Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists have recently proven to be an effective treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, these drugs are also known to carry a significant risk of drug-induced pancreatitis. The purpose of this study is to determine whether or not GLP-1-associated pancreatitis risk is dose-dependent. That is, we aim to determine whether the risk of developing pancreatitis increases with the administered dose of GLP-1 agonist or not.

We conduct a retrospective case control study using data taken from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) database. Participants are included if they reported an adverse effect of GLP-1 agonist and reported the cumulative dose of drug administered. We measure the odds ratio of developing pancreatitis between patients who have taken a large cumulative dose of GLP-1 agonist and those with a low cumulative dose of GLP-1 agonist. The odds ratio of different GLP-1 agonists are combined via a random effects model.

Patients with a high cumulative dose of GLP-1 agonist are associated with a higher risk of developing drug-induced pancreatitis associated with GLP-1 agonists, indicated by a statistically significant odds ratio. Furthermore, the odds ratio increases as the cumulative dose increases.

GLP-1 agonists are associated with significant pancreatitis risk which increases with larger cumulative doses.

Cardiometabolic diseases, particularly type 2 diabetes (T2D) and cardiovascular disease (CVD), represent leading global health challenges with rising incidence and prevalence. Despite strong evidence supporting the benefits of sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) in managing CVD risk in T2D, these therapies remain underutilized.

This review discusses the present state of SGLT2i and GLP-1 RA usage, emphasizing barriers to their adoption, including clinical inertia, high costs, and misconceptions about injectable therapies. The literature search was conducted using PubMed, UpToDate, major society journals, and clinical guidelines. Information was gathered from cohort studies, survey reports, randomized controlled trials, and meta-analyses that examine the effectiveness and challenges surrounding these treatments.

Addressing the underuse of SGLT2i and GLP-1 RA requires a multifaceted approach. Key strategies include improving prescriber awareness, reducing out-of-pocket costs, fostering interdisciplinary collaboration, and leveraging digital health tools. Implementation science has shown promise in enhancing therapy uptake. Future efforts must integrate these therapies into value-based care models to ensure timely, equitable access, ultimately reducing cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality in high-risk T2D populations.

Semaglutide is a glucagon-like-peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) that is approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity. Common adverse drug reactions (ADR) of semaglutide include nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, constipation, and diarrhea, which are often dose-dependent in nature. Select ADRs that are less common, but may result in more significant concerns, include development of acute pancreatitis, gallbladder and biliary tract diseases, acute kidney injury, and ileus. Limited clinical literature exists at present regarding management of GLP-1 RA overdose, particularly for subcutaneous semaglutide. This report describes an 80-year-old male with T2DM and mild cognitive impairment who self-administered subcutaneous semaglutide 1 mg daily over the span of 7 days. The patient denied any ADRs, including those related to gastrointestinal upset or hypoglycemia. Blood glucose readings from the patient's glucometer ranged from 100 - 180 mg/dL. The patient declined to present for medical evaluation until 5 weeks after the overdose incident. No clinically significant changes were noted in his renal function, hepatic function, nor his pancreatic enzymes upon laboratory follow-up. Published reports concerning GLP-1 RA overdoses describe mixed presentation of patients following such events. Treatments detailed in the case reports included primarily supportive care measures. Based on the mechanism of action of GLP-1 RAs, and those case reports detailed, we recommend close monitoring and supportive care in the form of providing antiemetics, correcting fluid and electrolyte imbalances from gastrointestinal losses, and monitoring for hypoglycemia in the event of an overdose.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are increasingly prescribed for glycemic control and weight loss management in type 2 diabetes. Their use, however, is associated with a wide range of gastrointestinal adverse effects like nausea, vomiting, and abdominal discomfort. This case report presents a 59-year-old woman with a previous Roux-en-Y gastric bypass who was prescribed semaglutide, and subsequently developed intussusception with small bowel obstruction and chemical pancreatitis. The patient presented to the emergency department with nausea, vomiting, and epigastric pain. The patient's laboratory and radiographic studies revealed a long segment of small bowel intussusception, resulting in a small bowel obstruction and likely chemical pancreatitis. Laparoscopic surgical intervention was required, ultimately converted to a laparotomy for successful reduction of the intussusception. This case report underscores a potential complication that may be seen in patients prescribed GLP-1RAs with prior gastric Roux-en-Y surgeries. The adverse effect is likely attributable to altered gastrointestinal motility and delayed gastric emptying, mechanisms that may be exacerbated by the combination of bariatric-induced anatomical changes and the pharmacological actions of GLP-1RAs. Given the increasing prevalence of GLP-1RA use, emergency medicine clinicians must remain vigilant for these potential serious adverse effects, particularly in patients with complex gastrointestinal histories to ensure timely diagnosis and intervention.

GLP-1 receptor agonists, such as semaglutide (Ozempic) and tirzepatide (Monjaro), have gained significant popularity for obesity management, but concerns have arisen about their potential link to thyroid cancer. This study investigates the association between thyroid cancer and weight-loss medications.

A disproportionality analysis was conducted using data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from 2004 to Q1 2024. Reporting odds ratios (RORs) were used to identify associations between thyroid cancer and weight-loss drugs, including anti-diabetic medications.

Significant positive associations with thyroid cancer were found for GLP-1 receptor agonists: semaglutide (ROR = 7.61, 95% CI: 6.37-9.08), dulaglutide (ROR = 3.59, 95% CI: 3.03-4.27), liraglutide (ROR = 15.59, 95% CI: 13.94-17.44) and tirzepatide (ROR = 2.09, 95% CI: 1.51-2.89). A weak inverse association was observed for metformin (ROR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.36-0.93). No significant associations were found for other drugs, such as topiramate, dapagliflozin and insulin glargine.

The study, based on data from the FAERS database, suggests a potential association between GLP-1 receptor agonists and an increased thyroid cancer risk. These findings underscore the importance of further research and continuous safety monitoring when prescribing these medications for obesity management.

Obesity is a global epidemic. The FDA has approved glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists such as Liraglutide, Semaglutide, and the GLP-1/gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) dual agonist Tirzepatide for the treatment of obesity. Clinical trials of GLP-1/GIP/glucagon(GCG) triple agonists are ongoing. This study compared the efficacy and safety profiles of different GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) for weight reduction and explored the related influencing factors, providing quantitative information for the development of GLP-1RAs and their clinical use.

