Open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA) has been increasingly replaced by endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) in many centers. Despite being a minimally invasive procedure, EVAR is associated with a risk of abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS), which can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. This study examines the incidence and clinical manifestation of ACS in a consecutive cohort of rAAA patients treated exclusively with EVAR at Örebro University Hospital over a 12-year period.

This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. We identified 139 patients who had presented to Örebro University Hospital with rAAA between October 2009 and September 2021. Patients with isolated iliac artery, thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic ruptures, previous aortic interventions (open or endovascular), and patients receiving palliative treatment were excluded. Patients developing ACS after rAAA were compared with those who did not develop ACS.

A total of 100 patients treated using EVAR were included in this study. ACS was identified in 17 patients, and these were compared with 83 patients who did not develop ACS. Mortality at 30 days was 53% in the ACS group (9/17) and 22% in the No-ACS group (18/83, p = 0.015). Regression analysis showed that advanced age and ACS were independent risk factors for death, with ACS increasing the hazard 4-fold (HR 4.26, CI 1.99-9.10, p < 0.001) and age increasing the hazard by 6% for every year (HR 1.06, CI 1.06-1.1, p = 0.004). The use of aortic balloon occlusion was not independently associated with the development of ACS.

ACS is a life-threatening complication of rAAA treated using EVAR and a significant number of patients developed ACS with high mortality and complication rates. All rAAA patients treated using EVAR should be monitored closely for ACS and treatment with decompressive laparotomy should be initiated without delay.Clinical ImpactOpen repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA) has been increasingly replaced by endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). Despite being a minimally invasive procedure, EVAR is associated with a risk of abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS), which can lead to significant morbidity and mortality This article investigates abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) in a cohort of total endovascular treated rAAA in a single centre and the treatment as well as the results, and gives insight on ACS in this patient group and might contribute to better understanding how to treat them and avoid this life-threatening complication.

Background: Prone positioning is a standard intervention in managing patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and is known to improve oxygenation. However, its effects on other organs, particularly the kidneys, are less well understood. This study aimed to assess the association between prone positioning and the development of acute kidney injury (AKI), specifically in overweight and obese patients. Methods: A retrospective pre-post study was conducted on a cohort of 60 critically ill ARDS patients who were placed in the prone position during hospitalization. The development of AKI was assessed using the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) criteria, with AKI measured by both creatinine levels (AKINCr) and urine output (AKINUO). Patients were divided into two groups based on body mass index (BMI): overweight/obese (BMI ≥ 25) and non-obese (BMI < 25). Data were collected before and after prone positioning. Results: In overweight/obese patients (n = 39, 57 cases), both the median AKINCr and AKINUO scores increased significantly following prone positioning (from 0 to 1, median p < 0.01, and from 0 to 2, median p < 0.01, respectively). No statistically significant changes in AKIN scores were observed in non-obese patients nor were significant differences found in either group after repositioning to supine. Conclusions: Prone positioning is associated with an increased risk of acute kidney injury in overweight and obese ARDS patients. This may be due to the kidneys' susceptibility to intra-abdominal hypertension in these patients. Further research is needed to explore optimal proning strategies for overweight and obese populations.

Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) impact morbidity and mortality in burn patients, exacerbated by extensive fluid resuscitation required for more than 20% of total body surface area burns. We report a case of a 28-year-old male with severe burns and a TBSA of 49% who presented after a fire incident. The trauma team managed the patient's fluid resuscitation, followed by early burn debridement. A TraumaGuard catheter was used for continuous intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) monitoring. On the second day of admission, a critical IAP of 20 mm Hg was detected, indicative of impending ACS. Immediate intervention with cistracurium and increased sedation reduced the IAP to 9 mm Hg, preventing the progression to ACS. This case demonstrates the importance of routine IAP monitoring in severely burned patients to prevent ACS. Early identification and management of elevated IAP can avert the progression to ACS and reduce the need for more invasive interventions.

Abdominal compartment syndrome has been shown to be a highly morbid condition among patients admitted to the intensive care unit. The present study sought to characterize trends as well as clinical and financial outcomes of patients with abdominal compartment syndrome.

The 2010 to 2020 National Inpatient Sample was used to identify adults (≥18 years) admitted to the intensive care unit. Standard mean differences were obtained to demonstrate effect size with >0.1 denoting significance. Hospitals were divided into tertiles based on annual institutional intensive care unit admissions. Multivariable regression models were used to evaluate the association of abdominal compartment syndrome on outcomes. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality, while complications, costs, and length of stay were secondarily considered.

Of 11,804,585 patients, 19,644 (0.17%) developed abdominal compartment syndrome. Over the study period, the incidence of abdominal compartment syndrome (2010-0.19%, 2020-0.20%, P < .001) remained similar. Those with abdominal compartment syndrome were more commonly admitted for gastrointestinal (22.8% vs 8.4%) and cardiovascular (22.6% vs 14.9%) etiologies and were more frequently managed at urban teaching hospitals (77.7% vs 65.1%) as well as high-volume intensive care units (85.2% vs 79.1%) (all standard mean differences >0.1). After adjustment, abdominal compartment syndrome was associated with higher odds of mortality (adjusted odds ratio: 3.84, 95% confidence interval: 3.57-4.13, reference: non-abdominal compartment syndrome). Incremental length of stay (β: +5.0 days, 95% confidence interval: 4.2-5.8) and costs (β: $49.3K, 95% confidence interval: 45.3-53.4) were significantly higher in abdominal compartment syndrome compared to non-abdominal compartment syndrome.

Abdominal compartment syndrome, while an uncommon occurrence among intensive care unit patients, remains highly morbid with significant resource burden. Further work exploring factors to mitigate its clinical and financial burden is needed.

