Early prediction of the prognosis of viral-related cirrhosis patients after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is beneficial for clinical decision-making. The aim of this study is to explore a comprehensive prognostic assessment model for evaluating the survival outcomes of patients post-TIPS.

A total of 155 patients treated with TIPS were included in the study. The data were collected from electronic records. The nutritional status of the patient is evaluated using imaging examinations measuring by the axial CT images from the L3 vertebral level. The primary endpoint was set as death within 1 year after TIPS. Multivariate Cox regression was performed to determine the factors associated with mortality.

The Cox regression analysis revealed that the lower PMFI was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality after TIPS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.159, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.063-1.263, p = 0.001). Furthermore, subgroup analyses according to gender revealed the PMFI was associated with postoperative death both in male (HR 2.125, 95% CI, 1.147-3.936, p = 0.017) and female patients (HR 1.070, 95% CI, 1.001-1.144, p = 0.047). The area under the curve (AUC) for predicting death within 1 year was 0.807. The clinical impact curve analysis showed that PMFI had higher levels of risk threshold probability and a smaller gap between actual and predicted curves.

In viral-related cirrhosis patients with portal hypertension, increased muscle fat content might be a potential prognostic marker and associated with postoperative death after TIPS.

While TIPS is traditionally considered a bridge to liver transplant (LT), some patients achieve long-term transplant-free survival (TFS) with TIPS alone. Prognosis and need for LT should not only be assessed at time of procedure, but also re-evaluated in patients with favorable early outcomes.

Adult recipients of TIPS in the multicenter advancing liver therapeutic approaches retrospective cohort study were included (N=1127 patients; 2040 person-years follow-up). Adjusted competing risk regressions were used to assess factors associated with long-term post-TIPS clinical outcomes at the time of procedure and 6 months post-TIPS. MELD-Na at TIPS was significantly associated with post-TIPS mortality (subdistribution hazards ratio of death 1.1 [ p =0.42], 1.3 [ p =0.04], and 1.7 [ p <0.01] for MELD-Na 15-19, 20-24, and ≥25 relative to MELD-Na <15, respectively). MELD 3.0 was also associated with post-TIPS outcomes. Among the 694 (62%) patients who achieved early (6 mo) post-TIPS TFS, rates of long-term TFS were 88% at 1 year and 57% at 3 years post-TIPS. Additionally, a within-individual increase in MELD-Na score of >3 points from TIPS to 6 months post-TIPS was significantly associated with long-term mortality, regardless of initial MELD-Na score (subdistribution hazards ratio of death 1.8, p <0.01). For patients with long-term post-TIPS TFS, rates of complications of the TIPS or portal hypertension were low.

Among patients with early post-TIPS TFS, prognosis and need for LT should be reassessed, informed by postprocedure changes in MELD-Na and clinical status. For selected patients, "destination TIPS" without LT may offer long-term survival with freedom from portal hypertensive complications.

Liver transplantation is the definitive treatment for advanced liver cirrhosis with portal hypertension. In Japan, the scarcity of deceased donors leads to reliance on living donors, often resulting in smaller grafts. Managing portal venous pressure (PVP) is critical to prevent fatal posttransplant complications. This study explored the possibility of predicting intraoperative PVP. We analyzed 475 living donor liver transplant cases from 2006 to 2023, excluding those with acute liver failure or prior splenectomy or splenic artery embolization. Patients were divided into a training group (n = 425) and a test group (n = 50). We evaluated the correlation between preoperative factors and PVP at laparotomy to predict PVP at laparotomy and closure. The predictive model was validated with the test group data. PVP at laparotomy could be predicted using correlated preoperative factors: prothrombin time ( p < 0.001), predicted splenic volume ( p < 0.001), and presence of a portosystemic shunt ( p = 0.002), as follows: predicted PVP at laparotomy (mm Hg)=25.818 - 0.077 × (prothrombin time [%]) + 0.004 × (predicted splenic volume [mL]) - 2.067 × (1: with a portosystemic shunt) ( p < 0.001; R = 0.346). In addition, PVP at closure could be predicted using correlated operative factors, including measured PVP at laparotomy, as follows: predicted PVP at closure (mm Hg)=14.268 + 0.149 × (measured PVP at laparotomy [mm Hg]) - 0.040 × (GV/SLV [%]) - 0.862 × (1: splenectomy [if yes]) - 3.511 × (1: splenic artery ligation without splenectomy [if yes]) ( p < 0.001; R = 0.339). This study demonstrated the feasibility of predicting intraoperative PVP using preoperative factors in patients with decompensated cirrhosis undergoing liver transplant. This predictive approach could refine surgical planning, potentially improving patient outcomes.

This study assesses the efficacy and safety of Portal Vein Recanalization with Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (PVR-TIPS) in non-cirrhotic patients with chronic portal vein occlusion (CPVO), cavernomatous transformation, and symptomatic portal hypertension (PH) and/or portal vein thrombotic progression.

Medical records of 21 non-cirrhotic patients with CPVO and portal cavernoma undergoing PVR-TIPS were analyzed. Hemodynamic (intraprocedural reduction in portosystemic pressure gradient), clinical (data on gastrointestinal bleeding, abdominal pain, ascites, and presence of esophageal varices from imaging exams) and technical success (PVR-TIPS) assessed efficacy. Safety was determined through complications classified according to the CIRSE Classification System.

PVR-TIPS was successfully performed in all patients, resulting in a significant reduction in portal pressure gradient by 10 mmHg (21.475 ± 9.7 mmHg - 11.454 ± 5,4 mmHg, p < 0.001), alleviating portal hypertension symptoms without thrombotic progression. Clinical success included resolution or reduction of ascites (p = 0.016), gastroesophageal varices (p = 0.004), abdominal pain (p = 0.0021), and cessation of gastrointestinal bleeding (p = 0.021). Complications occurred in 33% of patients, including six grade III events (1 perioperative liver bleeding, 5 delayed stent occlusions) and one grade VI event resulting in death (4.8%). Primary patency rate was 76% (21.3 months, range:0.2-82), secondary patency 100% (4 months, range:3.8-40.8). Survival at follow-up was 90.4%, with one unrelated death. One patient underwent liver transplantation, three became eligible post-recanalization.

