Complete revascularization has been shown to be superior to culprit-only treatment in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel disease. However, it remains unclear whether complete revascularization should be guided by coronary physiology or conventional angiography. Angiography-derived physiology may allow functional assessment and procedural guidance using angiograms from primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), potentially maximizing the benefits of a physiology-guided approach. We present the design of a dedicated study that will address this research gap.

The Functional Coronary Angiography to Indicate and Guide Revascularization in STEMI Patients with Multivessel Disease (AIR-STEMI) trial is a prospective, randomized, international, multicenter, open-label study with blinded adjudicated evaluation of outcomes. After successful treatment of the culprit lesion, patients will be randomized to receive PCI of the nonculprit lesions guided by conventional angiography or by angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR). The primary endpoint is the composite endpoint of all-cause death, any myocardial infarction (MI), any cerebrovascular accident, or any revascularization. It will be censored once the last enrolled patient reaches 1-year follow-up. The secondary endpoint will be the composite of cardiovascular death or MI and each single component of the primary endpoint. All endpoints will be tested also at 3 and 5 years. The sample size for the study is a minimum of 1,800 patients.

The AIR-STEMI trial will provide novel evidence on whether a specific complete revascularization strategy should be applied to patients with STEMI and multivessel disease to improve their clinical outcomes.

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05818475.

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is an established alternative to coronary artery bypass grafting for the treatment of select patients with unprotected left main (LM) coronary artery disease (CAD). This study evaluates the safety and clinical impact of treating additional coronary arteries during LM-PCI. Consecutive patients undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stents for unprotected LM-CAD between 2010 and 2021 at The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, USA were eligible for inclusion. Patients were stratified based on whether they underwent treatment of the LM complex alone or had concomitant PCI to an additional vessel outside the LM complex. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, at 1 year following PCI. Among 869 consecutive patients (mean age 70.9, 33.0% female, 27.9 mean SYNTAX score) undergoing LM-PCI, 479 (55.1%) underwent treatment of the LM complex alone, and 390 (44.9%) had concomitant PCI of an additional non-LM vessel. Compared with LM complex PCI only, there were no significant differences in the rate of MACE at 1 year [HR 12.0% vs 13.3%; HR: 0.95; 95% CI (0.62-1.44), p = 0.797], even after adjustment for potential confounders [HR 12.0% vs 13.3%; HR: 0.87; 95% CI (0.56-1.36), p = 0.550]. In conclusion, in a large, real-world cohort of patients undergoing unprotected LM-PCI, treatment of an additional non-LM vessel did not increase the risk of MACE at 1 year compared to LM complex PCI alone.

Patients with acute myocardial infarction and angiographically obstructive non-culprit lesions are at high risk for recurrent major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). However, it remains largely unknown whether events are due to stenosis severity or due to the underlying high-risk lesion morphology.

Between January 2017 and December 2021, 1312 patients with acute myocardial infarction underwent optical coherence tomography of all the 3 main epicardial arteries after successful percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients and lesions were categorized according to the presence or absence of (1) 1 or more non-culprit angiographic obstructive stenoses with a visual diameter stenosis of ≥50% and (2) 1 or more lesions with an underlying high-risk morphology defined as an optical coherence tomography thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA). Patients were followed for up to 5 years (median 4.1 [interquartile range: 3.0-5.0] years). MACEs comprised cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and unplanned coronary revascularization.

Overall, 492 patients had at least 1 obstructive non-culprit lesion, 352 had a single lesion, and 140 had multiple obstructive non-culprit lesions. The presence and number of angiographic obstructive non-culprit lesions correlated with the proportion and number of optical coherence tomography-derived TCFAs. At the lesion level, the prevalence of TCFA was twice as high in obstructive lesions compared with nonobstructive lesions. Patients with obstructive non-culprit lesions had an increased risk of overall MACEs (17.7% versus 12.8%; hazard ratio, 1.39 [95% CI, 1.02-1.91]) and non-culprit lesion-related MACEs (8.7% versus 3.9%; HR, 2.13 [95% CI, 1.26-3.59). Results were similar when patients were categorized on the basis of the underlying TCFA. A proportionally higher rate of overall and non-culprit lesion-related MACEs was observed as the number of obstructive stenoses or TCFAs in non-culprit segments increased. The lesion-specific HRs for obstructive lesion and TCFA were 2.03 (95% CI, 1.06-3.89) and 2.39 (95% CI, 1.29-4.43), respectively. Optical coherence tomography-derived TCFA, but not angiographic obstructive stenosis, was independently predictive of recurrent MACEs in both patient-level and lesion-level multivariable models in which these 2 characteristics were introduced simultaneously.

