Retrospective Cohort Study Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Cardiol. Jul 26, 2024; 16(7): 402-411
Published online Jul 26, 2024. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v16.i7.402
Rates, predictors, and causes of readmission after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with chronic kidney disease
Taha Teaima, Gianfranco Bittar Carlini, Rohan A Gajjar, Imran Aziz, Sami J Shoura, Abdul-Rahim Shilbayeh, Naim Battikh, Tareq Alyousef, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, IL 60612, United States
ORCID number: Sami J Shoura (0000-0001-5015-0814); Tareq Alyousef (0000-0002-7437-1600).
Author contributions: Teaima T and Alyousef T conceptualized the research idea and designed the study; Teaima T curated data from database and performed statistical anylysis, Gajjar RA contributed with data analysis; Teaima T, Carlini GB, Gajjar RA, Aziz I, Shoura SJ wrote the original manuscript draft; Shilbayeh AR and Battikh N contributed with manuscript review and further editing; Teaima T and Alyousef T supervised all the tasks. All authors have read and approve the final manuscript.
Institutional review board statement: This manuscript is exempt from Institutional Review Board approval, as national readmission database is a de-identified national administrative database and is readily available online at https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov.
Informed consent statement: National readmission database is a de-identified national administrative database and is readily available online no informed consent was required.
Conflict-of-interest statement: We have no financial relationships to disclose.
Data sharing statement: National readmission database is a de-identified national administrative database and is readily available online at https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov.
STROBE statement: The authors have read the STROBE Statement-checklist of items, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the STROBE Statement-checklist of items.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Tareq Alyousef, MD, Staff Physician, Department of Cardiology, John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County, 1969 W Ogden Ave, Chicago, IL 60612, United States. talyousef@cookcountyhhs.org
Received: February 13, 2024
Revised: May 9, 2024
Accepted: June 6, 2024
Published online: July 26, 2024
Processing time: 161 Days and 19.5 Hours

Abstract
BACKGROUND

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a revolutionary procedure for severe aortic stenosis. The coexistence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and TAVR introduces a challenge that significantly impacts patient outcomes.

AIM

To define readmission rates, predictors, and causes after TAVR procedure in CKD stage 1-4 patients.

METHODS

We used the national readmission database 2018 and 2020 to look into readmission rates, causes and predictors after TAVR procedure in patients with CKD stage 1-4.

RESULTS

Out of 24758 who underwent TAVR and had CKD, 7892 (32.4%) patients were readmitted within 90 days, and had higher adjusted odds of being females (adjusted odds ratio: 1.17, 95%CI: 1.02-1.31, P = 0.02) with longer length of hospital stay > 6 days, and more comorbidities including but not limited to diabetes mellitus, anemia, and congestive heart failure (CHF).

CONCLUSION

Most common causes of readmission included CHF (18.0%), sepsis, and complete atrioventricular block. Controlling readmission predictors with very close follow-up is warranted to prevent such high rate of readmission.

Key Words: Chronic kidney disease; Transcatheter aortic valve replacement; Readmission; Predictors; Rates

Core Tip: Our analysis of national readmission database for year 2018 to 2020 for 90 days readmissions for patients with chronic kidney disease stage 1-4 undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement showed considerably higher readmission rate to 32.4%. Majority were females and had higher comorbidity burden. Most common cause of 90 days readmission was congestive heart failure. Hence, we recommend optimization of co-morbidities and close follow up after index admission to prevent high rate of readmissions.



INTRODUCTION

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged over the years as a revolutionary less invasive option than surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis (AS) in patients who are either above 65 years of age or deemed intermediate to high-risk or inoperable for traditional open-heart surgery[1-3]. This groundbreaking technique offers a ray of hope for individuals with multiple medical co-morbidities who suffer from aortic valve degeneration.

However, the convergence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and TAVR introduces a complex interplay of medical challenges that significantly impact patient outcomes. As the prevalence of both CKD and AS continue to rise[4,5], understanding the multifaceted relationship between these conditions becomes paramount in optimizing treatment strategies and improving patient care.

The prevalence of CKD is particularly high in elderly populations[6], a demographic that frequently coincides with AS. One study reported a pooled estimate of 12.4% in patients aged ≥ 75 years due to age-related valve degeneration[7,8]. As such, the encounter between CKD and AS is becoming increasingly common. Available literature indicates that presence of CKD or end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is associated with a higher risk of mortality[9,10].

