1
|
Sambommatsu Y, Kumaran V, Imai D, Savsani K, Khan AA, Sharma A, Saeed M, Cotterell AH, Levy MF, Lee SD, Bruno DA. Early outcomes of robotic vs open living donor right hepatectomy in a US Center. Surg Endosc 2025; 39:1643-1652. [PMID: 39779531 PMCID: PMC11870880 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11469-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2024] [Accepted: 12/01/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic living donor hepatectomy offers potential advantages but has been limited to high-volume centers, primarily in Asia and the Middle East. We report our experience establishing a robotic living donor right hepatectomy program in a U.S. center with low LDLT volume and no prior laparoscopic donor hepatectomy experience and analyze early outcomes. METHODS This retrospective cohort study analyzed 37 living donor right hepatectomies (13 robotic [including one open conversion], 24 open) performed between June 2022 and February 2024. RESULTS The robotic group had longer operative times (median [range], 451 [374-568] minutes vs 368 [276-421] minutes; P < 0.001) but less blood loss (median [range], 200 [50-700] mL vs 900 [300-2500] mL; P < 0.001). One case required unplanned open conversion due to gas embolism. Two hematomas/bleeding (Clavien-Dindo grade IIIB) occurred in the robotic group, but no biliary complications. Comprehensive Complication Index, liver function tests, and hospital stays were similar between the two groups, with no 90-day graft failure/mortality. CONCLUSION With extensive surgical experience in both open donor hepatectomy and robotic surgery, along with meticulous preparation as a team, U.S. centers with lower LDLT volume and no laparoscopic experience can safely implement robotic living donor right hepatectomy, achieving comparable short-term outcomes to the open approach. Further research on long-term outcomes and donor quality of life is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuzuru Sambommatsu
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hume- Lee Transplant Center, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Vinay Kumaran
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hume- Lee Transplant Center, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Daisuke Imai
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hume- Lee Transplant Center, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Kush Savsani
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Aamir A Khan
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hume- Lee Transplant Center, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Amit Sharma
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hume- Lee Transplant Center, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Muhammad Saeed
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hume- Lee Transplant Center, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Adrian H Cotterell
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hume- Lee Transplant Center, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Marlon F Levy
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hume- Lee Transplant Center, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Seung Duk Lee
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hume- Lee Transplant Center, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA.
| | - David A Bruno
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hume- Lee Transplant Center, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Semash K, Dzhanbekov T. Laparoscopic donor hepatectomy: Are there obstacles on the path to global widespread? LAPAROSCOPIC, ENDOSCOPIC AND ROBOTIC SURGERY 2024. [DOI: 10.1016/j.lers.2024.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2025] Open
|
3
|
Al-Seraji A, Adeyemo S, Gurakar A, Shah R, Bunnapradist S, Lentine KL, Redfield RR, Gurakar M, Amin AN, Muzaale AD, Humar A, Al Ammary F, Alqahtani SA. Interplay of Donor-Recipient Relationship and Donor Race in Living Liver Donation in the United States. Clin Transplant 2024; 38:e15468. [PMID: 39324935 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.15468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2024] [Revised: 08/03/2024] [Accepted: 09/09/2024] [Indexed: 09/27/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Living liver donation improves survival of end-stage liver disease (ESLD) patients. Yet, it continues to represent a small proportion of United States (U.S.) liver transplantation with existing racial disparities. We investigated the interplay of donor-recipient relationship and donor race to understand donor subgroups with no significant increase. METHODS We studied 4407 living liver donors in the U.S. from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2022 (median age = 36 years, and 59% were biologically related to the recipient). We quantified the change in the number of donors per 3-year increment using negative binomial regression (incidence rate ratio [IRR]), stratified by donor-recipient relationship and race/ethnicity. RESULTS Among biologically related donors, the observed annual number of White donors increased from 146 to 253, Hispanic donors from 18 to 53, and Black donors decreased from 11 to 10. Among unrelated donors, White donors increased from 65 to 221, Hispanic donors from 4 to 25, and Black donors from 3 to 11. For the IRR of biologically related donors aged <40 and ≥40 years, White donors increased by 18% and 22%; Hispanic donors increased by 25% and 54%; and Black donors did not change. Likewise, the IRR of unrelated donors aged <40 and ≥40 years, White donors increased by 48% and 55%; Hispanic donors increased by 52% and 65%; and Black donors did not change. CONCLUSIONS While biologically related donors represent the majority of donors, unrelated donors have substantially risen in recent years, primarily driven by White donors. Although the rate of unrelated donations increased among Hispanic donors, the absolute number remains very small (≤25 donors/year). Interventions are needed to increase education among Hispanic and Black communities to grow unrelated living liver donations across race/ethnicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdula Al-Seraji
- Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Simeon Adeyemo
- Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Ahmet Gurakar
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Riya Shah
- Department of Public Health, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | - Krista L Lentine
- Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Robert R Redfield
- Department of Surgery, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Merve Gurakar
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Alpesh N Amin
- Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | | | - Abhinav Humar
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Fawaz Al Ammary
- Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Saleh A Alqahtani
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Semash K. Evaluation and Management of Living Donors in the Setting of Living Donor Liver Transplant Program in the Republic of Uzbekistan. EXP CLIN TRANSPLANT 2024; 22:664-674. [PMID: 39431833 DOI: 10.6002/ect.2024.0148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2024]
Abstract
In the Republic of Uzbekistan, the history of liver transplantation began in 2018, but this type of medical care was introduced regularly only in 2021. The selection, preparation, and perioperative management of living liver donors can be complicated and have importance in the type of responsible medical care, which requires maximum doctor involvement at all stages. This review has detailed the donor selection algorithm in the Republic of Uzbekistan, donor preparation for liver resection, and basic principles of liver resection surgery in living donors. Algorithms for postoperative donor management and rehabilitation have also been described in detail.
Collapse
|
5
|
Giglio MC, Dolce P, Yilmaz S, Tokat Y, Acarli K, Kilic M, Zeytunlu M, Unek T, Karam V, Adam R, Polak WG, Fondevila C, Nadalin S, Troisi RI. Development of a model to predict the risk of early graft failure after adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation: An ELTR study. Liver Transpl 2024; 30:835-847. [PMID: 38079264 DOI: 10.1097/lvt.0000000000000312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
Graft survival is a critical end point in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (ALDLT), where graft procurement endangers the lives of healthy individuals. Therefore, ALDLT must be responsibly performed in the perspective of a positive harm-to-benefit ratio. This study aimed to develop a risk prediction model for early (3 months) graft failure (EGF) following ALDLT. Donor and recipient factors associated with EGF in ALDLT were studied using data from the European Liver Transplant Registry. An artificial neural network classification algorithm was trained on a set of 2073 ALDLTs, validated using cross-validation, tested on an independent random-split sample (n=518), and externally validated on United Network for Organ Sharing Standard Transplant Analysis and Research data. Model performance was assessed using the AUC, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis. Graft type, graft weight, level of hospitalization, and the severity of liver disease were associated with EGF. The model ( http://ldlt.shinyapps.io/eltr_app ) presented AUC values at cross-validation, in the independent test set, and at external validation of 0.69, 0.70, and 0.68, respectively. Model calibration was fair. The decision curve analysis indicated a positive net benefit of the model, with an estimated net reduction of 5-15 EGF per 100 ALDLTs. Estimated risks>40% and<5% had a specificity of 0.96 and sensitivity of 0.99 in predicting and excluding EGF, respectively. The model also stratified long-term graft survival ( p <0.001), which ranged from 87% in the low-risk group to 60% in the high-risk group. In conclusion, based on a panel of donor and recipient variables, an artificial neural network can contribute to decision-making in ALDLT by predicting EGF risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariano Cesare Giglio
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of HPB and Robotic Surgery, Federico II University Hospital Naples, Italy
| | - Pasquale Dolce
- Department of Translational Medicine, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Sezai Yilmaz
- Department of Surgery and Liver Transplant Institute, Inonu University Faculty of Medicine, Malatya, Turkey
| | - Yaman Tokat
- International Liver Center & Acibadem Healthcare Hospitals, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Koray Acarli
- Department of Organ Transplantation, Istanbul Memorial Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
- Department of Surgery, Istanbul Memorial Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Murat Kilic
- Department of Liver Transplantation, Izmir Kent Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Murat Zeytunlu
- Departments of General Surgery and Gastroenterology, Ege University, School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Tarkan Unek
- Department of General Surgery, Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, Narlidere, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Vincent Karam
- Paul Brousse Hospital, Univ Paris-Sud, Inserm, Villejuif, France
| | - René Adam
- Paul Brousse Hospital, Univ Paris-Sud, Inserm, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Constantino Fondevila
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Silvio Nadalin
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Roberto Ivan Troisi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of HPB and Robotic Surgery, Federico II University Hospital Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Banker A, Cywes C, Muñoz N, Taj R, Bittermann T, Abt P, Abu Gazala S. The Impact of Donor Body Mass Index on Safety and Outcomes in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: An Analysis of the National United States Database. Transplant Direct 2024; 10:e1673. [PMID: 38911275 PMCID: PMC11191960 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2024] [Revised: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 06/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The prevalence of obesity is rising in the general population. Donor obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2) may potentially reduce the donor pool and impact outcomes in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Methods We utilized the national transplant database to investigate the impact of donor obesity on donor and recipient outcomes. This was a retrospective cohort study of all LDLTs performed in the United States between January 2010 and June 2023. Outcomes of interest were analyzed by univariable and multivariable logistic regression. Patient and graft survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional analysis. Results Six hundred seventy-four donors with obesity and 3498 donors without obesity were analyzed. Donors with obesity had higher rates of readmission within 1 y of donation (15.9% versus 11.6%; P = 0.003). The risk of readmission was significantly different between 6 wk and 6 mo of donation (8.8% versus 5.9%; P = 0.036). Donor body mass index (odds ratio [OR], 1.460; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.129-1.999; P = 0.004) and preoperative alkaline phosphatase levels (OR, 1.005; 95% CI, 1.000-1.011; P = 0.038) were independent predictors of donor readmission. High LDLT center volume was associated with reduced odds of donor readmission (OR, 0.509; 95% CI, 0.373-0.694; P < 0.001). Graft and recipient survival was comparable. Conclusions Selection of living donors with obesity may be a potential avenue to increase the available donor pool without compromising recipient outcomes; however, they are at an increased risk for readmission between 6 wk and 6 mo of donation. The reason for readmission requires further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amay Banker
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Claire Cywes
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Nicolas Muñoz
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Raeda Taj
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Therese Bittermann
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Peter Abt
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Samir Abu Gazala
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
De Carlis R, Di Lucca G, Lauterio A, Centonze L, De Carlis L. The long-term follow-up of the living liver donors. Updates Surg 2024:10.1007/s13304-024-01894-4. [PMID: 38926232 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-024-01894-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2023] [Accepted: 05/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been proposed in many countries to reduce organ shortage. While the early postoperative outcomes have been well investigated, little is known about the long-term follow-up of the living donors. We, therefore, designed a systematic review of the literature to explore long-term complications and quality of life among living donors. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE registries for studies published since 2013 that specifically addressed long-term follow-up following living-donor liver donation, concerning both physical and psychological aspects. Publications with a follow-up shorter than 1 year or that did not clearly state the timing of outcomes were excluded. A total of 2505 papers were initially identified. After a thorough selection, 17 articles were identified as meeting the eligibility criteria. The selected articles were mostly from North America and Eastern countries. Follow-up periods ranged from 1 to 11.5 years. The most common complications were incision site discomfort (13.2-38.8%) and psychiatric disorders (1-22%). Biliary strictures occurred in 1-14% of cases. Minimally invasive donor hepatectomy could improve quality of life, but long-term data are limited. About 30 years after the first reported LDLT, little has been published about the long-term follow-up of the living donors. Different factors may contribute to this gap, including the fact that, as healthy individuals, living donors are frequently lost during mid-term follow-up. Although the reported studies seem to confirm long-term donor safety, further research is needed to address the real-life long-term impact of this procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo De Carlis
- PhD Course in Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Padua, Via 8 Febbraio, 235122, Padua, Italy.
