Wang L, Zhang WS, Huang GJ. Onset and prognostic features of anastomotic leakage in patients undergoing radical surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16(12): 3710-3719 [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i12.3710]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Guo-Jin Huang, MM, Doctor, Department of General Surgery, The Second Hospital of Nanjing, No. 1-1 Zhongfu Road, Gulou District, Nanjing 210009, Jiangsu Province, China. 13675188516@163.com
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastrointest Surg. Dec 27, 2024; 16(12): 3710-3719 Published online Dec 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i12.3710
Table 1 Comparison of clinical data between the incident and non-incident groups
Category
Incident group (n = 61)
Non-incident group (n = 59)
t/χ2
P value
Cases
Percentage (%)
Cases
Percentage (%)
Sex
Male
48
78.69
31
52.54
9.115
0.003
Female
13
21.31
28
47.46
Age (years)
< 55
33
54.10
38
64.41
1.319
0.251
≥ 55
28
45.90
21
35.59
Tumor distance from anal margin (cm)
< 5
29
47.54
35
59.32
1.672
0.196
≥ 5
32
52.46
24
40.68
Interval between radiotherapy and surgery (weeks)
≥ 8
15
24.59
18
30.51
0.527
0.468
< 8
46
75.41
41
69.49
Stoma creation (preventive)
Yes
27
44.26
22
37.29
0.604
0.437
No
34
55.74
37
62.71
Hand-sewn anastomosis
Yes
18
29.51
15
25.42
0.251
0.616
No
43
70.49
44
74.58
Surgery time (minute)
≥ 180
22
36.07
11
18.64
4.566
0.033
< 180
39
63.93
48
81.36
Intraoperative bleeding (mL)
≥ 150
23
37.70
11
18.64
5.366
0.021
< 150
38
62.30
48
81.36
Pelvic radiation injury
Yes
34
55.74
15
25.42
11.408
0.001
No
27
44.26
44
74.58
Smoking history
Yes
15
24.59
11
18.64
0.625
0.429
No
46
75.41
48
81.36
Alcohol history
Yes
16
26.23
13
22.03
0.288
0.591
No
45
73.77
46
77.97
Hypertension
Yes
11
18.03
15
25.42
0.965
0.326
No
50
81.97
44
74.58
Diabetes
Yes
8
13.11
9
15.25
0.113
0.737
No
53
86.89
50
84.75
Preoperative anemia
Yes
5
8.20
8
13.56
0.893
0.345
No
56
91.80
51
86.44
Preoperative hypoalbuminemia (< 35 g/L)
Yes
6
9.84
8
13.56
0.403
0.525
No
55
90.16
51
86.44
Intraoperative blood transfusion
Yes
25
40.98
13
22.03
4.977
0.026
No
36
59.02
46
77.97
Tumor center location
Below the peritoneal reflection
15
24.59
17
28.81
0.274
0.601
Above the peritoneal reflection
46
75.41
42
71.19
Differentiation degree
Moderately to well-differentiated
52
85.25
45
76.27
1.559
0.212
Poorly differentiated or undifferentiated
9
14.75
14
23.73
Table 2 Assignments
Factor
Assignment
Sex
Male = 1, female = 0
Surgery time (minute)
≥ 180 = 1, < 180 = 0
Bleeding amount (mL)
≥ 150 = 1, < 150 = 0
Pelvic radiation injury
Yes = 1, No = 0
Intraoperative blood transfusion
Yes = 1, No = 0
Table 3 Multivariate analysis for factors influencing postoperative anastomotic leakage
Factor
B
SE
Wald
P value
OR
95%CI
Lower
Upper
Sex
1.204
0.407
8.754
0.003
3.335
1.502
7.407
Surgery time
0.901
0.428
4.438
0.035
2.462
1.065
5.691
Bleeding amount
0.899
0.408
4.856
0.028
1.407
1.183
1.905
Pelvic radiation injury
1.307
0.395
10.956
0.001
3.694
1.704
8.008
Intraoperative blood transfusion
0.899
0.408
4.856
0.028
2.457
1.105
5.467
Table 4 Analysis of clinical manifestations and prognosis of patients with postoperative anastomotic leakage
Clinical feature
Cases
Percentage (%)
ISREC classification
Grade A
30
49.18
Grade B
25
40.98
Grade C
6
9.84
Fistula location
Anterior wall
9
14.75
Posterior wall
40
65.57
Lateral wall
8
13.11
Circumferential
4
6.56
Clinical manifestation
Fever
6
9.84
Abdominal pain/bloating
7
11.48
Abnormal drainage
1
1.64
Anorectal pus discharge
16
26.23
Anorectal/coccygeal pain
18
29.51
Rectal irritation sign
11
18.03
Abnormal vaginal discharge
2
3.28
Necrosis of everted bowel
2
3.28
Number of invasive interventions (times)
< 2
49
80.33
≥ 2
12
19.67
Prognosis
Chronic sacrococcygeal fistula formation
15
24.59
Anastomotic stenosis
18
29.51
Long-term stoma
12
19.67
Table 5 Univariate analysis of factors affecting poor prognosis in patients with postoperative anastomotic leakage
Factor
Favorable prognosis group (n = 27)
Unfavorable prognosis group (n = 34)
t/χ2
P value
Cases
Percentage (%)
Cases
Percentage (%)
Sex
Male
22
81.48
26
76.47
0.225
0.635
Female
5
18.52
8
23.53
Age (years)
< 55
15
55.56
18
52.94
0.041
0.839
≥ 55
12
44.44
16
47.06
Tumor distance from the anus (cm)
< 5
9
33.33
23
67.65
7.105
0.008
≥ 5
18
66.67
11
32.35
Interval between radiotherapy and surgery (weeks)
≥ 8
7
25.93
8
23.53
0.047
0.829
< 8
20
74.07
26
76.47
Prophylactic stoma
Yes
12
44.44
15
44.12
0.001
0.980
No
15
55.56
19
55.88
Hand-sewn anastomosis
Yes
9
33.33
9
26.47
0.341
0.559
No
18
66.67
25
73.53
ISREC classification
Grade A
19
70.37
11
32.35
10.468
0.005
Grade B
5
18.52
20
58.82
Grade C
3
11.11
3
8.82
Fistula location
Anterior wall
4
14.81
5
14.71
7.507
0.057
Posterior wall
14
51.85
26
76.47
Lateral wall
7
25.93
1
2.94
Circumferential
2
7.41
2
5.88
Table 6 Multivariate analysis of factors influencing poor prognosis in patients with postoperative anastomotic leakage
Factor
B
SE
Wald
P value
OR
95%CI
Lower
Upper
Distance of Tumor from the anal verge
1.431
0.549
6.800
0.009
4.182
1.427
12.258
ISREC Classification
0.890
0.436
4.167
0.041
2.435
1.036
5.723
Citation: Wang L, Zhang WS, Huang GJ. Onset and prognostic features of anastomotic leakage in patients undergoing radical surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16(12): 3710-3719