The long-term prognostic implications of the presence and extent of angiographic obstructive non-culprit lesions in patients with acute myocardial infarction are primarily due to their correlation with the underlying high-risk morphology, which confers an increased risk of recurrent MACEs.

Multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) is present in 30-70% of patients presenting with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) depending on varying age and risk profiles. In contrast to the STEMI cohort, there is only limited scientific evidence derived from randomized controlled trials directing the general decision for or against complete revascularization in the NSTEMI population.

The COMPLETE-NSTEMI trial aims to investigate whether multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is superior over culprit-lesion only PCI in patients with NSTEMI and multivessel CAD.

COMPLETE-NSTEMI is a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter, parallel group, open-label trial. It will enroll 3390 NSTEMI patients with multivessel CAD at 65 to 70 sites in Germany and Austria. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to either complete revascularization with PCI or culprit lesion-only PCI.

The primary efficacy endpoint is a composite of cardiovascular death or rehospitalization for non-fatal myocardial infarction during follow-up. The trial is event-driven and will be stopped as soon as 578 primary endpoint events and a minimal follow-up duration of 12 months for each patient are reached.

The first patient was enrolled at October 27, 2023. By April 2025, 51 sites have been activated and >500 patients have been randomized. Completion of recruitment is expected for the first half of 2027. The final results of the primary endpoint are expected in 2028.

COMPLETE NSTEMI will be the first dedicated trial to answer the question about the optimal revascularization strategy in patients with NSTEMI and multivessel CAD.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT05786131.

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major cause of ill health and death worldwide. Coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) is the first-line investigation to detect CAD in symptomatic patients. This diagnostic approach risks greater second-line heart tests and treatments at a cost to the patient and health system. The National Health Service funded use of an artificial intelligence (AI) diagnostic tool, computed tomography (CT)-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR-CT), in patients with chest pain to improve physician decision-making and reduce downstream tests. This observational cohort study assessed the impact of FFR-CT on cardiovascular outcomes by including all patients investigated with CCTA during the national AI implementation program at 27 hospitals (CCTA n = 90,553 and FFR-CT n = 7,863). FFR-CT was safe, with no difference in all-cause (n = 1,134 (3.2%) versus 1,612 (2.9%), adjusted-hazard ratio (aHR) 1.00 (0.93-1.08), P = 0.97) or cardiovascular mortality (n = 465 (1.3%) versus 617 (1.1%), aHR 0.96 (0.85-1.08), P = 0.48), while reducing invasive coronary angiograms (n = 5,720 (16%) versus 8,183 (14.9%), aHR 0.93 (0.90-0.97), P < 0.001) and noninvasive cardiac tests (189/1,000 patients versus 167/1,000), P < 0.001). Implementation of an AI-diagnostic tool as part of a health intervention program was safe and beneficial to the patient pathway and health system with fewer cardiac tests at 2 years.

Patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) present with critical hemodynamic compromise with low cardiac output (CO) resulting in end-organ dysfunction. Prognosis is closely related to the severity of shock, and treatment of patients with CS is resource intensive. In this review, we consider the current treatment paradigms alongside the evidence that underpins them. The current standard of treatment relies on a feedback mechanism, where small changes in treatment are assessed to see if clinical improvement occurs. This leads to delays that increase time in the shock state. The novel approach described proposes immediate treatment to ameliorate the shock state to "break" the shock spiral as quickly and decisively as possible, suggesting new metrics to measure performance.

The "2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI Guideline for the Management of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes" incorporates new evidence since the "2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction" and the corresponding "2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes" and the "2015 ACC/AHA/SCAI Focused Update on Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction." The "2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI Guideline for the Management of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes" and the "2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization" retire and replace, respectively, the "2016 ACC/AHA Guideline Focused Update on Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease."

