Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jul 27, 2023; 15(7): 1405-1415
Published online Jul 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i7.1405
Table 1 Comparison of clinical data
Factors
Control group (n = 45)
Observation group (n = 58)
χ2 value
P value
Age (yr)0.2870.591
≥ 652124
< 652434
Gender1.0590.303
Male2538
Female2020
BMI (kg/m2)0.0690.791
≥ 231926
< 232632
ASA classification0.1420.931
Grade I1519
Grade II2227
Grade III812
Past medical history
Hypertension25223.1730.074
Diabetes mellitus15170.1910.661
Clinical stages0.3410.558
Phase I2225
Phase II2333
Tumor diameter0.2340.628
≥ 5 cm1218
< 5 cm3340
Table 2 Comparison of Leiden-surgical rating scale scores between patients during and after skin incision
Group
Before operation
60 min
At abdominal closure after operation
Control group (n = 45)4.55 ± 0.934.46 ± 0.854.60 ± 0.53
Observation group (n = 58)4.34 ± 0.474.32 ± 0.804.48 ± 0.78
t value1.8781.2441.422
P value0.0630.2160.158
Table 3 Comparison of visual analogue scale scores between patients before and after operation
Group
8 h
24 h
48 h
Control group (n = 45)2.88 ± 1.011.48 ± 0.961.02 ± 0.63
Observation group (n = 58)2.91 ± 0.941.08 ± 0.820.75 ± 0.43
t value0.1332.2802.538
P value0.8940.0240.012
Table 4 Comparison of driving pressure between patients during operation (p/cmH2O)
Group
5 min after intubation
5 min after establishment of pneumoperitoneum
60 min after establishment of pneumoperitoneum
After recovery of the pneumoperitoneum deflation to horizontal level
Control group (n = 45)10.08 ± 2.3318.21 ± 3.8019.58 ± 4.5112.11 ± 3.71
Observation group (n = 58)10.50 ± 1.6515.12 ± 3.2016.04 ± 3.0911.59 ± 2.81
t value1.2105.1835.4150.856
P value0.229< 0.001< 0.0010.393
Table 5 Statistics of adverse post-anesthetic recovery room-associated respiratory events
Group
Upper respiratory tract obstruction
Mild to moderate hypoxia
Severe hypoxia
Respiratory distress
Total incidence rate
Control group (n = 45)333211
Observation group (n = 58)21216
χ2 value3.655
P value0.055