, and histology. Patients operated on with a Fontan circulation are generally followed up in cardiology units. Ultimately, the resulting multiorgan affection requires a multidisciplinary team of healthcare personnel to address the different organ complications. This article discusses the current concepts, diagnosis, and management of FALD, with special emphasis on the role of different imaging techniques in the diagnosis and monitoring of disease progression, as well as current recommendations for liver disease surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte de Lange
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Queen Silvia Children’s Hospital, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Institution of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Thomas Möller
- Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hanna Hebelka
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Queen Silvia Children’s Hospital, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Institution of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma. JOURNAL OF LIVER CANCER 2023; 23:1-120. [PMID: 37384024 PMCID: PMC10202234 DOI: 10.17998/jlc.2022.11.07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the fourth most common cancer among men in South Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle and old age. The current practice guidelines will provide useful and sensible advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 49 experts in the fields of hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology from the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2018 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions. These guidelines provide useful information and direction for all clinicians, trainees, and researchers in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Korean Liver Cancer Association (KLCA) and National Cancer Center (NCC) Korea
- Corresponding author: KLCA-NCC Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee (KPGRC) (Committee Chair: Joong-Won Park) Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang 10408, Korea Tel. +82-31-920-1605, Fax: +82-31-920-1520, E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Park S, Byun J, Hwang SM. Utilization of a Machine Learning Algorithm for the Application of Ancillary Features to LI-RADS Categories LR3 and LR4 on Gadoxetate Disodium-Enhanced MRI. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15051361. [PMID: 36900153 PMCID: PMC10000173 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15051361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Revised: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to identify the important ancillary features (AFs) and determine the utilization of a machine-learning-based strategy for applying AFs for LI-RADS LR3/4 observations on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed MRI features of LR3/4 determined with only major features. Uni- and multivariate analyses and random forest analysis were performed to identify AFs associated with HCC. A decision tree algorithm of applying AFs for LR3/4 was compared with other alternative strategies using McNemar's test. RESULTS We evaluated 246 observations from 165 patients. In multivariate analysis, restricted diffusion and mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity showed independent associations with HCC (odds ratios: 12.4 [p < 0.001] and 2.5 [p = 0.02]). In random forest analysis, restricted diffusion is the most important feature for HCC. Our decision tree algorithm showed higher AUC, sensitivity, and accuracy (0.84, 92.0%, and 84.5%) than the criteria of usage of restricted diffusion (0.78, 64.5%, and 76.4%; all p < 0.05); however, our decision tree algorithm showed lower specificity than the criterion of usage of restricted diffusion (71.1% vs. 91.3%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Our decision tree algorithm of applying AFs for LR3/4 shows significantly increased AUC, sensitivity, and accuracy but reduced specificity. These appear to be more appropriate in certain circumstances in which there is an emphasis on the early detection of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seongkeun Park
- Machine Intelligence Laboratory, Department of Smart Automobile, Soonchunhyang University, Asan 31538, Republic of Korea
| | - Jieun Byun
- Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 07804, Republic of Korea
- Correspondence:
| | - Sook Min Hwang
- Department of Radiology, Hallym University College of Medicine, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul 07441, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Jiang H, Wei H, Yang T, Qin Y, Wu Y, Chen W, Shi Y, Ronot M, Bashir MR, Song B. VICT2 Trait: Prognostic Alternative to Peritumoral Hepatobiliary Phase Hypointensity in HCC. Radiology 2023; 307:e221835. [PMID: 36786702 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.221835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Abstract
Background Peritumoral hepatobiliary phase (HBP) hypointensity is an established prognostic imaging feature in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), often associated with microvascular invasion (MVI). Similar prognostic features are needed for non-HBP MRI. Purpose To propose a non-hepatobiliary-specific MRI tool with similar prognostic value to peritumoral HBP hypointensity. Materials and Methods From December 2011 to November 2021, consecutive patients with HCC who underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced MRI were retrospectively enrolled and followed up until recurrence. All MRI scans were reviewed by two blinded radiologists with 7 and 10 years of experiences with liver MRI. A scoring system based on non-hepatobiliary-specific features that highly correlated with peritumoral HBP hypointensity was identified in a stratified sampling-derived training set of the gadoxetate disodium (EOB) group by means of multivariable logistic regression, and its values to predict MVI and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were assessed. Results There were 660 patients (551 men; median age, 53 years; IQR, 45-61 years) enrolled. Peritumoral portal venous phase hypoenhancement (odds ratio [OR] = 8.8), incomplete "capsule" (OR = 3.3), corona enhancement (OR, 2.6), and peritumoral mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity (OR, 2.2) (all P < .001) were associated with peritumoral HBP hypointensity and constituted the "VICT2 trait" (test set area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.84; 95% CI: 0.78, 0.90). For the EOB group, both peritumoral HBP hypointensity (OR for MVI = 2.5, P = .02; hazard ratio for RFS = 2.5, P < .001) and the VICT2 trait (OR for MVI = 5.1, P < .001; hazard ratio for RFS = 2.3, P < .001) were associated with MVI and RFS, despite a higher specificity of the VICT2 trait for MVI (89% vs 80%, P = .01). These values of the VICT2 trait were confirmed in the extracellular contrast agent group (OR for MVI = 4.0; hazard ratio for RFS = 1.7; both P < .001). Conclusion Based on four non-hepatobiliary-specific MRI features, the VICT2 trait was comparable to peritumoral hepatobiliary phase hypointensity in predicting microvascular invasion and postoperative recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma. © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Harmath in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanyu Jiang
- From the Department of Radiology (H.J., H.W., T.Y., Y.Q., W.C., B.S.) and Laboratory of Pathology, Key Laboratory of Transplant Engineering and Immunology, NHC (Y.S.), West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu 610041, China; Big Data Research Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China (Y.W.); Université Paris Cité, UMR 1149, CRI, Paris & Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Beaujon, APHP.Nord, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, and Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); and Department of Radiology, Sanya People's Hospital, Sanya, China (B.S.)
| | - Hong Wei
- From the Department of Radiology (H.J., H.W., T.Y., Y.Q., W.C., B.S.) and Laboratory of Pathology, Key Laboratory of Transplant Engineering and Immunology, NHC (Y.S.), West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu 610041, China; Big Data Research Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China (Y.W.); Université Paris Cité, UMR 1149, CRI, Paris & Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Beaujon, APHP.Nord, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, and Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); and Department of Radiology, Sanya People's Hospital, Sanya, China (B.S.)
