Reference Citation Analysis: Find an Article, Find a Category, Find a Journal, Find a Scholar

For: Perniola G, Shek C, Chong CCW, Chew S, Cartmill J, Dietz HP. Defecation proctography and translabial ultrasound in the investigation of defecatory disorders. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;31:567-571. [PMID: 18409183 DOI: 10.1002/uog.5337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]

For:	Perniola G, Shek C, Chong CCW, Chew S, Cartmill J, Dietz HP. Defecation proctography and translabial ultrasound in the investigation of defecatory disorders. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;31:567-571. [PMID: 18409183 DOI: 10.1002/uog.5337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]

Number

Cited by Other Article(s)

Ralston C, Reena M, Solanki D, Morris S, Schizas AMP, Williams AB, Hainsworth AJ. Can we use integrated total pelvic floor ultrasound as a screening tool in defaecatory pelvic floor dysfunction? A prospective evaluation of the accuracy of integrated total pelvic floor ultrasound compared with defaecation proctography. Colorectal Dis 2025;27:e17274. [PMID: 39948825 DOI: 10.1111/codi.17274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2024] [Revised: 09/26/2024] [Accepted: 10/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/09/2025]

Abstract

AIM

Pelvic floor dysfunction is common and includes symptoms such as urinary incontinence, pelvic pain, faecal incontinence, obstructive defaecation syndrome symptoms and pelvic organ prolapse. It is investigated with defaecation proctography (DP) and integrated total pelvic floor ultrasound (TPFUS). Whilst DP is currently the gold standard, TPFUS is efficient and less invasive, offering additional sphincter function assessment. This study aimed to compare TPFUS accuracy to DP in the evaluation of pelvic floor dysfunction.

METHODS

From 2015 to 2016, a prospective observational study was conducted at Guy's and St Thomas's Foundation Trust. Symptomatic women with incomplete evacuation were consecutively invited to participate. Patients underwent three scans using both TPFUS and DP. Reports were independently verified by a blinded consultant. Sensitivity, specificity and agreement were calculated for anatomical (rectocele, intussusception, enterocele, cystocele) and functional (coordination, evacuation) features.

RESULTS

A total of 216 patients were included. Moderate agreement was seen between DP and TPFUS in prediction of rectoceles (positive predictive value 85%, negative predictive value 67%, Cohen's kappa 0.46) and on the evaluation of dimensions of rectoceles (R coefficient 0.55) (P < 0.0001). Fair agreement was seen in the assessment of propulsion (positive predictive value 76%, negative predictive value 50%, Cohen's kappa 0.25). Poor agreement was observed on other anatomical and functional objectives.

CONCLUSION

This is the most extensive prospective comparison of these imaging modalities. While there is limited correlation between DP and TPFUS in exploring anatomical and functional aspects of pelvic floor disorders, TPFUS proves to be an effective screening tool. With enhanced expertise and confidence in its use, TPFUS could potentially guide surgical planning rather than solely identifying those needing DP.

Collapse

Yamamoto A, Kessoku T, Ogata T, Jono T, Takahashi K, Tanaka K, Suzuki K, Takeda Y, Ozaki A, Kasai Y, Okubo N, Iwaki M, Kobayashi T, Misawa N, Yoshihara T, Suzuki A, Fuyuki A, Hasegawa S, Imajo K, Kobayashi N, Matsumoto M, Tamai N, Sanada H, Oyamada S, Ichikawa Y, Nakajima A. A Handheld Ultrasound Device Can Predict Constipation with Rectal Fecal Retention in a Palliative Care Setting. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024;14:1626. [PMID: 39125503 PMCID: PMC11311552 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14151626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2024] [Revised: 07/14/2024] [Accepted: 07/26/2024] [Indexed: 08/12/2024] Open

Affiliation(s)

