Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jan 27, 2023; 15(1): 60-71
Published online Jan 27, 2023. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i1.60
New perspectives on robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: An analysis of the National Cancer Database
Aleksandr Kalabin, Vishnu R Mani, Robin L Kruse, Chase Schlesselman, Kai Yu Li, Kevin F Staveley-O'Carroll, Eric T Kimchi
Aleksandr Kalabin, Robin L Kruse, Chase Schlesselman, Kai Yu Li, Kevin F Staveley-O'Carroll, Eric T Kimchi, Department of Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65212, United States
Vishnu R Mani, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States
Author contributions: Kalabin A and Mani VR contributed to formulation of research goals and aims, development of study design, data accrual/interpretation, data analysis, original draft preparation, manuscript review and editing; Kruse RL contributed to data analysis, implementation of the statistical software/supportive algorithms, study validation/visualization, original draft preparation and editing; Schlesselman C contributed to data analysis, implementation of the statistical software/supporting algorithms, original draft preparation, manuscript review and editing; Li KY contributed to implementation of the statistical software/supporting algorithms, original draft preparation, manuscript review and editing; Staveley-O'Carroll KF contributed to management and coordination of the project, supervision of the research activity and execution, manuscript review and editing, critical review; Kimchi ET contributed to management and coordination of the project, supervision of the research activity and execution, manuscript review and editing, critical review; All authors have read and approve the final manuscript.
Institutional review board statement: As we used only publicly available, anonymized data that precludes reidentification of participants, our study was exempt from Institutional Review Board review.
Informed consent statement: Not applicable, as we used only publicly available, anonymized data that precludes reidentification of participants.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no competing interests as well as no financial relationship to disclose.
Data sharing statement: The datasets and/or analyzed data during the current study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
STROBE statement: The authors have read the STROBE Statement - checklist of items, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the STROBE Statement-checklist of items.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Aleksandr Kalabin, MD, Surgeon, Department of Surgery, University of Missouri, No. 1 Hospital Drive, Columbia, MO 65212, United States. kalabin.al@gmail.com
Received: July 11, 2022
Peer-review started: July 11, 2022
First decision: November 18, 2022
Revised: November 23, 2022
Accepted: December 23, 2022
Article in press: December 23, 2022
Published online: January 27, 2023
Abstract
BACKGROUND

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is a common malignancy. Despite all advancements, the prognosis remains, poor with an overall 5-year survival of only 10.8%. Recently, a robotic platform has become an attractive tool for treating pancreatic cancer (PC). While recent studies indicated improved lymph node (LN) harvest during robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), data on long-term outcomes are insufficient.

AIM

To evaluate absolute LN harvest during PD. Secondary outcomes included evaluating the association between LN harvest and short- and long-term oncological outcomes for three different surgical approaches.

METHODS

We conducted an analysis of the National Cancer Database, including patients diagnosed with PC who underwent open, laparoscopic, or robotic PD in 2010-2018. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare continuous variables, chi-square test - for categorical. Overall survival was defined as the time between surgery and death. Median survival time was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method, and groups were compared with the Wilcoxon test. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the association of covariates with survival after controlling for patient characteristics and procedure type.

RESULTS

17169 patients were included, 8859 (52%) males; mean age 65; 14509 (85%) white. 13816 (80.5%) patients had an open PD, 2677 (15.6%) and 676 (3.9%) - laparoscopic and robotic PD respectively. Mean comorbidity index (Charlson-Deyo Score) 0.50. On average, 18.84 LNs were harvested. Mean LN harvest during open, laparoscopic and robotic PD was 18.59, 19.65 and 20.70 respectively (P < 0.001). On average 2.49 LNs were positive for cancer and did not differ by the procedure type (P = 0.26). Vascular invasion was noted in 42.6% of LNs and did differ by the approach: 42.1% for open, 44.0% for laparoscopic and 47.2% for robotic PD (P = 0.015). Median survival for open PD was 26.1 mo, laparoscopic - 27.2 mo, robotic - 29.1 mo (P = 0.064). Survival was associated with higher LN harvest, while higher number of positive LNs was associated with higher mortality.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that robotic PD is associated with increased intraoperative LN harvest and has comparable short-term oncological outcomes and survival compared to open and laparoscopic approaches.

Keywords: Pancreatic cancer, Pancreaticoduodenectomy, Robotic surgery, National Cancer Database

Core Tip: This retrospective study evaluated absolute lymph node (LN) harvest during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for analyzed over 17000 patients who underwent PD from 2010 to 2018. The number of LN harvested differed by the procedure type (open, laparoscopic, robotic), with the highest harvest obtained with the robotic approach. Procedure type was not associated with mortality or readmission rate within 30 d of hospital discharge. However, an increasing number of LN harvested was associated with survival, while a higher number of LN that were positive for cancer was associated with earlier mortality on multivariate analysis. Our study suggests that robotic PD has better LN harvest and is comparable to open and laparoscopic approaches for short-term oncological outcomes and survival.