Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is characterized by atherosclerotic arterial occlusive disease of the lower extremities and is associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in addition to disabling clinical sequelae, including intermittent claudication and chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Given the growing burden of disease, knowledge of modern practices to prevent MACE and major adverse limb events (MALE) is essential. This review article examines evidence for medical management of PAD and its associated risk factors, as well as wound prevention and care.

A thorough review of the literature was performed, with attention to evidence for the management of modifiable atherosclerotic risk factors, claudication symptoms, wound prevention, and wound care.

Contemporary management of PAD requires a multi-faceted approach to care, with medical optimization of smoking, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes mellitus. The use of supervised exercise therapy for intermittent claudication is highlighted. The anatomic disease patterns of smoking and diabetes mellitus are discussed further, and best practices for diabetic foot ulcer prevention, including offloading footwear, are described. Quality wound care is essential in this patient population and involves strategic use of debridement, wound-healing adjuncts, and skin substitutes, when appropriate.

The objective of medical management of PAD is to reduce the risk of MACE and MALE. Atherosclerotic risk factor optimization, appropriate wound care, and management of diabetic foot ulcers, foot infections, gangrene, and chronic, non-healing wounds are critical components of PAD care. Interdisciplinary care is essential to coordinate care, leverage expertise, and improve outcomes.

The symptomatic upper extremity peripheral artery disease (sUE-PAD) is poorly studied compared with the lower extremity peripheral artery disease (LE-PAD). We aimed to describe sUE-PAD etiologies and outcomes at 2 years. From an observational survey conducted in two French tertiary hospitals, demographic characteristics, etiology, treatment, and outcomes during follow-up were collected on patients with ICD-10 I74.2 code (arterial thrombosis of the upper limbs). We identified 181 patients (53% male, 55 ± 17 years) with hypothenar hammer syndrome (13.8%), cardioembolism (13.3%), atheroma (12.7%), or connective tissue disease (10.5%). No etiology could be found for 16.0% of them. The amputation rate was 13.3%, and lasting symptoms remained at 21.3%. During follow-up, atrial fibrillation occurred in 1 patient and cancer in 4. At 2 years, 59 patients were lost to follow-up, 110 patients were alive, and 12 patients had died. Age and cancer were associated with death. sUE-PAD is not benign, with 20% impaired upper extremity outcome and 10% overall mortality at 2 years. Less frequent than LE-PAD, sUE-PAD presents different characteristics: more women, younger age, and a broad spectrum of etiologies. sUE-PAD requires thorough etiological assessment and is considered to be associated with a severe overall prognosis.

The new guidelines for the management of peripheral arterial and aortic diseases (PAAD) from the European Society of Cardiology and endorsed by the European Society of Vascular Medicine (ESVM), emphasize on a comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach focusing on prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of patients with a wide range of PAAD, including lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD). The aim of this summary, focusing on PAD and coordinated by the Young Academy of ESVM, is to provide young angiologists with the fundamental principles of these guidelines and to assist them in navigating their everyday clinical practice. PAD diagnosis relies on objective evaluation of flow/oxygen reduction at rest, with arterial ultrasound as the first imaging modality to confirm the presence of arterial lesions. The main goals of PAD management are not only to improve functioning and prevent the occurrence of adverse events at the lower limb level, but also to reduce the overall atherosclerotic burden and achieve the general well-being of patients. To this end, traditional and nontraditional cardiovascular risk factors need to be properly addressed through lifestyle changes and tailored drug therapies. For patients with exertional limb symptoms, supervised exercise training is recommended. Interventional treatment is indicated for limb salvage in patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia and may also be discussed in a multidisciplinary setting in less severe patients with persisting symptoms and reduced quality of life after a minimum period of optimal medical treatment including exercise therapy. For trainees or young specialists in Angiology/Vascular Medicine, these guidelines provide essential elements to improve patient management, encourage interdisciplinary collaboration, and ensure an integrated approach to vascular diseases.

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a manifestation of systemic atherosclerosis. It is often associated with coronary and/or cerebral vascular involvement, leading to a higher risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, among which myocardial infarction, stroke, and death. Cardiovascular prevention has proven effective in reducing the progression of the disease and early diagnosis leads to more rapid initiation of medical therapy. However, revascularization of the diseased segment represents the only solution in the manifest and symptomatic forms of the disease.

Surgical treatment has historically represented the first treatment of PAD, which consists in the creation of bypasses excluding the obstructed segment. Nowadays, endovascular treatment represents in many cases the first line of intervention. Drug-coated balloons are a cornerstone solution for the treatment of peripheral lesions and are supported by multiple trials demonstrating their efficacy and safety.

New devices, such as sirolimus-eluting balloons, and also new eluting technologies will further improve the efficacy and the results of peripheral angioplasty. In the next years, we will experience the routinary use of new techniques currently under study. In this review, we will discuss the role of drug-coated balloons in the treatment of PAD.

In this subanalysis of the EXPAND study, we evaluated the risks and benefits of rivaroxaban plus antiplatelet therapy (APT) for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) complicated by stable coronary artery disease (CAD), ischemic stroke, or peripheral artery disease (PAD).

From the EXPAND study population (n=7,141), patients with NVAF complicated by stable CAD (n=886), ischemic stroke (n=1,231), or PAD (n=160) were included. Patients complicated by any of them were set as ALL (n=2,030). Patients were all treated with rivaroxaban (10 or 15 mg/day) with (+) or without (-) APT. Efficacy outcomes were symptomatic stroke＋systemic embolism (SE), symptomatic stroke＋SE＋myocardial infarction＋cardiovascular death, and all-cause death. Safety outcomes included major and any bleeding. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for differences between the APT(+) and APT(-) groups.