Atsushi Yamamoto Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan; (A.Y.); (T.O.); (T.J.); (K.T.); (K.T.); (K.S.); (A.O.); (Y.K.); (N.O.); (M.I.); (T.K.); (N.M.); (T.Y.); (A.S.); (A.F.); (S.H.); (K.I.); (A.N.) Department of Gastroenterology, Fujisawa Syonandai Hospital, Fujisawa 252-0802, Japan
Takaomi Kessoku Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan; (A.Y.); (T.O.); (T.J.); (K.T.); (K.T.); (K.S.); (A.O.); (Y.K.); (N.O.); (M.I.); (T.K.); (N.M.); (T.Y.); (A.S.); (A.F.); (S.H.); (K.I.); (A.N.) Department of Palliative Medicine, International University Health and Welfare, Narita Hospital, Narita 286-8520, Japan Department of Gastroenterology, International University Health and Welfare, Narita Hospital, Narita 286-8520, Japan
Tomoki Ogata Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan; (A.Y.); (T.O.); (T.J.); (K.T.); (K.T.); (K.S.); (A.O.); (Y.K.); (N.O.); (M.I.); (T.K.); (N.M.); (T.Y.); (A.S.); (A.F.); (S.H.); (K.I.); (A.N.)
Tsumugi Jono Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan; (A.Y.); (T.O.); (T.J.); (K.T.); (K.T.); (K.S.); (A.O.); (Y.K.); (N.O.); (M.I.); (T.K.); (N.M.); (T.Y.); (A.S.); (A.F.); (S.H.); (K.I.); (A.N.)
Kota Takahashi Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan; (A.Y.); (T.O.); (T.J.); (K.T.); (K.T.); (K.S.); (A.O.); (Y.K.); (N.O.); (M.I.); (T.K.); (N.M.); (T.Y.); (A.S.); (A.F.); (S.H.); (K.I.); (A.N.) Department of Gastroenterology, Yokosuka General Hospital Uwamachi, Yokosuka 238-0017, Japan
Kosuke Tanaka Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan; (A.Y.); (T.O.); (T.J.); (K.T.); (K.T.); (K.S.); (A.O.); (Y.K.); (N.O.); (M.I.); (T.K.); (N.M.); (T.Y.); (A.S.); (A.F.); (S.H.); (K.I.); (A.N.) Department of Palliative Medicine, International University Health and Welfare, Narita Hospital, Narita 286-8520, Japan Department of Gastroenterology, International University Health and Welfare, Narita Hospital, Narita 286-8520, Japan
Ko Suzuki Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan; (A.Y.); (T.O.); (T.J.); (K.T.); (K.T.); (K.S.); (A.O.); (Y.K.); (N.O.); (M.I.); (T.K.); (N.M.); (T.Y.); (A.S.); (A.F.); (S.H.); (K.I.); (A.N.)
Yuma Takeda Department of Palliative Medicine, Yokohama City University, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan; (Y.T.); (Y.I.)
Anna Ozaki Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan; (A.Y.); (T.O.); (T.J.); (K.T.); (K.T.); (K.S.); (A.O.); (Y.K.); (N.O.); (M.I.); (T.K.); (N.M.); (T.Y.); (A.S.); (A.F.); (S.H.); (K.I.); (A.N.)
Yuki Kasai Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan; (A.Y.); (T.O.); (T.J.); (K.T.); (K.T.); (K.S.); (A.O.); (Y.K.); (N.O.); (M.I.); (T.K.); (N.M.); (T.Y.); (A.S.); (A.F.); (S.H.); (K.I.); (A.N.)
Naoki Okubo Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan; (A.Y.); (T.O.); (T.J.); (K.T.); (K.T.); (K.S.); (A.O.); (Y.K.); (N.O.); (M.I.); (T.K.); (N.M.); (T.Y.); (A.S.); (A.F.); (S.H.); (K.I.); (A.N.) Department of Oncology, Yokohama City University, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan;
Michihiro Iwaki Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan; (A.Y.); (T.O.); (T.J.); (K.T.); (K.T.); (K.S.); (A.O.); (Y.K.); (N.O.); (M.I.); (T.K.); (N.M.); (T.Y.); (A.S.); (A.F.); (S.H.); (K.I.); (A.N.)
Takashi Kobayashi Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan; (A.Y.); (T.O.); (T.J.); (K.T.); (K.T.); (K.S.); (A.O.); (Y.K.); (N.O.); (M.I.); (T.K.); (N.M.); (T.Y.); (A.S.); (A.F.); (S.H.); (K.I.); (A.N.)
Noboru Misawa Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan; (A.Y.); (T.O.); (T.J.); (K.T.); (K.T.); (K.S.); (A.O.); (Y.K.); (N.O.); (M.I.); (T.K.); (N.M.); (T.Y.); (A.S.); (A.F.); (S.H.); (K.I.); (A.N.)
Tsutomu Yoshihara Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan; (A.Y.); (T.O.); (T.J.); (K.T.); (K.T.); (K.S.); (A.O.); (Y.K.); (N.O.); (M.I.); (T.K.); (N.M.); (T.Y.); (A.S.); (A.F.); (S.H.); (K.I.); (A.N.)
Akihiro Suzuki Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan; (A.Y.); (T.O.); (T.J.); (K.T.); (K.T.); (K.S.); (A.O.); (Y.K.); (N.O.); (M.I.); (T.K.); (N.M.); (T.Y.); (A.S.); (A.F.); (S.H.); (K.I.); (A.N.) Department of Oncology, Yokohama City University, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan;
Akiko Fuyuki Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan; (A.Y.); (T.O.); (T.J.); (K.T.); (K.T.); (K.S.); (A.O.); (Y.K.); (N.O.); (M.I.); (T.K.); (N.M.); (T.Y.); (A.S.); (A.F.); (S.H.); (K.I.); (A.N.) Department of Palliative Care, Shin-Yurigaoka General Hospital, Kawasaki 215-0026, Japan
Sho Hasegawa Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan; (A.Y.); (T.O.); (T.J.); (K.T.); (K.T.); (K.S.); (A.O.); (Y.K.); (N.O.); (M.I.); (T.K.); (N.M.); (T.Y.); (A.S.); (A.F.); (S.H.); (K.I.); (A.N.)
Kento Imajo Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan; (A.Y.); (T.O.); (T.J.); (K.T.); (K.T.); (K.S.); (A.O.); (Y.K.); (N.O.); (M.I.); (T.K.); (N.M.); (T.Y.); (A.S.); (A.F.); (S.H.); (K.I.); (A.N.) Department of Gastroenterology, Shin-Yurigaoka General Hospital, Kawasaki 215-0026, Japan
Noritoshi Kobayashi Department of Oncology, Yokohama City University, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan;
Masaru Matsumoto School of Nursing, Ishikawa Prefectural Nursing University, Kahoku 929-1210, Japan; (M.M.); (H.S.)
Nao Tamai Department of Nursing, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan;
Hiromi Sanada School of Nursing, Ishikawa Prefectural Nursing University, Kahoku 929-1210, Japan; (M.M.); (H.S.)
Shunsuke Oyamada Department of Biostatistics, JORTC Data Center, Tokyo 116-0013, Japan;
Yasushi Ichikawa Department of Palliative Medicine, Yokohama City University, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan; (Y.T.); (Y.I.) Department of Oncology, Yokohama City University, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan;
Atsushi Nakajima Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan; (A.Y.); (T.O.); (T.J.); (K.T.); (K.T.); (K.S.); (A.O.); (Y.K.); (N.O.); (M.I.); (T.K.); (N.M.); (T.Y.); (A.S.); (A.F.); (S.H.); (K.I.); (A.N.)

Collapse

Kessoku T, Matsumoto M, Misawa N, Tsuda M, Miura Y, Uchida A, Toriumi Y, Onodera T, Arima H, Kawamoto A, Sugama J, Matsushima M, Kato M, Manabe N, Tamai N, Sanada H, Nakajima A. Expert Consensus Document: An Algorithm for the Care and Treatment of Patients with Constipation Based on Ultrasonographic Findings in the Rectum. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024;14:1510. [PMID: 39061648 PMCID: PMC11276071 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14141510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2024] [Revised: 06/25/2024] [Accepted: 07/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open

Affiliation(s)