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162, Milan, Italy.
| | - Gabriele Di Lucca
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162, Milan, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Lauterio
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162, Milan, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Leonardo Centonze
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162, Milan, Italy
- Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Luciano De Carlis
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162, Milan, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Usta S, Akbulut S, Sarici KB, Garzali IU, Ozdemir F, Gonultas F, Baskiran A, Isik B, Yilmaz S. An Elbow Patch Reconstruction Technique for Narrowed Remnant Portal Veins during Right Lobe Living Donor Hepatectomy: A Rescue Surgery. J Clin Med 2024; 13:2924. [PMID: 38792466 PMCID: PMC11122611 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13102924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2024] [Revised: 04/28/2024] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Treatment of established portal vein narrowing after living donor hepatectomy is challenging. We aimed to present a new approach termed the "elbow patch reconstruction technique" to correct the narrowed remnant portal vein just or late after right lobe living donor hepatectomy. Methods: Demographic and clinical data of 12 living liver donors with narrowed remnant portal veins and treated with the "elbow patch reconstruction technique" were prospectively collected and retrospectively evaluated. Anatomic variation of the portal vein was defined in accordance with the Nakamura classification; six of the living liver donors had type A, three had type B, and the remaining three had type C. In eight of the living liver donors with a narrowed remnant portal vein, diagnosis was detected by intraoperative Doppler ultrasonography and visual inspection by experienced transplant surgeons in the living donor hepatectomy procedure. In the remaining four living liver donors, diagnosis was performed postoperatively when elevation of liver enzymes was noticed during the routine liver function test and Doppler US. The diagnosis was confirmed by multidetector computed tomography. Results: Data from nine males and three females aged 18 to 54 years were analyzed. All of the living liver donors were followed up for a median of 1710 days (min-max: 1178-4447 days; IQR: 1516 days), and none of the living liver donors had any structural or functional complications in the portal vein. Conclusions: Narrowing remnant portal veins are rare, but they are a life-threatening complication in living liver donors, and this condition requires urgent management. Image guided interventions and narrowed segment resection with end-to-end anastomosis using a vascular graft carried a potential risk for thrombosis and restenosis. To avoid these complications, we shared a technique named "elbow patch reconstruction technique". This technique can be very effective in relieving the narrowing of the remnant portal vein after right lobe living donor hepatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sertac Usta
- Department of Surgery and Liver Transplant Institute, Inonu University Faculty of Medicine, Malatya 44280, Turkey; (S.U.); (F.O.); (F.G.); (A.B.); (B.I.); (S.Y.)
| | - Sami Akbulut
- Department of Surgery and Liver Transplant Institute, Inonu University Faculty of Medicine, Malatya 44280, Turkey; (S.U.); (F.O.); (F.G.); (A.B.); (B.I.); (S.Y.)
| | - Kemal Baris Sarici
- Department of Surgery and Liver Transplant Institute, Inonu University Faculty of Medicine, Malatya 44280, Turkey; (S.U.); (F.O.); (F.G.); (A.B.); (B.I.); (S.Y.)
| | | | - Fatih Ozdemir
- Department of Surgery and Liver Transplant Institute, Inonu University Faculty of Medicine, Malatya 44280, Turkey; (S.U.); (F.O.); (F.G.); (A.B.); (B.I.); (S.Y.)
| | - Fatih Gonultas
- Department of Surgery and Liver Transplant Institute, Inonu University Faculty of Medicine, Malatya 44280, Turkey; (S.U.); (F.O.); (F.G.); (A.B.); (B.I.); (S.Y.)
| | - Adil Baskiran
- Department of Surgery and Liver Transplant Institute, Inonu University Faculty of Medicine, Malatya 44280, Turkey; (S.U.); (F.O.); (F.G.); (A.B.); (B.I.); (S.Y.)
| | - Burak Isik
- Department of Surgery and Liver Transplant Institute, Inonu University Faculty of Medicine, Malatya 44280, Turkey; (S.U.); (F.O.); (F.G.); (A.B.); (B.I.); (S.Y.)
| | - Sezai Yilmaz
- Department of Surgery and Liver Transplant Institute, Inonu University Faculty of Medicine, Malatya 44280, Turkey; (S.U.); (F.O.); (F.G.); (A.B.); (B.I.); (S.Y.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Xiao J, Zeng RW, Lim WH, Tan DJH, Yong JN, Fu CE, Tay P, Syn N, Ong CEY, Ong EYH, Chung CH, Lee SY, Koh JH, Teng M, Prakash S, Tan EX, Wijarnpreecha K, Kulkarni AV, Liu K, Danpanichkul P, Huang DQ, Siddiqui MS, Ng CH, Kow AWC, Muthiah MD. The incidence of adverse outcome in donors after living donor liver transplantation: A meta-analysis of 60,829 donors. Liver Transpl 2024; 30:493-504. [PMID: 38015449 DOI: 10.1097/lvt.0000000000000303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
The scarcity of liver grafts has prompted developments in living donor liver transplantations (LDLT), with previous literature illustrating similar outcomes in recipients compared to deceased donor transplants. However, significant concerns regarding living donor morbidity and mortality have yet to be examined comprehensively. This study aims to provide estimates of the incidence of various outcomes in living liver donors. In this meta-analysis, Medline and Embase were searched from inception to July 2022 for articles assessing the incidence of outcomes in LDLT donors. Complications in the included studies were classified into respective organ systems. Analysis of incidence was conducted using a generalized linear mixed model with Clopper-Pearson intervals. Eighty-seven articles involving 60,829 living liver donors were included. The overall pooled incidence of complications in LDLT donors was 24.7% (CI: 21.6%-28.1%). The incidence of minor complications was 17.3% (CI: 14.7%-20.3%), while the incidence of major complications was lower at 5.5% (CI: 4.5%-6.7%). The overall incidence of donor mortality was 0.06% (CI: 0.0%-0.1%) in 49,027 individuals. Psychological complications (7.6%, CI: 4.9%-11.5%) were the most common among LDLT donors, followed by wound-related (5.2%, CI: 4.4%-6.2%) and respiratory complications (4.9%, CI: 3.8%-6.3%). Conversely, cardiovascular complications had the lowest incidence among the subgroups at 0.8% (CI: 0.4%-1.3%). This study presents the incidence of post-LDLT outcomes in living liver donors, illustrating significant psychological, wound-related, and respiratory complications. While significant advancements in recent decades have contributed towards decreased morbidity in living donors, our findings call for targeted measures and continued efforts to ensure the safety and quality of life of liver donors post-LDLT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jieling Xiao
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Wen Hui Lim
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Darren Jun Hao Tan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jie Ning Yong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Clarissa Elysia Fu
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Phoebe Tay
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nicholas Syn
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Biostatistics & Modelling Domain, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Christen En Ya Ong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Elden Yen Hng Ong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Charlotte Hui Chung
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Shi Yan Lee
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jia Hong Koh
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Margaret Teng
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National University Hospital, Singapore
- National University Centre for Organ Transplantation, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Sameer Prakash
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Eunice Xx Tan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National University Hospital, Singapore
- National University Centre for Organ Transplantation, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Karn Wijarnpreecha
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Anand V Kulkarni
- Department of Liver Transplantation, AIG Hospitals, Hyderabad, India
| | - Ken Liu
- A.W. Morrow Gastroenterology and Liver Centre, Australian Liver Transplant Unit, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Liver Injury and Cancer Program, Centenary Institute of Cancer Medicine and Cell Biology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Pojsakorn Danpanichkul
- Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Daniel Q Huang
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National University Hospital, Singapore
- National University Centre for Organ Transplantation, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Mohammad Shadab Siddiqui
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Cheng Han Ng
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Alfred Wei Chieh Kow
- National University Centre for Organ Transplantation, National University Health System, Singapore
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore
| | - Mark D Muthiah
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National University Hospital, Singapore
- National University Centre for Organ Transplantation, National University Health System, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ozturk NB, Bartosek N, Toruner MD, Mumtaz A, Simsek C, Dao D, Saberi B, Gurakar A. Approach to Liver Transplantation: Is There a Difference between East and West? J Clin Med 2024; 13:1890. [PMID: 38610655 PMCID: PMC11012910 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13071890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2024] [Revised: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Liver transplantation (LT) remains the only curative treatment for end-stage liver disease as well as acute liver failure. With the exponential increase in organ demand due to the increasing incidence and prevalence of liver diseases, the need to overcome the supply and demand mismatch has arisen. In this review, we discuss the current universal status of LT, emphasizing various LT practices worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nazli Begum Ozturk
- Department of Internal Medicine, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, MI 48073, USA
| | - Nathanial Bartosek
- Department of Internal Medicine, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, MI 48073, USA
| | | | - Aymen Mumtaz
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Cem Simsek
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Doan Dao
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Behnam Saberi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Ahmet Gurakar
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zhang L, Yang Y, Xie L, Zhou Y, Zhong Z, Ding J, Wang Z, Wang Y, Liu X, Yu F, Wu J. JCAD deficiency delayed liver regenerative repair through the Hippo-YAP signalling pathway. Clin Transl Med 2024; 14:e1630. [PMID: 38509842 PMCID: PMC10955226 DOI: 10.1002/ctm2.1630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Revised: 02/25/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Liver regeneration retardation post partial hepatectomy (PH) is a common clinical problem after liver transplantation. Identification of key regulators in liver regeneration post PH may be beneficial for clinically improving the prognosis of patients after liver transplantation. This study aimed to clarify the function of junctional protein-associated with coronary artery disease (JCAD) in liver regeneration post PH and to reveal the underlying mechanisms. METHODS JCAD knockout (JCAD-KO), liver-specific JCAD-KO (Jcad△Hep) mice and their control group were subjected to 70% PH. RNA sequencing was conducted to unravel the related signalling pathways. Primary hepatocytes from KO mice were treated with epidermal growth factor (EGF) to evaluate DNA replication. Fluorescent ubiquitination-based cell cycle indicator (FUCCI) live-imaging system was used to visualise the phases of cell cycle. RESULTS Both global and liver-specific JCAD deficiency postponed liver regeneration after PH as indicated by reduced gene expression of cell cycle transition and DNA replication. Prolonged retention in G1 phase and failure to transition over the cell cycle checkpoint in JCAD-KO cell line was indicated by a FUCCI live-imaging system as well as pharmacologic blockage. JCAD replenishment by adenovirus reversed the impaired DNA synthesis in JCAD-KO primary hepatocyte in exposure to EGF, which was abrogated by a Yes-associated protein (YAP) inhibitor, verteporfin. Mechanistically, JCAD competed with large tumour suppressor 2 (LATS2) for WWC1 interaction, leading to LATS2 inhibition and thereafter YAP activation, and enhanced expression of cell cycle-associated genes. CONCLUSION JCAD deficiency led to delayed regeneration after PH as a result of blockage in cell cycle progression through the Hippo-YAP signalling pathway. These findings uncovered novel functions of JCAD and suggested a potential strategy for improving graft growth and function post liver transplantation. KEY POINTS JCAD deficiency leads to an impaired liver growth after PH due to cell division blockage. JCAD competes with LATS2 for WWC1 interaction, resulting in LATS2 inhibition, YAP activation and enhanced expression of cell cycle-associated genes. Delineation of JCADHippoYAP signalling pathway would facilitate to improve prognosis of acute liver failure and graft growth in living-donor liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Zhang
- Department of Medical Microbiology & ParasitologyMOE/NHC/CAMS Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular VirologySchool of Basic Medical SciencesFudan University Shanghai Medical CollegeShanghaiChina
| | - Yong‐Yu Yang
- Department of Medical Microbiology & ParasitologyMOE/NHC/CAMS Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular VirologySchool of Basic Medical SciencesFudan University Shanghai Medical CollegeShanghaiChina
| | - Li Xie
- Department of Medical Microbiology & ParasitologyMOE/NHC/CAMS Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular VirologySchool of Basic Medical SciencesFudan University Shanghai Medical CollegeShanghaiChina
| | - Yuan Zhou
- Department of Medical Microbiology & ParasitologyMOE/NHC/CAMS Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular VirologySchool of Basic Medical SciencesFudan University Shanghai Medical CollegeShanghaiChina
| | - Zhenxing Zhong
- Institute of PediatricsChildren's Hospital of Fudan UniversityShanghai Key Laboratory of Medical EpigeneticsInternational Co‐Laboratory of Medical Epigenetics and MetabolismInstitutes of Biomedical SciencesFudan University Shanghai Medical CollegeShanghaiChina
| | - Jia Ding
- Jing'an Central District HospitalShanghaiChina
| | - Zhong‐Hua Wang
- Department of Medical Microbiology & ParasitologyMOE/NHC/CAMS Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular VirologySchool of Basic Medical SciencesFudan University Shanghai Medical CollegeShanghaiChina
| | - Yu‐Li Wang
- Department of Medical Microbiology & ParasitologyMOE/NHC/CAMS Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular VirologySchool of Basic Medical SciencesFudan University Shanghai Medical CollegeShanghaiChina
| | - Xiu‐Ping Liu
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineSchool of Basic Medical SciencesFudan UniversityShanghaiChina
| | - Fa‐Xing Yu
- Institute of PediatricsChildren's Hospital of Fudan UniversityShanghai Key Laboratory of Medical EpigeneticsInternational Co‐Laboratory of Medical Epigenetics and MetabolismInstitutes of Biomedical SciencesFudan University Shanghai Medical CollegeShanghaiChina
| | - Jian Wu
- Department of Medical Microbiology & ParasitologyMOE/NHC/CAMS Key Laboratory of Medical Molecular VirologySchool of Basic Medical SciencesFudan University Shanghai Medical CollegeShanghaiChina
- Department of Gastroenterology & HepatologyZhongshan Hospital of Fudan UniversityShanghaiChina
- Shanghai Institute of Liver DiseasesFudan University Shanghai Medical CollegeShanghaiChina
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
В педиатрической практике трансплантация фрагментов печени позволяет достичь высоких результатов [Bowring M.G., 2020] и, при этом, полностью гарантировать безопасность родственных доноров. В то же время, при выполнении трансплантации «взрослый – ребенок», практически отсутствуют этические вопросы, поскольку, чаще всего, донором является один из родителей реципиента. Тем не менее, важной задачей остается создание условий для ускорения реабилитации и минимизации хирургической травмы у донора, в этой связи, внедрение миниинвазивных методов имеет особое значение.