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from July 2023 to April 2024. Clinical studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and other evidence conducted on human participants were identified that were published in English from MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline.

Many recommendations from previously published guidelines have been updated with new evidence, and new recommendations have been created when supported by published data.

The aberrant activation of the nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptor family pyrin domain-containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome has been implicated in the exacerbation of myocardial damage and the subsequent development of heart failure following myocardial infarction (MI). Inhibiting NLRP3 inflammasome activation offers a promising therapeutic strategy for mitigating MI-related injury, although no NLRP3 inhibitors have received Food and Drug administration (FDA) approval to date. To identify novel NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitors through the repurposing of FDA-approved drugs, Tamibarotene emerged as a potent inhibitor with a favorable safety profile. Mechanistically, Tamibarotene inhibits NLRP3 inflammasome activation independently of retinoic acid receptor activation, binding to Phe410 and Ile417 within the nucleotide-binding and oligomerization (NACHT) domain in an ATPase activity-dependent manner. This interaction further inhibits the assembly of the NLRP3 inflammasome. In a murine model of MI, Tamibarotene significantly reduced myocardial damage and improved cardiac function by inhibiting NLRP3 inflammasome activation. In summary, NLRP3 has been identified as a direct target of Tamibarotene for myocardial repair following MI, indicating that Tamibarotene could serve as a potential precursor for the development of innovative NLRP3 inhibitors.

Acute MI (AMI) is a leading cause of mortality globally. Swift diagnosis is imperative, with timely reperfusion crucial to minimise adverse outcomes. Revascularisation strategies include culprit-vessel-only therapy, staged complete revascularisation or immediate complete revascularisation. Evidence from randomised trials strongly favours complete revascularisation in ST-elevation MI (STEMI). Data regarding immediate complete revascularisation compared to a staged approach are limited, with uncertainties regarding the advantages of physiology-guided treatment compared to angiographic assessment alone. Non-STEMI (NSTEMI) patients with multivessel disease are often complex and current guidelines offer limited recommendations for this patient group, emphasising the need for individualised treatment. Observational studies have sought to find the optimal approach, yet conflicting data prevails. Dedicated trials for this issue in NSTEMI patients are currently unavailable. To enhance the decision-making processes for patients with AMI, future trials should consider the inclusion of functional health status and health-related quality of life outcomes. The existing gaps in knowledge underscore the intricacies of managing AMI and the ongoing necessity for comprehensive research to refine treatment strategies.

Coronary calcification is a well-known marker of atherosclerotic plaque burden and a determinant of stent under expansion with unfavorable long-term outcomes.

This sub study of the randomized BIOVASC trial aimed to compare immediate complete revascularization (ICR) and staged complete revascularization (SCR) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and multi vessel disease (MVD), stratified by calcification of the culprit lesion.

The primary endpoint consisted of a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, unplanned ischemia driven revascularization (UIDR) and cerebrovascular events at 2 year follow-up. Secondary endpoints included the individual components of the primary composite and major bleedings. We used cox regression models to relate study endpoints with randomized treatment stratified by calcification of the culprit lesion.

The BIOVASC trial enrolled 103 patients with a moderately or severely calcified culprit lesion. The composite primary outcome occurred in 8/57 (14.3%) versus 9/46 (19.7%) patients randomized to ICR and SCR (hazard ratio [HR] 0.66% and 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25-1.71, p = 0.39). In the non-calcified culprit lesions, there were 83 events in the ICR (12.4%) and 82 events in the SCR (11.9%) (HR 1.01 [0.75-1.37], p = 0.94, P-interaction = 0.42). There was no evidence of a differential effect of ICR vs. SCR on the primary endpoint in relation to culprit lesion calcification (P-interaction = 0.42).

No differential treatment effect of ICR versus SCR was observed when comparing the primary composite outcome between calcified and non-calcified culprit lesion.

Periprocedural myocardial injury (PMI) with or without type 4a myocardial infarction (MI) might occur in patients with non-ST-segment-elevation MI (NSTEMI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study investigated the incidence and prognostic relevance of these events, according to current definitions, in patients with NSTEMI undergoing PCI. The best cardiac troponin I (cTnI) threshold of PMI for prognostic stratification is also suggested.

