Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Surg. May 27, 2024; 16(5): 1328-1335
Published online May 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i5.1328
Published online May 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i5.1328
Table 1 Positive rates of GLI1 and PTTG1 in colorectal carcinoma tissue samples
Grouping | n | Cancerous tissue | Para-cancerous tissue | χ2 | P value |
GLI1 positive | 103 | 65 (63.11) | 13 (12.62) | 55.792 | < 0.001 |
PTTG1 positive | 103 | 58 (56.31) | 6 (5.83) | 61.292 | < 0.001 |
Table 2 Correlation of GLI1 expression with clinicopathological data of patients undergoing radical surgery for colorectal carcinoma
Grouping | n | GLI1 positive (n = 65), n (%) | GLI1 negative (n = 38), n (%) | χ2 | P value |
Sex | 0.403 | 0.526 | |||
Male | 53 | 35 (53.85) | 18 (47.37) | ||
Female | 50 | 30 (46.15) | 20 (52.63) | ||
Age | 3.504 | 0.061 | |||
< 60 yr old | 42 | 22 (33.85) | 20 (53.63) | ||
≥ 60 yr old | 61 | 43 (66.15) | 18 (47.37) | ||
Tumor location | 0.221 | 0.638 | |||
Colon | 43 | 26 (40.00) | 17 (44.74) | ||
Rectum | 60 | 39 (60.00) | 21 (55.26) | ||
Differentiation degree | 0.552 | 0.458 | |||
High differentiation | 23 | 13 (20.00) | 10 (26.32) | ||
Medium–low differentiation | 80 | 52 (80.00) | 28 (73.68) | ||
Pathological staging | 3.086 | 0.079 | |||
I–II | 48 | 26 (40.00) | 22 (57.89) | ||
III–IV | 55 | 39 (60.00) | 16 (42.11) | ||
Lymph node metastasis | 5.233 | 0.022 | |||
Positive | 58 | 44 (67.69) | 17 (44.74) | ||
Negative | 45 | 21 (32.31) | 21 (55.26) |
Table 3 Association between PTTG1 expression and clinicopathological data of patients undergoing radical surgery for colorectal carcinoma
Grouping | n | PTTG1 positive (n = 58), n (%) | PTTG1 negative (n = 45), n (%) | χ2 | P value |
Sex | 2.728 | 0.099 | |||
Male | 53 | 34 (58.62) | 19 (42.22) | ||
Female | 50 | 24 (41.38) | 26 (57.78) | ||
Age | 3.534 | 0.060 | |||
< 60 yr old | 42 | 19 (32.76) | 23 (51.11) | ||
≥ 60 yr old | 61 | 39 (67.24) | 22 (48.89) | ||
Tumor location | 2.327 | 0.127 | |||
Colon | 43 | 28 (48.28) | 15 (33.33) | ||
Rectum | 60 | 30 (51.72) | 30 (66.67) | ||
Differentiation degree | 0.867 | 0.352 | |||
High differentiation | 23 | 11 (18.97) | 12 (26.67) | ||
Low–moderate differentiation | 80 | 47 (81.03) | 33 (73.33) | ||
Pathological staging | 0.616 | 0.433 | |||
I–II | 48 | 29 (50.00) | 19 (42.22) | ||
III–IV | 55 | 29 (50.00) | 26 (57.78) | ||
Lymph node metastasis | 17.150 | < 0.001 | |||
Positive | 58 | 43 (74.14) | 15 (33.33) | ||
Negative | 45 | 15 (25.86) | 30 (66.67) |
Table 4 Receiver operating characteristic analysis of the potential of GLI1 and PTTG1 expression to indicate lymph node metastasis in patients undergoing radical surgery for colorectal carcinoma
Grouping | AUC | 95%CI | SE | Cut-off | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) |
GLI1 | 0.824 | 0.739–0.910 | 0.044 | 19.76 | 75.56 | 84.48 |
PTTG1 | 0.811 | 0.726–0.895 | 0.043 | 13.97 | 68.89 | 82.76 |
- Citation: Cao F, Chen YY, Wang HC. GLI1 and PTTG1 expression in colorectal carcinoma patients undergoing radical surgery and their correlation with lymph node metastasis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16(5): 1328-1335
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v16/i5/1328.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i5.1328