В последние два десятилетия миниинвазивные подходы к резекциям печени прочно вошли в арсенал крупных гепатобилиарных центров. Это стало возможным благодаря накопленному опыту открытой хирургии печени, а также технологическому прогрессу [Morise Z., 2017]. Однако, применение лапароскопического подхода у родственных доноров фрагментов печени по-прежнему остается предметом живого интереса в трансплантологических центрах всего мира. Первые сравнительные исследования оказались весьма обнадеживающими и продемонстрировали перспективность этого подхода [Broering D. C., 2018]. Накопление подобного опыта, анализ кривой обучения, стандартизация хирургической техники по-прежнему являются важными вопросами развития данного направления.
В России лапароскопическое изъятие фрагмента печени для последующей трансплантации было впервые выполнено в ФГБУ «НМИЦ ТИО им. Академика В. И. Шумакова» в 2016 году. Также, в России впервые в мире произведено полностью лапароскопическое изъятие одновременно фрагмента печени и почки для последующей трансплантации детям [Готье С. В., 2016, Gautier S. V., 2019].
Цель исследования.
Оптимизация хирургической техники и результатов лапароскопического изъятия левого латерального сектора у прижизненных доноров фрагмента печени на основании анализа накопленного опыта.
Задачи исследования.
1. Сравнить результаты открытого и лапароскопического изъятия левого латерального сектора у прижизненных доноров.
2. Определить критерии селекции прижизненных доноров для лапароскопического изъятия левого латерального сектора печени.
3. Стандартизировать хирургическую технику выполнения лапароскопической латеральной секторэктомии печени.
4. Оценить результаты трансплантации левого латерального сектора, полученного открытым и лапароскопическим путём, у реципиентов.
5. Изучить кривую обучения выполнения лапароскопической латеральной секторэктомии печени у родственного донора.
Научная новизна.
На сегодняшний день, лапароскопическое изъятие левого латерального сектора печени у прижизненных доноров выполняется лишь в нескольких центрах в мире. Суммарный накопленный опыт по всему миру не превышает 500 операций. В настоящее время, по данным литературы, существует лишь несколько исследований, посвященных данной тематике. Проведение псевдорандомизации позволило объективизировать результаты и увеличить их достоверность. Изучение кривой обучения выполнения лапароскопической латеральной секторэктомии печени позволяет оценить потенциал внедрения данной методики в клинические центры.
Новыми являются данные сравнительного анализа клинических результатов проведения открытого и лапароскопического изъятия левого латерального сектора печени у живых доноров, а также сравнительного анализа результатов трансплантаций у реципиентов, получивших соответствующие трансплантаты.
Новыми являются разработанные рекомендации по селекции доноров для лапароскопического изъятия левого латерального сектора.
Впервые разработаны алгоритмы, протоколы и рекомендации по выполнению хирургического вмешательства лапароскопической резекции левого латерального сектора печени у родственного донора.
Практическая значимость исследования.
Впервые в России на основании доказательной медицины установлена клиническая эффективность и безопасность лапароскопической левой латеральной секторэктомии у прижизненных доноров фрагмента печени.
Разработана и стандартизирована хирургическая техника, позволяющая максимально снизить интра- и послеоперационные осложнения у доноров левого латерального сектора печени, а также получать трансплантаты высокого качества.
Внедрение научных разработок в клиническую практику позволит:
• обезопасить хиругическое пособие у доноров путем снижения интраоперационой кровопотери и минимизации хирургической травмы;
• ускорить послеоперационную реабилитацию у доноров;
• получить хороший косметический эффект после оперативного пособия.
Методология и методы исследования.
В исследовании проведен статистический анализ клинических данных, результатов оперативного вмешательства, лабораторных и инструментальных исследований до, во время и после резекции левого латерального сектора печени у родственных доноров и трансплантации левого латерального сектора
детям. Проведен статистический анализ клинических данных, результатов трансплантаций левого латерального сектора печени у реципиентов, получивших трансплантат от доноров, оперированных открыто и лапароскопически.
Основные положения, выносимые на защиту
1. Лапароскопическое изъятие левого латерального сектора является эффективным и безопасным методом, позволяющим уменьшить операционную травму и ускорить реабилитацию, а также получить хороший косметический эффект.
2. Результаты трансплантации левого латерального сектора печени детям от доноров, оперированных лапароскопически, сопоставимы с аналогичными от доноров, оперированных по классической открытой методике.
3. Унификация хирургической методики позволяет уменьшить длительность операции, а также позволяет добиться максимального снижения интра- и послеоперационных осложнений у доноров.
4. Более строгая селекция доноров для лапароскопического изъятия левого латерального сектора позволяет снизить риск интраоперационных осложнений на этапе становления методики и наработки хирургического опыта.
Степень достоверности и апробация результатов
Достоверность результатов определяется объемом проведенных исследований с использованием современных методов статистической обработки.
Апробация работы состоялась 15 июля 2020 года на совместной конференции научных и клинических подразделений федерального государственного бюджетного учреждения «Национальный медицинский исследовательский центр трансплантологии и искусственных органов имени академика В.И. Шумакова» Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации (ФГБУ «НМИЦ ТИО им. ак. В.И. Шумакова» Минздрава России) и кафедры трансплантологии и искусственных органов Института клинической медицины имени Н.В. Склифосовского Федерального государственного автономного образовательного учреждения высшего образования Первый осковский государственный медицинский университет имени И.М. Сеченова Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации (Сеченовский Университет).
Материалы диссертации доложены и обсуждены на III Российском национальном конгрессе «Трансплантация и донорство органов» (Москва 2017г.), на 15-м международном конгрессе по донорству органов (ISODP, Дубай, ОАЭ), на 10-м Всероссийском съезде трансплантологов (Москва, 2020 г.), и на международном съезде трансплантологического общества (The Transplantation Society, Сеул, Южная Корея, 2020г.).
Внедрение результатов исследования в практику
Результаты исследования используются в хирургическом отделении № 2 федерального государственного бюджетного учреждения «Национальный медицинский исследовательский центр трансплантологии и искусственных органов имени академика В.И. Шумакова» Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации, в отделении онкологии и детской хирургии федерального государственного бюджетного учреждения «Национальный медицинский исследовательский центр детской гематологии, онкологии и иммунологии имени Дмитрия Рогачёва» Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации, а также в образовательной программе кафедры трансплантологии и искусственных органов Института клинической медицины имени Н.В. Склифосовского Федерального государственного автономного образовательного учреждения высшего образования Первый осковский государственный медицинский университет имени И.М. Сеченова Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации (Сеченовский Университет).
Личный вклад автора.
Автор принимал непосредственное участие в разработке концепции и постановке задач исследования; в оперативных вмешательствах у родственных доноров печени и операциях по трансплантации печени; самостоятельно осуществлял сбор материала для исследования. Автором самостоятельно сформирована база данных, проведена статистическая обработка, анализ и интерпретация полученных результатов.
Публикации по теме диссертации
По теме диссертации опубликовано 15 научных работ, из них 3 статьи в центральных рецензируемых журналах, рекомендованных ВАК, а также 2 статьи в международных журналах.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- KO Semash
- V.I. Shumakov National Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wang B, Shen H, Wei Y, Liu F, Yang Y, Yu H, Fu J, Cui X, Yu T, Xu Y, Liu Y, Dong H, Shen F, Zhou W, Liu H, Chen Y, Wang H. Balance of Gata3 and Ramp2 in hepatocytes regulates hepatic vascular reconstitution in postoperative liver regeneration. J Hepatol 2024; 80:309-321. [PMID: 37918568 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2023.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2022] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) leads to poor prognosis in patients undergoing hepatectomy, with hepatic vascular reconstitution playing a critical role. However, the regulators of hepatic vascular reconstitution remain unclear. In this study, we aimed to investigate the regulatory mechanisms of hepatic vascular reconstitution and identify biomarkers predicting PHLF in patients undergoing hepatectomy. METHODS Candidate genes that were associated with hepatic vascular reconstitution were screened using adeno-associated virus vectors in Alb-Cre-CRISPR/Cas9 mice subjected to partial hepatectomy. The biological activities of candidate genes were estimated using endothelial precursor transfusion and associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) models. The level of candidates was detected in biopsies from patients undergoing ALPPS. Risk factors for PHLF were also screened using retrospective data. RESULTS Downregulation of Gata3 and upregulation of Ramp2 in hepatocytes promoted the proliferation of liver sinusoidal endothelial cells and hepatic revascularization. Pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF) and vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) played opposite roles in regulating the migration of endothelial precursors from bone marrow and the formation of new sinusoids after hepatectomy. Gata3 restricted endothelial cell function in patient-derived hepatic organoids, which was abrogated by a Gata3 inhibitor. Moreover, overexpression of Gata3 led to higher mortality in ALPPS mice, which was improved by a PEDF-neutralizing antibody. The expression of Gata3/RAMP and PEDF/VEGFA tended to have a negative correlation in patients undergoing ALPPS. A nomogram incorporating multiple factors, such as serum PEDF/VEGF index, was constructed and could efficiently predict the risk of PHLF. CONCLUSIONS The balance of Gata3 and Ramp2 in hepatocytes regulates the proliferation of liver sinusoidal endothelial cells and hepatic revascularization via changes in the expression of PEDF and VEGFA, revealing potential targets for the prevention and treatment of PHLF. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS In this study, we show that the balance of Gata3 and Ramp2 in hepatocytes regulates hepatic vascular reconstitution by promoting a shift from pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF) to vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) expression during hepatectomy- or ALLPS (associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy)-induced liver regeneration. We also identified serum PEDF/VEGFA index as a potential predictor of post-hepatectomy liver failure in patients who underwent hepatectomy. This study improves our understanding of how hepatocytes contribute to liver regeneration and provides new targets for the prevention and treatment of post-hepatectomy liver failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bibo Wang
- International Cooperation Laboratory on Signal Transduction, National Center for Liver Cancer, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory on Signaling Regulation and Targeting Therapy of Liver Cancer, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Hepato-biliary Tumor Biology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University/NAVAL Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China; Department of Medical Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medicine School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Hao Shen
- International Cooperation Laboratory on Signal Transduction, National Center for Liver Cancer, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory on Signaling Regulation and Targeting Therapy of Liver Cancer, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Hepato-biliary Tumor Biology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University/NAVAL Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China; Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yating Wei
- International Cooperation Laboratory on Signal Transduction, National Center for Liver Cancer, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory on Signaling Regulation and Targeting Therapy of Liver Cancer, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Hepato-biliary Tumor Biology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University/NAVAL Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China; Institute of Metabolism and Integrative Biology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
| | - Fuchen Liu
- The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University/NAVAL Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yuan Yang
- The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University/NAVAL Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Han Yu
- International Cooperation Laboratory on Signal Transduction, National Center for Liver Cancer, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory on Signaling Regulation and Targeting Therapy of Liver Cancer, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Hepato-biliary Tumor Biology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University/NAVAL Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China
| | - Jing Fu
- International Cooperation Laboratory on Signal Transduction, National Center for Liver Cancer, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory on Signaling Regulation and Targeting Therapy of Liver Cancer, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Hepato-biliary Tumor Biology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University/NAVAL Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China
| | - Xiuliang Cui
- International Cooperation Laboratory on Signal Transduction, National Center for Liver Cancer, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory on Signaling Regulation and Targeting Therapy of Liver Cancer, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Hepato-biliary Tumor Biology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University/NAVAL Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China
| | - Ting Yu
- International Cooperation Laboratory on Signal Transduction, National Center for Liver Cancer, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory on Signaling Regulation and Targeting Therapy of Liver Cancer, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Hepato-biliary Tumor Biology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University/NAVAL Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China; Department of Hepatology, Fuling Hospital, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China
| | - Ying Xu
- International Cooperation Laboratory on Signal Transduction, National Center for Liver Cancer, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory on Signaling Regulation and Targeting Therapy of Liver Cancer, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Hepato-biliary Tumor Biology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University/NAVAL Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China
| | - Yitian Liu
- International Cooperation Laboratory on Signal Transduction, National Center for Liver Cancer, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory on Signaling Regulation and Targeting Therapy of Liver Cancer, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Hepato-biliary Tumor Biology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University/NAVAL Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China
| | - Hui Dong
- International Cooperation Laboratory on Signal Transduction, National Center for Liver Cancer, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory on Signaling Regulation and Targeting Therapy of Liver Cancer, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Hepato-biliary Tumor Biology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University/NAVAL Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China
| | - Feng Shen
- The Fourth Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University/NAVAL Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Weiping Zhou
- The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University/NAVAL Medical University, Shanghai, China.
| | - Hui Liu
- The Third Department of Hepatic Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University/NAVAL Medical University, Shanghai, China.
| | - Yao Chen
- International Cooperation Laboratory on Signal Transduction, National Center for Liver Cancer, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory on Signaling Regulation and Targeting Therapy of Liver Cancer, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Hepato-biliary Tumor Biology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University/NAVAL Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China.