This systematic review of public databases included placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials of GLP-1RAs. Time-course, dose-response, and covariate models were used to describe the efficacy characteristics and influencing factors of different GLP-1RAs. Subgroup analyses were performed to explore efficacy differences in receptor specificity. Meta-analyses compared the incidence of adverse event and dropout rates among different GLP-1RAs.

Fifty-five studies involving 16,269 participants and 12 GLP-1RAs were included. Six drugs showed significant dose-response relationships. The maximum weight reduction effect ranged from 4.25 kg (Liraglutide) to 22.6 kg (Retatrutide). Reported onset times ranged from 6.4 weeks (Orforglipron) to 19.5 weeks (Tirzepatide). At 52 weeks, weight reduction effects were 7.03 kg, 11.07 kg, and 24.15 kg for mono-agonists, dual-agonists, and tri-agonists, respectively. There was a significant negative correlation in the exponential pattern between age and weight reduction effect, whereas baseline weight and BMI had no significant impact. Common adverse events of GLP-1RAs, reported in the literature include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and constipation, with a significantly higher incidence of nausea than that of placebo.

This study provides a quantitative evaluation of the efficacy and safety of GLP-1RAs and offers valuable insights into the assessment of new drugs for weight reduction.

Obesity and overweight have become increasingly significant conditions, affecting more than 70% of the adult population in the United States. These conditions are caused by a combination of factors, including genetic, behavioral, environmental, and medical influences. Obesity is a major risk factor for cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. A comprehensive treatment plan for individuals with obesity must recognize the chronic nature of the condition and offer strategies for weight reduction and long-term cardiometabolic benefits. Over the past several decades, multiple therapeutic options have been implemented to address weight loss, appetite regulation, and caloric expenditure, with the goal of reducing the burden of obesity and improving cardiovascular outcomes. Pharmacological treatment of obesity has focused primarily on the central regulation of appetite and food intake behavior. The introduction of incretin agonists for obesity treatment has ushered in a new era of cardiometabolic health, with a multitargeted mechanism that achieves weight loss, glycemic control, decreased cardiovascular mortality, and other metabolic benefits. This review explores the current pharmacological options and the future of obesity treatment.

Incretin-based therapies, including glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, are essential treatments in diabetes management due to their efficacy in glycemic control and the additional benefits of GLP-1 RAs, which include cardiovascular and renal protection. However, concerns about potential associations with biliary disorders necessitate ongoing pharmacovigilance. This study analyzes the link between these drugs and biliary adverse events (AEs) using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to enhance clinical safety.

We extracted AE data for GLP-1 RAs and DPP-4 inhibitors from FAERS between Q1 2013 and Q1 2024 using OpenVigil 2.1. Analytical methods such as the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Empirical Bayesian Geometric Mean (EBGM) were employed to assess AE risk.

A search of biliary disorders by standard MedDRA analytical queries (SMQs) identified 2,215 reports of biliary AEs, with 1,709 related to GLP-1 RAs and 506 to DPP-4 inhibitors. DPP-4 inhibitors showed a significant association with biliary disorders (ROR, 3.09; 95% CI, 2.83-3.37), particularly sitagliptin (ROR, 3.46; 95% CI, 3.13-3.83). Although the overall association for GLP-1 RAs (ROR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.52-1.68) was not significant, semaglutide (ROR, 4.06; 95% CI, 3.76-4.39) and liraglutide (ROR, 3.88; 95% CI, 3.50-4.29) indicated a notable risk. The SMQ subgroup analyses of sitagliptin, semaglutide, and liraglutide with the SMQ subgroup categories of "biliary tract disorders," "gallbladder related disorders," "gallstone related disorders," and "infectious biliary disorders' demonstrated a statistically significant correlation. Notably, liraglutide, alogliptin, sitagliptin, and linagliptin were linked to "biliary malignant tumors" with statistical significance. The proportion of serious outcomes was higher for DPP-4 inhibitors (n = 389, 76.88%) compared to GLP-1 RAs (n = 881, 51.55%).

DPP-4 inhibitors are potentially linked to biliary disorders, warranting vigilance. While the overall association for GLP-1 RAs was not significant, specific drugs like semaglutide, liraglutide, and sitagliptin showed concerning signals, suggesting a need for heightened awareness among clinicians regarding the risk of biliary AEs.

Traditionally, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) management has focused on continuous positive airway pressure therapy, oral appliances, and in some cases, surgical interventions. However, these treatments do not directly address the underlying metabolic issues contributing to OSA. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), originally developed for type 2 diabetes management, have demonstrated substantial efficacy in promoting weight.

This review aims to summarize the potential impact of liraglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide in managing obese patients with OSA.

The introduction of GLP-1 RAs has gained attention not only for their ability to produce significant and sustained weight loss but also for their potential to improve OSA symptoms by reducing fat deposition around the upper airway and decreasing systemic inflammation. Emerging clinical trials suggest that GLP-1 RAs may enhance traditional OSA treatments, offering an integrated approach targeting the root cause of obesity in OSA. Additionally, GLP-1 RAs may provide benefits for other obesity-related comorbidities, including hypertension and cardiovascular disease, which are commonly associated with OSA. The future integration of GLP-1 RAs into OSA treatment protocols could mark a paradigm shift toward more comprehensive management strategies, ultimately improving patient outcomes in this complex patient population.

The association between biliary disorders with weight reduction enhanced by GLP-1RAs was observed frequently, nevertheless, the relative risk of the clinically relevant cholelithiasis was not specified clearly among different GLP-1RAs.

308 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) were recruited and divided into 4 groups; liraglutide, dulaglutide, semaglutide, versus control group; comprised of 69, 76, 71, and 92, respectively. Clinical history, examination, laboratory, and radiology tests were implemented.