There were no significant differences in the efficacy outcomes between the APT(+) and APT(-) groups in the ALL cohort or in the CAD and STROKE sub-cohorts. In the PAD subcohort, the HR [95% CI] for all-cause death in the APT(+) group increased (4.43 [1.05-18.71]; p=0.043). In the APT(+) group, the HR [95% CI] for any bleeding increased in the ALL cohort (1.28 [1.01-1.62]; p=0.044) and STROKE subcohort (1.42 [1.01-2.01]; p=0.047), and for major bleeding in the CAD subcohort (2.00 [1.01-3.93]; p=0.046).

Rivaroxaban with APT did not reduce ischemic outcomes in patients with stable CAD or ischemic stroke; however, it did increase the risk of bleeding in patients with stable CAD or ischemic stroke.

Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) undergo lower extremity revascularization (LER) for symptomatic relief or limb salvage. Despite LER, patients remain at increased risk of platelet-mediated complications, such as major adverse cardiac and limb events (MACLEs). Platelet activity is associated with cardiovascular events, yet little is known about the dynamic nature of platelet activity over time. We, therefore, investigated the change in platelet activity over time and its association with long-term cardiovascular risk.

Patients with PAD undergoing LER were enrolled into the multicenter, prospective Platelet Activity and Cardiovascular Events study. Platelet aggregation was assessed by light transmission aggregometry to submaximal epinephrine (0.4 μmol/L) immediately before LER, and on postoperative day 1 or 2 (POD1 or POD2) and 30 (POD30). A hyperreactive platelet phenotype was defined as >60% aggregation. Patients were followed longitudinally for MACLEs, defined as the composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, major lower extremity amputation, or acute limb ischemia leading to reintervention.

Among 287 patients undergoing LER, the mean age was 70 ± 11 years, 33% were female, 61% were White, and 89% were on baseline antiplatelet therapy. Platelet aggregation to submaximal epinephrine induced a bimodal response; 15.5%, 16.8%, and 16.4% of patients demonstrated a hyperreactive platelet phenotype at baseline, POD1, and POD30, respectively. Platelet aggregation increased by 18.5% (P = .001) from baseline to POD1, which subsequently returned to baseline at POD30. After a median follow-up of 19 months, MACLEs occurred in 165 patients (57%). After adjustment for demographics, clinical risk factors, procedure type, and antiplatelet therapy, platelet hyperreactivity at POD1 was associated with a significant hazard of long-term MACLE (adjusted hazard ratio, 4.61; 95% confidence interval, 2.08-10.20; P < .001).

Among patients with severe PAD, platelet activity increases after LER. Platelet hyperreactivity to submaximal epinephrine on POD1 is associated with long-term MACLE. Platelet activity after LER may represent a modifiable biomarker associated with excess cardiovascular risk.

Surgical site infections (SSI) are the most common complication following lower extremity bypass (LEB) surgery. SSIs contribute to significant patient morbidity and healthcare expenditure, and accurate detection of SSIs remains an important step in reduction efforts. In this study, we aimed to characterize early-onset SSIs among patients undergoing LEB surgery.

Institutional medical records were retrospectively queried for all LEB operations performed across 3 hospitals from 2018 to 2022. All SSIs within a 90-day postoperative period were included, per CDC definition, and categorized as early- (within 7 days of operation), standard- (8-30 days), or delayed-onset (31-90 days). The Southampton grading scale was used to stratify the severity of infection (grade 2, erythema; grade 3, erythema with serous drainage; grade 4; erythema with purulent drainage; or grade 5, severe wound necrosis). Data were analyzed using univariate tests and logistic regression analysis.

A total of 517 LEB operations were performed over the 5-year study period. Median follow-up period was 18.5 months. Early-, standard-, and delayed-onset SSIs were diagnosed in 2.9% (n = 15), 15.1% (n = 78), and 4.6% (n = 24) of the patients, respectively. Compared with standard- and delayed-onset groups, patients with early-onset SSIs were more frequently nonsmokers (26.7% vs. 3.9% vs. 8.3%, P = 0.03) and had lower prevalence of comorbidities. Early-onset SSIs most frequently presented as Southampton grade 2 (60.0%) or grade 5 (20.0%) infections, whereas standard- and delayed-onset SSIs were more evenly distributed among grade 2 (30.4%), grade 3 (41.2%), and grade 4 (21.6%) presentations (P = 0.002). The most commonly isolated organisms among the early-onset SSI group were Gram-negative rods (20.0%). In comparison, polymicrobial infections (19.6%) and Gram-positive cocci (14.7%) were most common among standard- and delayed-onset groups (P = 0.04). The early-onset SSI group experienced a longer index hospitalization (11 vs. 6 vs. 8 days, P = 0.02) and lower 30-day readmission rates (13.3% vs. 59.0% vs. 45.8%, P = 0.005) compared with standard- and delayed-onset groups. On multivariate analysis, active smoking (hazard ratio [HR] 0.15, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02-0.98, P = 0.035), former smoking (HR 0.08, 95% CI, 0.01-0.71, P = 0.02), coronary artery disease (HR 0.15, 95% CI, 0.03-0.83, P = 0.03), and hypertension (HR 0.13, 95% CI, 0.03-0.68, P = 0.02) were associated with a lower risk of early-onset infection, when compared with patients suffering standard- and delayed-onset SSIs.

