Deep learning-based radiomics techniques have the potential to aid specialists and physicians in performing decision-making in COVID-19 scenarios. Specifically, a Deep Learning (DL) ensemble model is employed to classify medical images when addressing the diagnosis during the classification tasks for COVID-19 using chest X-ray images. It also provides feasible and reliable visual explicability concerning the results to support decision-making.

Our DEELE-Rad approach integrates DL and Machine Learning (ML) techniques. We use deep learning models to extract deep radiomics features and evaluate its performance regarding end-to-end classifiers. We avoid successive radiomics approach steps by employing these models with transfer learning techniques from ImageNet, such as VGG16, ResNet50V2, and DenseNet201 architectures. We extract 100 and 500 deep radiomics features from each DL model. We also placed these features into well-established ML classifiers and applied automatic parameter tuning and a cross-validation strategy. Besides, we exploit insights into the decision-making behavior by applying a visual explanation method.

Experimental evaluation on our proposed approach achieved 89.97% AUC when using 500 deep radiomics features from the DenseNet201 end-to-end classifier. Besides, our ensemble DEELE-Rad method improves the results up to 96.19% AUC for the 500 dimensions. To outperform, ML DEELE-Rad reached the best results with an Accuracy of 98.39% and 99.19% AUC for the same setup. Our visual assessment employs additional possibilities for specialists and physicians to decision-making.

The results reflect that the DEELE-Rad approach provides robustness and confidence to the images' analysis. Our approach can benefit healthcare specialists when employed at clinical routines and respective decision-making procedures. For reproducibility, our code is available at https://github.com/usmarcv/deele-rad.

Radiomics is a health technology that has the potential to extract clinically meaningful biomarkers from standard of care imaging. Despite a wealth of exploratory analysis performed on scans acquired from patients with lung cancer and existing guidelines describing some of the key steps, no radiomic-based biomarker has been widely accepted. This is primarily due to limitations with methodology, data analysis, and interpretation of the available studies. There is currently a lack of guidance relating to the entire radiomic workflow from study design to critical appraisal. This guide, written with early career lung cancer researchers, describes a more complete radiomic workflow. Lung cancer image analysis is the focus due to some of the unique challenges encountered such as patient movement from breathing. The guide will focus on CT imaging as these are the most common scans performed on patients with lung cancer. The aim of this article is to support the production of high-quality research that has the potential to positively impact outcome of patients with lung cancer.

Given the enormous output and pace of development of artificial intelligence (AI) methods in medical imaging, it can be challenging to identify the true success stories to determine the state-of-the-art of the field. This report seeks to provide the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) community with an initial guide into the major areas in which the methods of AI are contributing to MRI in oncology. After a general introduction to artificial intelligence, we proceed to discuss the successes and current limitations of AI in MRI when used for image acquisition, reconstruction, registration, and segmentation, as well as its utility for assisting in diagnostic and prognostic settings. Within each section, we attempt to present a balanced summary by first presenting common techniques, state of readiness, current clinical needs, and barriers to practical deployment in the clinical setting. We conclude by presenting areas in which new advances must be realized to address questions regarding generalizability, quality assurance and control, and uncertainty quantification when applying MRI to cancer to maintain patient safety and practical utility.

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ChatGPT-4o in assessing the methodological quality of radiomics research using the radiomics quality score (RQS) compared to human experts.

Published in European Radiology, European Radiology Experimental, and Insights into Imaging between 2023 and 2024, open-access and peer-reviewed radiomics research articles with creative commons attribution license (CC-BY) were included in this study. Pre-prints from MedRxiv were also included to evaluate potential peer-review bias. Using the RQS, each study was independently assessed twice by ChatGPT-4o and by two radiologists with consensus.

In total, 52 open-access and peer-reviewed articles were included in this study. Both ChatGPT-4o evaluation (average of two readings) and human experts had a median RQS of 14.5 (40.3% percentage score) (p > 0.05). Pairwise comparisons revealed no statistically significant difference between the readings of ChatGPT and human experts (corrected p > 0.05). The intraclass correlation coefficient for intra-rater reliability of ChatGPT-4o was 0.905 (95% CI: 0.840-0.944), and those for inter-rater reliability with human experts for each evaluation of ChatGPT-4o were 0.859 (95% CI: 0.756-0.919) and 0.914 (95% CI: 0.855-0.949), corresponding to good to excellent reliability for all. The evaluation by ChatGPT-4o took less time (2.9-3.5 min per article) compared to human experts (13.9 min per article by one reader). Item-wise reliability analysis showed ChatGPT-4o maintained consistently high reliability across almost all RQS items.

ChatGPT-4o provides reliable and efficient assessments of radiomics research quality. Its evaluations closely align with those of human experts and reduce evaluation time.

Question Is ChatGPT effective and reliable in evaluating radiomics research quality based on RQS? Findings ChatGPT-4o showed high reliability and efficiency, with evaluations closely matching human experts. It can considerably reduce the time required for radiomics research quality assessment. Clinical relevance ChatGPT-4o offers a quick and reliable automated alternative for evaluating the quality of radiomics research, with the potential to assess radiomics research at a large scale in the future.

Biochemical recurrence (BCR) following prostate cancer (PCa) treatment is a significant indicator of metastasis and mortality. Early prediction of BCR can guide treatment decisions, and optimize patient management strategies. MRI is essential for the diagnosis and surveillance of PCa. This study aimed to assess the accuracy and quality of MRI radiomics-based machine learning (ML) models for predicting post-treatment BCR in PCa.

A systematic literature search was conducted across five electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and IEEE) up to December 23, 2024, to identify studies developing ML models based on MRI-derived radiomics features for the prediction of BCR in PCa. Studies were assessed for quality using the QUADAS-2 and METRICS tools. A meta-analysis of radiomics, clinical, and clinical-radiomics models in validation cohorts was performed to pool sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) using a bivariate random-effects model.

A total of 24 studies were incorporated into the systematic review, with 14 included in the meta-analysis. The pooled AUC, sensitivity, and specificity for radiomics-based ML models were 0.75, 72%, and 78%, respectively. Clinical-radiomics models showed the highest performance with a pooled AUC of 0.88, sensitivity of 85%, and specificity of 79%. QUADAS-2 revealed significant methodological biases, particularly in the index test and flow and timing domains. The mean METRICS score across studies was 65.68%, ranging from 43.8 to 82.2%, showing overall good quality but highlighting methodological gaps in some domains.

MRI-based radiomics demonstrates potential for predicting BCR in PCa, especially when integrated with clinical variables. However, it is still far from widespread clinical use, necessitating further standardization and key methodological improvements for better generalizability and robustness. Future studies should adopt multi-center designs and conduct thorough external validation to enhance applicability across diverse patient populations.

