1
|
Köhler TS, Munarriz R, Parker J, Bettocchi C, Hatzichristodoulou G, Martins FE, Moncada I, Osmonov D, Park SH, Ralph D, Wang R. Penile prosthesis for erectile dysfunction: recommendations from the 5th International Consultation on Sexual Medicine. Sex Med Rev 2025; 13:144-171. [PMID: 40072010 DOI: 10.1093/sxmrev/qeaf001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2024] [Revised: 12/09/2024] [Accepted: 01/21/2025] [Indexed: 04/16/2025]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Penile prosthesis (PP) is one of the main approved therapies for erectile dysfunction (ED). Greater than 50 years of clinical use has led to considerable innovation in PP surgery and patient care. OBJECTIVES To summarize the current literature and provide updated clinical evidence to inform healthcare providers on best practices with PP. METHODS A consensus panel was held with leading sexual medicine experts during the 5th International Consultation on Sexual Medicine (ICSM). Relevant peer-reviewed literature was reviewed with focus on research from but not limited to the last 10 years. The quality of each individual study was judged with Oxford levels of evidence (LOE) criteria, but overall LOE were not used as systematic review was not performed. The expert panel generated consensus statements based on the quality of evidence and criteria of GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). RESULTS PP provides excellent outcomes for the treatment of ED. The panel developed 35 recommendations building upon previous recommendations. Nine recommendations (4, 5, 11,13,17, 25, 26, 31, and 32) are retained without change from 2015. Twelve recommendations (1, 2, 3, 7, 9,14,16,19,21, 28, 33, and 34) change syntax to make statements more active or change details. Fourteen recommendations (6, 8, 10, 12, 15, 18, 20, 22, 23, 24, 27, 29, 30, and 35) are novel in this update. CONCLUSION Since the 4th ICSM, new evidence has emerged to guide PP use in modern sexual medicine. While multi-institutional studies are needed to improve outcomes, key challenges remain: reducing infections, enhancing devices, and improving awareness and accessibility. We recommend following 5th ICSM guidelines while emphasizing the importance of clinical judgment and shared decision-making for optimal PP outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias S Köhler
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, United States
| | - Ricardo Munarriz
- Department of Urology, Boston University School of Medicine Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 02118, United States
| | - Justin Parker
- Department of Urology, Bay Pines VA Health System and University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, 33606, United States
| | - Carlo Bettocchi
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Foggia, Foggia, 71121, Italy
| | | | - Francisco E Martins
- Department of Urology, University of Lisbon, School of Medicine, Santa Maria Hospital, 1600-161 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Ignacio Moncada
- Department of Urology, Hospital La Zarzuela, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, 28023, Spain
| | - Daniar Osmonov
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Schleswig Holstein, 24105 Kiel, Germany
| | - Sung Hun Park
- Sewum Prosthetic Urology Center of Excellence for Penile Implants, Seoul, 06612, Korea
- School of Medicine, Ajou University, Suwon, 06612, South Korea
| | - David Ralph
- University College London Hospitals & St Peter's Andrology, London, NW1 2BU, United Kingdom
| | - Run Wang
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and McGovern Medical School at Houston, Houston, 77030, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Helo S, Bonakdar Hashemi M, Ziegelmann MJ, Lybbert DT, Piraino J, Guillen Lozoya AH, Köhler TS. Chlorhexidine gluconate application, diabetes, revision surgery, and extended operative time increase risk for penile implant infection. J Sex Med 2025; 22:508-516. [PMID: 39916374 DOI: 10.1093/jsxmed/qdaf009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2024] [Revised: 11/20/2024] [Accepted: 01/20/2025] [Indexed: 04/12/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) (0.05%) has recently been suggested as a dip and irrigation solution at time of inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) surgery. AIM This study evaluated infection rates before and after implementing CHG protocol while investigating concurrent risk factors contributing to post operative infections. METHODS A retrospective, consecutive cohort study was performed that included patients who underwent insertion of a Coloplast Titan IPP including both virgin and revision cases between 2021 and 2024. Cases performed from January 2021 to August 2022 utilized rifampin/gentamicin for dip and vancomycin/gentamicin for irrigation (ABX), whereas those from October 2022 to May 2024 utilized CHG for both dip and irrigation. Perioperative risk factors including dip and irrigation solution used at time of surgery were compared between groups. OUTCOMES We defined the incidence of postoperative infection and risk factors associated with infection in each group. RESULTS The incidence of infection was significantly higher in the 0.05% CHG group (13/377) compared to the ABX group (0/320) (P < .001). When analyzed separately by subgroup, virgin cases treated with CHG for dip and irrigation demonstrated a significantly higher infection rate (7/315) compared to those in the ABX group (0/280) (P = .012). Similarly, in revision cases, the CHG group also exhibited a significantly higher infection rate (0/40) than the ABX group (6/62) (P = .043).Univariable analysis of the CHG cohort identified three significant risk factors for infection: diabetes mellitus (DM), extended operative time (OP), and revision surgery (P = .003, .001, and < .001, respectively). Multivariable regression analysis revealed that patients with DM had a 5.7-fold increased risk of infection (OR: 5.70, P = .004), while those undergoing revision surgery faced a 5.3-fold higher risk (OR: 5.26, P = .004). Additionally, each minute increase in OP was associated with a 1% higher infection risk (OR: 1.01 per minute, P = .007). These associations remained significant after adjusting for all variables in the model. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Prosthetic surgeons should be cautious about adopting 0.05% CHG for both dip and irrigation in the absence of strong clinical evidence demonstrating its non-inferiority to antibiotic solutions. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS This is the first clinical study reporting infection rates after IPP surgery using 0.05% CHG for both dip and irrigation. While retrospective and non-randomized, we present a relatively large sample size of patients. CONCLUSIONS Our findings identify four risk factors for penile prosthesis infection: usage of the 0.05% CHG solution for dip and irrigation solution of Coloplast hydrophilic-coated devices, DM, revision surgery, and extended OP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sevann Helo
- Mayo Clinic Department of Urology, Rochester, MN 55905, United States
| | | | | | - Daniel T Lybbert
- Mayo Clinic Department of Urology, Rochester, MN 55905, United States
| | - Javier Piraino
- Mayo Clinic Department of Urology, Rochester, MN 55905, United States
| | | | - Tobias S Köhler
- Mayo Clinic Department of Urology, Rochester, MN 55905, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hammad MAM, Barham DW, Simhan J, Nguyen T, Swerdloff D, Miller J, Hatzichristodoulou G, Sempels M, Andrianne R, Hotaling JM, Hsieh TC, Jones JM, Modgil V, Osmonov D, Pearce I, Perito P, Sadeghi-Nejad H, Suarez-Sarmiento A, Yafi FA, Gross MS. A multicenter evaluation of penile curvature correction in men with Peyronie's disease undergoing inflatable penile prosthesis placement. J Sex Med 2025; 22:349-355. [PMID: 39724925 DOI: 10.1093/jsxmed/qdae192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2024] [Revised: 11/24/2024] [Accepted: 12/11/2024] [Indexed: 12/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) insertion is recommended for the treatment of patients with Peyronie's disease (PD) and significant erectile dysfunction (ED); adjunctive procedures can be used for residual curvature after IPP placement. AIM To assess the management of penile curvature correction in PD patients undergoing IPP procedures within a large multinational, multicenter cohort. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted on PD patients treated with IPP by 11 experienced prosthetic surgeons. Demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative data were analyzed to assess the improvement in penile curvature following IPP, including adjunctive correction techniques such as manual modeling, tunica albuginea plication, and grafting. OUTCOMES Curvature correction achieved after IPP placement and adjunctive procedures. RESULTS For 499 PD patients treated with IPP, median age was 62.0 [30.0, 91.0] years with mean follow-up of 16.5 (SD = 12.9) months. The mean preoperative curvature was 39.4° (SD = 17.8°), with dorsal curvature being most common. Among our cohort, 17.6% had IPP-only placement, while the majority of 82.4% patients underwent IPP along with adjunctive correction procedures. Specifically, manual modeling (with/without the "scratch" technique) was used in 74.7% of cases, tunica albuginea plication in 4.8%, grafting in 2%, and combined grafting and modeling in 0.8%. Patients who underwent grafting generally had fewer preoperative comorbidities and more severe preoperative curvatures of 60.0° [45.0°, 70.0°]. Grafting also provided the highest median curvature correction of 55.0° [48.8°, 73.8°], (P < .001). Plication achieved a median curvature correction of 40.0° [28.8°, 41.2°], whereas modeling resulted in a median curvature reduction of 26.0° [20.0°, 39.5°], (P < .001). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS We observed that grafting, though less frequently used, provided more curvature correction in severe PD cases undergoing IPP. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS Large cohort size and multinational participation are strengths, though retrospective design and general variability in surgical techniques are limitations. CONCLUSION Adjunctive techniques, including grafting, plication, and modeling provide options for tailoring curvature correction to disease severity and patient characteristics. Future prospective studies are needed to standardize and evaluate the comparative outcomes of these techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammed A M Hammad
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA 92868, United States
| | - David W Barham
- Department of Surgery, Urology Section, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, TX 78234, United States
| | - Jay Simhan
- Department of Urology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, United States
| | - Tuan Nguyen
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA 92868, United States
- Department of Urology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City, 700000, Vietnam
| | - Daniel Swerdloff
- Department of Urology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, United States
| | - Jake Miller
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA 92868, United States
| | | | - Maxime Sempels
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Liège, Liege, 4000, Belgium
| | - Robert Andrianne
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Liège, Liege, 4000, Belgium
| | - James M Hotaling
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, United States
| | - Tung-Chin Hsieh
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States
| | - James M Jones
- Department of Urology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA 02118, United States