Early-onset SSIs after LEB surgery have a distinct clinical presentation, impact healthier patients, and are associated with more virulent organisms compared with standard- and delayed-onset SSIs.

There is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal antithrombotic therapy (ATT) after popliteal and infrapopliteal (PIP) endovascular therapy (EVT). Currently, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 3 months and single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) are the most prescribed regimens in the Netherlands. Thus far, no randomized comparison has been performed on the optimal ATT approach. Therefore, this study compared the efficacy and safety of 3-month DAPT with SAPT following PIP EVT.

Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from a multicenter registry.

The Dutch chronic lower limb-threatening ischemia registry (THRILLER) collected prospective data on patients enrolled between January 2021 and October 2023. As for ATT, only patients prescribed antiplatelet therapy (APT), were included in this analysis. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of 3-month major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs, ie, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular event, cardiovascular death), major adverse limb events (MALEs, ie, major amputation, reintervention), and non-cardiovascular death. Secondary efficacy outcomes were 3-month MACE, MALE, and all-cause mortality. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding according to the 'Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction' (TIMI) classification. Descriptive statistics and Cox proportional hazard models were applied.

In total, 460 of 840 THRILLER patients used DAPT or SAPT as ATT and were therefore included in the analysis. Of these, 322 (70%) received DAPT and 138 (30%) received SAPT. In total, 73 (15.9%) primary efficacy outcomes were observed of which 21 (15.2%) events in the SAPT group and 52 (16.1%) events in the DAPT group. No significant differences were observed between SAPT and DAPT for the primary efficacy outcomes or any of the secondary efficacy outcomes. In both groups, one case of major bleeding was observed.

The findings suggest that 3 months of DAPT is not superior to SAPT. A well-powered randomized trial is warranted to assess the efficacy and safety of post-procedural DAPT in chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) patients undergoing PIP EVT.

This manuscript reports on the efficacy and safety outcomes of 3 months of DAPT versus SAPT, which are commonly chosen therapies following popliteal and infrapopliteal endovascular therapy. No significant difference was found between the two groups regarding major adverse cardiovascular events, all-cause death, major amputation, or major bleeding. Therefore, 3 months of DAPT does not seem superior to SAPT. These results suggest that SAPT appears to be a sufficient alternative when considering 3 months of DAPT. Further research should verify these outcomes and focus on the efficacy and safety of prolonged DAPT suppletion after endovascular therapy.

The peroneal artery is known to give branches to the anterior and posterior tibial arteries. Scattered reports in the literature over the last decade failed to provide solid evidence as to the optimum strategy for below-knee targeted revascularization in limited-option patients with critical limb-treating ischemia (CLTI). We sought to determine the benefit of performing single peroneal tibial artery angioplasty revascularization compared with single non-peroneal angiosome-targeted tibial artery angioplasty revascularization for patients presented with CLTI.

We performed a two-center, retrospective cohort study of patients presented with CLTI treated with below-the-knee endovascular intervention from January 2020 to January 2022. Group 1 included patients who were treated with single peroneal tibial artery angioplasty revascularization. Group 2 included patients who were treated with single non-peroneal tibial artery angioplasty revascularization. Patients had no proximal lesions or previous intervention to tibial arteries. The primary endpoint is limb salvage. The secondary endpoints include wound healing and all-cause mortality.

This study included 45 patients presented with critical limb ischemia, they were treated with single angiosome-targeted tibial angioplasty revascularization, they were divided into 13 patients (28.9%) with single peroneal revascularization (group 1) and 32 patients (71.1%) with single non-peroneal revascularization (group 2), 20 patients (44.4%) had target anterior tibial artery, while 12 patients (26.7%) had target posterior tibial artery. The follow-up duration was 6 months. No difference was found in limb salvage between the two groups (92.3% vs. 87.1%; P=1). No differences were found in wound healing rates between the two groups (76.9% vs. 81.3%; P=0.281). The overall 30-day survival rate was 100% in both study groups.

Single peroneal tibial revascularization mostly is non-inferior to single non-peroneal angiosome targeted tibial artery revascularization regarding limb salvage and wound healing for patients with critical limb ischemia.

To highlight current evidence pertaining to the measurement methods and prevalence of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) in patients with PAD, as well as to evaluate the relationship between HTPR and recurrent adverse cardiovascular and limb events in PAD patients.

A systematic review of English-language literature on HTPR in patients with PAD. An electronic literature search of PubMed and Medline was performed in May 2021.

A total of 29 studies with a total number of 11,201 patients with PAD were identified. HTPR during clopidogrel treatment ranges from 9.8 to 77%, and during aspirin treatment ranges from 4.1 to 50% of PAD patients. HTPR was associated with adverse clinical outcomes. The need for limb revascularisation was higher in patients with HTPR during clopidogrel use. Similarly, HTPR during aspirin use in the PAD population was predictive of adverse cardiovascular events (HR 3.73; 95% CI, 1.43-9.81; p = .007). A wide range of techniques were applied to measure platelet resistance, without consensus on cut-off values. Furthermore, differing patient populations, a variety of antiplatelet regimens, and differing clinical endpoints highlight the high degree of heterogeneity in the studies included in this review.

