• MapCHECK 2
• MapCHECK 3
• correction
• dose rate dependence
• dose verification

• Humans
• Radiotherapy Dosage
• Calibration
• Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods
• Algorithms
• Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods
• Radiometry/methods
• Radiometry/instrumentation
• Particle Accelerators/instrumentation
• Phantoms, Imaging

• Computer-Assisted
• Electronic Portal Imaging Device
• Photons
• Radiation Dosimetry
• Radiotherapy Planning
• Small Field

• MR-guided RT
• adaptive radiotherapy (RT)
• inter- and intrafractional motion
• polymer gel dosimetry
• proton and ion beam RT
• verification of 3D dose distributions

• Polymers
• Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods
• Radiotherapy Dosage
• Radiotherapy, Conformal/methods
• Radiometry/methods

• Field output factor
• Monte Carlo simulation
• Robotic radiotherapy/radiosurgery
• Small field dosimetry

The purpose of this study is to establish and assess a practical delivery quality assurance method for stereotactic radiosurgery with Cyberknife by analyzing the geometric and dosimetric accuracies obtained using a PTW31016 PinPoint ionization chamber and EBT3 films. Moreover, this study also explores the relationship between the parameters of plan complexity, target volume, and deliverability parameters and provides a valuable reference for improving plan optimization and validation.

One hundred fifty cases of delivery quality assurance plans were performed on Cyberknife to assess point dose and planar dose distribution, respectively, using a PTW31016 PinPoint ionization chamber and Gafchromic EBT3 films. The measured chamber doses were compared with the planned mean doses in the sensitive volume of the chamber, and the measured planar doses were compared with the calculated dose distribution using gamma index analysis. The gamma passing rates were evaluated using the criteria of 3%/1 mm and 2%/2 mm. The statistical significance of the correlations between the complexity metrics, target volume, and the gamma passing rate were analyzed using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient.

For point dose comparison, the averaged dose differences (± standard deviations) were 1.6 ± 0.73% for all the cases. For planar dose distribution, the mean gamma passing rate for 3%/1 mm, and 2%/2 mm evaluation criteria were 94.26% ± 1.89%, and 93.86% ± 2.16%, respectively. The gamma passing rates were higher than 90% for all the delivery quality assurance plans with the criteria of 3%/1 mm and 2%/2 mm. The difference in point dose was lowly correlated with volume of PTV, number of beams, and treatment time for 150 DQA plans, and highly correlated with volume of PTV for 18 DQA plans of small target. DQA gamma passing rate (2%/2 mm) was a moderate significant correlation for the number of nodes, number of beams and treatment time, and a low correlation with MU.

PTW31016 PinPoint ionization chamber and EBT3 film can be used for routine Cyberknife delivery quality assurance. The point dose difference should be within 3%. The gamma passing rate should be higher than 90% for the criteria of 3%/1 mm and 2%/2 mm. In addition, the plan complexity and PTV volume were found to have some influence on the plan deliverability.

• Cyberknife
• EBT3 film
• delivery quality assurance
• ionization chamber
• small field

• Dosimetry
• Fricke gel
• Linac
• Stereotactic radiosurgery

• Angular dependence
• Patient-specific quality assurance
• Silicon diode detector
• Stereotactic radiosurgery quality assurance

• Heterogeneity
• MAGIC polymer Gel
• Penumbra
• Small field

• Dosimetry
• Electron beam
• Energy
• Output factor
• Penumbra
• Small field

The purpose of this work was to examine the suitability of VIPAR^nd polymer gel–9.4 T magnetic resonance microimaging system for high spatial resolution dose distribution measurements.