| | - Ting Yang
- From the Department of Radiology (H.J., H.W., T.Y., Y.Q., W.C., B.S.) and Laboratory of Pathology, Key Laboratory of Transplant Engineering and Immunology, NHC (Y.S.), West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu 610041, China; Big Data Research Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China (Y.W.); Université Paris Cité, UMR 1149, CRI, Paris & Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Beaujon, APHP.Nord, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, and Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); and Department of Radiology, Sanya People's Hospital, Sanya, China (B.S.)
| | - Yun Qin
- From the Department of Radiology (H.J., H.W., T.Y., Y.Q., W.C., B.S.) and Laboratory of Pathology, Key Laboratory of Transplant Engineering and Immunology, NHC (Y.S.), West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu 610041, China; Big Data Research Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China (Y.W.); Université Paris Cité, UMR 1149, CRI, Paris & Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Beaujon, APHP.Nord, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, and Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); and Department of Radiology, Sanya People's Hospital, Sanya, China (B.S.)
| | - Yuanan Wu
- From the Department of Radiology (H.J., H.W., T.Y., Y.Q., W.C., B.S.) and Laboratory of Pathology, Key Laboratory of Transplant Engineering and Immunology, NHC (Y.S.), West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu 610041, China; Big Data Research Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China (Y.W.); Université Paris Cité, UMR 1149, CRI, Paris & Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Beaujon, APHP.Nord, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, and Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); and Department of Radiology, Sanya People's Hospital, Sanya, China (B.S.)
| | - Weixia Chen
- From the Department of Radiology (H.J., H.W., T.Y., Y.Q., W.C., B.S.) and Laboratory of Pathology, Key Laboratory of Transplant Engineering and Immunology, NHC (Y.S.), West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu 610041, China; Big Data Research Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China (Y.W.); Université Paris Cité, UMR 1149, CRI, Paris & Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Beaujon, APHP.Nord, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, and Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); and Department of Radiology, Sanya People's Hospital, Sanya, China (B.S.)
| | - Yujun Shi
- From the Department of Radiology (H.J., H.W., T.Y., Y.Q., W.C., B.S.) and Laboratory of Pathology, Key Laboratory of Transplant Engineering and Immunology, NHC (Y.S.), West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu 610041, China; Big Data Research Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China (Y.W.); Université Paris Cité, UMR 1149, CRI, Paris & Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Beaujon, APHP.Nord, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, and Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); and Department of Radiology, Sanya People's Hospital, Sanya, China (B.S.)
| | - Maxime Ronot
- From the Department of Radiology (H.J., H.W., T.Y., Y.Q., W.C., B.S.) and Laboratory of Pathology, Key Laboratory of Transplant Engineering and Immunology, NHC (Y.S.), West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu 610041, China; Big Data Research Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China (Y.W.); Université Paris Cité, UMR 1149, CRI, Paris & Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Beaujon, APHP.Nord, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, and Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); and Department of Radiology, Sanya People's Hospital, Sanya, China (B.S.)
| | - Mustafa R Bashir
- From the Department of Radiology (H.J., H.W., T.Y., Y.Q., W.C., B.S.) and Laboratory of Pathology, Key Laboratory of Transplant Engineering and Immunology, NHC (Y.S.), West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu 610041, China; Big Data Research Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China (Y.W.); Université Paris Cité, UMR 1149, CRI, Paris & Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Beaujon, APHP.Nord, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, and Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); and Department of Radiology, Sanya People's Hospital, Sanya, China (B.S.)
| | - Bin Song
- From the Department of Radiology (H.J., H.W., T.Y., Y.Q., W.C., B.S.) and Laboratory of Pathology, Key Laboratory of Transplant Engineering and Immunology, NHC (Y.S.), West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu 610041, China; Big Data Research Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China (Y.W.); Université Paris Cité, UMR 1149, CRI, Paris & Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Beaujon, APHP.Nord, Clichy, France (M.R.); Department of Radiology, Center for Advanced Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, and Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (M.R.B.); and Department of Radiology, Sanya People's Hospital, Sanya, China (B.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Wu ZQ, Cheng J, Xiao XX, Zhang HR, Wang J, Peng J, Liu C, Cai P, Li XM. Preoperative prediction of early recurrence of HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma (≤5 cm) by visceral adipose tissue index. Front Surg 2023; 9:985168. [PMID: 36684155 PMCID: PMC9852492 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.985168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background This study aimed to investigate whether visceral adipose tissue index (VATI) is a significant risk factor for the early recurrence (ER) of HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (≤5 cm) after hepatectomy. Methods The recruited cohort patients who were positive for hepatitis B virus, presented with surgically confirmed HCC (≤5 cm) from Army Medical University (internal training cohort: n = 192) and Chongqing Medical University (external validation group: n = 46). We measured VATI, subcutaneous adipose tissue index (SATI) via computed tomography (CT). ER was defined as recurrence within 2 years after hepatectomy. The impact of parameters on outcome after hepatectomy for HCC was analyzed. Results Univariate analysis showed that alpha-fetoprotein levels (p = 0.044), body mass index (BMI) (p < 0.001), SATI (p < 0.001), and VATI (p < 0.001) were significantly different between ER and non-ER groups in internal training cohort. Multivariate analysis identified VATI as an independent risk factor for ER (odds ratio = 1.07, 95% confidence interval: 1.047-1.094, p < 0.001), with a AUC of 0.802, based on the cut-off value of VATI, which was divided into high risk (≥37.45 cm2/m2) and low risk (<37.45 cm2/m2) groups. The prognosis of low risk group was significantly higher than that of high risk group (p < 0.001). The AUC value of VATI in external validation group was 0.854. Conclusion VATI was an independent risk factor for the ER, and higher VATI was closely related to poor outcomes after hepatectomy for HBV-related HCC (≤5 cm).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zong-qian Wu
- Department of Radiology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China
| | - Jie Cheng
- Department of Radiology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China
| | - Xi-xi Xiao
- Department of Oncology and Southwest Cancer Center, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China
| | - Hua-rong Zhang
- Institute of Pathology and Southwest Cancer Center, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China
| | - Jian Wang
- Department of Radiology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China
| | - Juan Peng
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Chen Liu
- Department of Radiology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China
| | - Ping Cai
- Department of Radiology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China,Correspondence: Ping Cai Xiao-ming Li
| | - Xiao-ming Li
- Department of Radiology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China,Correspondence: Ping Cai Xiao-ming Li