BackgroundHydronephrosis, particularly attributed to the presence of renal calculi, is a clinical condition that can result in permanent renal injury, necessitating the utilization of imaging modalities for accurate diagnosis. Methodologies that can swiftly aid the radiologist by reducing workload are required for the preliminary diagnosis of hydronephrosis, which is critical in clinical practice.PurposeTo examine the efficacy of autosegmentation-assisted radiomics in predicting the presence of hydronephrosis among individuals diagnosed with renal colic.Material and MethodsThe study comprised 268 individuals who had non-contrast computed tomography (CT) scans presenting unilateral hydronephrosis. After the 3D autosegmentation of each patient's kidneys, first- and second-order radiomics parameters were acquired and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator was employed as the dimensionality reduction tool. Machine learning (ML) procedures consisted of Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest Classifier (RFC) analysis, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Decision Tree Analysis.ResultsNo statistically significant difference was observed between the groups when comparing the side of hydronephrosis and the distribution of age among sexes. The repeated measurements of 3D autosegmentation exhibited a high level of intra-observer agreement. SVM, RFC, XGBoost, and Decision Tree analyses were able to predict the presence of hydronephrosis with AUC values of 0.966, 0.925, 0.994, and 0.978, respectively.ConclusionML-assisted radiomics can be considered an effective tool for accurately predicting the presence of hydronephrosis.

To create a placental radiomics-clinical machine learning model to predict FGR.

Retrospectively analyzed placental MRI and clinical data of 110 FGR cases and 158 healthy controls at 28-37 weeks of gestation from two campuses of ZWH. 227 cases from Hubin campus were randomly divided into training (n = 182) and internal testing set (n = 45). 41 cases from Xiaoshan campus were included in external testing set. Placental MRI features were extracted from sagittal T2WI. Mann-Whitney U test, redundancy analysis, and LASSO were used to identify the radiomics signature, and the best-performing radiomics model was constructed by comparing eight machine learning algorithms. Clinical factors determined by univariate and multivariate analyses. A united model and nomogram combining the radiomics Rad-score and clinical factors were established. The performance of the models was assessed by DeLong test, calibration curve and decision curve analysis.

Of 1561 radiomics features, 10 strongly correlated with FGR were selected. The radiomics model using logistic regression performed best compared eight algorithms. 5 important clinical features identified by analysis. The united model demonstrated a good predictive performance in the training, internal testing and external testing sets, with AUC 0.941 (95% CI, 0.0.904-0.977), 0.899 (95% CI, 0.789-1) and 0.861 (95% CI 0.725-0.998), prediction accuracies 0.885, 0.844 and 0.805, precisions 0.871, 0.789 and 0.867, recalls 0.836, 0.833 and 0.684, and F1 scores 0.853, 0.811 and 0.765, respectively. The calibration and decision curves of the united model also showed good performance. Nomogram confirmed clinical applicability of the model.

The proposed placental radiomics-clinical machine learning model is simple yet effective to predict FGR.

The assessment of neoadjuvant treatment's response is critical for selecting the most suitable therapeutic options for patients with breast cancer to reduce the need for invasive local therapies. Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is so far one of the most accurate approaches for assessing pathological complete response, although this is limited by the qualitative and subjective nature of radiologists' assessment, often making it insufficient for deciding whether to forgo additional locoregional therapy measures. To increase the accuracy and prediction of radiomic MRI with the aid of machine learning models and deep learning methods, as part of artificial intelligence, have been used to analyse the different subtypes of breast cancer and the specific changes observed before and after therapy. This review discusses recent advancements in radiomic MRI models for presurgical response assessment for patients with early breast cancer receiving preoperative treatments, with a focus on their implications for clinical practice.

Rapid, accurate preoperative imaging diagnostics of appendicitis are critical in surgical decisions of emergency care. This study developed a fully automated diagnostic framework using a 3D convolutional neural network (CNN) to identify appendicitis and clinical information from patients with abdominal pain, including contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic computed tomography images. A deep learning model-Information of Appendix (IA)-was developed, and the volume of interest (VOI) region corresponding to the anatomical location of the appendix was automatically extracted. It was analysed using a two-stage binary algorithm with transfer learning. The algorithm predicted three categories: non-, simple, and complicated appendicitis. The 3D-CNN architecture incorporated ResNet, DenseNet, and EfficientNet. The IA model utilising DenseNet169 demonstrated 79.5% accuracy (76.4-82.6%), 70.1% sensitivity (64.7-75.0%), 87.6% specificity (83.7-90.7%), and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.865 (0.862-0.867), with a negative appendectomy rate of 12.4% in stage 1 classification identifying non-appendicitis versus. appendicitis. In stage 2, the IA model exhibited 76.1% accuracy (70.3-81.9%), 82.6% sensitivity (62.9-90.9%), 74.2% specificity (67.0-80.3%), and an AUC of 0.827 (0.820-0.833), differentiating simple and complicated appendicitis. This IA model can provide physicians with reliable diagnostic information on appendicitis with generality and reproducibility within the VOI.

Imaging genomics is a burgeoning field that seeks to connections between medical imaging and genomic features. It has been widely applied to explore heterogeneity and predict responsiveness and disease progression in cancer. This review aims to assess current applications and advancements of imaging genomics in cancer.

Literature on imaging genomics in cancer was retrieved and selected from PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase before July 2024. Detail information of articles, such as systems and imaging features, were extracted and analyzed. Citation information was extracted from Web of Science and Scopus. Additionally, a bibliometric analysis of the included studies was conducted using the Bibliometrix R package and VOSviewer.

A total of 370 articles were included in the study. The annual growth rate of articles on imaging genomics in cancer is 24.88%. China (133) and the USA (107) were the most productive countries. The top 2 keywords plus were "survival" and "classification". The current research mainly focuses on the central nervous system (121) and the genitourinary system (110, including 44 breast cancer articles). Despite different systems utilizing different imaging modalities, more than half of the studies in each system employed radiomics features.

Publication databases provide data support for imaging genomics research. The development of artificial intelligence algorithms, especially in feature extraction and model construction, has significantly advanced this field. It is conducive to enhancing the related-models' interpretability. Nonetheless, challenges such as the sample size and the standardization of feature extraction and model construction must overcome. And the research trends revealed in this study will guide the development of imaging genomics in the future and contribute to more accurate cancer diagnosis and treatment in the clinic.

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of large language models (LLM) in assessing the methodological quality of radiomics research, using METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS) tool.

This study included open access radiomic research articles published in 2024 across various journals and a preprint repository, all under the Creative Commons Attribution License. Each study was independently evaluated using METRICS by two LLMs, ChatGPT-4 and NotebookLM, and a consensus assessment performed by two radiologists with expertise in radiomics research.

A total of 48 open access articles were included in this study. ChatGPT-4, NotebookLM, and human readers achieved median scores of 79.5 %, 61.6 %, and 69.0 %, respectively, with a statistically significant difference across these evaluations (p < 0.05). Pairwise comparisons indicated no statistically significant difference for NotebookLM vs human experts (p > 0.05), in contrast to other pairs (p < 0.05). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for ChatGPT-4 and human experts was 0.563 (95 % CI: 0.050---0.795), corresponding to poor to good agreement. The ICC for ChatGPT-4 and NotebookLM and for human experts and NotebookLM were 0.391 (95 % CI: -0.031---0.665) and 0.555 (95 % CI: 0.326---0.723), respectively, indicating poor to moderate agreement. LLMs completed the tasks in a significantly shorter time (p < 0.05). In item-wise reliability analysis, ChatGPT-4 generally demonstrated higher consistency than NotebookLM.