Takaomi Kessoku Department of Palliative Medicine and Gastroenterology, International University Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, 852, Hatakeda, Narita 286-0124, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology, International University Health and Welfare Graduate School of Medicine, 4-3, Kozunomori, Narita 286-0048, Japan Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan; Department of Internal Medicine, Yokohama Clinic, Kanagawa Dental University, 3-31-6 Tsuruya-cho, Kanagawa, Yokohama 221-0835, Japan
Masaru Matsumoto School of Nursing, Ishikawa Prefectural Nursing University, 1-1 Gakuendai, Kahoku 929-1210, Japan; (M.M.); (H.S.)
Noboru Misawa Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan;
Momoko Tsuda Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Hakodate National Hospital, 18-16, Kawahara-cho, Hakodate 041-8512, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology, Sapporo Cancer Screening Center, Public Interest Foundation Hokkaido Cancer Society, 1-15, Kita-26 Higashi-14, Higashi-ku, Sapporo 065-0026, Japan;
Yuka Miura Research Center for Implementation Nursing Science Initiative, Fujita Health University, Aichi 470-1192, Japan; (Y.M.); (J.S.)
Ayaka Uchida Department of Laboratory, Yokohama Clinic, Kanagawa Dental University, 3-31-6 Tsuruya-cho, Yokohama 221-0835, Japan; (A.U.); (Y.T.)
Yuki Toriumi Department of Laboratory, Yokohama Clinic, Kanagawa Dental University, 3-31-6 Tsuruya-cho, Yokohama 221-0835, Japan; (A.U.); (Y.T.)
Tomoyuki Onodera Department of Clinical Laboratory, National Hospital Organization Hakodate National Hospital, Hokkaido 041-8512, Japan;
Hiromi Arima Department of Radiological Technology, Coloproctology Center Takano Hospital, Kumamoto 862-0971, Japan;
Atsuo Kawamoto Division of Ultrasound and Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan;
Junko Sugama Research Center for Implementation Nursing Science Initiative, Fujita Health University, Aichi 470-1192, Japan; (Y.M.); (J.S.)
Makoto Matsushima Matsushima Hospital Proctology Center, 9-11, Honcho, Tobe, Nishi-Ward, Yokohama 220-0041, Japan;
Mototsugu Kato Department of Gastroenterology, Sapporo Cancer Screening Center, Public Interest Foundation Hokkaido Cancer Society, 1-15, Kita-26 Higashi-14, Higashi-ku, Sapporo 065-0026, Japan;
Noriaki Manabe Division of Endoscopy and Ultrasonography, Department of Clinical Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Kawasaki Medical School General Medical Center, Okayama 700-8505, Japan;
Nao Tamai Department of Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, Yokohama 236-0027, Japan;
Hiromi Sanada School of Nursing, Ishikawa Prefectural Nursing University, 1-1 Gakuendai, Kahoku 929-1210, Japan; (M.M.); (H.S.)
Atsushi Nakajima Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan;

Collapse

Taclob JA, Kalas MA, McCallum RW. Examining linaclotide for the treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2024;25:1281-1290. [PMID: 39058326 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2024.2386160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2024] [Revised: 07/18/2024] [Accepted: 07/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024]

Sano Y, Matsumoto M, Akiyama K, Urata K, Matsuzaka N, Tamai N, Miura Y, Sanada H. Evaluating Accuracy of Rectal Fecal Stool Assessment Using Transgluteal Cleft Approach Ultrasonography. Healthcare (Basel) 2024;12:1251. [PMID: 38998786 PMCID: PMC11241498 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12131251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2024] [Revised: 06/10/2024] [Accepted: 06/16/2024] [Indexed: 07/14/2024] Open

Affiliation(s)

Yumi Sano Department of Clinical Laboratory, Tokatsu Clinic Hospital, 865-2 Hinokuchi, Matsudo 2710067, Chiba, Japan
Masaru Matsumoto Department of Well-Being Nursing, Graduate School of Nursing, Ishikawa Prefectural Nursing University, 1-1 Gakuendai, Kahoku 9291210, Ishikawa, Japan Fomer Department of Imaging Nursing Science, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 1130033, Japan
Kazuhiro Akiyama Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tokatsu Clinic Hospital, 865-2 Hinokuchi, Matsudo 2710067, Chiba, Japan
Katsumi Urata Department of Nursing, Tokatsu Clinic Hospital, 865-2 Hinokuchi, Matsudo 2710067, Chiba, Japan
Natsuki Matsuzaka Department of Pharmacy, Tokatsu Clinic Hospital, 865-2 Hinokuchi, Matsudo 2710067, Chiba, Japan
Nao Tamai Fomer Department of Imaging Nursing Science, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 1130033, Japan Department of Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama 2360014, Kanagawa, Japan Former Global Nursing Research Center, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 1130033, Japan
Yuka Miura Fomer Department of Imaging Nursing Science, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 1130033, Japan Research Center for Implementation Nursing Science Initiative, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake 4701192, Aichi, Japan
Hiromi Sanada Former Global Nursing Research Center, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 1130033, Japan Former Department of Gerontological Nursing/Wound Care Management, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 1130033, Japan Ishikawa Prefectural Nursing University, 1-1 Gakuendai, Kahoku 9291210, Ishikawa, Japan

Collapse

Alshiek J, Murad-Regadas SM, Mellgren A, Glanc P, Khatri G, Quiroz LH, Weinstein MM, Rostaminia G, Oliveira L, Arif-Tiwari H, Ferrari L, Bordeianou L, Shobeiri SA. Consensus definitions and interpretation templates for dynamic ultrasound imaging of defecatory pelvic floor disorders : Proceedings of the consensus meeting of the pelvic floor disorders consortium of the american society of colon and rectal surgeons, the society of abdominal radiology, the international continence society, the American urogynecologic society, the international urogynecological association, and the society of gynecologic surgeons. Int Urogynecol J 2023;34:603-619. [PMID: 36617601 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-022-05414-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]

Consensus Definitions and Interpretation Templates for Dynamic Ultrasound Imaging of Defecatory Pelvic Floor Disorders. UROGYNECOLOGY (HAGERSTOWN, MD.) 2023;29:327-343. [PMID: 36652546 DOI: 10.1097/spv.0000000000001332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]

Alshiek J, Murad-Regadas SM, Mellgren A, Glanc P, Khatri G, Quiroz LH, Weinstein MM, Rostaminia G, Oliveira L, Arif-Tiwari H, Ferrari L, Bordeianou LG, Shobeiri SA. Consensus Definitions and Interpretation Templates for Dynamic Ultrasound Imaging of Defecatory Pelvic Floor Disorders: Proceedings of the Consensus Meeting of the Pelvic Floor Disorders Consortium of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, the Society of Abdominal Radiology, the International Continence Society, the American Urogynecologic Society, the International Urogynecological Association, and the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum 2023;66:200-216. [PMID: 36627252 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]

Hainsworth AJ, De Robles MS, Ferrari L, Solanki D, Williams AB, Schizas A. Total pelvic floor ultrasound can reliably predict long-term treatment outcomes for patients with pelvic floor defaecatory dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn 2023;42:90-97. [PMID: 36153653 DOI: 10.1002/nau.25051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Revised: 07/30/2022] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]