| | - Vaibhav Modgil
- Manchester Andrology Centre, Manchester University, Manchester, M13 9WL, United Kingdom
| | - Daniar Osmonov
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Kiel, 24105, Germany
| | - Ian Pearce
- Manchester Andrology Centre, Manchester University, Manchester, M13 9WL, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Perito
- Perito Urology, Coral Gables, FL 33134, United States
| | | | | | - Faysal A Yafi
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA 92868, United States
| | - Martin S Gross
- Department of Urology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH 03756, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hawks-Ladds N, Babar M, Labagnara K, Loloi J, Patel RD, Aalami Harandi A, Zhu M, Salami A, Maria P. Risk factors for reoperation of inflatable penile prosthesis among an ethnically diverse urban population in a high-volume center. Int J Impot Res 2025; 37:37-44. [PMID: 39187572 PMCID: PMC11706775 DOI: 10.1038/s41443-024-00966-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2024] [Revised: 08/06/2024] [Accepted: 08/13/2024] [Indexed: 08/28/2024]
Abstract
Inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) is a surgical treatment for erectile dysfunction refractory to medical therapy or for those who desire permanent treatment. Complications like mechanical failure and infection may necessitate reoperation, and patients with certain risk factors remain predisposed to reoperation. We retrospectively analyzed 530 patients undergoing primary IPP implantation at a large, urban, multiethnic hospital with a high volume of IPP implantations. Primary outcomes were reoperation due to any reason and reoperation due to infection. Patient characteristics and intraoperative factors were compared between those requiring reoperation and those not requiring reoperation. Overall, 12.1% of patients underwent reoperation, primarily due to infection, with a median time to reoperation of 4 months. Analysis revealed an increased likelihood of reoperation with Peyronie's disease (OR = 2.47), hemoglobin A1c over 8 (OR = 2.25), active smoking (OR = 2.75), and estimated blood loss (EBL) ≥ 25cc (OR = 2.45). A decreased likelihood of reoperation was observed when Arista™ powder was used intraoperatively (OR = 0.38). Reoperation specifically due to infection was associated with an infrapubic approach (OR = 2.56) and hypertension (OR = 9.12). Our findings confirm smoking and diabetes as risk factors for reoperation, while also providing insights into factors like estimated blood loss and Arista™ powder use. However, long-term survival rates were limited by loss to follow-up. (Clinical trial registration N/A).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Kevin Labagnara
- Department of Internal Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Long Island, NY, USA
| | - Justin Loloi
- Department of Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Rutul D Patel
- Department of Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| | | | - Michael Zhu
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | | | - Pedro Maria
- Department of Urology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Preto M, Falcone M, Plamadeala N, Schifano N, Bettocchi C, Colombo F, Fiordelise S, Vitarelli A, Silvani M, Mondaini N, Paradiso M, Ceruti C, Varvello F, Palumbo F, Avolio A, Antonini G, Corvasce A, Pozza D, Franco G, Bitelli M, Boezio F, Conti E, Caraceni E, Negro C, Carrino M, Vicini P, Ghidini N, Alei G, Italiano E, Timpano M, Polito M, Natali A, Tamai A, Pescatori E, Dehò F, Gideon B, Gontero P, Palmieri A, Capogrosso P. Risk of unfavorable outcomes after penile prosthesis implantation - results from a national registry (INSIST-ED). Int J Impot Res 2024; 36:842-847. [PMID: 37907669 DOI: 10.1038/s41443-023-00784-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 09/30/2023] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023]
Abstract
Like all surgeries, penile prosthesis implantation (PPI) has the potential for both postoperative complications and suboptimal patient satisfaction. In order to assess risk factors for poor satisfaction, we reviewed patients who had been prospectively recruited in a national multi-institutional registry of penile prostheses procedures (INSIST-ED) from 2014 to 20121. Patient baseline characteristics and postoperative complications were recorded. The primary endpoint of this study was unfavorable outcomes after inflatable PPI, defined as significant postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥2) and/or Sexuality with Quality of Life and Sexuality with Penile Prosthesis (QoLSPP) scores below the 10th percentile. A total of 256 patients were included in the study. The median age was 60 years (IQR 56-67). The most common cause of erectile dysfunction (ED) was organic (42.2%), followed by pelvic surgery/radiotherapy (39.8%) and Peyronie's disease (18.0%). Postoperative complications were recorded in 9.6%. High-grade complications (Clavien ≥2) occurred in 4.7%. At 1-year follow-up, the median QoLSPP total score was 71 (IQR 65-76). In all, 14.8% of patients were classified as having experienced unfavorable outcomes because of significant postoperative complications and/or QoLSPP scores below the 10th percentile. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated patient age to be non-linearly associated with the risk of experiencing unfavorable outcomes. A U-shaped correlation showed a lower risk for younger and older patients and a higher risk for middle-aged men. ED etiology and surgical volume were not associated with PPI outcomes. Physicians should, therefore, be aware that middle-aged men may be at higher risk of being unsatisfied following PPI compared to both younger and older patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirko Preto
- Department of Urology, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza - Turin, Umbria, Italy.
