|
1
|
Wu L, Wu H, Mu S, Li XY, Zhen YH, Li HY. Surgical approaches for complete rectal prolapse. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17:102043. [PMID: 40162412 PMCID: PMC11948122 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.102043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2024] [Revised: 12/02/2024] [Accepted: 01/11/2025] [Indexed: 02/24/2025] Open
Abstract
Complete rectal prolapse, characterized by the protrusion of the rectal wall layers through the anal canal, poses significant treatment challenges, particularly due to controversies surrounding surgical approaches and the absence of a standardized assessment system. This study comprehensively reviews the main surgical techniques for complete rectal prolapse, categorized as transabdominal and transperineal/transanal procedures. Despite various techniques, challenges persist, including high recurrence rates and potential complications. Factors influencing the choice of the surgical approach include patient characteristics, symptomatology, and surgical expertise. With advances in medical technology, laparoscopic and robotic surgeries offer promising avenues, albeit with considerations of cost and accessibility. Ultimately, treatment plans tailored to the individual needs of the patient and surgical expertise are essential. Although controversies remain, the continued refinement of surgical techniques holds promise for improving outcomes in complete rectal prolapse surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Long Wu
- Department of Anus and Intestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, Guizhou Province, China
| | - Huan Wu
- Department of Infectious Disease, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, Guizhou Province, China
| | - Song Mu
- Department of Anus and Intestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, Guizhou Province, China
| | - Xiao-Yun Li
- Department of Anus and Intestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, Guizhou Province, China
| | - Yun-Huan Zhen
- Department of Anus and Intestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, Guizhou Province, China
| | - Hai-Yang Li
- Key Laboratory of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases Treatment and Bioinformatics Research Guizhou Medical University, Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550000, Guizhou Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Maeda Y, Espin-Basany E, Gorissen K, Kim M, Lehur PA, Lundby L, Negoi I, Norcic G, O'Connell PR, Rautio T, van Geluwe B, van Ramshorst GH, Warwick A, Vaizey CJ. European Society of Coloproctology guidance on the use of mesh in the pelvis in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23:2228-2285. [PMID: 34060715 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Revised: 03/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
This is a comprehensive and rigorous review of currently available data on the use of mesh in the pelvis in colorectal surgery. This guideline outlines the limitations of available data and the challenges of interpretation, followed by best possible recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasuko Maeda
- Cumberland Infirmary and University of Edinburgh, Carlisle, UK
| | | | | | - Mia Kim
- Department of General, Gastrointestinal, Vascular and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | | | - Lilli Lundby
- Department of Surgery Pelvic Floor Unit, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Ionut Negoi
- Faculty of General Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Gregor Norcic
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - P Ronan O'Connell
- Department of Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Tero Rautio
- Medical Research Center, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | | | | | - Andrea Warwick
- QEII Jubilee Hospital, Acacia Ridge, Queensland, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Abstract
Complete rectal prolapse or rectal procidentia is a debilitating disease that presents with fecal incontinence, constipation, and rectal discharge. Definitive surgical techniques described for this disease include perineal procedures such as mucosectomy and rectosigmoidectomy, and abdominal procedures such as rectopexy with or without mesh and concomitant resection. The debate over these techniques regarding the lowest recurrence and morbidity rates, and the best functional outcomes for constipation or incontinence, has been going on for decades. The heterogeneity of available studies does not allow us to draw firm conclusions. This article aims to review the surgical techniques for complete rectal prolapse based on the current evidence base regarding surgical and functional outcomes.
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Tomochika S, Suzuki N, Yoshida S, Fujii T, Tokumitsu Y, Shindo Y, Iida M, Takeda S, Hazama S, Nagano H. Laparoscopic Sutureless Rectopexy Using a Fixation Device for Complete Rectal Prolapse. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2021; 31:608-612. [PMID: 34618787 PMCID: PMC8500361 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000000960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Complete rectal prolapse (CRP) commonly affects the daily life of older people and has no established operative treatment approach. We describe our simple method of laparoscopic, sutureless rectopexy, involving rectal mobilization (along with its peritoneum bilaterally) and fixation to the sacral promontory using a fixation device. We also present an analysis of short-term outcomes in patients treated using this procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively evaluated 62 patients with CRP, who underwent a laparoscopic rectopexy via tack fixation, between 2004 and 2017. The peritoneum was widely attached near the site of peritoneal reflection, as in rectal cancer surgery. The hypogastric nerve was carefully detached from the front of the sacrum. Keeping the nerve intact, we lifted and mobilized the dissected rectum cranially towards the promontory, and the rectal peritoneum was affixed to the sacrum by applying 2 to 3 fixed tacks bilaterally, using a fixation device. RESULTS The median age of the study group was 80 (10 to 91) years. All procedures were successful without serious intraoperative complications; only 1 patient required conversion to open surgery. Median values for operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative period of hospitalization were 177 (125 to 441) minutes, 5 (0 to 275) mL, and 7 (3 to 17) days, respectively. Only 6 (9.7%) patients experienced recurrence during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic tacking rectopexy performed using a fixation device for repairing CRP is a simple, safe, and sutureless procedure with no severe complications or mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinobu Tomochika
- Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Nobuaki Suzuki
- Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Shin Yoshida
- Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Toshiyuki Fujii
- Shunan Memorial Hospital, Shunan, Yamaguchi Prefecture, Japan
| | - Yukio Tokumitsu
- Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Yoshitaro Shindo
- Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Michihisa Iida
- Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Shigeru Takeda
- Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Shoichi Hazama
- Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine
- Department of Translational Research and Developmental Therapeutics against Cancer, Yamaguchi University Faculty of Medicine, Ube
| | - Hiroaki Nagano
- Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
|
5
|
Gallo G, Martellucci J, Pellino G, Ghiselli R, Infantino A, Pucciani F, Trompetto M. Consensus Statement of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR): management and treatment of complete rectal prolapse. Tech Coloproctol 2018; 22:919-931. [PMID: 30554284 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-018-1908-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2018] [Accepted: 12/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Rectal prolapse, rectal procidentia, "complete" prolapse or "third-degree" prolapse is the full-thickness prolapse of the rectal wall through the anal canal and has a significant impact on quality of life. The incidence of rectal prolapse has been estimated to be approximately 2.5 per 100,000 inhabitants with a clear predominance among elderly women. The aim of this consensus statement was to provide evidence-based data to allow an individualized and appropriate management and treatment of complete rectal prolapse. The strategy used to search for evidence was based on application of electronic sources such as MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Review Library, CINAHL and EMBASE. The recommendations were defined and graded based on the current levels of evidence and in accordance with the criteria adopted by the American College of Gastroenterology's Chronic Constipation Task Force. Five evidence levels were defined. The recommendations were graded A, B, and C.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Gallo