The VIPAR^nd samples (3 cm in outside diameter and 12 cm in height) were exposed to ionizing radiation by using a linear accelerator (Varian TrueBeam, USA; 6 MV x‐ray beam). In the calibration stage, nine gel dosimeter vials were irradiated in a water phantom homogenously to the doses from 1.5 to 30 Gy in order to obtain R2‒dose relation. In the verification stage, two gel dosimeter vials were irradiated in the half beam penumbra area of 10 × 10 cm radiation field using the amount of monitor units appropriate to deliver 20 Gy at the field center. The gels were imaged on a vertical 9.4 T magnetic resonance (MR) microimaging scanner using single slice and multislice (9 slices) multiecho (90 × 7 ms) sequences at the spatial resolutions of 0.2–0.4 × 0.2–0.4 × 3 mm³ and 0.2–0.4 × 0.2–0.4 × 1 mm³ respectively. The gels were subjected to microimaging during the period of two weeks after irradiation. The reference data consisted of the dose profiles measured using the diode dosimetry, radiochromic film, ionization chamber, and the water phantom system.

The VIPAR^nd‒9.4 T MR microimaging system was characterized by the dose sensitivity of 0.067 ± 0.002 Gy⁻¹ s⁻¹ at day 3 after irradiation. The dose resolution at 10 Gy (at P = 95%) was equal to 0.42 Gy at day 3 after irradiation using a single slice sequence (0.2 × 0.2 × 3 mm³) and 2.0 Gy at day 4 after irradiation using a multislice sequence (0.2 × 0.2 × 1 mm³) for one signal acquisition (measurement time: 15 min). These values were improved by ~1.4‐fold when using four signal acquisitions in the single slice sequence, and by ~2.78‐fold for 12 signal acquisitions in the multislice sequence. Furthermore, decreasing the in‐plane resolution from 0.2 × 0.2 mm² to 0.4 × 0.4 mm² resulted in a dose resolution of 0.3 Gy and 1 Gy at 10 Gy (at P = 95%) for one signal acquisition in the single slice and multislice sequences respectively (measurement time: 7.5 min).

As reveals from the gamma index analysis the dose distributions measured at days 3–4 postirradiation using both VIPAR^nd verification phantoms agree with the data obtained using a silicon diode, assuming 1 mm/5% criterion. A good interphantom reproducibility of the polymer gel dosimetry was proved by monitoring of two phantoms up to 10 days after irradiation. However, the agreement between the dose distributions measured using the diode and polymer gel started to get worse from day 5 after irradiation.

The VIPAR^nd–9.4T MR microimaging system allows to obtain dose resolution of 0.42 Gy at 10 Gy (at P = 95%) for a spatial resolution of 0.2 × 0.2 × 3 mm³ (acquisition time: 15 min). Further studies are required to improve a temporal stability of the gel‐derived dose distribution.

• 3D polymer gel dosimetry
• VIP
• VIPARnd
• high-field MRI
• microimaging

The aim of this work was to evaluate the use of an angularly independent silicon detector (edgeless diodes) developed for dosimetry in megavoltage radiotherapy for Cyberknife in a phantom and for patient quality assurance (QA).

The characterization of the edgeless diodes has been performed on Cyberknife with fixed and IRIS collimators. The edgeless diode probes were tested in terms of basic QA parameters such as measurements of tissue‐phantom ratio (TPR), output factor and off‐axis ratio. The measurements were performed in both water and water‐equivalent phantoms. In addition, three patient‐specific plans have been delivered to a lung phantom with and without motion and dose measurements have been performed to verify the ability of the diodes to work as patient‐specific QA devices. The data obtained by the edgeless diodes have been compared to PTW 60016, SN edge, PinPoint ionization chamber, Gafchromic EBT3 film, and treatment planning system (TPS).

The TPR measurement performed by the edgeless diodes show agreement within 2.2% with data obtained with PTW 60016 diode for all the field sizes. Output factor agrees within 2.6% with that measured by SN EDGE diodes corrected for their field size dependence. The beam profiles’ measurements of edgeless diodes match SN EDGE diodes with a measured full width half maximum (FWHM) within 2.3% and penumbra widths within 0.148 mm. Patient‐specific QA measurements demonstrate an agreement within 4.72% in comparison with TPS.