No consensus on technique or cut-off values for HTPR testing has been reached. Patients with HTPR are potentially at a greater risk of adverse limb-related and cardiovascular events than patients sensitive to antiplatelet therapy illustrating the need for clinical implementation of HTPR testing. Future research must aim for consistent methodology. Adaptation of antiplatelet therapy based on HTPR results requires further exploration.

Background: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a complex, heterogeneous condition that has become a leading health concern globally. Peripheral arterial disease often co-exists with other vascular disease states, including cerebrovascular and cardiovascular disease. Optimal therapy for managing symptoms and progression of disease employs non-pharmacological, pharmacological, and contemporary revascularisation techniques to improve clinical outcomes and quality of life. However, large well-designed randomised control trials (RCT) and corresponding evidence-based guidelines for management of PAD are lacking, with current practice standards often extrapolated from evidence in coronary artery disease. Purpose: This review article aims to discuss currently accepted best pharmacological practice for PAD. Method: Relevant articles were searched between May 2023 and January 2024 through PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar and international guidelines, focusing on pharmacological management for PAD. Results: This narrative review discusses holistic pharmacological treatments for PAD.

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a progressive atherosclerotic disease that causes lower extremity arterial stenosis or occlusion. Patients with PAD are at increased risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, limitations in ambulation, and amputation. Despite the advances in medicine and technology, the outcomes from PAD, including critical limb-threatening ischemia, acute limb ischemia amputation, and mortality, remain increased among specific racial and ethnic groups that have been historically marginalized in America, including Black, Hispanic, and American Indian individuals in the United States when compared with White persons. The purpose of this review is to summarize PAD literature that incorporates racial and ethnic disparities in PAD. There are a rising number of studies focused on the interface of racial and ethnic disparities and PAD. The majority of these studies are specifically focused on Black race, whereas there are limited studies focused on other minoritized racial and ethnic groups in the United States. The application of race and ethnicity has also been shown to play a synergistic role with socioeconomic status on PAD outcomes. Effective strategies focused on implementing policies that support quality measures and focus on social determinants of health have been shown to promote health equity and reduce disparities. Current evidence suggests that biological differences are less likely to be the leading cause of disparities in PAD between racial and ethnic groups compared with White Americans and supports a renewed focus on social determinants of health to achieve health equity.

Over the past decades, there have been great advancements in the antithrombotic management of patients undergoing percutaneous interventions, but most of the available evidence derives from studies conducted in the setting of cardiac interventions. Antithrombotic treatment regimens used in patients undergoing percutaneous cardiac interventions, in particular coronary, are frequently extrapolated to patients undergoing noncardiac interventions. However, the differences in risk profile of the population treated and the types of interventions performed may translate into differences is the safety and efficacy associated with antithrombotic therapy. Noncardiac percutaneous interventions are commonly performed in patients at high bleeding risk, which may indeed impact outcomes, hence underscoring the importance of risk stratification to guide clinical decision-making processes. In this review, we appraise the available evidence on antithrombotic therapy in high-bleeding-risk patients undergoing noncardiac percutaneous interventions.

Patients with symptomatic lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD) are recommended to receive antiplatelet therapy, while direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are standard for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). For patients with concomitant LEAD and AF, data comparing dual antithrombotic therapy (an antiplatelet agent used in conjunction with a DOAC) vs. DOAC monotherapy are scarce. This retrospective cohort study, based on data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of these antithrombotic strategies.

Patients with AF who underwent revascularisation for LEAD between 2012 - 2020 and received any DOAC within 30 days of discharge were included. Patients were grouped by antiplatelet agent exposure into the dual antithrombotic therapy and DOAC monotherapy groups. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to mitigate selection bias. Major adverse limb events (MALEs), ischaemic stroke or systemic embolism, and bleeding outcomes were compared. Patients were followed until the occurrence of any study outcome, death, or up to two years.

A total of 1 470 patients were identified, with 736 in the dual antithrombotic therapy group and 734 in the DOAC monotherapy group. Among them, 1 346 patients received endovascular therapy as the index revascularisation procedure and 124 underwent bypass surgery. At two years, dual antithrombotic therapy was associated with a higher risk of MALEs than DOAC monotherapy (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] 1.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15 - 1.56), primarily driven by increased repeat revascularisation. Dual antithrombotic therapy was also associated with a higher risk of major bleeding (SHR 1.43, 95% CI 1.05 - 1.94) and gastrointestinal bleeding (SHR 2.17, 95% CI 1.42 - 3.33) than DOAC monotherapy.

In patients with concomitant LEAD and AF who underwent peripheral revascularisation, DOAC monotherapy was associated with a lower risk of MALEs and bleeding events than dual antithrombotic therapy.

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a progressive disease associated with the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular and limb events and elevated mortality rates. Symptoms of PAD, including claudication and chronic limb-threatening ischemia, impair functional capacity and lead to lower quality of life. The focus of current therapies is to minimize symptoms, improve quality of life, and reduce adverse cardiovascular and limb events. Among the medical therapies are antiplatelets, anticoagulants, antihypertensives, lipid lowering therapies, cilostazol and pentoxifylline, and novel blood sugar-lowering therapies, plus exercise therapy and smoking cessation. In this review, we discuss these evidence-based medical therapies that are available for patients with symptomatic PAD.

There is significant practice variation in the use of antithrombotic therapy after endovascular intervention for lower limb peripheral arterial disease, with differences in medication choice and duration. Prescriber decision making is complex, and patient factors have been shown to substantially contribute to prescribing variation. To determine the influence of patient factors on antithrombotic prescribing, a discrete choice experiment was distributed to vascular surgeons and trainees across Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand.