An increased intra-abdominal pressure can result in a manifest abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) with significant organ damage, which is a life-threatening situation associated with a high mortality. Although the etiology is manifold and critically ill patients on the intensive care unit are particularly endangered, the disease is often not diagnosed even though the measurement of bladder pressure is available as a simple and standardized method; however, particularly the early detection of an increased intra-abdominal pressure is decisive in order to prevent the occurrence of a manifest ACS with (multi)organ failure by means of conservative measures. In cases of a conservative refractory situation, decompressive laparotomy is indicated.

Introduction The acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI) score was proposed by the Working Group on Abdominal Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) as a tool to define and grade gut dysfunction. There have not been any studies in India to validate this tool. The objective of this preliminary study was primarily to study the frequency of AGI in the first week of ICU stay in critically ill patients in our intensive care unit (ICU). We also sought to determine the risk factors predisposing to the development of AGI and to determine the prognostic implication of gastrointestinal (GI) injury in critically ill patients. Materials and methods A prospective, observational, preliminary, single-center study was conducted on critically ill patients (APACHE II > 8) who were on enteral tube feeds and admitted to a mixed ICU of a tertiary care hospital. Anthropometric data, admission diagnosis, APACHE II score, and comorbidities were recorded. Data of daily heart rate, mean arterial pressure, dose of vasopressors, intra-abdominal pressure, fluid balance, feeding intolerance, mechanical ventilation, and laboratory tests were noted for the first seven days of ICU stay or till ICU discharge, whichever was earlier. The occurrence of AGI score (1-4) during the first seven days of critical illness was the primary outcome of interest. Patient outcome at 28 days was recorded and the impact of the occurrence of AGI on patient outcome was analyzed using the Chi-square test. The patient characteristics associated with AGI were characterized as risk factors and analyzed using a multivariate model. Results Data were collected from 33 patients over 201 patient days. The frequency of acute GI dysfunction in the first seven days of ICU stay in our group of patients was 45.45% (15/33). APACHE II, fluid balance, creatinine, and lactate were identified as possible predictors of GI injury based on existing literature. These four variables were entered into an ordinal logistic regression model to assess their ability to predict the occurrence of GI Injury. When fitted into a predictive model, only fluid balance and creatinine were predictive of the final model (p-value < 0.05). A greater fluid balance was predictive in the final model of the development of GI injury; however, it showed negligible clinical significance (OR: 1.00033, 95% CI: 1.000051-1.00061). Lower creatinine levels were predictive in the final model of the development of AGI Injury, as demonstrated by the negative coefficient. Creatinine also had a greater clinical significance (OR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.44-0.90) in the development of AGI. The impact of the AGI scores on mortality was analyzed. The number of patient days with higher AGI scores was significantly associated with increased mortality at 28 days (p-value < 0.001). Conclusion The study showed that nearly half of the critically ill patients included in the study developed acute GI dysfunction. We could not identify any predictors of GI injury based on our results. The result suggested an association between the severity of GI dysfunction and mortality at 28 days.

Continuing studies related to Abdominal Compartment Syndrome (ACS) is imperative in terms of its significant effect on morbidity and mortality rates. To establish bibliometric analysis as a comprehensive review of ACS literature. The process encompasses many phases, such as delineating search terms, beginning and refining search results, creating preliminary statistics from the data, and performing data evaluation. Scopus database was selected as the primary source, and VOSviewer software was used to visualize author networks, country affiliations, journal affiliations, and keyword associations. The analysis was conducted on January 16th, 2023, and yielded a total of 855 documents spanning the period from 1993 to 2022. Studies on ACS showed an annual increase, but it has not yet reached a mature stage. United States leads the world in terms of the highest number of publications, h-index, citations, and the involvement of renowned authors and organizations. Through an analysis of less frequently used keywords, this study identified potential themes for future investigation, including histopathology, biological markers, interleukin 6, alanine aminotransferase, early diagnosis, scoring systems, the severity of illness indices, clinical practices, patient monitoring, preoperative evaluations, minimally invasive surgery, inter-method comparisons, multicenter studies, follow-up investigations, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. While publications in ACS journals are crucial, they alone are not exhaustive, necessitating further research.

Acute necrotizing pancreatitis is a serious pancreatic injury with limited effective treatments. This study aims to investigate the therapeutic effects of hesperidin on Larginine- induced acute pancreatitis and its potential targets.

The authors induced acute pancreatitis in mice by administering two hourly intraperitoneal injections of L-arginine-HCl, and evaluated the impact of hesperidin on pancreatic and lung tissues, plasma amylase activity, and myeloperoxidase content. Additionally, necrosis and mitochondrial function was tested in primary pancreatic acinar cells. The interactions between hesperidin and proteins involved in necrosis and mitochondrial dysfunction were further invested using in silico molecular docking and molecular dynamic simulations.

Hesperidin effectively ameliorated the severity of acute necrotizing pancreatitis by reducing plasma amylase, pancreatic MPO, serum IL-6 levels, pancreatic edema, inflammation, and pancreatic necrosis. Hesperidin also protected against acute pancreatitis-associated lung injury and prevented acinar cell necrosis, mitochondrial membrane potential loss, and ATP depletion. In addition, hesperidin exhibited a high binding affinity with SIRT1 and increased the protein levels of SIRT1. The SIRT1 inhibitor EX527 abolished the protective effect of hesperidin against necrosis in acinar cells.

These findings indicate that hesperidin alleviates the severity of acute necrotizing pancreatitis by activating SIRT1, which may provide insight into the mechanisms of natural compounds in treating AP. Hesperidin has potential as a therapeutic agent for acute necrotizing pancreatitis and provides a new approach for novel therapeutic strategies.