The edgeless diodes have been proved to be an excellent candidate for machine and patient QA for Cyberknife reproducing commercial dosimetry device measurements without need of angular dependence corrections. However, further investigation is required to evaluate the effect of their dose rate dependence on complex brain cancer dose verification.

• angular dependence
• cyberknife
• silicon detector
• small field dosimetry
• stereotactic radiosurgery

The challenges of accurate dosimetry for stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) with small unflattened radiation fields have been widely reported in the literature. In this case, suitable dosimeters would have to offer a submillimeter spatial resolution. The CyberKnife^® (Accuray Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) is an SRT‐dedicated linear accelerator (linac), which can deliver treatments with submillimeter positional accuracy using circular fields. Beams are delivered with the desired field size using fixed cones, the InCise™ multileaf collimator or a dynamic variable‐aperture Iris™ collimator. The latter, allowing for field sizes to be varied during treatment delivery, has the potential to decrease treatment time, but its reproducibility in terms of output factors (OFs) and dose profiles (DPs) needs to be verified.

A 2D monolithic silicon array detector, the “Octa”, was evaluated for dosimetric quality assurance (QA) for a CyberKnife system. OFs, DPs, percentage depth‐dose (PDD) and tissue maximum ratio (TMR) were investigated, and results were benchmarked against the PTW SRS diode. Cross‐plane, in‐plane and 2 diagonal dose profiles were measured simultaneously with high spatial resolution (0.3 mm). Monte Carlo (MC) simulations with a GEANT4 (GEometry ANd Tracking 4) tool‐kit were added to the study to support the experimental characterization of the detector response.

For fixed cones and the Iris, for all field sizes investigated in the range between 5 and 60 mm diameter, OFs, PDDs, TMRs, and DPs in terms of FWHM measured by the Octa were accurate within 3% when benchmarked against the SRS diode and MC calculations.

The Octa was shown to be an accurate dosimeter for measurements with a 6 MV FFF beam delivered with a CyberKnife system. The detector enabled real‐time dosimetric verification for the variable aperture Iris collimator, yielding OFs and DPs consistent with those obtained with alternative methods.

• SRT
• 2D monolithic silicon array detector
• CyberKnife
• quality assurance
• small-field dosimetry

• Detector
• dosimeter
• radiotherapy
• small field dosimetry

Radiation treatments delivered with real‐time multileaf collimator (MLC) tracking currently lack fast pretreatment or real‐time quality assurance. The purpose of this study is to test a 2D silicon detector, MagicPlate‐512 (MP512), in a complex clinical environment involving real‐time reconfiguration of the MLC leaves during target tracking.

MP512 was placed in the center of a solid water phantom and mounted on a motion platform used to simulate three different patient motions. Electromagnetic target tracking was implemented using the Calypso system (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and an MLC tracking software. A two‐arc VMAT plan was delivered and 2D dose distributions were reconstructed by MP512, EBT3 film, and the Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS). Dose maps were compared using gamma analysis with 2%/2 mm and 3%/3 mm acceptance criteria. Dose profiles were generated in sup‐inf and lateral directions to show the agreement of MP512 to EBT3 and to highlight the efficacy of the MLC tracking system in mitigating the effect of the simulated patient motion.

Using a 3%/3 mm acceptance criterion for 2D gamma analysis, MP512 to EBT3 film agreement was 99% and MP512 to TPS agreement was 100%. For a 2%/2 mm criterion, the agreement was 95% and 98%, respectively. Full width at half maximum and 80%/20% penumbral width of the MP512 and EBT3 dose profiles agreed within 1 mm and 0.5 mm, respectively. Patient motion increased the measured dose profile penumbral width by nearly 2 mm (with respect to the no‐motion case); however, the MLC tracking strategy was able to mitigate 80% of this effect.

