Published online Apr 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i4.634
Peer-review started: December 19, 2022
First decision: January 9, 2023
Revised: January 24, 2023
Accepted: March 23, 2023
Article in press: March 23, 2023
Published online: April 27, 2023
Processing time: 124 Days and 20.6 Hours
Hypersplenism and esophageal varices bleeding are the major complications of portal hypertension (PHT). In recent years, increasing attention has been given to spleen preservation operations. The mode and long-term effects of subtotal splenectomy and selective pericardial devascularization for PHT remain controversial.
To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of subtotal splenectomy combined with selective pericardial devascularization for the treatment of PHT.
This was a retrospective study of 15 patients with PHT who underwent subtotal splenectomy not preserving the splenic artery or vein combined with selective pericardial devascularization in the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University from February 2011 to April 2022. Fifteen propensity score-matched patients with PHT who underwent total splenectomy at the same time served as the control group. The patients were followed for up to 11 years after surgery. We compared the postoperative platelet levels, perioperative splenic vein thrombosis, and serum immunoglobulin levels between the two groups. Abdominal enhanced computed tomography was used to evaluate the blood supply and function of the residual spleen. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, evacuation time, and hospital stay were compared between the two groups.
The postoperative platelet level of patients in the subtotal splenectomy group was significantly lower than that in the total splenectomy group (P < 0.05), and the postoperative portal system thrombosis rate in the subtotal splenectomy group was also much lower than that in the total splenectomy group. The levels of serum immunoglobulins (IgG, IgA, and IgM) showed no significant differences after surgery compared with before surgery in the subtotal splenectomy group (P > 0.05), but serum immunoglobulin IgG and IgM levels decreased dramatically after total splenectomy (P < 0.05). The operation time in the subtotal splenectomy group was longer than that in the total splenectomy group (P < 0.05), but there were no significant differences in the amount of intraoperative blood loss, evacuation time, or hospital stay between the two groups.
Subtotal splenectomy not preserving the splenic artery or vein combined with selective pericardial devascularization is a safe and effective surgical treatment for patients with PHT, not only correcting hypersplenism but also preserving splenic function, especially immunological function.
Core Tip: Partial spleen resection is beneficial for benign lesions in normal spleens. However, many issues regarding subtotal spleen resection for portal hypertension remain elusive. We performed subtotal spleen resection in situ without preserving the splenic artery and vein for portal hypertension and evaluated perioperative complications and clinical effects retrospectively. Follow-up results showed that subtotal splenectomy is a safe and effective surgical treatment for patients with portal hypertension, not only correcting hypersplenism but also preserving splenic function.