LLMs hold promise for automatically evaluating the quality of radiomics research using METRICS, a new tool that is relatively more complex yet comprehensive compared to its counterparts. However, substantial improvements are needed for full alignment with human experts.

Artificial intelligence now encompasses technologies like machine learning, natural language processing, and robotics, allowing machines to undertake complex tasks traditionally done by humans. AI's application in healthcare has led to advancements in diagnostic tools, predictive analytics, and surgical precision.

This comprehensive review aims to explore the transformative impact of AI across diverse healthcare domains, highlighting its applications, advancements, challenges, and contributions to enhancing patient care.

A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, covering publications from 2014 to 2024. Keywords related to AI applications in healthcare were used to gather data, focusing on studies exploring AI's role in medical specialties.

AI has demonstrated substantial benefits across various fields of medicine. In cardiology, it aids in automated image interpretation, risk prediction, and the management of cardiovascular diseases. In oncology, AI enhances cancer detection, treatment planning, and personalized drug selection. Radiology benefits from improved image analysis and diagnostic accuracy, while critical care sees advancements in patient triage and resource optimization. AI's integration into pediatrics, surgery, public health, neurology, pathology, and mental health has similarly shown significant improvements in diagnostic precision, personalized treatment, and overall patient care. The implementation of AI in low-resource settings has been particularly impactful, enhancing access to advanced diagnostic tools and treatments.

AI is rapidly changing the healthcare industry by greatly increasing the accuracy of diagnoses, streamlining treatment plans, and improving patient outcomes across a variety of medical specializations. This review underscores AI's transformative potential, from early disease detection to personalized treatment plans, and its ability to augment healthcare delivery, particularly in resource-limited settings.

To develop a model integrating multiparametric MRI and clinical data to distinguish idiopathic granulomatous mastitis (IGM) from invasive breast cancer (IBC) and assess its potential to improve clinical decision-making in ambiguous cases.

A retrospective study was conducted on 255 female patients (135 with IGM and 120 with IBC) from two hospitals, divided into training (n = 161), internal validation (n = 41), and external validation (n = 53) cohorts. All patients underwent multiparametric MRI (including DCE and DWI) within two weeks prior to histopathological exam. Multiparametric MRI-based radiomics and clinical features were extracted and then selected using a two-staged method. The logistic regression was applied to construct DCE-model, DWI-model, Fusion_rad-model and Fusion_rad + cli-model. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The model' ability to assist radiologists in differential diagnosis was also analyzed.

The Fusion_rad + cli-model achieved the highest diagnostic performance with AUCs of 0.946, 0.923, and 0.845 in the training cohort, the internal cohort and external validation cohort, respectively. It surpassed the other three models for differentiating IGM from IBC in all validation cohorts. Additionally, the Fusion_rad + cli-model improved radiologists' diagnostic capabilities, increasing the average accuracy from 0.732 to 0.805 in the internal validation cohort and from 0.717 to 0.792 in the external validation cohort.

The radiomics-clinical model can differentiate IGM from IBC and improve radiologists' diagnostic capabilities on MRI. Further studies are needed to validate these findings in larger, diverse populations and to explore the model's integration into routine diagnostic workflows.

Conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the application of the Radiomics Quality Score (RQS).

A search was conducted from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2023, for systematic reviews which implemented the RQS. Identification of articles prior to 2022 was via a previously published review. Quality scores of individual radiomics papers, their associated criteria scores, and these scores from all readers were extracted. Errors in the application of RQS criteria were noted and corrected. The RQS of radiomics papers were matched with the publication date, imaging modality, and country, where available.

A total of 130 systematic reviews were included, and individual quality scores 117/130 (90.0%), criteria scores 98/130 (75.4%), and multiple reader data 24/130 (18.5%) were extracted. 3258 quality scores were correlated with the radiomics study date of publication. Criteria scoring errors were discovered in 39/98 (39.8%) of articles. Overall mean RQS was 9.4 ± 6.4 (95% CI, 9.1-9.6) (26.1% ± 17.8% (25.3%-26.7%)). Quality scores were positively correlated with publication year (Pearson R = 0.32, p < 0.01) and significantly higher after publication of the RQS (year < 2018, 5.6 ± 6.1 (5.1-6.1); year ≥ 2018, 10.1 ± 6.1 (9.9-10.4); p < 0.01). Only 233/3258 (7.2%) scores were ≥ 50% of the maximum RQS. Quality scores were significantly different across imaging modalities (p < 0.01). Ten criteria were positively correlated with publication year, and one was negatively correlated.

Radiomics study adherence to the RQS is increasing with time, although a vast majority of studies are developmental and rarely provide a high level of evidence to justify the clinical translation of proposed models.

Question What level of adherence to the Radiomics Quality Score have radiomics studies achieved to date, has it increased with time, and is it sufficient? Findings A meta-analysis of 3258 quality scores extracted from 130 review articles resulted in a mean score of 9.4 ± 6.4. Quality scores were positively correlated with time. Clinical relevance Although quality scores of radiomics studies have increased with time, many studies have not demonstrated sufficient evidence for clinical translation. As new appraisal tools emerge, the current role of the Radiomics Quality Score may change.

To systematically evaluate glioma radiomics literature on differentiating between radiation-induced brain injury and tumor recurrence.

Literature was searched on PubMed and Web of Science (end date: May 7, 2024). Quality of eligible papers was assessed using METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS) and Radiomics Quality Score (RQS). Reliability of quality scoring tools were analyzed. Meta-analysis, meta-regression, and subgroup analysis were performed.

Twenty-seven papers were included in the qualitative assessment. Mean average METRICS score and RQS percentage score across three readers was 57% (SD, 14%) and 16% (SD, 12%), respectively. Score-wise inter-rater agreement for METRICS ranged from poor to excellent, while RQS demonstrated moderate to excellent agreement. Item-wise agreement was moderate for both tools. Meta-analysis of 11 eligible studies yielded an estimated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.832 (95% CI, 0.757-0.908), with significant heterogeneity (I2 = 91%) and no statistical publication bias (p = 0.051). Meta-regression did not identify potential sources of heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis revealed high heterogeneity across all subgroups, with the lowest I2 at 68% in studies with proper validation and higher quality scores. Statistical publication bias was generally not significant, except in the subgroup with the lowest heterogeneity (p = 0.044). However, most studies in both qualitative analysis (26/27; 96%) and primary meta-analysis (10/11; 91%) reported positive effects of radiomics, indicating high non-statistical publication bias.

While a good performance was noted for radiomics, results should be interpreted cautiously due to heterogeneity, publication bias, and quality issues thoroughly examined in this study.