MP512 is capable of high spatial resolution 2D dose reconstruction during adaptive MLC tracking, including arc deliveries. It shows potential as an effective tool for 2D small field dosimetry and pretreatment quality assurance for MLC tracking modalities. These results provide confidence that detector‐based pretreatment dosimetry is clinically feasible despite fast real‐time MLC reconfigurations.

• 2D silicon array
• MLC tracking
• QA of adaptive radiotherapy
• small field dosimetry

• Patient dose verification
• Scintillator
• Small fields
• Stereotactic radiotherapy

With the advent of state-of-the-art treatment technologies, the use of small fields has increased, and dosimetry in small fields is highly challenging. In this study, the potential use of Varian electronic portal imaging device (EPID) for small field measurements was explored for 6 and 15 MV photon beams.

The output factors and profiles were measured for a range of jaw-collimated square field sizes starting from 0.8 cm × 0.8 cm to 10 cm × 10 cm using EPID. For evaluation purpose, reference data were acquired using Exradin A16 microionization chamber (0.007 cc) for output factors and stereotactic field diode for profile measurements in a radiation field analyzer.

The output factors of EPID were in agreement with the reference data for field sizes down to 2 cm × 2 cm and for 2 cm × 2 cm; the difference in output factors was +2.06% for 6 MV and +1.56% for 15 MV. For the lowest field size studied (0.8 cm × 0.8 cm), the differences were maximum; +16% for 6 MV and +23% for 15 MV photon beam. EPID profiles of both energies were closely matching with reference profiles for field sizes down to 2 cm × 2 cm; however, penumbra and measured field size of EPID profiles were slightly lower compared to its counterpart.

EPID is a viable option for profile and output factor measurements for field sizes down to 2 cm × 2 cm in the absence of appropriate small field dosimeters.

• Dosimetry
• electronic portal imaging device
• portal dosimetry
• small field dosimetry

• Magnetic resonance imaging
• Optical computed tomography
• Polymer gel
• Solid radiochromic polymer
• Three-dimensional dose measurement

An automatic brain‐metastases planning (ABMP) software has been installed in our institution. It is dedicated for treating multiple brain metastases with radiosurgery on linear accelerators (linacs) using a single‐setup isocenter with noncoplanar dynamic conformal arcs. This study is to validate the calculated absolute dose and dose distribution of ABMP. Three types of measurements were performed to validate the planning software: 1, dual micro ion chambers were used with an acrylic phantom to measure the absolute dose; 2, a 3D cylindrical phantom with dual diode array was used to evaluate 2D dose distribution and point dose for smaller targets; and 3, a 3D pseudo‐in vivo patient‐specific phantom filled with polymer gels was used to evaluate the accuracy of 3D dose distribution and radiation delivery. Micro chamber measurement of two targets (volumes of 1.2 cc and 0.9 cc, respectively) showed that the percentage differences of the absolute dose at both targets were less than 1%. Averaged GI passing rate of five different plans measured with the diode array phantom was above 98%, using criteria of 3% dose difference, 1 mm distance to agreement (DTA), and 10% low‐dose threshold. 3D gel phantom measurement results demonstrated a 3D displacement of nine targets of 0.7±0.4 mm (range 0.2 ~ 1.1 mm). The averaged two‐dimensional (2D) GI passing rate for several region of interests (ROI) on axial slices that encompass each one of the nine targets was above 98% (5% dose difference, 2 mm DTA, and 10% low‐dose threshold). Measured D95, the minimum dose that covers 95% of the target volume, of the nine targets was 0.7% less than the calculated D95. Three different types of dosimetric verification methods were used and proved the dose calculation of the new automatic brain metastases planning (ABMP) software was clinical acceptable. The 3D pseudo‐in vivo patient‐specific gel phantom test also served as an end‐to‐end test for validating not only the dose calculation, but the treatment delivery accuracy as well.

