Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Sep 27, 2020; 12(9): 390-396
Published online Sep 27, 2020. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v12.i9.390
Predictive significance of cancer related-inflammatory markers in locally advanced rectal cancer
Kitinat Timudom, Thawatchai Akaraviputh, Vitoon Chinswangwatanakul, Ananya Pongpaibul, Pornpim Korpraphong, Janjira Petsuksiri, Suthinee Ithimakin, Atthaphorn Trakarnsanga
Kitinat Timudom, Thawatchai Akaraviputh, Vitoon Chinswangwatanakul, Atthaphorn Trakarnsanga, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
Ananya Pongpaibul, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
Pornpim Korpraphong, Janjira Petsuksiri, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
Suthinee Ithimakin, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
Author contributions: Trakarnsanga A was involved in the conceptualization, project administration, writing review and editing; Timudom K was involved in data curation, and writing the original draft; Akaraviputh T, Pongpaibul A, Korpraphong P, Petsuksiri J, Ithimakin S and Chinswangwatanakul V were involved in writing review and editing; all authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Institutional review board statement: This study was approved by Siriraj’s institutional review board committee and the committee’s reference number is 335/2561(EC4).
Informed consent statement: All patient information is de-identified.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no competing interests
Data sharing statement: The dataset utilized during the current study is available within the institutional collected data system which was used under Siriraj’s institutional review board committee approval for this study. Data are available upon reasonable request with permission of Siriraj’s institutional review board committee.
STROBE statement: The authors have read the STROBE Statement-checklist of items, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the STROBE Statement-checklist of items.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Atthaphorn Trakarnsanga, MD, Associated Professor, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, 2 Prannok, Bangkoknoi, Bangkok 10700, Thailand. atthaphorn.tra@mahidol.ac.th
Received: February 27, 2020
Peer-review started: February 27, 2020
First decision: April 22, 2020
Revised: May 11, 2020
Accepted: August 16, 2020
Article in press: August 16, 2020
Published online: September 27, 2020
ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS
Research background

The systemic inflammatory response is increased in cancer. The level of the systemic inflammatory response is indicated by the concentration of C-reactive protein or the Glasgow prognostic score. However, these laboratory markers are not routinely measured. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), the monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) from the complete blood count are prognostic for various cancers.

Research motivation

The NLR, MLR and PLR are associated with poor oncological outcomes in rectal cancer. However, the predictive role of these markers in patients receiving preoperative chemoradiation is inconclusive.

Research objectives

We evaluated the predictive roles of pretreatment NLR, MLR, and PLR in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

Research methods

The records of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgical resection at Siriraj Hospital between 2012 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The associations between posttreatment pathological stages, neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score and the pretreatment ratios of markers of inflammation (NLR, MLR, and PLR) were analyzed.

Research results

Among 111 patients, the clinical stages determined using computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or both were as follows: T4 (n = 16), T3 (n = 94), and T2 (n = 1). The frequency of clinically positive lymph nodes was 14.4%. The NAR scores were categorized as high (> 8) in 23.4%, intermediate (8–16) in 41.4%, and low (< 8) in 35.2%. The mean values of the NLR of pathological stages 0, 1, 2, and 3 were 2.36, 2.42, 2.83 and 3.07, respectively (P = 0.40) (Figure 1). The mean values of the MLR of pathological stages 0, 1, 2 and 3 were 0.24, 0.27, 0.28, and 0.36, respectively (P = 0.18). The mean values of the PLR of pathological stages 0, 1, 2, and 3 were 10.15, 13.27, 14.20 and 15.56, respectively (P = 0.54). The mean values of the NLR were 2.52, 2.61, and 3.08 for low, intermediate, and high NAR scores, respectively (P = 0.58). The mean values of the MLR were 0.25, 0.27, and 0.37, respectively (P = 0.32). The mean values of the PLR were 11.40, 13.20, and 16.00, respectively (P = 0.61).

Research conclusions

The pretreatment NLR, MLR, and PLR of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision were higher in patients with advanced pathological stages, although the differences were not statistically significant.

Research perspectives

This study demonstrated the association between higher numbers of pretreatment inflammatory markers and higher advanced stages. Furthermore, higher numbers of pretreatment NLR, MLR, and PLR were associated with poorer response to neadjuvant chemoradiation (high NAR score). Unfortunately, this is a retrospective analysis of a small number of patients at a single center. Therefore, there were no statistically significant results. Further studies of larger populations are required to evaluate the significance of these inflammatory markers in predicting the response.