Published online Nov 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i11.2619
Peer-review started: June 13, 2023
First decision: July 6, 2023
Revised: August 3, 2023
Accepted: August 28, 2023
Article in press: August 28, 2023
Published online: November 27, 2023
Processing time: 166 Days and 17 Hours
Rectal sparing is an option for some rectal cancers with complete or good response after chemoradiotherapy (CRT); however, it has never been evaluated in patients with metastases. We assessed long-term outcomes of a rectal-sparing approach in a liver-first strategy for patients with rectal cancer with resectable liver metastases.
We examined patients who underwent an organ-sparing approach for rectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases using a liver-first strategy during 2010-2015 (n = 8). Patients received primary chemotherapy and pelvic CRT. Liver surgery was performed during the interval between CRT completion and rectal tumor re-evaluation. Clinical and oncological characteristics and long-term outcomes were assessed.
All patients underwent liver metastatic resection with curative intent. The R0 rate was 100%. Six and two patients underwent local excision and a watch-and-wait (WW) approach, respectively. All patients had T3N1 tumors at diagnosis and had good clinical response after CRT. The median survival time was 60 (range, 14-127) mo. Three patients were disease free for 5, 8, and 10 years after the procedure. Five patients developed metastatic recurrence in the liver (n = 5) and/or lungs (n = 2). Only one patient developed local recurrence concurrent with metastatic recurrence 24 mo after the WW approach. Two patients died during follow-up.
The results suggest good local control in patients undergoing organ-sparing strategies for rectal cancer with synchronous liver metastasis. Prospective trials are required to validate these data and identify good candidates for these strategies.
Core Tip: Our liver first strategy allows long course randomized controlled trial achievement without compromising systemic treatment. In case of good response after chemoradiotherapy, rectal sparing has never been evaluated in patients with metastases. Rectal sparing strategy results in low morbidity and improved patient’s long-term quality of life. With a follow-up more than 5 years, we described a good local control in 8 patients with metastases. Prospective trials are required to validate these data and identify good candidates for these strategies.