To our knowledge, our study is the first to utilize a large population-based database to describe the effects of co-existence of CKD stage 1-4 on the readmission after TAVR procedure in conjunction with causes and predictors of readmission. Identifying these predictors and causes, and addressing them can establish a base-ground to limit readmission rates after TAVR in patients with CKD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The national readmission database (NRD) 2018 and 2020 was employed for this retrospective cohort study. NRD is one of the largest publicly available all-payer inpatient healthcare databases in the United States. The database is sustained by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. It is structured as a weighted probability sample to obtain an approximate sample that statistically represents all hospitalizations in all non-federal acute care hospitals nationwide, excluding rehabilitation facilities and long-term acute care hospitals. Data was obtained from billing data submitted by hospitals to statewide data organizations, representing about 97% of the United States populace. These hospitalizations are then classified based on urban/rural divisions, hospital teaching status, geographic location, and bed size. Data from 20% of all hospitalizations in these strata are then collected, pooled, and weighted to guarantee that it is representative of the United States population.

The NRD database is entirely coded using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM)/Procedure Coding System. It includes patient and hospital-level information such as primary diagnosis, secondary diagnosis, median household income, primary payer type, hospital teaching status, hospital bed size, geographic region, and urban/rural location. Diagnoses are then sorted into a single principal diagnosis, and the remaining diagnoses are considered secondary diagnoses. The principal diagnosis corresponds to the main International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) code for hospitalization, and the secondary diagnoses are any other ICD-10 codes besides the principal diagnosis that were tied to the hospitalization.

The study population exclusively consists of adult patients over 18 years hospitalized for TAVR procedure and had co-diagnosis of CKD stage 1-4. Multiple ICD-10-CM codes for TAVR procedure (02RF37Z, 02RF38Z, 02RF3JZ, 02RF3KZ) and CKD stage 1-4 (N181, N182, N183, N184) were used to create our subpopulation. ICD-10 codes used in this study were obtained from a literature review of similar validated analyses. The population included in the analysis is outlined in (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Figure 1 Flow chart of Readmission rates after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in chronic kidney disease stage 1-4 patient. TAVR: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement; CKD: Chronic kidney disease.

The study variables include demographic characteristics such as age, gender, mean household income, and medical insurance status. Hospital characteristics such as teaching status, and bed size are also included in the database. Comorbidity burden was assessed using the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), adjusted for population-based research, and ICD-10-CM coding for each comorbidity to generate baseline patient characteristics.

The primary study outcome in our analysis was the readmission rates after TAVR procedure in patients with CKD stage 1-4 and most common causes of readmission. Secondary outcomes include adjusted odds of readmission predictors. Analysis STATA® (StataCorp, College Station, TX, United States) version 17 was utilized to perform the statistical analysis. Year-based discharge weights provided by the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) were used to calculate weighted national estimates. Categorical variables proportions were compared using the Chi-square test. An independent sample t-test was used to evaluate the means of continuous data. The unadjusted odds ratio (OR) was calculated using univariate regression analysis for each outcome. Based on the significance of each univariate screen (P < 0.2), we selected variables to perform the multivariable logistic regression analysis to adjust for possible confounders. Other essential variables based on the literature review were included in the model. Logistic regression was used for binary or categorical outcomes, and linear regression analysis was used for continuous outcomes. All P-values were two-tailed, and we used a threshold of 0.05 to determine significance.

This manuscript is exempt from Institutional Review Board approval, as NRD is a de-identified national administrative database and is readily available online at https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov. Based on this exemption and according to the HCUP guidelines, our study did not require Cook County Health Institutional Review Board approval.

RESULTS

Out of 24758 adults who underwent TAVR and had co-diagnosis of CKD stage 1-4, 24375 (98.4%) discharged alive. Out of these and within 90 days of discharge, 7892 (32.4%) patients were readmitted (Figure 1). Readmitted patients were more likely to be females (42.5 % vs 39.3%, P = 0.018) with longer length of stay (LOS) > 6 days during index admission (34.8% vs 19.0%, P < 0.001), and had 3 or more comorbidities according to CCI (36.7% vs 26.0%, P < 0.001). Readmitted patients were more likely to have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (28.0% vs 23.3%, P < 0.001), diabetes mellitus (DM) (52.9% vs 46.9%, P < 0.001), malignancy (10.2% vs 6.5%, P < 0.001), peripheral arterial disease (PAD) (12.3% vs 10.6%, P = 0.013), atrial flutter or atrial fibrillation ( 33.4% vs 24.9%, P < 0.001), anemia (49.3% vs 37.7%, P < 0.001), and to be malnourished (4.5% vs 2.6%, P < 0.001) (Table 1). Most common causes of readmission were congestive heart failure (CHF) (18.0%), sepsis (4.6%), acute kidney injury (AKI) (3.4%), complete atrioventricular block (3.2%), paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (1.4%), pneumonia (1.2%), and gastrointestinal bleeding (1.2%) (Figure 2).