This comprehensive review aims to provide a practical guide for intensivists, focusing on enhancing patient care associated with nosocomial peritonitis (NP). It explores the epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of NP, a significant contributor to the mortality of surgical patients worldwide. NP is, per definition, a hospital-acquired condition and a consequence of gastrointestinal surgery or a complication of other diseases. NP, one of the most prevalent causes of sepsis in surgical Intensive Care Units (ICUs), is often associated with multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacteria and high mortality rates. Early clinical suspicion and the utilization of various diagnostic tools like biomarkers and imaging are of great importance. Microbiology is often complex, with antimicrobial resistance escalating in many parts of the world. Fungal peritonitis and its risk factors, diagnostic hurdles, and effective management approaches are particularly relevant in patients with NP. Contemporary antimicrobial strategies for treating NP are discussed, including drug resistance challenges and empirical antibiotic regimens. The importance of source control in intra-abdominal infection management, including surgical and non-surgical interventions, is also emphasized. A deeper exploration into the role of open abdomen treatment as a potential option for selected patients is proposed, indicating an area for further investigation. This review underscores the need for more research to advance the best treatment strategies for NP.

Dengue-associated complications, including dengue shock syndrome, severe respiratory distress, and pediatric acute liver failure (PALF), are associated with high mortality rates in patients with dengue. There is increasing prevalence of overweight and obesity among children worldwide. Obesity may activate inflammatory mediators, leading to increased capillary permeability and plasma leakage in patients with dengue. Several studies have shown a correlation between obesity and DSS, but did not include dengue fatality or PALF. Therefore, we hypothesized possible associations between obesity and critical dengue-associated clinical outcomes among PICU-admitted children with DSS, including dengue-related mortality, mechanical ventilation (MV) requirements, and dengue-associated PALF. The nutritional status of the participants was assessed using World Health Organization growth charts. A total of 858 participants with complete nutritional data were enrolled in this study. Obesity was significantly associated with risk of severe respiratory failure and MV support (odds ratio = 2.3, 95% CI: 1.31-4.06, P < .01); however, it was not associated with dengue-associated mortality or acute liver failure. Obese pediatric patients with DSS should be closely monitored for severe respiratory distress and the need for high-flow oxygenation support, particularly MV, soon after hospitalization.

Whilst obesity and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) have been reported to be associated with an increased risk of severe AP, the established predictive scoring systems have not yet encompassed the impact of obesity or visceral adiposity. In the acute setting, computed tomography (CT) is often performed to assess AP severity and associated complications. With the added benefit of quantifying body fat distribution, it can be opportunistically used to quantify visceral adiposity and assess its relationship with the course of AP. This systematic review identified fifteen studies evaluating the relationship between visceral adiposity measured on CT and the severity of presentations of acute pancreatitis from January 2000 to November 2022. The primary outcome was to assess the relationship between CT quantified VAT and AP severity. The secondary outcomes were to assess the impact of VAT on patients developing local and systemic complications associated with AP. Whilst ten studies showed there was a significant correlation between an increased VAT and AP severity, five studies found otherwise. The majority of current literature demonstrate a positive correlation between increased VAT and AP severity. CT quantification VAT is a promising prognostic indicator with the potential to guide initial management, prompt more aggressive treatment measures or earlier re-evaluation and to aid disease prognostication in patients with acute pancreatitis.

The open abdomen is an innovation that greatly improved surgical understanding of damage control, temporary abdominal closure, staged abdominal reconstruction, viscera and enteric fistula care, and abdominal wall reconstruction. This article provides an evidence-informed, expert, comprehensive narrative review of the open abdomen in trauma, acute care, and vascular and endovascular surgery.

A group of 12 international trauma, acute care, and vascular and endovascular surgery experts were invited to review current literature and important concepts surrounding the open abdomen.

The open abdomen may be classified using validated systems developed by a working group in 2009 and modified by the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome-The Abdominal Compartment Society in 2013. It may be indicated in major trauma, intra-abdominal sepsis, vascular surgical emergencies, and severe acute pancreatitis; to facilitate second look laparotomy or avoid or treat abdominal compartment syndrome; and when the abdominal wall cannot be safely closed. Temporary abdominal closure and staged abdominal reconstruction methods include a mesh/sheet, transabdominal wall dynamic fascial traction, negative pressure wound therapy, and hybrid negative pressure wound therapy and dynamic fascial traction. This last method likely has the highest primary fascial closure rates. Direct peritoneal resuscitation is currently an experimental strategy developed to improve primary fascial closure rates and reduce complications in those with an open abdomen. Primary fascial closure rates may be improved by early return to the operating room; limiting use of crystalloid fluids during the surgical interval; and preventing and/or treating intra-abdominal hypertension, enteric fistulae, and intra-abdominal collections after surgery. The majority of failures of primary fascial closure and enteroatmospheric fistula formation may be prevented using effective temporary abdominal closure techniques, providing appropriate resuscitation fluids and nutritional support, and closing the abdomen as early as possible.

Subsequent stages of the innovation of the open abdomen will likely involve the design and conduct of prospective studies to evaluate appropriate indications for its use and effectiveness and safety of the above components of open abdomen management.

We report the case of a 53-year-old male who developed polycompartment syndrome (PCS) secondary to cardiogenic shock. After suffering a cardiac arrest, a self-perpetuating cycle of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and vital organ damage led to abdominal compartment syndrome (AbCS), which then contributed to the precipitation of extremity compartment syndrome (CS) in bilateral thighs, legs, forearms, and hands. This report is followed by a review of the literature regarding the pathophysiology of this rare sequela of cardiogenic shock. While the progression from cardiogenic shock to AbCS and ultimately to PCS has been hypothesized, no prior case reports demonstrate this. Furthermore, this case suggests more generally that IAH may be a risk factor for extremity CS. Future studies should examine the potential interplay between IAH and extremity CS in patients at risk, such as polytrauma patients with tibial fractures.

Intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome are common with clinically significant consequences. We investigated the pathophysiological effects of raised IAP as part of a more extensive exploratory animal study. The study design included both pneumoperitoneum and mechanical intestinal obstruction models.

Forty-nine female swine were divided into six groups: a control group (Cr; n = 5), three pneumoperitoneum groups with IAPs of 20mmHg (Pn20; n = 10), 30mmHg (Pn30; n = 10), 40mmHg (Pn40; n = 10), and two mechanical intestinal occlusion groups with IAPs of 20mmHg (MIO20; n = 9) and 30mmHg (MIO30; n = 5).

There were significant changes (p<0.05) noted in all organ systems, most notably systolic blood pressure (SBP) (p<0.001), cardiac index (CI) (p = 0.003), stroke volume index (SVI) (p<0.001), mean pulmonary airway pressure (MPP) (p<0.001), compliance (p<0.001), pO2 (p = 0.003), bicarbonate (p = 0.041), hemoglobin (p = 0.012), lipase (p = 0.041), total bilirubin (p = 0.041), gastric pH (p<0.001), calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (p<0.001), and urine output (p<0.001). SVV increased progressively as the IAP increased with no obvious changes in intravascular volume status. There were no significant differences between the models regarding their impact on cardiovascular, respiratory, renal and gastrointestinal systems. However, significant differences were noted between the two models at 30mmHg, with MIO30 showing worse metabolic and hematological parameters, and Pn30 and Pn40 showing a more rapid rise in creatinine.

This study identified and quantified the impact of intra-abdominal hypertension at different pressures on several organ systems and highlighted the significance of even short-lived elevations. Two models of intra-abdominal pressure were used, with a mechanical obstruction model showing more rapid changes in metabolic and haematological changes. These may represent different underlying cellular and vascular pathophysiological processes, but this remains unclear.

In critically ill patients receiving KRT, high ultrafiltration rates and persistent fluid accumulation are associated with adverse outcomes. The purpose of this international survey was to evaluate current practices and evidence gaps related to fluid removal with KRT in critically ill patients.

This was a multinational, web-based survey distributed by seven networks comprising nephrologists and intensivists. Physicians involved in the care of critically ill patients were invited to complete a 39-question survey about fluid management practices on KRT. The survey was distributed from September 2021 to December 2021.

There were 757 respondents from 96 countries (response rate of 65%). Most respondents practiced adult medicine (89%) and worked in an academic center (69%). The majority (91%) reported aiming for a 0.5- to 2-L negative fluid balance per day when fluid removal is indicated, although there was important variability in what respondents considered a safe maximal target. Intensivists were more likely than nephrologists to use adjunct volume status assessment methods ( i.e. , ultrasound, hemodynamic markers, and intra-abdominal pressure), while nephrologists were more likely to deploy cointerventions aimed at improving tolerance to fluid removal ( i.e. , osmotic agents and low-temperature dialysate). There was a broad consensus that rapid decongestion should be prioritized when fluid accumulation is present, but the prevention of hypotension was also reported as a competing priority. A majority (77%) agreed that performing trials that compare fluid management strategies would be ethical and clinically relevant.

We have identified multiple areas of variability in current practice of fluid management for patients receiving KRT. Most nephrologists and intensivists agreed that several knowledge gaps related to fluid removal strategies should be investigated in future randomized controlled trials.

During septic shock, fluid therapy is aimed at increasing cardiac output and improving tissue oxygenation, but it poses two problems: it has inconsistent and transient efficacy, and it has many well-documented deleterious effects. We suggest that there is a place for its personalization according to the patient characteristics and the clinical situation, at all stages of circulatory failure. Regarding the choice of fluid for volume expansion, isotonic saline induces hyperchloremic acidosis, but only for very large volumes administered. We suggest that balanced solutions should be reserved for patients who have already received large volumes and in whom the chloremia is rising. The initial volume expansion, intended to compensate for the constant hypovolaemia in the initial phase of septic shock, cannot be adapted to the patient's weight only, as suggested by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign, but should also consider potential absolute hypovolemia induced by fluid losses. After the initial fluid infusion, preload responsiveness may rapidly disappear, and it should be assessed. The choice between tests used for this purpose depends on the presence or absence of mechanical ventilation, the monitoring in place and the risk of fluid accumulation. In non-intubated patients, the passive leg raising test and the mini-fluid challenge are suitable. In patients without cardiac output monitoring, tests like the tidal volume challenge, the passive leg raising test and the mini-fluid challenge can be used as they can be performed by measuring changes in pulse pressure variation, assessed through an arterial line. The mini-fluid challenge should not be repeated in patients who already received large volumes of fluids. The variables to assess fluid accumulation depend on the clinical condition. In acute respiratory distress syndrome, pulmonary arterial occlusion pressure, extravascular lung water and pulmonary vascular permeability index assess the risk of worsening alveolar oedema better than arterial oxygenation. In case of abdominal problems, the intra-abdominal pressure should be taken into account. Finally, fluid depletion in the de-escalation phase is considered in patients with significant fluid accumulation. Fluid removal can be guided by preload responsiveness testing, since haemodynamic deterioration is likely to occur in patients with a preload dependent state.

Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) is frequently present in the critically ill and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Conventionally, intermittent 'spot-check' manual measurements of bladder pressure in those perceived as high risk are used as surrogates for intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). True patterns of IAH remain unknown. We explored the incidence of IAH in cardiac surgery patients and describe the intra-and postoperative course of IAP using a novel, high frequency, automated bladder pressure measurement system. Sub-analysis of a prospective, multicenter, observational study (NCT04669548) conducted in three large academic medical centers. Continuous urinary output (CUO) and IAP measurements were observed using the Accuryn Monitoring System (Potrero Medical, Hayward, CA). Data collected included demographics, hemodynamic support, and high-frequency IAP and CUO. One Hundred Thirty-Seven cardiac surgery patients were analyzed intraoperatively and followed 48 h postoperatively in the intensive care unit. Median age was 66.4 [58.3, 72.0] years, and 61% were men. Median Foley catheter dwell time was 56.0 [46.8, 77.5] hours, and median baseline IAP was 6.3 [4.0, 8.1] mmHg. 93% (128/137) of patients were in IAH grade I, 82% (113/137) in grade II, 39% (53/137) in grade III, and 5% (7/137) in grade IV for at least 12 cumulative hours. For maximum consecutive duration of IAH, 84% (115/137) of patients spent at least 12 h in grade I, 62% (85/137) in grade II, 18% (25/137) in grade III, and 2% (3/137) in grade IV IAH. During the first 48 h after cardiac surgery, IAH is common and persistent. Improved and automated monitoring of IAP will increase the detection of IAH-which normally would remain undetected using traditional intermittent monitoring methods.

Fluid removal can reduce the burden of fluid overload after initial resuscitation. According to the Frank-Starling model, iatrogenic hypovolemia should induce a decrease in cardiac index. We hypothesized that inadequate refilling detected by haemoconcentration during fluid removal or an increase in cardiac index (CI) during passive leg raising (PLR) could predict CI decrease during mechanical fluid removal with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT).

We conducted a single-centre prospective diagnostic accuracy study. The primary objective was to investigate the diagnostic performance of plasma protein concentration variations in detecting a CI decrease ≥ 12% during mechanical fluid removal. Secondary objective was to assess other predictive factors of CI change. The attending physician prescribed a fluid removal challenge consisting of a mechanical fluid removal challenge of 500 mL for one hour. Plasma protein concentration, haemoglobin level, PLR and transpulmonary thermodilution were done before and after the fluid removal challenge.

We included 69 adult patients between December 2016 and April 2020. Sixteen patients had a significant CI decrease (23% [95% CI 14-35]). Haemoconcentration and PLR before fluid removal challenge or CI trending failed to predict CI decrease.

Haemoconcentration variables, preload dependence status and CI trending failed to predict CI decrease during fluid removal challenge.

Measuring intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is important for management of patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). Intra-bladder pressure (IBP) is an indirect index that reflects IAP, but measuring techniques vary. We sought to optimise IBP measuring techniques in predicted SAP patients.

Predicted SAP patients consecutively admitted between June 2018 and January 2020 were scrutinised. Eligible patients had their IBP monitored for the first 72 h at 6-h intervals, and were then sequentially allocated into three research scenarios: (1) in the supine position along with head of bed elevation(HoBE)of 0, 15 and 30° at various points including the iliac crest the midaxillary line, pubic symphysis, and right atrium level, instilled with 25 mL normal saline (NS) at room temperature (RT); (2) NS instillation volume from 0, 10, 25, 40-50 mL at the iliac crest with HoBE15 at RT; and (3) NS instillation (25 mL) at either RT or 37 °C with HoBE15.

The dynamic IBP values measured at the pubic symphysis and iliac crest were fairly similar between HoBE0 and HoBE15 (all P > 0.05), but greatly increased at HoBE30 (all P < 0.01). IBP was significantly increased with escalating instillation volumes of NS (all P < 0.01 versus 0 mL NS), while there was no significant difference between 25 mL and 10 mL (P = 0.055). IBP was similar between NS at RT and under 37 °C (P = 0.643).

In predicted SAP patients, measuring IBP at the iliac crest with HoBE15 after instilling 10 mL of NS seems to be appropriate for monitoring IAP.

Objective.Tissue internal pressure, such as interstitial fluid pressure in solid tumors and intramuscular pressure in compartment syndrome, is closely related to the pathological state of tissues. It is of great diagnostic value to measure and/or monitor the internal pressure of targeted tissues. Because most of the current methods for measuring tissue pressure are invasive, noninvasive methods are highly desired. In this study, we developed a noninvasive method for qualitative assessment of tissue internal pressure based on a combination of two ultrasound elasticity imaging methods: strain imaging and shear wave elasticity imaging.Approach.The method was verified through experimental investigation using two tissue-mimicking phantoms each having an inclusion confined by a membrane, in which hydrostatic pressures can be applied and maintained. To examine the sensitivity of the elasticity imaging methods to pressure variation, strain ratio and shear modulus ratio (SMR) between the inclusion and background of phantom were obtained.Main results.The results first experimentally prove that pressure, in addition to elasticity, is a contrast mechanism of strain imaging, and further demonstrate that a comparative analysis of strain ratio and SMR is an effective method for noninvasive tissue internal pressure detection.Significance.This work provides a new perspective in interpreting the strain ratio data in medical diagnosis, and it also provides a noninvasive alternative for assessing tissue internal pressure, which could be valuable for the diagnosis of pressure-related diseases.

To determine physicians' knowledge of abdominal compartment syndrome and intra-abdominal hypertension in Saudi Arabia.

A cross-sectional online survey study was conducted on physicians in Saudi Arabia between March and August 2022. A previously developed questionnaire was adapted and used in this study. The survey instrument investigated the knowledge and management of intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome among physicians. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of being knowledgeable about abdominal compartment syndrome and intra-abdominal hypertension.