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Yang L, Wang M, Zhu Y, Zhang J, Pan J, Zhao Y, Sun K, Chen F. Corona enhancement combined with microvascular invasion for prognosis prediction of macrotrabecular-massive hepatocellular carcinoma subtype. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1138848. [PMID: 36890813 PMCID: PMC9986746 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1138848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives The macrotrabecular-massive (MTM) subtype of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is aggressive and associated with an unfavorable prognosis. This study aimed to characterize MTM-HCC features based on contrast-enhanced MRI and to evaluate the prognosis of imaging characteristics combined with pathology for predicting early recurrence and overall survival after surgery. Methods This retrospective study included 123 patients with HCC that underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced MRI and surgery, between July 2020 and October 2021. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to investigate factors associated with MTM-HCC. Predictors of early recurrence were determined with a Cox proportional hazards model and validated in a separate retrospective cohort. Results The primary cohort included 53 patients with MTM-HCC (median age 59 years; 46 male and 7 females; median BMI 23.5 kg/m2) and 70 subjects with non-MTM HCC (median age 61.5 years; 55 male and 15 females; median BMI 22.6 kg/m2) (All P>0.05). The multivariate analysis identified corona enhancement (odds ratio [OR]=2.52, 95% CI: 1.02-6.24; P=0.045) as an independent predictor of the MTM-HCC subtype. The multiple Cox regression analysis identified corona enhancement (hazard ratio [HR]=2.56, 95% CI: 1.08-6.08; P=0.033) and MVI (HR=2.45, 95% CI: 1.40-4.30; P=0.002) as independent predictors of early recurrence (area under the curve=0.790, P<0.001). The prognostic significance of these markers was confirmed by comparing results in the validation cohort to those from the primary cohort. Corona enhancement combined with MVI was significantly associated with poor outcomes after surgery. Conclusions A nomogram for predicting early recurrence based on corona enhancement and MVI could be used to characterize patients with MTM-HCC and predict their prognosis for early recurrence and overall survival after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lili Yang
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Meng Wang
- Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yanyan Zhu
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jiahui Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Third People's Hospital of Hangzhou, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Junhan Pan
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yanci Zhao
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Ke Sun
- Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Feng Chen
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.,Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular Imaging of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Bilal Masokano I, Pei Y, Chen J, Liu W, Xie S, Liu H, Feng D, He Q, Li W. Development and validation of MRI-based model for the preoperative prediction of macrotrabecular hepatocellular carcinoma subtype. Insights Imaging 2022; 13:201. [PMID: 36544029 PMCID: PMC9772375 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-022-01333-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 11/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Macrotrabecular hepatocellular carcinoma (MTHCC) has a poor prognosis and is difficult to diagnose preoperatively. The purpose is to build and validate MRI-based models to predict the MTHCC subtype. METHODS Two hundred eight patients with confirmed HCC were enrolled. Three models (model 1: clinicoradiologic model; model 2: fusion radiomics signature; model 3: combined model 1 and model 2) were built based on their clinical data and MR images to predict MTHCC in training and validation cohorts. The performance of the models was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC). The clinical utility of the models was estimated by decision curve analysis (DCA). A nomogram was constructed, and its calibration was evaluated. RESULTS Model 1 is easier to build than models 2 and 3, with a good AUC of 0.773 (95% CI 0.696-0.838) and 0.801 (95% CI 0.681-0.891) in predicting MTHCC in training and validation cohorts, respectively. It performed slightly superior to model 2 in both training (AUC 0.747; 95% CI 0.689-0.806; p = 0.548) and validation (AUC 0.718; 95% CI 0.618-0.810; p = 0.089) cohorts and was similar to model 3 in the validation (AUC 0.866; 95% CI 0.801-0.928; p = 0.321) but inferior in the training (AUC 0.889; 95% CI 0.851-0.926; p = 0.001) cohorts. The DCA of model 1 had a higher net benefit than the treat-all and treat-none strategy at a threshold probability of 10%. The calibration curves of model 1 closely aligned with the true MTHCC rates in the training (p = 0.355) and validation sets (p = 0.364). CONCLUSION The clinicoradiologic model has a good performance in diagnosing MTHCC, and it is simpler and easier to implement, making it a valuable tool for pretherapeutic decision-making in patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ismail Bilal Masokano
- grid.216417.70000 0001 0379 7164Department of Radiology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 168 Xiangya Road, Kaifu District, Changsha, 410008 Hunan China ,grid.216417.70000 0001 0379 7164National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008 Hunan China ,grid.216417.70000 0001 0379 7164Department of Radiology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410013 Hunan China
| | - Yigang Pei
- grid.216417.70000 0001 0379 7164Department of Radiology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 168 Xiangya Road, Kaifu District, Changsha, 410008 Hunan China ,grid.216417.70000 0001 0379 7164National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008 Hunan China
| | - Juan Chen
- grid.216417.70000 0001 0379 7164Department of Radiology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 168 Xiangya Road, Kaifu District, Changsha, 410008 Hunan China ,grid.216417.70000 0001 0379 7164National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008 Hunan China
| | - Wenguang Liu
- grid.216417.70000 0001 0379 7164Department of Radiology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 168 Xiangya Road, Kaifu District, Changsha, 410008 Hunan China ,grid.216417.70000 0001 0379 7164National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008 Hunan China
| | - Simin Xie
- grid.216417.70000 0001 0379 7164Department of Radiology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 168 Xiangya Road, Kaifu District, Changsha, 410008 Hunan China ,grid.216417.70000 0001 0379 7164National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008 Hunan China
| | - Huaping Liu
- grid.216417.70000 0001 0379 7164Department of Radiology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410013 Hunan China
| | - Deyun Feng
- grid.216417.70000 0001 0379 7164Department of Pathology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008 Hunan China
| | - Qiongqiong He
- grid.216417.70000 0001 0379 7164Department of Pathology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008 Hunan China
| | - Wenzheng Li
- grid.216417.70000 0001 0379 7164Department of Radiology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 168 Xiangya Road, Kaifu District, Changsha, 410008 Hunan China ,grid.216417.70000 0001 0379 7164National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008 Hunan China
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
2022 KLCA-NCC Korea Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Korean J Radiol 2022; 23:1126-1240. [PMID: 36447411 PMCID: PMC9747269 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2022.0822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the fourth most common cancer among men in South Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle and old age. The current practice guidelines will provide useful and sensible advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 49 experts in the fields of hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology from the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2018 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions. These guidelines provide useful information and direction for all clinicians, trainees, and researchers in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.