Figure 2
Figure 2  Most common causes of readmission.
Table 1 The baseline characteristics of the patients who were readmitted, and those who were not readmitted during index admission, n (%).
Patient population
Patients underwent TAVR and were discharged alive with no readmission in 90 days (n = 16483) (67.6)
Patients underwent TAVR and were discharged alive with readmission in 90 days (n = 7892) (32.4)
P value
18-440 (0)0 (0)0.2890
45-64544 (3.3)229 (2.9)
≥ 6515939 (96.7)7663 (97.1)
    Female6478 (39.3)3354 (42.5)0.0018
    Male10005 (60.7)4538 (57.5)
Insurance status
    Medicaid15395 (93.4)7426 (94.1)0.5559
    Medicare164 (1.0)71 (0.9)
    Private890 (5.4)379 (4.8)
    Self-pay33 (0.2)16 (0.2)
Length of stay
    Less than 3 days10285 (62.4)3528 (44.7)< 0.001
    3 to 6 days3065 (18.6)1618 (20.5)
    More than 6 days3131 (19.0)2746 (34.8)
Hospital bed size
    Small807 (4.9)379 (4.8)0.9935
    Medium3955 (24.0)1894 (24.0)
    Large11719 (71.1)5619 (71.2)
Teaching hospital14653 (88.9)7000 (88.7)0.7673
Non-teaching hospital1830 (11.1)892 (11.3)
Urban hospital16335 (99.1)7805 (98.9)0.3680
Rural hospital148 (0.9)87 (1.1)
CCI
    No comorbidity1830 (11.1)1634 (20.7)< 0.001
    1 comorbidity5011 (30.4)1847 (23.4)
    2 comorbidities5357 (32.5)1515 (19.2)
    ≥ 3 comorbidities4286 (26.0)2896 (36.7)
Median household income
    First quartile ($1-$49999)3395 (20.6)1673 (21.2)0.3420
    Second quartile ($50000-$64999)4928 (29.9)2352 (29.8)
    Third quartile ($65000-$85999)4401 (26.7)2186 (27.7)
    Fourth quartile ($86000+)3758 (22.8)1681 (21.3)
Hypertension181 (1.1)79 (1.0)0.9876
Congestive heart failure13104 (79.5)6740 (85.4)< 0.001
Coronary artery disease12329 (74.8)5974 (75.7)0.3283
History of cerebrovascular accidents462 (2.8)260 (3.3)0.2142
Malnutrition429 (2.6)355 (4.5)< 0.001
COPD3841 (23.3)2210 (28.0)< 0.001
Obesity4055 (24.6)2036 (25.8)0.2091
Diabetes mellitus7731 (46.9)4175 (52.9)< 0.001
Dyslipidemia12873 (78.1)5769 (73.1)< 0.001
Cancer1071 (6.5)805 (10.2)< 0.001
Anemia6214 (37.7)3891 (49.3)< 0.001
Smoking6560 (39.8)3038 (38.5)0.2631
Peripheral arterial disease1747 (10.6)971 (12.3)0.0133
Cirrhosis280 (1.7)174 (2.2)0.0745
Alcohol abuse165 (1.0)95 (1.2)0.1668
Atrial fibrillation or flutter4104 (24.9)2636 (33.4)< 0.001
Vascular complications577 (3.5)450 (5.7)< 0.001
Pericardial complications 82 (0.5)110 (1.4)< 0.001
Cardiac complications346 (2.1)316 (4)< 0.001
Respiratory complications 214 (1.3)189 (2.4)< 0.001
Infectious complications 742 (4.5)576 (7.3)< 0.001
Gastrointestinal complications 143 (0.87)77 (0.97)0.4053
Neurological complications 59 (0.36)36 (0.46)0.3743
Skin related complications 138 (0.84)118 (1.5)0.0012
Cardiac tamponade 59 (0.36)70 (0.89)0.0001
Post operative bleeding 155 (0.94)89 (1.13)0.4053