| | - Marco Falcone
- Department of Urology, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza - Turin, Umbria, Italy
| | - Natalia Plamadeala
- Department of Urology, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza - Turin, Umbria, Italy
| | - Nicolò Schifano
- Unit of Urology, ASST Sette Laghi, Circolo e Fondazione Macchi Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | | | - Fulvio Colombo
- Sant'Orsola University Hospital, Andrology Unit, University of Bologna, Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
| | | | | | - Mauro Silvani
- Department of Urology, Ospedale di Biella, Biella, Italy
| | - Nicola Mondaini
- Department of Urology, Villa Donatello Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Matteo Paradiso
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Cardinal Massaia, Asti, Italy
| | - Carlo Ceruti
- Department of Urology, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza - Turin, Umbria, Italy
| | | | | | - Antonio Avolio
- Studio di Urologia e Andrologia - Centro Medico Iside, Ascoli Piceno, Italy
| | | | | | - Diego Pozza
- Studio di Andrologia e di Chirurgia Andrologica, Rome, Italy
| | - Giorgio Franco
- Department of Urology, 'La Sapienza' University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Bitelli
- Department of Urology, Frascati Hospital H1, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Enrico Conti
- Department of Urology, Levante Ligure Hospital, Italy, La Spezia, Italy
| | - Enrico Caraceni
- Department of Urology, Area Vasta 3 Asur Marche, Civitanova Marche, Italy
| | - Carlo Negro
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Evangelico Internazionale Genova, Genova, Italy
| | | | - Patrizio Vicini
- Department of Urology, Italian Neurotraumatologic Institute Grottaferrata 'I.N.I.', Grottaferrata, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Giovanni Alei
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Emilio Italiano
- Operative Unit of Urology, Hospital 'Villa Sofia-Cervello', Piazzetta Salerno, Palermo, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Timpano
- Department of Urology, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza - Turin, Umbria, Italy
| | - Massimo Polito
- Department of Clinical and Specialist Sciences, Division of Urology, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region Medical School, Ancona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Natali
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Aldo Tamai
- Department of Urology, Data Clinica, Vicenza, Italy
| | | | - Federico Dehò
- Unit of Urology, ASST Sette Laghi, Circolo e Fondazione Macchi Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Blecher Gideon
- Department of Urology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Monash Health, Bentleigh East, VIC, Australia
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Department of Urology, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza - Turin, Umbria, Italy
| | - Alessandro Palmieri
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences, Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Paolo Capogrosso
- Unit of Urology, ASST Sette Laghi, Circolo e Fondazione Macchi Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cheema AS, Patel MK, El-Arabi AM, Gonzalez CM. Management of Infections Associated with Penile Prostheses and Artificial Urinary Sphincters. Urol Clin North Am 2024; 51:505-515. [PMID: 39349018 DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2024.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/02/2024]
Abstract
Prosthetic urology can substantially enhance the quality of life for patients. However, it is not without challenges. Infections of penile prostheses and artificial urinary sphincters are often difficult to diagnose, manage, and treat. Over time, device improvements, refined surgical methods, better understanding of microbiology, and biofilms in combination with higher sterility standards and protocols, have significantly reduced the rates of infection. Here, the authors offer a comprehensive overview of prosthetic urologic infections and their management in the current era.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amandip S Cheema
- Department of Urology, Loyola University Medical Center, 2160 South 1st Avenue, Maywood, IL 60153, USA.