| | - Hongyang Wang
- International Cooperation Laboratory on Signal Transduction, National Center for Liver Cancer, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory on Signaling Regulation and Targeting Therapy of Liver Cancer, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Hepato-biliary Tumor Biology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University/NAVAL Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China; Institute of Metabolism and Integrative Biology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Samstein B, Cherqui D. Pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy: A nearly finished product. Am J Transplant 2024; 24:160-161. [PMID: 37619921 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.08.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Samstein
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
| | - Daniel Cherqui
- Hepatobiliary Center-Paul Brousse Hospital, APHP-Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Liu H, Sethi V, Li X, Xiao Y, Humar A. Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Narrative Review and A Glimpse into The Future. Semin Liver Dis 2024; 44:79-98. [PMID: 38211621 DOI: 10.1055/a-2242-7543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2024]
Abstract
Liver transplantation (LT) is a highly effective treatment for carefully selected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this review, we explored the development of LT selection criteria and organ allocation policies, comparing original data to underscore their historical progression into the intricate task of quantitatively estimating pre- and post-LT survivals. We emphasized the role of biomarkers such as serum alpha-fetoprotein, Des-gamma-carboxy-prothrombin, circulating tumor cells, and circulating tumor DNA in predicting patient outcomes. Additionally, we examined the transplant-associated survival benefits and the difficulties in accurately calculating these benefits. We also reviewed recent advancements in targeted therapy and checkpoint inhibitors for advanced, inoperable HCC and projected their integration into LT for HCC. We further discussed the growing use of living donor liver transplants in the United States and compared its outcomes with those of deceased donor liver transplants. Furthermore, we examined the progress in machine perfusion techniques, which have shown potential in improving patient outcomes and enlarging the donor pool. These advancements present opportunities to enhance LT patient survivals, refine selection criteria, establish new priority metrics, develop innovative bridging and downstaging strategies, and formulate redesigned LT strategies for HCC treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Liu
- Department of Surgery, Starzl Transplant Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Vrishketan Sethi
- Department of Surgery, Starzl Transplant Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Xingjie Li
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Yao Xiao
- Division of Transplant Surgery and Transplant Surgery Research Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Abhinav Humar
- Department of Surgery, Starzl Transplant Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Andacoglu OM, Wiser G, Zimmerman M, Buff M, Selim M, Baker T. A perspective and review on nondirected liver donation. Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken) 2024; 23:e0235. [PMID: 38961879 PMCID: PMC11221845 DOI: 10.1097/cld.0000000000000235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024] Open
|
17
|
Voskanyan SE, Kolyshev IY, Bashkov AN, Artemyev VI, Rudakov VS, Shabalin MV, Popov MV, Sushkov AI, Vohmyanin GV. Blood flow reconstruction in portal vein anatomical variations in right lobe living donor liver transplantation. TRANSPLANTOLOGIYA. THE RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION 2023; 15:426-438. [DOI: 10.23873/2074-0506-2023-15-4-426-438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2025]
Abstract
Background. Adequate restoration of blood flow through the portal vein in the graft is only possible with a clear understanding of its anatomy in the donor.The aim was to describe new and extend current data on the portal vein anatomy in a donor of the right liver lobe, to describe variants and formulate principles of portal reconstruction in right lobe living donor liver transplantation.Material and methods. 306 living donor liver transplantations were performed from 2009 to 2021 in the State Research Center – Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency. The vascular anatomy of 518 potential donors was analyzed. Portal vein variants of the anatomy of right lobe graft were assessed.Results. Nine types and 3 subtypes of portal vein branching were evaluated. A, B, C, D, E types match the types described earlier in Nakamura classification. Subtypes B1, B2 и D1 are specifications of types B and D. Types F, G, H, I have been described additionally. The incidence of types and subtypes where reconstruction was made: type A (82%), B (4.6%), B1 (3.9%), B2 (1.3%), C (3.9%), D (3.9%). The incidence of E, G, H, I types among 518 potential donors was 0.4%, 0.6%, 0.2%, 0.4%, respectively. The recipient portal vein complications were detected in 12 cases (3.9%), where 3(25%) were Class 3b according to Clavien-Dindo and 9(75%) of Clavien-Dindo Class 2. There were no correlations between portal vein complications and the method of portal vein reconstruction. (p<0.05). No complications occurred with portal vein in donors.Conclusion. The existing classification of right liver graft portal vein has been updated and detailed. A certain way of reconstruction has been proposed for each portal vein type. Anatomical types in which donation and transplantation are contraindicated have been specified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. E. Voskanyan
- State Research Center – Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency
| | - I. Yu. Kolyshev
- State Research Center – Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency
| | - A. N. Bashkov
- State Research Center – Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency
| | - V. I. Artemyev
- State Research Center – Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency
| | - V. S. Rudakov
- State Research Center – Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency
| | - M. V. Shabalin
- State Research Center – Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency
| | - M. V. Popov
- State Research Center – Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency
| | - A. I. Sushkov
- State Research Center – Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency
| | - G. V. Vohmyanin
- State Research Center – Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kim SH, Kim KH, Cho HD, Suh KS, Hong SK, Lee KW, Choi GS, Kim JM, Choon Hyuck David K, Cho JY, Han HS, Han J, Han YS. Donor Safety and Risk Factors of Pure Laparoscopic Living Donor Right Hepatectomy: A Korean Multicenter Study. Ann Surg 2023; 278:e1198-e1203. [PMID: 37395608 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to identify safety and risk factors of living donor after pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy in a Korean multicenter cohort study. BACKGROUND Pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy is not yet a standardized surgical procedure due to lack of data. METHODS This retrospective study included 543 patients undergoing PLRDH between 2010 and 2018 in 5 Korean transplantation centers. Complication rates were assessed and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors of open conversion, overall complications, major complications, and biliary complications. RESULTS Regarding open conversion, the incidence was 1.7% and the risk factor was body mass index >30 kg/m 2 [ P =0.001, odds ratio (OR)=22.72, 95% CI=3.56-146.39]. Rates of overall, major (Clavien-Dindo classification III-IV), and biliary complications were 9.2%, 4.4%, and 3.5%, respectively. For overall complications, risk factors were graft weight >700 g ( P =0.007, OR=2.66, 95% CI=1.31-5.41), estimated blood loss ( P <0.001, OR=4.84, 95% CI=2.50-9.38), and operation time >400 minutes ( P =0.01, OR=2.46, 95% CI=1.25-4.88). For major complications, risk factors were graft weight >700 g ( P =0.002, OR=4.01, 95% CI=1.67-9.62) and operation time >400 minutes ( P =0.003, OR=3.84, 95% CI=1.60-9.21). For biliary complications, risk factors were graft weight >700 g ( P =0.01, OR=4.34, 95% CI=1.40-13.45) and operation time >400 minutes ( P =0.01, OR=4.16, 95% CI=1.34-12.88). CONCLUSION Careful donor selection for PLRDH considering body mass index, graft weight, estimated blood loss, and operation time combined with skilled procedure can improve donor safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang-Hoon Kim
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ki-Hun Kim
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hwui-Dong Cho
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyung-Suk Suh
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Suk Kyun Hong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kwang-Woong Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Gyu-Seong Choi
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong Man Kim
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kwon Choon Hyuck David
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Jai Young Cho
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jaryung Han
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Kyungpook, National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
- Department of Surgery, Daegu Catholic University Hospital, School of Medicine Catholic University of Daegu, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Seok Han
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Kyungpook, National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
- Department of Surgery, Daegu Catholic University Hospital, School of Medicine Catholic University of Daegu, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Pillai A, Goldaracena N, Rosenblatt R, Verna EC. CAQ Corner: Evaluation and management of living liver donors. Liver Transpl 2023; 29:1118-1128. [PMID: 37243369 DOI: 10.1097/lvt.0000000000000183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Anjana Pillai
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Nicolas Goldaracena
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Russell Rosenblatt
- Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Elizabeth C Verna
- Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bonaccorsi-Riani E, Daudré-Vignier V, Ciccarelli O, Coubeau L, Iesari S, Castanares-Zapatero D, Collienne C, Annet L, Danse E, Balligand JL, Lefebvre C, Dieu A, Benoit L, Reding R. Improving Safety in Living Liver Donation: Lessons From Intraoperative Adverse Events in 438 Donors Undergoing a Left Liver Resection. Transplant Direct 2023; 9:e1531. [PMID: 37636484 PMCID: PMC10455133 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Revised: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Donor safety is paramount in living organ donation. Left liver resections are considered safer than right lobe hepatectomies. However, unexpected intraoperative adverse events (iAEs), defined as any deviation from the ideal intraoperative course, can also occur during left liver resections and may be life threatening or lead to postoperative complication or permanent harm to the donor and recipient. Methods Records of 438 liver living donors (LDs) who underwent 393 left lateral sectionectomies (LLSs) and 45 left hepatectomies (LHs) between July 1993 and December 2018 in a pediatric living-donor liver transplantation center were reviewed for the appearance of iAEs that could have influenced the donor morbidity and mortality and that could have contributed to the improvement of the LD surgical protocol. Results Clinical characteristics of LLS and LH groups were comparable. Nine iAEs were identified, an incidence of 2%, all of them occurring in the LLS group. Seven of them were related to a surgical maneuver (5 associated with vascular management and 2 with the biliary tree approach). One iAE was associated with an incomplete donor workup and the last with drug administration. Each iAE resulted in subsequent changes in the surgical protocol. Donor outcome was at risk by 5 iAEs classed as type a, recipient outcome by 2 iAEs (type b) and both by 2 iAEs (type c). Postoperative complications occurred in 87 LDs (19.9%), with no differences between the LLS and LH groups (P = 0.227). No Clavien-Dindo class IVa or b complications or donor mortality (Clavien-Dindo class V) were observed. Conclusions iAEs debriefings induced changes in our LD protocol and may have contributed to reduced morbidity and zero mortality. iAEs analysis can be used as a quality and safety improvement tool in the context of LD procedures, which may include right liver donation, laparoscopic, and robotic living liver graft procurement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eliano Bonaccorsi-Riani
- Transplantation and Abdominal Surgery Section, Department of Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
- Institute de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique – IREC, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Victoria Daudré-Vignier
- Transplantation and Abdominal Surgery Section, Department of Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Olga Ciccarelli
- Transplantation and Abdominal Surgery Section, Department of Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
- Institute de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique – IREC, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Laurent Coubeau
- Transplantation and Abdominal Surgery Section, Department of Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Samuele Iesari
- Kidney Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Christine Collienne
- Adult Intensive Care Unit, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Laurence Annet
- Department of Radiology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Etienne Danse
- Department of Radiology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jean-Luc Balligand
- Institute de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique – IREC, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Internal Medicine, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Chantal Lefebvre
- Institute de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique – IREC, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Internal Medicine, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Audrey Dieu
- Department of Anesthesia, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Loïc Benoit
- Department of Anesthesia, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Raymond Reding
- Transplantation and Abdominal Surgery Section, Department of Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences. Medical-ethical guidelines: Living donation of solid organs. Swiss Med Wkly 2023; 153:40126. [PMID: 37774384 DOI: 10.57187/smw.2023.40126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/01/2023] Open
Abstract
No abstract available.