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Santa Rita Clinic, Vercelli, Italy
- Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - J Martellucci
- Department of General, Emergency and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - G Pellino
- Department of Medical, Surgical, Neurological, Metabolic and Ageing Sciences, Unit of General Surgery, Università della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
- Colorectal Unit, Hospital Universitario y Politecnico La Fe, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - R Ghiselli
- Department of General Surgery, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - A Infantino
- Department of Surgery, Santa Maria dei Battuti Hospital, San Vito al Tagliamento, Pordenone, Italy
| | - F Pucciani
- Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - M Trompetto
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Santa Rita Clinic, Vercelli, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
|
6
|
Abstract
Rectal prolapse is associated with debilitating symptoms and leads to both functional impairment and anatomic distortion. Symptoms include rectal bulge, mucous drainage, bleeding, incontinence, constipation, tenesmus, as well as discomfort, pressure, and pain. The only cure is surgical. The optimal surgical repair is not yet defined though laparoscopic rectopexy with mesh is emerging as a more durable approach. The chosen approach should be individually tailored, taking into account factors such as presence of pelvic floor defects and coexistence of vaginal prolapse, severe constipation, surgical fitness, and whether the patient has had a previous prolapse procedure. Consideration of a multidisciplinary approach is critical in patients with concomitant vaginal prolapse. Surgeons must weigh their familiarity with each approach and should have in their armamentarium both perineal and abdominal approaches. Previous barriers to abdominal procedures, such as age and comorbidities, are waning as minimally invasive approaches have gained acceptance. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy is one such approach offering relatively low morbidity, low recurrence rates, and good functional improvement. However, proficiency with this procedure may require advanced training. Robotic rectopexy is another burgeoning approach which facilitates suturing in the pelvis. Successful rectal prolapse surgeries improve function and have low recurrence rates, though it is important to note that correcting the prolapse does not assure functional improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Hrabe
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease & Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Brooke Gurland
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease & Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
Moghadamyeghaneh Z, Hanna MH, Hwang G, Carmichael JC, Mills SD, Pigazzi A, Stamos MJ. Surgical management of rectal prolapse: The role of robotic surgery. World J Surg Proced 2015; 5:99-105. [DOI: 10.5412/wjsp.v5.i1.99] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2014] [Revised: 11/25/2014] [Accepted: 12/17/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The robotic technique as a safe approach in treatment of rectal prolapse has been widely reported during the last decade. Although there is limited clinical data regarding the benefits of robotic surgery, the safety of robotic surgery in rectal prolapse treatment has been cited by several authors. Also, the robotic approach helps overcome some of the laparoscopic approach challenges with purported advantages including improved visualization, more precise dissection, easier suturing, accurate identification of anatomic structures and fewer conversions to open surgery which can facilitate the conduct of technically challenging cases. These advantages can make robotic surgery ideally suited for minimally invasive ventral rectopexy. Currently, with greater surgeon experience in robotic surgery, the length of the procedure and the recurrence rate with the robotic approach are decreasing and short term outcomes for robotic rectal prolapse seem on par with laparoscopic and open techniques in recent studies. However, the high cost of robotic procedures is still an important issue. The benefits of a robotic approach must be weighed against the higher cost. More research is needed to better understand if the increased cost is justified by an improvement in outcomes. Also, published articles comparing long term outcomes of the robotic approach with other approaches are very limited at this time and further clinical trials are indicated to affirm the role of robotic surgery in the treatment of rectal prolapse.
Collapse
|
|
9
|
Mik M, Trzcinski R, Kujawski R, Dziki L, Tchorzewski M, Dziki A. Rectal Prolapse in Women-Outcomes of Perineal and Abdominal Approaches. Indian J Surg 2014; 77:1121-5. [PMID: 27011522 DOI: 10.1007/s12262-014-1196-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2014] [Accepted: 11/07/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of the study was to assess the clinical and functional results of surgical treatment of female patients with rectal prolapse. In the period of 2003-2010, the group of 86 female patients (mean age of 67 ± 10) underwent surgery due to rectal prolapse. The group of 24 patients (27.9 %) suffered from mild anal incontinence. They were operated on with open sutured rectopexy (18 pts), Altemeier (45 pts) and Delorme procedure (23 pts). Prior to surgery and after operation, clinical and function results were obtained. The follow-up period amounted to 32 ± 11 months. In perineal approaches, we found mortality in one patient (1.4 %, Delorme) and anastomotic leak in four patients (5.9 %). The recurrence rate in the perineal group was 11.8 % (eight patients). We noted one recurrence in the rectopexy group (5.6 %). The Altemeier procedure revealed the most significant impact on the function of the anal sphincter muscles and resting pressures (42 ± 7 vs 53 ± 9 cm H2O; p = 0.0082). If anterior levatoroplasty was added, the benefits referred also to squeeze pressures (41 ± 8 vs 58 ± 9 cm H2O; p = 0.006 and 42 ± 10 vs 56 ± 9 cm H2O; p = 0.01). In the treatment of rectal prolapse, there is still no consensus about the operation of choice. Selection of the appropriate method should be based on clinical findings and patients' comorbidities to obtain maximal benefits and minimize the postoperative risk and failures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michal Mik
- Department of General and Colorectal Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, Plac Hallera 1, 90-647 Lodz, Poland
| | - Radzislaw Trzcinski
- Department of General and Colorectal Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, Plac Hallera 1, 90-647 Lodz, Poland
| | - Ryszard Kujawski
- Department of General and Colorectal Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, Plac Hallera 1, 90-647 Lodz, Poland
| | - Lukasz Dziki
- Department of General and Colorectal Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, Plac Hallera 1, 90-647 Lodz, Poland
| | - Marcin Tchorzewski
- Department of General and Colorectal Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, Plac Hallera 1, 90-647 Lodz, Poland
| | - Adam Dziki
- Department of General and Colorectal Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, Plac Hallera 1, 90-647 Lodz, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
|
10
|
Abstract
Rectal prolapse continues to be problematic for both patients and surgeons alike, in part because of increased recurrence rates despite several well-described operations. Patients should be aware that although the prolapse will resolve with operative therapy, functional results may continue to be problematic. This article describes the recommended evaluation, role of adjunctive testing, and outcomes associated with both perineal and abdominal approaches.
