Left bundle branch pacing vs biventricular pacing in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block: A systematic review and meta-analysis

doi:10.4330/wjc.v16.i1.40

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 16, Issue 1

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Supplementary Materials of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (1400)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-8) series, Tables (1-1) series.

Item

Count

PDF

WORD

HTML

800

Figures (1-8)

Tables (1-1)

116

Sum=1063

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

106

Download

161

Sum=267

Jan 26, 2024 (publication date) through May 17, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (2)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Cardiology

ISSN

1949-8462

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Meta-Analysis

World J Cardiol. Jan 26, 2024; 16(1): 40-48
Published online Jan 26, 2024. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v16.i1.40

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 1 PRISMA flowchart.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 2 Forest plot comparing paced QRS duration between left bundle branch pacing and biventricular pacing groups. 95%CI: 95% confidence interval; LBBP: Left bundle branch pacing; BiVP: Biventricular pacing.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 3 Forest plot comparing pacing threshold at follow-up between left bundle branch pacing and biventricular pacing groups. 95%CI: 95% confidence interval; LBBP: Left bundle branch pacing; BiVP: Biventricular pacing.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 4 Forest plot comparing paced left ventricular ejection fraction between left bundle branch pacing and biventricular pacing groups. 95%CI: 95% confidence interval; LBBP: Left bundle branch pacing; BiVP: Biventricular pacing.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 5 Forest plot comparing paced left ventricular end-diastolic diameter between left bundle branch pacing and biventricular pacing groups. 95%CI: 95% confidence interval; LBBP: Left bundle branch pacing; BiVP: Biventricular pacing.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 6 Forest plot comparing paced left ventricular end-systolic diameter between left bundle branch pacing and biventricular pacing groups. 95%CI: 95% confidence interval; LBBP: Left bundle branch pacing; BiVP: Biventricular pacing.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 7 Forest plot comparing New York Heart Association classification between left bundle branch pacing and biventricular pacing groups. 95%CI: 95% confidence interval; LBBP: Left bundle branch pacing; BiVP: Biventricular pacing.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 8 Forest plot comparing B-type natriuretic peptide levels between left bundle branch pacing and biventricular pacing groups. 95%CI: 95% confidence interval; LBBP: Left bundle branch pacing; BiVP: Biventricular pacing.

Citation: Yasmin F, Moeed A, Ochani RK, Raheel H, Awan MAE, Liaquat A, Saleem A, Aamir M, Hawwa N, Surani S. Left bundle branch pacing vs biventricular pacing in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Cardiol 2024; 16(1): 40-48
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v16/i1/40.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v16.i1.40