Collapse
|
22
|
Kakos CD, Papanikolaou A, Ziogas IA, Tsoulfas G. Global dissemination of minimally invasive living donor hepatectomy: What are the barriers? World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15:776-787. [PMID: 37342850 PMCID: PMC10277954 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i5.776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Revised: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Minimally invasive donor hepatectomy (MIDH) is a relatively novel procedure that can potentially increase donor safety and contribute to faster rehabilitation of donors. After an initial period in which donor safety was not effectively validated, MIDH currently seems to provide improved results, provided that it is conducted by experienced surgeons. Appropriate selection criteria are crucial to achieve better outcomes in terms of complications, blood loss, operative time, and hospital stay. Beyond a pure laparoscopic technique, various approaches have been recommended such as hand-assisted, laparoscopic-assisted, and robotic donation. The latter has shown equal outcomes compared to open and laparoscopic approaches. A steep learning curve seems to exist in MIDH, mainly due to the fragility of the liver parenchyma and the experience needed for adequate control of bleeding. This review investigated the challenges and the opportunities of MIDH and the barriers to its global dissemination. Surgeons need expertise in liver transplantation, hepatobiliary surgery, and minimally invasive techniques to perform MIDH. Barriers can be categorized into surgeon-related, institutional-related, and accessibility. More robust data and the creation of international registries are needed for further evaluation of the technique and the acceptance from more centers worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christos Dimitrios Kakos
- Surgery Working Group, Society of Junior Doctors, Athens 15123, Greece
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Medicine, Thessaloniki 54622, Greece
| | - Angelos Papanikolaou
- Surgery Working Group, Society of Junior Doctors, Athens 15123, Greece
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States
| | - Ioannis A Ziogas
- Surgery Working Group, Society of Junior Doctors, Athens 15123, Greece
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, United States
| | - Georgios Tsoulfas
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Medicine, Thessaloniki 54622, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma. JOURNAL OF LIVER CANCER 2023; 23:1-120. [PMID: 37384024 PMCID: PMC10202234 DOI: 10.17998/jlc.2022.11.07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the fourth most common cancer among men in South Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle and old age. The current practice guidelines will provide useful and sensible advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 49 experts in the fields of hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology from the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2018 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions. These guidelines provide useful information and direction for all clinicians, trainees, and researchers in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Korean Liver Cancer Association (KLCA) and National Cancer Center (NCC) Korea
- Corresponding author: KLCA-NCC Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee (KPGRC) (Committee Chair: Joong-Won Park) Center for Liver and Pancreatobiliary Cancer, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang 10408, Korea Tel. +82-31-920-1605, Fax: +82-31-920-1520, E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Hackl F, Nazemian R, Saeed A, Cheah YL, Kaufman MD. Anesthesia and Enhanced Recovery for Robotic Living Donor Hepatectomy – A Narrative Review. JOURNAL OF LIVER TRANSPLANTATION 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.liver.2023.100148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/12/2023] Open
|
25
|
Kanneganti M, Olthoff KM, Bittermann T. Impact of Older Donor Age on Recipient and Graft Survival After LDLT: The US Experience. Transplantation 2023; 107:162-171. [PMID: 36042545 PMCID: PMC9771867 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of selecting older donors for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in the United States is incompletely studied, particularly in light of the recent expansion of LDLT nationally. METHODS Adult LDLTs from January 01, 2005 to December 31, 2019 were identified using the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Multivariable Cox models evaluated living donor (LD) age as a predictor of LDLT recipient and graft survival. The impact of increasing donor age on recipient outcomes was compared between LD and deceased donor recipients. Donor postoperative outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS There were 3539 LDLTs at 65 transplant centers during the study period. Despite the recent expansion of LDLT, the proportion of LDs aged ≥50 y was stable. There were no clinically significant differences in recipient or donor characteristics by LD age group. LD age ≥50 y was associated with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.49 ( P = 0.012) for recipient survival and 1.61 ( P < 0.001) for graft survival (vs LDs aged 18-29 y). The negative impact of increasing donor age on graft survival was more profound after LDLT than deceased donor liver transplantation (interaction P = 0.019). There was a possible increased rate of early donor biliary complications for donors >55 y (7.1% versus 3.1% for age <40 y; P = 0.156). CONCLUSIONS Increasing LD age is associated with decreased recipient and graft survival, although older donors still largely yield acceptable outcomes. Donor outcomes were not clearly impacted by increasing age, though this warrants further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mounika Kanneganti
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Kim M. Olthoff
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Therese Bittermann
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hirukawa K, Masuda Y, Abe Y, Yagi H, Ibuki S, Itano O, Shinoda M, Kitago M, Hasegawa Y, Hori S, Tanaka M, Nakano Y, Matsubara K, Obara H, Yamada Y, Kuroda T, Hibi T, Kitagawa Y. Standardized upfront Glissonean approach and liver hanging maneuver reduces bile leakage from the hepatic hilum in living donors. Liver Transpl 2023; 29:48-57. [PMID: 35848084 DOI: 10.1002/lt.26545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Revised: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 07/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Biliary complications after hepatectomy in living donors have yet to be eradicated. We hypothesized that a standardized upfront Glissonean approach and liver hanging maneuver (GH) would prevent mechanical and thermal injuries to the hilar plate of the remnant liver by determining the point of bile duct division and the final destination of hepatectomy preceding liver parenchymal transection (safety) and facilitate liver transection deep within the parenchyma and allow maximum length of hilar structures (rationality). GH was implemented in 2016 and its incidence of bile leakage was retrospectively compared against the conventional technique. GH comprises six steps: (1) development of the retrohepatic avascular plane between the right hepatic vein (RHV) and the middle hepatic vein (MHV) and isolation of the hepatic vein(s); (2) isolation of the right or left Glissonean pedicle with the corresponding Glissonean pedicles of the caudate lobe; (3) for right liver grafts and left liver grafts with the caudate lobe, passage of the tape for the liver hanging maneuver along the retrohepatic avascular plane and above the hilar plate, and for left liver grafts without the caudate lobe and for left lateral section grafts, passage of the tape from between the RHV and the MHV, along the Arantius ligament, and to the right of the umbilical portion; (4) liver transection; (5) isolation of hilar structures; and (6) graft procurement. Until 2020, 62 consecutive living donors underwent GH (success rate, 100%). The incidence of bile leakage from the hepatic hilum (0%) was significantly lower than that among 59 donors who underwent the conventional technique in 2011-2015 (9%; p = 0.01). In conclusion, GH is highly effective in reducing bile leakage from the hepatic hilum in living donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuya Hirukawa
- Department of Surgery , Keio University School of Medicine , Tokyo , Japan.,Department of Pediatric Surgery and Transplantation , Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medical Sciences , Kumamoto , Japan
| | - Yuki Masuda
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery , Tachikawa Hospital , Tokyo , Japan
| | - Yuta Abe
- Department of Surgery , Keio University School of Medicine , Tokyo , Japan
| | - Hiroshi Yagi
- Department of Surgery , Keio University School of Medicine , Tokyo , Japan
| | - Sho Ibuki
- Department of Surgery , Keio University School of Medicine , Tokyo , Japan.,Department of Surgery , Shonantobu General Hospital , Kanagawa , Japan
| | - Osamu Itano
- Department of Surgery , Keio University School of Medicine , Tokyo , Japan.,Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Gastrointestinal Surgery , International University of Health and Welfare School of Medicine , Chiba , Japan
| | - Masahiro Shinoda
- Department of Surgery , Keio University School of Medicine , Tokyo , Japan.,Digestive Diseases Center , International University of Health and Welfare , Mita Hospital , Tokyo , Japan
| | - Minoru Kitago
- Department of Surgery , Keio University School of Medicine , Tokyo , Japan
| | - Yasushi Hasegawa
- Department of Surgery , Keio University School of Medicine , Tokyo , Japan
| | - Shutaro Hori
- Department of Surgery , Keio University School of Medicine , Tokyo , Japan
| | - Masayuki Tanaka
- Department of Surgery , Keio University School of Medicine , Tokyo , Japan
| | - Yutaka Nakano
- Department of Surgery , Keio University School of Medicine , Tokyo , Japan
| | - Kentaro Matsubara
- Department of Surgery , Keio University School of Medicine , Tokyo , Japan
| | - Hideaki Obara
- Department of Surgery , Keio University School of Medicine , Tokyo , Japan
| | - Yohei Yamada
- Department of Pediatric Surgery , Keio University School of Medicine , Tokyo , Japan
| | - Tatsuo Kuroda
- Department of Pediatric Surgery , Keio University School of Medicine , Tokyo , Japan
| | - Taizo Hibi
- Department of Surgery , Keio University School of Medicine , Tokyo , Japan.,Department of Pediatric Surgery and Transplantation , Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medical Sciences , Kumamoto , Japan
| | - Yuko Kitagawa
- Department of Surgery , Keio University School of Medicine , Tokyo , Japan
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Incidental Detection of Neurovasular Bundle Compression by Dampening of Radial Artery Waveform in Pediatric Live Donor Liver Transplantation. JOURNAL OF LIVER TRANSPLANTATION 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.liver.2023.100143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
|
28
|
Huang M, Jiao J, Cai H, Zhang Y, Xia Y, Lin J, Shang Z, Qian Y, Wang F, Wu H, Kong X, Gu J. C-C motif chemokine ligand 5 confines liver regeneration by down-regulating reparative macrophage-derived hepatocyte growth factor in a forkhead box O 3a-dependent manner. Hepatology 2022; 76:1706-1722. [PMID: 35288960 PMCID: PMC9790589 DOI: 10.1002/hep.32458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Revised: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Liver regeneration (LR) is vital for the recovery of liver function after hepatectomy. Limited regeneration capacity, together with insufficient remnant liver volume, is a risk factor for posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) resulting from small-for-size syndrome. Although inflammation plays an important role in controlling LR, the underlying mechanisms still remain obscure. APPROACH AND RESULTS We identified C-C motif chemokine ligand (CCL) 5 as an important negative regulator for LR. CCL5 levels were elevated after partial hepatectomy (PHx), both in healthy donors of living donor liver transplantation (LT) and PHx mouse models. Ccl5 knockout mice displayed improved survival after 90% PHx and enhanced LR 36 h after 70% PHx. However, primary hepatocytes from Ccl5-/- mice exposed to growth factors in vitro showed no proliferation advantage compared to those from wild-type (WT) mice. Flow cytometry analysis showed that proportions of Ly6Clo macrophages were significantly increased in Ccl5-/- mice after 70% PHx. RNA-sequencing analysis revealed that sorted macrophages (CD11b+ Ly6Clo&hi ) manifested enhanced expression of reparative genes in Ccl5-/- mice compared to WT mice. Mechanistically, CCL5 induced macrophages toward proinflammatory Ly6Chi phenotype, thereby inhibiting the production of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) through the C-C motif chemokine receptor (CCR) 1- and CCR5-mediated forkhead box O (FoxO) 3a pathways. Finally, blockade of CCL5 greatly optimized survival and boosted LR in the mouse PHx model. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that inhibition of CCL5 is a promising strategy to improve regeneration restoration by enhancing HGF secretion from reparative macrophages through the FoxO3a pathway, which may potentially reduce the mortality of PHLF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miao Huang
- Department of TransplantationXinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineShanghaiChina.,Central LaboratoryDepartment of Liver DiseasesShuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Junzhe Jiao
- Central LaboratoryDepartment of Liver DiseasesShuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Hao Cai
- Department of TransplantationXinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Yichi Zhang
- Department of TransplantationXinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Yuhan Xia
- Department of TransplantationXinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Jiacheng Lin
- Central LaboratoryDepartment of Liver DiseasesShuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Zhi Shang
- Central LaboratoryDepartment of Liver DiseasesShuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Yihan Qian
- Central LaboratoryDepartment of Liver DiseasesShuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Fang Wang
- Central LaboratoryDepartment of Liver DiseasesShuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Hailong Wu
- 191610Shanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular ImagingShanghai University of Medicine and Health SciencesShanghaiChina
| | - Xiaoni Kong
- Central LaboratoryDepartment of Liver DiseasesShuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Jinyang Gu
- Department of TransplantationXinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineShanghaiChina
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Wu G, Liu C, Zhou X, Zhao L, Zhang W, Wang M, Zhao Q, Liang T. Short- and long-term complications after living donor ileal resection. Am J Transplant 2022; 22:3053-3060. [PMID: 36066568 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.17193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Revised: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Intestinal transplantation from deceased donors is the established procedure for patients with irreversible intestinal failure. However, a living-donor intestinal transplant has not been routinely performed yet because of undefined surgical risks to the donor. In this report, we reviewed our experience with living-donor ileal resection from May 1999 to December 2021. A total of 40 living-donor ileal resections were performed for 40 intestinal transplant recipients. Clinical data were prospectively collected and analyzed for postoperative complications after ileal procurement. None of the donors experienced life-threatening complications or mortality. Six (15%) of 40 donors experienced minor operative complications. Transit intestinal graft inadequacy including weight loss, diarrhea, and vitamin B12 deficiency was common early following surgery, but was manageable and disappeared in most cases within a year. All donors had significant reductions in total plasma cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations after donation as compared with the baseline levels. With an average follow-up of 67.8 months, bilateral kidney stones occurred in one donor and gallstones in the other. All the donors have regained their normal capacity for work. Living-donor ileal resection is associated with minimal short- and long-term morbidity and remains an attractive alternative for potential recipients when suitable deceased donors are unavailable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guosheng Wu
- Intestinal Transplant Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Chaoxu Liu
- Intestinal Transplant Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xile Zhou
- Intestinal Transplant Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Long Zhao
- Intestinal Transplant Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Wentong Zhang
- Intestinal Transplant Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Mian Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, the Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Qingchuan Zhao
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, the Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Tingbo Liang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.,Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Disease, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.,Zhejiang University Cancer Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
2022 KLCA-NCC Korea Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Korean J Radiol 2022; 23:1126-1240. [PMID: 36447411 PMCID: PMC9747269 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2022.0822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the fourth most common cancer among men in South Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle and old age. The current practice guidelines will provide useful and sensible advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 49 experts in the fields of hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology from the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2018 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions. These guidelines provide useful information and direction for all clinicians, trainees, and researchers in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
The dearth of deceased liver donors has created a supply demand gap, necessitating creation of living donor liver transplantation. However, living donor liver transplantation has relied on directed donation, whereby many potential directed donors are rejected based on ABO blood group incompatibility, hepatic size incompatibility, or the need for biliary or arterial reconstruction during transplant surgery. Much like kidney paired exchange, liver paired exchange (LPE) circumvents these incompatibility issues by relying on anonymous, nondirected, or bridge donors that are better anatomical or histological matches for recipients. Although Asia has taken the lead in LPE, the process has only recently been adopted in North America, with the first successful surgery done in the United States in 2019. Our review article sheds light on the process of LPE and the success of LPE in the United States thus far and, additionally, highlights the several logistical and ethical challenges that must be considered as transplant centers adopt and scale up LPE across the United States to address the increased demand for liver allografts.