Collapse
|
36
|
Rimola J, Sapena V, Brancatelli G, Darnell A, Forzenigo L, Mähringer-Kunz A, Paisant A, Renzulli M, Schima W, Terraz S, Valls C, Wagner M, Ayuso C, Vilgrain V, Reig M, Ronot M. Reliability of extracellular contrast versus gadoxetic acid in assessing small liver lesions using liver imaging reporting and data system v.2018 and European association for the study of the liver criteria. Hepatology 2022; 76:1318-1328. [PMID: 35349760 DOI: 10.1002/hep.32494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Revised: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS The diagnostic accuracy of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v.2018 and European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) criteria for the diagnosis of HCC have been widely evaluated, but their reliability should be investigated. We aimed to assess and compare the reliability of LI-RADS v.2018 and EASL criteria for the diagnosis of HCC using MRI with extracellular contrast agents (ECAs) and gadoxetic acid (GA) and determine the effect of ancillary features on LI-RADS reliability. APPROACH & RESULTS Ten readers reviewed MRI studies of 92 focal liver lesions measuring <3 cm acquired with ECAs and GA <1 month apart from two prospective trials, assessing EASL criteria, LI-RADS major and ancillary features, and LI-RADS categorization with and without including ancillary features. Inter-reader agreement for definite HCC diagnosis was substantial and similar for the two contrasts for both EASL and LI-RADS criteria. For ECA-MRI and GA-MRI, respectively, inter-reader agreement was k = 0.72 (95% CI, 0.63-0.81) and k = 0.72 (95% CI, 0.63-0.80); for nonrim hyperenhancement, k = 0.63 (95% CI, 0.54-0.72) and k = 0.57 (95% CI, 0.48-0.66); and for nonperipheral washout, k = 0.49 (95% CI, 0.40-0.59) and k = 0.48 (95% CI, 0.37-0.58) for enhancing capsule. The inter-reader agreement for LI-RADS after applying ancillary features remained in the same range of agreement. CONCLUSIONS Agreement for definite HCC was substantial and similar for both scoring systems and the two contrast agents in small focal liver lesions. Agreement for LI-RADS categorization was lower for both contrast agents, and including LI-RADS ancillary features did not improve agreement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordi Rimola
- BCLC Group, Radiology Department, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Giuseppe Brancatelli
- Dipartimento di Biomedicina, Neuroscienze e Diagnostica avanzata (BIND), University Hospital of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Anna Darnell
- BCLC Group, Radiology Department, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura Forzenigo
- Radiology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Aline Mähringer-Kunz
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Anita Paisant
- Radiology Department, Angers University Hospital, UNIV Angers, HIFIH, EA, Angers, France
| | - Matteo Renzulli
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Wolfgang Schima
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Barmherzige Schwestern Krankenhaus, and Sankt Josef Krankenhaus, Göttlicher Heiland Krankenhaus, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sylvain Terraz
- Department of Radiology, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Centre, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Carlos Valls
- Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Division of Radiology, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mathilde Wagner
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, LIB, Department of Radiology, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Carmen Ayuso
- BCLC Group, Radiology Department, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Valerie Vilgrain
- Department of Radiology, Hopital Beaujon, APHP. Nord, Clichy, France
- Université de Paris, CRI, INSERM, Paris, France
| | - Maria Reig
- BCLC Group, Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maxime Ronot
- Department of Radiology, Hopital Beaujon, APHP. Nord, Clichy, France
- Université de Paris, CRI, INSERM, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Chen FM, Du M, Qi X, Bian L, Wu D, Zhang SL, Wang J, Zhou Y, Zhu X. Nomogram Estimating Vessels Encapsulating Tumor Clusters in Hepatocellular Carcinoma From Preoperative Gadoxetate Disodium-Enhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2022; 57:1893-1905. [PMID: 36259347 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Revised: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vessels encapsulating tumor clusters (VETC) pattern is a novel microvascular pattern associated with poor outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Preoperative estimation of VETC has potential to improve treatment decisions. PURPOSE To develop and validate a nomogram based on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI for estimating VETC in HCC and to evaluate whether the estimations are associated with recurrence after hepatic resection. STUDY TYPE Retrospective. POPULATION A total of 320 patients with HCC and histopathologic VETC pattern assessment from three centers (development cohort:validation cohort = 173:147). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE A3.0 T/turbo spin-echo T2-weighted, spin-echo echo-planar diffusion-weighted, and 3D T1-weighted gradient-echo sequences. ASSESSMENT A set of previously reported VETC- and/or prognosis-correlated qualitative and quantitative imaging features were assessed. Clinical and imaging variables were compared based on histopathologic VETC status to investigate factors indicating VETC pattern. A regression-based nomogram was then constructed using the significant factors for VETC pattern. The nomogram-estimated VETC stratification was assessed for its association with recurrence. STATISTICAL TESTS Fisher exact test, t-test or Mann-Whitney test, logistic regression analyses, Harrell's concordance index (C-index), nomogram, Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS Pathological VETC pattern presence was identified in 156 patients (development cohort:validation cohort = 83:73). Tumor size, presence of heterogeneous enhancement with septations or with irregular ring-like structures, and necrosis were significant factors for estimating VETC pattern. The nomogram incorporating these indicators showed good discrimination with a C-index of 0.870 (development cohort) and 0.862 (validation cohort). Significant differences in recurrence rates between the nomogram-estimated high-risk VETC group and low-risk VETC group were found (2-year recurrence rates, 50.7% vs. 30.3% and 49.6% vs. 31.8% in the development and validation cohorts, respectively). DATA CONCLUSION The nomogram integrating gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI features was associated with VETC pattern preoperatively and with postoperative recurrence in patients with HCC. EVIDENCE LEVEL 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fang-Ming Chen
- Department of Interventional Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.,Department of Radiology, the Affiliated Wuxi No. 2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, China
| | - Mingzhan Du
- Department of Pathology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Xiumin Qi
- Department of Pathology, the Affiliated Wuxi No. 2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, China
| | - Linjie Bian
- Department of Radiology, the Affiliated Wuxi No. 2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, China
| | - Danping Wu
- Department of Radiology, the Affiliated Wuxi No. 2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, China
| | - Shuang-Lin Zhang
- Department of Radiology, the Affiliated Wuxi No. 2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, China
| | - Jitao Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Xingtai Institute of Cancer Control, the Affiliated Xingtai People's Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Xingtai, China
| | - Yongping Zhou
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the Affiliated Wuxi No. 2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, China
| | - Xiaoli Zhu
- Department of Interventional Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Mol Hepatol 2022; 28:583-705. [PMID: 36263666 PMCID: PMC9597235 DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2022.0294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 161] [Impact Index Per Article: 53.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the fourth most common cancer among men in South Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle and old age. The current practice guidelines will provide useful and sensible advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 49 experts in the fields of hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology from the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2018 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions. These guidelines provide useful information and direction for all clinicians, trainees, and researchers in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.