| | - Milan K Patel
- Department of Urology, Loyola University Medical Center, 2160 South 1st Avenue, Maywood, IL 60153, USA
| | - Ahmad M El-Arabi
- Department of Urology, Loyola University Medical Center, 2160 South 1st Avenue, Maywood, IL 60153, USA
| | - Christopher M Gonzalez
- Department of Urology, Loyola University Medical Center, 2160 South 1st Avenue, Maywood, IL 60153, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Xia LC, Zhang K, Wang CW. Effects of fluid therapy combined with a preoperative glucose load regimen on postoperative recovery in patients with rectal cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16:2662-2670. [PMID: 39220080 PMCID: PMC11362918 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i8.2662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2024] [Revised: 06/08/2024] [Accepted: 07/01/2024] [Indexed: 08/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with rectal cancer undergoing radical resection often have poor postoperative recovery due to preoperative fasting and water deprivation and the removal of diseased tissue, and have a high risk of complications. Therefore, it is of great significance to apply appropriate rehydration regimens to patients undergoing radical resection of rectal cancer during the perioperative period to improve the postoperative outcomes of patients. AIM To analyze the effects of goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) with a preoperative glucose load regimen on postoperative recovery and complications in patients undergoing radical resection for rectal cancer. METHODS Patients with rectal cancer who underwent radical resection (n = 184) between January 2021 and December 2023 at our hospital were randomly divided into either a control group or an observation group (n = 92 in each group). Both groups received a preoperative glucose load regimen, and routine fluid replacement and GDFT were additionally implements in the control and observation groups, respectively. The operative conditions, blood levels of lactic acid and inflammatory markers, postoperative recovery, cognitive status, hemodynamic indicators, brain oxygen metabolism, and complication rates were compared between the groups. RESULTS The colloidal fluid dosage, total infusion, and urine volume, as well as time to first exhaust, time to food intake, and postoperative length of hospital stay, were lower in the observation group (P < 0.05). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of operation time, bleeding volume, crystalloid liquid consumption, time to tracheal extubation, complication rate, heart rate, or mean arterial pressure (P > 0.05). Compared with the control group, in the observation group the lactic acid level was lower immediately after the surgery (P < 0.05); the Mini-Mental State Examination score was higher on postoperative day 3 (P < 0.05); the pulse pressure variability (PPV) was lower at 30 min after pneumoperitoneum (P < 0.05), though the differences in the PPV of the two groups was not significant at the remaining time points (P > 0.05); tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-6 levels were lower on postoperative day 3 (P < 0.05); and the left and right regional cerebral oxygen saturation was higher immediately after the surgery and 30 min after pneumoperitoneum (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION GDFT combined with the preoperative glucose load regimen is a safe and effective treatment strategy for improving postoperative recovery and risk of complications in patients with rectal cancer undergoing radical resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lv-Chi Xia
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Jiujiang First People's Hospital, Jiujiang 332000, Jiangxi Province, China
| | - Ke Zhang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Jiujiang First People's Hospital, Jiujiang 332000, Jiangxi Province, China
| | - Chuan-Wen Wang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Jiujiang First People's Hospital, Jiujiang 332000, Jiangxi Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Moukhtar Hammad MA, Barham DW, Sanford DI, Amini E, Jenkins L, Yafi FA. Maximizing outcomes in penile prosthetic surgery: exploring strategies to prevent and manage infectious and non-infectious complications. Int J Impot Res 2023; 35:613-619. [PMID: 37828138 PMCID: PMC10622320 DOI: 10.1038/s41443-023-00773-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Revised: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023]
Abstract
Inflatable Penile Prostheses (IPP) implantation is a surgical treatment for patients desiring definitive treatment for erectile dysfunction. While this procedure has proven to be effective, it also carries its own set of unique risks that need to be carefully considered. The article reviews the current understanding of complications associated with penile prosthetic surgery and provides strategies to mitigate these adverse events. This article covers various aspects of IPP implantation, including the risks of infection, bleeding, injury to nearby structures, glans ischemia, and device malfunction. It also discusses the importance of careful preoperative screening to identify risk factors and the implementation of infection reduction strategies such as antimicrobial prophylaxis, skin prep, and operative techniques. In addition, it emphasizes the need for postoperative vigilance and prompt management of any complications that may arise. Overall, the article provides a comprehensive overview of the risks and strategies for mitigating complications associated with IPP implantation. Our recommendations are given based on the current consensus in the field and highlight the importance of careful planning, attention to detail, and effective communication between healthcare providers and patients. Despite the potential risks, this review underscores the fact that complications following penile prosthesis implantation are relatively rare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David W Barham
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA, USA
| | - Daniel I Sanford
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Artificial Intelligence Center at USC Urology, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Lawrence Jenkins