Collapse
|
|
11
|
Abstract
Rectal prolapse is a condition that usually requires surgical intervention to correct. Abdominal and perineal approaches are well described in the literature. Abdominal approaches have traditionally been reserved for young healthy patients, but this has been challenged by perineal approaches with excellent outcomes. Laparoscopic techniques have been shown to be effective and equivalent to traditional laparotomy techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott D Goldstein
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
12
|
Cadeddu F, Sileri P, Grande M, De Luca E, Franceschilli L, Milito G. Focus on abdominal rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: meta-analysis of literature. Tech Coloproctol 2011; 16:37-53. [PMID: 22170252 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-011-0798-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2011] [Accepted: 11/23/2011] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic rectopexy to treat full-thickness rectal prolapse has proven short-term benefits, but there are few long-term follow-up and functional outcome data available. Using meta-analysis techniques, this study was designed to evaluate long-term results of open and laparoscopic abdominal procedures to treat full-thickness rectal prolapse in adults. METHODS A literature review was performed using the National Library of Medicine's PubMed database. All articles on abdominal rectopexy patients with a follow-up longer than 16 months were considered. The primary end point was recurrence of rectal prolapse, and the secondary end points were improvement in incontinence and constipation. A random effect model was used to aggregate the studies reporting these outcomes, and heterogeneity was assessed. RESULTS Eight comparative studies, consisting of a total of 467 patients (275 open and 192 laparoscopic), were included. Analysis of the data suggested that there is no significant difference in recurrence, incontinence and constipation improvement between laparoscopic abdominal rectopexy and open abdominal rectopexy. Considering non-comparative trials, the event rate for recurrence was similar in open and laparoscopic suture rectopexy studies and in open and laparoscopic mesh rectopexy trials. Improvement in constipation after the intervention was not statistically significant except for open mesh repair; postoperative improvement in incontinence was statistically significant after laparoscopic procedures and open mesh rectopexy. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic abdominal rectopexy is a safe and feasible procedure, which may compare equally with the open technique with regard to recurrence, incontinence and constipation. However, large-scale randomized trials, with comparative, strong methodology, are still needed to identify outcome measures accurately.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Cadeddu
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford 81, 00133, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
13
|
Feyen BJ, Rao SSC. Functional disorders of defecation: evaluation and treatment. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2011; 10:221-30. [PMID: 17547860 DOI: 10.1007/s11938-007-0015-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Functional disorders of defecation are common and often overlap with slow-transit constipation. They are comprised of functional obstructive conditions such as dyssynergic defecation, as well as structural obstructive conditions such as rectal prolapse, excessive perineal descent, and rectocele. Evaluation includes detailed history and rectal and pelvic exam together with physiologic tests such as anorectal manometry, balloon expulsion test, defecography, and MRI. Treatment involves several medical, behavioral, and surgical approaches. Recently, randomized controlled trials have shown that biofeedback therapy is an effective treatment for dyssynergic defecation. Stapled transanal rectal resection appears to be a promising technique for treating defecation disorders associated with rectocele, excessive perineal descent, and mucosal intussusception, but controlled trials are lacking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan J Feyen
- Satish S.C. Rao, MD, PhD, FRCP The University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics, Internal Medicine, GI Division, 200 Hawkins Drive, 4612 JCP, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
14
|
Yoon SG. Rectal prolapse: review according to the personal experience. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN SOCIETY OF COLOPROCTOLOGY 2011; 27:107-13. [PMID: 21829764 PMCID: PMC3145880 DOI: 10.3393/jksc.2011.27.3.107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2010] [Accepted: 07/26/2010] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The aim of treatment of rectal prolapse is to control the prolapse, restore continence, and prevent constipation or impaired evacuation. Faced with a multitude of options, the choice of an optimal treatment is difficult. It is best tailored to patient and surgeon. Numerous procedures have been described and are generally categorized into perineal or abdominal approaches. In general, an abdominal procedure has associated with lower recurrence and better functional outcome than perineal procedures. The widespread success of laparoscopic surgery has led to the development of laparoscopic procedures in the treatment of complete rectal prolapse. In Korea, there has been a trend toward offering perineal procedures because of the high incidence of rectal prolapse in young males and its being a lesser procedure. Delorme-Thiersch procedure has appeal as a lesser procedure for patients of any age or risk category, especially for elderly low-risk patients, patients with constipation or evacuation difficulties, young males, and patients with symptomatic hemorrhoids or mucosal prolapse. Laparoscopic suture rectopexy is recommended for either low-risk female patients or patients who are concerned with postoperative aggravation of their incontinence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seo-Gue Yoon
- Department of Surgery, Seoul Song Do Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
|
15
|
Otto SD, Ritz JP, Gröne J, Buhr HJ, Kroesen AJ. Abdominal resection rectopexy with an absorbable polyglactin mesh: prospective evaluation of morphological and functional changes with consecutive improvement of patient's symptoms. World J Surg 2011; 34:2710-6. [PMID: 20703473 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-010-0735-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The pathophysiology of rectal prolapse and intussusception has not yet been clarified. This is reflected in the multiplicity of surgical procedures. The aim of this prospective study was to measure morphological and functional changes of the pelvic floor and the rectum before and after resection rectopexy. METHODS A total of 21 patients (mean age 60 years; 2 men, 19 women) with manifest rectal prolapse and rectoanal intussusception underwent sigmoidectomy and rectopexy with an absorbable polyglactin mesh graft. The following analyses were performed preoperatively and, on average, 15 months (range 6-21 month) postoperatively: radiologic defecography, rectal volumetry, sphincter manometry, and evaluation of clinical symptoms. RESULTS Postoperatively there was no patient with rectal prolapse, and only one with an intussusception. Rectal compliance increased from 6.4 to 10.2 ml/mmHg. Rectal volumetry showed a decrease of the thresholds for the sensation of "desire to defecate" and "maximal tolerated volume" (100-75 ml, 175-150 ml). Postoperatively, there was a higher level of the pelvic floor during contraction. The anorectal angle, vector volume, radial asymmetry, sphincter length, and resting and squeezing pressures were unchanged. Surgery improved rectal evacuation (p = 0.03), continence (p = 0.01), stool consistency (p = 0.03), and warning period (p = 0.01). Patients' personal assessment showed an improved overall satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS Resection rectopexy is a reliable method for treating rectal prolapse and rectoanal intussusception with clear improvement of the patient's clinical symptoms. The restored anorectal function can be attributed to improved rectal compliance, a lower sensory threshold, an elevation of the pelvic floor during squeezing, and an improved rectal evacuation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S D Otto
- Department of Surgery, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
16
|
Shin EJ. Surgical treatment of rectal prolapse. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN SOCIETY OF COLOPROCTOLOGY 2011; 27:5-12. [PMID: 21431090 PMCID: PMC3053504 DOI: 10.3393/jksc.2011.27.1.5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2010] [Accepted: 08/06/2010] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Rectal prolapse is defined as a protrusion of the rectum beyond the anus. Although rectal prolapse was recognized as early as 1500 BC, the optimal surgical procedure is still debated. The varied operative procedures available for treating rectal prolapsed can be confusing. The aim of treatment is to control the prolapse, restore continence, and prevent constipation or impaired evacuation. In elderly and high-risk patients, perineal approaches, such as Delorme's operation and Altemeier's operation, have been preferred, although the incidence of recurrence and the rate of persistent incontinence seem to be high when compared with transabdominal procedures. Abdominal operations involve dissection and fixation of the rectum and may include a rectosigmoid resection. From the late twentieth century, the laparoscopic procedure has been applied to the treatment of rectal prolapse. Current laparoscopic surgical techniques include suture rectopexy, stapled rectopexy, posterior mesh rectopexy with artificial material, and resection of the sigmoid colon with colorectal anastomosis with or without rectopexy. The choice of surgery depends on the status of the patient and the surgeon's preference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eung Jin Shin
- Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
|
17
|
Abstract
Rectal prolapse is a troublesome anorectal disorder. Surgical procedures for rectal prolapse contain transabdominal and transperineal approaches. There are hundreds of transabdominal procedures currently available for treatment of the disease, such as Ripstein procedure, Wells procedure, Orr procedure, Nigro procedure, anterior resection, Frykman-Goldberg procedure, and Roscoe Graham procedure. Laparoscopic repair represents the latest advance in surgical treatment of rectal prolapse. As each procedure has its strength and weakness, personalized selection of appropriate procedure can greatly improve surgical outcome. Individualized diagnosis and treatment plan may represent a new direction for transabdominal surgical treatment of rectal prolapse.
