Published online Nov 26, 2018. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v10.i11.196
Peer-review started: July 12, 2018
First decision: August 2, 2018
Revised: August 14, 2018
Accepted: October 11, 2018
Article in press: October 12, 2018
Published online: November 26, 2018
Processing time: 137 Days and 8.2 Hours
Patients with below-the-knee arterial disease are primarily individuals suffering from critical limb ischemia (CLI), while a large percentage of these patients are also suffering from diabetes or chronic renal failure or both. Available data from randomized controlled trials and their meta-analysis demonstrated that the use of infrapopliteal drug-eluting stents (DES), in short- to medium- length lesions, obtains significantly better results compared to plain balloon angioplasty and bare metal stenting with regards to vascular restenosis, target lesion revascularization, wound healing and amputations. Nonetheless, the use of this technology in every-day clinical practice remains limited mainly due to concerns regarding the deployment of a permanent metallic scaffold and the possibility of valid future therapeutic perspectives. However, in the majority of the cases, these concerns are not scientifically justified. Large-scale, multicenter randomized controlled trials, investigating a significantly larger number of patients than those already published, would provide more solid evidence and consolidate the use of infrapopliteal DES in CLI patients. Moreover, there is still little evidence on whether this technology can be as effective for longer below-the-knee lesions, where a considerable number of DES is required. The development and investigation of new, longer balloon-expanding or perhaps self-expanding DES could be the answer to this problem.
Core tip: The use of infrapopliteal drug-eluting stents (DES) remains limited in clinical practice mainly due to concerns regarding the deployment of a permanent metallic scaffold and the possibility of valid future therapeutic perspectives. However, these concerns are not scientifically justified. Large-scale, multicenter randomized controlled trials investigating a significantly larger number of patients would consolidate the use of infrapopliteal DES in critical limb ischemia patients. Moreover, there is still little evidence on whether this technology can be as effective for longer lesions, where a considerable number of DES is required. The development and investigation of longer balloon-expanding or self-expanding DES could solve this problem.