Published online Dec 26, 2015. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v7.i12.912
Peer-review started: June 4, 2015
First decision: June 18, 2015
Revised: July 16, 2015
Accepted: September 29, 2015
Article in press: September 30, 2015
Published online: December 26, 2015
Processing time: 206 Days and 23.2 Hours
Antiplatelet therapy with aspirin or clopidogrel or both is the standard care for patients with proven coronary or peripheral arterial disease, especially those undergoing endovascular revascularization procedures. However, despite the administration of the antiplatelet regiments, some patients still experience recurrent cardiovascular ischemic events. So far, it is well documented by several studies that in vitro response of platelets may be extremely variable. Poor antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel or high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) is under investigation by numerous recent studies. This review article focuses on methods used for the ex vivo evaluation of HTPR, as well as on the possible underlying mechanisms and the clinical consequences of this entity. Alternative therapeutic options and future directions are also addressed.
Core tip: Recent data related high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) with adverse clinical outcomes, such as stent thrombosis and repeat procedures, following coronary or peripheral endovascular revascularization procedures. Notably, the incidence of patients suffering from peripheral arterial disease demonstrating inadequate response to clopidogrel is around 50%, which is much higher than the approximately 30% reported for patients suffering from coronary artery disease. Novel more potent antiplatelet P2Y12 agents seem to overcome the phenomenon of HTPR decreasing ischemic events with the cost of increased bleeding risk. Until today no major trial demonstrated clinical improvement for patients undergoing platelet function test-guided individualized antiplatelet therapy. Prescription of new antithrombotic agents aims in avoiding major cardiovascular adverse events, as well as sustaining vessel patency following revascularization. Therefore, improving antiplatelet therapy, considering the risk/benefit ratio, is imperative especially in HTPR patients. Further large-scale studies are awaited to elucidate the role of individualized therapy.