Consecutive patients with NSTEMI from January 2017 to April 2022 undergoing PCI with stable or falling pre-PCI cTnI levels were enrolled. According to the Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction, the study population was stratified into those experiencing (1) PMI with type 4a MI, (2) PMI without type 4a MI, or (3) no PMI. Post-PCI cTnI increase >20% with an absolute postprocedural value of ≥5 times the 99th percentile upper reference limit within 48 hours after PCI was used to define PMI. The primary end point was 1-year all-cause mortality, and the secondary end point consisted of major adverse cardiovascular events at 1 year, including all-cause mortality, nonfatal reinfarction, urgent revascularization, nonfatal ischemic stroke, and hospitalization for heart failure. Internal validation was performed in patients enrolled between May 2022 and April 2023.

Among 1412 patients with NSTEMI undergoing PCI with stable or falling cTnI levels at baseline, 240 (17%) experienced PMI with type 4a MI, 288 (20.4%) experienced PMI without type 4a MI, and 884 (62.6%) experienced no PMI. PMI was associated with an increased risk of adverse clinical outcomes, with patients with type 4a MI demonstrating the highest rates of 1-year all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events. A post-PCI ΔcTnI >20% but ≤40% showed similar outcomes to patients without PMI, whereas >40% was identified as the optimal threshold for prognostically relevant PMI, confirmed in an internal validation cohort of 305 patients.

Periprocedural ischemic events were frequent in patients with NSTEMI undergoing PCI with prognostic implications. A post-PCI ΔcTnI >40%, combined with an absolute postprocedural value of ≥5 times the 99th percentile upper reference limit, was identified as the optimal threshold for diagnosing prognostically relevant PMI. Recognizing these events may improve risk stratification and management of patients with NSTEMI.

Among patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel disease, whether fractional flow reserve (FFR) guided complete revascularization (CR) is superior to the now widely used culprit-only (COR) revascularization is unclear.

We conducted a search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and CNKI for randomized controlled trials comparing FFR-guided CR with COR in STEMI patients with multivessel disease. Data extraction and analysis adhered to Cochrane guidelines, with major adverse cardiac events as the primary outcome.

This meta-analysis included 6 trials involving 3,482 patients. FFR-guided CR was associated with a reduction in major adverse cardiac events (RR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.46-0.94, 95% PI: 0.20-2.19), ischemia-driven revascularization (RR: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.19-0.40, 95% PI: 0.16-0.46), and repeat percutaneous coronary interventions (RR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.22-0.50, 95% PI: 0.16-0.78) compared to COR. However, no difference was observed in all-cause mortality (RR: 1.12, 95% CI: 0.86-1.46, 95% PI: 0.79-1.58) or safety outcomes.

FFR-guided CR reduces major adverse cardiac events compared to COR, though benefits may vary across settings. It significantly lowers ischemia-driven revascularization and repeat percutaneous coronary interventions, with no difference in all-cause mortality compared to COR.

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024567524, PROSPERO (CRD42024567524).

The 2021 Percutaneous Coronary Intervention guidelines completed by American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions provide a set of guidelines regarding revascularization strategies. With emphasis on equity of care, multidisciplinary heart team use, revascularization for acute coronary syndrome, and stable ischemic heart disease, the guidelines create a thorough framework with recommendations regarding therapeutic strategies. In this comprehensive review, our aim is to summarize the 2021 revascularization guidelines and analyze key points regarding each recommendation.

The "2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI Guideline for the Management of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes" incorporates new evidence since the "2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction" and the corresponding "2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes" and the "2015 ACC/AHA/SCAI Focused Update on Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction." The "2025 ACC/AHA/ACEP/NAEMSP/SCAI Guideline for the Management of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes" and the "2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization" retire and replace, respectively, the "2016 ACC/AHA Guideline Focused Update on Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease."

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from July 2023 to April 2024. Clinical studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and other evidence conducted on human participants were identified that were published in English from MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline.

Many recommendations from previously published guidelines have been updated with new evidence, and new recommendations have been created when supported by published data.

In the elderly, acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are particularly challenging, especially with multivessel disease (MVD). Concerns about outcomes and limited evidence often lead to conservative treatment. While complete revascularization benefits in younger patients are well established, uncertainties persist for older individuals.