Cholelithiasis significantly associates GLP1-RAs (p = 0.033). Overall cholelithiasis was evident in 31.2% of our participants. Symptomatic cholelithiasis prevails in 60.4% of patients with cholelithiasis. Symptomatic complicated cholelithiasis prevailed in 33.3%; distributed in 28.1%, 28.1%, 21.9%, and 21.9% in liraglutide, semaglutide, dulaglutide, and control groups, respectively. Meanwhile, symptomatic uncomplicated cholelithiasis was observed in 27.1%; distributed in 34.6%, 30.8%, 15.4%, and 19.2% in Liraglutide, semaglutide, dulaglutide, and control groups, respectively. Asymptomatic cholelithiasis was noted in 36.8%, 21.1%, 10.5%, and 31.6% of patients with dulaglutide, semaglutide, liraglutide, and control groups, respectively. Specifically, 81.1%, 68%, and 44% of patients with liraglutide, semaglutide, and dulaglutide experienced symptomatic cholelithiasis. The relative risk of cholelithiasis was 1.2, 1.3, and 1.4 in liraglutide, dulaglutide, and semaglutide with number needed to harm of 17.25, 14.69, and 10.96, respectively. The relative risk of symptomatic cholelithiasis was 1.6, 0.9, and 1.4 in liraglutide, dulaglutide, and semaglutide with number needed to harm of 3.14, 16.67, and 5.56, respectively.

Liraglutide was associated with the highest risk of clinically relevant cholelithiasis than semaglutide, and dulaglutide in patients with T2D.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists and the dual GLP-1- and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor co-agonist tirzepatide (referred to here collectively as "GLP-1-based therapy") are incretin-based therapies being used increasingly in the management of both type 2 diabetes and obesity. They are now recognized to have beneficial effects beyond improved glycemic control and weight loss, including cardiovascular and renal protection. GLP-1-based therapy also slows gastric emptying, which has benefits (lowering postprandial glucose), but also potential risks (eg, hypoglycemia in individuals on insulin or sulphonylurea therapy). Their effects on the gallbladder may also be beneficial, contributing to reducing postprandial triglycerides, but they also potentially increase the risk of biliary disease. In this review, we summarize the effects of GLP-1 and incretin-based therapeutics on gastric, biliary and small intestinal function. An improved understanding of these effects will optimize the use of these drugs.

Recent clinical trials using synthetic incretin hormones, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor agonists have demonstrated that these treatments ameliorated many complications related to obesity, emphasizing the significant impact of body weight on overall health. Incretins are enteroendocrine hormones secreted by gut endothelial cells triggered by nutrient ingestion. The phenomenon that oral ingestion of glucose elicits a much higher insulin secretion than intra-venous injection of equimolar glucose is known as the incretin effect. This also alludes to the thesis that food intake is the root cause of insulin resistance. Synthetic GLP-1 and GIP agonists have demonstrated unprecedented glucoregulation and body weight reduction. Also, randomized trials have shown their ability to prevent complications of obesity, including development of diabetes from prediabetes, reducing cardiovascular disease risks and renal complications in diabetic patients. Moreover, the benefits of these agonists persist among the patients who are already on metformin or insulin. The ultimate question is "Are these benefits of incretin agonism sustainable?" Chronic agonism of pancreatic β-cells may decrease the number of receptors and cause β-cell exhaustion, leading to β-cell failure. Unfortunately, the long-term effects of these drugs are unknown at the present because the longest duration in randomized trials is 3 years. Additionally, manipulation of the neurohormonal axis to control satiety and food intake may hinder the long-term sustainability of these treatments. In this review, we will discuss the incretins' mechanism of action, challenges, and future directions. We will briefly review other molecules involved in glucose homeostasis such as amylin and glucagon. Amylin is co-expressed with insulin from the pancreas β-cells but does not have insulinotropic function. Amylin suppresses glucagon secretion, slowing gastric emptying and suppressing the reward center in the central nervous system, leading to weight loss. However, amylin can self-aggregate and cause serious cytotoxicity and may cause β-cell apoptosis. Glucagon is secreted by pancreatic α-cells and participates in glucose homeostasis in a glucose-dependent manner. In hypoglycemia, glucagon increases the blood glucose level by glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis and inhibits glycogenesis in the liver. Several triple agonists, in combination with dual incretins and glucagon, are being developed.

Diabetes mellitus, particularly Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) remains a significant concern globally with an increase in prevalence reported in recent years. If diabetes is not managed properly, it can lead to several complications including an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Cardiovascular complications such as coronary heart disease, peripheral artery disease, and stroke are common among individuals with diabetes. Therefore, the timely management of diabetes becomes very important. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have emerged as a promising class of medications that offer benefits beyond glycemic control. Among various benefits, GLP-1 RAs can promote pancreatic β-cell proliferation and reduce their apoptosis. They also exert central effects on appetite and energy balance. Furthermore, the weight-lowering potential of GLP-1 RAs has also been documented in literature which can provide indirect benefit to CVD prevention. Long-term GLP-1 RAs generally have superior efficacy over short-term GLP-1 RAs in terms of controlling overnight and fasting plasma glucose levels. However, short-acting GLP-1 RAs, such as exenatide and lixisenatide, maintain their influence on gastric emptying during prolonged use. Adverse events, particularly, gastrointestinal adverse events, remain a concern with GLP-1 RA use. These symptoms usually appear at the start of treatment but fade as the body adjusts to the medication. GLP-1 RAs have shown beneficial effects on cardiovascular health, including a reduction in the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events. In conclusion, GLP-1 RAs provide multifaceted benefits in T2DM as they not only maintain glycemic control but also decrease cardiovascular risk.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) are commonly used to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Various adverse reactions have been gradually reported. This case presents a rare phenomenon in which a GLP1-RA caused a marked elevation in carbohydrate antigen 19-9(CA 19-9) without evidence of a tumor.

A mixed-methods approach was utilized, incorporating medical history obtained from regular outpatient consultations and follow-up visits, along with ancillary examinations derived from laboratory tests and imaging.

The use of a GLP1-RA for treating T2DM resulted in an increase in CA 19-9 without evidence of a tumor, which gradually normalized after discontinuation of the drug.

GLP1-RAs may lead to elevated levels of tumor markers during the treatment of T2DM, necessitating monitoring during therapy. Antidiabetic management should be adjusted on an individual basis as needed.