Collapse
|
32
|
Vargas PA, Goldaracena N. Right vs Left Hepatectomy for LDLT, Safety and Regional Preference. CURRENT TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s40472-022-00386-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
|
33
|
Mazzola A, Pittau G, Hong SK, Chinnakotla S, Tautenhahn HM, Maluf DG, Settmacher U, Spiro M, Raptis DA, Jafarian A, Cherqui D. When is it safe for the liver donor to be discharged home and prevent unnecessary re-hospitalizations? - A systematic review of the literature and expert panel recommendations. Clin Transplant 2022; 36:e14677. [PMID: 35429941 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few data are available on discharge criteria after living liver donation (LLD). OBJECTIVES To identify the features for fit for discharge checklist after LLD to prevent unnecessary re-hospitalizations and to provide international expert recommendations. DATA SOURCES Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central. METHODS Systematic review following PRISMA guidelines and recommendations using the GRADE approach derived from an international expert panel. The critical outcomes included were complications rates and liver function (defined by elevated bilirubin and INR) (CRD42021260725). RESULTS Total 57/1710 studies were included in qualitative analysis and 28/57 on the final analysis. No randomized controlled trials were identified. The complications rate was reported in 20/28 studies and ranged from 7.8% to 71.2%. Post hepatectomy liver function was reported in 13 studies. The Quality of Evidence (QoE) was Low and Very-Low for complications rate and liver function test, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Monitoring and prevention of donor complications should be crucial in decision making of discharge. Pain and diet control, removal of all drains and catheters, deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis, and use routine imaging (CT scan or liver ultrasound) before discharge should be included as fit for discharge checklist (QoE; Low | GRADE of recommendation; Strong). Transient Impaired liver function (defined by elevated bilirubin and INR), a prognostic marker of outcome after liver resection, usually occurs after donor right hepatectomy and should be monitored. Improving trends for bilirubin and INR value should be observed by day 5 post hepatectomy and be included in the fit for discharge checklist. (QoE; Very-Low | GRADE; Strong).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Mazzola
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Liver transplant unit, Pité-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Gabriella Pittau
- Liver transplant unit, Centre hépato biliaire Hopital Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France
| | - Suk Kyun Hong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Srinath Chinnakotla
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, USA
| | | | - Daniel G Maluf
- Program in Transplantation, University of Maryland Medical School, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Utz Settmacher
- Department of General-, Visceral-, and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Michael Spiro
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.,Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Dimitri Aristotle Raptis
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.,Clinical Service of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Ali Jafarian
- Division HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Daniel Cherqui
- Liver transplant unit, Centre hépato biliaire Hopital Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Mol Hepatol 2022; 28:583-705. [PMID: 36263666 PMCID: PMC9597235 DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2022.0294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 161] [Impact Index Per Article: 53.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the fourth most common cancer among men in South Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle and old age. The current practice guidelines will provide useful and sensible advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 49 experts in the fields of hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology from the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2018 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions. These guidelines provide useful information and direction for all clinicians, trainees, and researchers in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.
Collapse
|
35
|
Erkoç SK, Kırımker EO, Büyük S, Baskan EB, Yılmaz AA, Balcı D, Karayalçın K, Bayar MK. Reducing Risk for Acute Kidney Injury After Living Donor Hepatectomy by Protocolized Fluid Restriction: Single-Center Experience. Transplant Proc 2022; 54:2243-2247. [PMID: 36088129 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Revised: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a potential complication after restricted fluid therapy for major surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of AKI for living liver donor hepatectomy in which applied intraoperative protocolized fluid restriction was used targeting a low central venous pressure (CVP) level with high pulse pressure variation (PPV) and systolic pressure variation (SPV). MATERIAL AND METHODS Living liver donors were admitted for this retrospective observational study. Low CVP <5 mm Hg with high PPV<20% and SPV<15% were the targets of the clinical protocol to reduce intraoperative blood loss via protocolized fluid management until the end of the hepatic parenchymal division. KDIGO criteria were used for AKI definition. The SPSS version 11.5 program was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS The study included 130 patients, 79 (60.8%) men and 51 (39.2%) women, with from 18 to 58 years of age. Donors underwent right and left lobe hepatectomies (116 and 14, respectively). The baseline CVP, the lowest CVP of hepatectomy, and the highest CVP measured after hepatectomy were 7.45 ± 2.41, 4.28 ± 1.12, 7.67 ± 2.09 mm Hg, respectively. Only 4 patients with right lobe hepatectomy developed AKI stage I (3.1%) in the first 24 hours. The 4 patients were recovered at 48 hours postoperatively. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated that a CVP target of <5 mm Hg and high PPV/SPV via a simple fluid management modality with protocolized-fluid restriction until the procurement may not cause AKI in living liver donors in a closed follow-up anesthesia approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elvan Onur Kırımker
- Ankara University School of Medicine, Department of General Surgery, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Sevcan Büyük
- Ankara University School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Elif Beyza Baskan
- Ankara University School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ali Abbas Yılmaz
- Ankara University School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Deniz Balcı
- Ankara University School of Medicine, Department of General Surgery, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Kaan Karayalçın
- Ankara University School of Medicine, Department of General Surgery, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Kemal Bayar
- Ankara University School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abdel-Khalek EE, Abdel-Wahab M, Elgazzar MH, Khattab MA, El-Gilany AH, Elgouhari HM, Shehta A. Long-term follow-up of living liver donors: A single-center experience. Liver Transpl 2022; 28:1490-1499. [PMID: 35289076 DOI: 10.1002/lt.26455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2021] [Revised: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Living donors are healthy individuals who are exposed to a major surgical procedure during which a major part of their liver is resected. Data on the long-term consequences of living liver donation are scarce. This study examined clinical, laboratory, and long-term health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in 237 living liver donors and 239 matched controls during 48-168 months of postdonation follow-up. We used the 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36), version 1. The scores for the four following subscales were higher in nondonors than in donors: physical functioning (p = 0.009), role limitations due to physical health (p = 0.002), energy/fatigue (p < 0.001), and bodily pain (p < 0.001). The scores on the eight subscales of the SF-36 were higher in donors with living recipients than in donors whose recipients died (p < 0.001). Our results suggest that living donor right hepatectomy is safe and results in a postdonation HRQoL similar to that of nondonors in those donors whose recipients are healthy, whereas donors whose recipients die have a lower HRQoL that is significantly negatively correlated with the time since recipient death and improves over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ehab E Abdel-Khalek
- Liver Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Mansoura, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Mohamed Abdel-Wahab
- Liver Transplant Unit, Gastrointestinal Surgery Center, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Mansoura, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Mohamed H Elgazzar
- Liver Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Mansoura, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Mahmoud A Khattab
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Minia, Minia, Egypt
| | - Abdel-Hady El-Gilany
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Mansoura, Mansoura, Egypt
| | | | - Ahmed Shehta
- Liver Transplant Unit, Gastrointestinal Surgery Center, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Mansoura, Mansoura, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Jackson WE, Malamon JS, Kaplan B, Saben JL, Schold JD, Pomposelli JJ, Pomfret EA. Survival Benefit of Living-Donor Liver Transplant. JAMA Surg 2022; 157:926-932. [PMID: 35921119 PMCID: PMC9350845 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.3327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Importance Despite the acceptance of living-donor liver transplant (LDLT) as a lifesaving procedure for end-stage liver disease, it remains underused in the United States. Quantification of lifetime survival benefit and the Model for End-stage Liver Disease incorporating sodium levels (MELD-Na) score range at which benefit outweighs risk in LDLT is necessary to demonstrate its safety and effectiveness. Objective To assess the survival benefit, life-years saved, and the MELD-Na score at which that survival benefit was obtained for individuals who received an LDLT compared with that for individuals who remained on the wait list. Design, Setting, and Participants This case-control study was a retrospective, secondary analysis of the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database of 119 275 US liver transplant candidates and recipients from January 1, 2012, to September 2, 2021. Liver transplant candidates aged 18 years or older who were assigned to the wait list (N = 116 455) or received LDLT (N = 2820) were included. Patients listed for retransplant or multiorgan transplant and those with prior kidney or liver transplants were excluded. Exposures Living-donor liver transplant vs remaining on the wait list. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome of this study was life-years saved from receiving an LDLT. Secondary outcomes included 1-year relative mortality and risk, time to equal risk, time to equal survival, and the MELD-Na score at which that survival benefit was obtained for individuals who received an LDLT compared with that for individuals who remained on the wait list. MELD-Na score ranges from 6 to 40 and is well correlated with short-term survival. Higher MELD-Na scores (>20) are associated with an increased risk of death. Results The mean (SD) age of the 119 275 study participants was 55.1 (11.2) years, 63% were male, 0.9% were American Indian or Alaska Native, 4.3% were Asian, 8.2% were Black or African American, 15.8% were Hispanic or Latino, 0.2% were Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, and 70.2% were White. Mortality risk and survival models confirmed a significant survival benefit for patients receiving an LDLT who had a MELD-Na score of 11 or higher (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.47-0.88]; P = .006). Living-donor liver transplant recipients gained an additional 13 to 17 life-years compared with patients who never received an LDLT. Conclusions and Relevance An LDLT is associated with a substantial survival benefit to patients with end-stage liver disease even at MELD-Na scores as low as 11. The findings of this study suggest that the life-years gained are comparable to or greater than those conferred by any other lifesaving procedure or by a deceased-donor liver transplant. This study's findings challenge current perceptions regarding when LDLT survival benefit occurs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Whitney E Jackson
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.,Colorado Center for Transplantation Care, Research, and Education, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| | - John S Malamon
- Colorado Center for Transplantation Care, Research, and Education, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.,Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| | - Bruce Kaplan
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.,Colorado Center for Transplantation Care, Research, and Education, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.,Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| | - Jessica L Saben
- Colorado Center for Transplantation Care, Research, and Education, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.,Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| | - Jesse D Schold
- Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - James J Pomposelli
- Colorado Center for Transplantation Care, Research, and Education, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.,Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| | - Elizabeth A Pomfret
- Colorado Center for Transplantation Care, Research, and Education, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.,Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kim SH, Park JH, An BH. Minimal Surgical Manpower for Living Donor Liver Transplantation. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11154292. [PMID: 35893383 PMCID: PMC9331439 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11154292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Revised: 07/20/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is widely performed with good outcomes in the current era of improved surgical techniques. However, few studies have addressed how many human resources are required in the surgery itself. This study aimed to introduce how to perform LDLT with minimal manpower and evaluate the outcomes in adult patients. Methods: The main surgical procedures of donor and recipient operations of LDLT were performed by a single specialist surgeon who led a team of minimal manpower that only included one fellow, one resident, one intern, and three nurses. He also provided postsurgical care and followed up all the patients as a primary care physician. The outcomes were analyzed from the standpoints of the feasibility and acceptability. Results: Between November 2018 and February 2020, a total of 47 patients underwent LDLT. Ten patients had ABO-incompatible donors. The median age of the overall recipients was 57 years old (36–71); 37 patients (78.7%) were male. The MELD score was 10 (6–40), and the main etiologies were hepatic malignancy (38 patients or 80.9%) and liver failure (9 patients or 19.1%). The median age of the overall donors was 34 years old (19–62); 22 patients (46.8%) were male. All the graft types were right liver except for one case of extended right liver with middle hepatic vein. All donors had an uneventful recovery with no complications. There was one intraoperative mortality due to cardiac arrest after reperfusion in one recipient. Hepatic artery thrombosis was developed in 5 (10.6%) recipients. An acute rejection episode occurred in one patient. The median follow-up period for all the patients was 32.9 months (range, 24.7–39.8). Biliary complications were developed in 11 (23.4%) recipients. In total, 7 (15%) patients died, including 1 intraoperative mortality, 5 from cancer recurrence, and 1 from intracranial hemorrhage. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival rates in the recipient group were 91.5%, 87.2%, and 85.1%, respectively. Conclusions: LDLT with minimal surgical manpower is feasible under the supervision of a single expert surgeon who has the capacity for all the main surgical procedures in both donor and recipient operations without compromising the outcomes in the present era of advanced surgical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seoung Hoon Kim
- Correspondence: or ; Tel.: +82-31-9201647; Fax: +82-31-9201138
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Paired Exchange Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Nine-year Experience From North India. Transplantation 2022; 106:2193-2199. [PMID: 35777310 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Paired exchange liver transplantation is an evolving strategy to overcome ABO blood group incompatibility and other barriers such as inadequate graft-to-recipient weight ratio and low remnant liver volume in donors. However, for the transplant team to carry 4 major operations simultaneously is a Herculean effort. We analyzed our experience with liver paired exchange (LPE) program over the past 9 y. METHODS This prospective study included 34 of 2340 (1.45%) living donor liver transplantations performed between May 2012 and April 2021. The reason for LPE was ABO incompatibility in all (n = 34) patients included in the study. After donor reassignment through 2-by-2 paired exchange with directed donors, the ABO matching status changed from A to A (n = 17) and B to B (n = 17), which made all matches ABO-identical. Recipients (R) and donors (D) of each swap pair were prospectively divided into R1/D1 and R2/D2 groups for comparative and survival analyses. RESULTS The recipients (n = 34) had a median age of 45.5 y (11-59 y), and 31 were men. LPEs were performed in 4 operating rooms running simultaneously by 2 independent surgical teams. Donor survival was 100%. Baseline clinical and perioperative parameters, postoperative complications, median intensive care unit/hospital stay, and early deaths were comparable (P > 0.1) between the R1 and R2 groups. The median follow-up period was 27 mo (1-108 mo). The 30-d and 1-y survivals were 88.2% (n = 30) and 85.3% (n = 29), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our experience suggests that with careful attention to ethical and logistical issues, the LPE program can expand the living donor liver pool and facilitate a greater number of living donor liver transplantations.