A national multicenter, retrospective cohort study of 629 patients older than 75 with ACS and MVD was divided into two groups: complete revascularization (CR) and culprit-only (CO) revascularization. The in-hospital composite outcome of death and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and the follow-up composite outcome of death and cardiovascular hospital admission were assessed.

Of 629 patients, 383 (66 %) were successfully revascularized: 254 (66 %) with CO revascularization and 129 (34 %) with CR. The mean age between groups was similar; in the CO group, it was 82 ± 5 years, while in the CR group, it was 81 ± 5 years (p = 0.4). The proportion of females was similar (42 % vs. 39 %). There was a higher ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction rate in the CO group (62 % vs 38 %, p < 0.01). CR was associated with a lower rate of in-hospital events (35 % vs 51 %, p = 0.025; OR 0.62 95 %CI [0.4-0.9]). Not only was there an association between CR and a lower number of in-hospital deaths (6 % vs. 19 %, p < 0.01; OR 0.3 95 %CI [0.15-0.67]) but also with lower in-hospital MACE (34 % vs. 49 % p = 0.02; OR 0.6 95 %CI [0.4-0.9]). During follow-up, complete revascularization was non-significantly associated with lower mortality (14 % vs. 15 %, p = 0.4), hospital admissions (22 % vs. 25 %, p = 0.2), and the composite outcome (35 % vs. 40 %, p = 0.2) compared with the culprit-only cohort. The survival curves of both groups were statistically similar (p = 0.16).

In older patients with ACS and MVD, the ideal revascularization strategy is still to be determined. However, CR was associated with lower in-hospital deaths and MACE without significant difference in follow-up events, deaths, and hospital admissions. The choice of revascularization strategy should be carefully individualized and tailored considering patient-specific factors, clinical presentation, and overall risk profile.

Coronary artery disease is a highly prevalent disease that constitutes the leading cause of mortality worldwide. Acute coronary syndromes are the most devastating form of presentation of coronary disease, involving the acute formation of a thrombus within the coronary vessel lumen, further leading to flow limitation and diminished myocardial perfusion. Vulnerable plaques, which are characterized by thin-cap fibroatheroma, a large lipid pool, and macrophage infiltration and spotty calcification of the cap, pose a higher risk of coronary events despite not being flow-limiting. Iterations in intravascular imaging and coronary computed tomography have largely increased the ability to detect and define vulnerable plaques, and its clinical impact in early- and mid-term outcomes has been confirmed in several studies. In this review, we aimed to revise the current concept of vulnerable coronary plaque and its repercussion, to summarize the main pharmacological approaches for its management, and to provide an updated overview of the available evidence on preventive percutaneous interventional strategies in this clinical setting.

The American Heart Association (AHA), in conjunction with the National Institutes of Health, annually reports the most up-to-date statistics related to heart disease, stroke, and cardiovascular risk factors, including core health behaviors (smoking, physical activity, nutrition, sleep, and obesity) and health factors (cholesterol, blood pressure, glucose control, and metabolic syndrome) that contribute to cardiovascular health. The AHA Heart Disease and Stroke Statistical Update presents the latest data on a range of major clinical heart and circulatory disease conditions (including stroke, brain health, complications of pregnancy, kidney disease, congenital heart disease, rhythm disorders, sudden cardiac arrest, subclinical atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease, cardiomyopathy, heart failure, valvular disease, venous thromboembolism, and peripheral artery disease) and the associated outcomes (including quality of care, procedures, and economic costs).

The AHA, through its Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee, continuously monitors and evaluates sources of data on heart disease and stroke in the United States and globally to provide the most current information available in the annual Statistical Update with review of published literature through the year before writing. The 2025 AHA Statistical Update is the product of a full year's worth of effort in 2024 by dedicated volunteer clinicians and scientists, committed government professionals, and AHA staff members. This year's edition includes a continued focus on health equity across several key domains and enhanced global data that reflect improved methods and incorporation of ≈3000 new data sources since last year's Statistical Update.

Each of the chapters in the Statistical Update focuses on a different topic related to heart disease and stroke statistics.

The Statistical Update represents a critical resource for the lay public, policymakers, media professionals, clinicians, health care administrators, researchers, health advocates, and others seeking the best available data on these factors and conditions.