PVR-TIPS proves effective and safe in reducing portal pressure gradient, thereby alleviating PH symptoms without evidence of portal thrombosis progression in non-cirrhotic patients with CPVO and portal cavernoma. It expands therapeutic options, including liver transplantation.

Hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS) is a serious pulmonary vascular complication that causes arterial hypoxemia in the setting of liver disease. HPS has a progressive course and is associated with a two-fold increased risk of mortality relative to cirrhotic patients without HPS. It primarily affects patients with portal hypertension. The key pathological features of HPS include intrapulmonary angiogenesis and vascular dilations (IPVDs). The prevalence of HPS varies widely due to inconsistent diagnostic criteria and a lack of standardized protocols. Despite advances in understanding its pathophysiology, no effective curative treatments for HPS exist. Liver transplantation remains the only definitive treatment, improving survival and altering the disease natural course. This review explores the pathophysiology, clinical features, and therapeutic strategies for HPS, highlighting recent advances in the literature.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPSS) is highly effective for treatment of variceal bleeding; however, factors contributing to rebleeding complications remain unclear.

In this study, we aim to determine risk factors for recurrent portal hypertensive gastrointestinal bleeding following TIPSS.

Utilising the Advancing Liver Therapeutic Approaches multicentre database, we retrospectively identified adult patients who underwent TIPSS for secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding and had a gastrointestinal rebleeding event within 1 year. We developed multivariable logistic regression models to identify clinical/procedural characteristics associated with rebleeding.

We identified 476 patients, predominately middle-aged (mean age 57), male (62%) and White (65%), with mean MELD-Na 16. 16% (n = 77) had a rebleeding event; these patients were more likely to be male (p = 0.016), with higher serum creatinine (p = 0.005), MELD-Na (p = 0.0002), portal hypertensive gastropathy on pre-TIPSS upper endoscopy (p = 0.000) and with higher incidence of TIPSS revision (p = 0.000). There were no significant differences in type of TIPSS endoprosthesis, concurrent embolotherapy, and post-TIPSS pressure gradients between those who experienced rebleeding and those who did not. After adjusting for TIPSS revision, multivariable analysis revealed MELD-Na and presence of portal hypertensive gastropathy on pre-TIPSS endoscopy were independently associated with rebleeding.

In this retrospective analysis of a multicentre, nationally representative database, we found that apart from TIPSS-related factors, high MELD-Na and portal hypertensive gastropathy on pre-TIPSS endoscopy were independent predictors of rebleeding within 1 year following TIPSS. These variables may be used to identify high-risk patients who may require additional monitoring following TIPSS.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a widely used surgery for portal hypertensive patients, whose potential postoperative complications are closely related to the hemodynamic condition of the portal venous system. The selection of shunt position in the surgery may affect the postoperative hemodynamics; however, it is difficult for clinical studies to investigate the influence. Therefore, this study aims to employ the computational model simulating TIPS to compare the hemodynamic differences resulting from different shunt positions, and also to investigate the influences of different geometrical model simplification strategies used in the TIPS simulation. For this purpose, the clinical data of two representative patients were retrospectively collected, based on which, the computational hemodynamic models of the portal venous systems after TIPS were constructed, incorporating three typical shunt positions (i.e. shunt at the left/main/right portal vein) and three types of geometrical model simplification. Results showed that among the models with different shunt positions, the area-averaged flow velocity magnitudes in the shunts were very similar, while the model with shunt at the main portal vein showed the lowest postoperative portal pressure and the smallest area of high wall shear stress near the portal venous bifurcation. Among the models using different geometrical model simplification strategies, the simulated blood pressures at the main portal veins were very similar, but showed marked differences near the shunt inlets. Moreover, the area-averaged flow velocity magnitudes in the shunts were almost the same, while the velocity distributions differed a lot, leading to the different spatial distributions of wall shear stress near the portal venous bifurcations and shunt walls. These results on one hand suggested that placing the shunt at the main portal vein is more beneficial for the patient; on the other hand, they proved the feasibility of utilizing simplified model to save computational cost without losing the accuracy when the pressure at the main portal vein is mainly focused on. These findings would assist clinical decision-making and promote more accurate and efficient TIPS simulations.

Proposed in the early 1980s as a solution for managing complications of portal hypertension, the percutaneous creation of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt has consistently gained a central role. Increasingly lower complication rates have been observed thanks to improvements in both technologies and the skills of interventional radiologists.

This document is aimed at interventional radiologists and provides best practice recommendations for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation, describing patient selection, intraprocedural management and follow-up, in addition to recommendations in paediatric settings.

The CIRSE Standards of Practice Committee established a writing group consisting of seven European clinicians with recognised expertise in the creation of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. The writing group reviewed the existing literature performing a pragmatic evidence search using PubMed to select relevant publications in the English language and involving human subjects, preferably published from 2009 to 2024. The final recommendations were developed by consensus.

TIPS creation has an established role in the successful management of portal hypertension and its complications. This Standards of Practice document provides up-to-date recommendations for patient selection, materials, its safe performance, and follow-up with complications management.

It is more than 50 years since the concept of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) was first introduced as a percutaneous procedure for patients with refractory variceal bleeding and ascites. TIPS has become widely accepted in the management of complications of portal hypertension because it is less invasive than surgery. In the early days of TIPS, complications included the poor long-term patency of the stent and a high incidence of hepatic encephalopathy. In addition, an excessive shunt diameter after TIPS often resulted in severe hepatic encephalopathy. Although recent covered stents have significantly reduced shunt dysfunction, the development of hepatic encephalopathy and early liver failure remain to be crucial post-TIPS complications. This study reviews the current literature on the status of TIPS in the treatment of cirrhosis.

For cirrhotic refractory ascites, diuretics combined with albumin and vasoactive drugs are the first-line choice for ascites management. However, their therapeutic effects are limited, and most refractory ascites do not respond to medication treatment, necessitating consideration of drainage or surgical interventions. Consequently, numerous drainage methods for cirrhotic ascites have emerged, including large-volume paracentesis, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, peritoneovenous shunt, automated low-flow ascites pump, cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy, and peritoneal catheter drainage. This review introduces the advantages and disadvantages of these methods in different aspects, as well as indications and contraindications for this disease.

Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome/veno-occlusive disease (SOS/VOD) is a life-threatening complication after both autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, its characterization after haploidentical HSCT (haplo-HSCT) with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) is scarce. This study aimed to describe characteristics and outcomes of patients with SOS/VOD after haplo-HSCT with PT-Cy. We conducted a retrospective study of 797 patients undergoing a haplo-HSCT with PT-Cy between 2007 and 2019 in 9 centers in Spain. SOS/VOD was defined according to modified Seattle, Baltimore, or revised European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) criteria. Severity was graded retrospectively according to revised EBMT severity criteria into 4 categories: mild, moderate, severe, and very severe. From a total of 797 haplo-HSCTs performed, 46 patients (5.77%) were diagnosed with SOS/VOD at a median of 19 days (range, 4 to 84 days) after transplantation. Based on revised EBMT severity criteria, the SOS/VOD cases were classified as mild (n = 4; 8.7%), moderate (n = 10; 21.7%), severe (n = 12; 26.1%), and very severe (n = 20; 43.5%). Overall, 30 patients (65%) achieved SOS/VOD complete response, 25 (83%) of whom were treated with defibrotide. Twenty patients (43%) died before day +100 post-HSCT. Death was attributed to SOS/VOD in 11 patients, and 5 patients died of other causes without resolution of SOS/VOD. The incidence of SOS/VOD after haplo-HSCT with PT-Cy was comparable to those reported after HLA-identical HSCT series. Most of the patients developed very severe SOS/VOD according to revised EBMT severity criteria. Despite a promising SOS/VOD complete response (CR) rate (65%), 100-day mortality remained high (43%), indicating that further improvement in the management of this potentially fatal complication is needed.

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) after Trans-jugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a common clinical problem. According to recent studies, Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use can serve as an independent risk factor for HE. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to analyze the association between HE with PPI use versus without PPI use in patients undergoing TIPS.

We conducted a comprehensive literature search from inception through February 15th, 2022 on MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science databases. Odds ratio (OR) was calculated when comparing dichotomous variables of patients with HE vs. no HE in PPI use versus no PPI use in post TIPS patients. A 95% confidence interval (CI) and P values (<0.05 considered significant) were also generated.

The search strategy yielded a total of 27 articles. We finalized four studies with a total of 825 patients. There was statistically significant difference in TIPS patients with HE in PPI users versus non-PPI users (OR 3.39 [1.79-6.43], P<0.01, I2=55.5%). Pooled mean average days to hospitalization was 215.2 days to hospitalization for hepatic encephalopathy in non-PPI users compared to 139.5 days in PPI users.

Our study determines that there is a higher risk of post-TIPS HE in patients on PPI therapy vs. patients not receiving PPI therapy. We recommend using PPIs at a lower tolerable dose where necessary. Larger studies are needed to draw stronger conclusions.

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the performance of different risk assessment models (RAMs) for survival after Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) in patients with cirrhotic portal hypertension.

A systematic search of PubMed, WOS, Embase, Cochrane, and CNKI from inception to February 2023 was conducted. We comprehensively reviewed and aggregated data from numerous studies covering prevalent RAMs such as Child-Turcotte-Pugh, the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD), MELD-Sodium (MELD-Na), the Freiburg Index of Post-TIPS Survival (FIPS), Bilirubin-platelet, Chronic Liver Failure Consortium Acute Decompensation score, and Albumin-Bilirubin grade across different timeframes. For this study, short-term is defined as outcomes within a year while long-term refers to outcomes beyond one year. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve or Concordance Statistics was chosen as the metric to assess predictive capacity for mortality outcomes across six predetermined time intervals. Mean effect sizes at various time points were determined using robust variance estimation.

MELD consistently stood out as a primary short-term survival predictor, particularly for 1 month (± 2 weeks) (AUC: 0.72) and 3 months of (± 1 month) survival (AUC: 0.72). MELD-Na showed the best long-term predictive ability, with an AUC of 0.70 at 3.5 years (± 1.5 years). FIPS performed well for 6 months of (± 2 months) survival (AUC: 0.68) and overall transplant-free survival (AUC: 0.75). Efficacy nuances were observed in RAMs when applied to particular subgroups. Meta-regression emphasized the potential predictor overlaps in models like MELD and FIPS.

This meta-analysis underscores the MELD score as the premier predictor for short-term survival following TIPS. Meanwhile, the FIPS score and MELD-Na model exhibit potential in forecasting long-term outcomes. The study accentuates the significance of RAM selection for enhancing patient outcomes and advocates for additional research to corroborate these findings and fine-tune risk assessment in TIPS.

Hepatic recompensation is firstly described in the Baveno VII criteria, which requires the fulfillment of strict criteria. First, a primary cause of cirrhosis must be addressed, suppressed, or cured. Second, complications of liver cirrhosis, including ascites, encephalopathy, and variceal hemorrhage, must disappear without any intervention. Finally, liver function indicators must be improved. Moreover, without addressing/suppressing/curing cirrhosis and improvement in liver synthetic function, complications, including ascites and variceal hemorrhage can be improved by a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), which is not evidence of hepatic recompensation. Therefore, on the basis of the definition of hepatic recompensation, TIPS does not achieve hepatic recompensation.

To evaluate the role of radiomics in preoperative outcome prediction in cirrhotic patients who underwent transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) using "controlled expansion covered stents".

This retrospective institutional review board-approved study included cirrhotic patients undergoing TIPS with controlled expansion covered stent placement. From preoperative CT images, the whole liver was segmented into Volumes of Interest (VOIs) at the unenhanced and portal venous phase. Radiomics features were extracted, collected, and analyzed. Subsequently, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn to assess which features could predict patients' outcomes. The endpoints studied were 6-month overall survival (OS), development of hepatic encephalopathy (HE), grade II or higher HE according to West Haven Criteria, and clinical response, defined as the absence of rebleeding or ascites. A radiomic model for outcome prediction was then designed.