Obesity is a disease of epidemic proportions in the United States and contributes to morbidity and mortality for a large part of the population. In addition, the financial costs of this disease to society are high. Lifestyle modifications are key to prevention and treatment but adherence and long-term success have been challenging. Bariatric surgery has been available and pharmacologic approaches, first developed in the 1950s, continue to be an option; however, existing formulations have not provided optimal clinical efficacy and have had many concerning adverse effects. Over the last decade, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, a novel group of medications for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, were found to produce significant weight loss. Several formulations, at higher doses, received FDA approval for the treatment of obesity or those overweight with weight-related co-morbidities. More hormone-based therapies were and are being developed, some with dual or triple-receptor agonist activity. Their use, however, is not without questions and concerns as to long-term safety and efficacy, problems with cost and reimbursement, and how their use may intersect with public health efforts to manage the obesity epidemic. This review will focus on the GLP-1 receptor agonists currently used for weight loss and discuss their pharmacology, pertinent research findings establishing their benefits and risks, issues with prescribing these medications, and a perspective from a public health point of view.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), a class of injectable antidiabetic drugs, have shown significant efficacies in improving glycemic and weight control in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, the long-term safety of GLP-1 RAs remains insufficiently studied. This study aimed to provide real-world evidence on potential adverse outcomes associated with GLP-1 RAs use in T2D patients without major chronic diseases including impaired cardiac or renal function.

We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving 7746 T2D patients on GLP-1 RAs in Shenzhen, China. They were compared with 124 371 metformin-only users and 36 146 insulin-only users, forming two therapy control groups. GLP-1 RAs users were also further 1:2 paired with the control groups. Competing risk survival analyses were conducted to assess the incidence risks, presenting subdistributional hazard ratios (sHRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for various adverse outcomes associated with GLP-1 RAs use.

Compared with metformin-only users, GLP-1 RAs use was associated with increased risks of various adverse outcomes (sHRs with 95% CIs), including pancreatitis (2.01, 1.24-3.24), acute nephritis (3.20, 2.17-4.70), kidney failure (3.73, 2.74-5.08), thyroid cancer (2.25, 1.23-4.10), and thyroid dysfunction (1.27, 1.00-1.63), respectively; Similar results were also found when compared with insulin-only users. Importantly, long-term (≥12 months) GLP-1 RAs use may further elevate the incidence risks of pancreatitis, acute nephritis, thyroid cancer, and thyroid dysfunction.

Compared with traditional T2D treatments, GLP-1 RAs use may be associated with increased risks of various adverse outcomes in a Chinese population. Cautions were strongly warranted in the use of GLP-1 RAs. Further validation is crucial across diverse populations.

Visepegenatide, a once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist injection, demonstrated effective glycaemic control and good tolerability without the requirement of dose titration in the two completed phase 2 studies. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of visepegenatide in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) inadequately controlled by metformin monotherapy in this phase 3 clinical study.

This multicentre phase 3 clinical study included a 24-week, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind period followed by a 28-week open-label extended treatment period. Patients (N = 620) aged ≥18 and ≤75 years with glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥7.0% and ≤10.5% [≥53.0 and ≤91.27 mmol/mol], were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive visepegenatide 150-μg or placebo once-weekly subcutaneous injection during the double-blind period. Subsequently, the patients in the placebo group were switched to visepegenatide treatment (placebo→visepegenatide group), and the patients in the visepegenatide group continued the same treatment during the open-label extended treatment period. The primary endpoint was the change in HbA1c from baseline to week 24.

At week 24, the placebo-adjusted least squares mean (LSM) change of HbA1c was -0.57% (95% CI -0.71 to -0.43) with visepegenatide (p < 0.001). The proportion of patients achieving HbA1c < 7.0% and ≤6.5% [<53 and ≤ 48 mmol/mol] was higher in the visepegenatide group versus the placebo group (115 [40.5%] vs 50 [17.9%]; p < 0.001, and 60 [21.1%] vs 17 [6.1%]; p < 0.001). Visepegenatide demonstrated a significant reduction in fasting plasma glucose and 2-h postprandial glucose compared with placebo. Trends in the improvement of these variables were maintained during the open-label extended treatment period. No severe gastrointestinal adverse event or severe hypoglycaemia was reported during the 52-week study period.

Once-weekly injection of visepegenatide 150 μg as an add-on treatment to metformin therapy significantly improved glycaemic control and was generally well tolerated in Chinese patients with T2DM who were inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy.

The study was funded by PegBio Co., Ltd, Suzhou, China.

This algorithm was issued for the appropriate use of drugs for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Japan. The revisions include safety considerations, fatty liver disease as a comorbidity to be taken into account and the position of tirzepatide.

Adipose tissue (AT) represents a plastic organ that can undergo significant remodeling in response to metabolic demands. With its numerous checkpoints, the incretin system seems to play a significant role in controlling glucose homeostasis and energy balance. The importance of the incretin hormones, namely the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and the glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP), in controlling the function of adipose cells has been brought to light by recent studies. Notably, a "paradigm shift" in reevaluating the role of the incretin system in AT as a potential target to treat obesity-linked metabolic disorders resulted from the demonstration that a disruption of the GIP and GLP-1 signaling axis in fat is associated with adiposity-induced insulin-resistance (IR) and/or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). We will briefly discuss the (patho)physiological functions of GLP-1 and GIP signaling in AT in this review, emphasizing their potential impacts on lipid storage, adipogenesis, glucose metabolism and inflammation. We will also address the conundrum with the perturbation of the incretin axis in white or brown fat tissue and the emergence of metabolic disorders. In order to reduce or avoid adiposity-related metabolic complications, we will finally go over a potential scientific rationale for suggesting AT as a novel target for GLP-1 and GIP receptor agonists and co-agonists.

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) affects 1 in 3-4 adult individuals and can progress to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) and cirrhosis. Insulin resistance plays a central role in MASLD/MASH pathophysiology with higher rates of MASLD (2 in 3) and MASH with fibrosis (1 in 5) in adults with obesity and diabetes. This review summarizes the role of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in treating MASLD/MASH. Although not approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of MASLD, this class of medication is available to treat obesity and type 2 diabetes and has been shown to reverse steatohepatitis, reduce cardiovascular risk, and is safe to use across the spectrum of MASLD with or without fibrosis.

The purpose of this review is to describe the existing limited data related to the use of semaglutide in adolescents with obesity, supplementing with findings from adult studies of semaglutide use.

Semaglutide, as a once weekly subcutaneous injection for weight management, effectively reduces body mass index (BMI) while improving hyperglycemia, elevated alanine aminotransferase levels, hyperlipidemia, and quality of life in youth with obesity. As of this review, only one large randomized clinical trial of semaglutide in youth has been completed, with a follow-up duration of 68 weeks. Thus, long-term data on the safety in adolescents is limited, particularly regarding the risks of cholelithiasis, pancreatitis, suicidal ideation, and disordered eating. Due to the cost of semaglutide, particularly in the United States, limited cost effectiveness analyses have demonstrated unfavorable incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for semaglutide relative to phentermine-topiramate as an alternative antiobesity medication in adolescents.