Question Radiomic literature on distinguishing radiation-induced brain injury from glioma recurrence lacks systematic reviews and meta-analyses that assess methodological quality using radiomics-specific tools. Findings While the results are encouraging, there was substantial heterogeneity, publication bias toward positive findings, and notable concerns regarding methodological quality. Clinical relevance Meta-analysis results need cautious interpretation due to significant problems detected during the analysis (e.g., suboptimal quality, heterogeneity, bias), which may help explain why radiomics has not yet been translated into clinical practice.

The objective of this study was to develop and validate a radiomics-based machine learning (ML) model to differentiate between renal medullary carcinoma (RMC) and clear cell renal carcinoma (ccRCC).

This retrospective Institutional Review Board -approved study analyzed CT images and clinical data from patients with RMC (n = 87) and ccRCC (n = 93). Patients without contrast-enhanced CT scans obtained before nephrectomy were excluded. A standard volumetric software package (MIM 7.1.4, MIM Software Inc.) was used for contouring, after which 949 radiomics features were extracted with PyRadiomics 3.1.0. Radiomics analysis was then performed with RadAR for differential radiomics analysis. ML was then performed with extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost 2.0.3) to differentiate between RMC and ccRCC. Three separate ML models were created to differentiate between ccRCC and RMC. These models were based on clinical demographics, radiomics, and radiomics incorporating hemoglobin electrophoresis for sickle cell trait, respectively.

Performance metrics for the 3 developed ML models were as follows: demographic factors only (AUC = 0.777), calibrated radiomics (AUC = 0.915), and calibrated radiomics with sickle cell trait incorporated (AUC = 1.0). The top 4 ranked features from differential radiomic analysis, ranked by their importance, were run entropy (preprocessing filter = original, AUC = 0.67), dependence entropy (preprocessing filter = wavelet, AUC = 0.67), zone entropy (preprocessing filter = original, AUC = 0.67), and dependence entropy (preprocessing filter = original, AUC = 0.66).

A radiomics-based machine learning model effectively differentiates between ccRCC and RMC. This tool can facilitate the radiologist's ability to suspicion and decrease the misdiagnosis rate of RMC.

The role of artificial intelligence (AI) tools and deep learning in medical practice in the management of colorectal cancer has gathered significant attention in recent years. Colorectal cancer, being the third most common type of malignancy, requires an innovative approach to augment early detection and advanced surgical techniques to reduce morbidity and mortality. With its emerging potential, AI improves colorectal cancer management by assisting with accuracy in screening, pathology evaluation, precision, and postoperative care. Evidence suggests that AI minimizes missed cases during colorectal cancer screening, plays a promising role in pathology and imaging diagnoses, and facilitates accurate staging. In surgical management, AI demonstrates comparable or superior outcomes to laparoscopic approaches, with reduced hospital stays and conversion rates. However, these outcomes are influenced by clinical expertise and other dependable factors, including expertise in implementing AI-based software and detecting possible errors. Despite these advancements, limited multicenter studies and randomized trials restrict the comprehensive evaluation of AI's true potential and integration into standard practice. We used Pubmed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases for this review. The final number of articles selected, depending on inclusion and exclusion criteria, is 122. We included papers published in the English language, literature published in the last 10 years, and adult patient populations above 35 years with colorectal cancer. We thoroughly included randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, narrative reviews, and case-control studies. The use of AI paves the way for the adoption of more personalized medicine. This review highlights the advantages of AI at various disease stages for colorectal cancer patients and evaluates its potential for cost-effective implementation in clinical practice.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing early cancer detection by enhancing the sensitivity, efficiency, and precision of screening programs for breast, colorectal, and lung cancers. Deep learning algorithms, such as convolutional neural networks, are pivotal in improving diagnostic accuracy by identifying patterns in imaging data that may elude human radiologists. AI has shown remarkable advancements in breast cancer detection, including risk stratification and treatment planning, with models achieving high specificity and precision in identifying invasive ductal carcinoma. In colorectal cancer screening, AI-powered systems significantly enhance polyp detection rates during colonoscopies, optimizing the adenoma detection rate and improving diagnostic workflows. Similarly, low-dose CT scans integrated with AI algorithms are transforming lung cancer screening by increasing the sensitivity and specificity of early-stage cancer detection, while aiding in accurate lesion segmentation and classification. This review highlights the potential of AI to streamline cancer diagnosis and treatment by analyzing vast datasets and reducing diagnostic variability. Despite these advancements, challenges such as data standardization, model generalization, and integration into clinical workflows remain. Addressing these issues through collaborative research, enhanced dataset diversity, and improved explainability of AI models will be critical for widespread adoption. The findings underscore AI's potential to significantly impact patient outcomes and reduce cancer-related mortality, emphasizing the need for further validation and optimization in diverse healthcare settings.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is classified according to the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), but kidney volume (KV) can also provide meaningful information. Very few radiomics (RDX) studies on CKD have utilized computed tomography (CT). This study aimed to determine whether non-enhanced computed tomography (NECT)-based RDX can be useful in evaluation of patients with CKD and to compare it with KV.

The NECT scans of 64 subjects with impaired kidney function (defined as <60 mL/min/1.73 m2) and 60 controls with normal kidney function were retrospectively analyzed. Kidney segmentations, volume measurements, and RDX features extraction were performed. Machine-learning models using RDX were constructed to classify the kidneys as having structural markers of impaired or normal function.

The median KV in the impaired kidney function group was 114.83 mL vs. 159.43 mL (p < 0.001) in the control group. There was a statistically significant strong positive correlation between KV and eGFR (rs = 0.579, p < 0.001) and a strong negative correlation between KV and serum creatinine level (rs = -0.514, p < 0.001). The KV-based models achieved the best area under the curve (AUC) of 0.746, whereas the RDX-based models achieved the best AUC of 0.878.

RDX can be useful in identifying patients with impaired kidney function on NECT. RDX-based models outperformed KV-based models. RDX has the potential to identify patients with a higher risk of CKD based on imaging, which, as we believe, can indirectly support clinical decision-making.

Oral mucositis (OM) reflects a complex interplay of several risk factors. Machine learning (ML) is a promising frontier in science, capable of processing dense information. This study aims to assess the performance of ML in predicting OM risk in patients undergoing head and neck radiotherapy.

Clinical data were collected from 157 patients with oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma submitted to radiotherapy. Grade 2 OM or higher was considered (NCI). Two dataset versions were used; in the first version, all data were considered, and in the second version, a feature selection was added. Age, smoking status, surgery, radiotherapy prescription dose, treatment modality, histopathological differentiation, tumor stage, presence of oral cancer lesion, and tumor location were selected as key features. The training process used a fivefold cross-validation strategy with 10 repetitions. A total of 4 algorithms and 3 scaling methods were trained (12 models), without using data augmentation.

A comparative assessment was performed. Accuracy greater than 55% was considered. No relevant results were achieved with the first version, closest performance was Decision Trees with 52% of accuracy, 42% of sensitivity, and 60% of specificity. For the second version, relevant results were achieved, K-Nearest Neighbors outperformed with 64% accuracy, 58% sensitivity, and 68% specificity.

