Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Cardiol. Mar 26, 2017; 9(3): 230-240
Published online Mar 26, 2017. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i3.230
Table 1 Clinical studies on contact force monitoring and mid/long-term outcomes
StudynType of studyCF catheterControl catheterFollow-up (mo)Findings
Andrade et al[55], 201475Prospective observationalThermocool SmarTouchNavistar Thermocool13.3CF reduced dormant conduction (16% vs 52%) and improved long-term arrhythmia-free survival (88% vs 66%)
Kimura et al[31], 201438Randomized controlled trialThermocool SmarTouchThermocool SmarTouch (blinded operador)6CF reduced procedure time and additional touch-up ablation
Marijon et al[61], 201460Prospective observationalThermocool SmarTouchEZ Steer Thermocool12CF reduced AF recurrence at 12 mo (10.5% vs 35.9%)
Shurrab et al[33], 201542ObservationalThermocool SmarTouchNavistar Thermocool2.5CF reduced reconnection rate at 30 min postablation
TOCCASTAR, 2015300Randomized controlled trialTacticathThermocool Navistar12No differences in arrhythmia-free survival
Pedrote et al[24], 201650Randomized controlled trialThermocool SmarTouchThermocool SmarTouch (blinded operador)12CF reduced PV gaps (20% vs 68%). No benefits in arrhythmia-free survival
Ullah et al[34], 2016117Randomized controlled trialThermocool SmarTouchThermocool SmarTouch (blinded operador)12CF reduced acute reconnections (22% vs 32%). No benefits in arrhythmia-free survival