After pilot testing, the discrete choice experiment questionnaire was distributed to 300 vascular surgeons and trainee members of the Australian and New Zealand Society for Vascular Surgery. Multinomial logistic regression models were used to analyse patient factors that had the most influence on decisions to prescribe a second antithrombotic agent, and the preferred choice of antithrombotic (clopidogrel 75 mg daily or rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily) in addition to aspirin 100 mg daily. The odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) reported preference strength.

A total of 44 questionnaires were completed between September and October 2023, reaching the 15% targeted response rate. Prescribing a second antithrombotic was more likely after femoropopliteal stenting compared with angioplasty (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.20 - 2.13), and in chronic limb threatening ischaemia compared with intermittent claudication (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.20 - 2.13). Most respondents preferred clopidogrel over rivaroxaban (62%), with over a third of respondents exclusively prescribing clopidogrel. Patients with stents (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.32 - 2.37) or moderate bleeding risk (OR 1.38, 95% CI 0.97 - 1.84) were more likely to receive clopidogrel than rivaroxaban.

This study demonstrates that vascular surgeons primarily prioritise antithrombotic prescribing decisions by procedure type. Clopidogrel is more likely to be prescribed than rivaroxaban as a second agent in combination with aspirin, especially after stenting. Knowing these clinician preferences can target implementation strategies towards supporting decision making in subgroups of patients according to individual risk profiles.

Ticagrelor is a novel oral antiplatelet agent which can selectively inhibit P2Y12 receptor. Bleeding and dyspnea are common adverse reactions of ticagrelor in clinic. The side effects of ticagrelor are correlated with the plasma concentration of ticagrelor.

This study aimed to evaluate the catalytic characteristics of 22 CYP3A4 alleles identified in the Chinese Han population on the metabolism of ticagrelor in vitro, focusing on the effect of CYP3A4 polymorphism on ticagrelor metabolism.

In this study, insect cells were used to express 22 CYP3A4 variants, which were then incubated with 1-50 µM ticagrelor at 37 °C for 30 minutes to obtain the metabolite (AR-C124910XX). AR-C124910XX was detected by UHPLC-MS/MS to calculate the kinetic parameters, including Km, Vmax and CLint.

Compared to the wild-type, most CYP3A4 alleles exhibited significant differences in intrinsic clearance. The intrinsic clearance of CYP3A4*11, *18 and *33 was much higher than that of wild-type; four variants exhibited similar intrinsic clearance values as the wild-type enzyme; The remaining 14 variants showed significantly reduced intrinsic clearance values, ranging from 1.48% to 75.11% of the wild-type; CYP3A4*30 displayed weak or no activity.

This study conducted a comprehensive assessment of the effect of CYP3A4 variants on ticagrelor's metabolism. The results suggested that there is allele-specific activity towards ticagrelor in vitro. These findings can provide some insights and predictions for treatment strategies and risk assessments associated with ticagrelor in clinical practice.

Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) experience major cardiovascular and limb events. Antithrombotic strategies including antiplatelets and anticoagulants remain a cornerstone of treatment and prevention. Recent trials have shown heterogeneity in the response to antithrombotic therapies in patients presenting primarily with PAD when compared to those presenting primarily with coronary artery disease. In addition, there is observed heterogeneity with regards to the effects of antiplatelets and anticoagulants with respect to different outcomes including cardiovascular and major adverse limb events. This, coupled with risks of bleeding, requires a patient-centered and holistic assessment of benefit-risk when selecting antithrombotic strategies for patients with PAD. A global multidisciplinary work group was convened to evaluate antithrombotic strategies in PAD and to summarize the current state of the art. Common clinical scenarios around antithrombotic decision making were provided. Finally, insights with regard to implementation future investigation were described.

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and lower-extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) are growing global health problems associated with considerable cardiovascular (CV) and limb-related morbidity and mortality, poor quality of life and high healthcare resource use and costs. Diabetes is a well-known risk factor for PAD, and the occurrence of PAD in people with T2D further increases the risk of long-term complications. As the available evidence is primarily focused on the overall PAD population, we undertook a systematic review to describe the burden of comorbid PAD in people with T2D. The MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies including people with T2D and comorbid PAD published from 2012 to November 2021, with no restriction on PAD definition, study design or country. Hand searching of conference proceedings, reference lists of included publications and relevant identified reviews and global burden of disease reports complemented the searches. We identified 86 eligible studies, mostly observational and conducted in Asia and Europe, presenting data on the epidemiology (n = 62) and on the clinical (n = 29), humanistic (n = 12) and economic burden (n = 12) of PAD in people with T2D. The most common definition of PAD relied on ankle-brachial index values ≤ 0.9 (alone or with other parameters). Incidence and prevalence varied substantially across studies; nonetheless, four large multinational randomised controlled trials found that 12.5%-22% of people with T2D had comorbid PAD. The presence of PAD in people with T2D was a major cause of lower-limb and CV complications and of all-cause and CV mortality. Overall, PAD was associated with poor quality of life, and with substantial healthcare resource use and costs. To our knowledge, this systematic review provides the most comprehensive overview of the evidence on the burden of PAD in people with T2D to date. In this population, there is an urgent unmet need for disease-modifying agents to improve outcomes.