PACS number(s): 87.53.Lv, 87.55.km, 87.55.Qr

The advent of modern technologies in radiotherapy poses an increased challenge in the determination of dosimetric parameters of small fields that exhibit a high degree of uncertainty. Percent depth dose and beam profiles were acquired using different detectors in two different orientations. The parameters such as relative surface dose (D_S), depth of dose maximum (D_max), percentage dose at 10 cm (D₁₀), penumbral width, flatness, and symmetry were evaluated with different detectors. The dosimetric data were acquired for fields defined by jaws alone, multileaf collimator (MLC) alone, and by MLC while the jaws were positioned at 0, 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 cm away from MLC leaf-end using a Varian linear accelerator with 6 MV photon beam. The accuracy in the measurement of dosimetric parameters with various detectors for three different field definitions was evaluated. The relative D_S(38.1%) with photon field diode in parallel orientation was higher than electron field diode (EFD) (27.9%) values for 1 cm ×1 cm field. An overestimation of 5.7% and 8.6% in D₁₀ depth were observed for 1 cm ×1 cm field with RK ion chamber in parallel and perpendicular orientation, respectively, for the fields defined by MLC while jaw positioned at the edge of the field when compared to EFD values in parallel orientation. For this field definition, the in-plane penumbral widths obtained with ion chamber in parallel and perpendicular orientation were 3.9 mm, 5.6 mm for 1 cm ×1 cm field, respectively. Among all detectors used in the study, the unshielded diodes were found to be an appropriate choice of detector for the measurement of beam parameters in small fields.

• Beam profile
• detector orientation
• penumbra
• percent depth dose
• small field dosimetry

• Monte Carlo
• dosimetry
• microbeam radiation therapy

This work illustrates a procedure to assess the overall accuracy associated with Gamma Knife treatment planning using plugging. The main role of source plugging or blocking is to create dose falloff in the junction between a target and a critical structure. We report the use of MAGAT gel dosimeter for verification of an experimental treatment plan based on plugging. The polymer gel contained in a head‐sized glass container simulated all major aspects of the treatment process of Gamma Knife radiosurgery. The 3D dose distribution recorded in the gel dosimeter was read using a 1.5T MRI scanner. Scanning protocol was: CPMG pulse sequence with 8 equidistant echoes, TR=7 s, echo step=14 ms, pixel size=0.5 mm x 0.5 mm, and slice thickness of 2 mm. Using a calibration relationship between absorbed dose and spin‐spin relaxation rate (R2), we converted R2 images to dose images. Volumetric dose comparison between treatment planning system (TPS) and gel measurement was accomplished using an in‐house MATLAB‐based program. The isodose overlay of the measured and computed dose distribution on axial planes was in close agreement. Gamma index analysis of 3D data showed more than 94% voxel pass rate for different tolerance criteria of 3%/2 mm, 3%/1 mm and 2%/2 mm. Film dosimetry with GAFCHROMIC EBT 2 film was also performed to compare the results with the calculated TPS dose. Gamma index analysis of film measurement for the same tolerance criteria used for gel measurement evaluation showed more than 95% voxel pass rate. Verification of gamma plan calculated dose on account of shield is not part of acceptance testing of Leksell Gamma Knife (LGK). Through this study we accomplished a volumetric comparison of dose distributions measured with a polymer gel dosimeter and Leksell GammaPlan (LGP) calculations for plans using plugging. We propose gel dosimeter as a quality assurance (QA) tool for verification of plug‐based planning.

PACS number: 87.53.Ly, 87.55.‐x, 87.56.N‐

• flattening filter free
• ion recombination
• two‐voltage technique
• pion
• ionization chamber

• Filtration/instrumentation
• Humans
• Ions
• Particle Accelerators/instrumentation
• Phantoms, Imaging
• Photons
• Radiotherapy Dosage
• Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
• X-Rays