Thorsen AJ. Management of Rectocele with and without Obstructed Defecation. SEMINARS IN COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.scrs.2022.100937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]

Subramaniam N, Altamirano FAS, Barhum TF, Brown B, Dietz HP. Does parity impact obstructed defecation in women with normal anorectal anatomy? Int Urogynecol J 2022;33:3423-3428. [PMID: 35604419 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-022-05226-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2021] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]

Khatri G, Bhosale PR, Robbins JB, Akin EA, Ascher SM, Brook OR, Dassel M, Glanc P, Henrichsen TL, Learman LA, Sadowski EA, Saphier CJ, Wasnik AP, Maturen KE. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Pelvic Floor Dysfunction in Females. J Am Coll Radiol 2022;19:S137-S155. [PMID: 35550798 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/19/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]

Abstract

Pelvic floor disorders including pelvic organ prolapse (POP), urinary dysfunction, defecatory dysfunction, and complications after pelvic floor surgery are relatively common in the female population. Imaging tests are obtained when the initial clinical evaluation is thought to be incomplete or inconclusive or demonstrates findings that are discordant with patients' symptoms. An integrated imaging approach is optimal to evaluate the complex anatomy and dynamic functionality of the pelvic floor. Fluoroscopic cystocolpoproctography (CCP) and MR defecography are considered the initial imaging tests of choice for evaluation of POP. Fluoroscopic voiding cystourethrography is considered the initial imaging test for patients with urinary dysfunction. Fluoroscopic CCP and MR defecography are considered the initial imaging test for patients with defecatory dysfunction, whereas ultrasound pelvis transrectal is a complementary test in patients requiring evaluation for anal sphincter defects. MRI pelvis without and with intravenous contrast, MRI pelvis with dynamic maneuvers, and MR defecography are considered the initial imaging tests in patients with suspected complications of prior pelvic floor surgical repair. Transperineal ultrasound is emerging as an important imaging tool, in particular for screening of pelvic floor dysfunction and for evaluation of midurethral slings, vaginal mesh, and complications related to prior pelvic floor surgical repair. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Collapse

PASSOS MDCF, ALVARIZ RC, ANDRÉ EA, BARBUTI RC, FILLMANN HS, MURAD-REGADAS SM, REZENDE FILHO J, PERROTTI M, GUEDES L. DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT OF CHRONIC IDIOPATHIC CONSTIPATION: A NARRATIVE REVIEW FROM A BRAZILIAN EXPERT TASK FORCE. ARQUIVOS DE GASTROENTEROLOGIA 2022;59:137-144. [DOI: 10.1590/s0004-2803.202200001-23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]

Matsumoto M, Misawa N, Tsuda M, Manabe N, Kessoku T, Tamai N, Kawamoto A, Sugama J, Tanaka H, Kato M, Haruma K, Sanada H, Nakajima A. Expert Consensus Document: Diagnosis for Chronic Constipation with Faecal Retention in the Rectum Using Ultrasonography. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022;12:300. [PMID: 35204390 PMCID: PMC8871156 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12020300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Revised: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open

Affiliation(s)

Masaru Matsumoto School of Nursing, Ishikawa Prefectural Nursing University, 1-1 Gakuendai, Kahoku 929-1210, Japan; Department of Gerontological Nursing/Wound Care Management, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan;
Noboru Misawa Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan; (N.M.); (T.K.)
Momoko Tsuda Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Hakodate National Hospital, 18-16 Kawahara-cho, Hakodate 041-8512, Japan; (M.T.); (M.K.)
Noriaki Manabe Division of Endoscopy and Ultrasonography, Department of Clinical Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Kawasaki Medical School, 2-6-1 Nakasange, Kita-ku, Okayama 700-8505, Japan; (N.M.); (K.H.)
Takaomi Kessoku Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan; (N.M.); (T.K.) Department of Palliative Medicine, Yokohama City University Hospital, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan
Nao Tamai Department of Imaging Nursing Science, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan; Global Nursing Research Center, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
Atsuo Kawamoto Division of Ultrasound and Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan;
Junko Sugama Research Center for Implementation Nursing Science Initiative, School of Health Sciences, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake 470-1192, Japan;
Hideko Tanaka School of Nursing, College of Nursing and Nutrition, Shukutoku University, 673 Nitona-cho, Chuo-ku, Chiba City 260-8703, Japan;
Mototsugu Kato Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Hakodate National Hospital, 18-16 Kawahara-cho, Hakodate 041-8512, Japan; (M.T.); (M.K.)
Ken Haruma Division of Endoscopy and Ultrasonography, Department of Clinical Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Kawasaki Medical School, 2-6-1 Nakasange, Kita-ku, Okayama 700-8505, Japan; (N.M.); (K.H.)
Hiromi Sanada Department of Gerontological Nursing/Wound Care Management, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan; Global Nursing Research Center, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
Atsushi Nakajima Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan; (N.M.); (T.K.)

Collapse

Nam G, Song JY, Lee SR. A New Angle Measurement in Translabial Ultrasound as an Adjunct for the Diagnosis of Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022;12:diagnostics12010098. [PMID: 35054265 PMCID: PMC8775178 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12010098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 12/30/2021] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open

Yao YB, Yin HQ, Wang HJ, Liang HT, Wang B, Wang C. Is the transperineal ultrasonography approach effective for the diagnosis of rectocele? Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2021;9:461-469. [PMID: 34733532 PMCID: PMC8560031 DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goab019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2021] [Revised: 02/17/2021] [Accepted: 02/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open

Abstract

Background

Transperineal ultrasonography has been used as a diagnostic imaging modality for rectocele for many years. However, the consistency of ultrasonography and defecography in evaluating the severity of rectocele was not satisfactory. This study aimed to evaluate the agreement in the measurement of rectocele parameters between the two methods in different positions and provide clinical implications for the diagnosis of rectocele.

Methods

In this pilot study, participants were recruited in an outpatient clinic of a tertiary hospital between December 2017 and December 2019. All participants separately underwent defecation proctography at sitting and squatting positions, and undertook transperineal ultrasonography at left lateral, sitting, and squatting positions. The consistency of ultrasonography and defecography was evaluated.

