Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Cardiol. May 26, 2014; 6(5): 260-276
Published online May 26, 2014. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v6.i5.260
Table 1 Cross-sectional studies evaluating vitamin D blood pressure
Ref.YearStudy design(sample size)Country (ethnicity)AgeCorrelation (lower reference range of 25(OH) vitamin D)Findings
Snijder et al[67]2007Cross-sectional from the LASA (1205 subjects more than 65 yr old)Netherlands (caucasian) men and women ≥ 65 yrNo (I quartile: < 25 nmol/L)25(OH) vitamin D was not associated with systolic or diastolic BP or prevalence of hypertension. Instead, PTH correlated with both BP and hypertension incidence
Martins et al[95]2007Cross-sectional from the 1988-1994 NHANES (15088 subjects)United States (Caucasian and African Americans and other) men and women age stratifiedYes (I quartile: < 52.5 nmol/L)Adjusted inter-quartile analysis showed an increased prevalence of hypertension in in the lower quartile of 25(OH) vitamin D (OR = 1.30, 95%CI; 1.13-1.49; P < 0.05)
Scragg et al[96]2007Cross-sectional from the 1988-1994 NHANES (12644 subjects not treated with anti-hypertensive drugs)United States (Caucasian and African Americans and other) men and women age stratifiedYes (I quintile: < 40 nmol/L)Adjusted inter-quintile analysis of 25(OH) vitamin D showed significant inverse correlation with both systolic (P < 0.01) and diastolic (P < 0.05) BP. This association was stronger in more than 50 years old and black people
Judd et al[97]2008Cross-sectional from the 1988-1992 NHANES (7699 non-hypertensive subjects)United States (White and black people ) men and women age stratifiedYes (Vitamin D deficiency defined as < 50 nmol/L)Lower 25(OH) vitamin D concentrations were associated with a higher blood pressure category in white people (P < 0.01) but after adjustment for age the association was no longer significant
Hintzpeter et al[98]2008Cross-sectional from GNHIES (4030 adults)Germany (Caucasian) men and women 18-79 yrYes (Vitamin D deficiency defined as < 12 nmol/L[99])According to 25(OH) vitamin D levels, in multivariate analysis there was a relationship between 25(OH) vitamin D and hypertension bot in men (OR = 0.97, 95%CI: 0.94-0.99; P < 0.05) and in women (OR 0.96, 95%CI: 0.93-0.99; P < 0.05)
Hypponen et al[100]2008Cross-sectional from 1958 British birth cohort (6810 subjects)United Kingdom (Caucasian) men and women 45-47 yrYes (I tertile: < 45 nmol/L)The lower 25(OH) vitamin D tertile was associated with hypertension (OR 0.72, 95%CI: 0.61-0.86; P < 0.01)
Reis et al[101]2009Cross-sectional from the 2001-2004 NHANES (3577 non-pregnant adolescents without diagnosed diabetes)United States (Caucasian and African Americans and other) male and female adolescent 12-19 yrYes (I quartile: < 37.5 nmol/L)25(OH) vitamin D was inversely associated with systolic BP (P < 0.05) also in the adjusted odds ratio for the interquartile comparison (OR = 2.36, 95%CI: 1.33-4.19; P < 0.05)
Pasco et al[102]2009Cross-sectional (861 subjects)Australia (Caucasian) women: 20-92 yrYes (I tertile 25(OH)D: < 30 nmol/L)In this cohort there was a significant inter-tertile difference in mean BP (P < 0.001) as well as in anti-hypertensive medication use (P < 0.01)
Almirall et al[103]2010Cross-sectional (237 subjects more than 64 years old)Spain (Caucasian) men and women 64-93 yrYes (cut-off for vitamin D deficiency: < 62.5 nmol/L)A significant negative association was observed between serum 25(OH) vitamin D levels and both systolic (P < 0.05) and diastolic BP (P < 0.05) also in multivariate analysis
Jorde et al[104]2010Cross-sectional from the Tromsø Study (4125 subjects not treated with anti-hypertensive drugs)Norway (Caucasian) Men and women age stratifiedYes (I quartile: < 41.4 nmol/L)At adjusted inter-quartile analysis serum 25(OH) vitamin D was inversely correlated with systolic BP (P < 0.01)