On multivariate regression analysis, readmitted patients had higher adjusted odds of longer hospital stay during index admission > 6 days [adjusted OR (aOR): 1.3, 95%CI: 1.15-1.40, P < 0.001], higher adjusted odds of being admitted to skilled nursing facility after index admission (aOR: 1.37, 95%CI: 1.22-1.52, P < 0.001), and females had higher adjusted odds of readmission (aOR: 1.17, 95%CI: 1.02-1.31, P = 0.02). Readmitted patients had also higher adjusted odds of having DM (aOR: 1.27, 95%CI: 1.17-1.39, P < 0.001), anemia (aOR: 1.25, 95%CI: 1.14-1.37, P < 0.001), CHF (aOR: 1.25, 95%CI: 1.11-1.41, P < 0.001), atrial flutter or atrial fibrillation (aOR: 1.32, 95%CI: 1.20-1.45, P < 0.001), AKI during index admission (aOR: 1.18, 95%CI: 1.05-1.34, P = 0.006), and cardiac complications during index admission (aOR: 1.6, 95%CI: 1.22-2.04, P < 0.001) (Figure 3).

Figure 3
Figure 3  Forrest plot for predictors of readmission when adjusted for patient demographics, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics.

Covariates of the multivariate regression analysis included age, sex, length of hospital stay, discharge destination, DM, COPD, PAD, malnutrition, anemia, CHF, coronary artery disease, atrial flutter or atrial fibrillation, AKI during index admission, cardiac, respiratory, and vascular complications during index admission.

DISCUSSION

In our study, readmission rate post TAVR in CKD stage 1-4 patients was 32.4% with the most common cause being CHF (18.0%). Readmitted patients had higher adjusted odds of longer hospital stay during index admission > 6 days, higher adjusted odds of being discharged to skilled nursing facility, and females had slightly higher adjusted odds of readmission as compared to men. Readmitted patients also had higher adjusted odds of having DM, Anemia, CHF, atrial flutter or atrial fibrillation, AKI during index admission, and cardiac complications during index admission.

Our findings suggest a substantial coexistence of CHF and CKD in patients undergoing TAVR. Given that both CHF and CKD are independently associated with increased readmission rates in various medical contexts, it is plausible to hypothesize that their confluence significantly amplifies the risk of readmissions post TAVR. The intricate interplay between cardiac and renal functions might create a synergistic effect, resulting in a higher likelihood of adverse outcomes.

Moreover, CKD may complicate the management of CHF, influencing post-TAVR readmission rates. Patients with compromised renal function may exhibit altered responses to standard CHF therapies, potentially affecting the management of their cardiac condition. This prompts consideration of tailored treatment strategies for CHF in patients with CKD, aiming to optimize cardiac health, volume status before discharge to potentially reduce readmission rates.

In the current published literature, the rates for readmissions post-TAVR after 30-days and 90-days ranged around 14.6-20.9% and 24.1%-25.1%[11,12]. If analyzed on a system-based approach, cardiovascular causes represent the most common causes of readmission, estimated to represent 38%, of which a wide range of variation, 22.8%-30.4% represent heart failure readmissions[11,12], which is similar to our findings that CHF is the most common cause of readmission post TAVR in non-ESRD CKD patients (18.0%). TAVR readmissions have decreased in the past 5-6 years. This is attributed to the advancement of imaging, provider experience, and later-generation devices for valve deployment. Other reports describe a progressive increase in readmissions due to noncardiac causes by up to 34% within a mean 1.96-year follow-up. In contrast, cardiac causes progressively decreased to 20.5%[13-15]. Our study revealed a 32.4% readmission rate for patients with CKD but not ESRD, whereas ESRD patients showed a readmission rate of 34.4% in a separate study[16]. The continuity and progression of readmission rates across the renal disease continuum favor a direct correlation between worse renal function and higher readmission rates post TAVR. A major contributor could be the difficulty in optimizing fluid status in those patients. Efficient fluid management is critical in both CHF and CKD. Based on our findings, we think that appropriate fluid balance during and after TAVR is crucial, particularly for patients with concurrent CHF and CKD. An imbalance could exacerbate cardiac and renal stress, potentially contributing to readmissions. Tailoring fluid management protocols might be beneficial in mitigating this risk.

In our study, female sex carried a higher adjusted odds of readmission. Cardiovascular disparities between males and females have been widely described in the literature. These differences include medical therapy for heart failure, interventional and surgical procedures, anticoagulation, and even preventative cardiovascular care[17-19]. Higher rates of readmissions, in-hospital mortality during index presentation, and increased LOS in 90 days post-TAVR analysis in women compared to men in this setting are well supported and attributed to complex interactions between longevity, comorbidities, and disparities in care. Common comorbidities reported among women include pulmonary hypertension, hypertension, diabetes, and anemia[17]. Proposed mechanisms in the setting of AS include a higher incidence of concentric hypertrophy than men, diastolic dysfunction, and reduced preload and stroke volume[20-22].