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA, USA
| | - Faysal A Yafi
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Munoz-Lopez C, Lewis K, Dewitt-Foy M, Lone Z, Montague DK, Angermeier KW, Gill BC. Outcomes of Inflatable Penile Prosthesis following Radical Cystectomy - A matched Cohort Analysis. Urology 2023:S0090-4295(23)00144-9. [PMID: 36796542 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.01.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Revised: 01/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate outcomes of inflatable-penile-prosthesis (IPP) implantation after radical-cystectomy compared with other etiologies of erectile dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS All inflatable penile prostheses within the past 20 years in a large regional health system were reviewed, and erectile dysfunction etiology was determined as radical-cystectomy, radical-prostatectomy, or organic/other ED. Cohorts were generated by 1:3 propensity score match using age, body mass index, and diabetes status. Baseline demographics and relevant comorbidities were evaluated. Clavien-Dindo complications, grade, and reoperation were assessed. Multivariable logarithmic regression was used to identify the predictors of 90-day complications following IPP implantation. Log-rank analysis was used to assess the time-to-reoperation after IPP implantation in patients with a history of cystectomy compared with non-cystectomy etiologies. RESULTS Of 2600 patients, 231 subjects were included in the study. Comparing patients undergoing IPP for cystectomy vs. pooled non-cystectomy indications, those who underwent radical-cystectomy had a higher overall complication rate(24% vs. 9%, p=0.02). Clavien-Dindo complication grades did not differ across groups. Reoperation was significantly more common following cystectomy (cystectomy: 21% vs. non-cystectomy: 7%, p=0.01), however time to reoperation did not differ significantly by indication (cystectomy: 8 years vs non-cystectomy: 10 years, p=0.09). Among cystectomy patients, 85% of reoperations were due to mechanical failure. CONCLUSION Compared to other erectile dysfunction etiologies, patients undergoing IPP with a history of cystectomy have an increased risk of complications within 90-days of implantation and need for surgical device revision, but no greater risk for high-grade complications. Overall IPP remains a valid treatment option after cystectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Munoz-Lopez
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| | - Kevin Lewis
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Molly Dewitt-Foy
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Zaeem Lone
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| | - Drogo K Montague
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | | | - Bradley C Gill
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chung E, Bettocchi C, Egydio P, Love C, Osmonov D, Park S, Ralph D, Xin ZC, Brock G. The International Penile Prosthesis Implant Consensus Forum: clinical recommendations and surgical principles on the inflatable 3-piece penile prosthesis implant. Nat Rev Urol 2022; 19:534-546. [PMID: 35711059 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-022-00607-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Despite significant scientific advances in the modern three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis implant surgery, it is not without surgical risks and can carry additional cosmetic and psychosocial consequences in poorly selected and consented individuals. To address this problem, an international group of key opinion leaders and high-volume prosthetic surgeons reviewed the current guidelines and clinical evidence, discussed their experiences, and formed a consensus regarding inflatable penile prosthesis surgery. The findings of this consensus panel were presented at the 17th biennial Asia Pacific Society of Sexual Medicine scientific meeting. The experts concluded that proper patient selection, informed consent and strict adherence to safe surgical principles are important to optimize clinical outcomes. Furthermore, most intraoperative complications, if recognized, can be addressed intraoperatively to enable placement of the device at the time of initial surgery. Men with significant corporal fibrosis due to Peyronie's disease, prior prosthesis explantation and priapism, and men who have undergone construction of a neophallus, as well as men who receive concurrent continence surgery, are complex cases requiring additional care and advanced techniques to obtain optimal surgical outcomes. Variability in patient care - in terms of postoperative antibiotic use, pain management, scrotal care, and cycling of the penile prosthesis implant - must be reduced to enable optimization and assessment of outcomes across patient groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Chung
- AndroUrology Centre, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
- University of Queensland, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
- AndroUrology Centre and Macquarie University Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
- AndroUrology Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
| | | | | | - Chris Love
- Urology South, Level 2, Holmesglen Private Hospital, Moorabbin, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Sean Park
- Sewum Prosthetic Urology Center of Excellence, Seoul, Korea
| | - David Ralph
- Institute of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Zhong Cheng Xin
- Andrology Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Gerald Brock