Results

Thirty female volunteers with rectocele were included in this study. The degree of anorectal angle was significantly larger at rest and during contraction, maximal Valsalva, and evacuation; the depth of the rectocele was significantly deeper during maximal Valsalva and evacuation; and the length of the perineum descending was significantly longer during contraction and maximal Valsalva in using squatting position compared to the sitting position when performing the defecation proctography. The degree of anorectal angle, the depth of rectocele, the area of levator hiatus, and the volume of the rectocele were significantly different in using squatting, sitting, and left lateral positions when performing the transperineal ultrasonography. Bland-Altman semi-quantitative plots showed good consistency in the measurement of the anorectal angle and the depth of the rectocele between proctography and ultrasonography in both sitting and squatting positions.

Conclusions

The findings of our study may be considered as the preliminary evidence to support the use of transperineal ultrasonography with sitting and squatting positions as the imaging test of choice for evaluating patients with rectocele.

Collapse

van Gruting IM, Stankiewicz A, Thakar R, Santoro GA, IntHout J, Sultan AH. Imaging modalities for the detection of posterior pelvic floor disorders in women with obstructed defaecation syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021;9:CD011482. [PMID: 34553773 PMCID: PMC8459393 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011482.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Obstructed defaecation syndrome (ODS) is difficulty in evacuating stools, requiring straining efforts at defaecation, having the sensation of incomplete evacuation, or the need to manually assist defaecation. This is due to a physical blockage of the faecal stream during defaecation attempts, caused by rectocele, enterocele, intussusception, anismus or pelvic floor descent. Evacuation proctography (EP) is the most common imaging technique for diagnosis of posterior pelvic floor disorders. It has been regarded as the reference standard because of extensive experience, although it has been proven not to have perfect accuracy. Moreover, EP is invasive, embarrassing and uses ionising radiation. Alternative imaging techniques addressing these issues have been developed and assessed for their accuracy. Because of varying results, leading to a lack of consensus, a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature are required.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the diagnostic test accuracy of EP, dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and pelvic floor ultrasound for the detection of posterior pelvic floor disorders in women with ODS, using latent class analysis in the absence of a reference standard, and to assess whether MRI or ultrasound could replace EP. The secondary objective was to investigate differences in diagnostic test accuracy in relation to the use of rectal contrast, evacuation phase, patient position and cut-off values, which could influence test outcome.

SEARCH METHODS

We ran an electronic search on 18 December 2019 in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, SCI, CINAHL and CPCI. Reference list, Google scholar. We also searched WHO ICTRP and clinicaltrials.gov for eligible articles. Two review authors conducted title and abstract screening and full-text assessment, resolving disagreements with a third review author.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Diagnostic test accuracy and cohort studies were eligible for inclusion if they evaluated the test accuracy of EP, and MRI or pelvic floor ultrasound, or both, for the detection of posterior pelvic floor disorders in women with ODS. We excluded case-control studies. If studies partially met the inclusion criteria, we contacted the authors for additional information.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors performed data extraction, including study characteristics, 'Risk-of-bias' assessment, sources of heterogeneity and test accuracy results. We excluded studies if test accuracy data could not be retrieved despite all efforts. We performed meta-analysis using Bayesian hierarchical latent class analysis. For the index test to qualify as a replacement test for EP, both sensitivity and specificity should be similar or higher than the historic reference standard (EP), and for a triage test either specificity or sensitivity should be similar or higher. We conducted heterogeneity analysis assessing the effect of different test conditions on test accuracy. We ran sensitivity analyses by excluding studies with high risk of bias, with concerns about applicability, or those published before 2010. We assessed the overall quality of evidence (QoE) according to GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirty-nine studies covering 2483 participants were included into the meta-analyses. We produced pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity for all index tests for each target condition. Findings of the sensitivity analyses were consistent with the main analysis. Sensitivity of EP for diagnosis of rectocele was 98% (credible interval (CrI)94%-99%), enterocele 91%(CrI 83%-97%), intussusception 89%(CrI 79%-96%) and pelvic floor descent 98%(CrI 93%-100%); specificity for enterocele was 96%(CrI 93%-99%), intussusception 92%(CrI 86%-97%) and anismus 97%(CrI 94%-99%), all with high QoE. Moderate to low QoE showed a sensitivity for anismus of 80%(CrI 63%-94%), and specificity for rectocele of 78%(CrI 63%-90%) and pelvic floor descent 83%(CrI 59%-96%). Specificity of MRI for diagnosis of rectocele was 90% (CrI 79%-97%), enterocele 99% (CrI 96%-100%) and intussusception 97% (CrI 88%-100%), meeting the criteria for a triage test with high QoE. MRI did not meet the criteria to replace EP. Heterogeneity analysis showed that sensitivity of MRI performed with evacuation phase was higher than without for rectocele (94%, CrI 87%-98%) versus 65%, CrI 52% to 89%, and enterocele (87%, CrI 74%-95% versus 62%, CrI 51%-88%), and sensitivity of MRI without evacuation phase was significantly lower than EP. Specificity of transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) for diagnosis of rectocele was 89% (CrI 81%-96%), enterocele 98% (CrI 95%-100%) and intussusception 96% (CrI 91%-99%); sensitivity for anismus was 92% (CrI 72%-98%), meeting the criteria for a triage test with high QoE. TPUS did not meet the criteria to replace EP. Heterogeneity analysis showed that sensitivity of TPUS performed with rectal contrast was not significantly higher than without for rectocele(92%, CrI 69%-99% versus 81%, CrI 58%-95%), enterocele (90%, CrI 71%-99% versus 67%, CrI 51%-90%) and intussusception (90%, CrI 69%-98% versus 61%, CrI 51%-86%), and was lower than EP. Specificity of endovaginal ultrasound (EVUS) for diagnosis of rectocele was 76% (CrI 54%-93%), enterocele 97% (CrI 80%-99%) and intussusception 93% (CrI 72%-99%); sensitivity for anismus was 84% (CrI 59%-96%), meeting the criteria for a triage test with very low to moderate QoE. EVUS did not meet the criteria to replace EP. Specificity of dynamic anal endosonography (DAE) for diagnosis of rectocele was 88% (CrI 62%-99%), enterocele 97% (CrI 75%-100%) and intussusception 93% (CrI 65%-99%), meeting the criteria for a triage test with very low to moderate QoE. DAE did not meet the criteria to replace EP. Echodefaecography (EDF) had a sensitivity of 89% (CrI 65%-98%) and specificity of 92% (CrI 72%-99%) for intussusception, meeting the criteria to replace EP but with very low QoE. Specificity of EDF for diagnosis of rectocele was 89% (CrI 60%-99%) and for enterocele 97% (CrI 87%-100%); sensitivity for anismus was 87% (CrI 72%-96%), meeting the criteria for a triage test with low to very low QoE.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In a population of women with symptoms of ODS, none of the imaging techniques met the criteria to replace EP. MRI and TPUS met the criteria of a triage test, as a positive test confirms diagnosis of rectocele, enterocele and intussusception, and a negative test rules out diagnosis of anismus. An evacuation phase increased sensitivity of MRI. Rectal contrast did not increase sensitivity of TPUS. QoE of EVUS, DAE and EDF was too low to draw conclusions. More well-designed studies are required to define their role in the diagnostic pathway of ODS.