Trend analyses have shown progressive decrease in in-hospital mortality, overall fatality, and LOS in patients undergoing TAVR for the past years[23,24]. Previous multivariate analyses have characterized LOS greater than 5 days and multiple comorbidities as predictors of early readmission post TAVR. The same report also found periprocedural AKI and CKD as predictors of both early readmissions and increased mortality[11]. Among readmitted patients our analysis showed a bimodal distribution where 44.7% of readmissions had index-LOS shorter than 3 days followed by 34.8% with LOS beyond 6 days. Considering that 62.4% of patients were discharged within 3 days post procedure, only patients with LOS > 6 days ties a statistically significant increase in 90-day readmission risk.

Decreased renal reserve predisposing to periprocedural AKI on CKD, decreased glomerular filtration rate, and higher diastolic dysfunction in patients with CKD have been demonstrated to play a role in longer admissions for these patients[16].

The prevalence of heart failure in patients with AS is estimated at 10% and represents the sole most common cause of readmissions post-TAVR[25,26]. Systolic dysfunction, as measured by stress-corrected midwall shortening, is an unfavorable prognostic factor in AS. An echographic study demonstrated left ventricular myocardial systolic dysfunction is common in asymptomatic AS patients with increased valvuloarterial afterload, whereas ejection fraction is generally preserved[21]. Despite known data with worse outcomes for SAVR in this population, TAVR has emerged as a reasonable alternative for afterload reduction in patients with severe AS associated with left ventricular ejection fraction < 50%, regardless of their surgical risk, and life expectancy < 20 years[27-30]. Heart failure readmissions post TAVR are associated with increased mortality and decreased quality of life compared to patients who do not require readmission. Additionally, the incidence of CHF readmissions 1 year post TAVR ranges from 9%-24%, and correlates with that of major trials for chronic systolic heart failure[31-33].

Our study showed that CKD patients with underlying CHF were more likely to experience all-cause 90-day readmissions post-TAVR (79.5% vs 85.4%). The proportion of patients with concomitant CHF in CKD patients occupies the higher half of the spectrum, regardless of risk for readmission. Readmitted patients significantly surpassed literature descriptions. Altogether, these findings support the coexistence of heart failure in CKD-patients as a particularly high-risk relationship for readmissions post TAVR[34]. Despite the mortality impact aortic valve replacement has brought into the natural course of disease for patients with AS, systolic dysfunction carries a baseline prognosis non-modifiable by TAVR. Ongoing clinical trials aim to determine net benefit from TAVR in patients with moderate AS and severe heart failure[35].

In our cohort, readmitted patients were more likely to have COPD. The incidence of COPD in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement is estimated to be around 22.7%-36%, with an approximate of 12%-13% with severe disease[36]. COPD significantly increases adverse outcomes in patients with TAVR, especially if associated with chronic hypoxic respiratory failure requiring home O2 supplementation. In such patients, mortality was 2.5-fold higher compared to their non-oxygen users counterparts[37,38]. Conflicting evidence exists regarding COPD and oxygen supplementation and readmissions in TAVR-patients as an independent variable[39].

Limitations

We encountered some limitations based on the nature of the NRD database. It is a retrospective database collected based on ICD-10 codes, which may not-in some cases - be the best representative of the actual figures due to possible human errors. NRD also has limitations regarding therapeutic medications, actual investigations, and lab values, which are not accounted for in this study, with the possibility of confounding. Despite these limitations, the long study period, huge sample size, and analysis techniques empowered this study to shed light on TAVR readmissions in CKD patients stage 1-4, which is encouraging for more large prospective, multicenteric and controlled studies.

CONCLUSION

Finally, with the increased utility of TAVR for AS in an aging patient population with multiple comorbidities, physicians should consider very early and close follow up for patients with CKD post TAVR especially those with higher number of readmission predictors or with more complications during index admission. Future studies are encouraged to investigate the utility of earlier follow up, and other preventative measures that can mitigate the increased rates of readmission experienced by this patient population.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Unsolicited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Cardiac and cardiovascular systems

Country of origin: United States

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific Quality: Grade C, Grade C

