Published online Jun 26, 2023. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v15.i6.309
Peer-review started: December 9, 2022
First decision: March 15, 2023
Revised: March 30, 2023
Accepted: May 19, 2023
Article in press: May 19, 2023
Published online: June 26, 2023
Processing time: 198 Days and 9.9 Hours
ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a severe form of coronary artery disease with high morbidity and mortality rates. The preferred treatment is primary percutaneous coronary intervention, but the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic led to changes in STEMI management, including the use of fibrinolytic therapy as an alternative treatment.
The COVID-19 pandemic placed a significant strain on healthcare resources and providers, leading to changes in STEMI management. However, the impact of fibrinolytic therapy on clinical outcomes during the pandemic remains largely unknown.
The aim of this systematic review is to examine the significance of the increase in fibrinolytic therapy in adult STEMI patients during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the pre-COVID-19 era and to assess the impact of this treatment strategy on clinical outcomes, particularly the risk of all-cause mortality, in comparison to patients who received standard-care before or during the pandemic.
This study analyzed the incidence of fibrinolytic therapy and all-cause mortality for STEMI patients during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic period. Data synthesis and analysis were performed using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model, subgrouping studies based on changes in fibrinolysis incidence and economic status of countries. The study used sensitivity analysis, meta-regression analysis, and Begg’s funnel plot test to assess publication bias and heterogeneity. Statistical significance was set at < 0.05.
This meta-analysis of 14 studies revealed a significantly higher incidence of fibrinolytic therapy in adult STEMI patients during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic era. Patients in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) were more likely to receive fibrinolytic therapy, and those who received it in LMICs had a higher risk of all-cause mortality. However, overall, there was no significant association between the all-cause mortality rate and the incidence of fibrinolytic therapy. Meta-regression analysis showed that hyperlipidemia and hypertension were significant predictors of all-cause mortality, indicating that managing these conditions may be crucial in reducing mortality risk.
The incidence of fibrinolytic therapy for STEMI patients increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in LMICs. However, there was no significant association between fibrinolysis and all-cause mortality. The findings of this study have important implications for public health initiatives.
Fibrinolytic therapy was more frequently used during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in LMICs, but no significant association was found between the incidence of fibrinolysis and overall all-cause mortality.