Kim et al[105]2010Cross-sectional (1330 subjects)South Korea (Asian)Yes (I quintile: < 29.7 nmol/L)At adjusted inter-quintile analysis, both systolic and diastolic BP decreased linearly with increasing of 25(OH) vitamin D (quintile 1-5; P for trend < 0.01). Moreover, inter-quintile comparison of BP had OR of 0.42 (95%CI: 0.24-0.73; P < 0.05)
Zhao et al[106]2010Cross-sectional from the 2003-2006 NHANES (5414 subjects not assuming anti-hypertensive drugs)Men and women < 40 yr United States (Hispanic, Caucasian and African Americans) men and women ≥ 20 yrYes (I quintile: < 37.5 nmol/LAcross 25(OH) vitamin D quintiles systolic and diastolic BP decreased linearly and inversely (P < 0.01). Moreover, the prevalence ratio for hypertension was lower in the highest quintile (OR = 0.82, 95%CI: 0.73-0.91; P < 0.05)
Fraser et al[107]2010Cross-sectional from the 2001-2006 NHANES (3958 subjects)United States (Caucasian and African Americans and other) men and women ≥ 20 yrYes (linear correlation)25(OH) vitamin D has an inverse linear correlation with systolic blood pressure in various adjusted models (P < 0.05)
Steinvil et al[108]2011Cross-sectional case-control study (34874 subjects of which 8387 hypertensive)Israel men and women 38-72 yrYes (vitamin D deficiency defined as < 37.5 nmol/L)The age-adjusted OR for hypertension among normal and deficient serum 25(OH) vitamin D was 1.19 (95%CI: 1.09-1.31; P < 0.01) in women, whereas in men there was not statistical difference
Burgaz et al[109]2011Cross-sectional from the ULSAM (833 adult men)Sweden (Caucasian) Men 71 yrYes (vitamin D deficiency defined as < 37.5 nmol/L)Adjusted logistic regression confirmed the association between 25(OH) vitamin D concentration < 37.5 nmol/L and hypertension (OR = 3.3, 95%CI: 1.0-11.0; P < 0.05)
Bhandari et al[110]2011Cross-sectional (2722 subjects of which 1415 hypertensive)United States (Caucasian and African Americans and other) men and women mean age 58.5 yrYes (I quartile: < 37.5 nmol/L)The prevalence rate of hypertension was inversely correlated with serum 25(OH) vitamin D. Inter-quartile comparison showed an adjusted OR of 2.70 (95%CI: 1.41-5.19; P < 0.05)
Pacifico et al[111]2011Cross-sectional case-control study (452 children and adolescent of which 304 over-weight/obese and 148 normal weight)Italy (Caucasian) Male and female childrenYes (I tertile of 1,25(OH)2 vitamin D: < 42.5 nmol/L)1,25(OH)2 vitamin D was inversely correlated with systolic BP both in the whole population (P < 0.01) and over-weight (P < 0.01) population as well as in control group (P < 0.01). Regardless of model for adjusted analysis, the OR for hypertension among tertile categories had a P value < 0.05.
Williams et al[112]2011Cross-sectional from 2003-2006 NHANES (5617 adolescent)United States (Caucasian and African Americans and other) male and female children 12-19 yrYes (linear correlation)In this cohort, 25(OH) vitamin D showed a linear inverse association with systolic BP in multivariate analysis (P < 0.01).
Forrest et al[113]2011Cross-sectional from 2005-2006 NHANES (4495 adults subjects of which 1482 hypertensive)United States (Caucasian and African Americans and other) Men and women age stratifiedYes (vitamin D deficiency defined < 50 nmol/L[114])Vitamin D deficiency independently correlated with prevalence of hypertension (P < 0.01).
He et al[70]2011Cross-sectional from 2003-2006 NHANES (7561 of which 1849 treated with anti-hypertensive drugs)United States (Caucasian and African Americans and other) Men and women age stratifiedNo (I quintile: < 33 nmol/L)25(OH) vitamin D was inversely associated with systolic BP. However, 25(OH) vitamin D lost its statistical significance in a multivariate analysis including PTH. Instead, PTH maintained a strong correlation with BP in multivariate analysis regardless of covariates.