- University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fernandez-Crespo RE, Buscaino K, Carrion R. Optimizing Outcomes in Penile Implant Surgery. Urol Clin North Am 2021; 48:527-542. [PMID: 34602173 DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2021.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Since their initial release in the 1970s, modern penile prostheses have been subjected to continuous improvement with respect to both device engineering and surgical technique. Proper implantation begins with appropriate patient selection and counseling; these are essential elements to optimize results and set expectations postoperatively. An evidence-based protocol for the prevention of infections is essential. A pain management protocol should be initiated even before surgery. Strict adherence to recommended intraoperative techniques minimizes the risk complications; when complications occur, a step-by-step process for management improves odds of resolution. Safe techniques to increase the perceived or actual penile length postimplant can markedly improve patient satisfaction. Postoperatively, the surgeon and the patient should follow strict evidence-based instructions to optimize the overall outcomes of penile prosthesis surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raul E Fernandez-Crespo
- Sexual Medicine-Department of Urology, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, 12901 Bruce B Downs Boulevard, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
| | - Kristina Buscaino
- Sexual Medicine-Department of Urology, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, 12901 Bruce B Downs Boulevard, Tampa, FL 33612, USA. https://twitter.com/drxtinabuscaino
| | - Rafael Carrion
- Department of Urology, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, 12901 Bruce B Downs Boulevard, Tampa, FL 33612, USA. https://twitter.com/urol11
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
The Association Between Hemoglobin A1c Levels and Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Infection: Analysis of US Insurance Claims Data. J Sex Med 2021; 18:1104-1109. [PMID: 37057465 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.03.077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Revised: 03/13/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The association between elevated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels and the risk of postoperative infection after penile prosthesis surgery remains controversial. AIM To examine the association between HbA1c levels and penile implant infections in men undergoing inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) surgery for erectile dysfunction using a large insurance claims database. METHODS This was a retrospective review using Optum's de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart Database. Male subjects 18 years and older with available laboratory data undergoing IPP insertion between 2003 and 2018 were included. Administrative diagnosis and procedural codes were used to assess subsequent penile implant revision surgery status for either infectious or noninfectious causes. Associated conditions were controlled for such as smoking status, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, obesity status, and Peyronie's disease. OUTCOMES The main outcomes were risk of revision for infection and time to revision. RESULTS A total of 2,363 individuals underwent initial IPP insertion and had available HbA1c data with a mean HbA1c of 6.9%. The overall IPP infection revision rate was 3.9% and the highest rate of 12.1% was seen in the highest HbA1c group (>10%). After adjusting for demographic and health factors, a higher HbA1c level was associated with a higher risk of revision for infection, with every 1 point increase in HbA1c conferring an increased risk of infection requiring revision by 29% (95% CI 17-42%). When infections did occur, they happened sooner in men with HbA1c > 10.0% with an average of 1.3 months vs 3.5 months in the HbA1c < 6.0% group. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS These findings provide insight into the potential relationship between HbA1c levels and postoperative risk of infection after penile prosthesis surgery and may aid in clinical decision-making. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS Strengths include the large sample size, length of data coverage, and real-world analysis of surgeries done across the United States. Limitations include the reliance on insurance claims data, the retrospective study design, and lack of additional relevant clinical variables that may impact infection rates. CONCLUSIONS While the overall risk of penile prosthesis infection remains modest, the current report notes an increased risk of infection for diabetic men with poor glycemic control. Chen T, Li S, Eisenberg ML. The Association Between Hemoglobin A1c Levels and Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Infection: Analysis of US Insurance Claims Data. J Sex Med 2021;18:1104-1109.
Collapse
|
13
|
Talib R, Alnadhari I, Canguven O, Yassin A, Shamsodini A, Alrumaihi K, Al-Ansari A. HbA1c over 8.5% is not predictive of increased infection rate following penile prosthesis implant surgery in diabetic patients with erectile dysfunction. Andrologia 2021; 53:e14132. [PMID: 34062008 DOI: 10.1111/and.14132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2021] [Revised: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus is associated with increased risk of erectile dysfunction. Penile prosthesis implantation is an efficient therapeutic option for erectile dysfunction, but not without risk, as infection remains a prominent concern. This study investigates diabetes mellitus as a risk factor for penile prosthesis implantation infection and the relationship between haemoglobinA1c levels and infection rates. All diabetic patients with erectile dysfunction who underwent penile prosthesis implantation surgery between January 2012 and November 2019 at Hamad Medical Corporation, Qatar, were included in this retrospective observational study. A total of 599 diabetic patients with erectile dysfunction had penile prosthesis implantation. Mean age was 59.69 ± 31.19. Penile prosthesis implantation infection rate was 0.83% (5/599), while the mean haemoglobinA1c level was 7.58 ± 1.45 mmol/l (range: 4.1-12.6). A comparison between diabetic patients with penile prosthesis implantation infection and those without infection revealed no significant difference in the level of haemoglobinA1c between the two groups with mean haemoglobinA1c in patients with infected implants 7.14 and 7.59 for noninfected (p = 0.491). Limitations include retrospective single-centre design and low-infection rates reducing sample number. Penile prosthesis implantation infection rate in a large series of diabetic patients was low with no significant association between haemoglobinA1c level and penile prosthesis implantation infection observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raidh Talib