A total of 76 consecutive cirrhotic patients undergoing TIPS creation were enrolled. The highest performances in terms of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) were observed for the "clinical response" and "survival at 6 months" outcome with 0.755 and 0.767, at the unenhanced and portal venous phase, respectively. Specifically, on basal scans, accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity were 66.42%, 63.93%, and 73.75%, respectively. At the portal venous phase, an accuracy of 65.34%, a specificity of 62.38%, and a sensitivity of 74.00% were demonstrated.

A pre-interventional machine learning-based CT radiomics algorithm could be useful in predicting survival and clinical response after TIPS creation in cirrhotic patients.

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a clinically severe and devastating complication of decompensated liver disease affecting mortality, quality of life for patients and families, hospital admission rates, and overall health-care costs globally. Depending on the cause of HE, several medical treatment options have been developed and become available. In some refractory HE, such as spontaneous portosystemic shunt-related HE (SPSS-HE) or posttransjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt HE (post-TIPS HE), advanced interventional radiology (IR) procedures have been used, and shown to be effective in these conditions. This review presents 2 effective IR procedures for managing SPSS-HE and post-TIPS HE.

For over 60 years, diagnostic and interventional radiology have been heavily involved in the evaluation and treatment of patients presenting with gastrointestinal bleeding. For patients who present with upper GI bleeding and have a contraindication to endoscopy or have an unsuccessful attempt at endoscopy for identifying or controlling the bleeding, interventional radiology is often consulted for evaluation and consideration of catheter-based intervention.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a minimally invasive therapeutic option to treat the sequelae of portal hypertension. It is unclear whether current international recommendations are reflected in current clinical practice across Australia and the extent of variations in care. This study aimed to address this gap in knowledge and benchmark the current landscape of TIPS services in Australia against international guidelines.

We designed a 42-item questionnaire according to practice-based recommendations and standards of international guidelines to investigate current landscape of TIPS service across four key domains: (1) service provision, (2) patient selection and indications, (3) best procedure practice, and (4) postoperative care.

Gastroenterologist/hepatologists from 23 major liver centres (67.6%) across Australia currently performing TIPS completed the questionnaire. Between 2017 and 2020, there were 456 elective TIPS insertions. Units offering TIPS service had a low median number of TIPS insertions (n=7 per annum). More than half of respondents (56.5%) did not have institutional clinical practice protocols. There was marked variation in practices across institutions in terms of TIPS indications and patient selection. Despite variations, the success rate of elective TIPS was high at 91.7% (79-100%), with 86.6% (29-100%) for rescue TIPS. There was significant variation in postoperative follow-up and care.

Current TIPS practice in Australia varies significantly across institutions. There is a need for a national consensus clinical practice guidelines to improve access and minimise unwarranted variation. A national registry for TIPS could measure, monitor, and report on quality of clinical care and patient outcomes.

A parallel shunt (PS) is often necessary to regain portal decompression in a dysfunctional transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). Here, we successfully utilized the gun-sight technique to create a PS. An 81-year-old male with decompensated NASH cirrhosis and recent TIPS placement presents with recurrent ascites and pleural effusions in the setting of a persistent portosystemic gradient. Due to a lack of access to endovascular ultrasound and complex patient anatomy, a gun-site technique was approached to create a PS (left portal vein [PV] to left hepatic vein [HV]). After the right HV and existing TIPS were accessed via the right internal jugular vein access, the left HV was accessed. Following a left portal venogram, 10 mm snares were placed into the left HV and the left PV. An 18-gauge needle was then fluoroscopically placed through and through both snares. A 0.035 Glidewire was snared with the help of both snares, establishing access from the left HV via the left PV to the right PV. After serial dilation, a roadrunner wire and catheter were placed into the main PV and superior mesenteric vein, followed by stent dilation. Post-TIPS portal venogram showed prompt flow of contrast from the main PV to the right atrium without any stenosis through both TIPS stents in the left and right PVs. Initial and postprocedural TIPS gradients were 24 mm Hg and 6 mm Hg, respectively. Gun-site technique is a valuable technique in creating a parallel TIPS shunt.

The association between the presence of sarcopenia in patients with cirrhosis and the onset of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is yet to be established. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to provide a thorough summary of the available evidence on this association.

A thorough search of the literature was performed in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases. The protocol was duly registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023398856). The hazard ratio (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the occurrence of HE after TIPS were extracted from studies comparing cirrhotic patients with and without sarcopenia. These data were then combined using a random-effect model.

A total of 1135 patients from seven cohort studies that met our eligibility criteria were included in the meta-analysis. Our findings indicate a significantly higher risk of post-TIPS HE among cirrhotic patients with sarcopenia compared to those without sarcopenia (HR, 2.35; 95% CIs 1.32-4.19; p = 0.004; I2 = 75%). The findings remained consistent across subgroups stratified by liver disease etiology, study location, and severity of hepatic dysfunction.

The study demonstrated that sarcopenia was strongly linked to an increased likelihood post-TIPS HE among cirrhotic patients.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) relieves cirrhotic complications by reducing portacaval pressure gradient (PCG), but it lacks precision in achieving a targeted post-TIPS PCG simply through diameter adjustment of equal diameter stents. This study aimed to present a controlled-expansion, streamlined, and covered tapered stent, and examined its effects on pressure reduction compared with equal- diameter stents. Twenty-four patients who underwent standardized 8-mm stent TIPS implantation at West China Hospital from December 2017 to February 2021 were included in the current study. Virtual equal-diameter stent graft with different diameter and streamlined tapered stents were created in the post-TIPS 3-dimentional models reconstructed based on computed tomography angiography data. The numerical simulation showed that only two patients achieved targeted post-TIPS PCG consistent with the clinical invasive measurement. When 6-mm and 10-mm equal-diameter stents were employed, simulated post-TIPS PCGs for most patients remained outside the safe range, and recirculating flow was observed at the stent-portal vein anastomosis. In contrast, the use of the new streamlined taper stent resulted in post-TIPS PCGs within the 10-12 mmHg range for 17 out of 24 patients, with no recirculating flow observed at the anastomotic sites. In conclusion, the streamlined tapered stent could pose an effective solution to the problem that the big jump depressurization between two different equal-diameter stents and it would improve the hemodynamics in the region near the PV-stent anchorage. Therefore, the streamlined tapered stent may present a superior alternative for TIPS procedure.