Semaglutide represents an important advance in the pediatric obesity management, with clear short-term reductions in BMI and improvement in metabolic parameters. However, its long-term safety and efficacy for youth with obesity remain to be demonstrated. Additional research is needed to assess trends in utilization and adherence to minimize the risk of worsening socioeconomic disparities in pediatric obesity.

Patients suffering from acromegaly and Cushing's Disease (CD) face the risk of several clinical complications. The onset of diabetes mellitus (DM) is among the most important: exposure to elevated growth hormone or cortisol levels is associated with insulin resistance (IR). DM contributes to increasing cardiovascular risk for these subjects, which is higher compared to healthy individuals. Hyperglycemia may also be caused by pasireotide, a second-generation somatostatin receptor ligand (SRLs), currently used for the treatment of these diseases. Accordingly, with 2014 medical expert recommendations, the management of hyperglycemia in patients with CD and treated with pasireotide is based on lifestyle changes, metformin, DPP-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) and, subsequently, GLP-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1 RAs). There is no position for SGLT2-inhibitors (SGLT2-i). However, a very recent experts' consensus regarding the management of pasireotide-induced hyperglycemia in patients with acromegaly suggests the use of GLP-1 RAs as first line treatment (in suitable patients) and the use of SGLT2-i as second line treatment in patients with high cardiovascular risk or renal disease. As a matter of fact, beyond the hypoglycemic effect of GLP1-RAs and SGLT2-i, there is increasing evidence regarding their role in the reduction of cardiovascular risk, commonly very high in acromegaly and CD and often tough to improve despite biochemical remission. So, an increasing use of GLP1-RAs and SGLT2-i to control hyperglycemia is desirable in these diseases. Obviously, all of that must be done with due attention in order to minimize the occurrence of adverse events. For this reason, large studies are needed to analyze the presence of potential limitations.

Background: Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) has crucial impact on glycemic control and weight loss physiologically. GLP-1 receptor agonists have been approved for treatment of diabetes and obesity. Emerging evidence suggests that GLP-1 receptor agonists exert anticancer effect in tumorigenesis and development. However, the role and mechanism of GLP-1 signaling-related genes in pan-cancer still need further study. Methods: We comprehensively investigated the aberrant expression and genetic alterations of GLP-1 signaling-related genes in 33 cancer types. Next, GLP-1 signaling score of each patient in The Cancer Genome Atlas were established by the single-sample gene set enrichment analysis. In addition, we explored the association of GLP-1 signaling score with prognostic significance and immune characteristics. Furthermore, qRT-PCR and immunohistochemistry staining were applied to verify the expression profiling of GLP-1 signaling-related genes in colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues. Wound-healing assays and migration assays were carried out to validate the role of GLP-1 receptor agonist in CRC cell lines. Results: The expression profiling of GLP-1 signaling-related genes is commonly altered in pan-cancer. The score was decreased in cancer tissues compared with normal tissues and the lower expression score was associated with worse survival in most of cancer types. Notably, GLP-1 signaling score was strongly correlated with immune cell infiltration, including T cells, neutrophils, dendritic cells and macrophages. In addition, GLP-1 signaling score exhibited close association with tumor mutation burden, microsatellite instability and immunotherapy response in patients with cancer. Moreover, we found that the expression of GLP-1 signaling-related genes ITPR1 and ADCY5 were significantly reduced in CRC tissues, and GLP-1 receptor agonist semaglutide impaired the migration capacity of CRC cells, indicating its protective role. Conclusion: This study provided a preliminary understanding of the GLP-1 signaling-related genes in pan-cancer, showing the prognosis significance and potential immunotherapeutic values in most cancer types, and verified the potential anticancer effect of GLP-1 receptor agonist in CRC.

In 2020, the US Food and Drug Administration approved liraglutide (glucagon-like-peptide-1-receptor-agonist) as an adjunctive therapy for weight management in adolescents aged 12 to 18 years in combination with a reduced-calorie diet and increased physical activity. The 2023 American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines recommend pharmacotherapy with glucagon-like-peptide-1-receptor-agonist as a second-line therapy in obesity management. Although reports in adults have suggested a link between liraglutide and adverse effects including hepatic injury and acute kidney injury (AKI), these effects have not previously been reported among adolescents treated with liraglutide for weight loss. We present a 17-year-old male who developed AKI and evidence of hepatic injury (significant elevation of hepatic transaminases) after 3 months administration of the lowest dosage of liraglutide (0.6 mg/day) for management of class III obesity. The patient experienced significant loss of appetite, weight loss, and melancholy during the treatment period. One month after discontinuing liraglutide, his mood had improved, his liver enzymes had returned to normal, and AKI had resolved. The Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale suggested a high likelihood of a causative association between liraglutide and his symptoms. Our report highlights the importance of vigilance in monitoring for these potential adverse effects among adolescents treated for obesity with any dose of liraglutide.