Dorjgochoo et al[115]2012Cross-sectional study from two, population-based, prospective cohort studies (1460 subjects of which 547 hypertensive)China (Asian) men and women 40-74 yrYes (lowers range defined by I quintile 23.5 nmol/L and cut-offs of 37.5 nmol/L[116] and 27.5 nmol/L[117])Among men cohort, BP was inversely and significantly correlated with 25(OH) vitamin D (P < 0.05). Moreover, prevalence of hypertension was inversely associated with non-deficient status of vitamin D (adjusted OR = 0.29, 95%CI: 0.10-0.82; P < 0.05)
Sakamoto et al[118]2013Cross-sectional from the AHS-2 (568 subjects)United States (equally matched Caucasian and African Americans) men and women 30-95 yrYes (vitamin D deficiency defined as < 50 nmol/L)Regardless of adjusted analysis models, Caucasian people showed a linear inverse correlation between 25(OH) vitamin D and BP (P < 0.05). Also the comparison between vitamin D deficient and non-deficient showed statistical difference (P < 0.05).
Li et al[64]2012Cross-sectional (1420 subjects of which 487 hypertensive)China (Asian) Men and women ≥ 65 yrNo (I quartile: < 42 nmol/L)Serum 25(OH) vitamin D levels were not associated with risk of hypertension in single and multiple regression models. Similarly, PTH is not independently associated with BP or risk of hypertension
Caro et al[119]2012Cross-sectional (219 subjects of which 115 hypertensive)Puerto Rico (Hispanic) Men and women 21-50 yrNo (cut-off used to define non optimal: 75 nmol/L)Vitamin D status was not found to be associated with BP
Chan et al[72]2012Cross-sectional (939 men aged 65 yr and older)China (Asian) men ≥ 65 yr (age strafied)No (I quartile: < 63 nmol/L)Vitamin D status was not found to be associated with BP. Instead, PTH was directly and independently associated with BP also in multivariate analysis.
Parikh et al[120]2012Cross-sectional (701 adolescents)United States (Caucasian and African Americans) Male and female 14-18 yrYes (I tertile: < 54.8 nmol/L)Serum 25(OH) vitamin D has a linear inverse correlation with both systolic (P < 0.05) and diastolic (P < 0.01) BP. However, in the adjusted analysis only the relationship with systolic BP remained significant.
Sabanayagam et al[121]2012Cross-sectional from NHANES III (9215 subjects of which 3712 with pre-hypertension)United States (Caucasian and African Americans and other) men and women age stratifiedYes (I quartile: < 44.25 nmol/L)In this cohort the systolic BP are inversely correlated with the vitamin D status (P < 0.05) and lower values of 25(OH) vitamin D were associated with increase prevalence of pre-hypertension (adjusted OR = 1.48, 95%CI: 1.16-1.90; P value for trend < 0.01).
van Ballegooijen et al[122]2012Cross-sectional from the Hoorn study (256 subjects)The Netherlands (Caucasian) men and women 50-75 yrYes (I quartile: < 60.8 nmol/L)In this cohort there was an inverse correlation between 25(OH) vitamin D and both systolic and diastolic BP (P value for trend < 0.01 for both)
Skaaby et al[123]2012Cross-sectional 4330 subjects)Denmark (Caucasian) men and women 30-60 yrNo (I quartile: < 33 nmol/L)Mean 25(OH) vitamin D levels did not differed between hypertensive and normotensive subjects. There was not increased prevalence of hypertension in vitamin D deficient subjects
Kruger et al[124]2013Cross-sectional form the PURE study (291 African women)All over the world countries (African) women > 47 yrYes (vitamin D deficiency defined as < 30 nmol/L[125])Both systolic and diastolic BP correlated linearly and inversely with serum 25(OH) vitamin D level (P < 0.05 for both). However, only systolic BP maintain statistical significance in multivariate analysis (P < 0.05).
Mateus-Hamdan et al[73]2013Cross-sectional (284 geriatric patients of which 106 hypertensive)France men and women mean age 85 ± 6 yrNo (linear correlation)Means PTH but not 25(OH) vitamin D levels are significant different in hypertensive compared to normotensive patients.