ML demonstrated promising results in OM risk prediction. Model improvement was observed after feature selection. Best result was achieved with the KNN model. This is the first study to test ML for OM risk prediction using clinical data.

Background/Objectives: Traumatic acute subdural hematoma (aSDH) often requires surgical intervention, such as craniotomy, to relieve mass lesions and pressure. The extent of hematoma evacuation significantly impacts patient outcomes. This study utilizes 3D Slicer software to analyse post-craniotomy hematoma volume changes and evaluate their prognostic significance in aSDH patients. Methods: Among 178 adult patients diagnosed with aSDH from January 2015 to December 2022, 64 underwent hematoma evacuation via craniotomy. Initial scans were performed within 24 h of trauma, followed by routine postoperative scans to assess residual hematoma. We conducted radiomic analysis of preoperative and postoperative volumes, surface area, Feret diameter, sphericity, flatness, and elongation. Clinical parameters, including SOFA score, APACHE score, pupillary response, comorbidities, age, anticoagulation status, and preoperative haematocrit and haemoglobin levels, were also evaluated. Results: Changes in Δ surface area significantly correlated with 30-day outcomes (p = 0.03) and showed moderate predictive accuracy (AUC = 0.65). Patients with a Δ surface area > 30,090 mm2 experienced poorer outcomes (OR = 6.66, p = 0.02). Significant features included preoperative surface area (p = 0.009), Feret diameter (p = 0.0012). In multivariate analysis, only the Feret diameter remained significant (p = 0.01). Conclusions: Postoperative Δ surface area is, among other variables, a strong predictor of 30-day outcomes, while in multivariate analysis, preoperative Feret diameter remains the only independent predictor. Radiomic analysis with 3D Slicer may enhance prognostic accuracy and inform tailored therapeutic strategies.

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a proven and widely accepted treatment option for hepatocellular carcinoma and it is recommended as first-line non-curative therapy for BCLC B/intermediate HCC (preserved liver function, multifocal, no cancer-related symptoms) in patients without vascular involvement. Different types of TACE are available nowadays, including TAE, c-TACE, DEB-TACE, and DSM-TACE, but at present there is insufficient evidence to recommend one TACE technique over another and the choice is left to the operator. This review then aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current literature on indications, types of procedures, safety, and efficacy of different TACE treatments.

Background: Hypoxic-ischemic brain injury (HIBI) is a feared complication post-cardiac arrest (CA). The timing of brain imaging remains a topic of ongoing debate. Early computed tomography (CT) scans can reveal acute intracranial pathologies but may have limited predictive value due to delayed manifestation of HIBI-related changes. Radiomics analyses present a promising approach to identifying subtle imaging markers, potentially aiding early HIBI detection. Methods: This study retrospectively assessed post-CA patients between 2016 and 2023 who received immediate brain CTs. Patients without acute intracranial pathology on initial scans and who underwent follow-up brain CTs within 14 days post-return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) were included. Image segmentation involved manual basalganglia segmentation and automated whole-brain segmentation. Radiomics features were calculated using Pyradiomics (v3.0.1) in 3DSlicer (v5.2.2). Feature selection involved reproducibility analysis via ICC and LASSO regression, retaining five features per segmentation method. A logistic regression model for each segmentation method underwent 5-fold cross-validation. Results were summarized with ROC analyses and average sensitivity and specificity. Results: A total of 83 patients (average age: 65 ± 13.3 years, 19 women) with CA and ROSC were included. Follow-up CT scans after 5.2 ± 2.9 days revealed brain edema in 47 patients. The model using manual segmentation achieved an average AUC of 0.76, sensitivity of 0.59, and specificity of 0.78. The automated segmentation model showed an average AUC of 0.66, sensitivity of 0.49, and specificity of 0.68. Conclusions: Radiomics, particularly focused on the basalganglia area in normal-appearing brain CTs after CA and ROSC, may enhance predictive insights for HIBI and the development of brain edema.

Early identification of pancreatitis remains a significant clinical diagnostic challenge that impacts patient outcomes. The evolution of quantitative imaging followed by deep learning models has shown great promise in the non-invasive diagnosis of pancreatitis and its complications. We provide an overview of advancements in diagnostic imaging and quantitative imaging methods along with the evolution of artificial intelligence (AI). In this article, we review the current and future states of methodology and limitations of AI in improving clinical support in the context of early detection and management of pancreatitis.

The topic of the diagnosis of phaeochromocytomas remains highly relevant because of advances in laboratory diagnostics, genetics, and therapeutic options and also the development of imaging methods. Computed tomography still represents an essential tool in clinical practice, especially in incidentally discovered adrenal masses; it allows morphological evaluation, including size, shape, necrosis, and unenhanced attenuation. More advanced post-processing tools to analyse digital images, such as texture analysis and radiomics, are currently being studied. Radiomic features utilise digital image pixels to calculate parameters and relations undetectable by the human eye. On the other hand, the amount of radiomic data requires massive computer capacity. Radiomics, together with machine learning and artificial intelligence in general, has the potential to improve not only the differential diagnosis but also the prediction of complications and therapy outcomes of phaeochromocytomas in the future. Currently, the potential of radiomics and machine learning does not match expectations and awaits its fulfilment.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States, largely due to its poor five-year survival rate and frequent late-stage diagnosis. A significant barrier to early detection even in high-risk cohorts is that the pancreas often appears morphologically normal during the pre-diagnostic phase. Yet, the disease can progress rapidly from subclinical stages to widespread metastasis, undermining the effectiveness of screening. Recently, artificial intelligence (AI) applied to cross-sectional imaging has shown significant potential in identifying subtle, early-stage changes in pancreatic tissue that are often imperceptible to the human eye. Moreover, AI-driven imaging also aids in the discovery of prognostic and predictive biomarkers, essential for personalized treatment planning. This article uniquely integrates a critical discussion on AI's role in detecting visually occult PDAC on pre-diagnostic imaging, addresses challenges of model generalizability, and emphasizes solutions like standardized datasets and clinical workflows. By focusing on both technical advancements and practical implementation, this article provides a forward-thinking conceptual framework that bridges current gaps in AI-driven PDAC research.

