Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Cardiol. Dec 26, 2023; 15(12): 633-641
Published online Dec 26, 2023. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v15.i12.633
Published online Dec 26, 2023. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v15.i12.633
Table 1 General data for patients (mean ± SD), n (%)
Overall (n = 130) | Study group (n = 72) | Control group (n = 58) | P value | |
Age (yr) | 73 ± 10 | 72 ± 11 | 74 ± 6 | 0.42 |
Males | 78 (60) | 40 (56) | 38 (66) | 0.09 |
Heart rate (bpm) | 72 ± 16 | 71 ± 16 | 72 ± 17 | 0.01a |
Systolic pressure (mmHg) | 114 ± 21 | 114 ± 20 | 119 ± 22 | 0.27 |
Diastolic pressure (mmHg) | 73 ± 16 | 71 ± 9 | 76 ± 7 | 0.14 |
LVEF (%) | 77 ± 15 | 77 ± 10 | 75 ± 11 | 0.47 |
Creatinine (mmol/L) | 100 ± 52 | 92 ± 44 | 99 ± 40 | 0.21 |
Arterial high pressure | 10 (8) | 6 (8) | 4 (7) | 0.62 |
Diabetes mellitus | 22 (17) | 13 (18) | 9 (16) | 0.76 |
Dyslipidemia | 44 (34) | 25 (35) | 19(33) | 0.22 |
Current smoking | 50 (38) | 24 (33) | 26(45) | 0.62 |
Antithrombotics | ||||
Aspirin | 84(65) | 50(69) | 34 (59) | 0.11 |
Clopidogrel | 46 (35) | 26 (36) | 20 (34) | 0.50 |
Direct oral anticoagulant | 6 (5) | 4(6) | 2(3) | 0.42 |
Table 2 Comparison of cardiac function before and after treatment in both groups (mean ± SD)
Group | LVEF, % | CO, L/min | BNP, ng/L | CRP, mg/L | ||||
Control group | Study group | Control group | Study group | Control group | Study group | Control group | Study group | |
Pretherapy | 43.3 ± 2.2 | 47.3 ± 2.2 | 4.8 ± 0.0 | 5.2 ± 0.3 | 724.5 ± 42.5 | 405.7 ± 57.4 | 17.4 ± 3.4 | 11.2 ± 1.2 |
Post-treatment | 44.7 ± 4.1 | 54.5 ± 4.6 | 4.9 ± 0.2 | 5.6 ± 0.4 | 711.5 ± 33.4 | 282.6 ± 44.3 | 17.6 ± 3.2 | 8.4 ± 1.2 |
t | 0.6 | 14.2 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 31.7 | 296.5 | 4.7 | 5.1 |
P value | 0.25 | 0.01a | 0.38 | 0.04a | 0.03a | 0.00a | 0.60 | 0.03a |
Table 3 Comparison of cardiac function before and after treatment between both groups (mean ± SD)
Group | CCS angina grade (score) | SAQ grade (score) | 6WMT (m) | |||
Control group | Study group | Control group | Study group | Control group | Study group | |
Pretherapy | 1.6 ± 0.5 | 1.0 ± 0.5 | 66.4 ± 12.5 | 60.9 ± 16.0 | 352.4 ± 100.2 | 414.2 ± 84.1 |
Post-treatment | 1.3 ± 0.7 | 1.8 ± 0.5 | 68.3 ± 10.7 | 63.3 ± 16.3 | 385.0 ± 110.1 | 371.2 ± 85.2 |
t | 2.8 | 13.2 | 28.5 | 33.6 | 28.7 | 225.1 |
P value | 0.76 | 0.02a | 0.36 | 0.53 | 0.85 | 0.01a |
Table 4 Comparison of blood lipid levels before and after treatment (mean ± SD)
Group | LDL (mmol/L) | HDL (mmol/L) | TC (mmol/L) | TG (mmol/L) | ||||
Control group | Study group | Control group | Study group | Control group | Study group | Control group | Study group | |
Pretherapy | 3.6 ± 1.4 | 1.6 ± 3.1 | 1.3 ± 0.0 | 1.2 ± 0.3 | 9.0 ± 3.8 | 7.3 ± 1.4 | 6.2 ± 1.6 | 4.6 ± 0.6 |
Post-treatment | 3.0 ± 2.1 | 1.4 ± 3.7 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 1.3 ± 0.4 | 8.7 ± 2.2 | 5.2 ± 0.9 | 6.5 ± 1.4 | 3.2 ± 0.9 |
t | 0.6 | 4.2 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 1.7 | 3.5 | 4.7 | 3.1 |
P value | 0.26 | 0.54 | 0.18 | 0.11 | 0.32 | 0.01a | 0.60 | 0.03a |
Table 5 Logistic regression analysis of therapeutic effects of Pericarpium Trichosanthis injection combined with nicorandil
Variable | SE | Wald χ2 | P value | OR (95%CI) |
LDL | 1.12 | 1.26 | 0.03 | 0.30 (0.08-0.49) |
HDL | 0.58 | 0.90 | 0.47 | 1.21 (1.02-1.87) |
TG | 1.87 | 3.60 | 0.05 | 0.57 (0.24-0.75) |
TC | 1.79 | 0.33 | 0.04 | 0.65 (0.43-0.69) |
LVEF | 0.05 | 0.70 | 0.01 | 1.16 (1.00-1.27) |
CO | 0.08 | 0.65 | 0.01 | 1.83 (1.02-2-36) |
BNP | 2.75 | 5.60 | 0.03 | 0.44 (0.10-0.64) |
CRP | 0.85 | 3.15 | 0.54 | 0.76 (0.23-0.95) |
- Citation: Li J, Kong MW, Xie YY, Wang ZB, Xu L, He GX. Efficacy and prognostic impact of Pericarpium Trichosanthis injection combined with nicorandil for intractable angina pectoris in elderly patients: A retrospective study. World J Cardiol 2023; 15(12): 633-641
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v15/i12/633.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v15.i12.633