Published online May 26, 2018. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v10.i5.35
Peer-review started: February 5, 2018
First decision: March 7, 2018
Revised: March 8, 2018
Accepted: April 22, 2018
Article in press: April 22, 2018
Published online: May 26, 2018
Processing time: 109 Days and 12.7 Hours
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) represents the reference standard for cardiac morphology and function assessment. Since introduction in 2009, CMR feature tracking (CMR-FT) has become a frequently used tool in the assessment of myocardial deformation and wall motion on the basis of routinely acquired b-SSFP cine images. Extensive validation has led to excellent intra- and inter-observer as well as inter-study reproducibility. CMR-FT derived myocardial deformation indices such as left ventricular (LV) strain have been shown to be impaired in cardiac diseases such as cardiomyopathies as well as myocardial infarction. Although LV ejection fraction (LVEF) is the routinely and frequently utilized parameter for systolic myocardial function assessment and major adverse clinical event (MACE) prediction, it fails to assess regional differences. Recently, LV strain has emerged as a superior measure for risk assessment and MACE prediction as compared to the established markers e.g., LVEF. This editorial aims to elucidate current discussions in the field of strain assessment in myocardial infarction in the light of recent data from a large prospective multicentre CMR study.
Core tip: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature-tracking bears the potential for superior risk evaluation in infarct patients beyond established risk factors such as left ventricular ejection fraction. However, further clinical trials are inevitably needed to establish vendor independent thresholds for clinical routine use in various cardiac diseases.