Collapse
|
|
18
|
Hernández P, Targarona EM, Balagué C, Martínez C, Pallares JL, Garriga J, Trias M. [Laparoscopic treatment of rectal prolapse]. Cir Esp 2010; 84:318-22. [PMID: 19087777 DOI: 10.1016/s0009-739x(08)75042-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Rectal prolapse is an uncommon disease mainly seen in patients of advanced age. It is treated surgically, although there is still significant controversy as regards the most appropriate technique. In the last few years the laparoscopic route has been shown to be feasible and has the advantage of being a minimally invasive technique. OBJECTIVE To present the preliminary results of a series of patients with rectal prolapse, the majority of whom were treated by performing a laparoscopic posterior rectopexy. MATERIAL AND METHOD Between February 1998 and February 2008, 17 patients diagnosed with total rectal prolapse were operated on. In 15 cases, a Wells type posterior rectopexy was performed and in the other two a sigmoidectomy was done. The pre-surgical characteristics, as well as the immediate post-surgical results and the long-term follow up results were analysed. RESULTS The mean age of the series was 63 (21-87) years, with a mean operation time of 186 (105-240) min and a conversion index of 6.6%. There was no post-surgical morbidity and mortality and the mean hospital stay was 5.2 (3-8) days. The mean follow-up was 39 (6-96) months with no relapses seen. One patient had an intralumen migration of the mesh which was expulsed via the rectum, two years after the surgery. One patient died during follow-up due to his underlying severe cardio-respiratory disease. The prolapse re-occurred in one patient after a sigmoidectomy. Eight patients (53%) previously had constipation and in six cases (40%), incontinence. In the post-surgical reviews, constipation persisted in three patients (20%) and a it was seen de novo in one case (6.6%). The incontinence was resolved in four cases (26%) and persisting in two patients (13%). CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic rectopexy is a good technical option with a low morbidity-mortality and a reduced hospital stay, as well as good results in the long-term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pilar Hernández
- Servei de Cirurgia, Hospital de Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
19
|
Comparison of perineal operations with abdominal operations for full-thickness rectal prolapse. World J Surg 2010; 34:1116-22. [PMID: 20127331 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-010-0429-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We can divide surgery for rectal prolapse into two broad categories: abdominal and perineal. However, few studies compare the long-term outcomes and quality of life among operations for full-thickness rectal prolapse. The purpose of this study was to compare abdominal (AO) versus perineal (PO) procedures for the treatment of full-thickness rectal prolapse regarding recurrence rate, incontinence, constipation, and quality of life. METHODS Records of 177 operations from 1995 to 2001 were reviewed retrospectively. A telephone survey was attempted for all. Seventy-five (42%) responded to the Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score (CCIS), KESS Constipation Score (KESS-CS), and SF-36 Quality of Life Score. Appropriate statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS For the 122 AO and 55 PO, there were no deaths. Mean follow-up was similar (PO 3.1 vs. AO 3.9 years; P = 0.306). As expected the PO patients were older (mean 69 vs. 55 years) and had higher ASA scores. Those undergoing PO had less procedural blood loss, operative time, hospital stay, and dietary restriction. The PO group also scored worse on the physical component of SF-36 (PO 33 vs. AO 39.6; P = 0.034). However, the rate of recurrent prolapse was significantly higher for the PO (PO 26.5% vs. AO 5.2%; P < 0.001). Complications, CCIS, KESS-CS, and SF-36 mental component were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS In full-thickness rectal prolapse, elderly, sick patients are selected for a perineal operation. The morbidity, functional outcomes, and quality of life are acceptable. However, the high recurrence rates make the perineal operation a second-best choice for younger, healthy patients.
Collapse
|
|
20
|
Abstract
The management of full-thickness rectal prolapse involves surgical intervention in the majority of cases. Many procedures have been described employing both perineal and abdominal approaches. Abdominal procedures result in more durable repair of the prolapse; however, the procedures require general anesthesia and are reserved for younger healthier patients. Laparoscopy has been utilized in the treatment of rectal prolapse since its introduction for colorectal procedures; recent studies have found equivalent long-term results and short-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bashar Safar
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
21
|
Voulimeneas I, Antonopoulos C, Alifierakis E, Ioannides P. Perineal rectosigmoidectomy for gangrenous rectal prolapse. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16:2689-91. [PMID: 20518093 PMCID: PMC2880784 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i21.2689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Incarceration rarely complicates the chronically progressive form of the full thickness rectal prolapse. Even more rarely, it becomes strangulated, necessitating emergency surgery. We describe an extremely rare case of incarcerated acute rectal prolapse, without a relevant previous history or symptoms of predisposing pathology. The patient underwent emergency perineal proctosigmoidectomy, the Altemeier operation, combined with diverting loop sigmoid colostomy. The postoperative course was quite uneventful with an excellent final result after colostomy closure. The successful treatment of this patient illustrates the value of the Altemeier procedure in the difficult and unusual case scenario of bowel incarceration.
Collapse
|
|
22
|
Sajid MS, Siddiqui MRS, Baig MK. Open vs laparoscopic repair of full-thickness rectal prolapse: a re-meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12:515-25. [PMID: 20557324 DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01886.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A re-meta-analysis of available data within the published literature comparing laparoscopic rectopexy (LR) with open repair (OR). METHOD We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PubMed and the Cochrane databases from January 1990 to October 2008. We searched the following MESH terms: 'laparoscopy', 'prolapse' and 'rectal prolapse'. We used the following text words: 'rectopexy', 'haemorrhoids', 'minimally invasive' and 'keyhole surgery'. The bibliography of selected trials and a Cochrane review was scrutinized and relevant references obtained. Selected trials were analysed to conduct a meta-analysis. RESULTS Twelve comparative studies on 688 patients qualified for the review. There were 330 patients in LR group and 358 in the OR group. LR takes longer to perform compared with OR. This difference was statistically significant [random effects model: standardized mean difference (SMD) 1.63, 95% CI (1.14-2.12), z = 6.56, P < 0.001]. There was a significant reduction in hospital stay between LR vs OR [random effects model: SMD -1.75, 95% CI (-2.45 to -1.05), z = -4.90, P < 0.001]. There was no statistical difference relating to morbidity, constipation, incontinence or mortality between the two groups. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic rectopexy is a safe and effective modality and is comparable to OR, however, there is still a paucity of randomized controlled trials within the literature regarding this subject. Until these trials are conducted, we would advise caution in deriving absolute conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M S Sajid
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Worthing Hospital, Worthing, West Sussex, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
23
|
Surgical management of rectal prolapse: in the era of laparoscopic surgery. Eur Surg 2009. [DOI: 10.1007/s10353-009-0484-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
|
24
|
Affiliation(s)
- James S Wu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Mayfield Heights, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
25
|
Talley NJ, Lasch KL, Baum CL. A gap in our understanding: chronic constipation and its comorbid conditions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 7:9-19. [PMID: 18829389 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2008] [Revised: 06/24/2008] [Accepted: 07/11/2008] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Constipation is one of the most common digestive disorders in the United States; however, the association of this condition with related comorbidities, both gastrointestinal and extraintestinal, is poorly documented. Here, we have reviewed the association of constipation with specific comorbidities. The data suggest that there are considerable clinical consequences associated with constipation. Ultimately, realization of the disease risks associated with chronic constipation may provide the impetus needed to direct new research, and shift attention on the part of patients and practitioners to methods for preventing significant and potentially costly comorbid medical problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas J Talley
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
26
|
