Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Cardiol. Jun 26, 2011; 3(6): 177-185
Published online Jun 26, 2011. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v3.i6.177
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Current status and future perspectives
Pablo Salinas, Raul Moreno, Jose L Lopez-Sendon
Pablo Salinas, Raul Moreno, Jose L Lopez-Sendon, Department of Interventional Cardiology, University Hospital La Paz, 28046, Madrid, Spain
Author contributions: All authors wrote the manuscript.
Correspondence to: Raul Moreno, Director, Department of Interventional Cardiology, University Hospital La Paz, Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain. raulmorenog@terra.es
Telephone: +34-91-2071775 Fax: +34-91-2071775
Received: March 28, 2011
Revised: May 18, 2011
Accepted: May 25, 2011
Published online: June 26, 2011
Abstract

Although surgical aortic valve replacement is the standard therapy for severe aortic stenosis (AS), about one third of patients are considered inoperable due to unacceptable surgical risk. Under medical treatment alone these patients have a very poor prognosis with a mortality rate of 50% at 2 years. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been used in these patients, and has shown robust results in the only randomized clinical trial of severe AS treatment performed so far. In this review, we will focus on the two commercially available systems: Edwards SAPIEN valve and CoreValve Revalving system. Both systems have demonstrated success rates of over 90% with 30-d mortality rates below 10% in the most recent transfemoral TAVI studies. Moreover, long-term studies have shown that the valves have good haemodynamic performance. Some studies are currently exploring the non-inferiority of TAVI procedures vs conventional surgery in high-risk patients, and long-term clinical results of the percutaneous valves. In this article we review the current status of TAVI including selection of patients, a comparison of available prostheses, results and complications of the procedure, clinical outcomes, and future perspectives.

Keywords: Aortic valve stenosis; Heart valve prosthesis; Transcatheter aortic valve implantation; Non-coronary intervention; Aortic valve replacement