A total of 266 physicians participated in this study. Around one-fifth (21.8%) the study participants were ICU physicians and 25.0% reported that they practice internal medicine. Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and the impact of increased intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) on organ function were terms that the majority of research participants (70.3%) reported they were familiar with. A similar percentage (73.7%) reported that they are familiar with abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). Around 43.0% of the study participants reported that they do not know how to measure IAP. The most frequently reported (13.5%) intervention in the treatment of IAH and ACS was the use of inotropes or vasopressors. The study participants showed a weak level of knowledge of ACS and IAH with a median score of 3.00 (IQR: 5.00-2.00), which represents 27.3% of the maximum attainable score. Physicians working at hospitals with 20-50 ICU beds were 41.0% (odds ratio: 0.59 (CI: 0.37-0.96)) less likely to be knowledgeable about intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome (p≤0.05).

Physicians demonstrated a low level of IAP and ACS knowledge. To increase the safety of medical practices and enhance clinical outcomes for patients, awareness should be raised about the proper diagnosis and management of IAP and ACS. Future research should focus on developing effective educational strategies to improve physicians' understanding of IAP and ACS.

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a disease spectrum ranging from mild to severe with an unpredictable natural course. Majority of cases (80%) are mild and self-limiting. However, severe AP (SAP) has a mortality risk of up to 30%. Establishing aetiology and risk stratification are essential pillars of clinical care. Idiopathic AP is a diagnosis of exclusion which should only be used after extended investigations fail to identify a cause. Tenets of management of mild AP include pain control and management of aetiology to prevent recurrence. In SAP, patients should be resuscitated with goal-directed fluid therapy using crystalloids and admitted to critical care unit. Routine prophylactic antibiotics have limited clinical benefit and should not be given in SAP. Patients able to tolerate oral intake should be given early enteral nutrition rather than nil by mouth or parenteral nutrition. If unable to tolerate per-orally, nasogastric feeding may be attempted and routine post-pyloric feeding has limited evidence of clinical benefit. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogram should be selectively performed in patients with biliary obstruction or suspicion of acute cholangitis. Delayed step-up strategy including percutaneous retroperitoneal drainage, endoscopic debridement, or minimal-access necrosectomy are sufficient in most SAP patients. Patients should be monitored for diabetes mellitus and pseudocyst.

In preparing the Japanese (JPN) guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis 2021, the committee focused the issues raised by the results of nationwide epidemiological survey in 2016 in Japan.

In addition to a systematic search using the previous JPN guidelines, papers published from January 2014 to September 2019 were searched for the contents to be covered by the guidelines based on the concept of GRADE system.

Thirty-six clinical questions (CQ) were prepared in 15 subject areas. Based on the facts that patients diagnosed with severe disease by both Japanese prognostic factor score and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) grade had a high fatality rate and that little prognosis improvement after 2 weeks of disease onset was not obtained, we emphasized the importance of Pancreatitis Bundles, which were shown to be effective in improving prognosis, and the CQ sections for local pancreatic complications had been expanded to ensure adoption of a step-up approach. Furthermore, on the facts that enteral nutrition for severe acute pancreatitis was not started early within 48 h of admission and that unnecessary prophylactic antibiotics was used in almost all cases, we emphasized early enteral nutrition in small amounts even if gastric feeding is used and no prophylactic antibiotics are administered in mild pancreatitis.

All the members of the committee have put a lot of effort into preparing the extensively revised guidelines in the hope that more people will have a common understanding and that better medical care will be spread.

General pathophysiological mechanisms regarding associations between fluid administration and intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) are evident, but specific effects of type, amount, and timing of fluids are less clear.

This review aims to summarize current knowledge on associations between fluid administration and intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and fluid management in patients at risk of intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS).

We performed a structured literature search from 1950 until May 2021 to identify evidence of associations between fluid management and intra-abdominal pressure not limited to any specific study or patient population. Findings were summarized based on the following information: general concepts of fluid management, physiology of fluid movement in patients with intra-abdominal hypertension, and data on associations between fluid administration and IAH.

We identified three randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 38 prospective observational studies, 29 retrospective studies, 18 case reports in adults, two observational studies and 10 case reports in children, and three animal studies that addressed associations between fluid administration and IAH. Associations between fluid resuscitation and IAH were confirmed in most studies. Fluid resuscitation contributes to the development of IAH. However, patients with IAH receive more fluids to manage the effect of IAH on other organ systems, thereby causing a vicious cycle. Timing and approach to de-resuscitation are of utmost importance, but clear indicators to guide this decision-making process are lacking. In selected cases, only surgical decompression of the abdomen can stop deterioration and prevent further morbidity and mortality.

Current evidence confirms an association between fluid resuscitation and secondary IAH, but optimal fluid management strategies for patients with IAH remain controversial.

Burn injuries carry an increased risk of intra-abdominal hypertension and are an independent risk factor for abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). ACS is most commonly due to large volume resuscitation. The added concern of ACS can complicate resuscitative efforts. Early monitoring for ACS (intra-abdominal pressure > 20 mm Hg with associated new-onset organ dysfunction) and performing prudent decompressive laparotomies are important factors to keep in mind when treating large surface area burn patients. This case report describes the hospitalization of a 60-year-old male who presented with 45% full-thickness (FT) total body surface area (TBSA) and inhalation injury. On arrival to the emergency department (ED), he had received a total of 6 L of intravenous lactate Ringers, and vasopressors were initiated due to hypotension. During the tertiary examination it was noted that there was increased difficulty ventilating the patient, and his abdomen was becoming increasingly distended and tense. His intra-abdominal pressure was measured in the ED and found to be elevated at 32 mm Hg. The findings were suggestive of ACS and a decompressive laparotomy was performed in the ED. Upon entering the abdominal cavity, the abdominal contents extruded through the incision and diffuse venous congestion and gastric distention were noted. Items commonly found in operating rooms (Top-Draper® warmer drape, Kerlix rolls, Jackson-Pratt suction drains, and 3M® Ioban sterile antimicrobial incise drape) were utilized to maintain an open abdomen where abdominal contents could easily be observed and to prevent delay in performing a decompressive laparotomy. Here we describe a patient with 45% FT TBSA and inhalation injuries requiring an emergent decompressive laparotomy for ACS after only 6 L of lactate Ringers were administered. This highlights the importance of early monitoring for ACS and the ease of performing a decompressive laparotomy with commonly found items in the ED and operating rooms.