Backgrounds: Although COVID-19 is primarily known as a respiratory disease, there is growing evidence of neurological complications, such as ischemic stroke, in infected individuals. This study aims to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on acute ischemic stroke (AIS) using radiomic features extracted from brain MR images and machine learning methods. Methods: This retrospective study included MRI data from 57 patients diagnosed with AIS who presented to the Department of Radiology at Hacettepe University Hospital between March 2020 and September 2021. Patients were stratified into COVID-19-positive (n = 30) and COVID-19-negative (n = 27) groups based on PCR results. Radiomic features were extracted from brain MR images following image processing steps. Various feature selection algorithms were applied to identify the most relevant features, which were then used to train and evaluate machine learning classification models. Model performance was evaluated using a range of classification metrics, including measures of predictive accuracy and diagnostic reliability, with 95% confidence intervals provided to enhance reliability. Results: This study assessed the performance of dimensionality reduction and classification algorithms in distinguishing COVID-19-negative and COVID-19-positive cases using radiomics data from brain MR scans. Without feature selection, ANN achieved the highest AUC of 0.857 (95% CI: 0.806-0.900), demonstrating strong discriminative power. Using the Boruta method for feature selection, the k-NN classifier attained the best performance, with an AUC of 0.863 (95% CI: 0.816-0.904). LASSO-based feature selection showed comparable results across k-NN, RF, and ANN classifiers, while SVM exhibited excellent specificity and high PPV. The RFE method yielded the highest overall performance, with the k-NN classifier achieving an AUC of 0.882 (95% CI: 0.838-0.924) and an accuracy of 79.1% (95% CI: 73.6-83.8). Among the methods, RFE provided the most consistent results, with k-NN and the ANN identified as the most effective classifiers for COVID-19 detection. Conclusions: The proposed radiomics-based classification model effectively distinguishes AIS associated with COVID-19 from brain MRI. These findings demonstrate the potential of AI-driven diagnostic tools to identify high-risk patients, support optimized treatment strategies, and ultimately improve clinical implications.

To construct a 2.5-dimensional (2.5D) CT radiomics-based deep learning (DL) model to predict early postoperative recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients who underwent HCC resection at 2 centers. The 232 patients from center 1 were randomly divided into the training (162 patients) and internal validation cohorts (70 patients); 91 patients from center 2 formed the external validation cohort. We developed a 2.5D DL model based on a central 2D image with the maximum tumor cross-section and adjacent slices. Multiple views (transverse, sagittal, and coronal) and phases (arterial, plain, and portal) were incorporated. Multi-instance learning techniques were applied to the extracted data; the resulting comprehensive feature set was modeled using Logistic Regression, RandomForest, ExtraTrees, XGBoost, and LightGBM, with 5-fold cross validation and hyperparameter optimization with Grid-search. Receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration curves, DeLong test, and decision curve analysis were used to evaluate model performance.

The 2.5D DL model performed well in the training (AUC: 0.920), internal validation (AUC: 0.825), and external validation cohorts (AUC: 0.795). The 3D DL model performed well in the training cohort and poorly in the internal and external validation cohorts (AUCs: 0.751, 0.666, and 0.567, respectively), indicating overfitting. The combined model (2.5D DL+clinical) performed well in all cohorts (AUCs: 0.921, 0.835, 0.804). The Hosmer-Lemeshow test, DeLong test, and decision curve analysis confirmed the superiority of the combined model over the other signatures.

The combined model integrating 2.5D DL and clinical features accurately predicts early postoperative HCC recurrence.

Radiomics is a quantitative tool for digital image analysis. This systematic review aims to investigate the scientific articles to evaluate the potential implications of Radiomics analysis in Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR). Studies regarding Radiomics applications in DMFR and human samples, in vivo study, a case reports/series if ≧5 samples were included, while case reports/series if < 5 samples, articles other than in English, abstracts without full text, and studies published before 2015 were excluded. Fifty-one articles were selected from 3789 literatures. The QUADAS-2 tool was used for risk of bias assessment. The accuracy of predicting dentomaxillofacial pathologies was considered as the primary outcome, and the modeling type of Radiomics was considered as the secondary outcome. A meta-analysis could not be performed due to the lack of information and standardization among the reported accuracies. The reported accuracies were found between 0.66 and 99.65%. Logistic regression (n = 6) was found to be the most common Radiomics modeling type, followed by Support Vector Machine and Decision Tree (n = 5). Second-order statistics (n = 38) was the most common type of Radiomics application, followed by first-order (n = 26), higher-order (n = 20), and shape-based (n = 15) statistics. Further work is needed to increase standardization in the Radiomics workflow. Quantitative image analysis is an alternative tool for conventional visual radiographic evaluation. Radiomics systems depend on elements such as imaging modality, feature type, data mining, or statistical method. Radiomics applications do not justify digital transformation on their own, but the potential of its integration into the digital workflow is considerable.

Although radiomics research has experienced rapid growth in recent years, with numerous studies dedicated to the automated extraction of diagnostic and prognostic information from various imaging modalities, such as CT, PET, and MRI, only a small fraction of these findings has successfully transitioned into clinical practice. This gap is primarily due to the significant methodological challenges involved in radiomics research, which emphasize the need for a rigorous evaluation of study quality. While many technical aspects may lie outside the expertise of most radiologists, having a foundational knowledge is essential for evaluating the quality of radiomics workflows and contributing, together with data scientists, to the development of models with a real-world clinical impact. This review is designed for the new generation of radiologists, who may not have specialized training in machine learning or radiomics, but will inevitably play a role in this evolving field. The paper has two primary objectives: first, to provide a clear, systematic guide to radiomics study pipeline, including study design, image preprocessing, feature selection, model training and validation, and performance evaluation. Furthermore, given the critical importance of evaluating the robustness of radiomics studies, this review offers a step-by-step guide to the application of the METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS, 2024)-a newly proposed tool for assessing the quality of radiomics studies. This roadmap aims to support researchers and reviewers alike, regardless of their machine learning expertise, in utilizing this tool for effective study evaluation.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is a rapidly growing field with significant implications for radiology. Acute abdominal pain is a common clinical presentation that can range from benign conditions to life-threatening emergencies. The critical nature of these situations renders emergent abdominal imaging an ideal candidate for AI applications. CT, radiographs, and ultrasound are the most common modalities for imaging evaluation of these patients. For each modality, numerous studies have assessed the performance of AI models for detecting common pathologies, such as appendicitis, bowel obstruction, and cholecystitis. The capabilities of these models range from simple classification to detailed severity assessment. This narrative review explores the evolution, trends, and challenges in AI applications for evaluating acute abdominal pathologies. We review implementations of AI for non-traumatic and traumatic abdominal pathologies, with discussion of potential clinical impact, challenges, and future directions for the technology.

A portion of individuals diagnosed with primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSL) may experience early relapse or refractory (R/R) disease following treatment. This research explored the potential of MRI-based radiomics in forecasting R/R cases in PCNSL. Forty-six patients with pathologically confirmed PCNSL diagnosed between January 2008 and December 2020 were included in this study. Only patients who underwent pretreatment brain MRIs and complete postoperative follow-up MRIs were included. Pretreatment contrast-enhanced T1WI, T2WI, and T2 FLAIR imaging were analyzed. A total of 107 radiomic features, including 14 shape-based, 18 first-order statistical, and 75 texture features, were extracted from each sequence. Predictive models were then built using five different machine learning algorithms to predict R/R in PCNSL. Of the included 46 PCNSL patients, 20 (20/46, 43.5%) patients were found to have R/R. In the R/R group, the median scores in predictive models such as support vector machine, k-nearest neighbors, linear discriminant analysis, naïve Bayes, and decision trees were significantly higher, while the apparent diffusion coefficient values were notably lower compared to those without R/R (p < 0.05). The support vector machine model exhibited the highest performance, achieving an overall prediction accuracy of 83%, a precision rate of 80%, and an AUC of 0.78. Additionally, when analyzing tumor progression, patients with elevated support vector machine and naïve Bayes scores demonstrated a significantly reduced progression-free survival (p < 0.05). These findings suggest that preoperative MRI-based radiomics may provide critical insights for treatment strategies in PCNSL.

Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) is a serious fungal infection. However, current diagnostic methods have limitations. The purpose of this study was to use artificial intelligence to achieve a more accurate diagnosis of IPA.

Totally 263 patients (148 cases of IPA, 115 cases of non-IPA) were retrospectively enrolled from a single institution and randomly divided into training and test sets at a ratio of 7:3. Clinic-radiological independent risk factors for IPA were screened using univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis, after which a clinic-radiological model was constructed. The optimal radiomics features were extracted and screened based on CT images to construct the radiomics label score (Rad-score) and radiomics model. The optimal DL features were extracted and screened using four pre-trained convolutional neural networks, respectively, followed by the construction of the DL label score (DL-score) and DL model. Then, the radiomics-DL model was constructed. Finally, the combined model was constructed based on clinic-radiological independent risk factors, the Rad-score, and the DL-score. LR was adopted as the classifier. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn, and the areas under the curve (AUC) were calculated to evaluate the efficacy of each model in predicting IPA. Additionally, based on the best-performing model on the LR classifier, four other machine learning (ML) classifiers were constructed to evaluate the predictive value for IPA.

The AUC of the clinic-radiological model for predicting IPA in the training and test sets was 0.845 and 0.765, respectively. The AUC of the radiomics-DL and combined models in the training set was 0.871 and 0.932, while in the test set was 0.851 and 0.881, respectively. The combined model showed better predictive performance than all other models. DCA showed that taking 0.00-1.00 as the threshold, the clinical benefit of the combined model was higher than that of all other models. Then, the combined model was trained on four other machine learning classifiers, all of which achieved AUC values above 0.80 in the test set, showing good performance in predicting IPA.

Clinic, CT radiomics, and DL combined model could be used to predict IPA effectively.

Positron emission tomography (PET) using radiolabeled prostate-specific membrane antigen targeting PET-imaging agents has been increasingly used over the past decade for imaging and directing prostate carcinoma treatment. Here, we summarize the available literature data on radiomics and machine learning using these imaging agents in prostate carcinoma. Gleason scores derived from biopsy and after resection are discordant in a large number of prostate carcinoma patients. Available studies suggest that radiomics and machine learning applied to PSMA-radioligand avid primary prostate carcinoma might be better performing than biopsy-based Gleason-scoring and could serve as an alternative for non-invasive GS characterization. Furthermore, it may allow for the prediction of biochemical recurrence with a net benefit for clinical utilization. Machine learning based on PET/CT radiomics features was also shown to be able to differentiate benign from malignant increased tracer uptake on PSMA-targeting radioligand PET/CT examinations, thus paving the way for a fully automated image reading in nuclear medicine. As for prediction to treatment outcome following 177Lu-PSMA therapy and overall survival, a limited number of studies have reported promising results on radiomics and machine learning applied to PSMA-targeting radioligand PET/CT images for this purpose. Its added value to clinical parameters warrants further exploration in larger datasets of patients.

Cardiovascular disease affects the carotid arteries, coronary arteries, aorta and the peripheral arteries. Radiomics involves the extraction of quantitative data from imaging features that are imperceptible to the eye. Radiomics analysis in cardiovascular disease has largely focused on CT and MRI modalities. This scoping review aims to summarise the existing literature on radiomic analysis techniques in cardiovascular disease.

MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched for eligible studies evaluating radiomic techniques in living human subjects derived from CT, MRI or PET imaging investigating atherosclerotic disease. Data on study population, imaging characteristics and radiomics methodology were extracted.

Twenty-nine studies consisting of 5753 patients (3752 males) were identified, and 78.7% of patients were from coronary artery studies. Twenty-seven studies employed CT imaging (19 CT carotid angiography and 6 CT coronary angiography (CTCA)), and two studies studied PET/CT. Manual segmentation was most frequently undertaken. Processing techniques included voxel discretisation, voxel resampling and filtration. Various shape, first-order, second-order and higher-order radiomic features were extracted. Logistic regression was most commonly used for machine learning.

Most published evidence was feasibility/proof of concept work. There was significant heterogeneity in image acquisition, segmentation techniques, processing and analysis between studies. There is a need for the implementation of standardised imaging acquisition protocols, adherence to published reporting guidelines and economic evaluation.

To investigate the effectiveness of machine learning-based clinical, radiomics, and combined models in differentiating idiopathic granulomatous mastitis (IGM) from malignancy, both presenting as non-mass enhancement (NME) lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and to compare these models with radiological evaluation.

A total of 178 patients (69 IGM and 109 breast cancer patients) with NME on breast MRI evaluated between March 2018 and April 2022, were included in this two-center study. Age, skin changes, presence of fistula, and abscess were recorded from hospital records. Two experienced radiologists evaluated MRI images according to the breast imaging reporting and data system 2013 lexicon. Lesions were segmented independently on T2-weighted, apparent diffusion coefficient, and post-contrast-T1-weighted sequences. Data were split into training and external testing sets. Machine learning models were built using Light GBM (light gradient-boosting machine). Radiological, clinical, radiomics, and clinical-radiomics models were created and compared. Decision curve analysis was performed. Quality of reporting and that of methodology were evaluated using CLEAR and METRICS tools.

IGM group was younger (p = 0.014). Abscesses (p < 0.001), fistulas (p < 0.001), and skin changes (p < 0.001) were significantly more common in the IGM group. No significant difference was detected in terms of lesion size (p = 0.213). In the evaluation of NME, the lowest performance belonged to the radiologists' evaluation (AUC for training, 0.740; for testing, 0.737), while the highest AUC was achieved by the model developed by combined clinical and radiomics features (AUC for training, 0.979; for testing, 0.942).

Our study has shown that the machine learning-based clinical-radiomics model might have the potential to accurately discriminate IGM and malignant lesions in evaluating NME areas.

The rise of high-definition imaging and robotic surgery has independently been associated with improved postoperative outcomes. However, steep learning curves and finite human cognitive ability limit the facility in imaging interpretation and interaction with the robotic surgery console interfaces. This review presents innovative ways in which artificial intelligence integrates preoperative imaging and surgery to help overcome these limitations and to further advance robotic operations.

PubMed was queried for "artificial intelligence," "machine learning," and "robotic surgery." From the 182 publications in English, a further in-depth review of the cited literature was performed.