Since its inception, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has relied upon vessel opacification with iodinated contrast to plan, guide, and assess the results of the procedure. Yet revisiting this fundamental concept is important in contemporary PCI practice, especially in patients with high-risk clinical or anatomical profiles. In addition to decreasing the probability of acute kidney injury during PCI, limiting the volume of iodinated contrast allows the operator to perform more thorough interventions by relying on intracoronary imaging and physiology, ultimately contributing to more complete revascularization and improving the efficacy and durability of the intervention. Ultra-low-contrast PCI (ULCPCI) may thus be useful in performing PCI not only in patients with chronic renal dysfunction but also in those with multivessel coronary artery disease, impaired left ventricular function, and many other scenarios. The aim of this review is to highlight contemporary PCI scenarios in which a ULCPCI approach may be beneficial. The authors provide a structured approach to address the challenges faced by operators in transitioning from conventional contrast-based interventions to ULCPCI, with practical solutions that are accessible to most interventionalists. The reader will learn that ULCPCI is feasible in contemporary practice as a result of technological innovation, the implementation of dedicated skills, and redefining the role of angiography as the cornerstone of contemporary PCI.

Hemodynamically obstructive coronary plaques may contain more vulnerable plaque characteristics than nonobstructive lesions.

The authors aimed to assess whether pressure-wire-based physiologic indices in nonculprit lesions are associated with vulnerable plaque characteristics.

In the PROSPECT II study, patients with recent myocardial infarction underwent coronary angiography and culprit lesion percutaneous coronary intervention plus combined near-infrared spectroscopy and intravascular ultrasound assessment of all 3 coronary arteries. Instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) or fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements were performed in intermediate lesions with angiographic stenosis >40%.

Among 898 patients, 319 angiographically intermediate lesions in 275 patients had matched intravascular ultrasound/near-infrared spectroscopy and FFR/iFR measurements; 96 (30.1%) lesions were physiologically significant (FFR ≤0.80 or iFR ≤0.89) and 223 (69.9%) were not. Physiologically significant lesions, compared with those that were not, more likely had a minimal lumen area ≤4.0 mm2 (96.9% vs 83.9%), plaque burden ≥70% (92.7% vs 71.3%) and maximum lipid core burden index in any 4 mm segment of the lesion ≥324.7 (57.0% vs 45.4%). By multivariable analysis, lesion location in the left anterior descending artery, small minimal lumen area, and larger plaque burden were independently associated with physiologic significance, whereas maximum lipid core burden index in any 4 mm segment of the lesion was not.

In patients with recent myocardial infarction, angiographically intermediate but physiologically significant coronary lesions were more likely to have high-risk vulnerable plaque features compared with nonphysiologically significant stenoses. However, coronary lesions without physiological significance also had a moderate-to-high prevalence of high-risk plaque characteristics, which may explain the residual risk associated with conservative noninterventional management of these lesions. (Providing Regional Observations to Study Predictors of Events in the Coronary Tree II [PROSPECT II]; NCT02171065).

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is one of the most common cardiovascular diseases and the most common cause of death in Russia. Primary diagnostics of CHD involves assessing the pre-test probability of CHD. Thereafter, myocardial ischemia should be verified by visualization technique: stress echocardiography or stress single-photon emission computed tomography of the myocardium. Myocardial revascularization improves the prognosis in patients with stable CHD who have three-vessel coronary disease or significant stenosis of the left main coronary artery. Outpatient monitoring and free provision of medications can significantly reduce mortality among patients with stable high-risk CHD.

Rural vs metropolitan ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients experience delayed access to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Existing New South Wales (NSW) Statewide Cardiac Reperfusion Strategy protocols provide thrombolysis and ambulance diversion for patients within 90 minutes of a PCI centre in regional and rural NSW. Rural patients presenting to non-PCI hospitals and those more than 90 minutes from PCI are not routinely, urgently, diverted under existing protocols.