Novelty: Grade B, Grade B

Creativity or Innovation: Grade C, Grade C

Scientific Significance: Grade B, Grade C

P-Reviewer: Kurasawa S, Japan S-Editor: Qu XL L-Editor: A P-Editor: Wang WB

References
1.  Siemieniuk RA, Agoritsas T, Manja V, Devji T, Chang Y, Bala MM, Thabane L, Guyatt GH. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis at low and intermediate risk: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2016;354:i5130.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 83]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 92]  [Article Influence: 11.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Thourani VH, Kodali S, Makkar RR, Herrmann HC, Williams M, Babaliaros V, Smalling R, Lim S, Malaisrie SC, Kapadia S, Szeto WY, Greason KL, Kereiakes D, Ailawadi G, Whisenant BK, Devireddy C, Leipsic J, Hahn RT, Pibarot P, Weissman NJ, Jaber WA, Cohen DJ, Suri R, Tuzcu EM, Svensson LG, Webb JG, Moses JW, Mack MJ, Miller DC, Smith CR, Alu MC, Parvataneni R, D'Agostino RB Jr, Leon MB. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients: a propensity score analysis. Lancet. 2016;387:2218-2225.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 754]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 783]  [Article Influence: 97.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Writing Committee Members; Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP 3rd, Gentile F, Jneid H, Krieger EV, Mack M, McLeod C, O'Gara PT, Rigolin VH, Sundt TM 3rd, Thompson A, Toly C. 2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;77:e25-e197.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 969]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 857]  [Article Influence: 285.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  GBD Chronic Kidney Disease Collaboration. Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2020;395:709-733.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3239]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2993]  [Article Influence: 748.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Vavilis G, Bäck M, Occhino G, Trevisan M, Bellocco R, Evans M, Lindholm B, Szummer K, Carrero JJ. Kidney Dysfunction and the Risk of Developing Aortic Stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73:305-314.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 40]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 56]  [Article Influence: 11.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Stevens LA, Li S, Wang C, Huang C, Becker BN, Bomback AS, Brown WW, Burrows NR, Jurkovitz CT, McFarlane SI, Norris KC, Shlipak M, Whaley-Connell AT, Chen SC, Bakris GL, McCullough PA. Prevalence of CKD and comorbid illness in elderly patients in the United States: results from the Kidney Early Evaluation Program (KEEP). Am J Kidney Dis. 2010;55:S23-S33.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 175]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 191]  [Article Influence: 13.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Osnabrugge RL, Mylotte D, Head SJ, Van Mieghem NM, Nkomo VT, LeReun CM, Bogers AJ, Piazza N, Kappetein AP. Aortic stenosis in the elderly: disease prevalence and number of candidates for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis and modeling study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:1002-1012.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 652]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 821]  [Article Influence: 74.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Thaden JJ, Nkomo VT, Enriquez-Sarano M. The global burden of aortic stenosis. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2014;56:565-571.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 145]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 176]  [Article Influence: 17.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Gupta T, Goel K, Kolte D, Khera S, Villablanca PA, Aronow WS, Bortnick AE, Slovut DP, Taub CC, Kizer JR, Pyo RT, Abbott JD, Fonarow GC, Rihal CS, Garcia MJ, Bhatt DL. Association of Chronic Kidney Disease With In-Hospital Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10:2050-2060.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 82]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 95]  [Article Influence: 13.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Thourani VH, Forcillo J, Beohar N, Doshi D, Parvataneni R, Ayele GM, Kirtane AJ, Babaliaros V, Kodali S, Devireddy C, Szeto W, Herrmann HC, Makkar R, Ailawadi G, Lim S, Maniar HS, Zajarias A, Suri R, Tuzcu EM, Kapadia S, Svensson L, Condado J, Jensen HA, Mack MJ, Leon MB. Impact of Preoperative Chronic Kidney Disease in 2,531 High-Risk and Inoperable Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in the PARTNER Trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102:1172-1180.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 60]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 49]  [Article Influence: 6.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Kolte D, Khera S, Sardar MR, Gheewala N, Gupta T, Chatterjee S, Goldsweig A, Aronow WS, Fonarow GC, Bhatt DL, Greenbaum AB, Gordon PC, Sharaf B, Abbott JD. Thirty-Day Readmissions After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in the United States: Insights From the Nationwide Readmissions Database. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 106]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 116]  [Article Influence: 16.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Pajjuru VS, Thandra A, Guddeti RR, Walters RW, Jhand A, Andukuri VG, Alkhouli M, Spertus JA, Alla VM. Sex differences in mortality and 90-day readmission rates after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a nationwide analysis from the USA. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2022;8:135-142.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15]  [Article Influence: 5.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Senussi MH, Schindler J, Sultan I, Masri A, Navid F, Kliner D, Kilic A, Sharbaugh MS, Barakat A, Althouse AD, Lee JS, Gleason TG, Mulukutla SR. Long term mortality and readmissions after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2021;11:1002-1012.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Al-Khadra Y, Darmoch F, Moussa Pacha H, Soud M, Kaki A, Alraies MC, Kapadia S. Temporal Trends of 30-Day Readmission for Patients Undergoing Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Nationwide Cohort Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13:270-272.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Khan MS, Sreenivasan J, Lateef N, Abougergi MS, Greene SJ, Ahmad T, Anker SD, Fonarow GC, Butler J. Trends in 30- and 90-Day Readmission Rates for Heart Failure. Circ Heart Fail. 2021;14:e008335.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 35]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 114]  [Article Influence: 38.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Park DY, An S, Hanna JM, Wang SY, Cruz-Solbes AS, Kochar A, Lowenstern AM, Forrest JK, Ahmad Y, Cleman M, Damluji AA, Nanna MG. Readmission rates and risk factors for readmission after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with end-stage renal disease. PLoS One. 2022;17:e0276394.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Sobti NK, Yeo I, Cheung JW, Feldman DN, Amin NP, Paul TK, Ascunce RR, Mecklai A, Marcus JL, Subramanyam P, Wong SC, Kim LK. Sex-Based Differences in 30-Day Readmissions After Cardiac Arrest: Analysis of the Nationwide Readmissions Database. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11:e025779.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Hess CN, Rao SV, Kong DF, Aberle LH, Anstrom KJ, Gibson CM, Gilchrist IC, Jacobs AK, Jolly SS, Mehran R, Messenger JC, Newby LK, Waksman R, Krucoff MW. Embedding a randomized clinical trial into an ongoing registry infrastructure: unique opportunities for efficiency in design of the Study of Access site For Enhancement of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Women (SAFE-PCI for Women). Am Heart J. 2013;166:421-428.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 63]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 62]  [Article Influence: 5.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.   Cardiovascular Care of Women: Understanding the Disparities. Latest in Cardiology. 2020; Available from: https:// www.acc.org/Latest-in-Cardiology/Articles/2020/08/01/12/42/Feature-Cardiovascular-Care-of-Women-Understanding-the-Disparities.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
20.  Carroll JD, Carroll EP, Feldman T, Ward DM, Lang RM, McGaughey D, Karp RB. Sex-associated differences in left ventricular function in aortic stenosis of the elderly. Circulation. 1992;86:1099-1107.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 340]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 308]  [Article Influence: 9.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Cramariuc D, Cioffi G, Rieck AE, Devereux RB, Staal EM, Ray S, Wachtell K, Gerdts E. Low-flow aortic stenosis in asymptomatic patients: valvular-arterial impedance and systolic function from the SEAS Substudy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2:390-399.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 172]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 156]  [Article Influence: 10.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Lu X, Li Q, Deng J, Kang Y, Liang G, Deng L, Guo L, Ruan H, Peng Z, Li J, Tan N, Chen J, Liu J, Wang AY, Liu Y. Renal Insufficiency Increases the Combined Risk of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy and Dysfunction in Patients at High Risk of Cardiovascular Diseases. J Clin Med. 2023;12.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Grover FL, Vemulapalli S, Carroll JD, Edwards FH, Mack MJ, Thourani VH, Brindis RG, Shahian DM, Ruiz CE, Jacobs JP, Hanzel G, Bavaria JE, Tuzcu EM, Peterson ED, Fitzgerald S, Kourtis M, Michaels J, Christensen B, Seward WF, Hewitt K, Holmes DR Jr; STS/ACC TVT Registry. 2016 Annual Report of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69:1215-1230.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 372]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 391]  [Article Influence: 55.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Culler SD, Cohen DJ, Brown PP, Kugelmass AD, Reynolds MR, Ambrose K, Schlosser ML, Simon AW, Katz MR. Trends in Aortic Valve Replacement Procedures Between 2009 and 2015: Has Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Made a Difference? Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;105:1137-1143.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 58]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 62]  [Article Influence: 10.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Jean G, Van Mieghem NM, Gegenava T, van Gils L, Bernard J, Geleijnse ML, Vollema EM, El Azzouzi I, Spitzer E, Delgado V, Bax JJ, Pibarot P, Clavel MA. Moderate Aortic Stenosis in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;77:2796-2803.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 22]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 52]  [Article Influence: 17.