Collapse
|
40
|
Obed D, Jarrad A, Othman MI, Siyam M, Bashir A, Obed A. Hepatic and portal vein transection by vascular stapler in open living donor hepatectomy – A retrospective cohort study. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2022; 78:103823. [PMID: 35734708 PMCID: PMC9206906 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2022] [Revised: 05/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In an effort to increase donor safety in living donor liver transplantation, the utilization of vascular staplers for the division of the right portal and hepatic veins in patients undergoing right lobe liver donation for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) was implemented. In here we report our experience with vascular staplers in patients undergoing LDLT and evaluate the subsequent feasibility and safety for donors. Material and methods 17 cases of living donor liver transplant were retrospectively analyzed. The right portal vein was transected directly at the bifurcation of the main portal vein, the right hepatic vein was resected directly at the wall of the inferior vena cava using a vascular stapler device. Results We registered a complication rate of 41.2% (7 donors). According to the Clavien-Dindo classification, grade II and grade III complications were each observed in 5.9% and grade IIIb complications in 29.4%, whereas catastrophic bleeding, complications with residual disability or the necessity of re-laparatomy did not occur. Upon 6 weeks, all donors were able to return to their previous occupation in fully recovered condition. Conclusions The utilization of vascular staplers in donors during open LDLT presents an encouraging alternative to manual over-sewing of vascular stumps. Apart from its timesaving aspect, the technique reduces the potential risk of life-threatening clamp slippage with subsequent uncontrolled blood loss.
Portal or hepatic vein injuries are severe complications in liver transplant. Vascular staplers were used in an effort to increase donor safety. Hepatic or portal vein injuries or bleeding did not occur when using staplers. Vascular staplers may be a safe alternative to manual vascular sewing. Their use may be timesaving and reduce the risk of clamp slippage.
Collapse
|
41
|
Lincango Naranjo EP, Garces-Delgado E, Siepmann T, Mirow L, Solis-Pazmino P, Alexander-Leon H, Restrepo-Rodas G, Mancero-Montalvo R, Ponce CJ, Cadena-Semanate R, Vargas-Cordova R, Herrera-Cevallos G, Vallejo S, Liu-Sanchez C, Prokop LJ, Ziogas IA, Vailas MG, Guerron AD, Visser BC, Ponce OJ, Barbas AS, Moris D. Robotic Living Donor Right Hepatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11092603. [PMID: 35566727 PMCID: PMC9103024 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11092603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Revised: 04/23/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022] Open
Abstract
The introduction of robotics in living donor liver transplantation has been revolutionary. We aimed to examine the safety of robotic living donor right hepatectomy (RLDRH) compared to open (ODRH) and laparoscopic (LADRH) approaches. A systematic review was carried out in Medline and six additional databases following PRISMA guidelines. Data on morbidity, postoperative liver function, and pain in donors and recipients were extracted from studies comparing RLDRH, ODRH, and LADRH published up to September 2020; PROSPERO (CRD42020214313). Dichotomous variables were pooled as risk ratios and continuous variables as weighted mean differences. Four studies with a total of 517 patients were included. In living donors, the postoperative total bilirubin level (MD: −0.7 95%CI −1.0, −0.4), length of hospital stay (MD: −0.8 95%CI −1.4, −0.3), Clavien−Dindo complications I−II (RR: 0.5 95%CI 0.2, 0.9), and pain score at day > 3 (MD: −0.6 95%CI −1.6, 0.4) were lower following RLDRH compared to ODRH. Furthermore, the pain score at day > 3 (MD: −0.4 95%CI −0.8, −0.09) was lower after RLDRH when compared to LADRH. In recipients, the postoperative AST level was lower (MD: −0.5 95%CI −0.9, −0.1) following RLDRH compared to ODRH. Moreover, the length of stay (MD: −6.4 95%CI −11.3, −1.5) was lower after RLDRH when compared to LADRH. In summary, we identified low- to unclear-quality evidence that RLDRH seems to be safe and feasible for adult living donor liver transplantation compared to the conventional approaches. No postoperative deaths were reported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eddy P. Lincango Naranjo
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (E.P.L.N.); (S.V.); (O.J.P.)
- Department of Teaching and Research, Hospital Vozandes Quito, Quito 170521, Ecuador
- Equipo de Investigación de la Sociedad Ecuatoriana de Cirugía Bariátrica y Metabólica (SECBAMET), Quito 170508, Ecuador; (E.G.-D.); (H.A.-L.); (G.R.-R.); (R.M.-M.); (C.J.P.); (R.C.-S.); (R.V.-C.); (G.H.-C.)
- Division of Health Care Sciences, Center for Clinical Research and Management Education, Dresden International University, 01067 Dresden, Germany;
| | - Estefany Garces-Delgado
- Equipo de Investigación de la Sociedad Ecuatoriana de Cirugía Bariátrica y Metabólica (SECBAMET), Quito 170508, Ecuador; (E.G.-D.); (H.A.-L.); (G.R.-R.); (R.M.-M.); (C.J.P.); (R.C.-S.); (R.V.-C.); (G.H.-C.)
- Medical School, Universidad Internacional del Ecuador, Quito 170411, Ecuador
| | - Timo Siepmann
- Division of Health Care Sciences, Center for Clinical Research and Management Education, Dresden International University, 01067 Dresden, Germany;
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Lutz Mirow
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Medical Campus Chemnitz of the TU Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany;
| | - Paola Solis-Pazmino
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA;
| | - Harold Alexander-Leon
- Equipo de Investigación de la Sociedad Ecuatoriana de Cirugía Bariátrica y Metabólica (SECBAMET), Quito 170508, Ecuador; (E.G.-D.); (H.A.-L.); (G.R.-R.); (R.M.-M.); (C.J.P.); (R.C.-S.); (R.V.-C.); (G.H.-C.)
- Medical School, Universidad de las Américas, Quito 170503, Ecuador
| | - Gabriela Restrepo-Rodas
- Equipo de Investigación de la Sociedad Ecuatoriana de Cirugía Bariátrica y Metabólica (SECBAMET), Quito 170508, Ecuador; (E.G.-D.); (H.A.-L.); (G.R.-R.); (R.M.-M.); (C.J.P.); (R.C.-S.); (R.V.-C.); (G.H.-C.)
- Medical School, Universidad Internacional del Ecuador, Quito 170411, Ecuador
| | - Rafael Mancero-Montalvo
- Equipo de Investigación de la Sociedad Ecuatoriana de Cirugía Bariátrica y Metabólica (SECBAMET), Quito 170508, Ecuador; (E.G.-D.); (H.A.-L.); (G.R.-R.); (R.M.-M.); (C.J.P.); (R.C.-S.); (R.V.-C.); (G.H.-C.)
- Medical School, Universidad Internacional del Ecuador, Quito 170411, Ecuador
| | - Cristina J. Ponce
- Equipo de Investigación de la Sociedad Ecuatoriana de Cirugía Bariátrica y Metabólica (SECBAMET), Quito 170508, Ecuador; (E.G.-D.); (H.A.-L.); (G.R.-R.); (R.M.-M.); (C.J.P.); (R.C.-S.); (R.V.-C.); (G.H.-C.)
- Medical School, Universidad Internacional del Ecuador, Quito 170411, Ecuador
| | - Ramiro Cadena-Semanate
- Equipo de Investigación de la Sociedad Ecuatoriana de Cirugía Bariátrica y Metabólica (SECBAMET), Quito 170508, Ecuador; (E.G.-D.); (H.A.-L.); (G.R.-R.); (R.M.-M.); (C.J.P.); (R.C.-S.); (R.V.-C.); (G.H.-C.)
- Medical School, Universidad Internacional del Ecuador, Quito 170411, Ecuador
| | - Ronnal Vargas-Cordova
- Equipo de Investigación de la Sociedad Ecuatoriana de Cirugía Bariátrica y Metabólica (SECBAMET), Quito 170508, Ecuador; (E.G.-D.); (H.A.-L.); (G.R.-R.); (R.M.-M.); (C.J.P.); (R.C.-S.); (R.V.-C.); (G.H.-C.)
- Division of Metabolic and Weight Loss Surgery, Hospital General San Francisco IESS, Quito 170111, Ecuador
| | - Glenda Herrera-Cevallos
- Equipo de Investigación de la Sociedad Ecuatoriana de Cirugía Bariátrica y Metabólica (SECBAMET), Quito 170508, Ecuador; (E.G.-D.); (H.A.-L.); (G.R.-R.); (R.M.-M.); (C.J.P.); (R.C.-S.); (R.V.-C.); (G.H.-C.)
- Division of Metabolic and Weight Loss Surgery, Hospital Metropolitano, Quito 170521, Ecuador
| | - Sebastian Vallejo
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (E.P.L.N.); (S.V.); (O.J.P.)
| | - Carolina Liu-Sanchez
- Instituto de Medicina Tropical Alexander von Humboldt, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima 15102, Peru;
| | - Larry J. Prokop
- Mayo Clinic Libraries, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA;
| | - Ioannis A. Ziogas
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA;
| | - Michail G. Vailas
- 1st Department of Surgery, Laikon General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece;
| | - Alfredo D. Guerron
- Division of Metabolic and Weight Loss Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705, USA;
| | - Brendan C. Visser
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA;
| | - Oscar J. Ponce
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (E.P.L.N.); (S.V.); (O.J.P.)
- Frimley Park Hospital, Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust, Surrey GU16 7UJ, UK
| | | | - Dimitrios Moris
- Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705, USA;
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Sakai T, Ko JS, Crouch CE, Kumar S, Choi GS, Hackl F, Han DH, Kaufman M, Kim SH, Luzzi C, McCluskey S, Shin WJ, Sirianni J, Song KW, Sullivan C, Hendrickse A. Perioperative management of living donor liver transplantation: Part 2 - Donors. Clin Transplant 2022; 36:e14690. [PMID: 35477939 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Revised: 02/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Living donor liver transplantation was first developed to mitigate the limited access to deceased donor organs in Asia in the 1990s. This alternative liver transplantation method has become a widely practiced and established transplantation option for adult patients suffering with end-stage liver disease, and it has successfully helped address the shortage of deceased donors. The Society for the Advancement of Transplant Anesthesia and the Korean Society of Transplantation Anesthesiologists jointly reviewed published studies on the perioperative management of adult live liver donors undergoing donor hemi-hepatectomy. The goal of the review is to offer transplant anesthesiologists and critical care physicians a comprehensive overview of the perioperative management of adult live donors. We featured the current status, donor selection process, outcomes and complications, surgical procedure, anesthetic management, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols, avoidance of blood transfusion, and considerations for emergency donation. Recent surgical advances, including laparoscopic donor hemi-hepatectomy and robotic laparoscopic donor surgery, are also addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tetsuro Sakai
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.,Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.,McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Justin Sangwook Ko
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Cara E Crouch
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Sathish Kumar
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Gyu-Seong Choi
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Florian Hackl
- Department of Anesthesiology and Interventional Pain Management, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Dai Hoon Han
- Department of HBP Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Michael Kaufman
- Department of Anesthesiology and Interventional Pain Management, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Seong Hoon Kim
- Organ Transplantation Center, National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Carla Luzzi
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stuart McCluskey
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Won Jung Shin
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Joel Sirianni
- Department of Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Ki Won Song
- Department of Hepato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Asan Medical Center, Ulsan University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Cinnamon Sullivan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Adrian Hendrickse
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Living donor liver transplants (LDLTs) including those from nondirected donors (NDDs) have increased during the past decade, and center-level variations in LDLTs have not yet been described. We sought to quantify changes in the volume of NDD transplants over time and variation in NDD volume between transplant centers. We further examined characteristics of living liver donors and identified factors potentially associated with receiving an NDD liver transplant. METHODS Using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data between March 01, 2002, and December 31, 2020, we compared 173 NDDs with 5704 DLDs and 167 NDD recipients with 1153 waitlist candidates. RESULTS NDDs increased from 1 (0.4% of LDLTs) in 2002 to 58 (12% of LDLTs) in 2020. Of 150 transplant centers, 35 performed at least 1 NDD transplant. Compared with waitlist candidates, adult NDD recipients were less frequently males (39% versus 62%, P < 0.001), had a lower model for end-stage liver disease (16 versus 18, P = 0.01), and spent fewer days on the waitlist (173 versus 246, P = 0.02). Compared with waitlist candidates, pediatric NDD recipients were younger (50% versus 12% age <2 y, P < 0.001) and more often diagnosed with biliary atresia (66% versus 41%, P < 0.001). Compared with DLDs, NDDs were older (40 versus 35 y, P < 0.001), college educated (83% versus 64%, P < 0.001), White (92% versus 78%, P < 0.001), and more frequently donated left-lateral segment grafts (32.0% versus 14%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Liver NDD transplants continue to expand but remain concentrated at a few centers. Graft distribution favors female adults and pediatric patients with biliary atresia. Racial inequities in adult or pediatric center-level NDD graft distribution were not observed.