Collapse

Hainsworth AJ, Solanki D, Morris SJ, Igbedioh C, Schizas AMP, Williams AB. Is there any association between symptoms and findings on imaging in pelvic floor defaecatory dysfunction? A prospective study. Colorectal Dis 2021;23:237-245. [PMID: 33090672 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2020] [Revised: 08/29/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]

Does the presence of a true radiological rectocele increase the likelihood of symptoms of prolapse? Int Urogynecol J 2020;32:2233-2237. [PMID: 33196881 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-020-04476-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]

Ultrasound in the investigation of pelvic floor disorders. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2020;32:431-440. [DOI: 10.1097/gco.0000000000000659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]

Persistent levator co-activation is not associated with symptoms or bother of obstructed defecation. Int Urogynecol J 2020;31:2611-2615. [DOI: 10.1007/s00192-020-04389-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]

Orazov MR, Toktar L, Rybina A, Gevorgian D, Dostieva S, Lologaeva M, Karimova G. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING OF PELVIC FLOOR DYSFUNCTION, REVIEW. REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE 2020. [DOI: 10.37800/rm2020-1-16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open

Matsumoto M, Tsutaoka T, Nakagami G, Tanaka S, Yoshida M, Miura Y, Sugama J, Okada S, Ohta H, Sanada H. Deep learning-based classification of rectal fecal retention and analysis of fecal properties using ultrasound images in older adult patients. Jpn J Nurs Sci 2020;17:e12340. [PMID: 32394621 DOI: 10.1111/jjns.12340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2019] [Revised: 02/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]

The relationship between obstructed defecation and true rectocele in patients with pelvic organ prolapse. Sci Rep 2020;10:5599. [PMID: 32221359 PMCID: PMC7101397 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-62376-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2019] [Accepted: 03/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open

Jeong HY, Yang SJ, Cho DH, Park DH, Lee JK. Comparison of 3-Dimensional Pelvic Floor Ultrasonography and Defecography for Assessment of Posterior Pelvic Floor Disorders. Ann Coloproctol 2020;36:256-263. [PMID: 32178497 PMCID: PMC7508475 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2020.02.09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2019] [Accepted: 02/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open

Black CJ, Ford AC. Chronic idiopathic constipation in adults: epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and clinical management. Med J Aust 2019;209:86-91. [PMID: 29996755 DOI: 10.5694/mja18.00241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 121] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2018] [Accepted: 05/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]

American Urogynecologic Society Best-Practice Statement on Evaluation of Obstructed Defecation. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2019;24:383-391. [PMID: 30365459 DOI: 10.1097/spv.0000000000000635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]

van Gruting IMA, Kluivers K, Sultan AH, De Bin R, Stankiewicz A, Blake H, Thakar R. Does 4D transperineal ultrasound have additional value over 2D transperineal ultrasound for diagnosing posterior pelvic floor disorders in women with obstructed defecation syndrome? ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY 2018;52:784-791. [PMID: 29882224 DOI: 10.1002/uog.19105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2017] [Revised: 04/26/2018] [Accepted: 05/13/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To establish the diagnostic test accuracy of two-dimensional (2D) and four-dimensional (4D) transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) for diagnosis of posterior pelvic floor disorders in women with obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS), in order to assess if 4D ultrasound imaging provides additional value.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study of 121 consecutive women with ODS. Symptoms of ODS and pelvic organ prolapse on clinical examination were assessed using validated methods. All women underwent both 2D- and 4D-TPUS. Imaging analysis was performed by two blinded observers. Posterior pelvic floor disorders were dichotomized into presence or absence, according to predefined cut-off values. In the absence of a reference standard, a composite reference standard was created from a combination of results of evacuation proctography, magnetic resonance imaging and endovaginal ultrasound. Primary outcome measures were diagnostic test characteristics of 2D- and 4D-TPUS for rectocele, enterocele, intussusception and anismus. Secondary outcome measures were interobserver agreement, agreement between the two imaging techniques, and association of severity of ODS symptoms and degree of posterior vaginal wall prolapse with conditions observed on imaging.

RESULTS

For diagnosis of all four posterior pelvic floor disorders, there was no difference in sensitivity or specificity between 2D- and 4D-TPUS (P = 0.131-1.000). Good agreement between 2D- and 4D-TPUS was found for diagnosis of rectocele (κ = 0.675) and moderate agreement for diagnoses of enterocele, intussusception and anismus (κ = 0.465-0.545). There was no difference in rectocele depth measurements between the techniques (19.9 mm for 2D vs 19.0 mm for 4D, P = 0.802). Interobserver agreement was comparable for both techniques, although 2D-TPUS had excellent interobserver agreement for diagnosis of enterocele and rectocele depth measurements, while this was only moderate and good, respectively, for 4D-TPUS. Diagnoses of rectocele and enterocele on both 2D- and 4D-TPUS were significantly associated with degree of posterior vaginal wall prolapse on clinical examination (odds ratio (OR) = 1.89-2.72). The conditions observed using either imaging technique were not associated with severity of ODS symptoms (OR = 0.82-1.13).

CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence of superiority of 4D ultrasound acquisition to dynamic 2D ultrasound acquisition for the diagnosis of posterior pelvic floor disorders. 2D- and 4D-TPUS could be used interchangeably to screen women with symptoms of ODS. Copyright © 2018 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Collapse

Yabunaka K, Nakagami G, Tabata K, Sugama J, Matsumoto M, Kido Y, Iuchi T, Sanada H. Constipation in the elderly in a Japanese long-term medical facility: An ultrasonographic investigation. Drug Discov Ther 2018;12:233-238. [PMID: 30224595 DOI: 10.5582/ddt.2018.01033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]

Management of patients with rectal prolapse: the 2017 Dutch guidelines. Tech Coloproctol 2018;22:589-596. [PMID: 30099626 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-018-1830-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2018] [Accepted: 07/31/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]

Dietz HP, Gómez M, Atan IK, Ferreira CSW. Association between vaginal parity and rectocele. Int Urogynecol J 2018;29:1479-1483. [PMID: 29464300 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-017-3552-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2017] [Accepted: 12/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]

Albuquerque A, Macedo G. Anal Sphincters Evaluation by Endoanal Ultrasound in Obstructed Defecation. JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE 2017;36:2519-2524. [PMID: 28649718 DOI: 10.1002/jum.14300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2017] [Revised: 03/13/2017] [Accepted: 03/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/06/2023]

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate anal sphincter abnormalities detected by endoanal ultrasound in obstructed defecation due to rectocele and rectal intussusception.

METHODS

The retrospective analysis includes 45 patients with obstructed defecation syndrome due to rectocele and/or rectal intussusception with or without fecal incontinence, and submitted to endoanal ultrasound.

RESULTS

Ninety-three percent (n = 42) were women (mean age of 63 ± 12 years), and 47% (n = 21) of the patients had fecal incontinence. In total, 29% (n = 13) had a previous anorectal surgery, and 93% (n = 39) of the women had a previous vaginal delivery. An isolated rectal intussusception was diagnosed in 20% (n = 9) of the patients, an isolated rectocele in 24% (n = 11), and rectal intussusception and rectocele in 56% (n = 25). Thirty-six percent of patients had anal sphincter lacerations (n = 16): 12% (n = 2) had only internal laceration, 69% (n = 11) had only external laceration, and 19% (n = 3) had both. Two patients had a thinner internal anal sphincter with 0.9 and 1.2 mm, respectively. In total, 25% of the patients without fecal incontinence had an occult anal sphincter laceration, and all were women with an external sphincter laceration in the anterior quadrant and a previous vaginal delivery. In patients with obstructed defecation and fecal incontinence, 48% had sphincter lacerations. Previous anorectal surgery was a predictor of anal sphincter laceration (odds ratio [OR] 4.8; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.214-18.971; P = .025), but fecal incontinence (OR 2.7; 95% CI = 0.774-9.613; P = .119) and previous vaginal delivery (OR 1.250; 95% CI = 0.104-15.011; P = .860) were not.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoanal ultrasound should be considered in obstructed defecation with or without fecal incontinence, especially if surgical correction is planned.

Collapse

Accuracy of Four Imaging Techniques for Diagnosis of Posterior Pelvic Floor Disorders. Obstet Gynecol 2017;130:1017-1024. [PMID: 29016504 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000002245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To establish the diagnostic test accuracy of evacuation proctography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), transperineal ultrasonography, and endovaginal ultrasonography for detecting posterior pelvic floor disorders (rectocele, enterocele, intussusception, and anismus) in women with obstructed defecation syndrome and secondarily to identify the most patient-friendly imaging technique.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, 131 women with symptoms of obstructed defecation syndrome underwent evacuation proctogram, MRI, and transperineal and endovaginal ultrasonography. Images were analyzed by two blinded observers. In the absence of a reference standard, latent class analysis was used to assess diagnostic test accuracy of multiple tests with area under the curve (AUC) as the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures were interobserver agreement calculated as Cohen's κ and patient acceptability using a visual analog scale.

RESULTS

No significant differences in diagnostic accuracy were found among the imaging techniques for all the target conditions. Estimates of diagnostic test accuracy were highest for rectocele using MRI (AUC 0.79) or transperineal ultrasonography (AUC 0.85), for enterocele using transperineal (AUC 0.73) or endovaginal ultrasonography (AUC 0.87), for intussusception using evacuation proctography (AUC 0.76) or endovaginal ultrasonography (AUC 0.77), and for anismus using endovaginal (AUC 0.95) or transperineal ultrasonography (AUC 0.78). Interobserver agreement for the diagnosis of rectocele (κ 0.53-0.72), enterocele (κ 0.54-0.94) and anismus (κ 0.43-0.81) was moderate to excellent, but poor to fair for intussusception (κ -0.03 to 0.37) with all techniques. Patient acceptability was better for transperineal and endovaginal ultrasonography as compared with MRI and evacuation proctography (P<.001).

CONCLUSION

Evacuation proctography, MRI, and transperineal and endovaginal ultrasonography were shown to have similar diagnostic test accuracy. Evacuation proctography is not the best available imaging technique. There is no one optimal test for the diagnosis of all posterior pelvic floor disorders. Because transperineal and endovaginal ultrasonography have good test accuracy and patient acceptability, we suggest these could be used for initial assessment of obstructed defecation syndrome.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02239302.

Collapse

Grob ATM, van der Vaart LR, Withagen MIJ, van der Vaart CH. Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies on pelvic floor three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound: a systematic review. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY 2017;50:451-457. [PMID: 28000958 DOI: 10.1002/uog.17390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2016] [Revised: 12/02/2016] [Accepted: 12/13/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In recent years, a large number of studies have been published on the clinical relevance of pelvic floor three-dimensional (3D) transperineal ultrasound. Several studies compare sonography with other imaging modalities or clinical examination. The quality of reporting in these studies is not known. The objective of this systematic review was to determine the compliance of diagnostic accuracy studies investigating pelvic floor 3D ultrasound with the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) guidelines.

METHODS

Published articles on pelvic floor 3D ultrasound were identified by a systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Web of Science and Scopus databases. Prospective and retrospective studies that compared pelvic floor 3D ultrasound with other clinical and imaging diagnostics were included in the analysis. STARD compliance was assessed and quantified by two independent investigators, using 22 of the original 25 STARD checklist items. Items with the qualifier 'if done' (Items 13, 23 and 24) were excluded because they were not applicable to all papers. Each item was scored as reported (score = 1) or not reported (score = 0). Observer variability, the total number of reported STARD items per article and summary scores for each item were calculated. The difference in total score between STARD-adopting and non-adopting journals was tested statistically, as was the effect of year of publication.