In adults with medically refractory sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has been used successfully to improve portal hypertension and symptoms such as ascites. There is limited data on the use of TIPS for SOS in pediatric patients.

The index case was reviewed retrospectively. PubMed and Medline databases were searched to identify other cases.

A 4-year-old male with high-risk neuroblastoma, developed SOS after tandem autologous stem cell transplant. He was medically managed with defibrotide, diuretics, and peritoneal drainage, but, due to refractoriness, he underwent TIPS day +54 following bone marrow transplant. Hepatic venous pressure gradient improved from 17 to 8 mm Hg following TIPS placement with significant improvement in the patient's clinical status and ascites. However, 15 months later, his shunt remained patent, and he remains clinically well with stable liver enzymes. A literature review identified 13 pediatric cases of TIPS for SOS due to varied causes. TIPS caused a median hepatic venous pressure gradient of 9 mmHg (range, 2-38 mm Hg). The mortality following the procedure was 15%, with 2 cases who died at 2- and 11-days post-TIPS. At the time of the last follow-up (range 8-25 months), 5 patients were alive, and 8 were lost to follow-up.

We present here a pediatric case of SOS due to stem cell transplant treated successfully with TIPS with a review of the literature. A timely, individualized application of TIPS can be effective in treating children with medication-refractory SOS.

This review summarizes the current and emerging indications, contraindications, and evaluation for TIPS. In the last three decades of use, there have been substantial changes and progress in this field, including the use of controlled-expansion, covered stents, which has broadened the clinical uses of TIPS.

Recent findings have rapidly expanded the indications for TIPS, including emerging uses in hepatorenal syndrome, hepatopulmonary syndrome and before abdominal surgery. The widespread use of controlled-expansion, covered stents has decreased rates of post-TIPS hepatic encephalopathy, opening TIPS to a larger patient population. Overall, with newer stent technology and more research in this area, the clinical utility and potential of TIPS has rapidly expanded. Going forward, a renewed focus on randomized-control trials and long-term outcomes will be a crucial element to selecting appropriate TIPS recipients and recommending emerging indications for this procedure.

Respiratory symptoms and hypoxemia can complicate chronic liver disease and portal hypertension. Various pulmonary disorders affecting the pleura, lung parenchyma, and pulmonary vasculature are seen in end-stage liver disease, complicating liver transplantation (LT). Approximately 8% of cirrhotic patients in an intensive care unit develop severe pulmonary problems. These disorders affect waiting list mortality and posttransplant outcomes. A thorough history, physical examination, and appropriate laboratory tests help diagnose and assess the severity to risk stratify pulmonary diseases before LT. Hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS), portopulmonary hypertension (POPH), and hepatic hydrothorax (HH) are respiratory consequences specific to cirrhosis and portal hypertension. HPS is seen in 5-30% of cirrhosis cases and is characterized by impaired oxygenation due to intrapulmonary vascular dilatations and arteriovenous shunts. Severe HPS is an indication of LT. The majority of patients with HPS resolve their hypoxemia after LT. When pulmonary arterial hypertension occurs in patients with portal hypertension, it is called POPH. All other causes of pulmonary arterial hypertension should be ruled out before labeling as POPH. Since severe POPH (mean pulmonary artery pressure [mPAP] >50 mm Hg) is a relative contraindication for LT, it is crucial to screen for POPH before LT. Those with moderate POPH (mPAP >35 mm Hg), who improve with medical therapy, will benefit from LT. A transudative pleural effusion called hepatic hydrothorax (HH) is seen in 5-10% of people with cirrhosis. Refractory cases of HH benefit from LT. In recent years, increasing clinical expertise and advances in the medical field have resulted in better outcomes in patients with moderate to severe pulmonary disorders, who undergo LT.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a widely used procedure for management of uncontrolled upper gastrointestinal bleeding and refractory ascites in people with liver cirrhosis. However, nearly half of the people experience shunt dysfunction and recurrent symptoms within one year of the procedure. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE)-covered stents are assumed to decrease shunt dysfunction by approximately 20% to 30%.

To evaluate the benefits and harms associated with the use of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE)-covered stents versus bare stents in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPSs) for managing people with liver cirrhosis.

We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was 28 February 2023.

Randomised clinical trials comparing ePTFE-covered stents versus bare stents in TIPS for treatment of people with liver cirrhosis.

We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were 1. all-cause mortality, 2. procedure-related complications, and 3. health-related quality of life. Our secondary outcomes were 4. upper gastrointestinal bleeding, 5. recurrence of ascites, 6. hepatic encephalopathy, 7. kidney failure, 8. early thrombosis, 9. non-serious adverse events, and 10. shunt dysfunction. We used GRADE to assess certainty of evidence. We analysed outcome data at the maximum follow-up, except for the 'early thrombosis' outcome for which it was within 12 weeks after the TIPS procedure.