Ke et al[126]2013Cross-sectional from the ATBC (2271 subjects of which 1430 hypertensive)Finland (Caucasian) men and women 50-69 yrYes (I quartile: < 25 nmol/L)Serum 25(OH) vitamin D level has a significant and inverse association with systolic BP (P < 0.05), also if stratified in groups. Moreover, the lower group was associated with increased prevalence of hypertension in multivariate analysis (P value for trend < 0.05).
Table 2 Longitudinal studies addressing the association between vitamin D and blood pressure
Ref.YearStudy design and follow-up (sample size)Country (ethnicity)AgeCorrelation (lower reference range of 25(OH) vitamin D)Findings
Forman et al[129]2007Prospective observational nested case-control study from HPFS and NHS-2 4 yr (1811 subjects)United States (Caucasian) men 47-82 yr women 43-68 yrYes (vitamin D deficiency defined as < 37.5 nmol/L[130])Multivariate RR of incident hypertension among vitamin D deficient subject was 3.18 (95%CI: 1.39-7.29; P < 0.05)
Forouhi et al[131]2008Prospective observational from the Ely study 10 yr (534 subject)United Kingdom (Caucasian) men and women 40-69 yrNo (vitamin D deficiency defined as < 25 nmol/L)There were not significant changes in BP during the follow-up
Forman et al[132]2008Prospective observational nested case-control study from the NHS 2 7 yr (1484 normotensive women)United States (Caucasian) women: 32-52 yrYes (I quartile: < 21 nmol/L)Median 25(OH) vitamin D were lower in women developing hypertension (P < 0.01). Moreover, interquartile analysis showed significant and inverse correlation between 25(OH) vitamin D and hypertension (OR = 1.66, 95%CI: 1.11-2.48; P value for trend < 0.05)
Jorde et al[104]2010Prospective observational from the Tromsø Study 14 yr (4125 subjects not treated with anti-hypertensive drugs)Norway (Caucasian) men and women 25-84 yrNo (I quartile: < 41.4 nmol/L)At adjusted analysis, 25(OH) vitamin D did not predict future hypertension or increase in BP: Moreover there was not any association between change in serum 25(OH) vitamin D and BP
Anderson et al[133]2010Prospective observational average 1.3 yr (maximum 9.1 yr) (41497 subjects)United States men and women 34-76 yrYes (vitamin D deficiency defined as < 37.5 nmol/L)Lower 25(OH) vitamin D levels were associated with higher incidence of hypertension (HR = 1.62, 95%CI: 1.48-2.02; P < 0.01)
Griffin et al[134]2011Prospective observational from MBHMS 14 yr (559 women)United States (Caucasian) women 24-44 yrYes (vitamin D deficiency defined as < 80 nmol/L)25(OH) vitamin D insufficiency has an increased risk of systolic hypertension at multivariate analysis (OR = 3.0, 95%CI: 1.01-8.7; P < 0.05)
Margolis et al[135]2012Prospective observational from the WHI 7 yr (4863 post-menopausal women)United States (Caucasian, African, Hispanic, Asian and others) women 50-79 yrNo (I quartile: < 34.4 nmol/L)There was not significant linear or nonlinear trend in the risk of incident hypertension
Wang et al[136]2012Prospective observational form PHS 15.3 yr (1211 normotensive men)United States men 40-84 yrYes (I quartile: < 39.9 nmol/L)There was significant difference only between I and III quartile (HR = 0.69, 95%CI: 0.50-0.96; P < 0.05)
Skaaby et al[123]2012Prospective observational 5 yr (4330 subjects)Denmark (Caucasian) men and women 30-61 yrNo (I quartile: < 33 nmol/L)Multivariate logistic regression analyses did not show any association between 25(OH) vitamin D incidence rate of hypertension.
Ke et al[126]2013Prospective observational from the ATBC 4 yr (2271 subjects of which 1430 hypertensive)Finland (Caucasian) men and women 50-69 yrNo (I quartile: < 25 nmol/L)25(OH) vitamin D did not predict future hypertension.