Western NSW Local Health District, covering 250,000 km2 and a population of 278,759, implemented a centralised management system (CMS) in 2019, in partnership with NSW Ambulance, utilising existing STEMI thrombolysis protocols and extending "drip and ship" protocols for "hot transfer" of all patients to the 24/7 PCI centre, by direct ambulance diversion up to 120 minutes by road, or via multi-stage transfer by road or air, or via interhospital transfer. Data for 2 years post-CMS was compared to historical controls. Time from first clinical contact (FCC) to reperfusion, FCC to PCI centre, major adverse clinical events and percentage of patients undergoing angiography within 24 hours were compared in "medium" (90-120 minutes) and "long" (>120 minutes) transfer zones, not covered by existing protocols.

Outcomes were recorded for 274 patients before and 348 after CMS implementation (17% medium and 31% long transfer zones). Medium and long transfer zones had greater proportions of smokers and Indigenous patients than short transfer zones. There was significantly lower ambulance utilisation in the long (38%) compared with the short transfer zone (55%, p<0.001). In the long transfer zone, there were significant improvements in FCC to reperfusion (40 vs 48 minutes, p<0.05), FCC to PCI centre (296 vs 344 minutes, p<0.01), and angiography in 24 hours (77% vs 58%, p<0.01), with no significant differences in major adverse clinical events.

A rural STEMI CMS, with "hot transfer", can deliver patients from a vast geographical area directly to a rural PCI centre. Patients furthest away, with the greatest risk profile, benefit the most. Extension of this program and development of 24/7 PCI in NSW rural cardiac hubs stands to improve timely, definitive treatment, including access to angiography within 24 hours.

Trials assessing the prognostic influence of the completeness, timing, and guidance of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for haemodynamically stable acute myocardial infarction (MI) and multivessel coronary artery disease (MV-CAD) have provided heterogeneous results.

We aimed to comprehensively and simultaneously assess the available evidence on the completeness, timing, and guidance of PCI for acute MI and MV-CAD.

Major electronic databases were screened to identify randomised trials comparing at least two PCI strategies for acute MI and MV-CAD. Recurrent MI and cardiac death were the primary and co-primary outcomes. Frequentist and Bayesian 5- and 3-node network meta-analyses were conducted along with complementary analyses to explore potential sources of heterogeneity.

Fourteen trials, including 14,433 patients, were pooled. In the frequentist 5-node analysis, angiography-guided immediate complete revascularisation (CR) reduced MI compared with infarct-related artery (IRA)-only revascularisation (hazard ratio [HR] 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.27-0.66), angiography-guided staged CR (HR 0.56, 95% CI: 0.36-0.87), and functionally guided staged CR (HR 0.37, 95% CI: 0.20-0.69). Functionally guided immediate CR was associated with reduced MI compared with IRA-only revascularisation (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.34-0.82). The Bayesian analysis confirmed only an advantage of angiography-guided immediate CR over IRA-only revascularisation. In frequentist 3-node analysis, immediate CR reduced MI (HR 0.51, 95% CI: 0.37-0.70) and cardiac death (HR 0.68, 95% CI: 0.50-0.93) compared with IRA-only revascularisation and MI compared with staged CR (HR 0.55, 95% CI: 0.38-0.79). The Bayesian analysis did not confirm the reduction in cardiac death. CR, regardless of the type of guidance and especially when immediate, reduced the rate of any revascularisation compared with IRA-only revascularisation.

In haemodynamically stable patients with acute MI and non-complex MV-CAD undergoing PCI, immediate CR following successful culprit lesion treatment reduces recurrent MI compared with IRA-only revascularisation and staged CR. Whether CR is associated with reduced cardiovascular death remains uncertain.

In the COMPLETE (Complete vs Culprit-Only Revascularization to Treat Multi-Vessel Disease After Early PCI for STEMI) trial, complete revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel disease (MVD) reduced important outcomes compared with culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention. Whether clinical outcomes in STEMI patients with MVD are influenced by the presence of a left anterior descending (LAD) nonculprit lesion (NCL) remains unknown.

This study sought to compare: 1) cardiovascular outcomes among patients with an NCL in the proximal/mid-LAD to patients with an NCL in other locations; and 2) the benefit of NCL revascularization in patients with and without a proximal/mid-LAD NCL.