The aim of this prospective study was to (1) objectively quantify the impact of sex on platelet function in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) taking antiplatelet and anticoagulant medications and (2) to develop and test a personalized, iterative algorithm that personalizes thromboprophylaxis that incorporates platelet function testing.

Women with PAD have worse outcomes as compared with their male counterparts despite having lower risk factors. This health disparity may be mitigated by personalizing thromboprophylaxis regimens.

Patients undergoing revascularization were enrolled. Serial thromboelastography (TEG) and TEG with platelet mapping (TEG-PM) were performed up to 6 months postoperatively to determine objective coagulation profiles. In a subset of patients, the Antiplatelet Coagulation Exactness (ACE) algorithm was implemented, where patients were iteratively evaluated with TEG and given antiplatelet medications to maintain platelet inhibition at >29%. Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired t test, analysis of variance, and Fisher exact test.

One hundred eighty-one patients met the study criteria. Fifty-eight (32%) patients were females and 123 (68%) were males. In the Aspirin cohort, females showed significantly greater clot strength as maximum amplitude - arachidonic acid (MA AA ) and significantly lower platelet inhibition than males: (37.26 vs 32.38, P <0.01) and (52.95% vs 61.65%, P <0.05), respectively. In the Clopidogrel cohort, females showed higher Maximum Amplitude - Adenosine Diphosphate (MA ADP ) (42.58 vs 40.35, P = not significant [NS]) compared with males. Females on dual antiplatelet therapy had higher MA ADP (39.74 vs 35.07, P =NS) and lower platelet inhibition (45.25% vs 54.99%, P= NS) than males. The incidence of thrombosis of the revascularized segment, defined as thrombotic event, was objectively identified on an arterial duplex. Women showed significantly higher thrombotic events than men (22.95% vs 10.57%, P< 0.05) on the same medication. In our pilot study, implementation of the ACE algorithm led to a significant decrease in the thrombosis rate (3%), including nonthrombotic events for females, versus the historic thrombotic rate (22%) from our institution.

Women with PAD exhibited higher platelet reactivity, clot strength, and reduced platelet inhibition in response to antiplatelet therapy. The use of the ACE algorithm to tailor antiplatelet medication in patients with PAD post-revascularization, resulted in a significant decrease in thrombotic event rates. This may serve as an opportune way to mitigate outcome sex-specific disparities caused by inadequate thromboprophylaxis in women.

This review summarizes the findings of preclinical studies evaluating the pleiotropic effects of ticagrelor. These include attenuation of ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI), inflammation, adverse cardiac remodeling, and atherosclerosis. In doing so, it aims to provide novel insights into ticagrelor's mechanisms and benefits over other P2Y12 inhibitors. It also generates viable hypotheses for the results of seminal clinical trials assessing ticagrelor use in acute and chronic coronary syndromes.

A comprehensive review of the preclinical literature demonstrates that ticagrelor protects against IRI in the setting of both an acute myocardial infarction (MI), and when MI occurs while on chronic treatment. Maintenance therapy with ticagrelor also likely mitigates adverse inflammation, cardiac remodeling, and atherosclerosis, while improving stem cell recruitment. These effects are probably mediated by ticagrelor's ability to increase local interstitial adenosine levels which activate downstream cardio-protective molecules. Attenuation and augmentation of these pleiotropic effects by high-dose aspirin and caffeine, and statins respectively may help explain variable outcomes in PLATO and subsequent randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Most RCTs and meta-analyses have not evaluated the pleiotropic effects of ticagrelor. We need further studies comparing cardiovascular outcomes in patients treated with ticagrelor versus other P2Y12 inhibitors that are mindful of the unique pleiotropic advantages afforded by ticagrelor, as well as possible interactions with other therapies (e.g., aspirin, statins, caffeine).

Balancing the safety and efficacy of antithrombotic agents in patients with gastrointestinal disorders is challenging because of the potential for interference with the absorption of antithrombotic drugs and for an increased risk of bleeding. In this Review, we address considerations for enteral antithrombotic therapy in patients with cardiovascular disease and gastrointestinal comorbidities. For those with gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), we summarize a general scheme for risk stratification and clinical evidence on risk reduction approaches, such as limiting the use of concomitant medications that increase the risk of GIB and the potential utility of gastrointestinal protection strategies (such as proton pump inhibitors or histamine type 2 receptor antagonists). Furthermore, we summarize the best available evidence and potential gaps in our knowledge on tailoring antithrombotic therapy in patients with active or recent GIB and in those at high risk of GIB but without active or recent GIB. Finally, we review the recommendations provided by major medical societies, highlighting the crucial role of teamwork and multidisciplinary discussions to customize the antithrombotic regimen in patients with coexisting cardiovascular and gastrointestinal diseases.

Antiplatelet therapy (APT) is the standard of care after endovascular revascularization (EVR) in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). APT aims to prevent both major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and major adverse limb events (MALE). Nonetheless, the rates of MACE and MALE after EVR remain high. In coronary artery and cerebrovascular disease, dual APT (DAPT)compared to acetylsalicylic acid alone has been proven to reduce MACE without increasing the risk of major bleeding when applied for a restricted number of weeks. However, within the PAD population, insufficient data are available to understand the potential attributable effect of DAPT over single APT (SAPT). Therefore, prospective randomized studies in targeted study populations are warranted.

