Scientometrics
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jan 27, 2025; 17(1): 100291
Published online Jan 27, 2025. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i1.100291
Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: A bibliometric method applied to the top one hundred cited articles
Jia-Jie Feng, Yi-Wen Zhao, Hong-Yin Liang, Ke-Xin Jiang, Rui-Wu Dai
Jia-Jie Feng, Yi-Wen Zhao, Hong-Yin Liang, Rui-Wu Dai, General Surgery Center, General Hospital of Western Theater Command, Chengdu 610000, Sichuan Province, China
Ke-Xin Jiang, Rui-Wu Dai, College of Medicine, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610000, Sichuan Province, China
Co-first authors: Jia-Jie Feng and Yi-Wen Zhao.
Author contributions: Feng JJ and Zhao YW conceived and designed the study, and drafted the manuscript; Feng JJ, Zhao YW, Liang HY, and Jiang KX participated in literature search and data organization; Liang HY and Jiang KX contributed to data visualization and interpretation; Dai RW supervised the review of the study. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript. Feng JJ and Zhao YW contributed equally to this work as co-first authors. The reasons for designating Feng JJ and Zhao YW as co-first authors are threefold. First, they played pivotal roles in the key stages of the study, jointly bearing the primary responsibility for everything from study design to manuscript writing, ensuring the high quality of the research. Second, both researchers demonstrated exceptional collaboration and coordination skills throughout the research process, which facilitated the smooth progression of the study and timely resolution of critical issues. Finally, their respective expertise and skills were fully utilized in the research, and their contributions were inseparable. This complementarity laid the foundation for the success of the research outcomes. Therefore, we believe that designating Feng JJ and Zhao YW as co-first authors of our manuscript is both appropriate and necessary, as it not only reflects their equal contributions but also embodies the spirit of teamwork.
Supported by the Project of the Hospital Management of the General Hospital of Western Theater Command, No. 2024-YGLC-A01.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
PRISMA 2009 Checklist statement: The authors have read the PRISMA 2009 Checklist, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the PRISMA 2009 Checklist.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Rui-Wu Dai, MD, Chief Doctor, General Surgery Center, General Hospital of Western Theater Command, No. 270 Rongdu Road, Jinniu District, Chengdu 610000, Sichuan Province, China. dairuiwu@swjtu.edu.cn
Received: August 12, 2024
Revised: September 28, 2024
Accepted: October 24, 2024
Published online: January 27, 2025
Processing time: 136 Days and 21.6 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) is considered one of the most complex procedures in general surgery. The number of articles on MIPD has been increasing annually. However, published reports often have complex research directions, and the focal points frequently change. Therefore, a comprehensive review and organization of the literature in this field is necessary.

AIM

To summarize current research, predict future hotspots and trends, and provide insights for MIPD development.

METHODS

To conduct the study, the Web of Science Core Collection was searched for relevant articles. The analysis focused on the top 100 articles in the field. Two widely used bibliometric tools, CiteSpace and VOSviewer, were used to examine various aspects, including research directions, authors, countries, institutions, journals, and keywords.

RESULTS

The top 100 articles were published between 2005 and 2022, with the majority originating from the United States (n = 51). Among the contributing institutions, Pancreas Center of the University of Chicago and the Health System of the University of Chicago had the highest number of publications (n = 17). In terms of individual authors, “Zeh HJ” and “Zureikat AH” led with 13 articles each. The high-frequency keywords in the literature encompassed three main areas: Surgical modality, perioperative outcomes, and the learning curve. These keywords were further categorized into seven primary clusters, with the largest being “laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy”.

CONCLUSION

The most influential studies predominantly originate from the United States, and there is growing interest in robotic surgery. Despite MIPD’s potential benefits, further research is required to address technical challenges and improve outcomes.

Keywords: Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy; Laparoscopic surgery; Robotic surgery; Bibliometric analysis; Citation analysis

Core Tip: This study presents a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of highly cited literature in the realm of minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy. It elucidates the evolution of research trends, particularly emphasizing the rise of robotic surgical techniques and their gradual dominance over traditional laparoscopic approaches. Additionally, the analysis highlights the preeminent role of the United States in this field and identifies key research hotspots, including surgical modalities, perioperative outcomes, and learning curves. Despite considerable advancements, further investigation is warranted to address technical challenges and enhance patient outcomes in the future.