To assess whether intraabdominal hypertension (IAH) may influence kidney failure as well as mortality.

This post-hoc analysis of two databases (IROI and iSOFA study) tested the independent association between IAH and kidney failure. Mortality was assessed using four prespecified groups (IAH present, kidney failure present, IAH and kidney failure present and no IAH or kidney failure present).

Of 825 critically ill patients, 302 (36.6%) developed kidney failure and 192 (23.7%) died during the first 90 days. Only 'Cumulative days with IAH grade II or more' was significantly associated with kidney failure (OR 1.29 (1.08-1.55), p = 0.003) while 'cumulative days with IAH grade I or more' (p = 0.135) or highest daily IAP (p = 0.062) was not. IAH combined with kidney failure was independently associated with 90-day mortality (OR 2.20 (1.20-4.05), p = 0.011), which was confirmed for higher grades of IAH (grade II or more) alone (OR 2.14 (1.07-4.30), p = 0.032) and combined with kidney failure (OR 3.25 (1.72-6.12), p < 0.001).

This study suggest that duration as well as higher grades of IAH are associated with kidney failure and may increase mortality.

To provide guidelines for the management of the intensive care patient with severe acute pancreatitis.

A consensus committee of 22 experts was convened. A formal conflict-of-interest (COI) policy was developed at the beginning of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guideline construction process was conducted independently of any industrial funding (i.e. pharmaceutical, medical devices). The authors were required to follow the rules of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE®) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence. The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence were emphasised.

The most recent SFAR and SNFGE guidelines on the management of the patient with severe pancreatitis were published in 2001. The literature now is sufficient for an update. The committee studied 14 questions within 3 fields. Each question was formulated in a PICO (Patients Intervention Comparison Outcome) format and the relevant evidence profiles were produced. The literature review and recommendations were made according to the GRADE® methodology.

The experts' synthesis work and their application of the GRADE® method resulted in 24 recommendations. Among the formalised recommendations, 8 have high levels of evidence (GRADE 1+/-) and 12 have moderate levels of evidence (GRADE 2+/-). For 4 recommendations, the GRADE method could not be applied, resulting in expert opinions. Four questions did not find any response in the literature. After one round of scoring, strong agreement was reached for all the recommendations.

There was strong agreement among experts for 24 recommendations to improve practices for the management of intensive care patients with severe acute pancreatitis.

Elevated intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is a known cause of increased morbidity and mortality among critically ill patients. Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome can lead to rapid deterioration of organ function and the development of multiple organ failure. Raised IAP affects every system and main organ in the human body. Even marginally sustained IAH results in malperfusion and may disrupt the process of recovery. Yet, despite being so common, this potentially lethal condition often goes unnoticed. In 2004, the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome, an international multidisciplinary consensus group, was formed to provide unified definitions, improve understanding and promote research in this field. Simple, reliable and nearly costless standardized methods of non-invasive measurement and monitoring of bladder pressure allow early recognition of IAH and timely optimized management. The correct, structured approach to treatment can have a striking effect and fully restore homeostasis. In recent years, significant progress has been made in this area with the contribution of surgeons, internal medicine specialists and anesthesiologists. Our review focuses on recent advances in order to present the complex underlying pathophysiology and guidelines concerning diagnosis, monitoring and treatment of this life-threatening condition.

Increased intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is common among post-surgical patients and may cause organ dysfunction. However, its impact after kidney transplantation on early postoperative complications and graft recovery remains unclear. We designed a prospective, observational cohort study to describe the prevalence and determinants of IAP, as well as its effect on delayed graft function, postoperative complications, and graft recovery. IAP was measured in 205 kidney transplant recipients every 8 h during the first 72 h after surgery using the urinary bladder technique. Intra-abdominal hypertension was defined as IAP ≥ 12 mmHg. Patients were followed for 6 months or until graft failure/death. Mean IAP was 12 ± 3.3 mmHg within the first 24 h. 78% of subjects presented with intra-abdominal hypertension during the first 72 h. Increased IAP was associated with higher renal resistive index [r = 0.213; P = 0.003] and lower urine output [r =  - 0.237; P < 0.001]. 72 h mean IAP was an independent risk factor for delayed graft function [OR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.13-1.51], postoperative complications [OR: 1.17; 95% CI: 1.03-1.33], and absence of graft function recovery [HR for graft function recovery: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.88-0.99]. Increased IAP was highly prevalent after transplantation and was independently associated with delayed graft function, postoperative complications, and absence of graft function recovery. Routine IAP monitoring should be considered post-transplantation to facilitate early recognition of relevant complications.

The clinical efficacy and timing of continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) in the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) remain uncertain. In this prospective cohort study, patients with SAP were classified according to intra-abdominal pressure (IAP).

Seventy-four patients with SAP admitted to the intensive care unit were randomly divided into group A (IAP ≥20 mm Hg) and group B (with IAP ≤20 mm Hg). Then, according to whether CVVH was administered or not, groups A and B were divided into 4 subgroups: group A1 and B1 (non-CVVH treatment), group A2 and B2 (CVVH treatment). Changes in clinical and laboratory indicators were recorded before and on the seventh day after treatment, and clinical outcomes were analyzed.