Collapse
|
39
|
Wei H, Yang T, Chen J, Duan T, Jiang H, Song B. Prognostic implications of CT/MRI LI-RADS in hepatocellular carcinoma: State of the art and future directions. Liver Int 2022; 42:2131-2144. [PMID: 35808845 DOI: 10.1111/liv.15362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2022] [Revised: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fourth most lethal malignancy with an increasing incidence worldwide. Management of HCC has followed several clinical staging systems that rely on tumour morphologic characteristics and clinical variables. However, these algorithms are unlikely to profile the full landscape of tumour aggressiveness and allow accurate prognosis stratification. Noninvasive imaging biomarkers on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) exhibit a promising prospect to refine the prognostication of HCC. The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) is a comprehensive system for standardizing the terminology, techniques, interpretation, reporting and data collection of liver imaging. At present, it has been widely accepted as an effective diagnostic system for HCC in at-risk patients. Emerging data have provided new insights into the potential of CT/MRI LI-RADS in HCC prognostication, which may help refine the prognostic paradigm of HCC that promises to direct individualized management and improve patient outcomes. Therefore, this review aims to summarize several prognostic imaging features at CT/MRI for patients with HCC; the available evidence regarding the use of LI-RDAS for evaluation of tumour biology and clinical outcomes, pitfalls of current literature, and future directions for LI-RADS in the management of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Wei
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ting Yang
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jie Chen
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ting Duan
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Hanyu Jiang
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Bin Song
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,Department of Radiology, Sanya People's Hospital, Sanya, China
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Interrater reliability and agreement of the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018 for the evaluation of hepatic lesions. Pol J Radiol 2022; 87:e316-e324. [PMID: 35892071 PMCID: PMC9288199 DOI: 10.5114/pjr.2022.117590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2021] [Accepted: 08/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) is a structured reporting system that categorizes hepatic observations according to major imaging features and lesion size, with an optional ancillary features contribution. This study aimed to evaluate inter-reader agreement of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using LI-RADS v2018 lexicon. Material and methods Forty-nine patients with 69 hepatic observations were included in our study. The major and ancillary features of each hepatic observation were evaluated by 2 radiologists using LI-RADS v2018, and the interreader agreement was allocated. Results The inter-reader agreement of major LI-RADS features was substantial; κ of non-rim arterial hyperenhancement, non-peripheral washout appearance, and enhancing capsule was 0.796, 0.799, and 0.772 (p < 0.001), respectively. The agreement of the final LI-RADS category was substantial with κ = 0.651 (p < 0.001), and weighted κ = 0.786 (p < 0.001). The inter-reader agreement of the ancillary features was substantial to almost perfect (k range from 0.718 to 1; p < 0.001). An almost perfect correlation was noted for the hepatic lesion size measurement with ICC = 0.977 (p < 0.001). Conclusions The major and ancillary features of the LI-RADS v2018, as well as the final category and lesions size, have substantial to almost perfect inter-reader agreement.
Collapse
|
41
|
Liang X, Shi S, Gao T. Preoperative gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI predicts aggressive pathological features in LI-RADS category 5 hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Radiol 2022; 77:708-716. [PMID: 35738938 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2022.05.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Revised: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
AIM To investigate whether Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) imaging features and non-LI-RADS imaging features can predict aggressive pathological features in adult patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS From February 2018 to September 2021, 236 adult patients with cirrhosis or hepatitis B virus infection in which liver cancer was suspected underwent MRI within 1 month before surgery. Significant MRI findings and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level predicted high-grade HCC and microvascular invasion (MVI) by univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS The study included 112 patients with histopathologically confirmed liver cancer (≤5 cm), 35 of whom (31.3%) high-grade HCC and 42 of 112 (37.5%) patients had MVI. Mosaic architecture (odds ratio [OR] = 6.031; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.366, 26.626; p=0.018), coronal enhancement (OR=5.878; 95% CI: 1.471, 23.489; p=0.012), and intratumoural vessels (OR=5.278; 95% CI: 1.325, 21.020; p=0.018) were significant independent predictors of high-grade HCC. A non-smooth tumour margin (OR=10.237; 95% CI: 1.547, 67.760; p=0.016), coronal enhancement (OR=3.800; 95% CI: 1.152, 12.531; p=0.028), and peritumoural hypointensity on the hepatobiliary phase (HBP; OR=10.322; 95% CI: 2.733, 38.986; p=0.001) were significant independent predictors of MVI. CONCLUSION In high-risk adult patients with single LR-5 HCC (≤5 cm), mosaic architecture, coronal enhancement, and intratumoural vessels are independent predictors of high-grade HCC. Non-smooth tumour margin, coronal enhancement, and peritumoural hypointensity on HBP independently predicted MVI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- X Liang
- Department of Radiology, People's Hospital of Chongqing Banan District, Banan District, Chongqing, China
| | - S Shi
- Department of Radiology, People's Hospital of Chongqing Banan District, Banan District, Chongqing, China
| | - T Gao
- Department of Radiology, People's Hospital of Chongqing Banan District, Banan District, Chongqing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Value of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM) Imaging for Differentiation between Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma and Hepatocellular Carcinoma. CONTRAST MEDIA & MOLECULAR IMAGING 2022; 2022:1504463. [PMID: 35615729 PMCID: PMC9113914 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1504463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Revised: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Efficient noninvasive imaging techniques in the differentiation of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are very important because of their different management and prognosis. Our purpose was to evaluate the difference of parameters extracted from intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) between the two groups and their performance for the differentiation, as well as the significance of perfusion information. IVIM studies (9 b-values) in 41 patients with either ICC or HCC were reviewed retrospectively by two observers. Diffusion coefficient (D), pseudodiffusion coefficient (D∗), perfusion fraction (f), ADC, and the mean percentage of parenchymal enhancement (MPPE) at 30 s after contrast-enhancement were calculated and compared between ICC and HCC. The relationship between D∗, f values, and MPPE was evaluated by Spearman's correlation test. The diagnostic efficacy of all parameters was analyzed by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Interobserver and intraobserver agreements were analyzed. The parameters (D and ADC) of ICC were distinctly higher than those of HCC; whereas the parameters (f and MPPE of arterial phase) were distinctly lower (all false discovery rate [FDR]-corrected P < 0.05). The metric D∗ value of ICC was slightly higher than that of HCC (71.44 vs 69.41) with FDR-corrected P > 0.05. Moreover, the value of parameter D was significantly lower than that of ADC (FDR-corrected P < 0.05). The parameters (D and f values) extracted from IVIM showed excellent diagnostic efficiency in the identification, and the diagnostic efficiency of D value was significantly higher than that of the ADC. There were positive correlations between perfusion-related parameters (D∗, f values) and MPPE. Interobserver and intraobserver agreements were excellent or perfect in measurements of all parameters. Parameters derived from IVIM were valuable for distinguishing ICC and HCC. Moreover, the D value showed better diagnostic efficiency for the differential diagnosis than monoexponential fitting-derived ADC value. Meanwhile, the significant correlation between perfusion-related parameters and MPPE demonstrates that specific IVIM metrics may serve as a noninvasive indicator for the vascular perfusion information of ICC and HCC.