Table 3 Randomized clinical trial investigating the protective effect of vitamin D supplementation on blood pressure
Ref.YearStudy designCountry (ethnicity)AgeInterventionFindings
Lint et al[137]1988(sample size) Prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial (65 men with glucose intolerance of which 26 hypertensive)Sweden (Caucasian) 61-65 yr(follow-up) α-calcidol 0.75 μg (12 wk)In hypertensive patients supplementation has addictive effect to concomitant antihypertensive therapy in reducing BP (P < 0.01). In the whole population there was only non-significant trend in BP lowering
Pan et al[138]1993Prospective randomized double-blind 2 × 2 interventional trial (58 institutionalized elderly persons)Taiwan (Asian) not providedcalcium 800 mg/d or 1,25(OH)2 vitamin D 5 μg/d or calcium 800 mg/d + 1,25(OH)2 vitamin D 5 μg/d, or placebo (11 wk)Any type of supplementation failed to reduce BP
Scragg et al[139]1995Prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial (189 elderly subjects)United Kingdom (not provided) 63-76 yr25(OH) vitamin D 2.5 μg/d or placebo (5 wk)Although treatment was effective in increasing serum 1,25(OH)2 vitamin D (P < 0.01) and decreasing PTH (P < 0.01), there was not difference in BP change
Krause et al[140]1998Prospective randomized double-blind controlled trial (18 patients with untreated mild essential hypertension)Germany (Caucasian) 26-66 yrFull body UVB or UVA thrice weekly (6 wk)In accordance with a 162% rise in plasmatic 25(OH) vitamin D (P < 0.01) and 15% fall in serum PTH (P < 0.01), the UVB group showed also a reduction in 24-h ambulatory systolic and diastolic BP (P < 0.01)
Pfeifer et al[141]2001Prospective randomized double-blind controlled trial (148 elderly subject with 25(OH)D < 50 nmol/L)Germany (Caucasian) 70-86 yrCalcium 600 mg × 2/d or calcium 600 mg + 25(OH) vitamin D 10 μg twice daily (8 wk)In accordance with a 72% rise in plasmatic 25(OH) vitamin D (P < 0.01) and 17% fall in serum PTH (P < 0.05), combined supplementation significantly reduced systolic BP (P < 0.05)
Sudgen et al[142]2008Prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial (34 elderly type 2 diabetic patients with 25(OH)D < 50 nmol/L)United Kingdom (not provided)Loading dose ergocalciferol 2500 μg or placebo (8 wk)Supplementation significantly rise plasmatic 25(OH) vitamin D (P < 0.01) and reduced systolic BP, whereas there was only a trend in diastolic BP decrease
Alborzi et al[143]2008Prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial (24 elderly type 2 diabetic patients with 25(OH)D < 50 nmol/L)mean 64 years United States (Caucasian and African Americans) 56-80 yrParicalcitol 1 or 2 μg/d or placebo (4 wk)Any dose of paricalcitol failed to reduce BP
Margolis et al[144]2008Prospective randomized double-blind controlled trial (36282 n post-menopausal women from WHI study)United States (Caucasian, Asian, Hispanic, African American) 50-79 yrCalcium 500 mg × 2/d or calcium 500 mg + 25(OH) vitamin D 5 μg twice daily (7 yr)There was no significant difference in over time change of BP in the whole population. In addition, supplementation failed to reduce the risk of developing hypertension in non-hypertensive patients at baseline
Nagpal et al[145]2008Prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial (71 older overweight men )India (Indian population) 36-54 yr25(OH) vitamin D 3000 μg every 2 wk for 3 times or placebo (7 wk)Supplementation failed to reduce BP
Daly et al[146]2009Prospective randomized double-blind controlled trial (124 community-dwelling men)Australia (Caucasian) 55-69 yrMilk fortified with calcium (500 mg) and 25(OH) vitamin D (10 μg) twice a day or standard milk (2 yr)Supplementation failed to reduce BP
Hilpert et al[147]2009Prospective randomized double-blind controlled trial (23 hypertensive adults)United States (not provided)Dairy-rich, high fruits and vegetables diet or a high fruits and vegetables diet or an average Western diet (5 wk)High fruits and vegetables diet dairy-rich or not significantly reduced BP (P < 0.05). Moreover, in dairy-rich, high fruits and vegetables diet there was a greater lowering of intracellular calcium (P < 0.01), strongly associated with fall in diastolic BP (P < 0.05)
