Published online Jun 27, 2024. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i6.1681
Revised: April 9, 2024
Accepted: April 26, 2024
Published online: June 27, 2024
Processing time: 131 Days and 1 Hours
The Da Vinci robot-assisted surgery technique has been widely used in laparoscopic mesangectomy for rectal cancer. However, the short-term efficacy of these procedures compared to traditional laparoscopic surgery remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare and analyze the short- and medium-term efficacy of Da Vinci robot and laparoscopic surgery in total mesangectomy (TME) for rectal cancer, so as to provide guidance and reference for clinical practice.
To investigate the safety and long-term efficacy of robotic and laparoscopic total mesorectal resection for the treatment of rectal cancer.
The clinicopathologic data of 240 patients who underwent TME for rectal cancer in the Anorectal Department of People’s Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region from August 2018 to March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 112 patients underwent laparoscopic TME (L-TME) group, and 128 patients underwent robotic TME (R-TME) group. The intraoperative, postoperative, and follow-up conditions of the two groups were compared.
The conversion rate of the L-TME group was greater than that of the R-TME group (5.4% vs 0.8%, χ2 = 4.417, P = 0.036). The complication rate of the L-TME group was greater than that of the R-TME group (32.1% vs 17.2%, χ2 = 7.290, P = 0.007). The percentage of positive annular margins in the L-TME group was greater than that in the R-TME group (7.1% vs 1.6%, χ2 = 4.658, P = 0.031). The 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate and overall survival (OS) rate of the L-TME group were lower than those of the R-TME group (74.1% vs 85.2%, χ2 = 4.962, P = 0.026; 81.3% vs 91.4%, χ2 = 5.494, P = 0.019); in patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage III DFS rate and OS rate in the L-TME group were significantly lower than those in the R-TME group (52.5% vs 76.1%, χ2 = 5.799, P = 0.016; 65.0% vs 84.8%, χ2 = 4.787, P = 0.029).
Compared with the L-TME group, the R-TME group had a better tumor prognosis and was more favorable for patients with rectal cancer, especially for patients with stage III rectal cancer.
Core Tip: This study compared the short- and medium-term efficacy of Da Vinci robot-assisted surgery with traditional laparoscopic surgery in total mesangectomy for rectal cancer, involving indexes such as operation time, postoperative complications, postoperative pain, and postoperative rehabilitation. By comparing and analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of the two surgical methods, the influence on the treatment effect and quality of life of the patients was evaluated, and the scientific basis for clinical decision-making was provided.