Collapse
|
43
|
Singh R, Wilson MP, Manolea F, Ahmed B, Fung C, Receveur D, Low G. Diagnostic accuracy and inter-reader reliability of the MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (version 2018) risk stratification and management system. SA J Radiol 2022; 26:2386. [PMID: 35747784 PMCID: PMC9210145 DOI: 10.4102/sajr.v26i1.2386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2021] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be diagnosed non-invasively, provided certain imaging criteria are met. However, the recent Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2018 has not been widely validated. Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and reader reliability of the LI-RADS version 2018 lexicon amongst fellowship trained radiologists compared with an expert consensus reference standard. Method This retrospective study was conducted between 2018 and 2020. A total of 50 contrast enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies evaluating focal liver observations in patients with cirrhosis, hepatitis B virus (HBV) or prior HCC were acquired. The standard of reference was a consensus review by three fellowship-trained radiologists. Diagnostic accuracy including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive values (NPV) and area under the curve (AUC) values were calculated per LI-RADS category for each reader. Kappa statistics were used to measure reader agreement. Results Readers demonstrated excellent specificities (88% – 100%) and NPVs (85% – 100%) across all LI-RADS categories. Sensitivities were variable, ranging from 67% to 83% for LI-RADS 1, 29% to 43% for LI-RADS 2, 100% for LI-RADS 3, 70% to 80% for LI-RADS 4 and 80% to 84% for LI-RADS 5. Readers showed excellent accuracy for differentiating benign and malignant liver lesions with AUC values > 0.90. Overall inter-reader agreement was ‘good’ (kappa = 0.76, p < 0.001). Pairwise inter-reader agreement was ‘very good’ (kappa ≥ 0.90, p < 0.001). Conclusion The LI-RADS version 2018 demonstrates excellent specificity, NPV and AUC values for risk stratification of liver observations by radiologists. Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System can reliably differentiate benign from malignant lesions when used in conjunction with corresponding LI-RADS management recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ranjit Singh
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Mitchell P. Wilson
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Florin Manolea
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Bilal Ahmed
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Christopher Fung
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Darryn Receveur
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Gavin Low
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Liang Y, Xu F, Wang Z, Tan C, Zhang N, Wei X, Jiang X, Wu H. A gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI-based multivariable model using LI-RADS v2018 and other imaging features for preoperative prediction of macrotrabecular-massive hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Radiol 2022; 153:110356. [PMID: 35623312 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2022] [Revised: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify imaging features of macrotrabecular-massive hepatocellular carcinoma (MTM-HCC) using LI-RADS v2018 and other imaging features and to develop a gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (EOB-MRI)-based model for pretreatment prediction of MTM-HCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 93 patients with pathologically proven HCC (39 MTM-HCC and 54 non-MTM-HCC) were retrospectively evaluated with EOB-MRI at 3 T. Imaging analysis according to LI-RADS v2018 was evaluated by two readers. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine independent predictors for MTM-HCC. Different logistic regression models were built based on MRI features, including model A (enhancing capsule, blood products in mass and ascites), model B (enhancing capsule and ascites), model C (blood products in mass and ascites), and model D (blood products in mass and enhancing capsule). Diagnostic performance was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS After multivariate analysis, absence of enhancing capsule (odds ratio = 0.102, p = 0.010), absence of blood products in mass (odds ratio = 0.073, p = 0.030), and with ascites (odds ratio = 55.677, p = 0.028) were identified as independent differential factors for the presence of MTM-HCC. Model A yielded a sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of 35.90% (21.20,52.80), 94.44% (84.60, 98.80), and 0.731 (0.629, 0.818). Model A achieved a comparable AUC than model D (0.731 vs. 0.699, p = 0.333), but a higher AUC than model B (0.731 vs. 0.644, p = 0.048) and model C (0.731 vs. 0.650, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION The EOB-MRI-based model is promising for noninvasively predicting MTM-HCC and may assist clinicians in pretreatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yingying Liang
- Department of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University; School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, 1Panfu Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510180, China.
| | - Fan Xu
- Department of Radiology, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Medical College, Jinan University, 396 Tongfu road, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510220, China.
| | - Zihua Wang
- Department of Radiology, Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Foshan, Guangdong Province 528000, China.
| | - Caihong Tan
- Department of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University; School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, 1Panfu Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510180, China.
| | - Nianru Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University; School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, 1Panfu Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510180, China.
| | - Xinhua Wei
- Department of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University; School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, 1Panfu Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510180, China.
| | - Xinqing Jiang
- Department of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University; School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, 1Panfu Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510180, China.