The Japan Diabetes Society (JDS) adopted a sweeping decision to release consensus statements on relevant issues in diabetes management that require updating from time to time and launched a "JDS Committee on Consensus Statement Development." In March 2020, the committee's first consensus statement on "Medical Nutrition Therapy and Dietary Counseling for People with Diabetes" was published. In September 2022, a second consensus "algorithm for pharmacotherapy in people with type 2 diabetes" was proposed. In developing an algorithm for diabetes pharmacotherapy in people with type 2 diabetes, the working concept was that priority should be given to selecting such medications as would appropriately address the diabetes pathology in each patient while simultaneously weighing the available evidence for these medications and the prescribing patterns in clinical practice in Japan. These consensus statements are intended to present the committee's take on diabetes management in Japan, based on the evidence currently available for each of the issues addressed. It is thus hoped that practicing diabetologists will not fail to consult these statements to provide the best available practice in their respective clinical settings. Given that the persistent dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist tirzepatide was approved in April 2023, these consensus statements have been revised1). In this revision, specifically, tirzepatide was added to the end of [likely involving insulin resistance] of "Obese patients" in Step 1: "Select medications to address the diabetes pathology involved" in Fig. 2. While the sentence, "Insulin insufficiency and resistance can be assessed by referring to the various indices listed in the JDS 'Guide to Diabetes Management.' was mentioned in the previous edition as well, "While insulin resistance is analogized based on BMI, abdominal obesity, and visceral fat accumulation, an assessment of indicators (e.g., HOMA-IR) is desirable" was added as information in order to more accurately recognize the pathology. Regarding Step 2: "Give due consideration to safety," "For renal excretion" was added to the "Rule of thumb 2: Avoid glinides in patients with renal impairment." The order of the medications in "rule of thumb 3: Avoid thiazolidinediones and biguanides in patients with heart failure (in whom they are contraindicated)." to thiazolidinediones then biguanides. In the description of the lowest part of Fig. 2, for each patient failing to achieve his/her HbA1c control goal, "while reverting to step 1" was changed to "while reverting to the opening" and "including reassessment if the patient is indicated for insulin therapy" was added. In the separate table, the column for tirzepatides was added, while the two items, "Characteristic side effects" and "Persistence of effect" were added to the area of interest. The revision also carried additional descriptions of the figure and table such as tirzepatides and "Characteristic side effects" in the statement, and while not mentioned in the proposed algorithm figure, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is covered from this revision for patients with comorbidities calling for medical attention. Moreover, detailed information was added to the relative/absolute indication for insulin therapy, the Kumamoto Declaration 2013 for glycemic targets, and glycemic targets for older people with diabetes. Again, in this revision, it is hoped that the algorithm presented here will not only contribute to improved diabetes management in Japan, but will continue to evolve into a better algorithm over time, reflecting new evidence as it becomes available.

In this meta-analysis, we aim to evaluate the risk of gallbladder and biliary disease of weight management strategies and investigate the association between weight reduction and risk of gallbladder or biliary disease. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a duration of at least 12 weeks that compare antiobesity medications (AOMs) with placebo or bariatric surgery with less intensive weight management strategy were concluded. Weight management strategy was associated with a significant increased risk of gallbladder or biliary disease (OR 1.361, 95% CI 1.147 to 1.614, P < 0.001, I2 = 3.5%), cholelithiasis, cholecystitis, and cholecystectomy compared with placebo or controls. The increased risk of gallbladder or biliary disease was observed both in pharmacotherapies subgroup and bariatric surgery subgroup. With regards of specific pharmacotherapies, an increased risk of gallbladder or biliary disease was observed in trials with glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) treatments. In addition, trials with indication of obesity and overweight treatment and trials with higher doses showed significant higher risk of gallbladder or biliary disease compared with placebo or controls. In conclusion, weight management strategy was associated with an increased risk of gallbladder or biliary disease when compared with placebo or control groups.

The existing evidence from pre- and post-marketing studies is conflicting on the risk of pancreatic events for anti-diabetic medications.

A retrospective case/non-case study was conducted by using spontaneous reports on pancreatic events for anti-diabetic medications from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and VigiBase. Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), and Information Component (IC) were calculated by a disproportionality analysis. Furthermore, PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on anti-diabetic drugs with pancreatic outcomes.

The FAERS data analysis found strong signals on incretin mimetics causing pancreatic events, with sitagliptin having the highest risk [PRR = 24.2, lower bound (LB) ROR = 24.4, IC025 = 4.4 for pancreatitis, and PRR = 15.4, LB ROR = 14.9, IC025 = 3.8 for pancreatic carcinoma]. Empagliflozin was the most pancreatitis-risk sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor [PRR = 4.0, LB ROR = 3.5, IC025 = 1.8]. VigiBase reiterated these findings and identified some new signals for novel anti-diabetics. Meta-analysis revealed that the incidence of pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma with anti-diabetic medications was insignificant. However, compared to the placebo/active comparator, gliptins had a higher risk of acute pancreatitis (OR 1.44; 95% CI 1.03, 2.01; P = 0.03).

Evidence from the post-marketing safety data analysis identified a strong association between incretin mimetics and pancreatic events. Fewer events in RCTs may justify insignificant meta-analysis results.

Background: Pancreatitis is characterized by inflammation of the pancreas and significantly affects quality of life. Less than 5% of pancreatitis cases are drug-induced, but recent evidence suggests a substantial risk associated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs). The aim of this study was to compare the risk of developing pancreatitis between those using GLP-1 RAs and those using sodium-glucose transport protein 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors. Methods: This study was done using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from 2019 to 2021. This database contains information from diverse submissions from healthcare providers, patients, and manufacturers. To ensure fairness and accuracy, the risk of pancreatitis associated with other hypoglycemic agents (SGLT2 inhibitors and DPP-4 inhibitors) was also investigated. Traditional and Bayesian statistical analysis methods were used to identify disproportionate statistics and included the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), empirical Bayes geometric mean (EBGM), and information component (IC). A drug-adverse-event combination that met the criteria of all four indices was deemed a signal. Results: The analysis of 2,313 pancreatitis reports linked to hypoglycemic agents revealed a predominant association with GLP-1 RA (70.2%) compared to DPP-4 inhibitors (15%) and SGLT2 (14.7%). Most of these reports involved female patients (50.4%), and the highest incidence occurred in those over 50 years old (38.4%). Additionally, 17.7% of the reports were associated with serious events. The ROR was significant for the risk of pancreatitis when using DPP-4 (13.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 11.84-14.70), while the ROR for GLP-1 was 9.65 (95% CI 9.17-10.16). The EBGM was highest with DPP-4 (12.25), followed by GLP-1 (8.64), while IC was highest with DPP-4 inhibitors (3.61). Liraglutide had the greatest association with pancreatitis among the GLP-1 RAs (ROR: 6.83, 95% CI 6.60-7.07). Conclusion: The findings show that pancreatitis has a strong link with DPP-4 inhibitors and GPL1 agonists, which pose a greater risk. Among the GLP-1 agonist medications, liraglutide has been found to have an association with pancreatitis.

Individuals with lipodystrophies typically suffer from metabolic disease linked to adipose tissue dysfunction including lipoatrophic diabetes. In the most severe forms of lipodystrophy, congenital generalised lipodystrophy, adipose tissue may be almost entirely absent. Better therapies for affected individuals are urgently needed. Here we performed the first detailed investigation of the effects of a glucagon like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonist in lipoatrophic diabetes, using mice with generalised lipodystrophy.