Marderstein EL, Delaney CP. Surgical management of rectal prolapse. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2007; 4:552-61. [PMID: 17909532 DOI: 10.1038/ncpgasthep0952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2007] [Accepted: 08/09/2007] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
This article reviews the pathogenesis, clinical presentation and surgical management of rectal prolapse. Full-thickness prolapse of the rectum causes significant discomfort because of the sensation of the prolapse itself, the mucus that it secretes, and because it tends to stretch the anal sphincters and cause incontinence. Treatment of rectal prolapse is primarily surgical. Perineal surgical repairs are well tolerated, but are generally associated with higher recurrence rates. Abdominal repairs involve fixing the rectum to the sacrum by using either mesh or sutures, and tend to have the lowest recurrence rates. If significant preoperative constipation is present, a sigmoid resection can be performed at the time of rectopexy. For many patients, diarrhea and incontinence improve after surgery. Laparoscopic repair of rectal prolapse has similar morbidity and recurrence rates to open surgery, with attendant benefits of reduced length of hospital stay, postoperative pain and wound complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric L Marderstein
- Division of Colorectal Surgery and Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44106-5047, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
27
|
MIYAJIMA N, OTAKI S, YAMAKAWA T. Experience with Laparoscopic Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse. Dig Endosc 2007. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.1996.tb00445.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Nobuyoshi MIYAJIMA
- Department of Surgery, Teikyo University Hospital, Mizonokuchi, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Shuji OTAKI
- Department of Surgery, Teikyo University Hospital, Mizonokuchi, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Tatsuo YAMAKAWA
- Department of Surgery, Teikyo University Hospital, Mizonokuchi, Kawasaki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
|
28
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Rectal prolapse, or procidentia, is defined as a protrusion of the rectum beyond the anus. It commonly occurs at the extremes of age. Rectal prolapse frequently coexists with other pelvic floor disorders, and patients have symptoms associated with combined rectal and genital prolapse. Few patients, a lack of randomized trials and difficulties in the interpretation of studies of anorectal physiology have made the understanding of this disorder difficult. METHODS OF TREATMENT Surgical management is aimed at restoring physiology by correcting the prolapse and improving continence and constipation, whereas in patients with concurrent genital and rectal prolapse, an interdisciplinary surgical approach is required. Operation should be reserved for those patients in whom medical treatment has failed, and it may be expected to relieve symptoms. Numerous surgical procedures have been suggested to treat rectal prolapse. They are generally classified as abdominal or perineal according to the route of access. However, the controversy as to which operation is appropriate cannot be answered definitively, as the extent of a standardized diagnostic assessment and the types of surgical procedures have not been identified in published series. LITERATURE REVIEW This review encompasses rectal prolapse, including aetiology, symptoms and treatment. The English-language literature about rectal prolapse was identified using Medline, and additional cited works not detected in the initial search were obtained. Articles reporting on prospective and retrospective comparisons and case reports were included.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stavros Gourgiotis
- Clinical Attachment in Division of General Surgery and Oncology, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, 21 Millersdale Road, Mossley Hill, L18 5HG, Liverpool, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
29
|
Meurette G, Regenet N, Frampas E, Sagan C, Le Borgne J, Lehur PA. [The solitary rectal ulcer syndrome]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2006; 30:382-90. [PMID: 16633303 DOI: 10.1016/s0399-8320(06)73192-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The solitary rectal ulcer syndrome is a rare debilitating disorder of the rectum characterized by perianal chronic pain with passage of blood and mucus. The pathogenesis remains uncertain, rectal prolapse and trauma from straining are the main hypothesis. The diagnosis includes clinical symptoms associated with endoscopic lesion (erythema, ulcer or polypoïd lesion) and histological features. Mano-metric studies and defecography are helpful to determinate an underlying defecation disorder or rectal prolapse. The treatment is controversial including a conservative option (medications and behavioural therapy) with poor long term results, and the surgical option (treatment of a rectal prolapse with or without resection of the lesion), more aggressive with uncertain results in a long follow-up period.
Collapse
|
|
30
|
Carpelan-Holmström M, Kruuna O, Scheinin T. Laparoscopic rectal prolapse surgery combined with short hospital stay is safe in elderly and debilitated patients. Surg Endosc 2006; 20:1353-9. [PMID: 16703440 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-005-0217-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2005] [Accepted: 12/18/2005] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We report the results of patients treated from January 2000 to June 2004 for full-thickness rectal prolapse with trans-abdominal surgery in Helsinki. METHODS Sixty-five of 75 patients were treated laparoscopically, with a 6% conversion rate. Ten patients were operated on openly. Half of the patients were scored as American Society for Anesthesiologists III or IV. RESULTS The operation time was similar in the laparoscopic and the open rectopexy procedures (p = 0.15), whereas laparoscopic resection rectopexy was more time-consuming compared to the open procedure (p = 0.007). Intraoperative bleeding during laparoscopic surgery was minimal in comparison to open surgery (p = 0.006). Patients treated laparoscopically had a shorter median hospital stay than those treated with an open procedure (rectopexy, 3 and 7 days, respectively; resection rectopexy, 4 and 7.5 days, respectively) (p < 0.00001). There was no mortality and minor morbidity. During follow-up, there were two prolapse recurrences. All surgical techniques improved fecal continence considerably. Eighty-four percent of rectopexy patients and 92% of resection rectopexy patients considered the surgical outcome to be excellent or good. CONCLUSIONS Both rectopexy and resection rectopexy cure prolapse with good results and can be performed safely in older and debilitated patients. The laparoscopic approach enables a shortened hospital stay and is well tolerated in elderly patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Carpelan-Holmström
- Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Lapinlahdenkatu 16, 00290 HUS, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
31
|
Muñoz F, del Valle E, Rodríguez M, Zorrilla J. [Rectal prolapse. Abdominal or perineal approach? Current situation]. Cir Esp 2006; 78 Suppl 3:50-8. [PMID: 16478616 DOI: 10.1016/s0009-739x(05)74644-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Rectal prolapse is a major challenge for the surgeon who has to resolve the anatomical problem and the functional disturbances in the same procedure. Abdominal procedures are the most appropriate in young patients, and the most common technique is rectopexia with or without resection. The use of mesh or sutures provides the same results and the choice depends on the surgeon's preference. Laparoscopic surgery has been demonstrated to have similar efficacy to conventional surgery and may become the option of the future. The perineal approach is the best option in elderly patients and in those with associated morbidity; the Delorme technique is simple to carry out, but rectosigmoidectomy provides better results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando Muñoz
- Unidad de Coloproctología, Cirugía General l, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, 28033 Madrid, Spain.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
32
|