We included four trials with 565 randomised participants (age range: 18 to 75 years; male range: 63.6% to 75.0%). A total of 527 participants provided data for analyses because of losses to follow-up. Two trials were conducted in China; one in France; and one in France, Spain, and Canada. Participants were classified with cirrhosis Child-Pugh class A, B, or C, and for some, the class was not reported. We used intention-to-treat principle (four trials) and per-protocol analysis (one trial) to meta-analyse the data. One trial compared ePTFE-covered stents versus bare stents of the same diameter and three trials compared ePTFE-covered stents versus stents of different diameters. ePTFE-covered stents versus bare stents of the same diameter One trial with 258 participants compared 8 mm covered stent versus 8 mm bare stent. Mortality in the covered stent group is possibly lower than in the bare stent group (risk ratio (RR) 0.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43 to 0.92; low-certainty evidence). Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.84), recurrence of ascites (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.87), and shunt dysfunction (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.61) occurred more often in the bare stent group than in the covered stent group (all low-certainty evidence). There was no difference in hepatic encephalopathy between groups (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.61; very low-certainty evidence). The trial did not report data on procedure-related complications, health-related quality of life, early thrombosis, and segmental liver ischaemia (a non-serious adverse event). ePTFE-covered stents versus bare stents of different stent diameters Three trials compared ePTFE-covered stents versus bare stents of different diameters (10.5 (standard deviation (SD) 0.9) mm versus 11.7 (SD 0.8) mm; 8 mm versus 10 mm; and one trial used 10-mm stents that could be dilated from 8 mm to 10 mm). There was no evidence of a difference between the ePTFE-covered stents versus bare stents groups in mortality (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.16; 3 trials, 269 participants), procedure-related complications (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.05 to 5.57; 1 trial, 80 participants), upper gastrointestinal bleeding (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.15 to 1.38; 3 trials, 269 participants), hepatic encephalopathy (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.30; 3 trials, 269 participants), and kidney failure (RR 7.59, 95% CI 0.40 to 143.92; 1 trial, 121 participants) (all very low-certainty evidence). Recurrence of ascites (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.85; 3 trials, 269 participants; low-certainty evidence), shunt dysfunction (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.92; 3 trials, 269 participants; low-certainty evidence), and early thrombosis (RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.82; I2 = 0%; 3 trials, 261 participants; very low-certainty evidence) occurred more often in the bare stents group. There was no evidence of a difference in segmental liver ischaemia (RR 5.25, 95% CI 0.26 to 106.01; 1 trial, 80 participants; very low-certainty evidence). No trial presented data on health-related quality of life. Funding One trial did not clearly report funding sources. The remaining three trials declared that they had no funding with vested interests.

Based on the small number of trials with insufficient sample size and events, and study limitations, we assessed the overall certainty of evidence in the predefined outcomes as low or very low. Therefore, we are uncertain which of the two interventions (ePTFE-covered stents or bare stents of the same diameter and ePTFE-covered stents versus bare stents of different stent diameters) is effective for the evaluated outcomes. None of the four trials reported data on health-related quality of life, and data on complications were either missing or rarely reported. We lack high-quality trials to evaluate the role of ePTFE-covered stents for TIPS for managing people with liver cirrhosis.

Use of a covered stent after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) was compared to PTA alone for treatment of upper extremity hemodialysis patients with arteriovenous fistula (AVF) stenoses. Patients with AVF stenosis of 50% or more and evidence of AVF dysfunction underwent treatment with PTA followed by randomization of 142 patients to include a covered stent or 138 patients with PTA alone. Primary outcomes were 30-day safety, powered for noninferiority, and six-month target lesion primary patency (TLPP), powered to test whether TLPP after covered-stent placement was superior to PTA alone. Twelve-month TLPP and six-month access circuit primary patency (ACPP) were also hypothesis tested while additional clinical outcomes were observed through two years. Safety was significantly non-inferior while six- and 12-month TLPP were each superior for the covered stent group compared to PTA alone (six months: 78.7% versus 55.8%; 12 months: 47.9% versus 21.2%, respectively). ACPP was not statistically different between groups at six-months. Observed differences at 24 months favored the covered-stent group: 28.4% better TLPP, fewer target-lesion reinterventions (1.6 ± 1.6 versus 2.8 ± 2.0), and a longer mean time between target-lesion reinterventions (380.4 ± 249.5 versus 217.6 ± 158.4 days). Thus, our multicenter, prospective, randomized study of a covered stent used to treat AVF stenosis demonstrated noninferior safety with better TLPP and fewer target-lesion reinterventions than PTA alone through 24 months.

Although non-target puncture (NPT)-related complications are well known to clinicians performing TIPS, there is no NTP-focused study to assess the true clinical sequalae of NTP-related complications. In this study, the aim was to evaluate the incidence, safety, clinical outcomes and complications related to NTPs during the portal access of TIPS procedures.

A retrospective review of 369 TIPS procedures from October 2007 to September 2019 was performed. We identified inadvertent NTPs, including biliary, hepatic artery, lymphatic and capsular punctures. Next, the medical records and images were reviewed and analyzed to assess the safety and clinical outcomes of these cohorts.

A total of 71 NTPs were identified in 56 patients (15.18% of 369 patients). Of 369 TIPS patients, there were (1) 28 biliary punctures (7.6%), (2) 16 extracapsular punctures (4.3%), (3) 15 lymphatic punctures (4.1%) and (4) 12 hepatic artery punctures (3.3%). The overall complication rate was 2.2% (8/369). Based on the Clavien-Dindo classification, three patients (0.8%) had a minor complication. In addition, five patients (1.4%) experienced grade II-V major complications, such as symptomatic hemoperitoneum, arterio-biliary fistula or hemorrhagic shock leading to death. Mortality (0.5%) was only caused by extracapsular puncture combined with other NTP.

NTPs during the portal access of TIPS procedures are associated with low complication risk. However, when extracapsular punctures are combined with other NTPs, a more severe complication, including mortality, can occur. Nevertheless, all patients with NTP should be closely monitored at a higher level of care after TIPS placement.

Single-center studies in patients undergoing TIPS suggest that elevated right atrial pressure (RAP) may influence survival. We assessed the impact of pre-TIPS RAP on outcomes using the Advancing Liver Therapeutic Approaches (ALTA) database.

Total 883 patients in ALTA multicenter TIPS database from 2010 to 2015 from 9 centers with measured pre-TIPS RAP were included. Primary outcome was mortality. Secondary outcomes were 48-hour post-TIPS complications, post-TIPS portal hypertension complications, and post-TIPS inpatient admission for heart failure. Adjusted Cox Proportional hazards and competing risk model with liver transplant as a competing risk were used to assess RAP association with mortality. Restricted cubic splines were used to model nonlinear relationship. Logistic regression was used to assess RAP association with secondary outcomes.Pre-TIPS RAP was independently associated with overall mortality (subdistribution HR: 1.04 per mm Hg, 95% CI, 1.01, 1.08, p =0.009) and composite 48-hour complications. RAP was a predictor of TIPS dysfunction with increased odds of post-90-day paracentesis in outpatient TIPS, hospital admissions for renal dysfunction, and heart failure. Pre-TIPS RAP was positively associated with model for end-stage liver disease, body mass index, Native American and Black race, and lower platelets.

