Published online May 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i5.834
Peer-review started: December 3, 2022
First decision: January 12, 2023
Revised: January 22, 2023
Accepted: March 14, 2023
Article in press: March 14, 2023
Published online: May 27, 2023
Processing time: 174 Days and 1.5 Hours
The management of high-grade pancreatic trauma is controversial.
The literature consists predominantly of studies conducted in regions such as North America and South Africa, where penetrating abdominal trauma occur with high prevalence. However, blunt abdominal trauma is more common than penetrating trauma in Australasian centres, and are underrepresented in the literature. While pancreatic injuries are estimated to occur in 20%-30% of penetrating abdominal trauma, they are observed in less than 2% of blunt trauma cases worldwide[13]. Furthermore, trauma services are not centralised in Australian healthcare settings. These regional differences are likely to have important implications for patient management and outcomes.
This study reviews the experience of an Australian tertiary referral center, with the aim of providing locally relevant insights into the management of high-grade pancreatic injuries.
A retrospective review of records was performed on all patients undergoing surgical intervention for high-grade pancreatic injuries [American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) Grade III or greater] at a single Australian centre between January 2001 and December 2022.
Over a twenty-year period, 14 patients underwent pancreatic resection for high-grade injuries. Seven patients sustained AAST Grade III injuries and 7 were classified as Grades IV or V. Nine underwent distal pancreatectomy and 5 underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Overall, there was a predominance of blunt aetiologies (11/14). Concomitant intra-abdominal injuries were observed in 11 patients and traumatic haemorrhage in 6 patients. Three patients developed clinically relevant pancreatic fistulas and there was one in-hospital mortality secondary to multi-organ failure. Among stable presentations, pancreatic ductal injuries were missed in two-thirds of cases (7/12) on initial computed tomography imaging and subsequently diagnosed on repeat imaging or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. All patients who sustained complex pancreaticoduodenal trauma underwent PD without mortality.
Penetrating and blunt trauma presentations are associated with varied patterns of injury. The management of pancreatic trauma is evolving; there is a growing role for endovascular and endoscopic techniques in the contemporary management of pancreatic trauma. Pancreatic resections including PD may be indicated and safely performed with appropriate specialist surgical, gastroenterology, and interventional radiology support in tertiary centres.
We advocate that high-grade pancreatic trauma should be managed in high-volume hepato-pancreato-biliary specialty surgical units.