Kariv Y, Delaney CP, Casillas S, Hammel J, Nocero J, Bast J, Brady K, Fazio VW, Senagore AJ. Long-term outcome after laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal prolapse: a case-control study. Surg Endosc 2005; 20:35-42. [PMID: 16374674 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-005-3012-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2005] [Accepted: 08/26/2005] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic repair (LR) of rectal prolapse is potentially associated with earlier recovery and lower perioperative morbidity, as compared with open transabdominal repair (OR). Data on the long-term recurrence rate and functional outcome are limited. METHODS Perioperative data on rectal prolapse in relation to all LRs performed between December 1991 and April 2004 were prospectively collected. The LR patients were matched by age, gender, and procedure type with OR patients who underwent surgery during the same period. Patients with previous complex abdominal surgery or a body mass index exceeding 40 were excluded from the study. Data on recurrence rate, bowel habits, continence, and satisfaction scores were collected using a telephone survey. RESULTS A total of 111 patients (age, 56.8 +/- 18.1 years; female, 87%) underwent attempted LR. An operative complication deferred repair in two cases. Among the 111 patients, 42 had posterior mesh fixation, and 67 had sutured rectopexy (32 patients with sigmoid colectomy for constipation). Eight patients (7.2%) had conversion to laparotomy. Matching was established for 86 patients. The LR patients had a shorter hospital stay (mean, 3.9 vs 6.0 days; p < 0.0001). The 30-day reoperation and readmission rates were similar for the two groups. The rates for recurrence requiring surgery were 9.3% for LR and 4.7% for OR (p = 0.39) during a mean follow-up period of 59 months. An additional seven patients in each group reported possible recurrence by telephone. Postoperatively, 35% of the LR patients and 53% of the OR patients experienced constipation (p = 0.09). Constipation was improved in 74% of the LR patients and 54% of the OR patients, and worsened, respectively, in 3% and 17% (p = 0.037). The postoperative incontinence rates were 30% for LR and 33% for OR (p = 0.83). Continence was improved in 48% of the LR patients and 35% of the OR patients, and worsened, respectively, in 9% and 18% (p = 0.22). The mean satisfaction rates for surgery (on a scale of 0 to 10) were 7.3 for the LR patients and 8.1 for the OR patients (p = 0.17). CONCLUSIONS The hospital stay is shorter for LR than for OR. Both functional results and recurrent full-thickness rectal prolapse were similar for LR and OR during a mean follow-up period of 5 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Kariv
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
33
|
Marzouk D, Ramdass MJ, Haji A, Akhtar M. Digital assessment of lower rectum fixity in rectal prolapse (DALR): a simple clinical anatomical test to determine the most suitable approach (abdominal versus perineal) for repair. Surg Radiol Anat 2005; 27:414-9. [PMID: 16136275 DOI: 10.1007/s00276-005-0010-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2004] [Accepted: 05/12/2005] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Selection of an appropriate approach to treat full thickness rectal prolapse remains problematic and controversial. We propose that rectal prolapse may be classified as 'low type' (true rectal prolapse) or 'high type' (intussusception of the sigmoid with a fixed lower rectum). This assessment can be made via a simple clinical test of digital rectal assessment of lower rectal fixity ('the hook test') based on anatomic changes in rectal prolapse to guide the selection process. In cases with the low-type prolapse, a perineal approach is appropriate (either Delorme's procedure, or rectosigmoidectomy with or without pelvic floor repair). For the high type, an abdominal rectopexy with or without high anterior resection is needed. Retrospective analysis of our cases treated over the last 6 years showed a recurrence rate of 6% in perineal procedures and 0% in abdominal rectopexy combined with resection to date. We believe that employing our simple test and classification can contribute to better patient selection for either approach, minimize anaesthetic and surgical risks and also result in lower recurrence rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deya Marzouk
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Margate, Kent, England
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
34
|
Abstract
This review describes the pathogenesis, diagnosis, preoperative testing, and surgical decision making involved in the management of full-thickness rectal protrusion in adults. Historic and current procedures are described in detail. No one procedure is favored over others, and selection depends on the individual characteristics of the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James S Wu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, A30, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
35
|
|
|
36
|
Felt-Bersma RJ, Cuesta MA. Rectal prolapse, rectal intussusception, rectocele, and solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2001; 30:199-222. [PMID: 11394031 DOI: 10.1016/s0889-8553(05)70174-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 119] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Rectal prolapse can be diagnosed easily by having the patient strain as if to defecate. A laparoscopic rectopexy should be recommended. Intussusception is more an epiphenomenon than a cause of defecatory disorder and should be managed conservatively. Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome is a consequence of chronic straining, and therapy should include restoring a normal defecation habit. Rectocele should be left alone; an operation may be considered if it is larger than 3 cm and is causing profound symptoms despite maximizing medical therapy for the associated defecation disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R J Felt-Bersma
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Rotterdam Dijkzigt, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
37
|
|
|
38
|
Schultz I, Mellgren A, Dolk A, Johansson C, Holmström B. Long-term results and functional outcome after Ripstein rectopexy. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43:35-43. [PMID: 10813121 DOI: 10.1007/bf02237241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate operative mortality, morbidity, and functional results after Ripstein rectopexy for rectal prolapse and internal rectal intussusception. METHODS Sixty-nine patients with rectal prolapse and 43 with internal rectal intussusception were included. All patient records were studied and complications registered. Long-term follow-up was possible in 105 patients and performed by clinical examination and standardized interview, telephone interview, or patient records. Seventy-six patients were prospectively evaluated, comparing bowel function before and after rectopexy. RESULTS There was no operative mortality. Operative morbidity was 33 percent, and most complications were minor. Severe early complications included one large-bowel obstruction and one transient ureteric stenosis. Median time of follow-up was seven years in patients with rectal prolapse and 5.4 years in patients with internal rectal intussusception. Late complications included two rectovaginal fistulas and one lethal sigmoid fecaloma. Five patients underwent subtotal colectomy for severe constipation. There was one recurrent prolapse (1.6 percent). Functional evaluation showed that incontinence improved (P = 0.049), whereas the number of bowel movements per week decreased (P < 0.001). Frequency of emptying difficulties did not change significantly in patients with rectal prolapse but increased in patients with internal rectal intussusception (P = 0.038). CONCLUSION Ripstein rectopexy can be performed with low mortality and recurrence rate, but with a high early complication rate. There were also some serious late complications. Continence was improved, although increased constipation was a problem in some patients, especially among those with internal rectal intussusception.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Schultz
- Department of Surgery, Karolinska Institutet at Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
39
|
Araki Y, Isomoto H, Tsuzi Y, Matsumoto A, Yasunaga M, Yamauchi K, Hayashi K, Kodama T. Transsacral rectopexy for recurrent complete rectal prolapse. Surg Today 1999; 29:970-2. [PMID: 10489150 DOI: 10.1007/bf02482800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine the functional outcome of transsacral rectopexy performed with Dexon mesh for recurrent complete rectal prolapse. Anorectal function was assessed by anorectal manometry and defecography, before and from 1 year after surgery in five patients who were followed up for 1-3 years. The fecal incontinence score recovered from a preoperative mean score of 3.8 to a postoperative mean score of 1.2, and constipation was improved in four patients (80%). The straining anorectal angle (S-ARA), measured by defecography, improved from a preoperative value of 120.6 degrees +/- 6.9 degrees to a postoperative value of 98.5 degrees +/- 3.5 degrees (P < 0.05), and the perineal descent (PD) improved from a preoperative value of 16.2 +/- 2.5 cm to a postoperative value of 8.1 +/- 1.3 cm (P < 0.05). The maximal resting pressure (MRP) increased from a preoperative value of 20.5 +/- 3.7 cmH2O to a postoperative value of 40.5 +/- 4.8 cmH2O (P < 0.05). These findings indicate that transsacral rectopexy with Dexon mesh can achieve good control of recurrent complete rectal prolapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Araki
- Department of Surgery, Kurume University Medical Center, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
40
|
Aitola, Hiltunen, Matikainen. The effect of abdominal rectopexy with mesh on anal sphincter and bowel function in patients with complete rectal prolapse; special reference to age of patient. Colorectal Dis 1999; 1:222-6. [PMID: 23577810 DOI: 10.1046/j.1463-1318.1999.00054.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The main source of concern in patients with rectal prolapse is usually incontinence and constipation developing post-operatively. It has been claimed that sphincter pressures improve only after non-implant surgery. The aim of this study was to assess our own results after mesh rectopexy. PATIENTS AND METHODS We reviewed the results in 50 patients on whom posterior abdominal Marlex mesh rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse had been performed. These patients underwent pre- and post-operative anal manometry. Sixteen of them also underwent colon transit time study before and after the operation. They were followed clinically for a median of 5 months. RESULTS Twenty-two of the 38 patients (58%) with preoperatively defective anal control regained full continence. Resting anal canal pressures improved significantly after surgery in all cases (P=0.001), including those who regained full continence (P=0.005). The change in continence in all patients correlated inversely with the preoperative (r=-0.43, P=0.003) and post-operative (r=-0.40, P=0.005) resting anal pressures. The change in resting anal pressures after surgery was significantly better in patients under 40 years of age (mean 19 cmH2 O) than in those 40 years or older (mean 4 cmH2 O) (P=0.01). All four preoperatively incontinent patients regained full continence in the younger group as opposed to only 50% (17/34) in the older group. Colon transit time normalized in three of the four patients with preoperatively slow transit time and five patients with preoperatively normal transit time developed slow transit. CONCLUSION Internal sphincter pressures do improve after mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse, and the change also correlates with the improvement in continence. Internal sphincter function and continence recover better in younger patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aitola