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Zahid S, Din MTU, Khan MZ, Rai D, Ullah W, Sanchez-Nadales A, Elkhapery A, Khan MU, Goldsweig AM, Singla A, Fonarrow G, Balla S. Trends, Predictors, and Outcomes of 30-Day Readmission With Heart Failure After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Insights From the US Nationwide Readmission Database. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11:e024890.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Maes F, Lerakis S, Barbosa Ribeiro H, Gilard M, Cavalcante JL, Makkar R, Herrmann HC, Windecker S, Enriquez-Sarano M, Cheema AN, Nombela-Franco L, Amat-Santos I, Muñoz-García AJ, Garcia Del Blanco B, Zajarias A, Lisko JC, Hayek S, Babaliaros V, Le Ven F, Gleason TG, Chakravarty T, Szeto W, Clavel MA, de Agustin A, Serra V, Schindler JT, Dahou A, Salah-Annabi M, Pelletier-Beaumont E, Côté M, Puri R, Pibarot P, Rodés-Cabau J. Outcomes From Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Less Than 30%: A Substudy From the TOPAS-TAVI Registry. JAMA Cardiol. 2019;4:64-70.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 43]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 62]  [Article Influence: 15.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Une D, Mesana L, Chan V, Maklin M, Chan R, Masters RG, Mesana TG, Ruel M. Clinical Impact of Changes in Left Ventricular Function After Aortic Valve Replacement: Analysis From 3112 Patients. Circulation. 2015;132:741-747.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 60]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 68]  [Article Influence: 7.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Jalava MP, Savontaus M, Ahvenvaara T, Laakso T, Virtanen M, Niemelä M, Tauriainen T, Maaranen P, Husso A, Kinnunen E, Dahlbacka S, Jaakkola J, Rosato S, D'Errigo P, Laine M, Mäkikallio T, Raivio P, Eskola M, Valtola A, Juvonen T, Biancari F, Airaksinen J, Anttila V. Transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022;17:322.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Mesnier J, Panagides V, Nuche J, Rodés-Cabau J. Evolving Indications of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement-Where Are We Now, and Where Are We Going. J Clin Med. 2022;11.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14]  [Article Influence: 7.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Huded CP, Arnold SV, Chhatriwalla AK, Saxon JT, Kapadia S, Yu X, Webb JG, Thourani VH, Kodali SK, Smith CR, Mack MJ, Leon MB, Cohen DJ. Rehospitalization Events After Aortic Valve Replacement: Insights From the PARTNER Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;15:e012195.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Durand E, Doutriaux M, Bettinger N, Tron C, Fauvel C, Bauer F, Dacher JN, Bouhzam N, Litzler PY, Cribier A, Eltchaninoff H. Incidence, Prognostic Impact, and Predictive Factors of Readmission for Heart Failure After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10:2426-2436.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 46]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 51]  [Article Influence: 7.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
33.  McMurray JJ, Packer M, Desai AS, Gong J, Lefkowitz MP, Rizkala AR, Rouleau JL, Shi VC, Solomon SD, Swedberg K, Zile MR; PARADIGM-HF Investigators and Committees. Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:993-1004.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4078]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4426]  [Article Influence: 442.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
34.  Bohbot Y, Candellier A, Diouf M, Rusinaru D, Altes A, Pasquet A, Maréchaux S, Vanoverschelde JL, Tribouilloy C. Severe Aortic Stenosis and Chronic Kidney Disease: Outcomes and Impact of Aortic Valve Replacement. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9:e017190.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15]  [Article Influence: 3.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
35.  Cardiovascular Research Foundation  Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement to UNload the Left Ventricle in Patients With ADvanced Heart Failure: A Randomized Trial (TAVR UNLOAD). In: ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): U.S. National Library of Medicine. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02661451 ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02661451.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
36.  Karki S, Gajjar R, Bittar-Carlini G, Jha V, Yadav N. Association of Hypoalbuminemia With Clinical Outcomes in Patients Admitted With Acute Heart Failure. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2023;48:101916.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
37.  Sousa IM, Fayh APT, Lima J, Gonzalez MC, Prado CM, Silva FM. Low calf circumference adjusted for body mass index is associated with prolonged hospital stay. Am J Clin Nutr. 2023;117:402-407.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
38.  Bilgen F, Chen P, Poggi A, Wells J, Trumble E, Helmke S, Teruya S, Catalan T, Rosenblum HR, Cornellier ML, Karmally W, Maurer MS, Hummel SL. Insufficient Calorie Intake Worsens Post-Discharge Quality of Life and Increases Readmission Burden in Heart Failure. JACC Heart Fail. 2020;8:756-764.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
39.  Sanchez CE, Hermiller JB Jr, Pinto DS, Chetcuti SJ, Arshi A, Forrest JK, Huang J, Yakubov SJ. Predictors and Risk Calculator of Early Unplanned Hospital Readmission Following Contemporary Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement from the STS/ACC TVT Registry. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020;21:263-270.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12]  [Article Influence: 2.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]