Before treatment, there was no significant difference in general conditions between subgroups A1 and A2, and between subgroups B1 and B2. After CVVH treatment, the indicators recorded in group A2 were significantly improved compared to those in group A1 (P < .05). In group A2, the 28 day operation rate was lower (P < .05), as mechanical ventilation, gastric decompression, and intensive care unit treatment time were shorter (P < .05). However, there was no statistically significant difference in any of the above indicators between subgroups B (P > .05). Groups A2 and B2 had more days of negative fluid balance within 1 week of admission than groups A1 and B1 (P < .05).

For SAP, patients with IAP ≥20 mm Hg can benefit from treatment with CVVH, but for patients with IAP ≤20 mm Hg, the efficacy is not clear, and monitoring IAP may be an indicator to decide whether or when to initiate CVVH. Negative fluid balance caused by CVVH treatment may be one of the reasons for the benefit of this group of patients.

Intra-abdominal hypertension is frequently present in critically ill patients and is an independent predictor for mortality. In this narrative review, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of current insights into intra-abdominal pressure monitoring, intra-abdominal hypertension, and abdominal compartment syndrome. The focus of this review is on the pathophysiology, risk factors and outcome of intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome, and on therapeutic strategies, such as non-operative management, surgical decompression, and management of the open abdomen. Finally, future steps are discussed, including propositions of what a future guideline should focus on.

Pathological intra-abdominal pressure is a continuum ranging from mild intra-abdominal pressure elevation without clinically significant adverse effects to substantial increase in intra-abdominal pressure with serious consequences to all organ systems. Intra-abdominal pressure monitoring should be performed in all patients at risk of intra-abdominal hypertension. Although continuous intra-abdominal pressure monitoring is feasible, this is currently not standard practice. There are a number of effective non-operative medical interventions that may be performed early in the patient's course to reduce intra-abdominal pressure and decrease the need for surgical decompression. Abdominal decompression can be life-saving when abdominal compartment syndrome is refractory to non-operative treatment and should be performed expeditiously. The objectives of open abdomen management are to prevent fistula and to achieve delayed fascial closure at the earliest possible time. There is still a lot to learn and change. The 2013 World Society of Abdominal Compartment Syndrome guidelines should be updated and multicentre studies should evaluate the effect of intra-abdominal hypertension treatment on patient outcome.

An elevated intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) above 12 mmHg is a pathological finding in critically ill patients. IAP are classified into different degrees of intra-abdominal hypertension and, in the presence of associated organ failure, as abdominal compartment syndrome. Both disease entities represent an underestimated factor in intensive care patients and are associated with increased mortality and prolonged intensive care and hospital stay. The measurement of intra-abdominal pressure in critically ill patients in intensive care units is not widely established and there is often considerable uncertainty regarding measurement conditions and methods. If risk factors are present, intra-abdominal pressure should be monitored every 4 hours. Bladder pressure measurement is the gold standard for determining intra-abdominal pressure. The measurement is a non-invasive, cost-effective, easy to perform bedside and safe method for the patient.

Severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) is a life-threatening disease. Fluid Resuscitation Via Colon (FRVC) may be a complementary therapy for early controlled fluid resuscitation. But its clinical application has not been reported. This study aims to explore the impact of FRVC on SAP. All SAP patients with the first onset within 72 h admitted to the hospital were included from January 2014 to December 2018 through electronic databases of Ruijin hospital and were divided into FRVC group (n = 103) and non-FRVC group (n = 78). The clinical differences before and after the therapy between the two groups were analyzed. Of the 181 patients included in the analysis, the FRVC group received more fluid volume and reached the endpoint of blood volume expansion ahead of the non-FRVC group. After the early fluid resuscitation, the inflammation indicators in the FRVC group were lower. The rate of mechanical ventilation and the incidence of hypernatremia also decreased significantly. Using pure water for FRVC was more helpful to reduce hypernatremia. However, Kaplan-Meier 90-day survival between the two groups showed no difference. These results suggest that the combination of FRVC might benefit SAP patients in the early stage of fluid resuscitation, but there is no difference between the prognosis of SAP patients and that of conventional fluid resuscitation. Further prospective study is needed to evaluate the effect of FRVC on SAP patients.

Fluid overload (FO) after resuscitation is frequent and contributes to adverse outcomes among postinjury open abdomen (OA) patients. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a promising tool for monitoring fluid status and FO. Therefore, we sought to investigate the efficacy of BIA-directed fluid resuscitation among OA patients.

A pragmatic, prospective, randomized, observer-blind, single-center trial was performed for all trauma patients requiring OA between January 2013 and December 2017 to a national referral center. A total of 140 postinjury OA patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either a BIA-directed fluid resuscitation (BIA) protocol that included fluid administration with monitoring of hemodynamic parameters and different degrees of interventions to achieve a negative fluid balance targeting the hydration level (HL) measured by BIA or a traditional fluid resuscitation (TRD) in which clinicians determined the fluid resuscitation regimen according to traditional parameters during 30 days of ICU management. The primary outcome was the 30-day primary fascial closure (PFC) rate. The secondary outcomes included the time to PFC, postoperative 7-day cumulative fluid balance (CFB) and adverse events within 30 days after OA. The Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test were utilized for PFC after OA. A generalized linear regression model for the time to PFC and CFB was built.

A total of 134 patients completed the trial (BIA, n = 66; TRD, n = 68). The BIA patients were significantly more likely to achieve PFC than the TRD patients (83.33% vs. 55.88%, P < 0.001). In the BIA group, the time to PFC occurred earlier than that of the TRD group by an average of 3.66 days (P < 0.001). Additionally, the BIA group showed a lower postoperative 7-day CFB by an average of 6632.80 ml (P < 0.001) and fewer complications.

Among postinjury OA patients in the ICU, the use of BIA-guided fluid resuscitation resulted in a higher PFC rate and fewer severe complications than the traditional fluid resuscitation strategy.