Collapse
|
44
|
Sim JH, Kwon HM, Jun IG, Kim SH, Kim KS, Moon YJ, Song JG, Hwang GS. Association of skeletal muscle index with postoperative acute kidney injury in living donor hepatectomy: A retrospective single-centre cohort study. Liver Int 2022; 42:425-434. [PMID: 34817911 DOI: 10.1111/liv.15109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Revised: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is the standard treatment option for patients with end-stage liver disease, it always entails ethical concerns about the risk of living donors. Recent studies have reported a correlation between sarcopenia and surgical prognosis in recipients. However, there are few studies of donor sarcopenia and the surgical prognosis of donors. This study investigated the association between sarcopenia and postoperative acute kidney injury in liver donors. METHODS This retrospective study analysed 2892 donors who underwent donor hepatectomy for LDLT between January 2008 and January 2018. Sarcopenia was classified into pre-sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia, which were determined to be -1 standard deviation (SD), and -2 SD from the mean baseline of the skeletal muscle index, respectively. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between donor sarcopenia and postoperative AKI. Additionally, we assessed the association between donor sarcopenia and delayed recovery of liver function (DRHF). RESULTS In the multivariate analysis, donor sarcopenia was significantly associated a higher incidence of postoperative AKI (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 2.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15-6.11, P = .022 in pre-sarcopenia, OR: 5.59, 95% CI: 1.11-28.15, P = .037 in severe sarcopenia, respectively). Additionally, hypertension and synthetic colloid use were significantly associated with postoperative AKI. In the multivariate analysis, risk factors of DRHF were male gender, indocyanine green retention rate at 15 minutes, and graft type, however, donor sarcopenia was not a risk factor. CONCLUSIONS Donor sarcopenia is associated with postoperative AKI following donor hepatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji-Hoon Sim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hye-Mee Kwon
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - In-Gu Jun
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung-Hoon Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyoung-Sun Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Young-Jin Moon
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jun-Gol Song
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Gyu-Sam Hwang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Skogsberg Dahlgren U, Herlenius G, Gustafsson B, Mölne J, Rydberg L, Socratous A, Bennet W. Excellent outcome following emergency deceased donor ABO-incompatible liver transplantation using rituximab and antigen specific immunoadsorption. Scand J Gastroenterol 2022; 57:50-59. [PMID: 34541993 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2021.1976269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The acceptance of ABO-incompatible (ABOi) liver grafts will expand the donor pool for a patient in urgent need for a liver transplantation (LT). Here we report our results with emergency ABOi DD (deceased donor) LT using rituximab and antigen specific immunoadsorption. PATIENTS AND METHODS 2009 to 2019 we performed 20 ABOi DD LTs (adults n = 17, children n = 3) for patients in urgent need for a LT. Immunosuppression consisted of rituximab (n = 20) and basiliximab (n = 15) or anti-thymocyte globuline (n = 4), intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG; n = 6), tacrolimus, prednisolone and mycophenolate mofetil. Fifteen patients were treated with IA (n = 14) or both IA and plasmapheresis (PP; n = 1) pre-transplant and 18 patients were treated with IA (n = 15) or both IA and PP (n = 3) post-transplant. The median pre-transplant MELD- score was 40 (range 18-40). Patient and graft survival and complications were compared to a 1:4 case matched control group of ABO-identical or compatible (ABOid/c) DDLT. RESULTS The 1-, 3- and 5-year patient and graft survival rates were 85, 85 and 78% for the ABOi recipients and not significantly different compared to ABOid/c controls. Only one ABOi patient developed antibody-mediated rejection. CONCLUSION Patient and graft survival after emergency ABOi DDLT using rituximab and immunoadorption was equal to ABOid/DDLT. ABOi DD LT was a successful approach to expand the donor pool for patients in urgent need for a liver graft.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gustaf Herlenius
- Transplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Bengt Gustafsson
- Transplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Johan Mölne
- Department of Pathology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Institute of Biomedicine, Laboratory Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Sweden
| | - Lennart Rydberg
- Department of Clinical Chemistry and Transfusion Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Andreas Socratous
- Department of Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - William Bennet
- Transplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Broering D, Sturdevant ML, Zidan A. Robotic donor hepatectomy: A major breakthrough in living donor liver transplantation. Am J Transplant 2022; 22:14-23. [PMID: 34783439 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2021] [Revised: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Living donation in many countries is the main resource of organs. Healthy, volunteering individuals deserve the highest safety standards possible in addition to the least invasive technique to procure the organs. Since the introduction of living donor liver transplantation, many efforts have been made to minimize the surgical trauma inherent to living donor surgery. The journey started with a large Mercedes incision and evolved to reverse L-shaped and small upper midline incisions before the introduction of minimally invasive laparoscopic techniques originated. The technical difficulties of the laparoscopic approach due to suboptimal instrumentation, challenging ergonomics, and the long learning curve limited the application of the fully laparoscopic approach to a few centers. The recent introduction of the robotic platform with its superb optical system and advanced instruments allows for the first time, a genuine emulation of open donor surgery in a closed abdomen, thus allowing all liver donors to benefit from minimally invasive surgery (better cosmesis, less pain and morbidity, and better quality of life) without compromising donor safety. This attribute in combination with the ubiquitous presence of the robot in major transplant centers may well lead to the desired endpoint of this technology, namely, the widespread dissemination of minimally invasive donor surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dieter Broering
- Organ Transplant Center of Excellence - King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mark L Sturdevant
- Organ Transplant Center of Excellence - King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.,Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant - University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Ahmed Zidan
- Organ Transplant Center of Excellence - King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
BAYAM G, PAMUK G, AKSOY H, ZEYTUNLU M, ÖNGEL K. CANLI KARACİĞER DONÖRLERİNDE YAŞAM KALİTESİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. KAHRAMANMARAŞ SÜTÇÜ İMAM ÜNIVERSITESI TIP FAKÜLTESI DERGISI 2021. [DOI: 10.17517/ksutfd.983125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: In this study, it was aimed to examine the effect of transplantation on physical, mental and psychosocial health of donors by evaluating the quality of life of living liver donors after transplantation.
Methods: The study was conducted with three groups at XXXX University Faculty of Medicine Organ Transplantation and Research Center. 43 living donors from 2017 and 43 living donors from 2007-2016 who underwent liver transplantation were randomly selected to participate in the study. Also 43 control subjects were selected randomly from the community. The study was conducted by a single interviewer between 01.02.2018 and 31.05.2018 by telephone or e-mail. The socio-demographic data questionnaire, Short Form-36 (SF-36) and Hospital Anxiety-Depression Scale (HADS) prepared by the researchers were applied to all participants.
Results: The mean age of the participants was 38.04 ± 9.84 years, and of these participants 48.1% (n= 62) of them were female. When donors and control group were evaluated in terms of their quality of life, no significant difference was found between physical role, energy(vitality) and mental health subgroups(p> 0.05). However, donors have a better quality of life in physical functioning, emotional aspect, social functioning, pain and general health subgroups. It was detected that the quality of life was not affected by age, gender, marital status, educational status, economic status, job loss, comorbidity or disturbance by presence of operational scar. Only sexual problems and the loss of the recipient’s life were observed to have a negative impact on the quality of life. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of anxiety and depression (p
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gizem BAYAM
- IZMIR KATIP CELEBI UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL OF MEDICINE, DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY MEDICINE
| | - Gülseren PAMUK
- IZMIR KATIP CELEBI UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL OF MEDICINE, DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY MEDICINE
| | - Hilal AKSOY
- Hacettepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine
| | - Murat ZEYTUNLU
- EGE UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL OF MEDICINE, DEPARTMENT OF SURGICAL MEDICAL SCIENCES, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SURGERY
| | - Kurtuluş ÖNGEL
- IZMIR KATIP CELEBI UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL OF MEDICINE, DEPARTMENT OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY MEDICINE
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Jalil S, Black SM, Washburn K, Rangwani N, Hinton A, Kelly SG, Conteh L, Hanje J, Michaels A, Mumtaz K. Trends and Health Care Outcomes Among Living Liver Donors: Are We Ready to Expand the Donor Pool With Living Liver Donations? Liver Transpl 2021; 27:1603-1612. [PMID: 34213813 DOI: 10.1002/lt.26223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
We studied the trends and various outcomes, including the readmission rates, health care utilization, and complications among living liver donors (LLDs) in the United States. We queried the National Database for data from 2010 to 2017 for all LLDs. The primary outcomes were 30-day and 90-day readmission rates. The secondary outcomes included health care use (length of stay [LOS], cost of care), index admission, and calendar-year mortality. Logistic regression models were fit for various outcomes. A total of 1316 LLDs underwent hepatectomy during the study period. The median donor age was 35.0 years (interquartile range, 27.4-43.6), and donors were predominantly women (54.2%). The trend of LLD surgeries remained stable at large medical centers (85.3%). The 30-day and 90-day readmission rates were low at 5% and 5.9%, respectively. Older age (50 years and older; 8%; confidence interval [CI], 0.6%-15.9%; P = 0.03) and hepatectomy at small to medium-sized hospitals were associated with increased index LOS (13.4%; 95% CI, 3.1%-24.7%; P = 0.01). Moreover, older age of donor (-11.3%; 95% CI, -20.3% to -1.4%; P = 0.03), Elixhauser score ≥3 (17%; 95% CI, 1.2%-35.3%; P = 0.03), and Medicaid insurance (24.5%; 95% CI, 1.2%-53.1%; P = 0.04) were also associated with increased cost. The overall rate of any complications during index admission was 42.8%. Male sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.63; 95% CI, 1.19-2.23) was an independent predictor of post-LLD complications. There was no index admission or calendar-year mortality reported during the study period. This is the largest national report of LLDs to date, showing that the trend of LLD surgeries is stable in the United States. With established safety, fewer complications, and less health care utilization, LLDs can be a potential source of continuation of liver transplantation in the context of changing liver allocation policies in the United States.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sajid Jalil
- Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.,Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Sylvester M Black
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Ken Washburn
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Neil Rangwani
- Division of Hospital Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Alice Hinton
- Center for Biostatistics, Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Sean G Kelly
- Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.,Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Lanla Conteh
- Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.,Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - James Hanje
- Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.,Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Anthony Michaels
- Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.,Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Khalid Mumtaz
- Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.,Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Dos Santos JPF, Martins R, Lopes MF. Donor Surgical Morbidity in Pediatric Living-Donor Liver Transplant: A Portuguese Experience. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr 2021; 24:528-534. [PMID: 34796097 PMCID: PMC8593358 DOI: 10.5223/pghn.2021.24.6.528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Revised: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Living-donor liver transplant emerged as an alternative treatment for end stage liver disease due to the lack of cadaveric organs availability that met the demand. In Portugal, pediatric living-donor liver transplant (P-LDLT) was initiated in 2001 in Portugal in order to compensate for the scarcity of cadaveric organs for such cases. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze the morbi-mortality of the 28 donors included in P-LDLT program performed at Coimbra's Pediatric Hospital (CHUC), a Portuguese reference center. METHODS We retrospectively collected pertinent donor data and stratified complications according to Clavien's scoring system. RESULTS In total, 28.6% (n=8) of the donors had surgical complications. According to Clavien-Dindo's classification, two donors had major complications (Clavien grade ≥3), four donors had grade 2 complications, and two donors had grade 1 complications. There were no P-LDLT-related mortalities in the present case series. The most common verified complications were biliary tract injuries and superficial incisional infections, which are consistent with the complications reported in worldwide series. CONCLUSION These patients from CHUC shows that donor hepatectomy in P-LDLT is a safe procedure, with low morbidity and without mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ricardo Martins
- University of Coimbra, Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra, Portugal.,Surgery Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitario de Coimbra EPE (CHUC), Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Maria Francelina Lopes
- University of Coimbra, Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra, Portugal.,Pediatric Surgery Departement, Centro Hospitalar e Universitario de Coimbra EPE (CHUC), Coimbra, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Yilmaz S, Akbulut S, Usta S, Ozsay O, Sahin TT, Sarici KB, Karabulut E, Baskiran A, Gonultas F, Ozdemir F, Ersan V, Isik B, Kutlu R, Dirican A, Harputluoglu M. Diagnostic and therapeutic management algorithm for biliary complications in living liver donors. Transpl Int 2021; 34:2226-2237. [PMID: 34510566 DOI: 10.1111/tri.14104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Revised: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed to demonstrate the efficacy of our diagnostic and therapeutic management algorithm and catheter-assisted (percutaneous transhepatic biliary tract drainage [PTBD] or transanastomotic feeding tube) hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) procedures in living liver donors (LLDs) with biliary complications. Living donor hepatectomy (LDH) was performed between September 2005 and April 2021 in 2 489 LLDs. Biliary complications developed in 220 LLDs (8.8%), 136 of which were male, and the median age was 29 (interquartile range [IQR]: 12) years. Endoscopic sphincterotomy ± stenting was performed in 132 LLDs, which was unsuccessful in 9 LLDs and required HJ. Overall, 142 LLDs underwent interventional radiologic procedures. Fifteen LLDs with biliary complications underwent HJ (PTBD catheter = 6 and transanastomotic feeding tube = 9) at a median of 44 days (IQR: 82). Following HJ, 14 LLDs did not have any complications throughout the median follow-up period of 1619 days (IQR: 1454). However, percutaneous dilation for HJ anastomotic stricture was performed in one patient. Biliary complications are very common following LDH; therefore, surgeons in the field should have a low threshold to perform HJ for biliary complications that persist after other treatments. Our catheter-assisted HJ techniques demonstrated a high success rate and aided HJ in a hostile abdomen during revisional surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sezai Yilmaz
- Liver Transplant Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey
| | - Sami Akbulut
- Liver Transplant Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey
| | - Sertac Usta
- Liver Transplant Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey
| | - Oguzhan Ozsay
- Liver Transplant Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey
| | - Tevfik Tolga Sahin
- Liver Transplant Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey
| | - Kemal Baris Sarici
- Liver Transplant Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey
| | - Ertugrul Karabulut
- Liver Transplant Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey
| | - Adil Baskiran
- Liver Transplant Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey
| | - Fatih Gonultas
- Liver Transplant Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey
| | - Fatih Ozdemir
- Liver Transplant Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey
| | - Veysel Ersan
- Liver Transplant Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey
| | - Burak Isik
- Liver Transplant Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey
| | - Ramazan Kutlu
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey
| | - Abuzer Dirican
- Liver Transplant Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey
| | - Murat Harputluoglu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|