Pre-TIPS RAP is an independent risk factor for overall mortality after TIPS insertion. Higher pre-TIPS RAP increased the odds of early complications and overall portal hypertensive complications as potential mechanisms for the mortality impact.

To evaluate the effect of general anesthesia on right atrial (RA) pressure measurements during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement using propensity score match analysis.

A single-institution database was used to identify 664 patients who underwent TIPS creation under either conscious sedation (CS) or general anesthesia (GA) between 2009 and 2018. A propensity-matched cohort was created using logistic regression of sedation method on demographics, liver disease status, and indications. Paired analyses were performed using mixed models for RA pressure and Cox proportional hazards model with robust standard errors for mortality.

Of the 664 patients, 270 patients were matched based on similar characteristics (135 for GA and 135 for CS). Indications for TIPS creation included intractable ascites (n = 170, 63%), hepatic hydrothorax (n = 30, 11%), variceal bleeding (n = 43, 16%), and other (n = 27, 10%). Pre-TIPS RA pressure was greater in the matched GA group as compared to CS group by a mean of 4.2 mmHg (p < 0.0001). Similarly, post-TIPS RA pressure was greater in the matched GA group as compared to CS group by a mean of 3.3 mmHg (p < 0.0001). Pre- and post-procedure RA pressure was found to have no association with post-procedure mortality (0.8891, HR 1.077; p 0.917, HR 0.997; respectively).

Utilization of GA during TIPS creation raises the intra-procedural RA pressure compared to CS. However, this elevated intra-procedural RA pressure does not appear to be predictive of mortality post-TIPS creation.

Sarcopenia is a common finding in patients with decompensated cirrhosis without effective therapy. We aimed to examine whether a transjugular portosystemic shunt (TIPS) could improve the abdominal muscle mass assessed by cross-sectional images in patients with decompensated cirrhosis and to investigate the association of imaging-defined sarcopenia with the prognosis of such patients.

In this retrospective observational study, we enrolled 25 Decompensated cirrhosis patients aged >20 who received TIPS for the control of variceal bleeding or refractory ascites between April 2008 and April 2021. All of them underwent preoperative computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, which was used to determine psoas muscle (PM) and paraspinal muscle (PS) indices at the third lumbar vertebra. First, we compared baseline muscle mass with muscle mass at 6 and 12 months after TIPS placement and analyzed PM- and PS-defined sarcopenia to predict mortality.

Among 25 patients, 20 (80.0%) and 12 (48.0%) had PM- and PS-defined sarcopenia, respectively, at baseline. In total, 16 and 8 patients were followed up for 6 and 12 months, respectively. All imaging-based muscle measurements performed 12 months after TIPS placement were significantly greater than the baseline measurements (all p < 0.05). Unlike patients with PS-defined sarcopenia (p = 0.529), patients with PM-defined sarcopenia had poorer survival than did patients without (p = 0.036).

PM mass in patients with decompensated cirrhosis may increase by 6 or 12 months after TIPS placement and imply a better prognosis. Patients with preoperative PM-defined sarcopenia may suggest poorer survival.

The hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is currently considered the gold standard to assess portal hypertension (PH) in patients with cirrhosis. A meticulous technique is important to achieve accurate and reproducible results, and values obtained during measurement are applied in risk stratification of patients with PH, allocating treatment options, monitoring follow-up, and deciding management options in surgical patients. The use of portosystemic pressure gradients in patients undergoing placement of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts has been studied extensively and has great influence on decisions on shunt diameter. The purpose of this study was to describe the recommended technique to measure HVPG and portosystemic pressure gradient and to review the existing literature describing the importance of these hemodynamic measurements in clinical practice.

Introduction: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an effective way to improve portal hypertension, however, the role of anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy following TIPS remains controversial. We conducted this study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy following TIPS. Methods: A literature search was conducted on anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy after TIPS using Pubmed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane. The retrieval period was from the earliest accessible date in the database to 31 October 2022. We collected information on the incidence of stent dysfunction, bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy, the new occurrence of portal vein thrombosis, and the survival rate. Stata was analyzed in RevMan. Results: 1. Four studies received anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy after TIPS without control groups. According to the single-group rate meta-analysis, stent dysfunction occurred at 27% [95% CI (0.19, 0.38)], bleeding occurred at 21% [95% CI (0.14, 0.29)], new portal vein thrombosis occurred at 17% [(95%CI(0.04.0.71)], hepatic encephalopathy occurred at 47% [95%CI (0.34, 0.63)], and death occurred at 31% [95% CI (0.22, 0.42)]. 2. Eight studies, including 1025 patients, compared anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy after TIPS to TIPS alone. In terms of stent dysfunction, bleeding, and hepatic encephalopathy, there were no significant differences between the two groups. The use of anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy may result in a significant decrease in the incidence of new portal vein thrombosis and mortality over 1 year. Discussion: Anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy may not improve the patency rate of TIPS, but may effectively prevent new portal vein thrombosis after TIPS. Following TIPS, the use of anticoagulants or antiplatelet drugs does not lead to an increase in bleeding or death.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation is effective in treating the sequelae of decompensated liver cirrhosis-including medically refractory ascites and variceal bleeding-by decompressing the portal venous system through a manmade portosystemic conduit within the liver. However, the altered physiology in which splenomesenteric blood bypasses intrahepatic portal venous perfusion can precipitate varying degrees of hepatic encephalopathy (HE). While the majority of post-TIPS HE cases can be treated medically, some require escalated management strategies, including endovascular interventions to modify the indwelling TIPS and/or occlude competitive physiologic spontaneous portosystemic shunts. This review article details the epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, classification, and treatment of post-TIPS HE.