Lipodystrophic insulin resistant and glucose intolerant seipin knockout mice were treated with the GLP-1R agonist liraglutide either acutely preceding analyses of insulin and glucose tolerance or chronically prior to metabolic phenotyping and ex vivo studies.

Acute liraglutide treatment significantly improved insulin, glucose and pyruvate tolerance. Once daily injection of seipin knockout mice with liraglutide for 14 days led to significant improvements in hepatomegaly associated with steatosis and reduced markers of liver fibrosis. Moreover, liraglutide enhanced insulin secretion in response to glucose challenge with concomitantly improved glucose control.

GLP-1R agonist liraglutide significantly improved lipoatrophic diabetes and hepatic steatosis in mice with generalised lipodystrophy. This provides important insights regarding the benefits of GLP-1R agonists for treating lipodystrophy, informing more widespread use to improve the health of individuals with this condition.

Obesity is a multifactorial chronic disease characterized by an excess of adipose tissue, affecting people of all ages. In the last 40 years, the incidence of overweight and obesity almost tripled worldwide. The accumulation of "visceral" adipose tissue increases with aging, leading to several cardio-metabolic consequences: from increased blood pressure to overt arterial hypertension, from insulin-resistance to overt type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), dyslipidemia, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and obstructive sleep apnea. The increasing use of innovative drugs, namely glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2-i), is changing the management of obesity and its related cardiovascular complications significantly. These drugs, first considered only for T2DM treatment, are now used in overweight patients with visceral adiposity or obese patients, as obesity is no longer just a risk factor but a critical condition at the basis of common metabolic, cardiovascular, and renal diseases. An adipocentric vision and approach should become the cornerstone of visceral overweight and obesity integrated management and treatment, reducing and avoiding the onset of obesity-related multiple risk factors and their clinical complications. According to recent progress in basic and clinical research on adiposity, this narrative review aims to contribute to a novel clinical approach focusing on pathophysiological and therapeutic insights.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are a class of medications for management of diabetes and obesity. The objective of this study is to characterize the epidemiology of GLP-1RA cases reported to US poison centers.

We analyzed cases involving a GLP-1RA reported to the National Poison Data System during 2017-2022.

There were 5,713 single-substance exposure cases reported to US poison centers involving a GLP-1RA. Most cases were among females (71.3%) and attributable to therapeutic errors (79.9%). More than one-fifth (22.4%) of cases were evaluated in a healthcare facility, including 0.9% admitted to a critical care unit and 4.1% admitted to a non-critical care unit. Serious medical outcomes were described in 6.2% of cases, including one fatality. The rate of cases per one million US population increased from 1.16 in 2017 to 3.49 in 2021, followed by a rapid increase of 80.9% to 6.32 in 2022. Trends for rates of serious medical outcomes and admissions to a healthcare facility showed similar patterns with 129.9% and 95.8% increases, respectively, from 2021 to 2022.

Most GLP-1RA cases reported to US poison centers were associated with no or minimal effects and did not require referral for medical treatment; however, a notable minority of individuals experienced a serious medical outcome or healthcare facility admission. The rate of reported cases increased during the study period, including an 80.9% increase from 2021 to 2022. Opportunities exist to improve provider and patient awareness of the adverse effects of these medications.

Pancreatic carcinoma is a highly aggressive tumor that usually presents when it has already metastasized. Therapeutic options for cure remain scarce and rely on combination chemotherapy with limited sustainability. Diabetes is considered an important risk factor for the development of pancreatic cancer due to the production of proinflammatory cytokines, which result in increased cell proliferation. More than half of patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer eventually develop diabetes due to the destruction of insulin-producing cells. The interlinkage of both diseases might identify a possible preventative strategy for reducing the incidence of pancreatic carcinoma. This study reviewed the recent literature on the association between pancreatic cancer risk and SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP-1 RA, DPP-4 inhibitors, and biguanides. There are mixed data regarding the relationship between GLP-1 RA and DPP-4 inhibitors and pancreatic cancer, with some trials suggesting that they might increase the risk. In contrast, studies have mostly revealed that SGLT2 inhibitors have an antiproliferative effect on various tumors, such as liver, pancreatic, prostate, bowel, lung, and breast carcinoma, which might be due to their mechanism of blockage of reabsorption of glucose by cells, lowering the amount of available glucose for the growth of tumor cells. Metformin, the first-line agent for diabetes, has also been shown to be associated with decreasing pancreatic cancer risk and improving prognosis in those who already have the disease. Dedicated trials are needed to further delineate the association of antidiabetic drugs with the risk of pancreatic cancer in the general population, as previous studies have mostly focused on diabetic patients.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RA) have been transformative for patients and clinicians in treating type-2 diabetes and obesity. Drugs of this class, the bioavailability of which is continuously improving, enable weight loss and control blood glucose with minimal unwanted side effects. Since adopting GLP1RA for treating metabolic diseases, animal and clinical studies have revealed their beneficial effects on several other pathologies, including cardiovascular diseases, neurodegeneration, kidney disease, and cancer. A notable commonality between these diseases is their association with older age. Clinical trials and preclinical data suggest that GLP1RA may improve outcomes in these aging-related diseases. Some of the benefits of GLP1RA may be indirect due to their effects on obesity and glucose metabolism. However, there is building evidence that GLP1RA may also act directly on multiple organs implicated in aging-related pathology. This review aims to compile the studies reporting the effects of GLP1RA on aging-related diseases and discuss potential underlying mechanisms.

The present systematic review aimed to synthesize available data from recently published randomized trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy and safety of the novel, orally administered, small-molecule glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) orforglipron and danuglipron for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), obesity or both.

Literature search was performed through Medline (via PubMed), Cochrane Library and Scopus until August 16, 2023. Double-independent study selection, data extraction and quality assessment were performed. Evidence was pooled with random effects meta-analysis.