- Department of Urology, Andrology Unit, Hamad medical corporation, Doha, Qatar.,Weill Cornel Medical School (WCM-Q), Doha, Qatar
| | - Ibrahim Alnadhari
- Department of Urology, Andrology Unit, Hamad medical corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Onder Canguven
- Department of Urology, Andrology Unit, Hamad medical corporation, Doha, Qatar.,Weill Cornel Medical School (WCM-Q), Doha, Qatar
| | - Aksam Yassin
- Department of Urology, Andrology Unit, Hamad medical corporation, Doha, Qatar.,Weill Cornel Medical School (WCM-Q), Doha, Qatar.,Center of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dresden International University, Dresden, Germany
| | - Ahmad Shamsodini
- Department of Urology, Andrology Unit, Hamad medical corporation, Doha, Qatar.,Weill Cornel Medical School (WCM-Q), Doha, Qatar
| | - Khalid Alrumaihi
- Department of Urology, Andrology Unit, Hamad medical corporation, Doha, Qatar.,Weill Cornel Medical School (WCM-Q), Doha, Qatar.,Center of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dresden International University, Dresden, Germany
| | - Abdulla Al-Ansari
- Department of Urology, Andrology Unit, Hamad medical corporation, Doha, Qatar.,Weill Cornel Medical School (WCM-Q), Doha, Qatar
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
A Systematic Review of Literature Regarding Whether Immediate Preoperative Hemoglobin A1c or Serum Glucose Are Risk Factors for Infection Following Penile Prosthesis Implantation. Urology 2021; 152:15-24. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.01.066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Revised: 01/02/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
|
15
|
Haobus M, Almannie R, Aziz M, Farag M, Ralph D, Mulhall J, Binsaleh S. Correlation of fasting blood sugar at the time of penile prosthesis surgery with the level of glycated hemoglobin and the outcome of surgery. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY 2021; 27:90. [PMID: 36844698 PMCID: PMC9957561 DOI: 10.1186/s12301-021-00198-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The role of glycemic control in predicting implant infection and other surgical complications is debatable. This study aimed to assess the potential correlation between fasting blood sugar (FBS) levels prior to penile prosthesis surgery (PPS) and the surgical outcomes. Methods A retrospective study from data collected prospectively in 2015 in a single center. Patients who underwent penile implant procedures were included. Exclusion criteria were if surgery done by low-volume implanter, patients who required revision surgery or not diagnosed with diabetes mellitus. Management was standardized to all patients. Results All complications whether minor or major were documented up to three years. One year after the surgery a Likert scale questionnaire was completed by the patients. In total, 218 patients completed the study at last follow-up. Complications rate was 6.25%. The rate of infection requiring explantation was 3.8%. 0.9% of patients had a superficial infection managed successfully with conservative management. 0.9% had erosion and 0.9% had mechanical failure. There was no statistically significant difference in FBS or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels in patients with postoperative complications compared to patients with satisfactory postoperative course. FBS level on the day of surgery was within 20 mg/dL (1.11 mmol/L) of the expected range based on HbA1c measurement in 62 patients (28.44%), while in 146 patients (66.98%) the FBS was not within 20 mg/dl (1.11 mmol/L) of the expected range based on preoperative HbA1c level. Conclusion FBS levels on the day of surgery are not correlated with HbA1c levels and PPS outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Raed Almannie
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammed Aziz
- Faculty of Medicine, Urology, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt
| | - Mohammed Farag
- Urology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Assiut, Egypt
| | - David Ralph
- St Peter's Andrology Centre and the Institute of Urology, UCLH, London, UK
| | - John Mulhall
- Sexual and Reproductive Medicine Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer, New York, NY, USA
| | - Saleh Binsaleh
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Penile implant infection prevention part 1: what is fact and what is fiction? Wilson's Workshop #9. Int J Impot Res 2020; 33:785-792. [PMID: 32694583 DOI: 10.1038/s41443-020-0326-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2020] [Revised: 05/22/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) infections are undeniably devastating for patient and surgeon alike. While less common in this modern era, the landscape of prosthesis infection is shifting. Continued examination of risk factors for infection and re-evaluation of common practices remain critical should we aim to advance the field. Quality research on this topic is limited by several factors, among which small sample size and lack of coordinated effort pose the most precarious of challenges. Nonetheless, careful analysis of available data in conjuncture with judicious utilization of established research from other prosthetic fields can help us better grasp the issue at hand. In this review, we aim to do exactly that-to examine available evidence in an effort to discern fact from fiction. In this first part of the three part series, we aim to summarize our understanding of the pathogenesis behind prosthesis infections, explore known preoperative risk factors, and discuss intraoperative considerations for infection prevention. In the second part of this series, we will examine the game changing effect of infection retardant implant coatings. Part three of the series details postoperative prevention strategies, reviews salvage techniques, and discusses additional key considerations.
Collapse
|