Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2025; 17(2): 101896
Published online Feb 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i2.101896
Published online Feb 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i2.101896
Retrospective comparative study of different surgical methods for gastric ulcer perforation: Efficacy and postoperative complications
Yu-Fan Pang, Liang Shu, Cheng-Wei Xia, Department of Thyroid Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, Sichuan Province, China
Author contributions: Pang YF and Shu L contributed to the concept of this study was jointly proposed, and participated in data collection; Pang YF drafted the initial draft; Shu L contributed to the formal analysis of this study; Pang YF and Xia CW guided the research, methodology, and visualization of the manuscript; Shu L, Pang YF, and Xia CW participated in this study and validated it; All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Institutional review board statement: This study has been reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, with the ethical review number No. XNYK-2022-052.
Informed consent statement: Consent was obtained from the patients and their guardians, and an informed consent form was signed.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Data sharing statement: No data available.
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Yu-Fan Pang, Department of Thyroid Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, No. 25 Taiping Street, Luzhou 646000, Sichuan Province, China. 1917515053@qq.com
Received: November 7, 2024
Revised: December 4, 2024
Accepted: December 17, 2024
Published online: February 27, 2025
Processing time: 76 Days and 2.2 Hours
Revised: December 4, 2024
Accepted: December 17, 2024
Published online: February 27, 2025
Processing time: 76 Days and 2.2 Hours
Core Tip
Core Tip: This study evaluated three surgical techniques for gastric ulcer perforation: Simple closure, omental patch repair, and partial gastrectomy. While all methods are effective, omental patch repair offers the best balance of efficacy, lower complication rates, and quicker recovery. These findings emphasize the importance of tailoring surgical choices according to individual patient needs and surgeon experience.