Nelson JT, Liu L. Pharmacoepidemiologic study of association between apparent treatment resistant hypertension, cardiovascular disease and interaction effect by sex and age. World J Cardiol 2023; 15(5): 262-272 [PMID: 37274374 DOI: 10.4330/wjc.v15.i5.262]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Longjian Liu, MD, MSc, PhD, Doctor, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, 3215 Market ST, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States. ll85@drexel.edu
Research Domain of This Article
Health Care Sciences & Services
Article-Type of This Article
Observational Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Cardiol. May 26, 2023; 15(5): 262-272 Published online May 26, 2023. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v15.i5.262
Table 1 Baseline characteristics overall and by apparent treatment resistant hypertension status, n (%)
Overall
Resistant hypertension
Yes
No
P value
Total
25516
2329 (9.1)
23187 (90.9)
Treatment group
< 0.001
Chlorthalidone
11808 (46.3)
853 (36.6)
10955 (47.3)
Amlodipine
6955 (27.3)
554 (23.8)
6401 (27.6)
Lisinopril
6753 (26.5)
922 (39.6)
5831 (25.2)
Race
< 0.001
White
15397 (60.3)
1272 (54.6)
14125 (60.9)
African American
8808 (34.5)
953 (40.9)
7855 (33.9)
Am. Indian/Alaskan Native
58 (0.2)
3 (0.1)
55 (0.2)
Asian/Pacific Islander
312 (1.2)
26 (1.1)
286 (1.2)
Other
941 (3.7)
75 (3.2)
866 (3.7)
Hispanic
4485 (17.6)
204 (8.8)
4281 (18.5)
< 0.001
Sex
< 0.001
Male
13597 (53.3)
1333 (57.2)
12264 (52.9)
Female
11919 (46.7)
996 (42.8)
10923 (47.1)
Geographic region
< 0.001
East
3917 (15.4)
337 (14.5)
3580 (15.4)
Midwest
4736 (18.6)
449 (19.3)
4287 (18.5)
South
10603 (41.6)
1165 (50.0)
9438 (40.7)
West
2635 (10.3)
254 (10.9)
2381 (10.3)
Canada
461 (1.8)
33 (1.4)
428 (1.9)
PR/VI
3164 (12.4)
91 (3.9)
3073 (13.3)
Preventive HTN treat
23033 (90.3)
2242 (96.3)
20791 (89.7)
< 0.001
Obese
10604 (41.6)
1085 (46.6)
9519 (41.1)
< 0.001
History of MI or stroke
5499 (21.6)
498 (21.4)
5001 (21.6)
0.84
History of coronary revascularization
3016 (11.8)
327 (14.0)
2689 (11.6)
< 0.001
Type 2 diabetes
8975 (35.2)
1061 (45.6)
7914 (34.1)
< 0.001
left ventricular hypertrophy
5110 (20.0)
551 (23.7)
4559 (19.7)
< 0.001
History of CHD
5981 (23.6)
534 (23.2)
5447 (23.7)
0.61
Smoking status
< 0.001
Current
5491 (21.5)
423 (18.2)
5068 (21.9)
Past
10394 (40.7)
992 (42.6)
9402 (40.6)
Never
9631 (37.7)
914 (39.2)
8717 (37.6)
Aspirin use
9084 (35.6)
922 (39.6)
8162 (35.2)
< 0.001
Estrogen use (in women)
2230 (18.7)
182 (18.3)
2048 (18.8)
0.84
Age (years) (mean ± SD)
66.6 ± 7.5
67 ± 7.5
67 ± 7.5
0.78
BMI (kg/m2) (mean ± SD)
29.7 ± 5.9
30 ± 5.9
30 ± 5.9
< 0.001
SBP (mm Hg) (mean ± SD)
146.0 ± 15.6
152 ± 15.1
145 ± 15.5
< 0.001
DBP (mm Hg) (mean ± SD)
84.0 ± 10.0
85 ± 10.6
84 ± 9.9
0.001
Cholesterol (mean ± SD)
215.7 ± 42.5
216 ± 44.8
216 ± 42.2
0.79
GFR
78.0 ± 19.3
75 ± 20.6
78 ± 19.2
< 0.001
Table 2 Hazard ratios of apparent treatment resistant hypertension for cardiovascular disease risk and sensitivity analyses
Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
HR
95%CI
HR
95%CI
HR
95%CI
aTRH
1.51
1.39
1.64
1.49
1.37
1.62
1.3
1.19
1.42
Sensitivity analyses
Propensity score
1.33
1.20
1.48
Multiple imputation sensitivity analysis
1.24
1.16
1.33
CHD
1.56
1.29
1.89
Without uncontrolled on < 3 drugs
1.3
1.18
1.44
Table 3 Joint effects for interaction of sex and apparent treatment resistant hypertension, and age and apparent treatment resistant hypertension on cardiovascular disease risk
aTRH (No)
aTRH (Yes)
HR
(95%CI)
HR
(95%CI)
HR (95%CI) by sex
Sex
Female
Reference
1.67
(1.45, 1.91)
1.64 (1.43, 1.88)
Male
1.25
(1.16, 1.34)
1.39
(1.12, 1.56)
1.13 (1.01, 1.27)
HR (95%CI) (M vs F)
1.25
(1.16, 1.35)
0.80
(0.66, 0.97)
RERI (95%CI)
-0.52
(-0.75, 0.25)
Interaction of sex and aTRH on CVD: P < 0.0001
HR (95%CI) by age
Age
< 65
Reference
1.56
(1.42, 1.71)
1.53 (1.32, 1.77)
≥ 65
1.38
(1.31, 1.45)
1.61
(1.48, 1.73)
1.18 (1.05, 1.32)
≥ 65 vs < 65
1.37
(1.28, 1.47)
1.05
(0.87, 1.27)
RERI (95%CI)
-0.339
(-0.61, 0.06)
Interaction of age and aTRH on CVD: P = 0.0326
Table 4 Joint impact of age, sex, and apparent treatment resistant hypertension on cardiovascular disease and coronary heart disease risk
Sex
Age
HR
(95%CI)
Risk for CVD
aTRH
No
Female
< 65
Reference
No
Male
< 65
1.55
(1.43-1.67)
No
Female
65+
1.68
(1.56-1.79)
No
Male
65+
1.95
1.70-2.20)
Yes
Male
65+
1.85
(1.22-2.48)
Yes
Female
< 65
1.88
(1.64-2.11)
Yes
Male
< 65
2.17
(1.76-2.58)
Yes
Female
65+
2.61
(2.20-3.01)
Three-way interaction of sex, age, and aTRH on CVD, P = 0.2841
Risk for CHD
aTRH
No
Female
< 65
Reference
No
Male
< 65
1.72
(1.57-1.86)
No
Female
65+
1.59
(1.44-1.74)
No
Male
65+
2.1
(1.77-2.42)
Yes
Male
65+
2.12
(1.28-2.97)
Yes
Female
< 65
1.79
(1.47-2.11)
Yes
Male
< 65
2.37
(1.82-2.92)
Yes
Female
65+
2.53
(1.98-3.08)
Three-way interaction of sex, age, and aTRH on CHD, P = 0.4246
Citation: Nelson JT, Liu L. Pharmacoepidemiologic study of association between apparent treatment resistant hypertension, cardiovascular disease and interaction effect by sex and age. World J Cardiol 2023; 15(5): 262-272