Published online Nov 26, 2018. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v10.i11.242
Peer-review started: August 9, 2018
First decision: August 24, 2018
Revised: September 8, 2018
Accepted: October 12, 2018
Article in press: October 12, 2018
Published online: November 26, 2018
Processing time: 109 Days and 0.5 Hours
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of surgical left atrial appendage occlusion (s-LAAO) during concomitant cardiac surgery.
We performed a comprehensive literature search through May 31st 2018 for all eligible studies comparing s-LAAO vs no occlusion in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Clinical outcomes during follow-up included: embolic events, stroke, all-cause mortality, atrial fibrillation (AF), reoperation for bleeding and postoperative complications. We further stratified the analysis based on propensity matched studies and AF predominance.
Twelve studies (n = 40107) met the inclusion criteria. s-LAAO was associated with lower risk of embolic events (OR: 0.63, 95%CI: 0.53-0.76; P < 0.001) and stroke (OR: 0.68, 95%CI: 0.57-0.82; P < 0.0001). Stratified analysis demonstrated this association was more prominent in the AF predominant strata. There was no significant difference in the incidence risk of all-cause mortality, AF, and reoperation for bleeding and postoperative complications.
Concomitant s-LAAO during cardiac surgery was associated with lower risk of follow-up thromboembolic events and stroke, especially in those with AF without significant increase in adverse events. Further randomized trials to evaluate long-term benefits of s-LAAO are warranted.
Core tip: Surgical left atrial appendage occlusion (s-LAAO) is performed during cardiac surgeries in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, evidence to perform routinely during cardiac surgeries is conflicting and contrasting. It is currently given a class IIb recommendation in the professional medical society guidelines. We sought to perform a meta-analysis of all the studies published to date to evaluate the safety and efficacy of s-LAAO.