- Department of Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, and Medical School, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
41
|
Aitola PT, Hiltunen KM, Matikainen MJ. Functional results of operative treatment of rectal prolapse over an 11-year period: emphasis on transabdominal approach. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42:655-60. [PMID: 10344689 DOI: 10.1007/bf02234145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE A variety of surgical procedures have been developed to treat rectal prolapse, but there is still no consensus on the operation of choice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional results of operative treatment of rectal prolapse during an 11-year period in our department. METHODS All patients treated for complete rectal prolapse during an 11-year period, from 1985 to 1995, in a single university hospital were included. Of the 123 patients, 22 were men, and the mean age was 59 (range, 15-88) years. The medical records of all patients were reviewed retrospectively, and a questionnaire on bowel symptoms before and after surgery was sent to all 95 living patients. RESULTS The majority of the procedures (91 percent) were performed by abdominal approach, and the most frequently used open technique was posterior rectopexy with mesh (78 percent). Of the incontinent patients, 35 (63 percent), all those less than 40 years of age and 64 percent of those 40 years or older, were continent postoperatively (P = 0.0001) after a median follow-up of five (range, 1-72) months. According to the questionnaire, after a median follow-up of 85 (range, 16-144) months, only 38 percent of the incontinent patients in the mesh or suture group, 78 percent of patients less than 40 years of age (n = 18), and 52 percent of those 40 years or older (n = 47) claimed to be continent postoperatively. The proportion of patients with constipation was greater after the operation than preoperatively (P = 0.02) and more patients used medication for constipation after than before the operation (P = 0.0001). The overall complication rate was 15 percent, and the mortality rate was 1 percent (1/123). In the mesh or suture group there were 6 (6 percent) recurrent complete prolapses and 11 (12 percent) mucous prolapses. CONCLUSION Posterior rectopexy with mesh gave good results in our hands. Older age and longer follow-up seem to have a negative effect on the functional outcome of the operation and on the recurrence rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P T Aitola
- Department of Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, and Medical School, University of Tampere, Finland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
42
|
Affiliation(s)
- R D Madoff
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
43
|
Silvis R, Gooszen HG, van Essen A, de Kruif AT, Janssen LW. Abdominal rectovaginopexy: modified technique to treat constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42:82-8. [PMID: 10211525 DOI: 10.1007/bf02235188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We noted the combination of obstructed defecation or constipation and fecal incontinence, the poor results of abdominal rectopexy for constipation, and the well-known risk of postoperative induction of constipation after rectopexy. We developed a new operation to treat patients with constipation or fecal incontinence (with a concomitant rectocele, internal rectal intussusception, enterocele at dynamic defecography, or all three) or both. This new rectopexy technique avoided dorsolateral mobilization of the rectum and did not endanger the hypogastric nerves and pelvic autonomic nerves. A better effect on constipation compared with rectopexies with dorsolateral mobilization was expected. METHODS The results of this new operation, which was called rectovaginopexy, were studied prospectively in a series of 27 patients. Four-year results were obtained. Preoperative and postoperative questionnaires, dynamic defecograms, and anorectal physiology studies were analyzed. RESULTS Before the operation 17 patients were constipated, compared with 4 patients one year after rectovaginopexy (76 percent improvement; P = 0.0015) and 5 patients four years after rectovaginopexy (71 percent improvement: P = 0.005), respectively. At one year, fecal incontinence decreased significantly: 15 of 17 patients improved and 9 patients became fully continent (P = 0.0007). Four years after rectovaginopexy the effect on fecal incontinence was no longer significant (P = 0.09). Rectovaginopexy restored anatomy: all (9) enteroceles, all but 1 (17) internal rectal intussusception, and 12 of 20 rectoceles dissolved, and the majority were reduced in size. Rectal sensation for distention was unchanged, and rectal electrosensitivity improved (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS Rectovaginopexy provides significant one-year improvement of both constipation and fecal incontinence. The positive effect on constipation did not deteriorate with time, in contrast to the effect on fecal incontinence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Silvis
- Department of Surgery of the University Hospital Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
44
|
Siproudhis L, Bellissant E, Juguet F, Mendler MH, Allain H, Bretagne JF, Gosselin M. Rectal adaptation to distension in patients with overt rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1998; 85:1527-32. [PMID: 9823917 DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00912.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND High recovery rates of continence are observed after surgical procedures for rectal prolapse. Increases in rectal compliance but no obvious rise in anal pressures have been reported. The authors' hypothesis was that decreased rectal adaptation to distension may contribute to incontinence in patients suffering from overt rectal prolapse. METHODS This was a prospective study conducted in 20 consecutive incontinent patients suffering from overt rectal prolapse with no mucosal change (two men and 18 women; mean(s.e.m.) age 50(3) years). They were compared with 20 age- and sex-matched patients with incontinence without rectal prolapse and ten age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers observed during the same period. The subjects were submitted to phasic isobaric distension of the rectum with an electronic barostat. Anal pressures, perception scores and rectal volumes were recorded at six different preselected pressures. RESULTS Compared with healthy subjects, maximum rectal volumes (mean(s.e.m) 98(6) versus 167(11) ml; P= 0.005), volumes related to compliance (56(5) versus 100(9) ml; P= 0.004) and tone (41(3) versus 67(4) ml; P = 0.003) were decreased significantly in the rectal prolapse group. Prolapse and incontinence groups did not differ significantly with respect to rectal adaptation for all three parameters and steps of distension considered. CONCLUSION Patients suffering from overt rectal prolapse had markedly impaired rectal adaptation to distension which may contribute to incontinence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Siproudhis
- Gastroenterology, Unit, Pointeau du Ronceray, Hôpital Pontchaillou, Rennes, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
45
|
Schultz I, Mellgren A, Nilsson BY, Dolk A, Holmström B. Preoperative electrophysiologic assessment cannot predict continence after rectopexy. Dis Colon Rectum 1998; 41:1392-8. [PMID: 9823805 DOI: 10.1007/bf02237055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate preoperative electrophysiologic assessment for prediction of anal continence after rectopexy. METHODS Forty-three patients with rectal prolapse (n = 26) or internal rectal intussusception (n = 17) underwent concentric-needle electromyography, fiber density determination by single-fiber electromyography of the external anal sphincter, and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency evaluation before Ripstein rectopexy. A detailed history was obtained from each patient preoperatively and postoperatively. RESULTS Anal continence was improved after rectopexy, both in patients with rectal prolapse (P = 0.06) and in those with internal rectal intussusception (P = 0.003). Abnormal results were registered in one or several aspects of the electrophysiologic assessment in 31 (72 percent) of the patients. However, functional outcome with respect to continence was not predicted by preoperative electromyography or pudendal nerve terminal motor latency assessment results. CONCLUSION Electrophysiologic examinations in the preoperative assessment of patients with rectal prolapse and internal rectal intussusception do not predict continence after the Ripstein rectopexy. The routine use of electrophysiologic assessment requires further definition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Schultz