| | - Hongzhen Wu
- Department of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University; School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, 1Panfu Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province 510180, China.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Malyarenko DI, Swanson SD, McGarry S, LaViolette P, Chenevert TL. The impeded diffusion fraction quantitative imaging assay demonstrated in multi-exponential diffusion phantom and prostate cancer. Magn Reson Med 2022; 87:2053-2062. [PMID: 34775621 PMCID: PMC8810585 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Revised: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To demonstrate a method for quantification of impeded diffusion fraction (IDF) using conventional clinical DWI protocols. METHODS The IDF formalism is introduced to quantify contribution from water coordinated by macromolecules to DWI voxel signal based on fundamentally different diffusion constants in vascular capillary, bulk free, and coordinated water compartments. IDF accuracy was studied as a function of b-value set. The IDF scaling with restricted compartment size and polyvinylpirrolidone (PVP) macromolecule concentration was compared to conventional apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and isotropic kurtosis model parameters for a diffusion phantom. An in vivo application was demonstrated for six prostate cancer (PCa) cases with low and high grade lesions annotated from whole mount histopathology. RESULTS IDF linearly scaled with known restricted (vesicular) compartment size and PVP concentration in phantoms and increased with histopathologic score in PCa (from median 9% for atrophy up to 60% for Gleason 7). IDF via non-linear fit was independent of b-value subset selected between b = 0.1 and 2 ms/µm2 , including standard-of-care (SOC) PCa protocol. With maximum sensitivity for high grade PCa, the IDF threshold below 51% reduced false positive rate (FPR = 0/6) for low-grade PCa compared to apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC > 0.81 µm2 /ms) of PIRADS PCa scoring (FPR = 3/6). CONCLUSION The proposed method may provide quantitative imaging assays of cancer grading using common SOC DWI protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dariya I. Malyarenko
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Scott D. Swanson
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Sean McGarry
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Engineering, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - Peter LaViolette
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Engineering, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - Thomas L. Chenevert
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Do transition and hepatobiliary phase hypointensity improve LI-RADS categorization as an alternative washout: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2022; 32:5134-5143. [PMID: 35267090 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08665-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Revised: 12/30/2021] [Accepted: 02/13/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The definition of washout in gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI (Gd-EOB-MRI) is controversial. The current Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) defines washout only in the portal venous phase on Gd-EOB-MRI, leading to low diagnostic sensitivity for HCC. We performed a meta-analysis to compare the diagnostic performance of Gd-EOB-MRI using conventional (cWO) and modified (mWO) definitions of washout. METHODS The PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched to identify studies published between January 1, 2010, and August 1, 2021, that compared the diagnostic performance of cWO and mWO for HCC. The mWOs added transition phase (TP) hypointensity (mWO-1), hepatobiliary phase (HBP) hypointensity (mWO-2), or both (mWO-3). The pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated using a bivariate random-effects model. Study heterogeneity was explored by subgroup analysis and meta-regression analysis. RESULTS Ten comparative studies with 2391 patients were included. Compared to cWO, the overall mWO yielded significantly higher sensitivity (71% vs. 81%, p = 0.00) and lower specificity (97% vs. 93%, p = 0.01) for diagnosing HCC. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.90 and 0.94 for the cWO and mWO, respectively. Regarding the three types of mWOs, mWO-2 showed the highest sensitivity (85%) and specificity (96%) for diagnosing HCC. mWO-2 achieved the highest AUC (0.97), followed by mWO-1 (0.90), and mWO-3 (0.89). Average reviewer experience and scanner field strength were significantly associated with study heterogeneity (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Inclusion of TP and HBP hypointensity in the definition of washout improved the sensitivity with slightly lower specificity for diagnosing HCC in LI-RADS. KEY POINTS • Compared to the conventional definition of washout, studies using a modified definition had higher sensitivity (71% vs. 81%) but lower specificity (97% vs. 93%) in LI-RADS for the diagnosis of HCC. • Hepatobiliary phase hypointensity may be a preferred alternative washout for HCC diagnosis with the highest area under the curve. • Studies with experienced reviewer or 3.0T MRI showed higher sensitivity and lower specificity for diagnosing HCC when using modified washout (p < 0.05).
Collapse
|
47
|
Zheng W, Huang H, She D, Xiong M, Chen X, Lin X, Cao D. Added-value of ancillary imaging features for differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma from intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma on Gd-BOPTA-enhanced MRI in LI-RADS M. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2022; 47:957-968. [PMID: 34964069 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03380-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2021] [Revised: 12/05/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify the reliable imaging features and added-value of ancillary imaging features for differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma (IMCC) assigned to LI-RADS M on Gd-BOPTA-enhanced MRI. METHODS This retrospective study included 116 liver observations assigned to LI-RADS M, including 82 HCC and 34 IMCC histologically confirmed. Before and after adding ancillary imaging features, all variables with a p-value of < 0.05 in univariable analysis were entered into a multivariable logistic regression analysis to build diagnostic model 1 and model 2 to find reliable predictors of HCC diagnosis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and the DeLong test were used to compare the two models. RESULTS Forty-nine of 82(59.8%) HCCs had a considerably higher frequency of enhancing "capsule" compared with IMCCs (p < 0.001). Based on LI-RADS major and LR-M features and clinical-pathologic factors, an elevated AFP level (OR = 10.676, 95%CI = 2.125-4.470, p = 0.004) and enhancing "capsule" (OR = 20.558, 95%CI = 4.470-94.550, p < 0.001) were extracted as independent risk factors in Model 1. After adding ancillary imaging features, Male (OR = 23.452, 95%CI = 1.465-375.404, p = 0.026), enhancing "capsule" (OR = 13.161, 95%CI = 1.725-100.400, p = 0.013), septum (OR = 17.983, 95%CI = 1.049-308.181, p = 0.046), small-scale central HBP hyperintensity (OR = 44.386, 95%CI = 1.610-1223.484, p = 0.025) were confirmed as independent significant variables associated with HCC. Model 2 demonstrated significantly superior AUC (0.918 vs 0.845, p = 0.021) compared with Model 1. When any two or more predictors in model 2 were satisfied, sensitivity was 91.46%, and accuracy was at the top (87.93%). CONCLUSION Enhancing "capsule" was a reliable imaging feature to help identify HCC. Adding ancillary imaging features improved sensitivity and accuracy for HCC diagnosis with differentiation from IMCC in LR-M.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wanjing Zheng
- Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350005, Fujian, China
| | - Hongjie Huang
- Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350005, Fujian, China
| | - Dejun She
- Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350005, Fujian, China
| | - Meilian Xiong
- Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350005, Fujian, China
| | - Xiaodan Chen
- Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350005, Fujian, China
| | - Xiaojun Lin
- Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350005, Fujian, China
| | - Dairong Cao
- Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350005, Fujian, China.
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Cancer, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fujian, China.