Totally, 1037 patients among seven RCTs were analyzed. All RCTs had low risk of bias according to the Cochrane Collaboration tool (RoB2). Novel GLP-1RAs led to significant reduction in HbA1c in patients with T2DM compared to controls (MD = -1.03 %; 95 % CI = [-1.29, -0.77]; P < 0.001). A significantly greater weight reduction was also noted both in patients with T2DM or obesity compared to controls (MD = -3.26 kg; 95 % CI = [-4.79, -1.72]; P < 0.001 and MD = -7.52 kg; 95 % CI = [-14.63, -0.41]; P = 0.038, respectively; P for subgroup differences = 0.25). Regarding safety, novel GLP-1RAs showed a neutral effect on the odds of severe hypoglycemia or serious adverse events (OR = 0.34; 95 % CI = [0.09, 1.31]; P = 0.11 and OR = 0.95; 95 % CI = [0.39, 2.34]; P = 0.91, respectively) and significantly higher odds of gastrointestinal, treatment-emergent adverse events (OR = 2.57; 95 % CI = [1.49, 4.42]; P < 0.001) and adverse events leading to discontinuation (OR = 2.89; 95 % CI = [1.22, 6.87]; P = 0.016).

Preliminary evidence supports that orforglipron and danuglipron are efficient in glycemic control and weight reduction in T2DM, obesity or both. More longitudinal research is warranted in order to provide deeper insights into their efficacy, safety and tolerability before their potential incorporation in the pharmacological arsenal against T2DM or obesity.

The incidence of cholecystitis is relatively high in developed countries and may usually be attributed to gallstones, the treatment for which involves complete surgical removal of the gallbladder (cholecystectomy). Bile acids produced following cholecystectomy continue to flow into the duodenum but are poorly absorbed by the colon. Excessive bile acids in the colon stimulate mucosal secretion of water and electrolytes leading, in severe cases, to diarrhoea. Bile acid diarrhoea (BAD) is difficult to diagnose, requiring a comprehensive medical history and physical examination in combination with laboratory evaluation. The current work reviews the diagnosis and treatment of BAD following cholecystectomy.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and its complications have significantly increased the burden of mortality and disability globally, making diabetes one of the most dangerous and prevalent chronic diseases. Acute pancreatitis (AP) is one of the most frequent gastrointestinal causes for hospital admission, which is a common exocrine pancreatic inflammatory disease that can cause severe abdominal pain and multiple organ dysfunction. There is an inseparable relationship between AP and diabetes. Diabetes is a high risk factor of AP, and patients with AP can develop pancreatogenic diabetes. In T2DM patients, the incidence rate of AP is significantly higher than that of the general population, and the clinical symptoms are more severe, with the majority of cases being moderate to severe AP. This review briefly introduces the pathogenesis and clinical features of AP in T2DM patients, focusing on the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) manifestations of AP in T2DM patients. Our aim is to evaluate the severity of AP in patients with T2DM by MRI, so as to help clinicians assess the patient's condition and prognosis.

Type 2 diabetes is a chronic and progressive cardiometabolic disorder that affects more than 10% of adults worldwide and is a major cause of morbidity, mortality, disability, and high costs. Over the past decade, the pattern of management of diabetes has shifted from a predominantly glucose centric approach, focused on lowering levels of haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), to a directed complications centric approach, aimed at preventing short term and long term complications of diabetes, and a pathogenesis centric approach, which looks at the underlying metabolic dysfunction of excess adiposity that both causes and complicates the management of diabetes. In this review, we discuss the latest advances in patient centred care for type 2 diabetes, focusing on drug and non-drug approaches to reducing the risks of complications of diabetes in adults. We also discuss the effects of social determinants of health on the management of diabetes, particularly as they affect the treatment of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes.

French national health care insurance system database has suggested 1-3 years use of glucagon like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RA) (exenatide, liraglutide and dulaglutide) may be linked with increased occurrence of thyroid cancer. Similar data on semaglutide is not-available. Hence, we undertook this systematic review to look at the safety of semaglutide focussing on different cancers.

Databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world studies involving patients receiving semaglutide in the intervention-arm. Primary outcome was to evaluate the occurrence of pancreatic and thyroid cancers. Secondary outcomes were to the evaluate occurrence of any other malignancies or severe adverse-events.

Data from 37 RCTs and 19 real-world studies having 16,839 patients in placebo-control group, 16,550 patients in active-control group and 13,330 patients in real-world studies were analysed. Compared to placebo, occurrence of pancreatic cancer [OR 0.25 (95%CI: 0.03-2.24); P = 0.21], thyroid cancer [OR 2.04 (95%CI: 0.33-12.61); P = 0.44; I2 = 0%] and all neoplasms (benign, malignant and otherwise unspecified) [OR 0.95 (95%CI:0.62-1.45); P = 0.82; I2 = 0%] was similar in the semaglutide group. Compared to active controls, occurrence of pancreatic cancer [OR 0.40 (95%CI:0.09-1.87); P = 0.26; I2 = 0%], thyroid cancer [OR 1.19 (95%CI:0.15-9.66); P = 0.87; I2 = 0%] and all neoplasms (benign, malignant and otherwise unspecified) [OR 0.91 (95% CI: 0.44-1.89); P = 0.79; I2 = 0%] were similar in the semaglutide group. Real-world data analysis revealed single case each of pancreatic cancer and B-cell lymphoma.

Semaglutide use in RCTs and real-world studies was not associated with an increased risk of any types of cancer, and this conclusion is supported by a high grade of evidence.

Drug induced acute pancreatitis is a difficult diagnosis for clinicians. We previously published an "Evidence-Based Classification System" on Drug-Induced Acute Pancreatitis widely used by clinicians to assist in the identification of drugs. Unfortunately, this prior analysis based only on published case reports has been misunderstood. The prior review did not include studies with higher evidentiary value, such as randomized trials, case-control studies, and/or pharmacoepidemiologic studies. The use of the prior classification system has led to many patients being inappropriately labeled as having drug-induced acute pancreatitis. We now propose a "Revised" Evidence- Based Classification System for the purpose of determining which drugs cause acute pancreatitis based on the Grading of Recommendations, Development, and Evaluation criteria.

A search of the English Language literature was performed to identify all case reports with medication and/or drug induced acute pancreatitis. We divided the drugs implicated as causing acute pancreatitis into four groups based on the quality of evidence as defined by GRADE quality parameters.

Although 141 drugs were identified in the literature as causing acute pancreatitis, only 106 drugs published in the literature as causing acute pancreatitis were high quality case reports. Only 3 drugs had evidence as causing acute pancreatitis from randomized controlled clinical trials, including 6-mercaptopurine and azathioprine.

The vast majority of drugs implicated as causing acute pancreatitis in the literature have low or very low quality of evidence supporting those claims.