The COMPLETE trial enrolled patients presenting with STEMI and MVD to angiography-guided complete revascularization vs a culprit lesion-only strategy. All coronary angiograms were evaluated in a central core laboratory. In this prespecified subanalysis, treatment effect according to proximal/mid-NCL location was determined for the coprimary outcomes of: 1) cardiovascular death or new myocardial infarction; and 2) cardiovascular death, new myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization. Cox proportional hazards models were performed with an interaction term for treatment allocation and NCL location.

Of the 4,041 subjects in COMPLETE, 1,666 patients had a proximal/mid-LAD NCL (41.2%). The first coprimary outcome occurred in 8.5% (2.9%/y) of patients with a proximal/mid-LAD NCL vs 9.9% (3.4%/y) in those without (adjusted HR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.67-1.03). Complete revascularization had a similar benefit in reducing the first coprimary outcome for patients with a proximal/mid-LAD NCL (7.7% vs 9.2%; HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.61-1.18) and those without (8.0% vs 11.9%; HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.50-0.86), with no differential treatment effect (interaction P = 0.235) CONCLUSIONS: Among patients presenting with STEMI and multivessel CAD, those with a proximal/mid-LAD NCL had similar event rates to those without. The benefit of complete revascularization between the groups was similar, with no evidence of heterogeneity.

In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease, the optimal management strategy for non-culprit lesions is a subject of ongoing debate. There has been an increasing use of physiology-guidance to assess the extent of occlusion in non-culprit lesions, and hence the need for stenting. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is commonly used as a technique. This analysis compares FFR versus conservative management in the management of non-culprit lesions in STEMI patients with multivessel disease.

A comprehensive literature search was conducted on databases from inception to May 25, 2024. We conducted a random-effects meta-analysis using RevMan version 5.3.0, employing the Der-Simonian and Laird method to combine the data.

The analysis of five RCTs including 3759 patients revealed a significantly lower incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (composite of all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction and the need for repeat revascularization [PCI or CABG]) in the FFR group compared to the conservative management group (RR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.44-0.96, p = 0.03). The revascularization rates were significantly lower in the FFR group (RR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.43-0.66, p < 0.00001). Additionally, unplanned hospitalization leading to urgent repeat revascularization and any cause hospitalization were significantly lower in the FFR group (RR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.56-0.94, p = 0.01), and (RR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.46-0.84, p = 0.002), respectively. The FFR group had a higher risk of definite stent thrombosis (RR = 2.26, 95% CI: 1.10-4.64, p = 0.03). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in mortality, hospitalization for heart failure, or myocardial infarction. Similarly, bleeding rates, cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs), and contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) were comparable between both groups.

Our findings support FFR-guided PCI to manage non-culprit lesions in STEMI patients with multivessel disease as it is potentially safe, with comparable rates of bleeding, CVAs and CIN. It also improves clinical outcomes, as well as reduces revascularization and hospitalization rates. The risk of stent thrombosis remains a concern, and hence the decision making for FFR-guided complete revascularization should take into account the complexity/risk of the procedure, as well as the patients' individual co-morbidities and preferences.

Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) analysis is a simple and non-invasive coronary physiological assessment method with evidence for evaluating stable coronary artery disease with correlation to fractional flow reserve (FFR). However, there is no evidence to recommend its use in non-culprit lesions (NCLs) in myocardial infarction (MI).

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis using the PRISMA and PROSPERO statements. The study's primary objective was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of QFR in identifying functionally significant NCLs after MI based on invasive FFR and non-hyperemic pressure ratios as references. We obtained values of the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). We performed a leave-one-out sensitivity analysis for each study's impact on the overall effect.

We included eight studies, with 713 patients and 920 vessels evaluated with QFR. The overall AUC was 0.941 (I2 = 0.559, p < 0.002), with a sensitivity of 87.3%, a specificity of 89.4%, a PPV of 86.6%, and an NPV of 90.1%. Compared to FFR, we found an AUC of 0.957 (I2 = 0.331, p < 0.194), a sensitivity of 89.6%, a specificity of 89.8%, a PPV of 88.3%, and an NPV of 91%. The sensitivity analysis showed a similar diagnostic performance in both studies.

QFR is effective in analyzing NCLs with a significant diagnostic yield compared to FFR, with an excellent AUC in MI patients. Performing prospective multicenter studies to characterize this population and reproduce our results is essential.