- Key Laboratory of Radiation Biology of Fujian Higher Education Institutions, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fujian, China.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Zhong X, Tang H, Guan T, Lu B, Zhang C, Tang D, Li J, Cui S. Added Value of Quantitative Apparent Diffusion Coefficients for Identifying Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma from Benign Nodule Categorized as LI-RADS 3 and 4 in Cirrhosis. J Clin Transl Hepatol 2022; 10:34-41. [PMID: 35233371 PMCID: PMC8845165 DOI: 10.14218/jcth.2021.00053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Revised: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Correct identification of small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) and benign nodules in cirrhosis remains challenging, quantitative apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) have shown potential value in characterization of benign and malignant liver lesions. We aimed to explore the added value of ADCs in the identification of small (≤3 cm) HCCs and benign nodules categorized as Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) 3 (LR-3) and 4 (LR-4) in cirrhosis. METHODS Ninety-seven cirrhosis patients with 109 small nodules (70 HCCs, 39 benign nodules) of LR-3 and 4 LR-4 based on major and ancillary magnetic resonance imaging features were included. Multiparametric quantitative ADCs of the lesions, including the mean ADC (ADCmean), minimum ADC (ADCmin), maximal ADC (ADCmax), ADC standard deviation (ADCstd), and mean ADC value ratio of lesion-to-liver parenchyma (ADCratio) were calculated. Regarding the joint diagnosis, a nomogram model was plotted using multivariate logistic regression analysis. The performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS The ADCmean, ADCmin, ADCratio, and ADCstd were significantly associated with the identification of small HCC and benign nodules (p<0.001). For the joint diagnosis, the LI-RADS category (odds ratio [OR]=12.50), ADCmin (OR=0.14), and ADCratio (OR=0.12) were identified as independent factors for distinguishing HCCs from benign nodules. The joint nomogram model showed good calibration and discrimination, with a C-index of 0.947. Compared with the LI-RADS category alone, this nomogram model demonstrated a significant improvement in diagnostic performance, with AUC increasing from 0.820 to 0.967 (p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS The addition of quantitative ADCs could improve the identification of small HCC and benign nodules categorized as LR-3 and 4 LR-4 in patients with cirrhosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xi Zhong
- Department of Medical Imaging, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Hongsheng Tang
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Tianpei Guan
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Bingui Lu
- Department of Medical Imaging, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Chuangjia Zhang
- Department of Medical Imaging, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Danlei Tang
- Department of Medical Imaging, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Jiansheng Li
- Department of Medical Imaging, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Correspondence to: Shuzhong Cui, Department of Abdominal Surgery, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510095, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2178-8741. Tel/Fax: +86-20-6667-3666, E-mail: ; Jiansheng Li, Department of Medical Imaging, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510095, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8144-3430. Tel/Fax: +86-20-6667-3636, E-mail:
| | - Shuzhong Cui
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Correspondence to: Shuzhong Cui, Department of Abdominal Surgery, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510095, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2178-8741. Tel/Fax: +86-20-6667-3666, E-mail: ; Jiansheng Li, Department of Medical Imaging, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510095, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8144-3430. Tel/Fax: +86-20-6667-3636, E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Wu H, Wang Z, Liang Y, Tan C, Wei X, Zhang W, Yang R, Mo L, Jiang X. A Computed Tomography Nomogram for Assessing the Malignancy Risk of Focal Liver Lesions in Patients With Cirrhosis: A Preliminary Study. Front Oncol 2022; 11:681489. [PMID: 35127463 PMCID: PMC8814623 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.681489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The detection and characterization of focal liver lesions (FLLs) in patients with cirrhosis is challenging. Accurate information about FLLs is key to their management, which can range from conservative methods to surgical excision. We sought to develop a nomogram that incorporates clinical risk factors, blood indicators, and enhanced computed tomography (CT) imaging findings to predict the nature of FLLs in cirrhotic livers. Method A total of 348 surgically confirmed FLLs were included. CT findings and clinical data were assessed. All factors with P < 0.05 in univariate analysis were included in multivariate analysis. ROC analysis was performed, and a nomogram was constructed based on the multivariate logistic regression analysis results. Results The FLLs were either benign (n = 79) or malignant (n = 269). Logistic regression evaluated independent factors that positively affected malignancy. AFP (OR = 10.547), arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) (OR = 740.876), washout (OR = 0.028), satellite lesions (OR = 15.164), ascites (OR = 156.241), and nodule-in-nodule architecture (OR =27.401) were independent predictors of malignancy. The combined predictors had excellent performance in differentiating benign and malignant lesions, with an AUC of 0.959, a sensitivity of 95.24%, and a specificity of 87.5% in the training cohort and AUC of 0.981, sensitivity of 94.74%, and specificity of 93.33% in the test cohort. The C-index was 96.80%, and calibration curves showed good agreement between the nomogram predictions and the actual data. Conclusions The nomogram showed excellent discrimination and calibration for malignancy risk prediction, and it may aid in making FLLs treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongzhen Wu
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zihua Wang
- Department of Radiology, Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Foshan, China
| | - Yingying Liang
- Department of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Caihong Tan
- Department of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xinhua Wei
- Department of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wanli Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ruimeng Yang
- Department of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lei Mo
- Department of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xinqing Jiang
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Radiology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Vogl TJ, Mader C, Michalik S, Hammerstingl R, Koch V. [Small hepatocellular carcinoma : Diagnostics according to guidelines and established in the clinical setting]. Radiologe 2022; 62:239-246. [PMID: 35037980 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-021-00965-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE The diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)-especially the characterization of small lesions <2 cm-continues to be a radiological challenge. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS In the current S3 guideline on diagnosis and therapy of HCC, contrast-enhanced imaging examinations, such as contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), are still the diagnostic standard. METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS HCC in the cirrhotic liver should be diagnosed by its typical contrast-enhanced pattern in the MRI. In addition, the use of quality assurance instruments such as LI-RADS (Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System) contributes to the desired consistency of findings, even with small ambiguous findings. PERFORMANCE Many studies have shown that the LI-RADS classification reflects the likelihood of HCC and other malignant liver lesions. ACHIEVEMENTS Guidelines and quality assurance instruments contribute to a more precise diagnosis in patients with suspected HCC. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS A guideline-compliant diagnostic algorithm and the LI-RADS should be used across the board for accurate HCC diagnostics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas J Vogl
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universität, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland.
| | - Christoph Mader
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universität, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland
| | - Sabine Michalik
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universität, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland
| | - Renate Hammerstingl
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universität, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland
| | - Vitali Koch
- Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universität, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|