Artificial intelligence boasts efficiency and proclivity for large amounts of unwieldy and unstructured data. Its wide adoption has significant practice-changing implications throughout the perioperative period. Assessment of preoperative imaging can augment preoperative surgeon knowledge by accessing pathology data that have been traditionally only available postoperatively through analysis of preoperative imaging. Intraoperatively, the interaction of artificial intelligence with augmented reality through the dynamic overlay of preoperative anatomical knowledge atop the robotic operative field can outline safe dissection planes, helping surgeons make critical real-time intraoperative decisions. Finally, semi-independent artificial intelligence-assisted robotic operations may one day be performed by artificial intelligence with limited human intervention.

As artificial intelligence has allowed machines to think and problem-solve like humans, it promises further advancement of existing technologies and a revolution of individualized patient care. Further research and ethical precautions are necessary before the full implementation of artificial intelligence in robotic surgery.

To assess differences in radiomics derived from semi-automatic segmentation of liver metastases for stable disease (SD), partial response (PR), and progressive disease (PD) based on RECIST1.1 and to assess if radiomics alone at baseline can predict response.

Our IRB-approved study included 203 women (mean age 54 ± 11 years) with metastatic liver disease from breast cancer. All patients underwent contrast abdomen-pelvis CT in the portal venous phase at two points: baseline (pre-treatment) and follow-up (between 3 and 12 months following treatment). Patients were subcategorized into three subgroups based on RECIST 1.1 criteria (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1): 66 with SD, 69 with PR, and 68 with PD on follow-up CT. The deidentified baseline and follow-up CT images were exported to the radiomics prototype. The prototype enabled semi-automatic segmentation of the target liver lesions for the extraction of first and high order radiomics. Statistical analyses with logistic regression and random forest classifiers were performed to differentiate SD from PD and PR.

There was no significant difference between the radiomics on the baseline and follow-up CT images of patients with SD (area under the curve (AUC): 0.3). Random forest classifier differentiated patients with PR with an AUC of 0.845. The most relevant feature was the large dependence emphasis's high and low pass wavelet filter (derived gray level dependence matrix features). Random forest classifier differentiated PD with an AUC of 0.731, with the most relevant feature being the surface-to-volume ratio. There was no difference in radiomics among the three groups at baseline; therefore, a response could not be predicted.

Radiomics of liver metastases with semi-automatic segmentation demonstrate differences between SD from PR and PD.

Semiautomatic segmentation and radiomics of metastatic liver disease demonstrate differences in SD from the PR and progressive metastatic on the baseline and follow-up CT. Despite substantial variations in the scanners, acquisition, and reconstruction parameters, radiomics had an AUC of 0.84-0.89 for differentiating stable hepatic metastases from decreasing and increasing metastatic disease.

123I-Ioflupane SPECT is an effective tool for the diagnosis and progression assessment of Parkinson's disease (PD). Radiomics and deep learning (DL) can be used to track and analyze the underlying image texture and features to predict the Hoehn-Yahr stages (HYS) of PD. In this study, we aim to predict HYS at year 0 and year 4 after the first diagnosis with combined imaging, radiomics and DL-based features using 123I-Ioflupane SPECT images at year 0.

In this study, 161 subjects from the Parkinson's Progressive Marker Initiative database underwent baseline 3T MRI and 123I-Ioflupane SPECT, with HYS assessment at years 0 and 4 after first diagnosis. Conventional imaging features (IF) and radiomic features (RaF) for striatum uptakes were extracted from SPECT images using MRI- and SPECT-based (SPECT-V and SPECT-T) segmentations respectively. A 2D DenseNet was used to predict HYS of PD, and simultaneously generate deep features (DF). The random forest algorithm was applied to develop models based on DF, RaF, IF and combined features to predict HYS (stage 0, 1 and 2) at year 0 and (stage 0, 1 and ≥ 2) at year 4, respectively. Model predictive accuracy and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were assessed for various prediction models.

For the diagnostic accuracy at year 0, DL (0.696) outperformed most models, except DF + IF in SPECT-V (0.704), significantly superior based on paired t-test. For year 4, accuracy of DF + RaF model in MRI-based method is the highest (0.835), significantly better than DF + IF, IF + RaF, RaF and IF models. And DL (0.820) surpassed models in both SPECT-based methods. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) highlighted DF + RaF model (0.854) in MRI-based method at year 0 and DF + RaF model (0.869) in SPECT-T method at year 4, outperforming DL models, respectively. And then, there was no significant differences between SPECT-based and MRI-based segmentation methods except for the imaging feature models.

The combination of radiomic and deep features enhances the prediction accuracy of PD HYS compared to only radiomics or DL. This suggests the potential for further advancements in predictive model performance for PD HYS at year 0 and year 4 after first diagnosis using 123I-Ioflupane SPECT images at year 0, thereby facilitating early diagnosis and treatment for PD patients. No significant difference was observed in radiomics results obtained between MRI- and SPECT-based striatum segmentations for radiomic and deep features.

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography (CT)-based radiomic algorithms and deep learning models to preoperatively identify lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, Web of Science and IEEE databases were searched to identify relevant studies published up until February 11, 2024. Two reviewers screened all papers independently for eligibility. Studies reporting the accuracy of CT-based radiomics or deep learning models for detecting LNM in PDAC, using histopathology as the reference standard, were included. Quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2, the Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) and the the METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS). Overall sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and the area under the curve (AUC) were calculated.

Four radiomics studies comprising 213 patients and four deep learning studies with 272 patients were included. The average RQS total score was 12.00 ± 3.89, corresponding to an RQS percentage of 33.33 ± 10.80, while the average METRICS score was 63.60 ± 10.88. A significant and strong positive correlation was found between RQS and METRICS (p = 0.016; r = 0.810). The pooled SE, SP, DOR, and AUC of all the studies were 0.83 (95 %CI = 0.77-0.88), 0.76 (95 %CI = 0.62-0.86), 15.70 (95 %CI = 8.12-27.50) and 0.85 (95 %CI = 0.77-0.88). Meta-regression analysis results indicated that neither the study type (radiomics vs deep learning) nor the dataset size of the studies had a significant effect on the DOR (p = 0.09 and p = 0.26, respectively).

Based on our meta-analysis findings, preoperative CT-based radiomics algorithms and deep learning models demonstrate favorable performance in predicting LNM in patients with PDAC, with a strong correlation between RQS and METRICS of the included studies.

Carotid atherosclerosis plays a substantial role in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Given the multifaceted impact of this disease, there has been increasing interest in harnessing artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics as complementary tools for the quantitative analysis of medical imaging data. This integrated approach holds promise not only in refining medical imaging data analysis but also in optimizing the utilization of radiologists' expertise. By automating time consuming tasks, AI allows radiologists to focus on more pertinent responsibilities. Simultaneously, the capacity of AI in radiomics to extract nuanced patterns from raw data enhances the exploration of carotid atherosclerosis, advancing efforts in terms of (1) early detection and diagnosis, (2) risk stratification and predictive modeling, (3) improving workflow efficiency, and (4) contributing to advancements in research. This review provides an overview of general concepts related to radiomics and AI, along with their application in the field of carotid vulnerable plaque. It also offers insights into various research studies conducted on this topic across different imaging techniques.