Published online Aug 27, 2022. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i8.821
Peer-review started: April 22, 2022
First decision: June 19, 2022
Revised: June 28, 2022
Accepted: July 26, 2022
Article in press: July 26, 2022
Published online: August 27, 2022
Processing time: 124 Days and 3.7 Hours
Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a severe complication in rectal cancer surgery. Various methods, including intracorporeal reinforcing suturing, have been used to reduce the incidence of AL. However, little is known about the efficacy of staple-line reinforcement by barbed suture for preventing AL.
To evaluate the efficacy of staple-line reinforcement using barbed suture for preventing AL in laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.
We retrospectively reviewed the clinical datum of 319 patients undergoing laparoscopic low anterior resection combined with double stapling technique between May 1, 2017 and January 31, 2021. All surgeries were performed by the same surgical team specializing in colorectal surgery. Patients were divided into two groups depending on whether they received reinforcing sutures. Patients’ baseline characteristics did not show any significant difference between the two groups. We analyzed patient-, tumor-, as well as surgery-related variables using univariate and multivariate logistic analyses.
There were 168 patients in the reinforcing suture group and 151 patients in the non-reinforcing suture group. AL occurred in 25 cases (7.8%). Its incidence was significantly higher in the non-reinforcing suture group than in the reinforcing suture group (4.8% vs 11.3%, P = 0.031). The multivariate analyses demonstrated that the tumor site, tumor size and presence of staple-line reinforcement were independent risk factors for AL. We divided these patients into two risk groups based on the combination of tumor site and tumor size. Patients without any risk factor were assigned to the low-risk group (n = 177), whereas those having one or two risk factors were assigned to the high-risk group (n = 142). In the high-risk group, the AL incidence considerably decreased in the reinforcing suture group compared with that in the non-reinforcing suture group (P = 0.038). Nonetheless, no significant difference was found in the low-risk group between the two groups.
Staple-line reinforcement by barbed suture may decrease the incidence of AL. A large-scale prospective randomized controlled trial is needed for evaluating the efficacy of staple-line reinforcement for preventing AL.
Core Tip: Double stapling technique (DST) has been extensively applied in rectal surgery. However, the drawbacks of DST cannot be ignored, particularly because the linear cutter application as the distal rectum incision is not completely matched with a circular incision in the proximal intestinal tract. This leads to crossing at least two staple lines, which is referred as the “dog ear” structure. Some studies have reported that such intersection induced the vulnerable area causing anastomotic leakage (AL). This study was aimed to investigate the efficacy of reinforcing anastomosis with barbed suture in preventing AL after laparoscopic DST, and evaluate its feasibility and safety.