CLEAR-PATH is a Dutch multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial comparing SAPT (clopidogrel 75 mg plus placebo) with DAPT (clopidogrel 75 mg plus acetylsalicylic acid 80 mg) in patients with PAD undergoing EVR. CLEAR-PATH includes a time-to-event analysis with a follow-up of one year. The primary composite efficacy endpoint consists of all-cause mortality, nonfatal stroke, nonfatal myocardial infarction, severe limb ischemia, (indication for) re-intervention due to any symptomatic restenosis, re-occlusion, or due to acute limb ischemia, and major amputation. The primary safety endpoint contains major bleeding following the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction classification. The enrolment started in August 2022. In total 450 primary efficacy outcome events are required which expectedly amounts to 1696 subjects. Recruitment will take approximately 36 months.

CLEAR-PATH will assess the efficacy and safety of DAPT compared to SAPT following EVR in PAD patients.

NL80009.041.21.

Underutilization of therapies to reduce ischemic risk in peripheral artery disease (PAD) persists.

The purpose was to conduct an implementation trial of lipid management in vascular disease.

The OPTIMIZE PAD-1 (Implementation of Vascular Care Team to Improve Medical Management of PAD Patients) trial randomized patients with peripheral artery disease with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≥70 mg/dL to management via a vascular care team including a clinical pharmacist and an algorithm of intensive lipid management to achieve goal LDL-C in 1 step vs usual care plus provider education. Medications were obtained using commercial insurance. The primary endpoint was percent change in LDL-C at 12 months.

Of 166 enrolled patients, 74.2% did not have an LDL-C level at goal. Among 114 randomized patients (mean age 66 years, 36.0% women, and 15.8% Black), 50.9% received high-intensity statin, and 7.9% received ezetimibe at baseline. The mean 12-month LDL-C change was -49.1% (95% CI: -58.7% to -39.5%) with vascular care team management and -5.4% (95% CI: -15.3% to 4.6%) with usual care; the between-group least-squares mean difference was -43.7% (95% CI: -57.6% to -29.9%; P < 0.0001). Mean LDL-C was reduced in vascular care team patients from 100.6 mg/dL at baseline to 54.8 and 50.1 mg/dL by week 4 and month 12, respectively. At 12 months, vascular care team patients were >3 times as likely to achieve LDL-C <70 mg/dL and 8 times as likely to achieve LDL-C <55 mg/dL (P < 0.0001) than usual care.

OPTIMIZE PAD-1 showed that an interprofessional, algorithm-based program can achieve rapid LDL-C lowering in vascular patients using available insurance and therapies, and LDL-C targets can be met in most patients if enabled by optimized systems of care.

The "2024 ACC/AHA/AACVPR/APMA/ABC/SCAI/SVM/SVN/SVS/SIR/VESS Guideline for the Management of Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, chronic symptomatic, chronic limb-threatening ischemia, and acute limb ischemia).

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from October 2020 to June 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that was published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through May 2023 during the peer review process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables where appropriate.

Recommendations from the "2016 AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Patients With Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with peripheral artery disease have been developed.

To describe our experiences implementing and iterating CYP2C19 genotype-guided clopidogrel pharmacogenetic clinical decision support (CDS) tools over time in the setting of a large health system-wide, preemptive pharmacogenomics program.

Clopidogrel-treated patients who are genetically predicted cytochrome P450 isozyme 2C19 (CYP2C19) intermediate or poor metabolizers have an increased risk of atherothrombotic events, some of which can be life-threatening. The Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium provides guidance for the use of clopidogrel based on CYP2C19 genotype in patients with cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Our multidisciplinary team implemented an automated, interruptive alert that fires when clopidogrel is ordered or refilled for biobank participants with structured CYP2C19 intermediate or poor metabolizer genomic indicators in the electronic health record. The implementation began with a narrow cardiovascular indication and setting and was then scaled in 4 primary dimensions: (1) clinical indication; (2) availability across health-system locations; (3) care venue (e.g., inpatient vs outpatient); and (4) provider groups (eg, cardiology and neurology). We iterated our approach over time based on evolving clinical evidence and proactive strategies to optimize CDS maintenance and sustainability. A key facilitator of expansion was socialization of the broader pharmacogenomics initiative among our academic medical center community, accompanied by clinician acceptance of pharmacogenetic alerts in practice.

A multidisciplinary collaboration is recommended to facilitate the use of CYP2C19 genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy in patients with cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Evolving clopidogrel pharmacogenetic evidence necessitates thoughtful iteration of implementation efforts and strategies to optimize long-term maintenance and sustainability.

The "2024 ACC/AHA/AACVPR/APMA/ABC/SCAI/SVM/SVN/SVS/SIR/VESS Guideline for the Management of Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, chronic symptomatic, chronic limb-threatening ischemia, and acute limb ischemia).

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from October 2020 to June 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that was published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through May 2023 during the peer review process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables where appropriate.

Recommendations from the "2016 AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Patients With Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with peripheral artery disease have been developed.

Ticagrelor is a platelet P2Y12 receptor inhibitor approved for use in patients with acute coronary syndromes, coronary artery disease, and low-moderate risk acute ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack. Clinical trials have evaluated the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor on ischemic and bleeding outcomes for different indications and with varying treatment approaches. As a result, there is a large body of clinical evidence demonstrating different degrees of net clinical benefit compared with other platelet inhibitor drugs based on indication, patient characteristics, clinical presentation, treatment duration, and other factors. We provide a review of the major trials of ticagrelor in the context of other randomized trials of clopidogrel and prasugrel to organize the volume of available information, elevate corroborating and conflicting data, and identify potential gaps as areas for further exploration of optimal antiplatelet treatment.