RESULTS

Forty studies published in 13 scientific journals were included in the analysis. Mean ± SD STARD checklist score of the included articles was 16.0 ± 2.5 out of a maximum of 22 points. The lowest scores (< 50%) were found for reporting of handling of indeterminate results or missing responses, adverse events and the time interval between tests. Interobserver agreement for rating the STARD items was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.77). An independent t-test showed no significant mean difference ± SD in total STARD checklist score between STARD-adopting and non-adopting journals (16.4 ± 2.2 vs 15.9 ± 2.6, respectively). Mean ± SD STARD checklist score for articles published in 2003-2009 was lower, but not statistically different, compared with those published in 2010-2015 (15.2 ± 2.5 vs 16.6 ± 2.4, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The overall compliance with reporting guidelines of diagnostic accuracy studies on pelvic floor 3D transperineal ultrasound is relatively good compared with other fields of medicine. However, specific checklist items require more attention when reported. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Collapse

Dynamic translabial ultrasound versus echodefecography combined with the endovaginal approach to assess pelvic floor dysfunctions: How effective are these techniques? Tech Coloproctol 2017;21:555-565. [PMID: 28674949 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-017-1658-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2017] [Accepted: 06/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]

Pelvic Floor Ultrasound: A Review. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2017;60:58-81. [DOI: 10.1097/grf.0000000000000264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]

Rachaneni S, Atan IK, Shek KL, Dietz HP. Digital rectal examination in the evaluation of rectovaginal septal defects. Int Urogynecol J 2017;28:1401-1405. [PMID: 28213798 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-017-3285-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2016] [Accepted: 01/25/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]

Hainsworth AJ, Solanki D, Hamad A, Morris SJ, Schizas AMP, Williams AB. Integrated total pelvic floor ultrasound in pelvic floor defaecatory dysfunction. Colorectal Dis 2017;19:O54-O65. [PMID: 27886434 DOI: 10.1111/codi.13568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2016] [Accepted: 09/30/2016] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]

Abstract

AIM

Imaging for pelvic floor defaecatory dysfunction includes defaecation proctography. Integrated total pelvic floor ultrasound (transvaginal, transperineal, endoanal) may be an alternative. This study assesses ultrasound accuracy for the detection of rectocele, intussusception, enterocele and dyssynergy compared with defaecation proctography, and determines if ultrasound can predict symptoms and findings on proctography. Treatment is examined.

METHOD

Images of 323 women who underwent integrated total pelvic floor ultrasound and defaecation proctography between 2011 and 2014 were blindly reviewed. The size and grade of rectocele, enterocele, intussusception and dyssynergy were noted on both, using proctography as the gold standard. Barium trapping in a rectocele or a functionally significant enterocele was noted on proctography. Demographics and Obstructive Defaecation Symptom scores were collated.

RESULTS

The positive predictive value of ultrasound was 73% for rectocele, 79% for intussusception and 91% for enterocele. The negative predictive value for dyssynergy was 99%. Agreement was moderate for rectocele and intussusception, good for enterocele and fair for dyssynergy. The majority of rectoceles that required surgery (59/61) and caused barium trapping (85/89) were detected on ultrasound. A rectocele seen on both transvaginal and transperineal scanning was more likely to require surgery than if seen with only one mode (P = 0.0001). If there was intussusception on ultrasound the patient was more likely to have surgery (P = 0.03). An enterocele visualized on ultrasound was likely to be functionally significant on proctography (P = 0.02). There was, however, no association between findings on imaging and symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Integrated total pelvic floor ultrasound provides a useful screening tool for women with defaecatory dysfunction such that defaecatory imaging can avoided in some.

Collapse

Fabrizio AC, Alimi Y, Kumar AS. Methods of Evaluation of Anorectal Causes of Obstructed Defecation. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2016;30:46-56. [PMID: 28144212 DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1593427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]

Hainsworth AJ, Pilkington SA, Grierson C, Rutherford E, Schizas AMP, Nugent KP, Williams AB. Accuracy of integrated total pelvic floor ultrasound compared to defaecatory MRI in females with pelvic floor defaecatory dysfunction. Br J Radiol 2016;89:20160522. [PMID: 27730818 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open

Martellucci J, Brusciano L. The Dynamic Transperineal Ultrasound Era of the Evaluation of Obstructed Defecation Syndrome. Dis Colon Rectum 2016;59:800-803. [PMID: 27384099 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000000586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]

Albuquerque A, Pereira E. Current applications of transperineal ultrasound in gastroenterology. World J Radiol 2016;8:370-377. [PMID: 27158423 PMCID: PMC4840194 DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i4.370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2015] [Revised: 01/23/2016] [Accepted: 03/04/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open

Santoro GA, Sultan AH. Pelvic floor anatomy and imaging. SEMINARS IN COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY 2016. [DOI: 10.1053/j.scrs.2015.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]

Lone F, Sultan AH, Stankiewicz A, Thakar R. Interobserver agreement of multicompartment ultrasound in the assessment of pelvic floor anatomy. Br J Radiol 2016;89:20150704. [PMID: 26800394 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20150704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open

Guzman Rojas R, Kamisan Atan I, Shek KL, Dietz HP. The prevalence of abnormal posterior compartment anatomy and its association with obstructed defecation symptoms in urogynecological patients. Int Urogynecol J 2015;27:939-44. [DOI: 10.1007/s00192-015-2914-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2015] [Accepted: 11/23/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]

de la Portilla F, Rubio Manzanares Dorado M, Pino Díaz V, Vazquez Monchul JM, Palacios C, Díaz Pavón JM, Sánchez Gil JM, García Cabrera AM. Utilidad de la ecografía dinámica tridimensional en el estudio del suelo pélvico. Cir Esp 2015;93:530-5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2014.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2014] [Revised: 11/04/2014] [Accepted: 11/23/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]

Hainsworth AJ, Solanki D, Schizas AMP, Williams AB. Total pelvic floor ultrasound for pelvic floor defaecatory dysfunction: a pictorial review. Br J Radiol 2015;88:20150494. [PMID: 26388109 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20150494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open

Digitation associated with defecation: what does it mean in urogynaecological patients? Int Urogynecol J 2015;27:229-32. [DOI: 10.1007/s00192-015-2813-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2015] [Accepted: 07/24/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]

Beer-Gabel M, Carter D. Comparison of dynamic transperineal ultrasound and defecography for the evaluation of pelvic floor disorders. Int J Colorectal Dis 2015;30:835-41. [PMID: 25820786 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-015-2195-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/11/2015] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]

Dietz HP, Zhang X, Shek KL, Guzman RR. How large does a rectocele have to be to cause symptoms? A 3D/4D ultrasound study. Int Urogynecol J 2015;26:1355-9. [DOI: 10.1007/s00192-015-2709-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2014] [Accepted: 03/26/2015] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]