Witham et al[148]2010Prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial (56 patients with history of stroke and baseline 25(OH)D < 75 nmol/L)United Kingdom (not provided) 53-79 yrLoading dose ergocalciferol 2500 μg or placebo (8 and 16 wk)Supplementation significantly increased serum 25(OH) vitamin D to both controls (P < 0.01). However, treatment failed to reduced BP
Witham et al[149]2010Prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial (61 patients with type 2 diabetes and baseline 25(OH)D < 100 nmol/L)United Kingdom (not provided) 55-76 yrLoading dose ergocalciferol 2500 μg or 5000 μg or placebo (8 and 16 wk)Supplementation significantly increased serum 25(OH) vitamin D to both controls (P < 0.01 for both). However, supplementation failed to reduced BP
Judd et al[150]2010Prospective randomized double-blind controlled trial (9 patients with baseline 25(OH)D within 25 and 75 nmol/L in addition to systolic BP between 130 and 150 mmHg)United States (African American) mean 45 yrloading dose ergocalciferol 2500 μg or placebo weekly for 3 wk or 25 (OH) vitamin D 0.5 μg twice a day for 1 wk (3 wk)Only supplementation with 25(OH) vitamin D decrease by 9% mean systolic BP (P < 0.01) in accordance with rise of serum 25(OH) vitamin D (P < 0.05)
Scragg et al[151]2011Prospective randomized double-blind controlled trial (119 patients with baseline 25(OH)D < 50 nmol)New Zealand (Pacific islander, Caucasian and Maori) 23-87 yr24 whole body exposures of either UVB or ultraviolet A (6 and 12 wk)In the UVB arm there was a significant increase in serum 25 (OH) vitamin D after both 6 and 12 wk (P < 0.01 for both). However, treatment failed to reduced BP
Salehpour et al[152]2012Prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial (77 pre-menopausal overweight and obese women)Iran (Arabian) 30-46 yr25 (OH) vitamin D 25 μg daily or placebo (12 wk)Supplementation significantly rise plasmatic 25 (OH) vitamin D (P < 0.01) and fall PTH (P < 0.01). Moreover, although treatment improved lipid profile, there was no effect on BP
Gepner et al[153]2012Prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial (110 post-menopausal women with baseline 25(OH)D within 10 and 60 nmol/L)United States (not provided) 60-67 yr25 (OH) vitamin D 62.5 μg daily or placebo (16 wk)Supplementation, although significantly raised serum 25(OH) vitamin D (P < 0.01), failed in improving BP control assessed by changes in FMD, PWV and Aix
Wood et al[154]2012Prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial (305 healthy post-menopausal women)United Kingdom (not provided) 48-72 yr25 (OH) vitamin D 10 μg or 25 μg/d or placebo (1 yr)Supplementation failed in improving CV risk profile, including BP control
Larsen et al[155]2012Prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial (112 hypertensive patients)Denmark (Caucasian) 48-72 yr25 (OH) vitamin D 75 μg/d or placebo (20 wk)Supplementation significantly rise plasmatic 25 (OH) vitamin D (P < 0.01) and fall PTH (P < 0.01) but failed in improving BP control. However, in a post-hoc subgroup analysis of patient with 25 (OH) vitamin D deficiency at baseline supplementation significantly decrease 24-h systolic and diastolic BP (P < 0.05)
Zhu et al[156]2013Prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial (43 healthy subjects)China (Asian) 20-22 yrCalcium 600 mg + 25 (OH) vitamin D 3.12 μg daily or placebo, in addition to 500 kcal/d of caloric deficit (7 yr)Except a reduction in visceral fat mass, supplementation failed in improving CV risk profile, including BP control
Forman et al[157]2013Prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial (283 healthy black subjects)United States (African American) mean 51 yr25 (OH) vitamin D 25 μg or 50 or 100 μg/d or placebo (12 and 24 wk)Supplementation significantly decrease BP consistent with increasing dose (P < 0.05). Moreover, there was linear correlation between systolic BP decrease and rise of serum 25 (OH) vitamin D (P < 0.05)
Witham et al[158]2013Prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial (159 with isolate systolic hypertension)United States (not provided) mean 77 yrLoading dose 25 (OH) vitamin D 2500 μg or placebo (12, 24 and 36 wk)Supplementation significantly rise plasmatic 25 (OH) vitamin D (P < 0.01) but failed in improving BP control. Moreover, treatment failed to achieve secondary outcomes including 24-h blood pressure, arterial stiffness and endothelial function