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is the third leading cause of atherosclerotic morbidity after coronary heart disease and stroke yet is widely underdiagnosed and undertreated. Treatment of risk factors such as diabetes and cigarette smoking can benefit patients with PAD. Patients should have adequate blood pressure and lipid control to decrease clinical manifestations and symptoms of PAD. Use of antithrombotic medications should be individualized to the patient depending on the presence of symptoms, revascularization, and comorbidities. All patient care providers, including physicians, pharmacists, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants, should incorporate PAD screening in their at-risk patients to improve access for appropriate earlier diagnosis, initiation of guideline directed therapy, and risk factor modification to reduce both major adverse CV and limb outcomes. The purpose of this narrative review is to provide an overview of PAD and summarize clinical trial evidence and guideline recommendations for screening and treatment to increase awareness among health care providers to ultimately have a positive impact on patient care.

Polyvascular disease has a significant global burden and is associated with increased risk of major adverse cardiac events with each additional vascular territory involved. The purpose of this review is to highlight the risk factors, associated outcomes, emerging genetic markers, and evidence for screening and treatment of polyvascular disease.

Polyvascular disease is the presence of atherosclerosis in two or more vascular beds. It has a significant global burden, with a prevalence of 30-70% in patients with known atherosclerosis. Patients with polyvascular disease experience elevated rates of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and stroke, especially among high-risk subgroups like those with type 2 diabetes mellitus and there is a step-wise increased risk of adverse outcomes with each additional vascular territory involved. Genetic analyses demonstrate that some individuals may carry a genetic predisposition, while others exhibit higher levels of atherogenic lipoproteins and inflammatory markers. Routine screening for asymptomatic disease is not currently recommended by major cardiovascular societies unless patients are high-risk. While there are no established protocols for escalating treatment, existing guidelines advocate for lipid-lowering therapy. Additionally, recent studies have demonstrated benefit from antithrombotic agents, such as P2Y12 inhibitors and low-dose anticoagulation, but the optimal timing and dosage of these agents has not been established, and the ischemic benefit must be balanced against the increased risk of bleeding in the polyvascular population. Due to the high prevalence and risks associated with polyvascular disease, early identification and treatment intensification are crucial to reduce disease progression. Future research is needed to develop screening protocols and determine the optimal timing and dosing of therapy to prevent ischemic events.

The diabetic foot interacts with anatomical, vascular, and neurological factors that challenge clinical practice. This study aimed to compile the primary scientific evidence based on a review of the main guidelines, in addition to articles published on the Embase, Lilacs, and PubMed platforms. The European Society of Cardiology system was used to develop recommendation classes and levels of evidence. The themes were divided into six chapters (Chapter 1 - Prevention of foot ulcers in people with diabetes; Chapter 2 - Pressure relief from foot ulcers in people with diabetes; Chapter 3 -Classifications of diabetic foot ulcers; Chapter 4 - Foot and peripheral artery disease; Chapter 5 - Infection and the diabetic foot; Chapter 6 - Charcot's neuroarthropathy). This version of the Diabetic Foot Guidelines presents essential recommendations for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of patients with diabetic foot, offering an objective guide for medical practice.

Polyvascular disease is strongly associated with increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. However, its prevalence in patients undergoing carotid and lower extremity surgical revascularization and its impact on outcomes are unknown.

The Vascular Quality Initiative was queried for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or infrainguinal lower extremity bypass (LEB), 2013-2019. Polyvascular disease was defined as presence of atherosclerotic occlusive disease in more than one arterial bed: carotid, coronary, and infrainguinal. Primary outcomes were (1) composite perioperative myocardial infarction (MI) or death and (2) 5-year survival. Patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes were evaluated using the χ2 test and multivariable logistic regression. Survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards multivariable models.

Polyvascular disease was identified in 47% of CEA (39.0% in 2 arterial beds, 7.6% in 3 arterial beds; n = 93,736) and 47% of LEB (41.0% in 2 arterial beds, 5.7% in 3 arterial beds; n = 25,223). For both CEA and LEB, patients with polyvascular disease had more comorbidities including hypertension, congestive heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, smoking, diabetes mellitus, and end-stage renal disease (P < .0001). Perioperative MI/death rates increased with increasing number of vascular beds affected following CEA (0.9% in 1 bed vs 1.5% in 2 beds vs 2.7% in 3 beds; P < .001) and LEB (2.2% in 1 bed vs 5.3% in 2 beds vs 6.6% in 3 beds; P < .001). Polyvascular disease was associated independently with perioperative MI/death after CEA (odds ratio, 1.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.40-1.81;P < .0001) and LEB (odds ratio, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.52-2.08; P < .0001). Five-year survival was decreased in patients with polyvascular disease after CEA (82% in 3 beds vs 88% in 2 beds vs 92% in 1 bed; P < .01) and LEB (72% in 3 beds vs 75% in 2 beds vs 84% in 1 bed; P < .01) in a dose-dependent manner, with the lowest 5-year survival observed in those with three arterial beds involved. Polyvascular disease was independently associated with 5-year mortality after CEA (hazard ratio, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.24-1.40; P = .0001) and LEB (hazard ratio, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.20-1.41; P = .0001).

Polyvascular disease is common in patients undergoing CEA and LEB and is associated with a higher risk of perioperative MI/death and decreased long-term survival. After revascularization, patients with polyvascular disease should be considered for more aggressive cardioprotective medications and closer follow-up.