In selected patients with cirrhosis and ascites, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement improves control of ascites and may reduce mortality. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge concerning the use of TIPS for the treatment of ascites in patients with cirrhosis, from pathophysiology of ascites formation to hemodynamic consequences, patient selection, and technical issues of TIPS insertion. The combination of these factors is important to guide clinical decision-making and identify the best strategy for each individual patient. There is still a need to identify the best timing for TIPS placement in the natural history of ascites (recurrent vs. refractory) as well as which type and level of renal dysfunction is acceptable when TIPS is proposed for the treatment of ascites in cirrhosis. Future studies are needed to define the optimal stent diameter according to patient characteristics and individual risk of shunt-related side effects, particularly hepatic encephalopathy and insufficient cardiac response to hemodynamic consequences of TIPS insertion.

Portal vein puncture (PVP) is a critical step during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and correlates to several complications. Techniques guiding PVP are needed.

To evaluate the safety, feasibility, and efficiency of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) overlay reference during TIPS creation and compare it with transhepatic portal vein (THPV) guiding.

The clinical records of 185 patients at three medical centers who underwent TIPS placement were reviewed. Portal vein access was guided by THPV guiding in 120 cases and DSA overlay reference in 60 cases. The number of punctures, portal vein entry time, procedural adverse events, technical and hemodynamic success rate were analyzed to compare the safety, feasibility, and efficiency of the two methods.

The median numbers of punctures in group 1 and group 2 were 2 (1-4) and 2 (1-5), respectively (P = 0.094). There was no statistical difference between two groups in needle passes. The median portal vein entry time of group 1 was 12 min (8-16 min) and 13 min (8-16 min) in group 2. No significant difference was found in the PVP time (P = 0.802). Arterioportal fistula formation occurred in 15 patients in group 1; two patients in group 2 had hepatic artery injury. The patients in group 2 had lower rates of procedural adverse events (P = 0.047). Median dose area product of G1 was lower than G2 statistically (P<0.001). There was no significant difference in total fluoroscopy time (P = 0.856).

DSA overlay reference has lower procedural adverse events rates compared with THPV guiding TIPS. It seems to be a safe and effective method for guiding PVP.

The relationship between the improvement of sarcopenia and post-TIPS prognosis has not been fully investigated.

To assess what level of sarcopenia improvement is required for potential benefits to post-TIPS prognosis.

In this retrospective study, 109 cirrhotic patients with sarcopenia who underwent TIPS between February 2016 and January 2021 were included. The change in skeletal muscle index (SMI) at 6 months post-TIPS was assessed and the correlations of SMI improvement with clinical outcomes were analyzed.

During follow up, 59 (65.6%) patients reversed from sarcopenic to non-sarcopenic, and the cumulative mortality (8.5 % vs. 26.0%, log rank P = 0.013) and incidence of overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) (18.6% vs. 44.0%, log rank P = 0.004) in patients who reversed were significantly lower than who did not. SMI improvement rate was identified as an independent risk factor for mortality and OHE. In addition, the cumulative survival rate of patients with sarcopenia reversal or SMI improvement rate > 10.4% was significantly higher than that of patients with an SMI improvement rate ≤ 10.4% (92.5% vs. 58.6%, log rank P < 0.001).

Reversal of sarcopenia or significant SMI improvement by TIPS could reduce the risk of death and OHE.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a procedure typically utilized to treat refractory ascites and variceal bleeding. However, TIPS can lead to significant complications, most commonly hepatic encephalopathy (HE). Advanced age has been described as a risk factor for HE, as the elderly population tends to have decreased cognitive reserve and increased sarcopenia. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available literature to summarize the association between advanced age and risk of adverse events after undergoing TIPS.

A comprehensive search strategy to identify reports of specific outcomes (HE, 30-day and 90-day mortality, and 30-day readmission due to HE) in elderly patients after undergoing TIPS was developed in Embase (Embase.com, Elsevier). We compared outcomes and performed separate data analyses for patients aged < 70 vs. > 70 years and patients aged < 65 vs. > 65 years.

Six studies with a total of 1,591 patients met our inclusion criteria and were included in the final meta-analysis. Three studies divided patients by age < 65 vs. > 65 years, with a total of 816 patients who were 54% male. The remaining three studies divided patients by age < 70 vs. > 70 years, with a total of 775 patients who were 63% male. Results demonstrated a significantly lower risk of post-TIPS HE (risk ratio (RR): 0.42, confidence interval (CI): 0.185 - 0.953, P = 0.03, I2 = 49%), 30-day mortality (RR: 0.37, CI: 0.188 - 0.74, P = 0.005, I2 = 0%), and 90-day mortality (RR: 0.35, CI: 0.24 - 0.49, P = 0.001, I2 = 0%) in patients aged > 70 vs. < 70 years, as well as a trend towards lower risk of 30-day readmission due to HE. There was no significant difference in post-TIPS HE, 30-day or 90-day mortality, or 30-day readmission due to HE between patients aged < 65 vs. > 65 years.

Age > 70 years is associated with significantly higher rates of HE and 30-day and 90-day mortality rates in patients after undergoing TIPS, as well as a trend towards higher 30-day readmission due to HE.

Racial, ethnic, and sex-based healthcare disparities have been documented for the past several decades. Nonetheless, disparities remain firmly entrenched in our care delivery systems, with multiple contributing factors, including patient interactions with care providers, systemic barriers to access, and socioeconomic determinants of health. Interventional radiology is also subject to these drivers of health inequity. In this review, documented disparities for the most common conditions being addressed by interventional radiologists are summarized; their magnitude is quantified where relevant, and underlying drivers are identified. Specific examples are provided to illustrate how medical, cultural, and socioeconomic factors interact to produce unequal outcomes. By outlining known disparities and common contributors, this review aims to motivate future efforts to mitigate them.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an effective therapy for portal hypertension complications and can successfully treat variceal bleeding and refractory ascites. Although TIPS is relatively safe, procedural- or shunt-related morbidity can reach 20%, and procedural complications have a fatality rate of 2%. Delayed recognition and treatment of TIPS complications can lead to life-threatening clinical scenarios. Complications can vary from stent migration or malpositioning to nontarget organ injury, TIPS dysfunction, encephalopathy, or liver failure. This review aims to outline the role of diagnostic radiology in assessing post-TIPS complications.