- Department of Surgery, Karolinska Institute at Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
46
|
Eu KW, Seow-Choen F. Functional problems in adult rectal prolapse and controversies in surgical treatment. Br J Surg 1997; 84:904-911. [PMID: 9240128 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800840705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rectal prolapse is a condition that has fascinated surgeons for a long time. To date, no single ideal surgical treatment has been identified. The aetiology of rectal prolapse remains highly controversial, but it is recognized that associated functional problems, such as incontinence and constipation, are common. The pathophysiology, and controversies surrounding continence and constipation, remain topics of debate. METHOD All relevant papers derived from Medline and manual searching on rectal prolapse and associated functional problems were reviewed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION The surgical management of rectal prolapse has evolved from historical encirclement procedures to current minimally invasive ones. Successful management must include adequate attention to the associated functional problems in order to eradicate the basic abnormality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K W Eu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
47
|
Fengler SA, Pearl RK, Prasad ML, Orsay CP, Cintron JR, Hambrick E, Abcarian H. Management of recurrent rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 1997; 40:832-4. [PMID: 9221862 DOI: 10.1007/bf02055442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Many operations have been described for the management of rectal prolapse. Despite an overall recurrence rate of greater than 15 percent, few reviews address how to deal with this problem. This report summarizes our experience with recurrent rectal prolapse and includes suggestions for reoperative management of failed repairs from both abdominal and perineal approaches. PATIENTS AND METHODS Fourteen patients (3 male) ranging in age from 22 to 92 (mean, 68) years underwent operative correction of recurrent rectal prolapse. Average time from initial operation to recurrence was 14 (range, 6-60) months. Initial operations (before recurrence) were as follows: perineal proctectomy and levatorplasty (10), anal encirclement (2), Delorme's procedure (1), and anterior resection (1). Operative procedures performed for recurrence were as follows: perineal proctectomy and levatorplasty (7), sacral rectopexy (abdominal approach; 3), anterior resection with rectopexy (2), Delorme's procedure (1), and anal encirclement (1). Average length of follow-up was 50 (range, 9-115) months. RESULTS No further episodes of complete rectal prolapse were observed during this period. Preoperatively, three patients were noted to be incontinent to the extent that necessitated the use of perineal pads. The reoperative procedures failed to restore fecal continence in any of these three individuals. One patient died in the postoperative period after anal encirclement from an unrelated cause. CONCLUSION Surgical management of recurrent rectal prolapse can be expected to alleviate the prolapse, but not necessarily fecal incontinence. Perineal proctectomies can be safely repeated. Resectional procedures may result in an ischemic segment between two anastomoses, unless the surgeon can resect a previous anastomosis in the repeat procedure. Nonresectional procedures such as the Delorme's procedure should be strongly considered in the management of recurrent rectal prolapse if a resectional procedure was performed initially and failed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S A Fengler
- F. Edward Herbert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Brooke Army Medical Center, Ft. Sam Houston, Texas 78234-6200, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
48
|
Hool GR, Hull TL, Fazio VW. Surgical treatment of recurrent complete rectal prolapse: a thirty-year experience. Dis Colon Rectum 1997; 40:270-2. [PMID: 9118739 DOI: 10.1007/bf02050414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Complete recurrent rectal prolapse (RRP) after initial prolapse surgery is well described. Our aim was to examine the possible causes for RRP, to learn of the operations performed most frequently, and to examine the outcome following recurrence surgery. METHODS Patients with RRP were reviewed retrospectively from 1963 to 1993. RESULTS A total of 24 patients (19 females) had RRP. Of these, 29 operations were performed; three patients had 2 RRP operations, and one patient had 3 RRP operations. Median age was 56 (range, 18-88) years. Median follow-up and median duration to recurrence were 6.75 (range, 0.08-17) years and 2 (range, 0.1-29) years. One patient had RRP at the end of the follow-up period. RRP occurred after 15 abdominal and 9 perineal operations. Treatment for RRP included 25 abdominal and 4 perineal operations. Causes for RRP were identified in 41 percent of cases and was most often attributable to problems with the mesh following the Ripstein procedure. Preoperative incontinence and constipation were largely unchanged by RRP operation. CONCLUSION RRP occurred most commonly because of problems with the mesh, but no etiologic factor was found in the majority of patients. Abdominal operations were performed more frequently than perineal approaches for RRP. Elimination of prolapse can be obtained, but bowel dysfunction still remains in 60 percent of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G R Hool
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio 44195, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
49
|
Abstract
Rectal prolapse remains a disorder for which the cause is not clearly understood and the best method of management is debated. Because the natural history of prolapse frequently leads to complications of incontinence and constipation, we believe that all patients presenting with internal and external prolapse should be considered for repair. Although the type of operative repair recommended may vary, it is clear that all patients with external rectal prolapse should be offered some type of repair. What is not clear from the literature is the appropriate management of those patients with internal prolapse. As shown in the George Washington University experience, surgery is rarely performed for isolated internal prolapse. Most patients who present with internal prolapse also have an associated enterocele, rectocele, or cystocele. Repair of the internal prolapse and the associated disorder may benefit many of these patients. If internal prolapse is an isolated finding, it is not clear to what extent the prolapse is responsible for the patient's symptoms, and repair is generally not advised. These guidelines are easy to enumerate but may be difficult to practice in some patients. Therefore, ongoing evaluation of clinical results is critical to improve our understanding of these disorders. This discussion has outlined the current theories of the cause of rectal prolapse, the symptoms and findings patients present with, and the possible approaches to repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L K Jacobs
- Department of Surgery, George Washington University, Washington, DC USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
50
|
Schultz I, Mellgren A, Dolk A, Johansson C, Holmström B. Continence is improved after the Ripstein rectopexy. Different mechanizms in rectal prolapse and rectal intussusception? Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39:300-6. [PMID: 8603552 DOI: 10.1007/bf02049472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study was undertaken to evaluate anal manometric changes after Ripstein's operation for rectal prolapse and rectal intussusception and to study the clinical outcome following the operation, with special reference to anal incontinence. METHODS Forty-two patients with rectal prolapse or rectal intussusception were subjected to anorectal manometry preoperatively and seven days and six months postoperatively. A detailed history was obtained from each patient preoperatively and six months postoperatively. RESULTS Preoperatively, patients with rectal intussusception had higher maximum resting pressure (MRP) (52+/- 23 mmHg) than patients with rectal prolapse (34 +/- 20 mmHg; P < 0.01). In the group of patients with rectal prolapse, there was a postoperative increase in MRP after six months (P < 0.001) but not after seven days. Maximum squeeze pressure (MSP) did not increase. Neither MRP nor MSP increased postoperatively in patients with internal rectal procidentia. Continence was improved postoperatively both in patients with rectal prolapse (P < 0.01) and rectal intussusception (P < 0.01). There was no postoperative increase in rectal emptying difficulties. CONCLUSION Ripstein's operation often improved anal continence in patients with rectal prolapse and rectal intussusception. This improvement was accompanied by increased MRP in patients with rectal prolapse, indicating recovery of internal anal sphincter function. No postoperative increase in MRP was found in patinets with rectal intussusception. This suggests an alternate mechanism of improvement in patients with rectal intussusception.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Schultz
- Department of Surgery, Karolinska Institutet at Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|